Dahuk, Erbil& Sulaymaniyah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

DAHUK, ERBIL& SULAYMANIYAH GOVERNORATE PROFILES POST-FEBRUARY 2006 IDP NEEDS ASSESSMENTS JUNE 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section: Page: I. IOM Assessment Background 1 Dahuk il rb II. Overview 2 E S 1. Area Background u la a y 2. Restrictions on IDP Entry or Registration ew m in a N n iy 3. Ethnicity and Religion a h 4. Places of Origin Kirkuk 5. Reasons for Displacement S al 6. Pre-2006 IDP Population ah a l- Di D n iy 7. IDP Relations w/ Host Community a 8. IDP Intentions la III. Emergency Assessment and Needs 5 Baghdad 1. Security 5 Kerbala Wassit Babylon Q Security, Vulnerabilities, Women and Children ad Anbar is si 2. Shelter and Basic Services 7 ya Shelter (living arrangements), Evictions, Missan Thi-Qar Food/PDS, Water and Sanitation, Fuel and Najaf Electricity, Health Care, Education, Employment Basrah Muthanna 3. Legal 12 Property Issues and Documentation IV. Humanitarian Assistance Received 13 V. Priority Needs 13 Top Priority Needs, JOC Project Recommendations VI. Conclusion 15 VII. Maps 17 I. POST-FEBRUARY 2006 IDP ASSESSMENTS: BACKGROUND Iraq has a long history of displacement; over 5 million Iraqis have been forced to flee their homes to seek refuge internally or abroad. Policies carried out by Saddam’s regime, including the draining of the marshes in the south, the “Arabization” and “Anfal” campaigns, in addition to infighting and wars, caused the internal displacement of over one million people by 2003. Military operations were the primary cause of internal displacement between 2003 and 2005, and around 200,000 people still remain displaced from this period. However, the most alarming rate of displacement occurred after the February 2006 bombing of the Samarra Al-Askari Mosque. Due primarily to sectarian violence, 1.6 million people were internally displaced in the past two years alone, according to government figures.1 It is estimated that 2.3 – 2.5 million Iraqis have fled abroad. IOM is conducting on-going, in-depth assessments of recently displaced persons throughout Iraq. Monitors use Rapid Assessment questionnaires to gather information from IDP families, the Ministry of Displacement and Migration (MoDM), IDP tribal and community leaders, local NGOs, and local government bodies. Based on a database of this information, IOM disseminates bi-weekly, bi-annual, and annual reports containing updates, statistics, and analysis on displacement.2 This information assists IOM and other organizations in prioritizing areas of operation, planning emergency responses and designing long-term programs. This is one of six Iraq Governorate Profile reports released by IOM biyearly, which analyze the displacement situation in each Iraqi governorate. 1 Based on information provided by MoDM and the Kurdistan Regional Government. See latest IDP Working Group Update on IDPs, June 2007. 2 IOM reports are available at http://www.iom-iraq.net/idp.html. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION II. OVERVIEW Dahuk Erbil Sulaymaniyah Capital Dahuk Erbil Sulaymaniyah Choman, Erbil, Koisnjaq, Chamchamal, Darbandihkan, Amedi, Dahuk, Sumel, Makhmur (officially in Kirkuk Dokan, Halabja, Kalar, Districts Zakho but administered by KRG), Penjwin, Pshdar, Rania, Mergasur, Shaqlawa, Soran Sharbazher, Sulaymaniya Population3 954,087 1,392,093 1,715,585 4 18,733 families (est. 104,948 10,339 families (est. 62,034 14,254 families (est. 79,672 Total post-Feb 2006 IDPs individuals) individuals) individuals) 5 22,474 families (est. 134,844 32,813 families (est. 196,878 50,465 families (est. 302,790 Total pre-Feb 2006 IDPs individuals) individuals) individuals) Number of post-Feb 2006 2,981 families (est. 17,886 4,476 families (est. 26,856 4,886 families (est. 29,316 IDPs assessed by IOM6 individuals) individuals) individuals) 1. Area Background The northern governorates of Dahuk, Erbil, and Sulaymaniyah comprise the most stable area in Iraq and operate in a de facto autonomy under the authority of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). However, the area is not immune to instability and violence. The areas along the border with Iran and Turkey experience intermittent shelling and attacks, which have displaced hundreds of families over the past two years. In March, a car bomb outside of a popular hotel in Sulaymaniyah killed one person and wounded scores more. However, the north’s relative stability makes it a destination for IDPs of all ethnicities and religions fleeing from the south and center. But increased restrictions of entry into the north make movement difficult. KRG authorities are wary of the demographic changes displacement may cause and are conscious of the heavy burden IDP influx is placing on the area’s limited resources and infrastructure. The area’s relative stability has attracted a large international presence, with many humanitarian organizations basing their Iraq operations in Erbil city. Dahuk lies at the very northern tip of Iraq, bordered by Turkey. It has the largest number of post- 2006 IDPs of the three governorates and the least number of pre-2006 IDPs. Erbil city, the capital Erbil governorate and the Kurdistan region, is believed to be one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world and a major stop on the Silk Road. It is growing rapidly and is a popular destination for IDPs. Many humanitarian organizations working in Iraq are based here. Sulaymaniyah is bordered by Iran and hosts the most IDP population for pre-2006 IDPs of the northern governorates and the largest number of pre-2006 IDPs of any governorate in Iraq. It is an important economic center for Iraq and has strong economic ties with Iran. 2. Restrictions on IDP Entry or Registration IDPs who do not originate from Dahuk, Erbil, or Sulaymaniyah must be sponsored by a resident from the three governorates. Once in the KRG region, IDPs must obtain temporary residency permission by registering with several different government authorities including the Residency Office, the Security Office, the Department of Displacement and Migration, and the office of the 3 As per the Iraq Living Conditions Survey, UNDP and Ministry of Planning and Development Cooperation, 2004. 4 As per the Kurdistan Regional Government. See latest IDP Working Group Update on IDPs, June 2007. 5 As per UNOPs/UNHCR, December 2005. See latest IDP Working Group Update on IDPs, June 2007. 6 Please note that this is the number of post-February 2006 IDPs assessed by IOM, not the total number of IDPs in the governorate. 2 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION local mayor. The borders of Dahuk, Erbil, and Sulaymaniyah continue to be tightly controlled to maintain the relatively high level of stable security in the region. In some cases IDPs may be turned away, and they are generally not permitted to bring furniture into Dahuk with them. Registered numbers of IDPs remain problematic because of lack of coordination between KRG immigration authorities and those in Baghdad. In addition, some IDPs may be moving out of Kurdistan or returning to their homes without informing the government for fear of having their temporary residence permission revoked. 3. Ethnicity and Religion Compared to the rest of the country, a large number of Chaldean and Assyrian Christians, as well as Kurdish Sunnis, have fled to the north, while much fewer Shia Arabs have chosen to flee to these governorates. RELIGION & ETHNICITY Dahuk Erbil Sulaymaniyah Area All Iraq Sunni Arab 2.4% 21.8% 64.1% 34.1% 27.9% Christian Chaldean 31.5% 23.5% 0.2% 16.0% 2.0% Sunni Kurd 35.6% 39.7% 22.2% 31.6% 3.4% Christian Assyrian 20.8% 5.9% 0.04% 7.2% 3.3% Shia Arab 2.1% 1.6% 9.8% 5.0% 60.0% Christian Armenian 4.0% 1.1% 0.02% 1.4% 0.1% Shia Kurd 0.2% 0.0% 2.5% 1.1% 0.7% Christian Kurd/Other/Arab 0.4% 2.9% 0.1% 1.0% 0.1% Sunni Turkmen 0.4% 0.5% 0.3% 0.4% 1% Yazidi Kurd 0.04% 0.00% 0.4% 0.2% 0.00% Sabean Mandean 0.03% 0.18% 0.3% 0.2% 0.02% Other 0.0% 0.8% 0.1% 0.3% 0.02% 4. Places of Origin Dahuk !. il rb E 0.12%!. S u la For both Dahuk and Erbil, the largest percentage of IDPs a !. y ew m in a N 47.71% n continues to come from Baghdad (58% and 45%, Kirkuk iy!. a 2.33%!. h respectively) and Ninewa (30% and 48%). In 0.80%!. Sulaymaniyah, the largest percentage now comes from S al ah a !. l-D D Baghdad (51%), whereas most used to come from Diyala in 1.79% i y a la !. (now at 42%). 45.30% Baghdad 0.68% !. !. !. Kerbala Was !. 0.07%0.09% sit !. Babylon Q Dahuk a il d Anbar is !. rb s 0.02%!. i E ya !. S Missan u !. la !. y a !.0.05% ew m Thi-Qar in a Najaf N 1.78% n !. Kirkuk 0.12%iy Dahuk !. Basrah a il !. h b 0.09% r !. 0.16% 0.64% E !. Muthanna !. S u 0.93% l !. 40.39% 0.03% a a !. y S ew m al in a ah N n i al !. !.y -D D Kirkuk a i h n iy !. 50.68% a la 0.76% !. 41.50% 0.07%!. Baghdad S 3.05% 0.12% al !. ah !. a !. l- !. 0.06% Wa Di D !. 0.46% ssit n 0.03% iy a Kerbala BabylonQ l a a di 57.65% Anbar ss !. !. !. i ya Baghdad Thi-Qar Missan !. !. !. 0.41% Kerbala 0.03%!. Wassit !. 0.10% !. BabylonQ Najaf ad Anbar is !. si Basrah !. ya !. 0.44%!. Missan Muthanna !. !. Thi-Qar Najaf Basrah 0.07% !. 0.55%!. Muthanna 3 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION 5.
Recommended publications
  • Sulaymaniyah Governorate Profile November 2010

    Sulaymaniyah Governorate Profile November 2010

    Sulaymaniyah Governorate Profile November 2010 Overview Located in the north east of Iraq on the border with Iran, Sulaymaniyah combines with Erbil and Dahuk governorates to form the area administrated by the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). Sulaymaniyah contains the third largest share of the population, which is one of the most urbanized in Iraq. The landscape becomes increasingly mountainous towards the eastern border with Iran. Unemployment is relatively low in the governorate at 12%. However, the relatively high unemployment (27%) among women, the low proportion of women employed in wage jobs outside agriculture, allied to the relatively low percentage of jobs for women in the public sector implies that women face barriers to employment in non-agricultural sectors. Sulaymaniyah’s economy has potential advantages due to the governorate’s plentiful natural water supplies, favourable climate and peaceful security situation. Commercial flights have been operational between Sulaymaniyah and cities in the Middle East and Europe since 2005. However, poor infrastructure and bureaucratic barriers to private sector investment are hindering development. Few of Sulaymaniyah’s residents (3%) are among Iraq’s poorest, but the governorate performs badly according to many other developmental and humanitarian indicators. Education levels are generally below average: illiteracy rates among women are approaching 50% in all districts apart from Sulaymaniyah and Halabja, and are above 25% for men in Penjwin, Pshdar, Kifri and Chamchamal. 14% of Kifri and Demographics Chamchamal’s residents suffer from a chronic diseases. There are also . widespread infrastructural problems, with all districts suffering from Governorate Capital: Sulaymaniyah prolonged power cuts, and Penjwin, Said Sadik, Kardagh and Area: 17,023 sq km (3.9% of Iraq) Sharbazher experiencing poor access to the water network.
  • "Where There Is a Promise, There Is a Tragedy"

    "Where There Is a Promise, There Is a Tragedy"

    "Where there is a promise, there is a tragedy" Cross-border bombings and shellings of villages in the Kurdish region of Iraq by the nations of Turkey and Iran TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT) – Iraq . 4 Introduction . 5 Part I Recent Turkish and Iranian Military Attacks into Iraq: December, 2007 – December 2009. ………………….. 7 Part II Violation of International Laws. 24 Part III A Brief History of Iraqi Kurdish/Turkish Relations. .. 31 Photographs of villagers of Zharawa . 41 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Glossary of abbreviations. 44 Appendix 2 Military Action Calendar (August, 2008 – June, 2009). 46 Appendix 3 Turkish bases in Iraq . 52 Appendix 4 Maps . 54 __________________ Cover Art from the Kurdish Textile Museum: a sample of Iraqi Kurdish textile weaving of the Keji design. The weaving, made of wool, contains a pre-historic symbol for peace and happiness. This piece is from a belt. The belt, traditionally made by young girls or their mothers, is used to tie the girl's dowry together. The title quotation for the report is from the grandfather of a Kurdish friend of CPT; it means that every time governments have promised something to the Kurds, a tragedy inevitably followed. - 2 - Dedication The authors wish to dedicate this report to the over 1 million displaced villagers that have entrusted us with their tears and sorrow, hopes and dreams and their desire to return to a life of dignity. During the 2 year period in which CPT collected the research for this report, we have come to love and respect these villagers. We recognize their tremendous determination and tenacity to preserve village life and their desire to be contributing members of Kurdish society within the KRG.
  • Iraq: Opposition to the Government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI)

    Iraq: Opposition to the Government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI)

    Country Policy and Information Note Iraq: Opposition to the government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Version 2.0 June 2021 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
  • Substance Use Among High School Students in Erbil City, Iraq: Prevalence and Potential Contributing Factors

    Substance Use Among High School Students in Erbil City, Iraq: Prevalence and Potential Contributing Factors

    Research article EMHJ – Vol. 25 No. 11 – 2019 Substance use among high school students in Erbil City, Iraq: prevalence and potential contributing factors Nazar Mahmood,1 Samir Othman,1 Namir Al-Tawil 1 and Tariq Al-Hadithi1 1Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq (Correspondence to: Nazar A. Mahmood: [email protected]). Abstract Background: Substance use among adolescents, especially smoking and alcohol consumption, has become a public health concern in the Kurdistan Region, Iraq, in the past 10 years. Aims: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of substance use and certain associated factors among high school students in Erbil City, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a multistage cluster sampling technique to collect a sample of 3000 students. A modified version of the School Survey on Drug Use from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime was used for data collection. Binary logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for substance use. Results: The lifetime prevalence rates of cigarettes smoking, waterpipe smoking and alcohol consumption were 27.6%, 23.6% and 3.7%, respectively. Male gender, age 17–19 years, smoker in the family, and easy accessibility of cigarettes were significantly associated with cigarette smoking. Factors significantly associated with waterpipe smoking were male gen- der, age 17–19 years, waterpipe smoker in the family, waterpipe smoker friend, and easy accessibility. Male gender, alco- hol dependent in the family, alcohol-dependent friend, easy accessibility of alcohol, and low family income were signifi- cant predictors of alcohol consumption.
  • Multi-Cluster/Sector Initial Assessment Report Idps RESPONSE in IRAQ

    Multi-Cluster/Sector Initial Assessment Report Idps RESPONSE in IRAQ

    MIRA Multi-Cluster/Sector Initial Assessment Report IDPs RESPONSE IN IRAQ PROVINCE OF NINEWAH AND ERBIL Conducted by PAO On behalf of June 17-23rd Contents 1. Background page 4 2. Objectives page 5 3. Methodology page 6 4. Key Findings by sector page 8 CP page 8 Shelter /NFI page 11 WASH page 12 Food Security & Livelihood page 13 Health Page 15 MIRA Assessment Page 3 1. Background THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS Save the Children (SC) has been working on the humanitarian crisis caused by the influx of Syrian refugees in Iraq since the start of Syrian crisis. The organization has responded to the crisis via support to refugees in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon. With the new crisis caused by ISIS in Mosul and Ambar provinces in Iraq, SC has a humanitarian imperative to intensify its response within the country, requiring assistance to internally displaced people (IDP). SC has also partnered with national based organizations to reach off limit places due to security challenges. People Aid Organization (PAO) has conducted the assessment on behalf of Save the Children from June 17th to June 23rd 2014. PAO organization has been working on responding to the crisis in Syria since September 2013 through “protection and humanitarian aid program”, in which PAO in partnership with international non-governmental organizations and UN agencies which have worked on child protection and humanitarian assistants in both Iraq and Syria. SCI and PAO have worked jointly during Syria crisis to response to the needs of children in the north of Iraq and north east Syria. Additionally, with the start of recent crisis in Nenawa and other provinces in Iraq, both SCI and PAO have worked closely to identify and respond to the needs of children.
  • Freedom of Expression in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

    Freedom of Expression in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

    @ Metro Centre; Hevi Khalid (Sulaymaniyah December 2020) Freedom of Expression in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights May 2021 Baghdad, Iraq “Recent years have seen progress towards a democratic Kurdistan Region where freedom of expression and the rule of law are valued. But democratic societies need media, activists and critics to be able to report on public issues without censorship or fear, and citizens also have a right to be informed.” - UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet, 12 May 2021 “Transparency, accountability and openness to questioning is vital for any healthy democracy.” - Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Iraq, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, 12 May 2021 2 Contents I. Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Mandate ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 III. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal Framework .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 i. Applicable International
  • From Amphipolis to Mosul, New Approaches to Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Eastern Mediterranean

    From Amphipolis to Mosul, New Approaches to Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Eastern Mediterranean

    THE FUTURE OF THE PAST: From Amphipolis to Mosul, New Approaches to Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Eastern Mediterranean Editors Konstantinos Chalikias, Maggie Beeler, Ariel Pearce, and Steve Renette http://futureofthepast.wix.com/culturalheritage HERITAGE, CONSERVATION & ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA Contents 1. The Future of the Past: From Amphipolis to Mosul, New Approaches to Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Eastern Mediterranean .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Konstantinos Chalikias, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Maggie Beeler, Bryn Mawr College, Ariel Pearce, Temple University, and Steve Renette, University of Pennsylvania 2. Go, Do Good! Responsibility and the Future of Cultural Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean in the 21st Century ........... 5 Morag M. Kersel, DePaul University 3. Contested Antiquities, Contested Histories: The City of David as an Example ........................................................................... 11 Rannfrid I. Thelle, Wichita State University 4. Cultural Racketeering in Egypt—Predicting Patterns in Illicit Activity: Quantitative Tools of the 21st-Century Archaeologist .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Katie A. Paul, The Antiquities Coalition
  • Babylonian Populations, Servility, and Cuneiform Records

    Babylonian Populations, Servility, and Cuneiform Records

    Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 60 (2017) 715-787 brill.com/jesh Babylonian Populations, Servility, and Cuneiform Records Jonathan S. Tenney Cornell University [email protected] Abstract To date, servility and servile systems in Babylonia have been explored with the tradi- tional lexical approach of Assyriology. If one examines servility as an aggregate phe- nomenon, these subjects can be investigated on a much larger scale with quantitative approaches. Using servile populations as a point of departure, this paper applies both quantitative and qualitative methods to explore Babylonian population dynamics in general; especially morbidity, mortality, and ages at which Babylonians experienced important life events. As such, it can be added to the handful of publications that have sought basic demographic data in the cuneiform record, and therefore has value to those scholars who are also interested in migration and settlement. It suggests that the origins of servile systems in Babylonia can be explained with the Nieboer-Domar hy- pothesis, which proposes that large-scale systems of bondage will arise in regions with * This was written in honor, thanks, and recognition of McGuire Gibson’s efforts to impart a sense of the influence of aggregate population behavior on Mesopotamian development, notably in his 1973 article “Population Shift and the Rise of Mesopotamian Civilization”. As an Assyriology student who was searching texts for answers to similar questions, I have occasionally found myself in uncharted waters. Mac’s encouragement helped me get past my discomfort, find the data, and put words on the page. The necessity of assembling Mesopotamian “demographic” measures was something made clear to me by the M.A.S.S.
  • Diyala Governorate, Kifri District

    Diyala Governorate, Kifri District

    ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Iraq- Diyala Governorate, Kifri( District ( ( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( Daquq District ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Omar Sofi Kushak ( Kani Ubed Chachan Nawjul IQ-P23893 IQ-P05249 Kharabah داﻗوق ) ) IQ-P23842 ( ( IQ-P23892 ( Chamchamal District ( Galalkawa ( IQ-P04192 Turkey Haji Namiq Razyana Laki Qadir IQ-D074 Shekh Binzekhil IQ-P05190 IQ-P05342 ) )! ) ﺟﻣﺟﻣﺎل ) Sarhang ) Changalawa IQ-P05159 Mosul ! Hawwazi IQ-P04194 Alyan Big Kozakul IQ-P16607 IQ-P23914 IQ-P05137 Erbil IQ-P05268 Sarkal ( Imam IQ-D024 ( Qawali ( ( Syria ( IranAziz ( Daquq District Muhammad Garmk Darka Hawara Raqa IQ-P05354 IQ-P23872 IQ-P05331 Albu IQ-P23854 IQ-P05176 IQ-P052B2a6 ghdad Sarkal ( ( ( ( ( ! ( Sabah [2] Ramadi ( Piramoni Khapakwer Kaka Bra Kuna Kotr G!\amakhal Khusraw داﻗوق ) ( IQ-P23823 IQ-P05311 IQ-P05261 IQ-P05235 IQ-P05270 IQ-P05191 IQ-P05355 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Jordan ( ( ! ( ( ( IQ-D074 Bashtappa Bash Tappa Ibrahim Big Qala Charmala Hawara Qula NaGjafoma Zard Little IQ-P23835 IQ-P23869 IQ-P05319 IQ-P05225 IQ-P05199 ( IQ-P23837 ( Bashtappa Warani ( ( Alyan ( Ahmadawa ( ( Shahiwan Big Basrah! ( Gomatzbor Arab Agha Upper Little Tappa Spi Zhalan Roghzayi Sarnawa IQ-P23912 IQ-P23856 IQ-P23836 IQ-P23826 IQ-P23934 IQ-P05138 IQ-P05384 IQ-P05427 IQ-P05134 IQ-P05358 ( Hay Al Qala [1] ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Ibrahim Little ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Ta'akhi IQ-P23900 Tepe Charmuk Latif Agha Saudi ArabiaKhalwa Kuwait IQ-P23870 Zhalan ( IQ-P23865 IQ-P23925 ( ( IQ-P23885 Sulaymaniyah Governorate Roghzayi IQ-P05257 ( ( ( ( ( Wa(rani
  • IRAQ: MONTHLY PROTECTION UPDATE 28 May - 1 July 2018

    IRAQ: MONTHLY PROTECTION UPDATE 28 May - 1 July 2018

    IRAQ: MONTHLY PROTECTION UPDATE 28 May - 1 July 2018 PROTECTION HIGHLIGHTS: At least 2,258 families departed camps and informal settlements for their areas of origin and other locations. Many returns continue to be premature with many families who had tried to return home or relocate, returning to camps because they were unable to cope. Denial of return of families with perceived affiliations with extremists continue to be reported in Anbar, Kirkuk, Ninewa and Salah al-Din governorates. In addition, some facilitated returns left families in secondary displacement due to insufficient coordination with local security actors in the IDPs’ area of origin. Threats of forced evictions and relocations were reported in several camps and three informal settlements in Salah al-Din. Confiscation of legal documents to pressure families to return has also been reported on several occasions. Affected Population 3.8 million to their of origin while 2 million are still displaced in Center-South areas. Protection Monitoring* 151,847 740,498 38% of families with no income 3,225 unaccompanied or separated children 21% of families missing civil documentation * The data reflects people displaced in Centre-South governorates after March 2016 . Disclaimer: The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the united nations. Security developments and displacement tor the implementation of the Prime Minister’s Office directive on ‘’Maintaining the civilian char- During the reporting period, numerous security incidents including clashes between extremist acter of camps” from April 2017. and military or government-affiliated armed groups were reported in Ninewa and different parts of the Centre/South of Iraq.
  • Erbil Governorate Profile Overview2 May 2015

    Erbil Governorate Profile Overview2 May 2015

    ERBIL GOVERNORATE PROFILE OVERVIEW2 MAY 2015 41,313 IDP FAMILIES 2,592 IDP families 6% IDP camps 1 total population: 6,598 individuals 247,878 IDP INDIVIDUALS planned: 13,732 individuals Syrian refugee camps 110, 378 SYRIAN REFUGEE 8,756 IDP families DISPLACEMENT OVER TIME INDIVIDUALS 21% 41,313 Darashakran 45,000 SUM OF IDPFAMILIES 38% OF ALL IDPS ARE UNDER 14 35,758 Basirma 40,000 Kawergosk 32,324 33,181 26,681 IDP families 32,604 65% 35,000 31,324 1,575 IDP families 28,424 26,087 GOVERNORATE OF ORIGIN Baharka 4% 30,000 Ankawa 2 26,014 Harsham 1,709 IDP families 25,000 19,734 4% 20,000 IDPs in I 23% 27% all ra f q Qushtapa 15,000 o % 10,000 3,328 9 Debaga 3,643 3,245 5,000 - 17% 33% 99% MOST COMMON SHELTER TYPE INTENTIONS Anbar Diyala Erbil Ninewa Salah al Din Soran 100% WAVES OF DISPLACEMENT Shaqlawa 94% 2% Makhmur 47% 53% 17% 9%14% Koisnjaq 57% 43% Rented Host Families Informal settle- Erbil 90% 10% housing 70% 8,5% ments 7% Gov Total 88% 11% Iraq 89% 8% TOP PRIORITY NEEDS 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 29% 40% 1 1 2 3 4 Return to Area of Past Displacement Return4 to place of origin 90% Waiting on one or several factors Locally integrate in current location Access Food Water Health Shelter Moving and integrating in a different location outside of Iraq Pre June 14 June July 14 to income Resettle in a third location 14-Aug Post September14 1.
  • The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict

    The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict

    The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict Dave van Zoonen Khogir Wirya About MERI The Middle East Research Institute engages in policy issues contributing to the process of state building and democratisation in the Middle East. Through independent analysis and policy debates, our research aims to promote and develop good governance, human rights, rule of law and social and economic prosperity in the region. It was established in 2014 as an independent, not-for-profit organisation based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Middle East Research Institute 1186 Dream City Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq T: +964 (0)662649690 E: [email protected] www.meri-k.org NGO registration number. K843 © Middle East Research Institute, 2017 The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of MERI, the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publisher. The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict MERI Policy Paper Dave van Zoonen Khogir Wirya October 2017 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................4 2. “Reconciliation” after genocide .........................................................................................................5