Monitor 49 Constitution Unit Newsletter | October 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monitor 49 Constitution Unit Newsletter | October 2011 Monitor 49 Constitution Unit Newsletter | October 2011 Clegg delivers for the Conservatives Constitutional reform is generally believed to be the Liberal The table shows where a commitment in the Programme for Democrats’ contribution to the coalition government’s agenda. Government came from: the Lib Dem manifesto (col 2), the The Conservatives certainly do not see themselves as constitutional Conservative manifesto (col 3), or both. Of the 14 items listed, reformers. But before the election their reform agenda was as 10 were in the Conservative manifesto, and eight in the Lib extensive as the Liberal Democrats: see the Unit’s Briefing 148 Dem manifesto. on The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform. Column 4 headed Result indicates whether the commitment is likely Nick Clegg said last May that one reason for joining the coalition was to be delivered or not. This requires some educated guesswork, and to deliver the Lib Dems’ long-held plans for constitutional reform. In not everyone will agree with the forecasts. Those who disagree can government he leads on the whole constitutional reform programme. insert their own, to see if they come to a different overall conclusion. But early analysis suggests that at the end of this government, Clegg The provisional analysis of this scorecard suggests that at the end of will have delivered more of the Conservative package of constitutional this Parliament Nick Clegg will have delivered six of the Conservative reforms than his own. In particular, he has not succeeded on the AV commitments for constitutional reform, but only four of his own. He referendum and is unlikely to accomplish Lords reform, the Lib Dems’ will get little credit from the Conservatives for this, because they do two biggest priorities. not see themselves as constitutional reformers. The risk is that he will be damned by his own side for his failures, and ignored by the The analysis is in Table 1 below and shows the main constitutional Conservatives for his successes. reform items in the coalition’s Programme for Government. It is inevitably a crude score card, listing all the reforms as if they were Table 1. Constitutional reforms in the Coalition Programme for equal, when some are clearly more important than others. Government, and their origins Programme for Government LD C Result Lib Dem manifesto Conservative manifesto Introduce proportional voting system, Referendum on AV x Retain first past the post • preferably STV Reduce House of Commons to √ Reduce to 500 MPs if elected by STV Reduce to 585 MPs 600 MPs • • Introduce referendum on further Give Welsh Assembly primary Will not stand in the way of Welsh √ Welsh devolution • • legislative powers referendum on further legislative powers Implement Calman Commission Implement Calman on new powers to √ White Paper on how to deal with Calman in Scotland • • Scotland Make royal prerogative subject to greater Fixed term parliaments √ Fixed term parliaments • parliamentary control Legislate so that future treaties are Amend ECA 1972 so that future Treaties √ subject to ‘referendum lock’ • subject to referendum lock Hold referendums on elected Give citizens in England’s 12 largest cities √ mayors in 12 largest English cities • chance of having an elected mayor Wholly or mainly elected second Build consensus for a mainly elected x Elected House of Lords chamber • • second chamber Replace Human Rights Act with Commission on British bill of rights x Protect the Human Rights Act • • UK bill of rights Commission on West Lothian x English votes on English laws Question • Power of recall in the event of Power of recall triggered by proven Right of recall of MPs √ • • serious wrongdoing serious wrongdoing 200 all postal primaries • x All postal primaries Petitions to force issues onto Petitions to force issues √ Parliament’s agenda • onto Parliament’s agenda Seek agreement on comprehensive Cap donations at £10k, limit spending Reform of party funding x • • reform to include donations cap through electoral cycle Key: • = manifesto commitment fully incorporated into Programme for Government • = manifesto commitment only partially incorporated √ = likely to be delivered X = unlikely to be delivered. Monitor 49 | Constitution Unit Newsletter | October 2011 | ISSN 1465–4377 | Page 2 welcomed by peers while others, such as giving greater control to the PARLIAMENT chair in debates, were more controversial. Some proposals, including establishment of a legislative standards committee, received a somewhat lukewarm government response. Lord Strathclyde promised that the chamber would have ‘the chance to approve or reject proposals for implementing a range of the group’s recommendations... Government plans for Lords reform at the earliest available opportunity’, once the Procedure Committee and other committees have considered the details. Officially, following the publication of the White Paper and draft bill in May, Lords reform is proceeding smoothly, with a bill to be Election of New Lord Speaker introduced next year. The proposal is to move to a largely or wholly elected chamber, chosen by proportional representation. However, Baroness Hayman’s five-year term of office as Lord Speaker has the obstacles to this occurring remain significant (as discussed in ended, and elections were held for her replacement. There were Monitor 48). The White Paper and bill were debated in both chambers six candidates, with the result announced on 18 July. Lord Goodlad in June (in the Lords on 21 and 22, in the Commons on 27), and (Conservative) had initially been considered a frontrunner, but the came in for heavy criticism. Numerous objections were raised in both election was won by Baroness D’Souza (Crossbench). She had only chambers, by representatives of all parties and none, with only a weeks before ended her four-year stint as convener of the Crossbench small number of supportive speeches. Key issues include whether peers. The new Crossbench convener is Lord Laming. the chamber should be 80% or 100% elected, whether 15 year non- At a hustings meeting organised by the Hansard Society, all renewable terms are appropriate, and whether such a large change candidates for Lord Speaker were cautious about proposals for should be subject to a referendum (which is not currently proposed). reforming working practices; they expressed a desire to retain ‘self- But the biggest issue of all was the likely effect on the balance of regulation’ and showed a lack of enthusiasm for giving the Lord powers between the two chambers. Clause 2 of the bill, which states Speaker more powers. Ultimately, as all candidates emphasised, that ‘Nothing in the provisions of this Act... affects the primacy of the it will be for members of the chamber to decide these matters. House of Commons... or the conventions governing the relationship between the two Houses’ has already become somewhat notorious. NAO report on IPSA Not only is it impossible to legislate meaningfully for such a matter, but the claim that the relationship will remain unchanged is widely On 7 July the National Audit Office published a report into the questioned. Some believe that changes to the chamber’s membership operation of the new Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority will strengthen it vis-à-vis the Commons, and welcome this: they (IPSA), which was created following the MPs’ expenses scandal. include Lords leader Lord Strathclyde, who stated this repeatedly in Ever since its establishment IPSA has been subjected to significant the chamber when the proposals were announced on 17 May. Some, criticism, particularly from MPs and their staff. The NAO gave a including the minister responsible for the bill, Nick Clegg, claim that mixed scorecard, congratulating IPSA for getting up and running so the relationship will remain unchanged. Many others anticipate a quickly, and for providing a full service to MPs after May 2010, but strengthening, but consider this undesirable. suggesting that the procedures in place are onerous for MPs and that more should be done to address this. It recommended that IPSA These will all be issues closely examined by the parliamentary joint should work with the parliamentary authorities to try and minimise the committee on the bill, which was established in July. It comprises inconvenience and cost to MPs of the existing scheme. 13 peers and 13 MPs, and will be chaired by former (Labour) Lords leader, Lord Richard. The committee has initially been given until Process of Constitutional Change the end of February to report, but is widely expected to ask for more time. It will certainly have a lot to consider, and has invited In July the Lords Constitution Committee published their report on the written submissions, ideally by 12 October. Notable members of the Process of Constitutional Change, following a six-month inquiry. The committee include constitutional academics Lord (Philip) Norton of report says it is not acceptable for the UK to have no agreed process Louth, and Lord (Peter) Hennessy of Nympsfield. A bill may or may for constitutional change when the constitution is the foundation not be included in the Queen’s speech in May 2012. upon which law and government are built. The government should not be able to ‘pick and choose’ what processes apply in different Internal Lords reforms debated cases. Constitutional legislation should meet the highest standards of consultation, consideration and scrutiny. Internal reforms of the Lords working practices may have a better prospect of success, and there have now been two reports by two The report sets out a ‘comprehensive package’ of processes which separate Leader’s Groups, chaired by Lord Hunt of Wirral (on options governments should follow to ensure it meets these standards, for retirement), and Lord Goodlad (on working practices more widely), including publishing green and white papers and draft bills. respectively. These were outlined in Monitors 47 and 48. The Hunt The committee adds that the minister responsible for initiating report proposed that members should be able voluntarily to retire constitutional change should explain to Parliament the processes used from the chamber.
Recommended publications
  • The Sub-State Politics of the Welsh [British?] Conservative Party 1997-2007
    MSc(Econ) in the Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc(Econ) Welsh Politics and Society (RT) ‘Change’ or ‘Continuity?’ The Sub-State Politics of the Welsh [British?] Conservative Party 1997-2007 Tomos Dafydd Davies September, 2008 DECLARATIONS The word length of this dissertation is 14992 words, including footnotes Signed……………………………………… Date………………………………………... I hereby declare that this thesis has not already been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being currently submitted in candidature for any other degree. It is the result of my own independent investigation and all authorities and sources, which have been consulted, are acknowledged in the bibliography. Signed……………………………………… Date………………………………………... STATEMENT 1 This work is the result of my own investigations, except when otherwise stated. When correction services have been used the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in footnote(s). Signed……………………………………… Date………………………………………... STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my work, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed……………………………………… Date………………………………………... - 2 - ‘Change’ or ‘Continuity?’ The Sub-State Politics of the Welsh [British?] Conservative Party ABSTRACT ___________________________________ A notable characteristic of the academic literature has hitherto been a largely unquestioning acceptance that political parties should be studied with reference to their role within the nation-state. The response of state-wide political parties to the establishment of sub-state government remains a relatively neglected research area. This thesis seeks to remedy this situation by analyzing the Conservative Party’s adaptation to devolution in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welsh Conservative Party and the National Assembly of Wales 1997
    MSc (Econ) Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of: MSc (Econ) Welsh Politics & Society (RT) The Welsh Conservative Party and the National Assembly of Wales 1997 – 2010 Kristian Hicks P a g e | 1 Abstract The Conservative Party in Wales has undergone a great deal of change since the creation of the National Assembly in 1999. As a party that vociferously opposed the passing of any devolution settlement,1 the ‘Yes’ outcome of the devolution referendum would push the party into a crisis of relevancy. How exactly does a conservative deal such changes in the structure of a political system? What are the environmental push-pull factors and themes that emanate from such a change?2 This dissertation seeks to explore such questions and also communicates the experiences of the Welsh Conservative party in the age of devolution. The structure of this dissertation is chronological in nature.3 It begins with the experiences of the Conservatives in the first assembly onwards to the present at the time of writing (2010). A myriad of materials will be utilised from the works of Conservative philosophers, specialists in devolution specifically of the Welsh form4, works on Welsh history and journalistic articles. 1 John Major, You can only be sure with the Conservatives, Conservative and Unionist Party Manifesto, 1997, P. 1 2 These themes include party leadership, the relationship between the Welsh and National party and the philosophy of conservatism as applied to institutional change amongst others. 4 Especially through the findings of the devolution monitoring reports.
    [Show full text]
  • 18/Spring 98
    Merger Hopes and Fears Were They Realised? Alliance into merger: how has it worked? Rt. Hon. Alan Beith, MP examines the myths and the realities. It seems an age since a number of us were the Tories at the one after. The Social Democrats who backed merger, condemned to endless meetings in often miserable and had to put up with undisguised bitterness – but never smoke-filled – rooms for the merger and calumny from others in their party as a negotiations between the Liberals and the SDP. Was result, saw merger as essential to the continu- ance of their mission to provide an electable it really only ten years ago? Were we once in separate and responsible alternative to the Tories. They parties? Did the process of merger really have to be realised that what they had achieved in detach- so painful and damaging, given that the party which ing so many from the Labour Party and at- tracting significant new support would not last emerged became, after the first couple of years, a if they remained in competition with the Lib- very congenial party to be in and one which is now erals. They hoped to advance many policies enjoying well-deserved success? which they found they shared with Liberals. Then there were the fears which made the It is instructive to look back to the hopes negotiations so difficult. Liberals feared that and fears which surrounded the Alliance and Liberal identity in the minds of voters would the merger. Liberals hoped to prevent the dis- be lost, and that Liberalism itself could be dan- sipation and division of their potential support gerously diluted in the philosophy and poli- which resulted from competition between the cies of the new party.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Thinkers
    REPOrt – liBERAL thiNKERS Was such ‘pre-membering’ public Liberal Thinkers adoration, politics or ego? While Bounous conceded that there may Conference fringe meeting, 5 October 2014, with Alan have been an element of personal Beith, John Pugh, Liz Barker and Mark Pack; chair: Malcolm vanity, for example in the cor- ner stone of the Council House, Bruce the timing of the monuments was Report by Douglas Oliver much more suggestive of politically motivated public demonstration. The clock tower in the Jewellery he Liberal Democrat His- twentieth century: Foreign Sec- Quarter was timed in relation to tory Group met on the retary Edward Grey and the man his resignation from government TSunday night of the Octo- often credited with designing the and renewed his links to small busi- ber Federal Conference to dis- modern welfare state, Sir William nessmen. ‘Old Joe’, the tower at the cuss ‘Liberal Thinkers’ in an event Beveridge. Beith recalled that when university of which Chamberlain scheduled to tie in with the pam- he arrived in the area in the early was a principal sponsor, served to phlet of the same name released for 1970s, Beveridge’s ‘first-principles’ distract from the Boer War but also the first time in Glasgow. approach and reflective poise was reminded the community of his Musing upon his long involve- still widely remembered by locals commitment to promoting educa- ment with the party, the discus- in their mutual corner of north-east tion. There are more – and more In his book sion’s chair Malcolm Bruce – the England. Beveridge was known in prominent – monuments to Cham- outgoing MP for Gordon, appear- the area for his sometimes philo- berlain than to John Bright or Tory of essays, ing at his last autumn conference sophical village hall discursives; hero Colonel Burnaby, each popu- as a Westminster representative and whilst he did occasionally lar in his time.
    [Show full text]
  • Nations and Regions: the Dynamics of Devolution
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Devolution and the Centre Quarterly Report February 2003 by Guy Lodge The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust 1 Contents Contents Key Points 1 Devolution and Westminster 1.1 House of Lords Debate on the Constitution 1.2 New Breakaway Conservative Party 1.3 House of Lords Constitution Committee 1.4 Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill 1.5 Parliamentary Questions to the Wales Office 1.6 The Work of the Territorial Select Committees 1.7 The Work of the Grand Committees 1.8 Select Committee on the Lord Chancellor’s Department 1.9 Minority Party Representation on Select Committees 1.10 Barnett Formula 1.11 House of Lords Reform 2 Devolution and Whitehall 2.1 Edwina Hart accuses Whitehall of obstructing National Assembly 2.2 Helen Liddell Announces Decision on MSP Numbers 2.3 The Future of the Territorial Offices 3 Intergovernmental Relations 3.1 Meeting of JMC (Europe) 3.2 British-Irish Council Summit 3.3 Meeting of the British-Irish Council Environment Group 3.4 Meeting of the British-Irish Council Drugs Group 3.5 UK Government and the Devolved Bodies Launch the Animal Health and Welfare Strategy Consultation 2 Key Points • Assembly Finance Minister Edwina Hart criticises Whitehall civil servants • Lord Norton debate on the British Constitution in the House of Lords • Helen Liddell announces that the number of MSPs will remain at 129 in the outcome of the consultation on the size of the Scottish Parliament. • House of Lords Constitution Committee publishes Devolution: Inter- Institutional Relations in the United Kingdom • House of Lords debate on the Barnett Formula • Second Reading and Committee Stage of the Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill • Seven options for Lords Reform fail to gain a majority.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2011 Welsh General Election: an Analysis of the Latest Staging Post in the Maturing of Welsh Politics
    democraticaudit.com http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=3008 The 2011 Welsh General Election: an analysis of the latest staging post in the maturing of Welsh Politics By Democratic Audit The May 2011 Welsh General Election represented an important staging post in the development of a mature democracy as it followed immediately from the referendum result which gave the Assembly full-primary legislative powers. Here Michael Cole draws on an article written with Professor Laura McAllister, recently published by Parliamentary Affairs, to discuss the campaign, its results and the operation of the electoral system. Policy themes and campaign debates The responsibilities of Welsh government pushed the agenda onto topics like health, transport, economic development and education. This focus also reflected the centre-left orientation of Welsh politics, with a much greater belief in universalism and the worth of state provision. The campaign was influenced by fall-out from the referendum. Specifically, Plaid expected an electoral bonus from the ‘yes’ result to match that of the first Assembly election, a confidence that perhaps explained their lacklustre and disjointed campaign. The campaign was (of course) affected by ongoing devolution dynamics. Specifically, Plaid sought the transfer of a range of significant functions to the Assembly, for example criminal justice, broadcasting, energy and natural resources, and the railways. Alternatively, Labour suggested no specific proposals to move additional responsibilities to Wales, while the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats advanced more modest agendas, for example shifting policing and justice and large-scale energy projects (Liberal Democrats) and smaller-energy schemes and Network Rail (Conservatives). Results Welsh Labour was the clear winner, returning 30 AMs, enough to enable the formation of a single-party government.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Reform Put on Hold in This Issue
    | THE CONSTITUTION UNIT NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 41 | JANUARY 2009 | MONITOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM PUT ON HOLD IN THIS ISSUE Amidst the gathering economic gloom the be considered against the ‘backdrop’ of declining government’s constitutional reform plans are voter turn-out. The Conference’s mandate to PARLIAMENT 2 being quietly shelved. After the fanfare for The discover ways to make parliament’s membership Governance of Britain in summer 2007, the mirror the diversity in the UK population at large draft Constitutional Renewal Bill was greeted by is as urgent as ever: since 1918 a total of 4,659 PARTIES AND ELECTIONS 2-3 parliamentarians as a bit of a disappointment when Members have been elected to Parliament. Of they scrutinised its detailed proposals a year later. these, just 291 (6%) have been women. Of 646 That might be why the Constitutional Renewal current Members, only 15 are black or Asian. WATCHDOGS 3 Bill did not feature in the legislative programme announced in the Queen’s Speech in November. Speaker’s Conferences are rare: this will be only the sixth ever. Five were formed in the It may yet be included; but more likely is that CHURCH AND STATE 3 some proposals (eg the Civil Service bill) will be 20th century to consider reforms to the electoral introduced separately, in the summer. system, such as seat distribution and minimum voting age. They embody a parliamentary HUMAN RIGHTS 3 A similar sense of slippage afflicts plans for convention that controversial changes to electoral a British Bill of Rights. The government first law should be agreed on an all-party basis, promised to publish a consultation paper by the although this convention has not always been DEVOLUTION 4-5 spring of 2008; then the summer; then the autumn.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Autumn Conference
    ONLINE AUTUMN CONFERENCE 2021 17-20 SEPTEMBER DIRECTORY NEU Network Help us shape the future of education: be part of the National Education Union Councillor network. Being a member of our network will give you: > Access to written briefings. > Regular information about education issues. > Access to our events for councillors. The NEU Councillors Network is open to councillors from all political parties. The Network is now over 4,000 members strong. Join our Network at neu.org.uk/councillors-network or by scanning the QR code e [email protected] @neucllrs @NEUCllrs NEU2258/0721 NEU2258 Lib Dem advert 2 FP.indd 1 26/07/2021 13:42 CONFERENCE DIRECTORY 1 Welcome to the Liberal Democrat Online Autumn 2021 Conference Directory. Please note that the Conference Directory is available online only and not in hard copy format. Updates to the Conference Directory will be issued periodically up until conference and published online at: www.libdems.org.uk/a21-directory For details of the main auditorium sessions, see the separate Conference Agenda, available at: www.libdems.org.uk/a21-agenda Further information, registration and conference publications (including plain text and clear print versions) are available at: www.libdems.org.uk/conference Contents Feature: 2–3 Welcome to our online Autumn Conference from Ed Davey MP and Mark Pack Conference information: 4–9 Exhibition: 11–15 Fringe and training: 16–65 Friday 17 September 19 Saturday 18 September 27 Sunday 19 September 46 Monday 20 September 59 Autumn 2021 Directory vsn 2 Published and promoted by Mike Dixon on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, 1 Vincent Square, London, SW1P 2PN.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1924 Labour Government and the Failure of the Whips
    The 1924 Labour Government and the Failure of the Whips by Michael Meadowcroft The first Labour government has been the subject of much research aided by a remarkable number of MPs who served in the 1924 parliament who either wrote memoirs or were the subject of biographies. However, though there is a consensus on the underlying strategic aim of Labour to use the arithmetic of the Liberals’ political dilemma to deal the party a lethal blow, there has been no focus hitherto on the day-to-day parliamentary process and the lack of a clear Labour strategy in government. There was neither a tactical decision to have measures that the Liberals could be expected to support, nor a deliberate policy to press forward with more socialist legislation that would please its own MPs, or at least the more vocal of them, and deliberately challenge the Liberal MPs. Instead the government continued along an almost day-to-day existence. The Labour parliamentary party had no collective experience of managing parliament and singularly failed to learn the tricks of the trade, not least as a consequence of the failure of the party whips to function effectively. This analysis focuses on the key role of the party whips and on their responsibility for the short nine-month life of the first Labour government. I have to declare an interest as a paid up member of the Whips’ Union having acted as Alan Beith’s deputy whip, 1983–86. The importance of the whips in a party system is a neglected field of study.
    [Show full text]
  • Y G ' Fi W L H Ll Yougov's First Welsh Poll: the Results the Results
    YG’fiWlhllYouGov’s first Welsh poll: The results 27. 10. 2009 YouGov Institute of Welsh Politics, Aberystwyth University Wales Governance Centre, Cardiff University Timetable for Seminar 8.00-8.25 ‘Analysis’ RWJ & RS 8.25-8.45 Discussion 8.45-8.50 Short break 8.50-9.00 ‘A brief history of internet polling’ Joe Twyman 9.00-9.20 ‘Internet polling: the state of the art’ Peter Kellner 9.20-9.30 ‘YouGov in Wales’ – Kate Davies 9.30-9.45 Q&A with the YouGov panel 9.45-10.00 Opportunity for informal discussion Part 1: The 1st YouGov Poll in Wales 1. The Po ll 2. The State of the Parties 3. Attitudes to Devolution and a Referendum 4. The Labour Leadership 5. Q & A The Poll •Fieldwor k con ducte d via t he Internet • Fieldwork conducted October 21‐23 • Respondents sampled from YouGov panel • Sample size = 1078; data weighted to be representative of population The State of the Parties Poll asked about: • UK General Election Voting Intention • NAW Election Constituency & Regional Voting Intention General Election Voting Intention % Labour 34 Conservative 31 Lib‐Dems 12 Plaid Cymru 15 Others 7 % Changes From 2005 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% Labour 200%2.00% Plaid 0.00% Cons. -2.00% Lib-Dems -4.00% Others -6.00% -8.00% -10.00% General Election Vote Election Implications, 1 If the swings implied by this poll are applied uniformly across Wales, parties would win following number of MPs (change on 2005)… Labour 20 (‐9) Conservative 12 (+9) Lib‐Dems 2 (‐2) Plaid Cymru 5 (+2) Others 1 Election Implications, 2 Predicted results would be… ‐ Worst Labour vote share in Wales since 1918; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 17/Winter 97/98
    Journal of Liberal Democrat History issue 17 Winter 1997–98 £3.00 Liberals Unite The Origins of Liberal International Scottish Devolution Reports The Grimond Years Religion and the Liberal Party From Beveridge to Blair: Reform of the Young Liberals Welfare State The ‘Red Guard’ Era Reviews Harry Willcock The Liberal Democrats The Forgotten Champion of Liberalism The Strange Death of Liberal England Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 17: Winter 1997–98 The Journal of Liberal Democrat 3 Liberals Unite The Origins Of Liberal International History 1997 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the foundation of The Journal of Liberal Democrat Liberal International. Dr Julie Smith traces the events of History is published quarterly by 1947. the Liberal Democrat History Group. 6 Scottish Devolution: The Grimond Years The History Group promotes the After almost 300 years, Scotland is to have a Parliament discussion and research of historical again. Dr Geoffrey Sell examines the role of Jo Grimond topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Demo- in the story of Scottish devolution. crats, Liberal Party and the SDP. Contributions to the Journal – 10 Report: Religion and the Liberal Party letters, articles, and book reviews – Evening meeting, July 1997, with Alan Beith MP and are invited. Please type them and if Jonathan Parry. Report by Nick South. possible enclose a computer file on disc. Contributions should be sent to the Editor at the address below. 12 Report: From Beveridge to Blair Fringe meeting, September 1997, with Frank Field MP and For more information on the Liberal Democrat History Group, Nick Timmins.
    [Show full text]
  • The Official Report of the Welsh Assembly
    Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru Y Pwyllgor ar Faterion Ewropeaidd ac Allanol The National Assembly for Wales The European and External Affairs Committee Dydd Mercher, 12 Gorffennaf 2006 Wednesday, 12 July 2006 Cynnwys Contents Cyflwyniad, Ymddiheuriadau, Dirprwyon a Datgan Buddiannau Introduction, Apologies, Substitutions and Declarations of Interest Cofnodion y Cyfarfod Blaenorol Minutes of the Previous Meeting Adroddiad y Prif Weinidog First Minister’s Report Addysg UE yn Aelod-wladwriaethau eraill yr Undeb Ewropeaidd EU Education in Other Member States of the European Union Cymru yn y Byd Wales in the World Y Wybodaeth Ddiweddaraf gan Aelodau Pwyllgor y Rhanbarthau Update from Members of the Committee of the Regions Strategaeth Lisbon Lisbon Strategy Cofnodir y trafodion hyn yn yr iaith y llefarwyd hwy ynddi yn y pwyllgor. Yn ogystal, cynhwysir cyfieithiad Saesneg o gyfraniadau yn y Gymraeg. These proceedings are reported in the language in which they were spoken in the committee. In addition, an English translation of Welsh speeches is included. Aelodau o’r Cynulliad yn bresennol: Sandy Mewies (Cadeirydd), Nick Bourne, Rosemary Butler, Jeff Cuthbert, Jane Davidson, Janet Davies, Michael German, Christine Gwyther, Ieuan Wyn Jones, Jonathan Morgan, Rhodri Morgan (y Prif Weinidog), Rhodri Glyn Thomas. Swyddogion yn bresennol: Anna Daniel, Dadansoddwr Polisi’r Undeb Ewropeaidd, Gwasanaethau'r Pwyllgorau ac Ymchwil yr Aelodau; Gary Davies, yr Is-adran Materion Ewropeaidd ac Allanol; Ifona Deeley, yr Is-adran Materion Ewropeaidd ac Allanol; Nia Lewis, Swyddfa Ewrop a Materion Allanol, Swyddfa Brwsel; Neil Thomas, Pennaeth, Is-adran Materion Ewropeaidd ac Allanol. Eraill yn bresennol: Julian Farrel, Yr Adran Masnach a Diwydiant; Anthony Gilmore, y Swyddfa Dramor a Chymanwlad; Andy Klom, Pennaeth Swyddfa’r Comisiwn Ewropeaidd yng Nghymru; Robert Specterman, Trysorlys Ei Mawrhydi; Mike Woolley, Yr Adran Gwaith a Phensiynau.
    [Show full text]