DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Government Boundary Commission for England

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Government Boundary Commission for England LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF WEST YORKSHIRE THE CITY OF WAKEFIELD Boundaries with:- LEEDS KIRKLEES BARNSLEY DONCASTER SELBY (North Yorkshire) SELBY KIRKLEES WAKEFIELD DONCASTER REPORT NO.600 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 600 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton MEMBERS Mr K F J Ennals Mr G Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr C W Smith Professor K Young Wakefield.BC THE RT HON MICHAEL HESELTINE MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF METROPOLITAN COUNTIES AND DISTRICTS THE CITY OF WAKEFIELD AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH LEEDS, KIRKLEES, BARNSLEY, DONCASTER AND SELBY COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1 . On 1 September 1987 we wrote to Wakefield City Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of Wakefield as part of our review of the Metropolitan County of West Yorkshire and its Districts under section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to the adjoining Metropolitan Authorities; the County and District Councils bordering West Yorkshire; to parish councils in Wakefield and the adjoining districts; to the Local Authority Associations; Members of Parliament with constituency interests; and the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities and statutory undertakers which might have an interest, as well as to British Telecom, the English Tourist Board, the local government press, and the local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The Metropolitan Authorities were requested, in co-operation as necessary with the other principal authorities, to assist us in publishing the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned. The authorities were also asked to ensure that the consultation letter was drawn to the attention of those involved with services such as the police and administration of justice. 3. A period of seven months from the date of the letter was allowed for all local authorities and any person or body interested in the review to send us their views on whether changes to Wakefield's boundary were desirable - and, if so, what those changes should be and how they would serve the interests of effective and convenient local government, the criterion laid down in the Act. THE SUBMISSIONS MADE TO US 4. In response to our letter, Wakefield City Council indicated that it did not wish to suggest any changes to its existing boundaries. However we received representations from the City of Leeds, the Metropolitan Boroughs of Kirklees, Barnsley, and.Doncaster and the District of Selby. We also received representations from South Kirkby and Moorthorpe Town Council and South Elmsall Town Council. 5. The representations made to us have suggested only minor changes to Wakefield's boundaries and we ourselves consider that, taken as a whole, the existing area of the City is apt for securing effective and convenient local government. We have decided therefore to propose no major change to Wakefield's boundaries; our proposals for minor changes are set out below. SUGGESTIONS FOR CHANGE AND OUR INITIAL CONCLUSIONS THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN WAKEFIELD AND LEEDS Draft Proposals (a) Castleford 6. Leeds had suggested a minor adjustment to its present boundary with Wakefield, so as to unite in Wakefield a chemical works, parts of which are situated on both banks of the River Aire. 7. We noted that the existing boundary divides the chemical works and decided to adopt Leeds' suggestion as our draft proposal, subject to a modification to replace a stretch of defaced boundary, to unite the works in Wakefield. (b) Fairies Hill 8. Leeds had suggested a minor adjustment to its present boundary with Wakefield so as to follow the mid-course of the River Calder. 9. We considered that the suggested realignment would provide a well-defined boundary. We therefore decided to adopt Leeds' suggestion as our draft proposal. (c) Area between the River Calder and the M1 near Lofthouse 10. Leeds had suggested amending its boundary with Wakefield in the vicinity of Fenton Road, Lingwell Gate Lane and Newmarket Silkstone, to remove anomalies. 11. We considered that, while the proposed amendments would each go some way to rectifying the existing anomalies, they would when taken in combination result in an even more unsatisfactory boundary. We concluded that the M1 and M62 would provide a better and more clearly defined boundary in this area between Kirkhamgate and the River Calder and therefore decided to issue a draft proposal to that effect. THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN WAKEFIELD AND KIRKLEES Draft Proposals (a) Pildacre Mills 12. Kirklees had suggested realigning its boundary with Wakefield in order to unite an industrial complex, known as Pildacre Mills, in Wakefield. 13. We felt that it would be in the interests of effective and convenient local government to unite the complex in one authority and decided to adopt Kirklees1 suggestion as our draft proposal. (b) Pildacre Lane 14. Kirklees had suggested amending its boundary with Wakefield so as to unite dwellings and gardens, which form part of a Kirklees- owned residential estate, together with a length of Pildacre Lane which provides access to it, in Kirklees. 15. We considered that it would be in the interests of effective and convenient local government both to unite these properties and gardens in one authority and to transfer that stretch of Pildacre Lane which provides access to the estate. We therefore decided to adopt Kirklees' suggestion as our draft proposal. (c) Mitchell Laithes Hospital 16. Kirklees had suggested realigning the boundary with Wakefield so as to unite the now redundant Mitchell Laithes Hospital in its area. 17. As the existing boundary splits the site of the hospital, the larger proportion of which lies in Kirklees, we decided to adopt Kirklees1 suggestion as our draft proposal. (d) Mitchell Laithes Sewage Works 18. Kirklees had suggested the realignment of its boundary with Wakefield along the River Calder to form a more identifiable boundary, uniting the Mitchell Laithes Sewage Works complex in Wakefield. 19. We noted that the present boundary follows an arbitrary route through the sewage works, crossing sludge beds and dividing the sewage works between two authorities. We therefore decided to adopt Kirklees1 suggestion that the works be united in Wakefield as our draft proposal. (e) Healey Mills Marshalling Yard 20. Kirklees had suggested that its present boundary with Wakefield be realigned to follow the centre of the course of the River Calder, placing the whole of the British Rail marshalling yard in Wakefield. 21 . The River Calder appears to have been diverted from its original course over the passage of time and, as a result, the present boundary now follows an arbitrary line curving through the marshalling yard. We felt that it would be sensible and in the interests of effective and convenient local government to unite the area in Wakefield. We therefore decided to adopt Kirklees' suggestion as our draft proposal. (f) Disused Railway 22. Kirklees had suggested realigning its boundary with Wakefield along the line of a disused railway, located to the north west of the B6117 Hostingley Lane, to a point where an agricultural access road passed over it at Hostingley Farm. 23. We noted that the main aim of the proposal was to establish a more identifiable boundary. However, it would further narrow an existing Kirklees salient into Wakefield. We concluded that it would be more beneficial in terms of effective and convenient local government to place the salient in Wakefield by realigning the boundary along a track to the west of Hostingley Farm and then north east along the Calder and Hebble Navigation to the existing boundary. We accordingly decided to issue a draft proposal to that effect. Interim decisions to make no proposals (g) Chancery Road 24. Kirklees had commented that the construction of a new length of road had resulted in its present boundary with Wakefield at Chancery Road being detrimental to effective highway maintenance. The Borough had therefore suggested a realignment which would rationalise highway maintenance in the area, by transferring a short stretch of Chancery Road to Kirklees. 25. We considered Kirklees1 suggestion but were not convinced that there were sufficient grounds for its adoption in terms of improving effective and convenient local government. We therefore took an interim decision to make no proposal. (h) Hardcastle Lane 26. Kirklees had suggested realigning its boundary with Wakefield near the Grange Lane and Hardcastle Lane areas in order to establish a logical break point for highway maintenance. However, Wakefield had opposed the suggestion on the grounds that it would involve the transfer of a block of properties which, it was claimed, had more affinity with Wakefield, than with Kirklees. 27. We considered that it was not in the interest of effective and convenient local government to transfer a block of properties to Kirklees whose residents might have more affinity with Wakefield, solely to facilitate highway maintenance. We therefore took an interim decision to make no proposal. THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN WAKEFIELD AND BARNSLEY Draft Proposals (a) River Dearne, Haigh 28. Barnsley had suggested realigning its present boundary with Wakefield to conform with the altered course of the River Dearne. 29. We agreed that a realignment of the boundary along the River Dearne would tie the boundary to a clear physical feature. We therefore decided to adopt Barnsley's suggestion as our draft proposal. (b) Woolley Colliery and Windhill Lane 30. Barnsley had suggested realigning its boundary with Wakefield in the vicinity of Woolley Colliery and associated washery. It proposed that an area incorporating the Colliery, properties in Bluebell Road and the Windhill Estate, Woolley Rabbit Warren and the rear of properties on Warren Lane, should be transferred to Barnsley.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Position Statement Between the City of York and Selby District Council in Relation to the Housing Market Area, April 2020
    Joint Position Statement between the City of York and Selby District Council in relation to the Housing Market Area, April 2020 Introduction 1. This statement seeks to clarify the position agreed between the City of York Council and Selby District Council through the Duty to Co-operate in relation to the Housing Market Area. Specifically, the statement seeks to: provide further clarification that any links between York and Selby only extend to part of the Selby area and that this is considered to support the approach taken by the Councils through the Duty to Co-operate to meet their own objectively assessed housing needs within their own administrative areas; and to clarify that both Council’s continue to maintain the position reached through the Duty to Co-operate that through the preparation of the York Local Plan and its submission and more recently with the review of the Selby Local Plan that it is not practical to seek to align the preparation of the two Plans and to consider housing needs jointly across the HMA. Preparation of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) 2. The 2004 Act refers to a Local Planning Authority’s (LPA) ‘area’ and it is clear that the statutory duty for an LPA is and must be in relation to their area. Thus the primary duty of the LPA is to assess the needs of their local authority area. 3. Paragraph 47 of the NPPF (2012) requires Local Plans to meet the full objectively assessed need in the Housing Market Area (HMA). Paragraph 159 of the NPPF helps clarify this, in that it requires LPAs to have a clear understanding of housing needs ‘in their area’.
    [Show full text]
  • Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract, West Yorkshire
    Determination Case reference: VAR2109 Admission authority: Wakefield Metropolitan District Council for Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract, West Yorkshire Date of decision: 31 March 2021 Determination In accordance with section 88E of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, I approve the proposed variation to the admission arrangements determined by Wakefield Metropolitan District Council for Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract for September 2021. I determine that for September 2021 the Published Admission Number shall be reduced from 45 to 30. The referral 1. Wakefield Metropolitan District Council (the local authority) has referred a proposal for a variation to the admission arrangements for September 2021 for Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract (the school), to the Office of the Schools Adjudicator. The school is a community school for children aged three to eleven in Pontefract. 2. The proposed variation is that the published admission number (PAN) for the school be reduced from 45 to 30 for September 2021. Jurisdiction 3. The referral was made to me in accordance with section 88E of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (the Act) which states that: “where an admission authority (a) have in accordance with section 88C determined the admission arrangements which are to apply for a particular school year, but (b) at any time before the end of that year consider that the arrangements should be varied in view of a major change in circumstances occurring since they were so determined, the authority must [except in a case where the authority’s proposed variations fall within any description of variations prescribed for the purposes of this section] (a) refer their proposed variations to the adjudicator, and (b) notify the appropriate bodies of the proposed variations”.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Statement
    PLANNING STATEMENT WHIN VIEW COURT MADELEY ROAD, HAVERCROFT, WAKEFIELD, WEST YORKSHIRE, WF4 2JE FULL PLANNING APPLICATION FOR THE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES, AND DEVELOPMENT OF 19 AFFORDABLE BUNGALOWS, LANDSCAPED COMMUNITY AMENITY SPACE AND COMMUNITY BUILDING PLANNING PORTAL REFERENCE: PP-09227852 Statement of Mr J Everett BSC Hons MRTPI Director, Addison Planning Consultants Ltd on behalf of Wakefield and District Housing 2nd December 2020 CONTENTS 1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE .......................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................ 4 3. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING HISTORY ........................................ 6 4. PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT....................................................................... 9 5. ASSESSMENT OF PLANNING CASE ........................................................... 13 6. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................... 21 REFERENCE SOURCES JAY EVERETT N/A WHIN VIEW COURT MADELEY ROAD, HAVERCROFT, WAKEFIELD | PLANNING STATEMENT QUALIFICATIONQUALIFICATIONSS ANDAND EXPERIENCEEXPERIENCE 1.1 My name is Jay Everett and I have been a Chartered Member of the Royal Town Planning Institute since 1993. I hold a degree in Town and Regional Planning, and I am Managing Director of Addison Planning Consultants Ltd. 1.2 I have 29 years of experience of working in the field of town planning, including 12 years in local government working in both planning policy and development control and 17 years acting for landowners, developers, occupiers, and investors throughout the North of England. My involvement in the property market involves the preparation of complex planning applications, strategic promotion of land and property through the local planning policy system; and acting as an expert witness in planning appeals. 1.3 This Planning Statement deals with the planning policy context relating to the site. I then consider the planning case for the proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Commissioners for England Land South of Darton Lane, Darton, Staincross Phase I Geo-Environmental Desk Study
    CHURCH COMMISSIONERS FOR ENGLAND LAND SOUTH OF DARTON LANE, DARTON, STAINCROSS PHASE I GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL DESK STUDY AUGUST 2019 Wardell Armstrong Unit 5, Newton Business Centre, Newton Chambers Road, Thorncliffe Park, Chapeltown, Sheffield, S35 2PH, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)114 245 6244 www.wardell-armstrong.com DATE ISSUED: August 2019 JOB NUMBER: SH12190 REPORT NUMBER: RPT-0001 CHURCH COMMISSIONERS FOR ENGLAND LAND SOUTH OF DARTON LANE, DARTON, STAINCROSS PHASE I GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL DESK STUDY PREPARED BY: Ryan O’Neill Graduate Engineering Geologist MSc REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Joanne Shaw Technical Director CGeol DOCUMENT RECORD Issue No. Date Details 1 23rd November 2018 Draft issue 2 6th February 2019 Final issue 3 12th August 2019 Revision A This report has been prepared by Wardell Armstrong LLP with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the Contract with the Client. The report is confidential to the Client and Wardell Armstrong LLP accepts no responsibility of whatever nature to third parties to whom this report may be made known. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of Wardell Armstrong LLP. ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong LLP, Registered in England No. OC307138. LAND AND PROPERTY Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING MINERAL ESTATES UK Offices: Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Bolton, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh, Glasgow, London, Manchester, Newcastle upon Tyne, Sheffield, and Truro. International Offices: Almaty and Moscow.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Staff Fit and Well
    Keeping staff fit and well Hand in hand against photograpy competition infection page 3 results page 16 Assisted Conception Unit celebrates 10 year anniversary with families page 4-5 Autumn / Winter 2011 Contents Chesterman 3 awarded for 8&9 superb care Well done to Chesterman 3 who have been nominated for the Sheffield’s Best Carer Award at the Sheffield’s Night of Honour awards ceremony. The ward was nominated by a patient for the excellent care they provide. Nurse Jean Maloney scoops national award Jean has been presented with an award for her work in supporting heart patients. She was presented with the award for ‘Outstanding 4 14&15 contribution to Arrhythmia Management’ by the charity Arrhythmia Congratulations Alliance at the 2011 Heart Rhythm Congress in Birmingham. Jean said: “Whilst this award was presented to me individually, I could not have achieved my aspirations without the help and support of everyone working within cardiology.” 16 19 4-5 Assisted Conception Unit celebrates 10 16-17 Professor awarded medal for research year anniversary with families into coeliac disease 6 Young People Get PASH-ionate 18 Snapshot – Photography Competition About Sexual Health 19 Right place, right time for Diabetes care 7 Year of Radiotherapy 8 - 9 One step at a time in a bid to keep fit 20 Getting to Know You Philip Wainwright, and healthy Research Communications Officer 10 Special service for those touched by 21 Karen Drake inspires spinal injuries Organ donation patients with visit 11 School helps promote hand hygiene 22 Cystic Fibrosis Unit given 12 Staff survey generous donation 13 STH researchers help move step closer to HIV vaccine 23 Link Lifestyle 14-15 Shaping our future 32 Out of the frying pan..
    [Show full text]
  • Kirklees Joint Agency Protocol for Domestic Violence and Abuse - School Notifications
    Kirklees Joint Agency Protocol for Domestic Violence and Abuse - School Notifications Front Door Safeguarding Hub – Protocol for a Domestic Violence and abuse notification for schools. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Aims and proposed process 3. Legal Requirements 4. Responsibilities 5. Schools` Responsibilities 6. Cross Border considerations Appendices Appendix 1 Early notification for Schools Process Map Appendix 2 Officer Training: Preparing for the notification checklist Appendix 3 Domestic Violence Designated Officer Leadership Responsibilities Appendix 4 Silent and Overt Approaches Appendix 5 Letter to Parents Appendix 6 School Template Appendix 7 Signatories to the Join Agency Domestic Violence School Notification Appendix 1 - Early notification process for schools for DV incidents This process intends to provide early information to schools where their pupils have been present/ witnessed an incident of Domestic violence, where police attended. It does not replace existing child protection/ safeguarding arrangements. Schools will still receive safeguarding notifications through existing routes and arrangements Police Officer attends domestic violence incident. Details of all children who reside at the address, D.O.B obtained Was the child present/ witness at the incident? Details Recorded on incident log/ DASH assessment. Police provide daily download to Front Door Duty & Advice of incidents Front Door Duty & Advice Information checks/ Educational setting identified Education staff telephone contact made with Designated Officer (Safeguarding Lead) at relevant school within 24 hours Mon-Fri. Weekend by Monday. Excel/SharePoint record maintained by Front Door Duty & Advice. Detailing incident number, school, safeguarding lead to who disseminated and date. Designated safeguarding officer to record information received in school Child protection file School to determine/ deliver appropriate level of support Link with Safer Schools Officer, where available/ appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • South Kirkby & Moorthorpe Town Council Newsletter
    Autumn/Winter Edition 2015 South Kirkby & Moorthorpe Town Council Newsletter at the Theatre Royal, Win 2 tickets to the Dick Wakefield on 2 January 2016. Whittington pantomime See Page 6 for full details WELCOME to this edition of the Community Voice brought to you by South Kirkby and Moorthorpe Town Council. Delivery of the Newsletter has been funded by advertising and all future editions will be paid for by sponsorship and advertising. With cuts to local services from central government we will aim to provide the One Stop Shop residents of South Kirkby and Moorthorpe with a range of services that otherwise we are starting will be the provision of free Moorthorpe would not be available to you. For instance wifi at Moorthorpe Railway Station - if it our One Stop Shop is now up and running is a success we will roll it out across the Railway Station at Moorthorpe Station, where people can community. The Town Council are proud to obtain free advice on a range of issues. We hope you enjoy this newsletter. Please announce the launch of the free We are organising events at the Grove Hall feel free to contact us about anything either by calling 01977 642159 or by e mail advice services at Moorthorpe Railway and our first one A Christmas Concert was at . Station making the station a “one stop fully booked within 3 days. Residents will be [email protected] Alternatively come and see us you are more shop” for general wellbeing advice and kept informed about forthcoming events. Meanwhile we have adapted an old than welcome..
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Health Needs Assessment for Wakefield
    Oral Health Needs Assessment Wakefield District Ian Walker Public Health Specialty Registrar March 2015 1 1.0 Executive summary Over the last thirty years there have been significant improvements in oral health in the UK, however many people still suffer the pain and discomfort of oral diseases which are largely preventable and remain a major public health problem. Decaying teeth constitutes the number one, most prevalent disease globally, with tooth decay (dental caries) and gum disease (periodontal disease) being the most common dental problems in the UK. There is a cumulative effect if unchecked in early stages of life, which leads to more pervasive decay in adulthood and higher chances of extensive tooth loss in later life. The distribution and severity of oral diseases varies between and within countries and regions and whilst sections of the British population enjoy very good levels of oral health, stark inequalities exist with some of the poorest and most disadvantaged sections of society facing significant oral health problems. This oral health needs assessment (OHNA) provides a detailed picture of the oral health needs of the Wakefield district and the commissioned dental services and oral health promotion services to meet those needs. It identifies gaps in provision and identifies key issues to be prioritised and addressed within future work on oral health in the district. Oral health of children 5 year olds in Wakefield are now 1½ times more likely to have some dental decay than 5 year olds across England. For an average group of 100 Wakefield children aged 5, there would be 41 with some dental decay, compared with 28 from an average group of 100 children from England.
    [Show full text]
  • 81 82 Valid From: 29 August 2021
    Bus service(s) 81 82 Valid from: 29 August 2021 Areas served Places on the route Doncaster Doncaster Frenchgate Wheatley Interchange Intake Doncaster Royal Infirmary Armthorpe (West Moor Park) What’s changed Timetable changes. Daytime on Mondays to Fridays buses will run every 15 minutes. Operator(s) How can I get more information? TravelSouthYorkshire @TSYalerts 01709 51 51 51 Bus route map for services 81 and 82 01/04/2016# Edenthorpe Arksey Wheatley Park Ind Est Armthorpe, Armthorpe, Briar Rd/Elm Rd Church St/ Mill St Bentley 81Ô, 82 Ñ Armthorpe, Doncaster Rd/Charles Cres Wheatley Hills Armthorpe, 81 Yorkshire Way/ Lincolnshire Way Armthorpe 82 Wheatley 81 Armthorpe, Church St/Winholme Wheatley, Armthorpe Rd/ Intake, Armthorpe Rd/ Doncaster Royal Infirmary Danum Sch 81Ó, 82 Ò Intake, Armthorpe Rd/Oakhill Rd 81Ò, 82Ó Doncaster, Frenchgate Interchange Wheatley, Thorne Rd/ Intake Doncaster Royal Infirmary Armthorpe, Parkway/Nutwell Ln Doncaster, Thorne Rd/ Christ Church Rd Town Moor 81 82 Bennetthorpe database right 2016 and yright p o c Cantley own r C Hyde Park Belle Vue data © y e v Sur e c dnan r O Bessacarr ontains C 6 = Terminus point = Public transport = Shopping area = Bus route & stops = Rail line & station = Tram route & stop Stopping points for service 81 Doncaster, Frenchgate Interchange Cleveland Street Hall Gate Thorne Road Town Moor Wheatley Armthorpe Road Intake Armthorpe Road Armthorpe Doncaster Road Church Street Mill Street Hatfi eld Lane Mercel Avenue Durham Lane Yorkshire Way Wickett Hern Road Nutwell
    [Show full text]
  • 1840 Barnsley - Staincross - Barnsley 1900 Barnsley - Staincross - New Lodge
    Service 1: 1840 Barnsley - Staincross - Barnsley 1900 Barnsley - Staincross - New Lodge Service 6: 1845 Barnsley - Kendray - Barnsley Service 8: 1811 Rotherham - Upper Haugh - Rotherham Service 8a: 1841 Rotherham - Upper Haugh - Rotherham Service 9: 1830 Rotherham - Sandhill - Rotherham 1910 Rotherham - Sandhill - Rawmarsh Service 11: 1830 Barnsley - Athersley North - Barnsley Service 12: 1835 Barnsley - Athersley South - Barnsley 1905 Barnsley - Athersley South -Carlton Rd Bottom Service 21a: 1810 Barnsley - Millhouse Green 1806 Millhouse Green - Barnsley Service 22x: 1820 Rotherham - Barnsley 1835 Barnsley - Rotherham Service 27: 1843 Barnsley - Wombwell 1830 Wombwell - Barnsley Service 27a: 1823 Barnsley - Grimethorpe 1900 Grimethorpe - Barnsley Service 28: 1705 Barnsley - Pontefract Service 28c: 1835 Pontefract - Barnsley 1803 Barnsley - Hemsworth Service 43: 1910 Barnsley - Pogmoor - Barnsley Service 44: 1839 Barnsley - Kingstone - Barnsley Service 57: 1840 Barnsley - Royston,Meadstead Drive 1820 Royston,Meadstead Drive - Barnsley Service 59: 1715 Barnsley - Wakefield 1820 Wakefield - Barnsley Service 66: 1835 Barnsley - Hoyland - Elsecar - Barnsley Service 67: 1810 Barnsley - Jump - Wombwell 1830 Wombwell - Jump - Barnsley Service 67a: 1707 Barnsley - Pilley - Wombwell 1720 Wombwell - Pilley - Barnsley Service 67c: 1637 Barnsley - Tankersley - Wombwell 1650 Wombwell - Tankersley - Barnsley Service 93: 1815 Barnsley - Woolley Grange 1842 Woolley Grange - Barnsley Service 94a: 1900 Barnsley - Cawthorne 1825 Cawthorne - Barnsley Service
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire Housing Allocation Policy
    Meeting: SCRUTINY COMMITTEE Date: 22 NOVEMBER 2011 Time: 5.00PM Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM To: Councillors I Chilvers, M Dyson, K Ellis, M Hobson, D Mackay, Mrs W Nichols (Chair), C Pearson, D Peart, R Price (Vice Chair) Agenda 1. Apologies for absence 2. Disclosures of Interest Members of the Scrutiny Committee should disclose personal or prejudicial interest(s) in any item on this agenda. 3. Minutes To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the Scrutiny Committee held on 25 October 2011 (pages 3 to 11 attached). 4. Call In Items 5. Chair’s Address to the Scrutiny Committee 6. Crime and Disorder – Safer Neighbourhood Team Priorities North Yorkshire Police Report submitted for information only (page 12 to 13 attached). 7. North Yorkshire Home Choice – Allocations Choice Based Lettings Policy Report of the Policy Officer (page 14 to 57 attached). Julia Jennison and Vanessa Crane in attendance. 8. 2nd Quarter Corporate Plan Report Report of the Business Manager (page 58 to 72 attached). Eve Williams in attendance. Scrutiny Committee 22 November 2011 1 9. Access Selby Service Provision – Leisure Provision (WLCT) Report of the Senior Contracts Officer (pages 73 to 75 attached). Mike Lyons, WLCT - Head of Service (Sport and Leisure) and Aimi Brookes in attendance. 10. Access Selby Service Provision – Customer Contact Centre Report of the Lead Officer – Community Support Teams (pages 76 to 78 attached). Simon Parkinson in attendance. 11. Scrutiny Committee Work Programme The Committee are presented with the
    [Show full text]
  • May 2021 FOI 2387-21 Drink Spiking
    Our ref: 2387/21 Figures for incidents of drink spiking in your region over the last 5 years (year by year) I would appreciate it if the figures can be broken down to the nearest city/town. Can you also tell me the number of prosecutions there have been for the above offences and how many of those resulted in a conviction? Please see the attached document. West Yorkshire Police receive reports of crimes that have occurred following a victim having their drink spiked, crimes such as rape, sexual assault, violence with or without injury and theft. West Yorkshire Police take all offences seriously and will ensure that all reports are investigated. Specifically for victims of rape and serious sexual offences, depending on when the offence occurred, they would be offered an examination at our Sexual Assault Referral Centre, where forensic samples, including a blood sample for toxicology can be taken, with the victim’s consent, if within the timeframes and guidance from the Faculty for Forensic and Legal Medicine. West Yorkshire Police work with support agencies to ensure that all victims of crime are offered support through the criminal justice process, including specialist support such as from Independent Sexual Violence Advisors. Recorded crime relating to spiked drinks, 01/01/2016 to 31/12/2020 Notes Data represents the number of crimes recorded during the period which: - were not subsequently cancelled - contain the search term %DR_NK%SPIK% or %SPIK%DR_NK% within the crime notes, crime summary and/or MO - specifically related to a drug/poison/other noxious substance having been placed in a drink No restrictions were placed on the type of drink, the type of drug/poison or the motivation behind the act (i.e.
    [Show full text]