DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim / Final Report 31/03/2019 C2C CC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interim / Final Report 31/03/2019 C2C CC (Integrated Projects funded under the LIFE 2014 Call onwards must use this format.) LIFE Project Number <LIFE15 IPC/DK/000006-C2C CC> Interim / Final Report Covering the project activities from 01/11/20161 to 31/12/2018 corresponding to Phase(s) 1 (2017-2018) Reporting Date2 31/03/2019 LIFE PROJECT NAME or Acronym C2C CC Project Data Project location: Central Denmark Region Project start date: 01/11/2016 Project end date: 31/12/2022 Extension date: <dd/mm/yyyy > Total budget: 11,690,050 € EU contribution: 7,009,893 € (%) of eligible costs: 60% Data Beneficiary Name Beneficiary: Central Denmark Region Contact person: Mrs Dorthe Selmer Postal address: Skottenborg 26, Dk 8800 Viborg Telephone: + 45 3053 9544 E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Project Website: www.c2ccc.eu 1 Project start date 2 Include the reporting date as foreseen in part C2 of Annex II of the Grant Agreement 1 Instructions: Reports must be submitted in English. The coordinating beneficiary shall report to the Contracting Authority about the technical and financial progress of the project. The project's achieved results and possible problems should be highlighted in these reports. Interim reports shall be submitted according to the reporting schedule included in form C2 of the Grant Agreement, or within 90 days following the end of the project period reported. The Final Report must be submitted to the DG ENV/EASME3 no later than 3 months after the project end date. Identical copies of the report shall be simultaneously forwarded to the DG ENV/EASME and to the external monitoring team designated by the DG ENV/EASME. The technical report shall be provided in both paper and electronic versions. The deliverables shall be provided in electronic version only; however, actual samples of publications (including brochures, posters, books, albums) and other dissemination materials / gadgets produced by the project shall be submitted. An index (in both paper and electronic form) shall be annexed to the report, listing all the deliverables provided electronically along with a short description of the content of each deliverable. Regarding the financial report printed signed originals of the payment request form, all cost statements (consolidated and individual beneficiaries’ cost statements) and the beneficiary's certificate (if applicable), are required. A pdf version of these signed forms is also required. Financial documentation requested by the EC (communication on previous pre-financing payments) must be provided with the Final report in digital format only. However, any certificates, certified statements, including the auditor’s certificate (if signed) must be provided as printed signed originals (at least in the package sent to the DG ENV/EASME) as well as in digital copy (pdf). The complete financial report shall be provided in paper form, and in electronic format as an excel file. Refer to the additional instructions concerning deliverables and the financial report, at the end of this document. Please refer to the General Conditions annexed to your Grant Agreement for the contractual requirements concerning an Interim/Final Report. The first Interim Report shall report on progress from the project start-date; the following Interim reports shall report on overall progress since the project start and detailed progress during the phase reported. Final Reports shall report on progress (or include the financial data) from the project start-date. 3 LIFE14 IPE projects should send all reports only to DG ENV and the monitoring team. 2 Table of contents 1. List of key-words and abbreviations .................................................................................. 5 2. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 7 3. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.1. Overall and specific objectives ..................................................................................... 10 3.2 Main plan targeted .......................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Main strategy for ensuring full implementation of the plan(s) ...................................... 10 3.4 Climate related issues adressed ...................................................................................... 11 3.5 Expected longer term results (anticipated at the start of the project) ............................. 12 4. Administrative part ........................................................................................................... 13 4.1 The project management process ................................................................................... 13 4.2 Stakeholder involvement ................................................................................................ 19 4.3 Communication with DG ENV/EASME and Monitoring team ..................................... 19 4.4 Changes in relation to the last interim report ................................................................. 20 6. Technical part ................................................................................................................... 21 6.1 Preparatory Actions – A Actions ................................................................................... 21 6.2 Concrete Implementation Actions – C Actions .................................................................. 31 6.3 Monitoring Actions – D Actions ........................................................................................ 97 6.4 Communication actions – E actions ................................................................................. 104 6.5 Financial actions – F action .............................................................................................. 116 6.6 Overall status of the complementary actions ................................................................... 119 6.7 Evaluation of Project Implementation .............................................................................. 129 6.8. Program for project implementation in the next phase period (only for Interim Reports) ................................................................................................................................................ 137 7. Project Specific Indicators ............................................................................................. 146 8. Comments on the financial report .................................................................................. 146 8.1 Summary of Costs Incurred .......................................................................................... 147 8.2 Accounting system ....................................................................................................... 147 8.3 Partnership arrangements ............................................................................................. 148 8.4 Certificate on the financial statement ........................................................................... 148 8.5 Summary of costs per action ........................................................................................ 149 ANNEX 1 ............................................................................................................................... 150 DELIVERABLE AND MILESTONES SCHEDULE ....................................................... 150 MAIN DELIVERABLE PRODUCTS OF THE PROJECT ............................................ 150 31/09/2018 .............................................................................................................................. 154 31/08/2019 .............................................................................................................................. 154 31/09/2020 .............................................................................................................................. 154 31/09/2022 .............................................................................................................................. 154 31/06/2023 .............................................................................................................................. 154 Report on Kick-off seminar .................................................................................................... 154 26/01/2017 .............................................................................................................................. 154 30/03/2017 .............................................................................................................................. 154 30/03/2017 .............................................................................................................................. 154 MAIN MILESTONES OF THE PROJECT ...................................................................... 154 Phase 1 progress report .......................................................................................................... 160 “Clearing House” established ................................................................................................. 160 Mid-term report ...................................................................................................................... 160 Phase 2 progress report .......................................................................................................... 160 Phase 3 progress report .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Copenhagen
    Geographical Variation in Opioid Use in Elderly Patients with Dementia A Nationwide Study Jensen-Dahm, Christina; Zakarias, Johanne Købstrup; Gasse, Christiane; Waldemar, Gunhild Published in: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease DOI: 10.3233/JAD-190413 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY-NC Citation for published version (APA): Jensen-Dahm, C., Zakarias, J. K., Gasse, C., & Waldemar, G. (2019). Geographical Variation in Opioid Use in Elderly Patients with Dementia: A Nationwide Study. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 70(4), 1209-1216. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190413 Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 70 (2019) 1209–1216 1209 DOI 10.3233/JAD-190413 IOS Press Geographical Variation in Opioid Use in Elderly Patients with Dementia: A Nationwide Study Christina Jensen-Dahma,∗, Johanne Købstrup Zakariasa, Christiane Gasseb,c and Gunhild Waldemara aDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark bDepression and Anxiety/Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark cNational Centre for Register Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Handling Associate Editor: Alba Malara Accepted 8 June 2019 Abstract. Background: We recently reported frequent use of opioids among elderly with dementia. Discrepancies in clinical practice may in part explain the higher use of opioids in elderly with dementia, which geographical variation may be able to clarify. Objective: To investigate geographical variation in opioid use in elderly with dementia compared to elderly without dementia. Methods: Register-based cross-sectional study in the entire elderly (≥65 years) population of Denmark in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Øresund Kattegat Skagerrak Cooperation Projects in Interreg IV A
    ConneCting Øresund Kattegat SkagerraK Cooperation projeCts in interreg iV a 1 CONTeNT INTRODUCTION 3 PROgRamme aRea 4 PROgRamme PRIORITIes 5 NUmbeR Of PROjeCTs aPPROveD 6 PROjeCT aReas 6 fINaNCIal OveRvIew 7 maRITIme IssUes 8 HealTH CaRe IssUes 10 INfRasTRUCTURe, TRaNsPORT aND PlaNNINg 12 bUsINess DevelOPmeNT aND eNTRePReNeURsHIP 14 TOURIsm aND bRaNDINg 16 safeTy IssUes 18 skIlls aND labOUR maRkeT 20 PROjeCT lIsT 22 CONTaCT INfORmaTION 34 2 INTRODUCTION a short story about the programme With this brochure we want to give you some highlights We have furthermore gathered a list of all our 59 approved from the Interreg IV A Oresund–Kattegat–Skagerrak pro- full-scale projects to date. From this list you can see that gramme, a programme involving Sweden, Denmark and the projects cover a variety of topics, involve many actors Norway. The aim with this programme is to encourage and and plan to develop a range of solutions and models to ben- support cross-border co-operation in the southwestern efit the Oresund–Kattegat–Skagerrak area. part of Scandinavia. The programme area shares many of The brochure is developed by the joint technical secre- the same problems and challenges. By working together tariat. The brochure covers a period from March 2008 to and exchanging knowledge and experiences a sustainable June 2010. and balanced future will be secured for the whole region. It is our hope that the brochure shows the diversity in Funding from the European Regional Development Fund the project portfolio as well as the possibilities of cross- is one of the important means to enhance this development border cooperation within the framework of an EU-pro- and to encourage partners to work across the border.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Energy Planning in Denmark at Municipal And
    STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL The Danish government’s long-term vision is that Denmark becomes independent of fossil fuels. Municipalities have the local knowledge that can ensure political anchoring and commitment from citizens and local businesses to the green transition of the energy system and the economy. In their capacity as local planning and land-use authority, as owner of supply and transport companies, and as a major consumer, the municipalities are in a unique position to facilitate change. A program with 3.3 mill. EUR was launched in 2014 to support municipal strategic energy planning, providing a 50% grant for the projects. Strengthening partnerships: Cost-effective transition to green growth: • Vertically – state, region, municipality • Mapping energy efficiency and renewable energy resources • Horizontally – across municipalities • Analysing energy futures and strategic choices • Locally – businesses, supply companies, municipality • Setting targets and action plans • Internally – municipal administrations • Demonstrating green solutions • Democratically – citizens and interest organisations In total, 14 partnership projects for strategic energy planning were initiated with each their unique partnership structure and with each their individual energy perspective. The support program aimed at demonstrating different types of partnerships and tackle different aspects of a cost-effective transition to green growth. The 14 projects include 6 regional projects (in the five Danish regions) and 8 projects involving a smaller number of municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Certification Information for Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 798/20081
    Certification information for Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 798/20081 POULTRY, HATCHING EGGS, DAY-OLD CHICKS, SPECIFIED PATHOGEN-FREE EGGS, MEAT, MINCED MEAT, MECHANICALLY SEPARATED MEAT, EGGS AND EGG PRODUCTS ISO code Code of Description of third country, territory, zone or compartment Veterinary certificate Spec Specific conditions Avian Avian Salmon and third ific influen influen ella name of country, Model(s) Addition cond Closing Opening za za control third territory, al ition date a date b surveill vaccin status country zone or guarante s ance ation or compart es status status territory ment 1 2 3 4 5 6 6A 6B 7 8 9 Whole country SPF BE-0 EP, E, N Whole country excluding BE-2 WGM POU, RAT N BE-1 BPP, BPR, DOC, N A DOR, HEP, HER, SRP, SRA, LT20 BE- BE-2 Area compromising: Belgium The municipalities Ledegem, Menen, Wervik and Wevelgem and those parts of WGM P2 26.11.2020 26.12.2020 the municipalitiy of Izegem, Zonnebeke, Komen, Kortrijk, Kuurne, Lendelede, Moeskroen, Moorslede and Roeselare contained within a circle of a radius of 10 POU, RAT N BE-2.1 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 3.126743 lat 50.820040 P2 and beyond the area described in the protection zone BPP, BPR, DOC, A DOR, HEP, HER, SRP, SRA, LT20 Those parts of the municipalitiy of Menen, Moorslede, Wervik and Wevelgem WGM P2 18.11.2020 26.12.2020 BE-2.2 contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometers, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 3.126743 – lat 50.820040 POU, RAT N 1 References to European Union legislation within this document are references to direct EU legislation which has been retained in Great Britain (retained EU law as defined in the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace for Young People in This Issue
    tidskriften datorn i utbildningen www.diu.se Workplace for young people In this issue: Scandinavia@BETT Denmark Norway Sweden 2 diu@BETT • 2013 Scandinavia@bett We present three cases. Three Scandinavian cases of schools meeting the future. Not in a full and comprehensive study, but a picture with some facets. We want to give you some of the experiences, some of the perspectives and some of the challenges schools meet. And how it’s met by three Scandinavian schools and Municipalities. Here, in this brochure we try to convey a snapshot of the change following digitalization of schools, by showing three glimpses from Scandinavia, from three schools, one each in Nor- way, Denmark and Sweden. They have been chosen from three different municipalities, not necessarily outstanding. One larger city on the Norwegian coast, old city with harbor and shipping industry. One a small town in the Jutland countryside in a rural area and an hour from second largest Da- nish city Århus, and finally a middle sized Swedish industrial town, in forest and mine region with iron as the dominating trade. They have been chosen to reflect what is happening this very now. Schools slowly – or more rapidly! – developing their curriculum, their methods and their tools. Still doing the same thing, trying to give young people a good start in their life, knowled- ge, skills and personal development. Reflecting some of the new things growing. For each a video, a written and an oral report to inspire or stimulate reflection. Three facets are completing the picture. Oystein Johannessen well known for his long period at the Knowledge Department in Oslo, Norway, with his focus on na- tional policies for developing schools with ICT.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Innovation: Storying the Renewable Energy Island Samsø
    Participatory Innovation: Storying the Renewable Energy Island Samsø Irina Papazu PhD Dissertation Department of Political Science University of Copenhagen January 2016 Table of contents Preface 4 Acknowledgements 8 1. Introduction 10 Clarifications: Theory, methods and contributions 20 Storytelling as appreciative engagement 20 Three basic stories about ANT 22 A note on knowledge formation 24 Overview of chapters and articles 26 2. Becoming Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island 32 3. The island laboratory 44 The island as test site 47 The making of a model 52 Different modes of generalization 55 4. STS as empirical philosophy 60 STS and political science 66 An empirical attitude to politics 69 Politics and democracy as collective world-making 72 Democracy as collective self-governance: Reinventing the island 73 5. Participatory methods 80 Fieldwork, or How to hold realities steady? 84 Interviews and documents, or How to account for past events? 89 Doing interviews on Samsø 90 Assembling a digital archive 94 2 Analysis/Writing, or How to choose between accounts? 99 Three Tables for overview 106 6. Bibliography 113 Paper 1 Demonstrating Doability: The Networking Practices of a Danish Renewable Energy Island 129 Paper 2 Transition Stories and Their Ethnographic Counterparts: Samsø’s Renewable Energy Transition 167 Paper 3 Management Through Hope: An ethnography of Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island 200 Paper 4 Authoring Participation 226 Paper 5 Nearshore Wind Resistance on Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island: Not Another NIMBY Story 261 Appendix 1: English summary 299 Appendix 2: Resumé (Danish summary) 301 Appendix 3: Abstract 303 3 Preface In 1997 Samsø, an island of four thousand inhabitants nestled in the Kattegat Strait between Jutland and Sealand, embarked on a ten-year-long journey toward becoming Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Everyday Meal Preparation for People with Dementia
    Indsæt nyt ikon Bring ideas to life VIA University College hvis Everyday meal preparation for Indsæt hjælpelinjer til people with dementia Højre klik udenfor slidet BENDTSEN Trine Vase, cand scient Human Nutrition IVERSEN Mette K. F., cand scient Human Nutrition NEJSUM Hanne Lindberg, Master in Humanities and Health Skriv titel på præsentation Introduction When people are diagnosed with dementia everyday activities like meal preparation will gradually become more difficult – Meal preparation to maintain identity – Weight loss and malnutrition as central nutritional issues Genoe, R., Dupuis,S. L., Keller, H. H., Martin, L. S., Cassolato, C. and Edward, H. G. (2010) J AgingStud 24: 181-193 Volkert, D., Chourdakis, M., Faxen-Irving, G., Früwald, T., Landi, F., Suominen, M.H…..Schneider, S.M. (2015) Clin Nutr, 34, 1052-1073 Aim of the project To develop a guide to increase the possibility for people with dementia to continue everyday life through participating in meal preparation Method – from Action Research to Design Based Research How can we make sure that the solution will be useful in practice? – Considerations regarding target group – Use of experience and research – Our influence as researchers – Iterations – Both methods are person-centered, application-specific and practicable Co-operation with people with dementia and their caregivers Observations Theory and workshop Development Theory and test of recipes Theory Development and test of product Final product Preliminary Results Personalization of product – Lifestory with meal preparation as center – Use of utensils e.g. scale, oven, hot plate – Activity analysis – Attention regarding nutritional needs Design of recipes Next step – Tests of guide and recipes – Compose the final product – End of project December 2017 Thank you for your attention Funded by: Thanks to collaborators from Favrskov Municipality, Viborg Municipality, Aarhus Municipality and Holstebro Municipality and people with dementia and relatives we visited in their private homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bi-Annual Progress Report IV ELENA-2012-038 June 15Th 2016 to December 15Th 2016
    Bi-annual Progress Report IV ELENA-2012-038 June 15th 2016 to December 15th 2016 Table of Contents 1 Work Progress ............................................................................................ 2 1.1 Staff and recruitment ................................................................................... 2 1.2 Progress meetings with the municipalities .................................................. 2 1.3 Progress meetings within the Project Department ...................................... 2 1.4 Conferences and courses ........................................................................... 3 1.5 Task Groups ................................................................................................ 3 1.6 Cooperation with the other Danish ELENA projects ................................... 3 1.7 Secondments .............................................................................................. 4 1.8 Steering Committee ..................................................................................... 4 1.9 Advisory Group ............................................................................................ 5 1.10 New initiatives ............................................................................................. 5 2 Current status – implementation of the investment program ............... 6 2.1 The leverage factor ..................................................................................... 6 3 Identified Problems and Risks for Implementation ................................ 8 3.1
    [Show full text]
  • ANHOLT SCHOOL Demonstration Projects According to Cradle-To-Cradle®-Principles
    ANHOLT SCHOOL Demonstration projects according to Cradle-to-Cradle®-principles Carla K. Smink and Søren Kerndrup (ed.) - 2 - Anholt School Demonstration projects according to Cradle-to-Cradle®-principles Carla K. Smink and Søren Kerndrup (Ed.), NovemBer 2012 Aalborg University Department of Development and Planning Vestre Havnepromenade 9 9000 Aalborg Denmark http://www.en.plan.aau.dk/ Printed By: SæBy Bogtryk, Tranåsvej 8A, 9300 SæBy, E-mail: [email protected], http://www.sbo.dk, CVR nr.: DK 19 49 78 79 PuBlished By: AalBorg University, Department of Development and Planning, 2012 Translated from Danish to English By: Carla K. Smink and Christina Grann Myrdal - 4 - Preface This report has Been written on the Basis of the work AalBorg University (AAU) has carried out in the Cradle-to-Cradle Islands project (C2CI-project) (www.c2cislands.org) on Anholt. The C2CI-project is an Interreg IVB North Sea Region project with 22 partners from 6 countries around the North Sea. The project ran from January 2009 to summer 2012. The leading vision of the project was to see islands as innovative centres that implement Cradle-to- Cradle® solutions. The main goal was to develop innovative solutions in the field for energy, water and materials using Cradle-to-Cradle® (C2C) principles as a guide. The focus of this report is on demonstration projects using C2C principles as a guide that can Be implemented at Anholt School. Anholt is part of Norddjurs Municipality, project partner in the C2CI-project and owner of the school. The report is aimed at people connected to the school (the school’s principal, the manager of the nursery, teachers, and the parents’ committee), Norddjurs Municipality and the other partners in C2CI-project.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome Future
    WELCOME FUTURE Date: April 2018 Publisher: Aarhus 2017 Foundation Publication Manager and Editor: Rina Valeur Simonsen Monitoring and Research team: Anne Juhl Nielsen, Nana Renee Andersen, Brian Duborg Ebbesen, Maria Hyllested Poulsen Design: Hele Vejen Print: We Produce ISBN: 978-87-999627-7-8 Welcome Future Short-term impact of European Capital of Culture Aarhus 2017 Welcome Future / Intro 2 Aarhus 2017 Contents 4 Selected outcomes 6 Forewords 6 Mette Bock, Minister for Culture 7 Tibor Navracsics, European Commissioner for Education, Culture, Youth and Sport 8 ▪Anders Kühnau, Chair of the Regional Council, Central Denmark Region 9 ▪Jacob Bundsgaard, Mayor, Aarhus and Chair, Aarhus 2017 Foundation 10 ▪Rebecca Matthews, Chief Executive Officer, Aarhus 2017 Foundation 12 Six Strategic Goals and Key Performance Indicators 18 Executive Summary 20 Aarhus in Context 22 Methodology 24 Cultural Impact A stronger and more connected cultural sector 28 ▪A year like no other 36 ▪All art forms and more 44 ▪Something for everyone 48 Selected reviews 53 Local anchoring 56 ▪Grassroots engagement 58 ▪Inviting the world 68 Scaling up the cultural sector 74 Selected awards and nominations Welcome Future / Intro 3 Aarhus 2017 76 Social Impact Active and engaged citizens 80 Engagement through volunteering 90 Cultural community engagement 96 More culture for more people: making art accessible 102 Economic Impact Growth through investment 104 Economic outcome 106 Record growth in visitors 112 Tourist influx by boat and plane 116 Travelling business 118 New
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Cases
    Table of Cases Table of Cases Table of Cases Judgments of the Danish Courts (alphabetical) Arriva Skandinavien A/S vs. Danish Transport Authority. Danish weekly law reports 2007.2106H 602 Bent Mousten Vestergaard vs. Spøttrup Boligselskab. Danish weekly law reports 2002. 1297V, 76 Bredkjær Industri A/S vs. Municipality of Hals. Judgment of the Supreme Court of 30 April 1985, 602 Brunata A/S vs. Aalborg Boligselskab anno 1956. Jugment of the Western High Court of 6 March 2007 in case B-1923/05, 602 Dan Skoubo vs. Revisionsfirmaet Teddie Thulstrup A/S. Danish weekly law reports 2000.521H Danish Ministry of Taxation vs SP Moulding A/S. Judgement of 20 May 2009 in case BS 99-1556/2007, 600 EDs Secure Networks vs. Økonomi- og It- & Telestyrelsen. Judgment of the Supreme Court of 24 February 2011 555 European Metro Group vs. Ørestadsselskabet. Judgment of the Eastern High Court of 16 September 2002 (3rd div) in Case B-104-97, 296, 357, 600, 609 European Metro Group vs. Ørestadsselskabet. Judgment of the Supreme Court of 31 March 2005 (2nd div) in Case 428. Danish weekly law reports 2005.1799H, 463, 592, 599, 600 Copenhagen Business School and Ministry of Research vs. Højgaard & Schultz A/S. Judgment of the Eastern High Court of 16 August 2000 (5th div) in Case B-1654-97 and others, 277 County of Århus vs. Judex A/S. Judgment of the Western High Court of 16 March 2004 in the Cases B-2567-01 and B-1979-02, 588, 595, 600, 605 Humus/Genplast ApS vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemisk Grundvandskortlægning
    DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 2020/11 Danish review on advances in assessing: N retention in the subsurface in relation to future targeted N-regulation of agriculture November 2019 Birgitte Hansen, Anders Vest Christiansen, Tommy Dalgaard, Flemming Jørgensen, Bo V. Iversen, Jakob Juul Larsen, Charlotte Kjærgaard, Brian H. Jacobsen, Esben Auken, Anker Lajer Højberg & Stefan Schaper Geological survey of Øster Voldgade 10 GEUS is a research and advisory Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) DK-1350 Copenhagen K institution in the Danish Ministry GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND Denmark of Climate, Energy and Utilities DANISH MINISTRY OF CLIMATE, ENERGY AND UTILITIES DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 2020/11 Danish review on advances in assessing: N retention in the subsurface in relation to future targeted N-regulation of agriculture November 2019 Birgitte Hansen, Anders Vest Christiansen, Tommy Dalgaard, Flemming Jørgensen, Bo V. Iversen, Jakob Juul Larsen, Charlotte Kjærgaard, Brian H. Jacobsen, Esben Auken, Anker Lajer Højberg & Stefan Schaper GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND DANISH MINISTRY OF CLIMATE, ENERGY AND UTILITIES 2 G E U S DE NATIONALE GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSER FOR DANMARK OG GRØNLAND KLIMA- OG ENERGIMINISTERIET 3 Affiliation of authors Birgitte Hansen: GEUS Anders Vest Christiansen: Department of Geosciences, AU Tommy Dalgaard: Department of Agroecology, AU Flemming Jørgensen: Central Denmark Region Bo V. Iversen: Department of Agroecology, AU Jakob Juul Larsen: Department of Engineering, AU Charlotte Kjærgaard: SEGES, Landbrug og Fødevare Brian H. Jacobsen: Department of Food and Resource Economics, KU Esben Auken: Department of Geosciences, AU Anker Lajer Højberg: GEUS Stefan Schaper: Department of Management, BSS, AU 4 G E U S Content 1.
    [Show full text]