DOCSLIB.ORG

WMMII-Lesson11

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Western Materia Medica Pain By Terry Willard ClH, PhD Botanicals Pain Pain is transmitted to the brain from sensory nerves. Substances that decrease pain either interfere with the ability of nerves to conduct messages, or alter the brain’s capacity to receive sensations. Pain may be a symptom of an underlying pathological condition, such as inflammation. It may also be due to other causes, such as bruising, infection, burns, headaches, or sprains and strains. Use caution when treating pain without understanding its cause—this may delay diagnosis of conditions that could continue to worsen without medical attention. Checklist for Pain D-phenylalanine (DPA), Vitamin B12, American scullcap, Arnica, Cannabis, Cayenne (capsaicin; topical use only), Corydalis, Cramp bark, Feverfew, Passion flower, Phyllanthus, Piscidia erythrina, St. John’s wort, Valerian, Willow. Symptoms of pain include discomfort that is often worsened by movement or pressure and may be associated with irritability, problems sleeping, and fatigue. People with pain may have uncomfortable sensations described as burning, sharp, stabbing, aching, throbbing, tingling, shooting, dull, heavy, and tight. Lifestyle changes that may be helpful: Body weight may be related to pain tolerance. One study indicated women who are more than 30% above the ideal weight for their age experience pain more quickly and more intensely than do women of ideal weight.1 No research has been found that investigated the effect of weight loss on pain tolerance. Exercise increases pain tolerance in some situations, in part because exercise may raise levels of naturally occurring painkillers (endorphins and enkephalins).2,3,4 Many types of chronic pain are helped by exercise, though some types of physical activity may aggravate certain painful conditions. People who want to initiate an exercise program for increasing pain tolerance should first consult a qualified health professional.5,6,7,8 ©2011 Wild Rose College of Natural Healing 1 All Rights Reserved. Western Materia Medica Pain By Terry Willard ClH, PhD Botanicals Nutritional supplements may be helpful: Certain amino acids have been found to raise pain thresholds and increase tolerance to pain. One of these, a synthetic amino acid called D-phenylalanine (DPA), decreases pain by blocking the enzymes that break down endorphins and enkephalins, the body’s natural pain-killing chemicals. DPA may also produce pain relief by other mechanisms which are not well understood.9,10,11 D-phenylalanine (DPA) Other amino acids may be beneficial in reducing pain. In the central nervous system, L-tryptophan serves as a precursor to serotonin. Serotonin participates in the regulation of mood and may alter responses to pain. In a preliminary trial, 2,750 mg per day of L-tryptophan decreased pain sensitivity. Another preliminary trial found that L-tryptophan (500 mg every four hours) taken the day before a dental procedure significantly decreased the postoperative pain experienced by patients. In another preliminary trial 3 grams of L-tryptophan taken daily for four weeks significantly decreased pain in a group of people with chronic jaw pain. No research has been published investigating the pain control potential of 5- hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), another serotonin precursor, that, unlike L-tryptophan, is currently available without a prescription.12,13 L-tryptophan Vitamin B12 has exhibited pain-killing properties in animal studies. In humans with vertebral pain syndromes, injections of massive amounts of vitamin B12 (5,000 to 10,000 mcg per day) have reportedly provided pain relief. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of this treatment.14,15 ©2011 Wild Rose College of Natural Healing 2 All Rights Reserved. Western Materia Medica Pain By Terry Willard ClH, PhD Botanicals Herbs that are helpful: Capsaicin is an extract of cayenne pepper that may ease many types of chronic pain when applied regularly to the skin. In animal studies, capsaicin was consistently effective at reducing pain when given orally, by injection, or when applied topically. 16,17 A controlled trial in humans found that application of a solution of capsaicin (0.075%) decreased skin sensitivity to all noxious stimuli.18 In several uncontrolled and at least five controlled clinical trials, capsaicin has been consistently shown to decrease the pain of many disorders, including trigeminal neuralgia, shingles, diabetic neuropathy, osteoarthritis, and cluster headaches.19,20,21,22,23 For treatment of chronic pain, capsaicin ointment or cream (standardized to 0.025 to 0.075% capsaicin) is typically applied to the painful area four times per day.24 It is common to experience stinging and burning at the site of application, especially for the first week of treatment; avoid getting it in the eyes, mouth, or open sores. Chinese researchers also note that 75 mg per day of THP (an alkaloid from the plant corydalis) was effective in reducing nerve pain in 78% of those tested.25 Relaxation exercises may decrease the perception of pain. Pain increases as anxiety increases; using methods to decrease anxiety may help reduce pain. In one controlled hospital study, people who were taught mind-body relaxation techniques reported less pain, less difficulty sleeping, and fewer symptoms of depression or anxiety than did people who were not taught the techniques.26,27 Acupuncture has been shown to decrease pain by acting on the enkephalin-based, pain-killing pathways. In 1997, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) stated that acupuncture is useful for muscular, skeletal, and generalized pain, as well as for anesthesia and post- operative pain. The NIH statement was based on a critical review of over 67 controlled trials of acupuncture for pain control.28 ©2011 Wild Rose College of Natural Healing 3 All Rights Reserved. Western Materia Medica Pain By Terry Willard ClH, PhD Botanicals Hypnosis has been shown to significantly reduce pain associated with office surgical procedures that are performed while the patient is conscious (i.e., without general anesthesia).29 In one study people, who were undergoing office surgical procedures, received standard care, structured attention or self-hypnotic relaxation. Those using self-hypnosis had no increases in pain during the procedures, compared to those in the other groups. Hypnosis also appeared to stabilize bleeding, decrease the requirement for narcotic pain drugs during the procedure, and shorten procedure time. References: 1..Pradalier A, Willer JC, Dry J. Pain sensitivity in obese individuals. Ann Med Interne (Paris) 1982;133:528–31. 2..Guieu R, Blin O, Pouget J, Serratrice G. Nociceptive threshold and physical activity. Can J Neurol Sci 1992;19:69–71. 3..Fordyce W, McMahon R, Rainwater G, et al. Pain complaint—exercise performance relationship in chronic pain. Pain 1981;10:311–21. 4..Schwarz L, Kindermann W. Changes in beta-endorphin levels in response to aerobic and anaerobic exercise. Sports Med 1992;13:25–36 [review] 5..Ferrell BA, Josephson KR, Pollan AM, et al. A randomized trial of walking versus physical methods for chronic pain management. Aging (Milano) 1997;9:99–105. 6..McCain GA. Nonmedicinal treatments in primary fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1989;15:73– 90 7..Kottke TE, Caspersen CJ, Hill CS. Exercise in the management and rehabilitation of selected chronic diseases. Prev Med 1984;13:47–65 [review] 8..Cowan P, Lovasik DA. American Chronic Pain Association: strategies for surviving chronic pain. Orthop Nurs 1990;9:47–9 [review] 9..Ehrenpreis S. Analgesic properties of enkephalinase inhibitors: animal and human studies. Prog Clin Biol Res 1985;192:363–70. 10..Guisti P, Carrara M, Cima L, Borin G. Antinociceptive effect of some carboxypeptidase A inhibitors in comparison with D-phenylalanine. Eur J Pharmacol 1985;116:287–92 11.. Walsh NE, Ramamurthy S, Schoenfeld LS, Hoffman J. D-phenylalanine was not found to exhibit opiod receptor mediated analgesia in monkeys. Pain 1986;26:409–10. 12..Shpeen SE, Morse DR, Furst ML. The effect of tryptophan on post-operative endodontic pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58: 446–9. 13..Seltzer S, Dewart D, Pollack RL, Jackson E. The effects of dietary tryptophan on chronic maxillofacial pain and experimental pain tolerance. J Psychiatr Res 1982–83;17(2):185–6. 14..Hanck A, Weiser H. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of vitamins. Int J Vitam Nutr Res Suppl 1985;27:189–206. 15..Hieber H. Treatment of vertebragenous pain and sensitivity disorders using high doses of hydroxocobalamin. Med Monatsschr 1974;28:545–8 16..Santos AR, Calixto JB. Ruthenium red and capsazepine antinociceptive effect in formalin and capsaicin models of pain in mice. Neurosci Lett. 1997;235:73–6. ©2011 Wild Rose College of Natural Healing 4 All Rights Reserved. Western Materia Medica Pain By Terry Willard ClH, PhD Botanicals 17..Otsuki T, Nakahama H, Niizuma H, Suzuki J. Evaluation of the analgesic effects of capsaicin using a new rat model for tonic pain. Brain Res 1986;365:235–40. 18..Nolano M, Simone DA, Wendelschafer-Crabb G, et al. Topical capsaicin in humans: parallel loss of epidermal nerve fibers and pain sensation. Pain 1999;81:135–45. 19..Hautkappe M, Roizen MF, Toledano A, et al. Review of the effectiveness of capsaicin for painful cutaneous disorders and neural dysfunction. Clin J Pain 1998;14:97–106 [review] 20..Fusco BM, Giacovazzo M. Peppers and pain. The promise of capsaicin. Drugs 1997;53:909–14 [review]. 21..Robbins WR, Staats PS, Levine J, et al. Treatment of intractable pain with topical large-dose capsaicin: preliminary report. Anesth Analg 1998;86:579–83 22..Zhang WY, Li Wan Po A. The effectiveness of topically applied capsaicin. A meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1994;46:517–22 [review] 23..Ellison N, Loprinzi CL, Kugler J, et al. Phase III placebo-controlled trial of capsaicin cream in the management of surgical neuropathic pain in cancer patients.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA

    NJ Native Plants - USDA

    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
  • FINAL SCREENING LEVEL ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT EMMELL's SEPTIC LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY Work Assignment No

    FINAL SCREENING LEVEL ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT EMMELL's SEPTIC LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY Work Assignment No

    I SDMS Document 103078 FINAL SCREENING LEVEL ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT EMMELL'S SEPTIC LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY Work Assignment No. 135-RICO-02JW May 30, 2007 Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 290 BroadAvay ii New York, New York 10007-1866 Prepared by CDM Federal Programs Corporation 125 Maiden Lane, 5* Floor New York, New York 10038 EPA Work Assignment No. 135-RICO-02JW EPA Region 2 Contract No. 68-W-98-210 CDM Federal Programs Corporation Document No. : 3223-135-RA-ECRA-06698 Prepared by : CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION Site Manager Demetrios Klerides, P.E. Telephone Number (212) 785-9123 EPA Remedial Project Manager Joseph Gowers Telephone Number (212) 637-4413 Date Prepared May 30, 2007 P I 300598 Rantan Plaza I Raritan Center Edison, New Jersey 08818-3142 tel: 732 225-7000 fax: 732 225-6147 May 30, 2007 Mr. Joseph Gowers Remedial Project Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 290 Broadway - 20* Floor . New York, NY 10007-1866 PROJECT: RAC II Contiact No.: 68-W-98-210 Work Assignment No.: 135-RICO-02JW DOC CONTROL NO.: 3223-135-RA-ECRA-06698 SUBJECT: Final Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment Emmell's Septic Landfill Superfund Site Remedial Investiagation/Feasibility Study Galloway Township, New Jersey Dear Mr. Gowers: ii CDM Federal Programs Corporation (CDM) is pleased to submit seven bound and one lurbound copies of the Final Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment for the Emmell's Septic Landfill Superfund Site in. Galloway Township, New Jersey, as partial fulfillment of Subtask No. 7.2 of the Statement of Work.
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)

    Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)

    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva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ist of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park: 2014 Data Summary

    Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park: 2014 Data Summary

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 ON THIS PAGE Tiny, bright yellow blossoms of Hypoxis hirsuta grace the forest floor at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network. ON THE COVER Spiraling compound leaf of green dragon (Arisaema dracontium) at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 Sarah Corbett Heath1 and Michael W. Byrne2 1National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, GA 31558 2National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Drive Athens, GA 30605 May 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed.
  • Biodiversity of the Potomac River Valley

    Biodiversity of the Potomac River Valley

    Workbook: Biodiversity of the Potomac Valley (2009, March 2017, a work-in-progress still in need of editing, additions, corrections, etc.) Edward M. Barrows Laboratory of Biodiversity and Entomology, Georgetown Univerisity, Washington, D.C. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Table of Contents Introduction (Goals, Background, Disclaimers, Organism Names) Abbreviations and Definitions Archaea Bacteria Invertebrates except Arthropoda Arthropoda Chordata Nonflowering Plants Dicots Monocots Protista References Map Legion, Potomac Gorge in part. The Map is a PowerPoint file. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Our Goals Increase your scientific literacy in view of wise voting and total Earth Stewardship. Learn about local biodiversity. Learn about local plant communities. Pool our knowledge and update this workbook as a group. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This Workbook I started this little workbook in 2009 and update it over the years. This workbook is primarily an annotated list of local biota. I include selected information for each taxon. For full information you should consult reference books and scientific papers, some of which I list in the Literature parts of this handbook, and even Wikipedia. For some species, I include information from my forest ecology courses, such as specific ecological roles in forests. Please give me corrections, additions, suggestions, etc. A wonderful introduction to the biota of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Region is Alden, P., B. Cassie, J. D. W. Kahl, E. A. Oches, H. Zirlin, and W. B. Zomlefer. 2007. National Audubon Society. Field Guide to the Mid- Atlantic States. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY. 448 pp. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Background How do many biologists now classify life from large through small taxonomic groups (= taxa)? (domain, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species, subspecies (variety and forma in plants) and categories between the larger categories) Table 1.
  • THOMAS WALTER CAROLINA BOTANIST by David H

    THOMAS WALTER CAROLINA BOTANIST by David H

    li\1'7 ~s- .3.e r, t~- J'U>.~ tAf· ,_ f'QIJ ·- • .~ j v b 1980 ST/nT DOCUMENr THOMAS WALTER CAROLINA BOTANIST by David H. Rembert IXpartment ci Biology University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina -.~ MUSEUM BULLETIN NUMBER 5 SOUTH CAROLINA MUSEUM COMMISSION W~preJ tptnS ~~PJ ~U~preJ tplnS JO Al~WA~Uf1 Afupgpl~ LSINVJDH VNI101IVJ 1ItiL1V& SVWOHL Copyright © 1980 by the South Carolina Museum CommissiOn, Columbia, S. C. 2 • THOMAS WALTER (From a miniature in the possession of a direct descendant, Mrs. Benjamin Arthur Bolt of Greenville, South Carolina) 3 PREFACE Gradually over the last 200 years information has accumulated to illuminate the accomplishments of the early naturalists who visited Colonial South Carolina. These men added greatly to the rapid development of the young, emerging nation and provided the rich inventory of our botanical heritage. One such man was Thomas Walter. It is hoped that this paper will help move this 18th-century botanist a little closer to his rightful place in the annals of science. During the course of this investigation, I have received help and encouragement and it is in that context that I should like to thank the members of the staff at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History and at the South Caroliniana Library for their help. I am also indebted to Mrs. D. Scott, Deputy Librarian at the Herbarium, Kew, England for transcribing the letter from Walter to Mr. William Forsyth and to Mr. John Lewis, PSO at the British Museum of Natural History, for his kindness during my visits there.
  • Natural Resource Condition Assessment Congaree National Park

    Natural Resource Condition Assessment Congaree National Park

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Congaree National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2018/1665 ON THE COVER A quiet gut off Weston Lake Trail, Congaree National Park Photograph by Stacie Flood. Natural Resource Condition Assessment Congaree National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2018/1665 JoAnn M. Burkholder, Elle H. Allen, Carol A. Kinder, and Stacie Flood Center for Applied Aquatic Ecology North Carolina State University 620 Hutton Street, Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27606 June 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.

  • C:\Documents and Settings\Garlanm1\My Documents

    NOTES ON FLORIDA’S ENDANGERED AND THREATENED PLANTS1 4th Edition, August 2003 Nancy C. Coile2 updated by Mark A. Garland3 The following tables were compiled Descriptions of these rare species Distribution maps (Wunderlin and Fish and Wildlife Service; Bruce D. to provide a convenient source of are often difficult to locate. Florida Hansen, 2000) are available over the Sutton, DPI, carnivorous plants; descriptions and other information does not have a single manual Internet from the University of Kathy Craddock Burks, Department on the endangered, threatened and covering the flora of the entire state. South Florida Herbarium of Environmental Protection; Donald commercially exploited plant species Long and Lakela’s manual (1971) [http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu/]. Drapalik, Georgia Southern on Florida’s ‘Regulated Plant focuses on the area south of Glades These maps were invaluable for University, angle-pods; John D. Index.’ County; Clewell (1985) is a guide determining county distributions as Tobe, Department of Environmental for the Panhandle; and Wunderlin was information from the Florida Protection, magnolias; Robert R. The Regulated Plant Index is based (1998) is a guide for the entire state Natural Areas Inventory. Haynes, University of Alabama, on information provided by the of Florida but lacks descriptions. slender naiad. Endangered Plant Advisory Council Small (1933) is an excellent Many thanks are given to: Penny L. (EPAC), a group of seven resource, but must be used with McCurry for help with publishing Update: The Update, which individuals who represent academic, great care since the nomenclature is matters; Sharon E. Gatlin for help immediately follows this industry, and environmental interests outdated and frequently disputed.
  • New Jersey's Threatened Plant Species

    New Jersey's Threatened Plant Species

    New Jersey's Threatened Plant Species PROPERTY OF NEW JERSEY D.E.P. INFORMATION RESOURCE CENTER DEP QK 86 .Nif5 S69 1985 N.J. D.E.P. · Division of Parks and Forestry .tEP PROPERTY Of NEW JERSEY wrc-t D.E.P. INFORMATION 8~-: RESOURCE CENTER .. Ni ........ ~9 NEW JERSEY'S Fl()5 THREATENED PLANT SPECIES ,_.,, I OFFICE OF NATURAL LANDS MANAGEMENT CN 404 109 WEST STATE STREET TRENTON, NJ 08625 AUGUST, 1984 (REVISED - JANUARY 1985) THOMAS H. KEAN ROBERT E. HUGHEY GOVERNOR COMMISSIONER Preparation of this booklet was made possible by the New Jersey Green Acres Program, which provided consultant's fees, and the State of New Jersey Natural Lands Trust, which contributed to printing costs . NEW JERSEY'S THREATENED PLANT SPECIES PREFACE The following list was prepared by David B. Snyder, Consultant, for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Natural Lands Management (ONLM). Our objective in contracting with Mr. Snyder was to obtain a prioritized up-to-date list of those species that ONLM should consider of immediate importance for protection efforts. It is used internally for natural resource planning and management practices and is available to the public. We hope that this list will increase public awareness of this neglected feature of our natural heritage and also stimulate public involvement in plant protection at the local level. It is important to note that this list is not official, as no legislation currently exists mandating its formation or providing protection for these species. Also, the State has not attempted to obtain internal or public review of the list.
  • Karl Anderson 2009 Plant List INTRODUCTION This Check List Of

    Karl Anderson 2009 Plant List INTRODUCTION This Check List Of

    Karl Anderson 2009 Plant List INTRODUCTION This Check List of the Plants of New Jersey has been compiled by updating and integrating the catalogs prepared by such authors as Nathaniel Lord Britton (1881 and 1889), Witmer Stone (1911), and Norman Taylor (1915) with such other sources as recently-published local lists, field trip reports of the Torrey Botanical Society and the Philadelphia Botanical Club, the New Jersey Natural Heritage Program’s list of threatened and endangered plants, personal observations in the field and the herbarium, and observations by other competent field botanists. The Check List includes 2,790 species and hybrids, a botanical diversity that is rather unexpected in a small state like New Jersey. Of these, 1,976 are plants that are (or were) native to the state - still a large number, and one that reflects New Jersey's habitat diversity. The balance are plants that have been introduced from other countries or from other parts of North America. The list could be lengthened by several hundred species by including non-persistent garden escapes and obscure waifs and ballast plants that have not been seen in New Jersey since the nineteenth century, but it would be misleading to do so. The Check List should include all the plants that are truly native to New Jersey, plus all the introduced species that are naturalized here or for which there are relatively recent records, as well as many introduced plants of very limited occurrence. But no claims are made for the absolute perfection of the list. Plant nomenclature is constantly being revised.
  • Natureserve Rare Plant Prioritization North Atlantic LCC Final Report

    Natureserve Rare Plant Prioritization North Atlantic LCC Final Report

    Final Report* To the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative Grant Title Prioritization and Conservation Status of Rare Plants in the North Atlantic Grant Program and Number Grant NALCC, 2015-7 Organization NatureServe Project Leader Anne Frances [email protected] Abstract The North Atlantic Region of the United States and Canada boasts diverse habitats, from coasts to mountains, that support endemic and rare plant species. However, recent conservation actions and prioritization efforts in this region have neglected to include plants. We conducted a broad-scale conservation assessment for vascular plants that occur in the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NALCC). The primary outcome is a prioritized list of rare, highly threatened, declining, or sensitive plant species identified for conservation action. In close collaboration with Natural Heritage Botanists and other partners, we developed a list of vascular plant taxa of conservation concern for the region. We used the best available scientific data including Element Occurrences, published literature, and expert knowledge to develop a comprehensive list of over 3,135 vascular plant taxa for prioritization. This list of potential taxa was narrowed to approximately 1,200 taxa that were evaluated for their conservation priority in the North Atlantic region. For each taxon, we developed regional ranks (R-ranks), updated Global Ranks, documented threats and trends, and identified gaps in conservation knowledge. Of the evaluated taxa, 431 had R-ranks of R1 (Regionally Critically Imperiled), R2 (Regionally Imperiled), or R3 (Regionally Vulnerable). This group of 431 vascular plants were determined to be the highest conservation priorities for the NALCC. *This report was revised December 2017 to clarify methodology for obtaining spatial data under the section “Generating a Comprehensive List of Rare Vascular Plants” under Objective One.