DOCSLIB.ORG

Destination Fall Creek Scheduling & Funding Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Destination Fall Creek Scheduling & Funding Plan DESTINATION FALL CREEK SCHEDULING & FUNDING PLAN July 2013 Funded by LISC and the Indianapolis Foundation (an affiliate of CICF) in partnership with MFCDC, KPADC, NNDC & UNEDC DESTINATION FALL CREEK SCHEDULING & FUNDING PLAN July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4......................REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS 5......................BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY 8......................FALL CREEK GREENWAY TRAILHEAD AT 38TH STREET 10....................MONON ACCESS 12....................DELAWARE STREET GATEWAY 14....................MERIDIAN STREET CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS DESTINATION FALL CREEK SCHEDULING & FUNDING PLAN AREAS OF ANALYSIS DESTINATION FALL CREEK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN As the planning team became better aquainted with ! ! ! ! ! Destination Fall Creek, it became apparent that the FALL CREEK PARKWAY AS A COMPLETE STREET ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! planning area was made up of a series of areas with ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Currently, Fall Creek Parkway is not a complete street. In fact, it ! ! ! different qualities created by particular combinations or ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! types of land use, different histories, unique assets and ! ! ! is a Primary Arterial that moves a high volume of through traffic ! ! ! ! ! ! ! challenges. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! at high speeds and does not primarily function to serve abutting ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! The areas are a planning tool, and not meant to have ! ! ! ! ! 1! land uses, A road diet can transform the parkway into a complete ! ! hard and definite edges. They do not necessarily respect ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! CDC or planning area boundaries, and are instead meant ! ! ! ! street, supporting pedestrian and cyclist movement throughout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! to roughly capture an area where an idea makes sense. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! the Fall Creek corridor and attracting private development to DFC. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! For each area, the opportunities and constraints start to ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! suggest an idea about the identity of the place and the ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! way to move forward there. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Road diets are used to reduce the number of vehicular travel lanes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! and/or effective width to achieve systemic improvements in an ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! area. Road diets commonly improve safety or provide space for ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! other users to create a complete street. This space can be used to ! 3 ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! provide new sidewalks or widen existing ones to make them more ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! accessible, to beautify an area with landscaping, to provide cycle ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! lanes or turning lanes for vehicular traffic, or to incorporate other ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! improvements, such as recreational trails. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ACCESSIBILITY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! against people with disabilities in employment, transportation, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! public accomodation, communications, and governmental ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 8 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! activities. Where it concerns connectivity in DFC, the American ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 9 7 ! ! ! Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (AASHTO) sets standards and publishes specifications, protocols, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! and guidelines to be used in transportation design and construction ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! throughout the United States. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 12 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! AASHTO provides several guides for creating ADA-compliant ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 ! .5 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MILES ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! transportation facilities, including sidewalks, street crossings, intersections, trails, outdoor recreation routes, and roads. 6 COMPLETE STREETS 0.5Complete Streets is a transportation policy andDFC design Boundary approach that requires streets to be • The Multi-Modal One-Way Commuter Corridor, which is the same as the Multi-Modal IMPACT OF RAPID TRANSIT ON DFC ¯ Miles Urban Commuter Corridor but is uni-directional. This typology may be appropriate for planned, designed, operated, and maintained to enable safe, convenient and comfortable The Market Analysis shows that the execution of the Indy Connect travel and access for users of all ages and abilities regardless of their mode of transportation. streets such as Capitol and Illinois. Noteworthy is the fact that the Capitol/Illinois couplet plan can greatly impact DFC (see Appendix pages C-68 and C-74). Complete streets allow for safe travel by pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and transit riders. may be the first Bus Rapid Transit Route instituted in the city. (see p. T.5b) Phase I of the plan shows three rapid transit lines passing near Fall Creek: the Purple Line along 38th Street, the Green Line along the On August 13, 2012, a Complete Streets ordinance (Proposal 208) was passed with a • The Multi-Modal Suburban Commuter Corridor, which is the same as the Multi-Modal HHPA Railroad right-of-way, and the Red Line (still under study). unanimous vote of the Indianapolis-Marion County City-County Council, and Mayor Ballard Urban Commuter Corridor but is in a suburban area rather than an urban area, which may Also, many roads will see enhanced bus service, and Illinois/ signed the proposal into law on August 23rd. The AARP, Health by Design, and many other affect its design. (see p. T.5c) Capitol, College, and Fall Creek will see express bus routes. organizations supported this ordinance, which has been recognized nationally by Smart Growth America as the best of 130 Complete Streets policies approved last year across the United • The Urban Connector Corridor, which provides connections to longer multi-modal Strategic investment focused on areas around rapid transit States. The Indianapolis Regional Center and Metropolitan Area Multi-Modal Corridor and corridors, typically has low traffic speed and volume, and usually has stops at each routes, anchor institutions, and Fall Creek can attract private Public Space Design Guidelines, released August 2008, offer many helpful recommendations intersection with on-street parking and pedestrian activity areas encouraged. (see p. T.6a) investment and build walkability. This will make DFC competitive for the development of Complete Streets in Destination Fall Creek, including: for other funding opportunities and help to enhance residential and • The Bicycle Boulevard Corridor, which is a non-thoroughfare roadway, often a local street commercial demand in throughout the DFC area. • The Urban Pedestrian Corridor, which occurs along streets with transit routes, high that has been modified to enhance bicycle travel continuity, bicyclist safety, and convenience incidences of mixed uses in linear clusters, and adjacent residential density and has transit, across multiple districts. This corridor facilitates bicycles circulation and commuting with TARGET CONCEPT CONSIDERATIONS bicycle lanes, wide sidewalks, and curbside parking as near equal priorities. (see p. T.2) periodic restrictions to through vehicular access. (see p. T.9) Each of the target areas included in this Vision Plan was selected in a process narrowing down from twelve original areas according • The Multi-Modal Urban Commuter Corridor, which is used for travel to and from employment • The City Beautiful Overlay on a Multi-Modal Parkway, which is associated with historic to the maps on the left, and each concept was designed to centers and accommodates a high volume of traffic efficiently with synchronized traffic landscapes, districts, monuments, and civic buildings representing the City Beautiful enhance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parks & Green Spaces Within the I-465 Ring
    Parks & Green Spaces within the I-465 ring Blickman Educational Trail Park (6399 N. Meridian St.) Broad Ripple Park (1500 Broad Ripple Ave.) 62 acres Fall Creek & 30th Park (2925 E Fall Creek Pkwy N Dr.) - borders the Fall Creek Parkway Trail Franklin Township Community Park (8801 E Edgewood Ave.) Glenns Valley Nature Park (8015 Bluffs Rd.) Holliday Park (6349 Springmill Rd.) 94 acres Juan Solomon Park (6100 Grandview Dr.) 41 acres Northwestway Park (5253 W 62nd St.) Paul Ruster Park (11300 E Prospect St.) 82 acres Raymond Park (8300 Raymond St.) 35 acres Skiles Test Nature Park (6828 Fall Creek Rd.) Town Run Trail Park South (5325 E 96th St.) 127 acres - bikers have right-of-way; hike with extreme caution Washington Park (3130 E 30th St.) 128 acres Lilly ARBOR (adjacent to IUPUI campus, located along the White River on Porto Alegre St. between 10th St. bridge and New York St. bridge; park in lot 63 and take stairs at New York St. down to the trail) Parks & Green Spaces outside the I-465 ring North (Boone & Hamilton Counties) Central Park (1235 Central Park Dr. E, Carmel) 159 acres Cheeney Creek Natural Area (11030 Fishers Pointe Blvd., Fishers) 25 acres Cool Creek Park (2000 E 151st St, Carmel) 90 acres Creekside Nature Park (11001 Sycamore St., Zionsville) 18 acres - parking limited; park across the street at Lions Park and take the trail under the bridge to Creekside Creekside Corporate Park (W 106th St., Zionsville) 24 acres - links to Creekside Nature Park via bridge across Eagle Creek along S main St./Zionsville Rd Hoosier Woods
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Impact of the Indianapolis Cultural Trail: a Legacy of Gene and Marilyn Glick
    Assessment of the Impact of the Indianapolis Cultural Trail: A Legacy of Gene and Marilyn Glick 334 N. Senate Avenue, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Assessment of the Impact of the Indianapolis Cultural Trail: A Legacy of Gene and Marilyn Glick March 2015 15-C02 Authors List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... iii Jessica Majors List of Maps ............................................................................................................................ iii Graduate Assistant List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... iv IU Public Policy Institute Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 1 Key findings ....................................................................................................................... 1 Sue Burow An eye on the future .......................................................................................................... 2 Senior Policy Analyst Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 IU Public Policy Institute Background ....................................................................................................................... 3 Measuring the Use of the Indianapolis Cultural Trail: A Legacy of Gene
    [Show full text]
  • The Indiana State Trails · Greenways & Bikeways Plan
    THE INDIANA STATE TRAILS · GREENWAYS & BIKEWAYS PLAN STATE OF INDIANA Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Governor State House, Second Floor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Dear Trail Enthusiasts: With great excitement, I welcome you to travel the path down our state’s latest comprehensive trails plan. Not since our state park system was created has the state undertaken an outdoor initiative of this potential scope. This initiative will soon begin uniting our state’s disconnected routes and place every Hoosier within 15 minutes of a trail. The whole will be much greater than the sum of its parts and will benefit Hoosiers from all walks of life. We doubled state funding from $10 million to $20 million annually to take advan- tage of this unique network of opportunities, and at first glance this is a recreation initiative, but we intend it to be much more. Our trails plan will encourage healthy habits in Hoosiers, boost tourism and enhance Indiana’s ability to attract new investment and jobs. Our trail investments can deliver. As Hoosiers enjoy our new trails, they will be hiking, walking, and rid- ing over miles of new high-speed telecommunications and utility conduits. Access to outdoor recreation also ranks among the features potential companies seek for their employees when locating a business. Real success will require the help of local communities, businesses, and private philanthropies. Let’s join together as we create something that will be the envy of the nation! Sincerely, Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. HOOSIERS ON THE MOVE THE
    [Show full text]
  • Reasons to Love the Indianapolis Cultural Trail
    Reasons to Love the Indianapolis Cultural Trail: A Legacy of Gene and Marilyn Glick The Indianapolis Cultural Trail: A Legacy of Gene and Marilyn The Indianapolis Cultural Trail is having a Glick (the Trail) is an eight-mile urban bike and pedestrian measurable economic impact. pathway that serves as a linear park in the core of downtown Property values within 500 feet (approximately one block) Indianapolis. Originally conceived by Brian Payne, Presi- of the Trail have increased 148% from 2008 to 2014, an dent and CEO of the Central Indiana Community Foundation increase of $1 billion in assessed property value. (CICF), to help create and spur development in the city’s cultural districts, the Trail provides a beautiful connection for residents and visitors to safely explore downtown. Com- many businesses along Massachusetts and Virginia Avenues.The Trail Businesshas increased surveys revenue reported and part-timecustomer andtraffic full-time for cultural districts and provides a connection to the seventh via jobs have been added due to the increases in revenue and pleted in 2012, the Trail connects the now six (originally five) - tural, heritage, sports, and entertainment venue in downtown Indianapolisthe Monon Trail. as well The as Trail vibrant connects downtown every significantneighborhoods. arts, cul customers in just the first year. It also serves as the downtown hub for the central Indiana expenditure for all users is $53, and for users from outside greenway system. theUsers Indianapolis are spending area while the averageon the Trail. exceeds The $100.average In all,expected Trail users contributed millions of dollars in local spending.
    [Show full text]
  • Get Theapp Mobile Map and Bikecheck out Customer Service @Pacersbikeshare | Pacersbikeshare.Org 0
    E 71ST ST. Marott Park Indianapolis Art Center Opti Park 66TH ST. RIVERVIEW DR. WESTFIELD BLVD. N MERIDIAN ST. 65TH ST. er 64TH ST. v White Ri WASHINGTON BLVD. CENTRAL AVE. Holliday Park White Rive Broad Ripple Park r BROAD RIPPLE AVE. WINTHROP AVE. WINTHROP GUILFORD AVE. GUILFORD COLLEGE AVE. BROAD RIPPLE AVE. RIVERVIEW DR. E 63RD ST. WESTFIELD BLVD. Monon Trail Monon Juan Solomon Park N MERIDIAN ST. E 61ST ST. E 61ST ST. Dan Wakefield Park INDYGO RED LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT KESSLER BLVD E DR. KESSLER BLVD E DR. KESSLER BLVD E DR. Friedman Park N MERIDIAN ST. MERIDIAN N WESTFIELD BLVD. The Riviera Club Monon Trail Monon Canterbury 56TH ST. Park WINTHROP AVE. GUILFORD AVE. COLLEGE AVE. CENTRAL AVE. MERIDIAN ST. ILLINOIS ST. N CAPITOL AVE. er White Riv 54TH ST. 54TH ST. Highland Golf Country Club WESTFIELD BLVD.54TH ST. Rocky Ripple 52ND ST. 52ND ST. 52ND ST. Holcomb Gardens E 49TH ST. 49TH ST E 49TH ST. Butler Arsenal Park University AVE. SUNSET Central Canal Trail E 46TH ST. E 46TH ST. MICHIGAN RD. COLLEGE AVE. CENTRAL AVE. MERIDIAN ST. COLD SPRING RD. N CAPITOL AVE. ILLINOIS ST. EVAANSTON AVE. HAMPTION DR. HAUGHEY AVE. HAUGHEY INDYGORED LINEBUS RAPID TRANSIT 43RD ST. 43RD ST. Andrew COLD SPRING RD. Ramsey Park E 42ND ST. E 42ND ST. Central Canal Trail Monon Trail MICHIGAN RD. 42ND ST. Tarkington Park Crown Hill Cemetary Fall Creek Trail Newfields 38TH ST. 38TH ST. INDYGO RED LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT 38TH ST. Watson Road Bird Preserve Woodstock Riverside Country Club Golf Academy Lake Sullivan Sports Complex & E FALL CREEK PKWY DR.
    [Show full text]
  • INDY GREENWAYS the Indy Greenways Patch Is a Local Patch Program That Teaches Central Indiana Girl Scouts About the Indy Greenways System
    INDY GREENWAYS The Indy Greenways patch is a local patch program that teaches central Indiana Girl Scouts about the Indy Greenways system. The intent of the program is to raise awareness and educate young kids on the design, function, and proper use of the Indy Greenways and to demonstrate the important role that the greenways play in connecting local communities. It is also intended to instill a level of ownership, responsibility, and stewardship for the greenway system. The patch program aims to achieve the following objectives: Raise awareness of the Indy Greenways system, what it is, and how it is used. Provide a basic understanding of Indy Greenways and how to use the trails. Provide a basic understand of how trails and greenways benefit communities. Instill a responsibility for the ongoing stewardship of the greenways system. Instill a general interest on how the greenways can be a part of Girl Scouts’ everyday lives. Getting Started This program has been developed to accommodate multiple age levels of girl scout troops, with specific focus on the following grade levels: • Girl Scout Daisies, Brownies and Juniors - grades K-5. • Girl Scout Cadettes- grades 6-8. Troop leaders should modify the program as needed to accommodate specific troop age and grade levels. Program Overview The program includes three basic elements that must be completed in order to achieve the Indy Greenways patch: Learn Indy Greenways (Educational Component) - a troop- facilitated educational session that introduces Indy Greenways, its purpose, and other important facts about the greenways and their use. The educational component includes research and discussion that can be led by volunteer troop leaders and can be completed within an one-hour working session (troop meeting).
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Benjamin Harrison: from Military Base to Indiana State
    FORT BENJAMIN HARRISON: FROM MILITARY BASE TO INDIANA STATE PARK Melanie Barbara Hankins Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History, Indiana University April 2020 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty of Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee ____________________________________ Philip V. Scarpino, Ph.D., Chair ____________________________________ Rebecca K. Shrum, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Anita Morgan, Ph.D. ii Acknowledgements During my second semester at IUPUI, I decided to escape the city for the day and explore the state park, Fort Benjamin Harrison State Park. I knew very little about the park’s history and that it was vaguely connected to the American military. I would visit Fort Harrison State Park many times the following summer, taking hikes with my dog Louie while contemplating the potential public history projects at Fort Harrison State Park. Despite a false start with a previous thesis topic, my hikes at Fort Harrison State Park inspired me to take a closer look at the park’s history, which eventually became this project. Finishing this thesis would have been nearly impossible without the encouragement and dedication of many people. First, I need to thank my committee: Dr. Philip Scarpino, Dr. Rebecca Shrum, and Dr. Anita Morgan for their criticism, support, and dedication throughout my writing process. I would especially like to thank my chair, Dr. Scarpino for his guidance through the transition of changing my thesis topic so late in the game.
    [Show full text]
  • Task 5: Connectivity
    Task Five: Connectivity In this task, the team developed an understanding for existing opportunities and gaps related to connectivity along the White River. The team evaluated efforts underway in both Hamilton and Marion Counties, and recommended potential areas for improvement. The following pages detail our understanding of the current conditions and plans for the river. Core Team DEPARTMENT OF METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT HAMILTON COUNTY TOURISM, INC. VISIT INDY RECONNECTING TO OUR WATERWAYS Project Team AGENCY LANDSCAPE + PLANNING APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC. CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING ENGAGING SOLUTIONS FINELINE GRAPHICS HERITAGE STRATEGIES HR&A ADVISORS, INC. LANDSTORY LAND COLLECTIVE PORCH LIGHT PROJECT PHOTO DOCS RATIO ARCHITECTS SHREWSBERRY TASK FIVE: CONNECTIVITY Table of Contents Adjacent Parcel Documentation 4 Existing Mobility Documentation 8 Connectivity Gaps & Opportunities 18 Cadence of Amenities 22 References and Endnotes 30 4 Adjacent Parcel Documentation Publicly Owned, Publicly Accessible: land owned by state, county, city or other Adjacent Parcel public organizations. Publicly owned and accessible land includes primary and secondary schools, city or state-owned Documentation higher education institutions, public parks, Central Indiana’s economic, social and plazas, open spaces and preserves. environmental health is interconnected and Publicly Owned, Limited to No Access: tied to the health of the White River. Flooding these lands include those that are publicly is not the only detractor from this fine owned but have limited public access like balance; yet, it is often one of the first issues public utilities or utility easements. considered and most directly apparent. Other significant issues include lost cropland, lack of Privately Owned, Publicly Accessible: aordable access to safe housing, poor access Private colleges and private parks that are to parkland and the river, and loss of native open to the public fall within this category.
    [Show full text]
  • Task 4/6 Report: Programming & Destinations
    Tasks Four/Six: Destinations and Programming In these tasks, the team developed an understanding for destinations, events, programming, and gathering places along the White River. The team evaluated existing and potential destinations in both Hamilton and Marion Counties, and recommended new catalyst sites and destinations along the River. The following pages detail our process and understanding of important destinations for enhanced or new protection, preservation, programming and activation for the river. Core Team DEPARTMENT OF METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT HAMILTON COUNTY TOURISM, INC. VISIT INDY RECONNECTING TO OUR WATERWAYS Project Team AGENCY LANDSCAPE + PLANNING APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC. CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING ENGAGING SOLUTIONS FINELINE GRAPHICS HERITAGE STRATEGIES HR&A ADVISORS, INC. LANDSTORY LAND COLLECTIVE PORCH LIGHT PROJECT PHOTO DOCS RATIO ARCHITECTS SHREWSBERRY TASK FOUR/SIX: DESTINATIONS AND PROGRAMMING Table of Contents Destinations 4 Programming 18 Strawtown Koteewi 22 Downtown Noblesville 26 Allisonville Stretch 30 Oliver’s Crossing 34 Broad Ripple Village 38 Downtown Indianapolis 42 Southwestway Park 46 Historic Review 50 4 Destinations Opportunities to invest in catalytic projects exist all along the 58-mile stretch of the White River. Working together with the client team and the public, the vision plan identified twenty-seven opportunity sites for preservation, activation, enhancements, or protection. The sites identified on the map at right include existing catalysts, places that exist but could be enhanced, and opportunities for future catalysts. All of these are places along the river where a variety of experiences can be created or expanded. This long list of destinations or opportunity sites is organized by the five discovery themes. Certain locations showed clear overlap among multiple themes and enabled the plan to filter through the long list to identify seven final sites to explore as plan ‘focus areas’ or ‘anchors’.
    [Show full text]
  • Indy Greenways IMPLEMENTATION.Indd
    White River Greenway chapter six IMPLEMENTATION chapter six IMPLEMENTATION inside this chapter: SYSTEM BUILD OUT RECOMMENDATIONS Methodology . 273 Part A: Impact Assessment . 273 Part B: Weighted Infl uences . 276 General Interpretation & Prioritization . .276 POLICY & ADMINISTRATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS A. Hours of Operation . 279 B. Seasonal Operations . 281 C. Greenway Oversight . 283 D. Maintenance Policies. 285 E. Media & Technology Platforms . 291 F. Partnerships, Sponsorships & Donors. .296 G. Regulatory Tools. .298 ACTION PLAN AGENDA Action Plan Matrices. 301 CHAPTERimplementation 6 he adoption of the 2014-24 Indy Greenways Full Circle Plan is the fi rst step in implementation. It is acknowledged that this is a long-term strategy, and as such this T chapter outlines key steps in the ongoing process. This section is divided into three parts: 1. System Build Out – This section provides an overview of the prioritization of the various segments’ ultimate build-out. It describes a methodology for how the various segments were divided into short, medium and long-term design, engineering and construction priorities. There is a recognition that circumstances may arise that would modify this prioritization (such as land availability or funding opportunities), but this should be used as a general guide in the ongoing growth of the greenway system. 2. Policy & Administrative Recommendations – This section outlines several plan recommen- dations not specifi cally related to design and construction activities. These include such items as administrative function, maintenance and coordination of city regulatory tools. 3. Action Plan – This section summarizes the overall plan recommendations and highlights the key implementing agencies, partners, funding sources, action type, timeline and supporting plan goals Implementation of any project as complex as the Indy Greenways requires involvement from dozens of public, private and other support organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Canal Towpath Extension • Pa-17-006B Csx Railroad Repurpose - 30Th Street - Burdsall Parkway
    CENTRAL CANAL TOWPATH EXTENSION • PA-17-006B CSX RAILROAD REPURPOSE - 30TH STREET - BURDSALL PARKWAY 29th St Central Canal r wy N D Pk ek re Interstate 65 C ll Burdsal a F W Fall Creek Meridian St Current Fall Creek Trail Phase 1 (PA-24-009) Phase 2 (PA-24-008) PROJECT DETAILS This repurposing of an abandoned CSX Railroad line from 30th Street to Burdsall Parkway will supplement the Central PROJECT NUMBER: PA-17-006B Canal Towpath extension, which will connect the Fall Creek PROJECT STATUS: In Construction Trail Phase I and the White River Trail at Indiana Avenue ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: and 10th Street projects. When complete, the Central January to July 2020 Canal Towpath will provide users with an aggregate trail, ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $800K concrete sidewalks, curbs and ADA ramps and will join the NEIGHBORHOODS: Riverside, QuestEnd, overall plan to connect downtown Indianapolis with Fort WestSide, Haughville, Benjamin Harrison State Park. FOR MORE INFORMATION [email protected] 317-327-2656 • indy.gov/DPW The Indianapolis Department of Public Works (DPW) continues to transform Indianapolis neighborhoods through the restoration of deteriorating thoroughfares, residential streets, sidewalks and bridges, as well as addressing neighborhood drainage and flooding issues. This investment continues to transform neighborhoods throughout Indianapolis. These projects create local jobs and increase public safety for neighborhoods and residents, which support DPW’s commitment to make Indianapolis a more livable city. K S C F HOMEOWNER RESPONSIBILITIES ow grass to 8 inches or less Keep ditches free of high grasses and debris Remoe trash and litter blocking Pick up after pets stormwater inlets Clear away any leaes from storm drains nly rain belongs in the storm drain aintain clean and clear culerts The stormwater system ends in our waterways ets keep it clean and draining uickly.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Indiana Audubon
    A GUIDE TO THE “Adventure awaits on the Indiana Birding Trail” From the shores of Lake Michigan to the banks of the Ohio River, and everything in between, Indiana’s INDIANA AUDUBON diverse habitats have supported the documentation of over 400 bird species. 33 22 3 4 21 54 41 63 20 34 23 27 52 5 45 INDIANA BIRDING TRAIL GUIDE 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS 10 Bendix Woods County Park ...................... 3 Miller Beach ........................................... 34 St. Joseph County - NW Porter County - NW 25 Northwest Beverly D. Crone Restoration Area ........... 4 Mississinewa Lake .................................. 35 44 St. Joseph County - NW Miami County - NE 24 Boot Lake Nature Preserve ....................... 5 Monroe Lake .......................................... 36 58 Elkhart County - NE Monroe & Brown County - SW 57 Northeast Brookville Lake ........................................ 6 Mounds State Park ................................. 37 26 18 Franklin County - C Madison County - C 62 15 Brown County State Park ......................... 7 Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge ........ 38 35 Brown County - SE Jackson & Jennings Counties - SE Red numbers on map: Cane Ridge WMA-Tern Bar Slough WDA ....... 8 O’Bannon Woods State Park ................... 39 Correspond to page 49 Gibson County - SW Harrison County - SE numbers in book Celery Bog Nature Area ............................ 9 Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge ........ 40 42 Tippecanoe County - C Pike & Gibson Counties - SW C: Central 28 Chain O’ Lakes State Park ...................... 10 Pigeon River Fish & Wildlife Area ...........41 Noble County - NE LaGrange & Steuben Counties - NE NW: Northwest Charlestown State Park ........................... 11 Pine Creek Gamebird Habitat Area ........ 42 SE: Southeast 47 Clark County - SE Benton County - C 9 Clifty Falls State Park .............................12 Pine Hills Nature Preserve ..................... 43 SW: Southwest Jefferson County - SE Montgomery County - C Cool Creek Park & Nature Center ............13 Pisgah Marsh Fish & Wildlife Area ........
    [Show full text]