Reconstruction Section Reviews

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconstruction Section Reviews Name: Class: Date: RECONSTRUCTION SECTION REVIEWS Indicate the answer choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. The period of rebuilding the South after the Civil War was called a. amnesty. b. Civil Rebuilding. c. Reconstruction. d. war spoils. 2. What was the name of the decree that required a majority of the white males in a state to swear loyalty to the Union? a. Freedman’s Bureau b. Reconstruction Bill c. Ten Percent Plan d. Wade -Davis Bill 3. Which of these helped African Americans make the transition from slavery to freedom? a. Freedmen’s Bureau b. Reconstruction Act c. Ten Percent Plan d. Wade -Davis Plan 4. President Abraham Lincoln was shot at a. Ford’s Theater. b. Samuel Mudd’s house. c. the White House. d. William Peterson’s house. 5. Who was the only Southern senator to support the Union during the Civil War? a. Andrew Jackson b. Andrew Johnson c. Daniel Webster d. John C. Calhoun Match each item with its related word or phrase. a. John Wilkes Booth b. the Thirteenth Amendment c. extreme d. a group pardon e. Thaddeus Stevens 6. amnesty 7. radical 8. assassinated President Lincoln Powered by Cognero Page 1 Name: Class: Date: RECONSTRUCTION SECTION REVIEWS 9. leading Radical Republican 10. outlawed slavery Indicate the answer choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 11. Anyone born in the United States is automatically a citizen, according to the a. black codes. b. Civil Rights Act of 1866. c. Fourteenth Amendment. d. Thirteenth Amendment. 12. In 1867 states that had not ratified the Fourteenth Amendment were required to a. elect African American leaders. b. form new governments. c. leave the United States. d. lose their civil rights. 13. Which Southern state immediately ratified the Fourteenth Amendment? a. Kentucky b. Maryland c. North Carolina d. Tennessee 14. When President Andrew Johnson violated the Tenure of Office Act, the House of Representatives voted to a. execute him. b. impeach him. c. reelect him. d. suspend him. 15. Which amendment gave African American men the right to vote? a. Thirteenth Amendment b. Fourteenth Amendment c. Fifteenth Amendment d. Sixteenth Amendment Enter the appropriate word(s) to complete the statement. 16. __________________________ were intended to control freed African American men and women. 17. In 1866 President Johnson vetoed both the Freedmen's Bureau bill and the ________________________________. 18. Congress was able to ____________________ Johnson’s vetoes of civil rights legislation. Powered by Cognero Page 2 Name: Class: Date: RECONSTRUCTION SECTION REVIEWS 19. The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments were intended to guarantee newly established rights for ____________________________________. 20. The ______________________________ Act prohibited the President from removing government officials without the Senate’s approval. Indicate the answer choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 21. Southern whites who supported Republican policy throughout Reconstruction were sometimes called a. carpetbaggers. b. freedmen. c. Republican hostages. d. scalawags. 22. Northerners who moved to the South and supported the Republicans were called a. carpetbaggers. b. freedmen. c. Republican scalawags. d. sharecroppers. 23. For a brief time during Reconstruction, African Americans had a majority of seats in the lower house of which state’s legislature? a. Alabama b. Ohio c. South Carolina d. Tennessee 24. Which method did some white Southerners use to try to overcome Republican rule? a. civil rights legislation b. cooperation c. violence d. voting reform 25. Which of the following did many African Americans workers find to be little better than slavery? a. integration b. land ownership c. moving north d. sharecropping Indicate whether the statement is true or false. 26. Most newly freed African American voters supported the Republican Party. a. True b. False Powered by Cognero Page 3 Name: Class: Date: RECONSTRUCTION SECTION REVIEWS 27. Hiram Revels was the first African American to serve as a presidential adviser. a. True b. False 28. A scalawag who moved to the North was considered a carpetbagger. a. True b. False 29. Many Reconstruction-era Democrats supported the Ku Klux Klan. a. True b. False 30. Some freed African Americans borrowed money from the Freedmen’s Bank to buy land. a. True b. False Indicate the answer choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 31. Reconstruction effectively ended after a. the 1875 Civil Rights Act. b. the election of Hayes as president. c. the Republican Party dissolved. d. the Southern Democrats disbanded. 32. To keep poor people and African Americans from voting, many Southern states enforced a. crop taxes. b. Jim Crow laws. c. poll taxes. d. Reconstruction taxes. 33. Which type of society did Jim Crow laws enforce? a. affluent b. integrated c. poor d. segregated 34. The Ku Klux Klan set out to terrorize a. Democrats. b. Republicans. c. the “New South.” d. white voters. Powered by Cognero Page 4 Name: Class: Date: RECONSTRUCTION SECTION REVIEWS 35. Which of these was used to prevent African Americans from voting? a. commissions b. integration c. literacy tests d. Reconstruction Match each term with its correct description. a. Ulysses S. Grant b. lynching c. W.E.B. Du Bois d. segregation e. grandfather clause 36. rule used to prevent newly freed African Americans from voting 37. African American civil rights leader 38. war hero and two-term president 39. murder by a mob 40. legally enforced separation of races Powered by Cognero Page 5 .
Recommended publications
  • USCA Case #01-5103 Document #712838 Filed: 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 9
    <<The pagination in this PDF may not match the actual pagination in the printed slip opinion>> USCA Case #01-5103 Document #712838 Filed: 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 9 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 3, 2002 Decided November 8, 2002 No. 01-5103 Thomas B. Mudd, Son of Richard D. Mudd and great-grandson of Samuel A. Mudd, as heir and successor to Samuel A. Mudd, deceased, Appellant v. Thomas A. White, Secretary of the Army, et al., Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 97cv02946) Philip A. Gagner argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. <<The pagination in this PDF may not match the actual pagination in the printed slip opinion>> USCA Case #01-5103 Document #712838 Filed: 11/08/2002 Page 2 of 9 R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorney, ar- gued the cause for appellees. With him on the briefs were Roscoe C. Howard Jr., United States Attorney, Wyneva Johnson, Assistant United States Attorney, and James R. Agar II, Attorney, Office of the Judge Advocate General. Before: Edwards and Rogers, Circuit Judges, and Williams, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge Edwards. Edwards, Circuit Judge: The appellant, Thomas B. Mudd,* whose great-grandfather, Dr. Samuel Mudd, was convicted by a military tribunal for his alleged role in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, seeks judicial review of the Army's refusal to reverse that conviction more than a century later. Appellant bases his claim on 10 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 23 League in New York Before They Were Purchased by Granville
    is identical to a photograph taken in 1866 (fig. 12), which includes sev- eral men and a rowboat in the fore- ground. From this we might assume that Eastman, and perhaps Chapman, may have consulted a wartime pho- tograph. His antebellum Sumter is highly idealized, drawn perhaps from an as-yet unidentified print, or extrapolated from maps and plans of the fort—child’s play for a master topographer like Eastman. Coastal Defenses The forts painted by Eastman had once been the state of the art, before rifled artillery rendered masonry Fig. 11. Seth Eastman, Fort Sumter, South Carolina, After the War, 1870–1875. obsolete, as in the bombardment of Fort Sumter in 1861 and the capture of Fort Pulaski one year later. By 1867, when the construction of new Third System fortifications ceased, more than 40 citadels defended Amer- ican coastal waters.12 Most of East- man’s forts were constructed under the Third System, but few of them saw action during the Civil War. A number served as military prisons. As commandant of Fort Mifflin on the Delaware River from November 1864 to August 1865, Col. Eastman would have visited Fort Delaware on Pea Patch Island, located in the river channel between Wilmington and New Castle, Delaware. Channel-dredging had dumped tons of spoil at the northern end of the island, land upon which a miserable prison-pen housed enlisted Confederate pris- oners of war. Their officers were Fig. 12. It appears that Eastman used this George N. Barnard photograph, Fort quartered within the fort in relative Sumter in April, 1865, as the source for his painting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Conscience and the Defense of Dr. Mudd by Lorle Porter (Concluded, from Vol
    Vol. XXXVI, No. 12 December, 2011 The Catholic Conscience and the Defense of Dr. Mudd By Lorle Porter (Concluded, from Vol. XXXVI, No. 11) And his adopted brother William T. Sherman was being puffed as a presidential candidate–the last thing either man needed was association with the political “hot potato” of the day. Prosecutors such as the posturing and violent Ohioan John Bingham, were prepared to use their roles in the trial as political launching pads. Defense attorneys could look forward to nothing but vilification. Attempting to explain Ewing’s decision to join the defense, a 1980 television docudrama The Ordeal of Dr. Mudd, would depict a sequence in which General Ewing, walking down a Georgetown street, overheard a frantic Frances Mudd pleading with an attorney to defend her husband. The following scene showed Mrs. Mudd praying in a non- denominational church, only to be approached by General Ewing with an offer to help. Queried as to why a Union officer would undertake the case, Ewing Dr. Samuel Mudd merely quoted his grandfather’s admonition to follow (Libraryof Congress) an honorable path in life. The scene is fictional, if not In what would become the final month of totally implausible, given Ewing’s “lofty ideals.” the war, March, 1865, Tom Ewing went to However, if placed in a Catholic church, the scene Washington to submit his military resignation to would have been credible, especially in a symbolic Abraham Lincoln, a personal friend. His brother sense. At heart, Ewing undertook the case to defend Bub (Hugh Boyle) was back at Geisborough helping a man of his community.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford's Theatre, Lincoln's Assassination and Its Aftermath
    Narrative Section of a Successful Proposal The attached document contains the narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful proposal may be crafted. Every successful proposal is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the program guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/education/landmarks-american-history- and-culture-workshops-school-teachers for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Education Programs staff well before a grant deadline. The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Seat of War and Peace: The Lincoln Assassination and Its Legacy in the Nation’s Capital Institution: Ford’s Theatre Project Directors: Sarah Jencks and David McKenzie Grant Program: Landmarks of American History and Culture Workshops 400 7th Street, S.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8500 F 202.606.8394 E [email protected] www.neh.gov 2. Narrative Description 2015 will mark the 150th anniversary of the first assassination of a president—that of President Abraham Lincoln as he watched the play Our American Cousin at Ford’s Theatre, six blocks from the White House in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Jefferson Self-Guided Tour
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Dry Tortugas National Park Florida Fort Jefferson Self-Guided Tour Seth Eastman, 1875 Chart of the Dry Tortugas Background The story of Fort Jefferson lies with the maritime history of the Florida Straits and the excellent harborage afforded by the Dry Tortugas. These two geo- graphic features stand at a nexus of currents, winds, and shipping routes. The Dry Tortugas rest at the western extremity of the massive Florida Reef system, the third largest coral barrier reef in the world. To the south lies the island nation of Cuba. Between the two lies the 106-mile bottleneck of the Florida Straits, through which flows the Florida Current. The shallow waters of the Dry Tortugas represent a strategic refuge for ships transiting these sea- lanes between the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic. It was in 1513 that Don Juan Ponce de Leon discovered the islands of the Dry Tortugas and the Florida Current. The Florida Current is known as the Gulf Current after it merges with the Antilles Current near Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. For mariners in the Gulf of Mexico and the Florida Straights, this 2-to -4 knot current was highly prized for the added speed it provided their vessels. This was especially true for Spanish vessels carrying riches from the New World back to Spain. As maritime traffic increased along this current, the anchorage of the Dry Tortugas became vital as a haven for ships in times of inclement weather and war. After the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, American merchants from the Missis- sippi River began frequenting the Dry Tortugas harbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatching Execution: Andrew Johnson and the Hanging of Mary Surratt
    Hatching Execution: Andrew Johnson and the Hanging of Mary Surratt Sarah Westad History 489: Research Seminar December 2015 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire with the consent of the author. Contents Abstract iii Figures iv Introduction 1 Historiography 10 Primary Source Analysis 22 Conclusion 33 Works Cited 35 ii Abstract In 1865, the American Civil War and the assassination of US President Abraham Lincoln plunged the country into a state of panic. Federal officials quickly took to the ranks, imprisoning hundreds of suspected rebels believed to be involved in the assassination. Ultimately, only eight individuals, dubbed conspirators, were prosecuted and charged with murdering the Commander- in-Chief. During their trials, new president Andrew Johnson voiced grave concern over one particular conspirator, middle-aged Catholic widow Mary Surratt. As the mother of escaped conspirator, John Surratt, Johnson viewed Mrs. Surratt as an individual that needed to be treated with a particular urgency, resulting in a series of events that led to Mrs. Surratt’s execution, less than three months after the assassination, on July 7, 1865. This paper analyzes the actions of Johnson and considers the American public’s responses to Mary Surratt’s hanging. Additionally, this paper looks at the later writings of Andrew Johnson in order to gain an understanding of his feelings on Mrs. Surratt in the weeks, months, and years after her execution, as well as
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Tortugas National Park Is Deep in History, Natural Beauty
    18 July 2012 | MP3 at voaspecialenglish.com Dry Tortugas National Park Is Deep In History, Natural Beauty FAITH LAPIDUS: I’m Faith Lapidus. CHRISTOPHER CRUISE: And I’m Christopher Cruise with the VOA Special English program EXPLORATIONS. Today we visit one of the most unusual national parks in the United States. It is called the Dry Tortugas National Park. It includes seven very small islands about two-hundred kilometers southwest of the southern state of Florida. One of them was once a prison. Let us begin our visit by imagining that we are traveling back in time almost one hundred fifty years. FAITH LAPIDUS: It is the last few days of July in eighteen sixty five. The United States Navy steamship “Florida” moves slowly toward a small island. Members of the crew tie the ship to the dock. Passengers begin to leave the ship. They move slowly in the extreme heat of the summer day. In front of them is a huge red brick building. The passengers walk over a small wooden bridge. It crosses an area of water that circles the huge building. They move slowly to the only door. They pass through the door and stop in front of a group of soldiers. CHRISTOPHER CRUISE: An officer among the soldiers comes forward and tells the ship’s passengers to stop. He looks at the passengers and says, “You are now within the walls of the Fort Jefferson Military Prison in the Dry Tortugas. You have been tried, convicted and sentenced to serve your punishment here. “No prisoner has ever successfully escaped from Fort Jefferson.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay
    Review Essay PHILLIP C. STONE Alan Axelrod. Lincoln’s Last Night: Abraham Lincoln, John Wilkes Booth, and the Last 36 Hours Before the Assassination. New York: Chamberlain Bros., 2005. 133 pp. Michael W. Kauffman. American Brutus: John Wilkes Booth and the Lincoln Conspiracies. New York: Random House, 2004. xvi, 400 pp. Edward Steers Jr. Blood on the Moon: The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2001. xv, 293 pp. The story of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and its aftermath has been seriously muddled by some perverse and even fraudulent claims made about the events. The common result of American Brutus and Blood on the Moon is the restoration of “orthodoxy” in the inter- pretation of the Lincoln assassination. “Orthodoxy” here means the conclusions established in 1865 by competent evidence in the trial of the conspirators: John Wilkes Booth and the defendants conspired to kidnap Abraham Lincoln to effect an exchange of military prisoners; the abduction scheme was eventually abandoned in favor of assassination; Mary Surratt’s boardinghouse in Washington was the forum for much of the conspiracy and she directly participated in the plan; John Wilkes Booth assassinated Abraham Lin- coln April 14, 1865, in Ford’s Theatre; Lewis Powell (Payne) wounded and almost killed Secretary of State William Seward and members of his household; George Atzerodt was assigned the responsibility of assassinating Vice President Andrew Johnson but aborted the mission and ran; Booth, after fleeing Ford’s Theatre, his leg broken in flight, was joined by David Herold and made his way to southern Maryland where his broken leg was treated by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Mudd and the Lincoln Assassination: the Ac Se Reopened John Paul Jones University of Richmond, [email protected]
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 1995 Dr. Mudd and the Lincoln Assassination: The aC se Reopened John Paul Jones University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Dr. Mudd and the Lincoln Assassination: The Case Reopened (John Paul Jones ed., 1995) This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dr. udd and the Lincoln Assassination 'rH 14: CASE REOPENED The proceedings of a Moot Court of Military Appeal to hear the case of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd with contributions by F. LEE BAILEY, JOHN JAY DOUGLASS, CANDIDA EWING STEEL, JOHN S. JENKINS and others Edited by JOHN PAUL JONES $24.95 Dr. Mudd and the Lincoln Assassination THE CASE REOPENED Edited by JOHN PAUL JONES On June 30, 1865, Samuel A. Mudd was convicted of conspiring with John Wilkes Booth and others ro assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. He was sentenced ro life imprisonment on an island off the coast of Florida. Dr. Mudd was pardoned in 1869 by President Andrew Johnson, based on his assistance in a yellow fever epidemic rather than on the merits. of his case, leaving unre­ solved until the present day the question of his ultimate guilt or innocence. On February 12, 1993, the University of Richmond School of Law convened a distin­ guished group of jurists and Civil War histori­ ans to thoroughly present both sides of the case of Samuel Mudd and the broader Lincoln Conspiracy before a panel of judges in an actual courtroom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dahlgren Affair and the Lincoln Assassination
    THE DAHLGREN AFFAIR AND THE LINCOLN ASSASSINATION William Bryant Monday, October 23, 2017 Christopher Wren Association 1 BACKGROUND Thanks for intro & coming, scheduled last fall, etc. Glad for the opportunity to present a chapter of US history virtually unknown. Debated doing 1-day, 2 hrs vs 3-days, 6 hrs: Not all can attend 6 hrs and conspriracy story so complex with people and events, thread of story might be lost in details. 2 hrs should be enough time to connect the dots →→Presentation on website, books on table 2 www.wm.edu/cwa “course information” “class notes & presentations” [email protected] 3 THREE REFERENCES ON TABLE William Tidwell, Come Retribution: The Confederate Secret Service and the Assassination of Lincoln, 1988. Edward Steers, Jr., Blood on the Moon: The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, 2001. Edward Steers, Jr. (ed.), The Trial: The Assassination of President Lincoln and the Trial of the Conspirators, 2003. 4 BACKGROUND More written about AL than any other American, always ends with assassination by crazed actor. Recent research by several serious scholars has determined is not accurate—true story once known been lost to history by design. Problem: historical accurate works not widely read, serious historians just writing to each other. 5 BACKGROUND Good scholarship depends on primary sources, sources of the period. But as you will hear, majority of relevant primary sources, but the scholars’ conclusions are indisputable. Objective today: For you to leave believing what I say is historically accurate and wet your appetite to learn more of a topic still relevant today. 6 →HOUR 1 →BACKGROUND 7 HOUR 1 THE DAHLGREN AFFAIR 8 BACKGROUND 9 STONEMAN’S RAID Story begins May 1-3, 1863, with Chancellorsville, Lee’s greatest victory, thanks to Jackson who was mortally wounded by own troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Briarcliff Middle School 444 Pleasantville Road Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
    Briarcliff Middle School 444 Pleasantville Road Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510 June, 2018 Dear Students, Attached to this letter is the summer reading list for the 8th grade. You will have to read two books over the summer to be ready for school in September. One of those books will be Chasing Lincoln’s Killer by James L. Swanson. Please choose you second book from the attached list. As you read Chasing Lincoln’s Killer you should take notes on the key characters and events and how each contributed to what happened. The following pages have a note- taking guide to help you stay organized. If your notes do not fit in this chart – feel free to use extra paper. When we get back to school in September, we will be working with these notes so make sure they are legible and thorough. Look through the list of suggested reading books with a parent, teacher, librarian or friend to find books that seem appealing and appropriate for you. Plan a reading schedule for the summer so you can be sure to finish both books before school begins in September. Do not throw away this list, throughout the year you may use it to find books for outside reading. Have a wonderful summer, and happy reading! The 8th Grade English Language Arts Department Ms. Teka McCabe, Library Media Specialist Name: ____________________________________ Summer Reading Chart Chasing Lincoln’s Killer Overview: As you read Chasing Lincoln’s Killer, you will discover the key players who took part in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the attempted assassination of the Secretary of State, William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Surratt Fed Both Union Military and Southern Sympathizers Alike
    CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM By Elizabeth Steger Trindal ary Elizabeth Surratt was the first woman M to be hanged by the United States Government. She was a widow and a mother of three. She was hanged in Washington, D.C. on July 7, 1865. Those who knew her, knew that she was innocent. Most of those who didn’t know her, felt that she was one of the conspirators in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. After all, wasn’t John LibraryofCongress Wilkes Booth a friend of her son and a frequent caller at Mrs. Surratt’s Washington, D.C. boardinghouse ? The government had pronounced the woman guilty after a sixteen-week-long military trial. Neither she nor the other alleged conspirators were allowed to testify in their own defense. Nor had the charges of their crimes been read to them until the day before the trial started on May 11. The defense had no time to prepare for the hearing. In Mrs. Surratt’s case, she was arrested and taken to prison on April 17 without being told why. The writ of Habeas Corpus had long since been suspended in the United States. As Secretary of State William H. Seward once boasted to Lord Lyons, “My Lord, I can touch a bell on my right hand, order the arrest of a citizen of Ohio ; I can touch a bell again, and order the imprisonment of a citizen of New York ; and no power on earth, except that of the President, can release them. Can the Queen of England do as much ?”.
    [Show full text]