To Bring the Good News to All Nations: Evangelicals, Human Rights, and U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

To Bring the Good News to All Nations: Evangelicals, Human Rights, and U.S To Bring the Good News to All Nations: Evangelicals, Human Rights, and U.S. Foreign Policy, 1969-1994 Lauren Frances Turek Woodbury, CT Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Master of Arts, New York University, 2007 Bachelor of Arts, Vassar College, 2005 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August 2015 © Copyright by Lauren Frances Turek All Rights Reserved August 2015 ii Abstract “To Bring the Good News to All Nations: Evangelicals, Human Rights, and U.S. Foreign Policy, 1969-1994,” traces the development of evangelical Christian foreign policy lobbying groups in the United States beginning in the 1970s. In contrast to scholarship on the ascendancy of the religious right as a domestic political force, this dissertation focuses on how foreign missionary work contributed to the creation of an influential evangelical lobby with distinct interests in the trajectory of U.S. foreign relations. The vast expansion of evangelical Christianity throughout the world during the 1970s and 1980s nurtured ties between American evangelicals and their co-religionists abroad, creating a diffuse yet energetic global network of faith-based non-state organizations and actors. Drawing on materials from religious as well as government archives in the United States, Guatemala, and South Africa, this project reveals that American missions in Central America and Africa, and efforts to support persecuted evangelicals in the Soviet bloc, played a decisive role in shaping U.S. foreign relations. It argues that evangelicals pushed Congress to grant aid to favored yet repressive regimes in countries such as Guatemala while imposing economic and diplomatic sanctions on nations that persecuted Christians, such as the Soviet Union. In the process, evangelicals developed a limited yet unique perspective on human rights abuses in Eastern Europe and the Global South, which interacted in powerful ways with the revival of human rights activism in the 1970s more broadly. This dissertation adds an important cultural dimension to the study of American foreign policy and politics. In elucidating the international outreach efforts of an influential, globally interconnected group of co-religionists, it places the rise of the religious right in the United States in a global context. Evangelicals viewed themselves as members of a transnational community of believers, and this identity provided the foundation for their political activism. iii Furthermore, this project exposes how Christian interest groups blended their religious beliefs and conservative political ideology to drive national discourse about American foreign relations. In so doing, it shows that their lobbying efforts guided official decision making on key issues. Finally, this dissertation contributes to the growing literature on human rights during the 1970s by demonstrating that evangelical lobbyists used human rights language to influence how policymakers interpreted state violence and repression abroad. In this manner, it uncovers the important role that religious non-state actors have played in shaping international politics and human rights norms. By interrogating the complicated interweaving of evangelical religious convictions, human rights, anti-communism, and foreign affairs, “To Bring the Good News to All Nations” advances our understanding of the diverse factors that drove international relations in the twentieth century. It also underscores key historical moments when religious and ethical values infused American foreign policy, illuminating how American religious culture has melded with core national values to shape the role of the United States as a world power. iv Acknowledgements We often think of researching and writing a dissertation as a solitary task, but I have found the opposite to be true. Throughout this long endeavor, I have been blessed with more help and support than I could possibly deserve from many wonderful advisors, colleagues, family members, and friends. I am profoundly grateful to Melvyn Leffler, who has been a tireless champion of this project from the very beginning. Mel shepherded me through my graduate studies expertly, encouraging me to tackle my coursework strategically and providing me with the freedom I needed to develop as a young scholar. His generous and rigorous feedback encouraged me to write clearly and think incisively. His insights and suggestions have improved my work—and this dissertation—immeasurably. Mel ensured that I had the resources that I needed to pursue my research and his pep talks inspired me to persevere when challenges emerged; he seemed to know instinctively when to provide a kind word or a firm but supportive push to move forward. I cannot imagine a better mentor or role model. Mel is an unparalleled scholar, thinker, and advisor, and I count myself lucky every day to have had the honor of working with him over the past seven years. I also owe a debt of gratitude to a number of other scholars at the University of Virginia who have nurtured this project and aided me in my studies. My dissertation committee—Brian Balogh, Marc Selverstone, and Matt Hedstrom—provided insightful commentary and invaluable support. Valarie Cooper introduced me to the fascinating world of Pentecostalism and played a significant role in shaping this project. I benefited greatly from discussions with Brian Owensby about Latin American history and about Christian missionary work and empire, as well as from his tips on conducting research in Central America. John Edwin Mason shared his expertise on v South African history with me and kindly connected me with his friends and colleagues in Cape Town, ensuring that I had both a productive and enjoyable visit to South Africa. Phyllis Leffler supported my love for public history and museum work, providing me with opportunities to develop leadership experience and build on my exhibition design background, which substantially improved my prospects on the academic job market. Jennifer Burns offered me encouragement early on in graduate school, offering indispensable professional advice in addition to a crash course on the history of American Christianity. Rhonda Barlow, Kate Geoghegan, and Emily Senefeld deserve special thanks. I could not have asked for better colleagues and friends in graduate school. I will cherish forever the long conversations, unflagging support, and comradeship that we shared during our time together at the University of Virginia. I had the tremendous good fortune to spend the 2014-15 academic year at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis. The faculty and staff there provided unparalleled support for this project. I thank Darren Dochuk in particular for his suggestions and insights on the dissertation. Darren, Laurie Maffly-Kipp, Leigh Schmidt, Marie Griffith, Mark Valeri, Lerone Martin, Rachel Lindsay, Ronit Stahl, Maryam Kashani, Stephanie Wolfe, Sheri Peña, and Debra Kennard all offered invaluable feedback on my work and a congenial intellectual home for the year. I could not have researched and written this dissertation without the generous financial support that I received from The John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis, The Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture at the University of Virginia, the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, the American Historical Association, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation at the University of Virginia, the vi University of Virginia Society of Fellows, the Billy Graham Center Archives/The Torrey M. Johnson, Sr. scholarship fund, The Institute of the Humanities and Global Cultures at the University of Virginia, the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, and the Robert J. Huskey Travel fund at the University of Virginia. Countless archivists assisted me in my research. All deserve commendation, but I owe special thanks to Bob Shuster at the Billy Graham Center Archives and Thelma Porres, Blanca Velásquez, Anaís García Salazar, and all of the other staff members at the Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica for their tremendous help and patience. A number of colleagues and scholars read chapters, commented on conference papers, or provided advice or feedback in other ways. I thank Andrew Preston, Cara Burnidge, Mark Edwards, Melani McAlister, Bob Brigham, Virginia Garrard-Burnett, and Randall Balmer. At the University of Virginia, I received helpful feedback and advice on this project at various stages from Sophia Rosenfeld, J.C.A. Stagg, Mark Thomas, Elizabeth Thompson, Jeffrey Rossman, Stephen Schuker, Josh Yates, John Owen, Charles Mathewes, Tony Tian-Ren Lin, Christopher Nichols, Stephen Macekura, Ethan Schrum, James Wilson, Harold Mock, Evan McCormick, Ben Brady, Shannon Nix, Mary Barton, Kelly Winck, Alexandra Evans, Brian Rosenwald, Joseph Scott, Marston Crumpler, Philip Herrington, Cecilia Márquez, Tamika Richeson, Alec Hickmott, Mary Hicks, Cody Perkins, John Terry, Willa Brown, and Chris Cornelius. I also benefited from good cheer and administrative support of Kathleen Miller, Ella Wood, and Jenni Via. Finally, I thank the dear friends and family who supported me through this process. Rachel Rehl, Chris and Doreen Siciliano, Brian and Kelly Hargraves, Michael and Lindsay Burke, Lucy Kwon, Karena Wong, Lauren Hunter, Nicole Gitau, Jeff Coleman, Berenice
Recommended publications
  • Expiration and Vacancies Governor July 2021
    State of Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability Expiration and Vacancies Governor July 2021 802 Stratton Office Building Springfield, IL 62706 Phone: 217/782-5320 Fax: 217/782-3515 http://cgfa.ilga.gov JOINT COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES House Republican Leader/Chairperson Rep. Jim Durkin Senate Republican Leader Sen. Dan McConchie President of the Senate Sen. Don Harmon Speaker of the House Rep. Emanuel “Chris” Welch COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT FORECASTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY Co-Chairperson Sen. David Koehler Co-Chairperson Rep. C. D. Davidsmeyer Executive Director Clayton Klenke Deputy Director Laurie Eby Senators Representatives Omar Aquino Amy Elik Darren Bailey Amy Grant Donald P. DeWitte Sonya Harper Elgie Sims Elizabeth Hernandez Dave Syverson Anna Moeller The Commission on Government Forecasting & Accountability is a bipartisan legislative support service agency that is responsible for advising the Illinois General Assembly on economic and fiscal policy issues and for providing objective policy research for legislators and legislative staff. The Commission’s board is comprised of twelve legislators-split evenly between the House and Senate and between Democrats and Republicans. The Commission has three internal units--Revenue, Pensions, and Research, each of which has a staff of analysts and researchers who analyze policy proposals, legislation, state revenues & expenditures, and benefit programs, and who provide research services to members and staff of the General Assembly. The Commission’s Revenue and Pension Units annually publish a number of statutorily mandated reports as well as on-demand reports in regard to Illinois’ financial and economic condition, the annual operating and capital budgets, public employee retirement systems, and other policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Intuit Inc. Political Contributions February 2020 – July 2020
    Intuit Inc. Political Contributions February 2020 – July 2020 State Candidate Name Office Party Amount CA Marc Berman Assembly D $2,000 CA Steven Bradford Senate D $2,000 CA Autumn Burke Assembly D $2,000 CA Phillip Chen Assembly D $2,000 CA David Chiu Assembly D $2,000 CA Ed Chau Assembly D $2,000 CA Jim Cooper Assembly D $2,000 CA Steven M. Glazer Senate D $2,000 CA Adam Gray Assembly D $2,000 CA Tim Grayson Assembly D $2,000 CA Robert M. Hertzberg Senate D $2,000 CA Jacqui Irwin Assembly D $2,000 CA Sydney Kamlager Assembly D $2,000 CA Kevin Kiley Assembly D $2,000 CA Monique Limón Senate D $2,000 CA Evan Low Assembly D $2,000 CA Fiona Ma Treasurer D $4,500 CA Brian Mainschein Assembly D $2,000 CA Mike McGuire Senate D $2,000 CA John M. W. Moorlach Senate R $2,000 CA Kevin Mullin Assembly D $2,000 CA Gavin Newsom Governor D $10,000 CA Janet Nguyen Assembly R $2,000 CA Jim Nielsen Controller R $2,000 CA Anthony J. Portantino Senate D $2,000 CA Henry Stern Senate D $2,000 CA Phil Ting Assembly D $2,000 CA Scott Wiener Senate D $2,000 CA Scott Wilk Senate R $2,000 CA California Democratic Party N/A D $38,800 CA California Republican Party N/A R $16,200 State Candidate Name Office Party Amount IL Bill Brady Senate R $2,000 IL Kelly Burke House D $2,000 IL Cristina Castro Senate D $1,500 IL Jacqui Collins Senate D $500 IL CD Davidsmeyer House R $250 IL Don DeWitte Senate R $500 IL Jim Durkin House R $2,000 IL Emil Jones III Senate D $1,000 IL Camille Lilly House D $750 IL Bob Rita House D $1,000 IL Keith Wheeler House R $1,000 GA John Albers
    [Show full text]
  • US Evangelicals and the Counterculture
    Dossiê: Fundamentalismos e Democracia – Artigo Original DOI – 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2020v18n57p924 “High on Jesus”: US evangelicals and the counterculture “Viajando em Jesus”: os evangélicos norte-americanos e a contracultura1 Axel R. Schäfer Abstract The political mobilization of conservative Protestants in the United States since the 1970s is commonly viewed as having resulted from a “backlash” against the alleged iniquities of the 1960s, including the excess-es of the counterculture. In contrast, this article maintains that conservative Protestant efforts to infiltrate and absorb the counterculture contributed to the organizational strength, cultural attractiveness, and politi-cal efficacy of the New Christian Right. The essay advances three arguments: First, that evangelicals did not simply reject the countercultural ideas of the 1960s, but absorbed and extended its key sentiments. Second, that conservative Protestantism’s appropriation of countercultural rhetoric and organizational styles played a significant role in the right-wing political mobilization of evangelicals. And third, that the merger of evan-gelical Christianity and countercultural styles, rather than their antagonism, ended up being one of the most enduring legacies of the sixties. In revisiting the relationship between the counterculture and evangelicalism, the essay also explores the larger implications for understanding the relationship between religion and poli-tics. The New Christian Right domesticated genuinely insurgent impulses within the evangelical resurgence. By the same token, it nurtured the conservative components of the counterculture. Conservative Protestant-ism thus constituted a political movement that channeled insurgencies into a cultural form that relegitimized the fundamental trajectories of liberal capitalism and consumerist society. Keywords: Backlash argument. Jesus Movement. Evangelical left.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-Mid-Year-Political-Contributions
    1 Verizon Political Activity January – June 2018 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies -- from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more -- that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 18 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon and its affiliates during the first half of 2018. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Executive Vice President, Public Policy and General Counsel 2 Verizon Political Activity January – June 2018 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Democratic Process What are the Verizon Political Action Committees? regulations govern many aspects of the contributions process including the setting of monetary contribution limitations and The Verizon Political Action Committees (PACs) exist to help the establishment of periodic reporting requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Ethics & the Realm of Statecraft
    PROVIDENCE INAUGURAL ISSUE FALL 2015 A JOURNAL OF CHRISTIANITY & AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY CHRISTIAN ETHICS & THE REALM OF STATECRAFT: DIVISIONS, CROSS-CURRENTS, & THE SEARCH FOR CONNECTIONS BY JAMES TURNER JOHNSON SPONSORED BY LESS HEGEL, MORE HISTORY! CHRISTIAN ETHICS & POLITICAL REALITIES BY NIGEL BIGGAR FALL CHRISTIAN REALISM & U.S. FOREIGN POLICY BY JOSEPH LOCONTE 2015 ALSO: MARK TOOLEY ON CHRISTIAN POLITICAL DUTY • BRYAN MCGRAW ON VIOLENCE • BARONESS COX ON JIHAD • ALAN DOWD ON THE MORALITY OF DETERRENCE • TIMOTHY MALLARD ON WAR • MARC LIVECCHE ON MORAL INJURY • ROBERT NICHOLSON ON BOUNDARIES, COMMUNITY, & THE MIDDLE EAST • WALTER RUSSELL MEAD ON THE COSTS OF CHRISTIAN RETREAT • Number 1 Declinism. Joffe thinks that true American decline is pos- sible only if America itself decides to decline, which he Subscribe to believes no superpower has PROVIDENCE ever done. He discerns in the Providence: FALL 2015 NUMBER 1 current obsession with de- cline an American desire to es- A Journal of Christianity & INAUGURAL EDITORIAL cape from global responsibil- ity. Christians and especially American Foreign Policy Evangelicals, preoccupied with MARK TOOLEY a much more narrow strata of American & Christian Duty events and impressions, can learn much from Joffe, who 04 in Today’s World speaks with the grim historical reality of a Jewish European FEATURES who realizes that American leadership and confidence NIGEL BIGGAR are essential for international Less Hegel, More History! Christian order. Can Christians operate from Ethics & Political Realities 10 a similarly broad historical and international perspective in appreciating the geopolit- JAMES TURNER JOHNSON ical and moral necessity of American global hegemony? Christian Ethics & the Realm The Evangelical Left is un- likely to abandon its obsessive of Statecraft: Divisions, Cross-Currents, and contradictory anti-Amer- 18 icanism, wanting American & the Search for Connections apology and retreat while at the same time demanding America reshape the world according to the Evangelical JOSEPH LOCONTE Left’s policy desires.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN–AMERICAN FULBRIGHT COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT Commission Board Members
    2012 AUSTRALIAN–AMERICAN FULBRIGHT COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT Commission Board Members American Dr Ian Thomas Professor Margaret Gardner, AO President Vice Chancellor Professor Don DeBats Boeing Australia & South Pacific RMIT University (until December 2012) Head, Department of American Ms Jane Hardy Studies Mr Frank C. Urbancic, Jr. Assistant Secretary, Flinders University Consul General of the United States Branch Mr Marshall B. Farrer United States of America Americas Division Managing Director (until October 2012) Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (until January 2012) Brown-Forman Australia / N.Z. Ms Mary Burce Warlick Mr Paul Houge Consul General of the Ms Libby Schick Counselor for Public Affairs United States of America Assistant Secretary Embassy of the United (since November 2012) United States Branch States of America Department of Foreign Affairs and (since September 2012) AUSTRALIAN Trade (since February 2012) Ms Judy Moon Professor Steven Schwartz, Mr. Colin Walters Counselor for Public Affairs AM (Chair) Group Manager, International Group Office of Public Affairs Vice-Chancellor Department of Education, Embassy of the United States of Macquarie University Employment & Workplace Relations (until December 2012) America Professor Hilary Charlesworth (until July 2012) ARC Laureate Fellow Director, Centre for International Governance and Justice, The Australian National University Commission Staff CURRENT Mr Pablo Jimenez Ms Kate Lyall Dr Tangerine Holt Partnerships Coordinator Program Officer, Special Programs (from December
    [Show full text]
  • The Partisan Trajectory of the American Pro-Life Movement: How a Liberal Catholic Campaign Became a Conservative Evangelical Cause
    Religions 2015, 6, 451–475; doi:10.3390/rel6020451 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article The Partisan Trajectory of the American Pro-Life Movement: How a Liberal Catholic Campaign Became a Conservative Evangelical Cause Daniel K. Williams Department of History, University of West Georgia, 1601 Maple St., Carrollton, GA 30118, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-678-839-6034 Academic Editor: Darren Dochuk Received: 25 February 2015 / Accepted: 3 April 2015 / Published: 16 April 2015 Abstract: This article employs a historical analysis of the religious composition of the pro-life movement to explain why the partisan identity of the movement shifted from the left to the right between the late 1960s and the 1980s. Many of the Catholics who formed the first anti-abortion organizations in the late 1960s were liberal Democrats who viewed their campaign to save the unborn as a rights-based movement that was fully in keeping with the principles of New Deal and Great Society liberalism, but when evangelical Protestants joined the movement in the late 1970s, they reframed the pro-life cause as a politically conservative campaign linked not to the ideology of human rights but to the politics of moral order and “family values.” This article explains why the Catholic effort to build a pro-life coalition of liberal Democrats failed after Roe v. Wade, why evangelicals became interested in the antiabortion movement, and why the evangelicals succeeded in their effort to rebrand the pro-life campaign as a conservative cause. Keywords: Pro-life; abortion; Catholic; evangelical; conservatism 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeland Fascism Today: an Introduction”
    Editor’s Preface “Homeland Fascism Today: An Introduction” Jeff Shantz There is a certain complacency, perhaps arro- gance, among commentators in the United States concerning the prospects for violent uprisings or mo- bilizations in the US. It is widely held that violent uprisings, coups, oppositional movements, will not, even cannot, emerge or take hold in the United States. America is viewed as a stable system with democratic checks and balances and a civil makeup mitigating against such dramatic eruptions in the body politic. Furthermore, truly oppositional move- ments are viewed as being too small, too marginal, or too trivial to pose a real challenge to the liberal democratic order of things in the United States. There are some recurring factors that historically appear as what might be preconditions for dramatic social upheaval and change. These are: extreme eco- nomic inequality; significant, major economic or po- litical crisis or shock, usually unexpected; a middle iii IV | HOMELAND FASCISM strata that feels threatened or is experiencing eco- nomic threats (Judson 2009, 174). Conflict can be triggered by a dramatic event such as a coup d’état, ri- ots, a terrorist attack, etc. (Judson 2009, 174). Responses to these issues are also important. Does the middle strata mobilize against specific scapegoats (migrants, minorities, unionists, etc.) or focus anger at a ruling elite? Does the government lose legitimacy or offer a believable remedy to the problems? Does it maintain legalistic means or resort to force and vio- lence? Conditions typically giving rise to upheaval are present throughout US society. Millions have lost jobs and others the prospect of finding jobs that pay a sus- tainable living wage and/or offer some financial secu- rity.
    [Show full text]
  • 101St General Assembly U of I Caucus
    101st General Assembly U of I Caucus Senators Senator Neil Anderson (R) 36th District Biography: Raised in the Quad CIty area and helped with the family business of installing floors. He graduated from the University of Nebraska and played on the football team. After graduating, he became a firefighter in the Moline Department and a paramedic in 2006. He resides in Rock Island with his wife and two children. Senator Jason Barickman (R) 53rd District Biography: Born May 1, 1975 in Streator, Illinois; raised on family UIUC alum farm in Livingston County; Graduated Woodland High School. Veteran of his service in uniform while an infantry soldier in the Illinois Army National Guard. Graduated from Illinois State University and then the University of Illinois College of Law. Principal with law office of Meyer Capel, P.C. Selected to inaugural class of the 2012 Edgar Fellows Leadership Program. Member of Illinois House from 2011-2013. Resides in Bloomington with wife, Kristin, as well as their two sons and a daughter. Senator Scott Bennett (D) 52nd District Biography: Grew up in Gibson City; B.A. in History, Illinois State UIUC alum University; J.D. from University of Illinois College of Law; former Assistant State's Attorney for Champaign and McLean counties; Past President of the Urbana Rotary; Attorney; married (wife, Stacy), has two children. Senator Bill Cunningham (D) 18th District Biography: Served in the House from 2011-13; full-time state UIC alum legislator and lifelong resident of the southwest Chicago area; born July 21, 1967; graduate of Saint Barnabas Grammar School (1981), Mount Carmel High School (1985) and the University of Illinois Chicago (1990); former advisor to Cook County Sheriff Mike Sheahan and former chief of staff to Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart; youth soccer coach; parent representative on the Sutherland Local School Council; lives in Beverly with wife, Juliana, and two daughters, Madeline and Olivia.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Changing American Evangelical Attitudes Towards
    Changing American Evangelical Attitudes towards Roman Catholics: 1960-2000 Don Sweeting Don Sweeting is Senior Pastor of Introduction summing up forty years of evangelicalism Cherry Creek Presbyterian Church, in In 1960, Presidential campaign historian since 1945, Bayly said, “We inherited a Englewood, Colorado. He has also Theodore H. White observed that “the Berlin Wall between evangelical Chris- served as the founding pastor of the largest and most important division in tians and Roman Catholics; we bequeath Chain of Lakes Community Bible Church American society was that between Prot- a spirit of love and rapprochement on in Antioch, Illinois. Dr. Sweeting was estants and Catholics.”1 As a vital part of the basis of the Bible rather than fear and educated at Moody Bible Institute, American Protestant life, evangelicalism hatred.”7 Lawrence University, Oxford University reflected the strains of this conflict.2 Anti- By the mid 1990s, it was clear that atti- (M.A.), and Trinity Evangelical Divinity Catholicism, according to church historian tudes were changing. On a local level, School (Ph.D.) where he wrote his dis- George Marsden, “was simply an unques- evangelicals and Catholics were meeting sertation on the relationship between tioned part of the fundamentalist- to discuss issues from poverty and wel- evangelicals and Roman Catholics. evangelicalism of the day.”3 fare reform to abortion. On the national This posture of outright public hostil- level changes were also apparent. Evan- ity was evidenced in many ways. It could gelical publishing houses were printing be seen in the opposition of many evan- books by Catholic authors. Some evangeli- gelical leaders to the presidential candi- cal parachurch ministries began placing dacy of John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Die US-Amerikanische First Lady Und Die Inszenierung Der Präsidentenehe in Den Wahlkämpfen 1964 - 1996
    Die US-amerikanische First Lady und die Inszenierung der Präsidentenehe in den Wahlkämpfen 1964 - 1996 Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophischen Fakultät der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Detlef Junker Zweitgutachter: PD Dr. Philipp Gassert Vorgelegt von Christine Weiss Isländische Str. 1 10439 Berlin Tel: 0163 3388109 Email: [email protected] Inhalt iii Inhalt Abbildungsverzeichnis.............................................................................................v Abkürzungsverzeichnis..........................................................................................vii A Einleitung........................................................................................................9 B Die First Ladys in den Wahlkämpfen 1964 - 1996....................................18 B 1 Die First Ladys in den Wahlkämpfen vor 1964......................................20 B 2 Lady Bird Johnson: Der Wahlkampf 1964.............................................33 B 2.1 Kurzbiographie ..............................................................................33 B 2.2 Der Wahlkampf 1964.....................................................................34 B 3 Pat Nixon: Die Wahlkämpfe 1968 und 1972..........................................50 B 3.1 Kurzbiographie ..............................................................................51 B 3.2 Der Wahlkampf 1968.....................................................................51 B 3.3 Der Wahlkampf 1972.....................................................................55
    [Show full text]