*v '% •. i. ; • ■; V ,-/: fctV/'* ' \ ! '■■
TV* • i .
v - : r'/+ ■>
E '
■ N
A
c;: . ... K~
MICROFILMED 1991
T.->.
Si'■■ ' - i '
•'. V ‘ INFORMATION TO USERS
This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UM1 films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.
The quality of this reproduction Is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6N x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order.
University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600
Order Number 0130435
A descriptive study of verbal statements made by Saudi Arabian students about Islamic and Western art objects
Alamoud, Yousef Ibrahim, Ph.D.
The Ohio State Univenity, 1091
Copyright ©1001 by Alamoud, Youaef Ibrahim. All rlghta reserved.
UMI 300 N. Zeeb RA Ann Aibor, MI 48106
A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF VERBAL STATEMENTS MADE
BY SAUDI ARABIAN STUDENTS ABOUT ISLAMIC
AND WESTERN ART OBJECTS
DISSERTATION
Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate
School of The Ohio State University
By
Yousef I. Alamoud, B.A., M.A.
The Ohio State University 1991
Dissertation Committee: Approved by Nancy MacGregor Arthur Efland 1 Adviser Q Department of Art Education Ojo Areva, Sr. Copyrights by Yousef X. Alamoud 1991 [
To the memory of
my grandmother, my first art teacher.
ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
At the outset of these acknowledgements, I would like to thank God, who gave me the health, inspiration, and desire to achieve this humble manuscript. Sincere gratitude and appreciation are expressed to my academic advisor, Professor Nancy MacGregor, for her gracious endurance, encouragement, and insightful and critical contributions during all stages of the research's unfold ing development.
My thanks are also due here to Professor Arthur
Efland and Professor Ojo Arewa, Sr., not only for their instruction in curriculum, evaluation, history, and anthropology of art education, but also for sharing their incredible expertise and insights during coursework and as committee members.
Also, I wish to extend my extreme gratitude to
Professor Kenneth Marantz. His critical and insightful discussions are of high quality, and his love, tolerance, and support for Arab and international students is deeply treasured and appreciated.
Thanks is also extended to all30 student informants,
especially key informants, to the school principal and r
art teachers, and to all colleagues and friends at King Saud University and The Ohio State University. Their insights and encouragement are greatly appreciated.
I give my greatest appreciation to my mother for her patience and continuous sincere prayers. My wife deserves
a special thanks for her tolerance and moral support. Finally, my thanks to Mrs. Linda Caine for her
excellent job in typing this dissertation.
iv VITA
February 23, 1955 ...... Born - Unayzah, Saudi Arabia. 1976-1980 ««««*..«. B.A., Art Education, Kin? Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
1980 ...... Teacher Assistant at King Saud University, Department of Instructional Media and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
198 1 ...... Teacher Assistant at King Saud University, Department of Art Education, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
1 9 8 1 ...... Art Instructor at The Hobbies Centers, King Saud Univer sity, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
1983-1986 ...... M.A., Art Education, University of Wisconsin in Madison.
1986 Co-founder and first president of The Saudi Arabian Art Education Association, Columbus, Ohio.
FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Art Education
Studies in Curriculum, History, Evaluation, and Research Methodology by Professors Arthur Efland and Nancy MacGregor
Studies in Philosophy and Criticism by Professors Kenneth Marantz, E. Louis Lankford, and Terry Barrett
Studies in Anthropology and Communication by Professors Ojo Arewa, Sr., John Messenger, Barbara Boyer, and Ali Aljaberi
v TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEDICATION ...... ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...... ill
VITA ...... v
LIST OF T A B L E S ...... xi
LIST OF FIGURES...... xii
LIST OF P L A T E S ...... xiii
CHAPTER PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION ...... 1
Background of the Problem ...... 1 Statement of the Major Problem ...... 4 Other Related Problems...... 4 Limitations...... 5 Significance of the study ...... 5 Objective of the S t u d y ...... 6 The Data and Treatment of D a t a ...... 7 The Primary D a t a ...... 7 The Secondary D a t a ...... 7 Procedures ...... 8
II. THE STATUS OF ART EDUCATION IN SAUDI ARABIAN GENERAL EDUCATION ...... 14 Introduction ...... 14 The History of Art Education from 1963-1974 . . 16 The History of Art Education from 1975 to the P r e s e n t ...... 21 The Handling of Art Education by the General Directorate of School Activities . 24 Examples of Art Education Activities ...... 28 The Nature of Instruction and Teachers .... 30 The Nature of T e a c h e r s ...... 35 Art Educators and the Decision-Making Process . 37 vi CHAPTER PAGE
Anthropological Considerations in Art Education for the Past 25 Y e a r s ...... 39 The Suggested Curriculum Model for Art Educa tion in Saudi A r abia...... 49 Anthropological Justification of McFee's Model Perception-Delineation ...... 54
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES ...... 57
Introduction ...... 57 Selection of Social Situation ...... 58 Participant Observation Strategy ...... 61 Procedures for Data C o l l e c t i o n ...... 64 Ethnographic Equipment ...... 69 Pen and Notebook...... 69 C a m e r a ...... 70 Tape R e c o r d e r ...... 70 Population Studied ...... 71 Ethnographic Focus ...... 76
IV. THE APPRECIATION OF ART OBJECTS IN MUSEUMS AND REPRODUCTIONS ...... 77
Introduction ...... 77 The Appreciation of Art Objects in Museums . . 77 Bringing High-Quality Western Style Art Forms to the C l a s s r o o m ...... 77 Bringing Students to Places Where Quality Works from Either Culture Might be F o u n d ...... 84 The Appreciation of Art Objects in Reproduc tions ...... 89 Historical Background ...... 89 Technical Background ...... 94 Aesthetic Issues in Reproduction ...... 99 The Social Function of Reproduction .... 103 Reproductions as Related to the Researcher's Ethnographic Project ...... 107
V. THE OBJECTS OF ART FOR DISCUSSION...... Ill
Introduction ...... Ill Review of Islamic Art Objects...... 112 The Q u r a n ...... 117 Quran Manuscript ...... 117 Incense Burner ...... 118 Prayer R u g ...... 118 Arabic Calligraphy ...... 119
vii [
CHAPTER PAGE
Contemporary Saudi and Arab Artists ...... 120 Modern Composition of Arabia Calligraphy . . 121 Popular Houses ...... 121 Islamic Architecture ...... 122 Floral Arabesque and Geometric Ornament . . 122 Arabic Calligraphy ...... 123 Review of Western Art objects...... 132 The F i f e r ...... 136 Boats at the A r a e n t e u i l ...... 137 Wheat Field and Cypress T r e e s ...... 137 The Old K i n g ...... 138 Woman With a H a t ...... 139 Broadway Boogie-Woogie ...... 140 The Perslstence_of Memory ...... 141 M u r a l ...... 142 Green Coca-Cola Bottles ...... 143
VI. THE TOPICS OF ART FOR D I S C U S S I O N ...... 152 Planning Activities for Students to Talk about Art O b j e c t s ...... 152 Suggested Activity P l a n ...... 155 Questions and Topics for Discussion ...... 159 Question Topics ...... 160 Philosophical Category ...... 161 Structural Category ...... 162 Formative Category ...... 163 Historical Category ...... 163 Relational Category ...... 164 Psychological Category ...... 165 Ethnographic Questioning Strategies .... 165
VII. DATA ANALYSES AND FINDINGS ...... 175
Introduction ...... 175 The Cultural Factors in Student Discussion About Art O b j e c t s ...... 176 Social Factors ...... 178 Taking a Cooperative Position ...... 178 R e p e t i t i o n ...... 179 Plural Representation ...... 180 Exaggeration and Overassertion ...... 183 Educational Factors ...... 184 Literary versus Colloquial Arabic .... 185 Quote-supported Responses ...... 186 Weakness of Critical Response ...... 187 Shortage of Art Knowledge...... 188
viii
r ► IF
CHAPTER PAGE Detmers' Extended Content Categories ...... 189 Philosophical Content ...... 190 Responses to Islamic Art Objects .... 190 Responses to Western Art Objects .... 193 Islamic Influence on Philosophical Responses to Islamic Art Objects . . . 199 Islamic Influence on Philosophical Responses to Western Art Objects . . . 202 Structural Content ...... 205 Responses to Islamic Art Objects .... 206 Responses toWestern Art Objects .... 208 Islamic Influence on Structural Responses to Islamic Art objects . 211 Islamic Influence on Structural Responses to Western Art Objects...... 213 Formative Content ...... 214 Responses to Islamic Art Objects .... 215 Responses to Western Art objects .... 216 Islamic Influence on Formative Responses to Islamic Art Objects...... 218 Islamic Influence on Formative Responses to Western Art Objects...... 219 Historical Content ...... 220 Responses to Islamic Art Objects .... 220 Responses to Western Art Objects .... 223 Islamic Influence on Historical Responses to Islamic Art Objects...... 225 Islamic Influence on Historical Responses to Western Art Objects...... 227 Relational Content ...... 228 Responses to Islamic Art Objects .... 228 Responses to Western Art Objects .... 229 Islamic Influence on Relational Responses to Islamic Art Objects...... 230 Islamic Influence on Relational Responses to Western Art Objects ...... 231 Psychological Content ...... 232 Responses to Islamic Art objects .... 232 Responses to Western Art Objects .... 233 Islamic Influence on Psychological Responses to Islamic Art Objects . . . 234 Islamic Influence on Psychological Responses to Western Art Objects .. . 235
VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 238
Summary of the Research...... 238 Detmers* Content Categories ...... 239
ix CHAPTER PAGE
Cultural Factors Influencing Students' Discussions About A r t ...... 240 Islamic Art as Projected in Students' S t a t e m e n t s ...... 241 Western Art as Projected in Students' S t a t e m e n t s ...... 242 Arabic Language and Art Appreciation .... 243 Cultural Precaution and Art Appreciation . . 243 Recommendation for Further S t u d y ...... 244
APPENDICES
A. Developmental Research Sequence Writing Task . 246
B. A Taxonomy of Ethnographic Questions...... 250 C. A Sample of the Weekly Timetable for the Third Intermediate L e v e l...... 252 D. Letter of Introduction from The Ohio State University...... 254
E. Letter of Introduction from King Saud University...... 256 F. P l a t e s ...... 258 G. Description of Sample Data on Philosophical C o n t e n t ...... 278
H. Description of Sample Data on Structural C o n t e n t ...... 323
I. Description of Sample Data on Formative C o n t e n t ...... 337
J. Description of Sample Data on Historical C o n t e n t ...... 345
K. Description of Sample Data on Relational C o n t e n t ...... 359
L. Description of Sample Data on Psychological C o n t e n t ...... 363
LIST OF R E F E R E N C E S ...... 368
X
h r
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
1. A typical weekly timetable for the third intermediate level ...... 253
xi LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
1. Perception-delinoation III: A double feed back Interaction system 52 2. Physical arrangement in a group art discussion in a classroom setting ...... 75 3. The art-culture system d i a g r a m ...... 130 4. Analysis guide to the content of student responses to art o b j e c t s ...... 191
xii LIST OF PLATES
PLATE PAGE I Floral arabesque ...... 259
II Geometric Ornament...... 260 III Islamic Calligraphy Styles by Aftab Ahmad . . 261
IV Letters by Suliman Alhelwah ...... 262 V Prayer R u g ...... 263
VI Positions of Islamic Physical Prayer ...... 264 VII Popular Houses by Suliman B a j a b a ...... 265
VIII Islamic Architecture by Abdul-Rahman Alsuliman 266
IX Saudi Arabian Brass Coffee Pot ...... 267
X Incense Burner ...... 268
XI The Fifer by Edouard M a n e t ...... 269
XII Boats at the Aroenteuil by Claude Monet . . . 270
XIII Wheat Field and Cypress Tree by Vincent Van G o g h ...... 271
XIV The Old King by Georges R o u a u l t ...... 272
XV Woman with a Hat by Pablo P i c a s s o ...... 273
XVI Broadwav_Booqie-Woogie by Piet Mondrian . . . 274 XVII Persistence of Memory by Salvador Dali .... 275
XVIII Mural by Jackson Pollock...... 276
XIX Green Coca-Cola Bottles by Andy Warhol .... 277
xiii r
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Problem
This research attempted to focus on the study of knowledge and experience related to visual art as
reflected in oral statements given by students in the
final year of an intermediate school in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Student oral response to art objects was studied through field experience to facilitate the understanding of the context which leads and influences the discourse
process. Interest in the theme of student discussion
about art objects evolved from the sense that studying this discourse would be a practical means to describe art
education as it is taught in Saudi Arabian schools.
The description and analysis of the content and context of the 15-year-old students' art discussion may
bring attention to the type of quality of art education at
this stage of public schooling. Art education as a
regular curricular course is not taught after the inter mediate level. Art education was eliminated in 1974 from
the general curriculum of secondary schools. The
researcher was interested in studying students in the
1
r 2 final year of intermediate school to find out about what
they understand about art. These art outcomes are viewed
as satisfactory by most policymakers, as they feel no
additional experience in art education is necessary.
This research helps to identify how visual art is per
ceived, valued, and appreciated in the Saudi culture.
The term "culture" is used in this study to mean
the complex whole of knowledge, beliefs, and trends
consciously and unconsciously learned, shared, and
transmitted from one generation to another, and manifested
in the uniformity of words, acts, and artifacts of human groups. The term "Islamic culture" is used here as an
abstract description of knowledge, beliefs, and trends of
Islam toward uniformity in the words, acts, and artifacts
of Muslim groups. The terms "Saudi" or "Arabic" culture, wherever mentioned, are used interchangeably with Islamic culture.
Saudi Arabian art education is currently limited to studio art with little concern for cultural issues. Some scholars in the social sciences and other areas have emphasized the importance of social and cultural influ ences on the educational prgcess. Chalmers (1981), for
example, argues that the ethnologist provides a more
comprehensive role model for art education than other
models in the field, because "anthropology is primarily
oriented toward analyzing and understanding human behavior" (p. 6). He contends that the study of any type of art as it relates to people, such as the study of oral statements made by students as social participants who share one unique culture, "might be the key to understand ing the art that is meaningful in the lives of our students" (p. 9). In Preparation for Art. McFee (1961) devotes one chapter to the place of art in culture. Aesthetic appreciation or taste, according to McFee, develops from three sources: national culture, individual experience, and socioeconomic class. These factors are important in the study of culture. McFee recognizes that the cultural and social context influences the production and consump tion of the work of art.
Accordingly, the Saudi educational system has to base the study of art education on cultural foundations. In order to address the isolation of art from society, the
Saudi educational system should give more recognition to art education in the general curriculum of education. Once art education fulfills the needs of Saudi society, then Saudi policymakers would be able to change the negative image of value and importance of art education in
Saudi schools. The administration of art education is under the umbrella of the General Directorate of School
Activities in the Ministry of Education. Art education is categorized as an extracurricular activity, thus placing it as an extracurricular activity rather than an essential discipline. This placement reflects the position embraced
by the Ministry of Education toward art.
This research focused on how visual art, in the
context of art education, can be important in promoting
social and cultural values and in fulfilling the educational needs of Saudi society.
Statement of the Major Problem
This research identifies and analyzes cultural factors within the content of verbal statements given by Saudi Arabian students responding to Islamic and western artworks in the final year of an intermediate public school.
Other Related Problems
1) Identify cultural factors within the content of student discussion about artworks.
2) Identify and analyze the content of verbal statements given in response to Islamic artworks with reference to
Detmers' (1980) extended model for content in the
visual arts.
3) Identify and analyze the content of verbal statements
given in response to Western artworks with reference to
Detmers1 (1980) extended model for content in the
visual arts. 5
4) Identify and analyze Islamic cultural influences on
oral statements given in response to both Islamic and Western artworks.
Limitations
The study was limited to selected male students who were in the final year of a selected intermediate public school in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The approximate age of these students was 15 years.
Observations, interviews, audio taping, and visual records were gathered in one school. Several classrooms within this school setting were used for data gathering.
The researcher gathered and analyzed student oral responses. Other data were used for supportive purposes.
The study utilized visual materials to support the examination of verbal statements.
Significance of the study
Research on student discourse about art in Saudi intermediate school is important because of the role discussion plays in learning processes. As this study unfolds, art educators will be able to understand students' points of view about art. Furthermore, the ethnography of oral response about art should assist art teachers in making changes and stressing other aspects in art education, such as religious, historical, critical, and aesthetic. Fortunately, teachers of art education in
Saudi Arabian schools are art specialists, trained and graduated from art education institutions. Their conception of their profession, however, is limited to the making of art. Emphasis on studio in art education should be accompanied with teaching a thorough background about art. Art educators and art teachers who read this research will find verbal statements about art as vehicles in which accumulated knowledge, attitudes, and experi ences, shaped by Saudi culture, are transmitted.
Identification and analysis of student discussion could bring to the attention of everyone involved in the existing art education system the opportunities within art appreciation. It also could serve to influence policy and curriculum developers toward art programs which take into consideration the distinct culture of Saudi school populations.
Objective of the Study
The main objective of the study is to answer the
following questions: 1) What are the cultural factors within the content of
student discussions about art objects?
2} What is the content of verbal statements given in
response to Islamic art objects? 7
3) What is the content of verbal statements given in response to Western art objects?
4) What is the influence of Islamic culture on student
responses to both Islamic and Western art objects?
The Data and Treatment of Data
This descriptive study with ethnographic emphasis dealt with two types of data: primary data and secondary data. Each type of data is briefly described below.
The Primary Data:
1) Classroom observation: Notes on classroom settings and participating students, tape-recorded student
discussion about the art objects, preobservation and
postobservation notes.
2) student interview: Tape-recorded semistructured interview with 30 selected students, preinterview and
postinterview notes.
3) visual record: High-quality color reproductions of
selected Islamic and Western art objects, photographs
of classrooms and school environment.
The Secondary data:
1) Data on art education programs in intermediate schools.
2) Data on the concept of visual arts in Saudi society. 8 3) Published studies, texts, and unpublished disserta tions/theses dealing with the cultural foundations of
discussing art.
Procedures This research explains a cultural phenomenon in a specific geographical location, in a specific intermediate school in the city of Riyadh. Riyadh is the capital of
Saudi Arabia, the largest and most important industrial,
commercial, educational and cultural city in the Kingdom, located in the middle of the country.
Oral responses about artwork which occur in the
school setting are considered an important cultural
process. Although emphasis of art education in intermedi ate school curriculum is on the making of art, students in
the final year are able to express themselves verbally when asked about works of art. However, discussion of art in art education courses is not emphasized. In this
study, the students viewed some Islamic and Western
artworks and engaged in group and individual discussions.
In this social situation, the researcher, as a teacher, utilized the participant observation strategy as developed
in Spradley's (1980) method of Developmental Research
Sequence (D.R.S.) (see Appendix A). The role of the researcher as a teacher was very significant, because it