DOCSLIB.ORG

Mainedot 2018-2019-2020 Work Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mainedot 2018-2019-2020 Work Plan MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2018-2019-2020 January 2018 January 2, 2018 MaineDOT Customers and Partners: At the beginning of each year, we at the Maine Department of Transportation publish our annual Work Plan, which spells out all of the projects and activities that we plan to construct or undertake over the next three years. In the months before we publish the Work Plan, we adjust the listings for the second and third years of the previous Work Plan to reflect changing conditions—revised project cost estimates, schedule updates, changes in the scope of work, or changes in available funding. We also add new work items for the new third year—in this case, for Calendar Year 2020. As you, our customers and transportation partners, go through this Work Plan for Calendar Years 2018-2019-2020, you may see that the work items listed suggest fresh areas of emphasis, which are driven by the performance of the transportation system. This year, safety is an emphasis area that merits special attention, as shown by the work-item listings that indicate where we will use the resources entrusted to the Department. Safety is deeply embedded in the Department’s mission and the culture, and has always been at the center of our work. Every project we build and every activity we conduct has safety aspects, and we can confidently say that safety is the #1 priority in every piece of our work. But after a decade of improvement, safety performance on the transportation system across America has been trending in the wrong direction, with vehicle crashes, injuries and fatalities increasing in parallel with the growth in vehicle miles traveled. In Maine, highway deaths have been inching their way back up to previous levels. And, certain segments of the traveling public are experiencing increasing incidence of crashes—for example, motorcycle fatalities have increased markedly in recent years, and the number of pedestrian fatalities per year in Maine has basically doubled in just four years. This year’s Work Plan provides us with tools to attack these trends, including: Continued addition of rumble strips to combat lane departure—still the deadliest crash type and still the highest focus of Maine’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan Sustained funding for bridge improvements and replacements, as recommended in the 2014 report, Keeping Our Bridges Safe Targeted outreach to communities that have experienced clusters of pedestrian crashes, with the goal to identify problem areas, both physical and behavioral, and develop strategies to tackle them Funding to address pedestrian infrastructure needs, as identified through that community outreach Upgrades to guardrail systems across the state to help bring our system to a higher standard Investments to improve specific intersections and other spot locations identified through collection and analysis of data Wrong-Way Initiatives: Pavement markings, signage and technological measures to reduce wrong- way driving on Interstate ramps ‘Went-off-Road’ Curve Mitigations: A package of improvements designed to reduce crashes where there is a high risk of vehicles going off the road Funding to design and construct improvements on our Interstate Highway System, with specific focus on I-295 north of Portland, where crash incidence is high Selection of targeted safety projects for the Work Plan involves MaineDOT staff from many disciplines, ensuring a broad-based prioritization that puts the most important safety issues at the top of the list. In 2017, the Department also convened a Task Force on Roadway Safety, comprised of representatives from various partner agencies and other entities. This group developed recommendations that are also incorporated in this Work Plan, such as installing additional Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) equipment, and updating the Department’s Complete Streets Policy. The Work Plan for Calendar Years 2018-2019-2020 also carries forward from previous Work Plans several other important themes underlying MaineDOT projects, programs and operations: A Transportation Asset Management approach—a framework for managing the full range of assets in our transportation system at an optimal cost over extended periods of time. Asset management is informed by both engineering and economic considerations, and is shaped by performance goals set up to meet customer expectations. The Roads Report: In line with recommendations of this 2016 report, we are shifting distribution of highway funding more toward road preservation, and less toward reconstruction or rehabilitation. The report also led to revised Highway Corridor Priority classifications, a new Cyclical Pavement Resurfacing Program, and corridor management plans for the highest-priority roadways. Keeping Our Bridges Safe: This 2014 report recommended increasing investment in our bridges, which we are continuing to do. Partnerships: The 2018-2019-2020 Work Plan continues funding for the Department’s Municipal Partnership Initiative, which provides funding to leverage local funds to make improvements on lower-priority state-jurisdiction roads; and for the Business Partnership Initiative, which provides funding to leverage public- and private-sector investment on state roadways, to support economic opportunity. Freight: MaineDOT is continuing investment on freight railroads and rail bridges, at ports and harbors, and on highway infrastructure that supports motor transport of goods in our state. Competitive Grants: MaineDOT will continue aggressively to pursue federal grants such as the TIGER or INFRA grants administered by USDOT and its administrations. Through these opportunities, we have been able to augment our financial resources in recent years, and expand our investments beyond the limitations of federal formula programs. This Work Plan lays out a $2.3 billion-plus roadmap to maintain and improve Maine’s transportation system over the next three years. During this administration, MaineDOT staff has worked methodically to make our agency more efficient and effective. I am proud of the work MaineDOT has accomplished to date, and confident that we will deliver the work for our transportation customers—on time and within our means. Please use the Work Plan to learn what MaineDOT is doing in your community and your region to enhance safety, individual mobility, economic prosperity and the quality of life for people who live, work and travel in our state. And, as always, I invite you to let me know what we can do to better serve you, our customers. Sincerely, David Bernhardt, Commissioner Maine Department of Transportation Contents Introduction The MaineDOT Work Plan - Calendar Years 2018-2019-2020 .................................................................... i Capital Projects and Programs ....................................................................................................................... i . Highway and Bridge Capital Work ................................................................................................ ii . Multimodal Capital Work ............................................................................................................... iv . Statewide Capital Programs ............................................................................................................ v Statewide Operations ....................................................................................................................................... vi . Highway and Bridge Maintenance and Operations ...................................................................... vi . Multimodal Operations .................................................................................................................... vi Resource Assumptions and Resource Allocation ........................................................................................... vii . Funding Sources ............................................................................................................................... vii . Resource Assumptions ..................................................................................................................... viii . Resource Allocation .......................................................................................................................... ix Project Prioritization and Selection ................................................................................................................ ix . Highway and Bridge Project Prioritization ................................................................................... x . Multimodal Project Prioritization .................................................................................................. xi Transportation Needs and Goals .................................................................................................................... xii Reading the Work Plan ................................................................................................................................... xiii . Work Plan Tabs ................................................................................................................................ xiii . The Work Plan Online ....................................................................................................................... xiv Counties • Androscoggin ………………………………………………………………...………………………….. 1 • Aroostook …………………………………………………………………............................................... 11 • Cumberland ………………………………………………………………..............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish River Scenic Byway
    Fish River Scenic Byway State Route 11 Aroostook County Corridor Management Plan St. John Valley Region of Northern Maine Prepared by: Prepared by: December 2006 Northern Maine Development Commission 11 West Presque Isle Road, PO Box 779 ­ Caribou, Maine 04736 Phone: (207) 498­8736 Toll Free in Maine: (800) 427­8736 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ...............................................................................................................................................................3 Why This Byway?...................................................................................................................................................5 Importance of the Byway ...................................................................................................................................5 What’s it Like?...............................................................................................................................................6 Historic and Cultural Resources .....................................................................................................................9 Recreational Resources ............................................................................................................................... 10 A Vision for the Fish River Scenic Byway Corridor................................................................................................ 15 Goals, Objectives and Strategies.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Frequency Analyses for New Brunswick Rivers Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2920
    Flood Frequency Analyses for New Brunswick Rivers Aucoin, F., D. Caissie, N. El-Jabi and N. Turkkan Department of Fisheries and Oceans Gulf Region Oceans and Science Branch Diadromous Fish Section P.O. Box 5030, Moncton, NB, E1C 9B6 2011 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2920 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925. Rapport technique canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques Les rapports techniques contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui ne sont pas normalement appropriés pour la publication dans un journal scientifique.
    [Show full text]
  • The 147Th Annual Report of the Municipal Officers of the Town of Fort Kent, Maine for the Municipal Year Ending December 31, 2015 Fort Kent, Me
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Town Documents Maine Government Documents 2015 The 147th Annual Report of the Municipal Officers of the Town of Fort Kent, Maine For the Municipal Year Ending December 31, 2015 Fort Kent, Me. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs Repository Citation Fort Kent, Me., "The 147th Annual Report of the Municipal Officers of the Town of Fort Kent, Maine For the Municipal Year Ending December 31, 2015" (2015). Maine Town Documents. 6970. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs/6970 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Town Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TOWN OF FORT KENT ANNUAL REPORT 2015 The 147th Annual Report of the Municipal Officers of the Town of Fort Kent, Maine For the Municipal Year Ending December 31, 2015 TOWN OFFICE HOURS Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. TOWN MEETING Town Meeting Date: March 28, 2016 Time: 7:30 p.m. Place: Fort Kent Community High School Table of Contents DIRECTORY OF MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS 3 GRANT ACTIVITY 36 STAFF DIRECTORY 6 LAND USE PERMITS 39 GOVERNOR, PAUL R. LEPAGE 7 VALLEY RECYCLING FACILITY 39 US SENATOR, SUSAN M. COLLINS 8 RESERVE ACCOUNTS 40 US SENATOR, ANGUS S. KING 9 REVENUE ACCOUNTS 43 SENATOR, PETER EDGECOMB 11 MUNICIPAL DEBT SERVICE 44 HOUSE OF REP., JOHN MARTIN 12 WASTEWATER
    [Show full text]
  • Mainedot Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 2-2019 MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021" (2019). Transportation Documents. 124. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/124 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 February 2019 February 21, 2019 MaineDOT Customers and Partners: On behalf of the 2,000 valued employees of the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), I am privileged to present this 2019 Edition of our Work Plan for the three Calendar Years 2019, 2020 and 2021. Implementation of this plan allows us to achieve our mission of responsibly providing our customers with the safest and most reliable transportation system possible, given available resources. Like all recent editions, this Work Plan includes all capital projects and programs, maintenance and operations activities, planning initiatives, and administrative functions. This plan contains 2,193 individual work items with a total value of $2.44 billion, consisting principally of work to be delivered or coordinated through MaineDOT, but also including funding and work delivered by other transportation agencies that receive federal funds directly including airports and transit agencies. Although I have the pleasure of presenting this plan, it is really the product of staff efforts dating back to the summer of last year.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 CCSWCD Royal River Water Quality Management Plan
    " . ROYAL RIV£~ WATERSHED: A W1AT£R QUALITY .'l ·MANA6£M£NT PLAN 1 I I J \ ] ( J J J J j J Cumberland County SWCD Project Staff & Report Production Forrest Bell, Project Manager Alison Kisch, Conservation Technician Linda Johnson, Research Assistant ACKNOW'LED6.MENTS The Royal River Watershed Project and this report would not have been possible without the assistance of many individuals, groups and agencies. We would like to recognize and thank the following contributors: Royal River Watershed Advisory Committee Charlie Chandler, resident, New Gloucester Bill Ecyleshymer, resident, Yarmouth Judith Ecyleshymer, resident, Yarmouth Dottie Laber, public relations advisor, Orono Edwin Springer, resident, Brunswick Ted Teidemann, resident, North Yarmouth Royal River Watershed Technical Advisory Committee and Report Review Team Deb Aja, Maine DEP Susan Beede, US EPA John Boland, ME Inland Fish & Wildlife Lenny Brooks, New Gloucester David Chiapetta, USDA NRCS Ross Cudlitz, CCSWCD Chris Curtis, Yarmouth Water District Cliff Curtis, Maine DOT Lee Doggett, Maine DEP Betty Farley, CCSWCD Melissa Gormley Florence Grosvenor, Maine DEP Katherine Groves, Casco Bay Est. Project Sherry Hanson, Casco Bay Est. Proj. Phoebe Hardesty, Andy Valley SWCD Mary Holman, Friends of Royal River Bob Houston, North Yarmouth resident John Jemison, UMaine Coop. Exten. Don Kale, Maine DEP Steve Linnell, Greater Portland COG Greg & Lisa Taylor Lord, Americorps Janet Mclaughlin, Town of Yarmouth Wayne Munroe, USDA NRCS Steve Ranney, City of Auburn Diane Switzer, US EPA Leon Tsomides, Maine DEP Peter Wagner, UMaine Coop. Extension Lois Winter, US Fish & Wildlife Serv. Don Witherill, Maine DEP Diane Yorke, US Forest Service Project sponsors/partners and their roles • Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District (CCSWCD) is the main sponsor of the Royal River Watershed 104(b)(3) Planning Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy
    TOLL FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries August 2009 Publication No: FHWA-PL-09-00021 Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tollpage.htm Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land. After the American Revolution, the National Government began to realize the importance of westward expansion and trade in the development of the new Nation. As a result, an era of road building began. This period was marked by the development of turnpike companies, our earliest toll roads in the United States. In 1792, the first turnpike was chartered and became known as the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike in Pennsylvania. It was the first road in America covered with a layer of crushed stone. The boom in turnpike construction began, resulting in the incorporation of more than 50 turnpike companies in Connecticut, 67 in New York, and others in Massachusetts and around the country. A notable turnpike, the Boston-Newburyport Turnpike, was 32 miles long and cost approximately $12,500 per mile to construct. As the Nation grew, so did the need for improved roads.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD
    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Patapsco Regional Greenway the Patapsco Regional Greenway
    THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While the Patapsco Regional Greenway Concept Plan and Implementation Matrix is largely a community effort, the following individuals should be recognized for their input and contribution. Mary Catherine Cochran, Patapsco Heritage Greenway Dan Hudson, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Rob Dyke, Maryland Park Service Joe Vogelpohl, Maryland Park Service Eric Crawford, Friends of Patapsco Valley State Park and Mid-Atlantic Off-Road Enthusiasts (MORE) Ed Dixon, MORE Chris Eatough, Howard County Office of Transportation Tim Schneid, Baltimore Gas & Electric Pat McDougall, Baltimore County Recreation & Parks Molly Gallant, Baltimore City Recreation & Parks Nokomis Ford, Carroll County Department of Planning The Patapsco Regional Greenway 2 THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................4 2 BENEFITS OF WALKING AND BICYCLING ...............14 3 EXISTING PLANS ...............................................18 4 TREATMENTS TOOLKIT .......................................22 5 GREENWAY MAPS .............................................26 6 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX .................................88 7 FUNDING SOURCES ...........................................148 8 CONCLUSION ....................................................152 APPENDICES ........................................................154 Appendix A: Community Feedback .......................................155 Appendix B: Survey
    [Show full text]
  • Served Proposed Station(S)
    CURRENT PROPOSED ROUTE NAME JURISDICTION PROPOSED MODIFICATION STATION(S) STATION(S) SERVED SERVED Discontinue Service -N ew proposed Routes 21 and 99 would provide service along Jesse Hill Ave., Coca Cola Pl. and Piedmont Ave. segments. New proposed Route 99 would provide service along the Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. segment. New proposed Routes 32 and 51 would provide service on Marietta St. between Forsyth St. and Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. New proposed Route 12 would provide service on the Howell Mill Rd segment between 10th St. and Marietta Chattahoochee Ave.. New proposed Route 37 would provide service on Chattahoochee Ave. between Hills Ave. and Marietta Blvd and Marietta Blvd City of Atlanta, 1 Boulevard/Centennial between Bolton Dr. and Coronet Way. New proposed Routes 37 and 60 would provide service on Coronet Way between Marietta Blvd and Bolton Rd Georgia State Fulton County Olympic Park segments. Service will no longer be provided on Edgewood Ave. between Piedmont Ave. and Marietta St.; Marietta St. between Edgewood Ave. and Forsyth St.; Marietta St. between Ivan Allen, Jr. Blvd and Howell Mill Rd; Howell Mill Rd between Marietta St. and 10th St.; Huff Rd, Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Marietta Blvd; Chattahoochee Ave. between Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Hill Ave.; Bolton Pl., Bolton Dr.; Coronet Way between Defoors Ferry Rd and Moores Mill Rd, and Moores Mill Rd between Bolton Rd and Coronet Way. Proposed modification includes Route 2 operate from Inman Park station via Moreland Ave. (currently served by Route 6-Emory) Freedom Parkway and North Avenue, North Avenue City of Atlanta, 2 Ponce De Leon Avenue Ralph McGill Blvd (currently served by Route 16-Noble), continuing via Blvd,and North Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Aroostook County Visitor Guide © Visitaroostook.Com 1 the Trail Less Traveled
    PROUD HOST REGION OF Aroostook County Visitor Guide © visitaroostook.com 1 The Trail Less Traveled E NJOY A VISIT TO A ROOSTOOK C OUNTY , M AINE Amid a natural wonderland, visitors to the largest county east of the Mississippi River revel in a place populated by friendly folk and free roaming wildlife, in a land watered by thousands of miles of clear-running streams and hundreds of lakes. When coupled with the Great North Woods covering a vast region larger than many states, Aroostook County is your destination for uncrowded recreational pursuits, wildlife viewing, hunting and fishing – or just a solitary walk along the trail less traveled. Aroostook County’s pristine beauty and cultural heritage make VISION: it the ideal destination for an uncomplicated experience. To develop and implement a tourism MISSION: marketing program for Aroostook County. This publication produced by Aroostook County Tourism 888-216-2463 and Paid for in part by a grant from the Northern Maine Development Commission (800) 427-8736. Maine Office of Tourism. For more information, visit these websites: For additional information on Maine, visitaroostook.com & nmdc.org call 1-888-MAINE45 or go to visitmaine.com. 2 Aroostook County Visitor Guide © visitaroostook.com AROOSTOOK COUNTY NORTH MAINE WOODS AROOSTOOK STATE PARK How to use this map & guide North Maine Woods ....................Green St. John Valley ............................Yellow NORTH Central Aroostook ..........................Blue GATE TO Southern Aroostook........................Red BAXTER SHIN D ISTAN C ES POND W IT H IN A ROOSTOOK T O A ROOSTOOK Fort Kent to Caribou .......... 45 miles New York, NY ............601 miles Madawaska to Houlton ....
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Maine State Rail Plan
    Maine State Rail Plan TABLE OF CONTENTSview Chapter 1 Framework of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.1 Purpose of the State Rail Plan 1.1 1.2 Visions, Goals, Objectives of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.3 1.3 Transportation and Rail Planning in Maine 1.6 . Figure 1-1: MaineDOT Organizational Chart 1.7 . Figure 1-2: Maine’s MPO Areas 1.10 . Figure 1-3: Regional Planning and Development Councils 1.11 1.4 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 1.12 1.5 Review of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning Studies 1.17 1.6 Evaluation Criteria 1.18 Chapter 2 Freight Rail System 2.1 Overview 2.1 . Figure 2-1: North American Class I Rail Connections 2.2 . Figure 2-2: Map of MM&A Abandonment 2.6 . Figure 2-3: State of Maine Owned Rail Status 2.10 2.2 Freight Rail Industry Development 2.10 2.3 Maine’s Freight Railroad Facilities 2.12 2.4 International, National and Regional Context 2.21 . Figure 2-4: Canadian Class I Connections to Maine System 2.21 . Figure 2-5: Northeast U.S. Rail Freight System 2.22 . Figure 2-6: NS, CP, PAS and PAR Corridors 2.23 . Figure 2-7: Railroad Return on Investment and Cost of Capital 2.24 2.5 Freight Rail Issues and System Constraints 2.24 . Figure 2-8: Estimated National Highway System Peak-Period Congestion 2.25 . Figure 2-9: Estimated Rail Freight Service Levels, 2035 2.25 . Figure 2-10: Rail Clearance and Weight Constraints 2.28 .
    [Show full text]