Shed Further Light on the Massacre and the Cover-Up

Copy Link

2005 MIGRANTS MASSACRE FIFTEEN YEARS OF LIES AND COVERUPS Approximately 56 West African Migrants (44 from After reports of the incident emerged, Ghana, 9 from Nigeria, and others from Cote d’Ivoire, both Ghanaian and Gambian authorities Gambia, Senegal and Togo) are arrested in The express regret and agree to conduct a joint July 2005 July Gambia and killed. They had been detained by the 2005 July investigation into the matter. A team from Gambian army, navy, and police forces. both Governments is to investigate the A Ghanaian investigative Martin Kyere of Ghana manages to escape. circumstances, but the Gambian authorities proved unwilling to cooperate. team visits The Gambia to commence a joint probe. After the Gambia refuses, 2005 2006 March 2006 the team visits Senegal 2007 2008 A joint investigative team of the Economic Community of West 2009 African States (ECOWAS) and the United Nations (UN) concludes 2010 that the Gambian government is not “directly or indirectly Six bodies are returned 2011 April 2009 complicit” in the deaths and disappearances, blaming it on “rogue to Ghana, but families are 2012 elements” in Gambia’s security services “acting on their own”. skeptical of their identity. The 2013 Its findings are kept secret. others remain buried across 2014 October 2009 The Gambia and Senegal. 2015 Gambia and Ghana sign a The Ghanaian government announces that it has Memorandum of Understanding “tasked the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the acknowledging that the Gambian 2016 Attorney-General’s Department to study” the case. May 2018 May government was not complicit 2009 July The government of Gambia pledges to cooperate in the killings, but would make with any investigation by Ghana. contributions to the families as a 2017 humanitarian gesture. 2018 A report by Human Rights Watch and TRIAL International shows that the migrants were detained by Yahya Jammeh’s 2019 closest associates in the army, the navy, and the police, and then summarily executed by the Junglers, a paramilitary 2018 May unit operating under Yahya Jammeh’s orders. The Gambian government also had destroyed key evidence before the UN/ECOWAS team arrived. TO THIS DAY, ONLY 6 BODIES HAVE BEEN Five UN human rights monitors request the UN and RETURNED TO GHANA. ECOWAS to release their 2009 report. Its contents Three direct perpetrators of the massacre, MANY DOUBTS REMAIN AS TO THEIR IDENTITY. are still confidential. 2019 January all serving members of the Gambian Armed Forces previously assigned to the Junglers, testify publicly before the Gambia 2019 July Truth, Reconciliation, and Reparations Commission (TRRC) that they and 12 other VICTIMS AND THEIR RELATIVES Junglers carried out the killings on Yahya © TRIAL International / JMB © TRIAL International Jammeh’s orders. 2020 WANT TRUTH AND JUSTICE..

Recommended publications

ICC-ASP/18/25 Assembly of States Parties

International Criminal Court ICC-ASP/18/25 Distr.: General Assembly of States Parties 29 November 2019 Original: English Eighteenth session The Hague, 2-7 December 2019 Report of the Bureau on complementarity I. Background ................................................................................................................. 2 II. General findings .......................................................................................................... 2 III. The President of the Assembly of States Parties, and the Secretariat ......................... 4 IV. The Court .................................................................................................................... 6 V. Broader efforts of the international community .......................................................... 6 VI. Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 9 Annex I: Draft resolution language for the omnibus resolution ................................... 10 Annex II: Draft language for inclusion in the annex on mandates of the omnibus resolution ....................................................................................................... 12 Annex III: Summaries of 2019 meetings ......................................................................... 13 25E291119 ICC-ASP/18/25 I. Background 1. At its 7 February 2019 meeting, the Bureau re-appointed Australia and Romania as ad country focal points for the topic of complementarity. As such, Australia and
Discussion Piece Reflecting on the Recent Implementation of Programmes and Policies Supported by the World Bank in Benin, Camero

COMMUNITY-BASED RESULTS-BASED FINANCING IN HEALTH IN PRACTICE. A discussion piece reflecting on the recent implementation of programmes and policies supported by the World Bank in Benin, Cameroon, the Republic of Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, The Gambia, and Rwanda Jean-Benoît Falisse, Petra Vergeer, Maud Juquois, Alphonse Akpamoli, Jacob Paul Robyn, Walters Shu, Michel Zabiti, Rifat Hasan, Bakary Jallow, Musa Loum, Cédric Ndizeye, Michel Muvudi, Baudouin Makuma Booto Joy Gebre Medhin Executive summary This report discusses Community Results-Based Financing (cRBF), a 'close to client' approach whereby community actors are paid based on the activities they undertake. The focus is on six developing cRBF experiences that have started in Cameroon, The Gambia, Benin, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo), Rwanda, and the Republic of Congo. The report's main aim is to cast light on the success and difficulties encountered in the implementation of such a programme. The report is based on a participative process that included a short review of the existing literature on cRBF, a review of the manuals of procedures and reports produced in each country case, in-depth interviews with a focal point in five countries, and two workshops with practitioners. Do cRBF schemes work? It is too early to say: most schemes are still in their infancy. An impact evaluation of the Rwandan scheme found mixed effects. The Cameroon, Congo, and the Gambia schemes integrate rigorous impact evaluation mechanisms and the first results should be available in two to five years. At this stage, the main discussion is on the implementation of cRBF.
Assessment of ECOWAS Interventions in Guinea Bissau, Burkina Faso and the Gambia

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) |Volume II, Issue IV, April 2018|ISSN 2454-6186 Assessment of ECOWAS Interventions in Guinea Bissau, Burkina Faso and the Gambia Charles Akale1, Kingsley Chigozie Udegbunam2*, Julie Sanda3 1Research Fellow at the Centre for Strategic Research and Studies, National Defense College, Abuja, Nigeria 2Social Sciences Unit, School of General Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria 3Research Fellow at the Centre for Strategic Research and Studies, National Defence College, Abuja, Nigeria *Corresponding author: Kingsley Chigozie Udegbunam he increase in violent hostilities on the African continent ECOWAS MECHANISM FOR CONFLICT PREVENTION, T since the 1990s can be attributed to the withdrawal of MANAGEMENT, RESOLUTION, PEACEKEEPING AND super power strategic interest in Africa following the end of SECURITY the Cold War. The end of the Cold War dramatically The ECOWAS conflict management framework provides for changed the global strategic landscape. Although threat of regional intervention in political crisis in members states. big power and regional conflicts diminished, the security ECOMOG has been adopted as the regional intervention landscape became characterized by political fragmentation. force. Intervention became popular in the 1990s when In the Third World particularly West Africa has experienced ECOWAS deployed ECOMOG forces into Liberia to prevent many conflicts arising from a multiplicity of causes such as the overthrow of the unpopular government of President bad governance among others. The intensity and carnage that Samuel Doe by the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) attended these conflicts, coupled with the inactions of the led by Charles Taylor. ECOMOG intervention can take the “big powers”, reinforced the need for an “African solution” form of peacekeeping or peace enforcement.
Kevin Mgwanga Gunme Et Al / Cameroon Summary of Facts

266/03 : Kevin Mgwanga Gunme et al / Cameroon Summary of Facts 1. The Complainants are 14 individuals who brought the communication on their behalf and on behalf of the people of Southern Cameroon1 against the Republic of Cameroon, a State Party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. 2. The Complain[an]ts allege violations which can be traced to the period shortly after “La Republique du Cameroun” became independent on 1st January 1960. The Complainants state that Southern Cameroon was a United Nations Trust Territory administered by the British, separately from the Francophone part of the Republic of Cameroon, itself a French administered United Nations Trust Territory. Both became UN Trust Territories at the end of the 2nd World War, on 13 December 1946 under the UN Trusteeship System. 3. The Complainants allege that during the 1961 UN plebiscite, Southern Cameroonians were offered “two alternatives” , namely: a choice to join Nigeria or Cameroon. They voted for the later. Subsequently, Southern Cameroon and La République du Cameroun, negotiated and adopted the September 1961 Federal Constitution, at Foumban, leading to the formation of the Federal Republic of Cameroon on 1st October 1961. The Complainants allege further that the UN plebiscite ignored a third alternative, namely the right to independence and statehood for Southern Cameroon. 4. The Complainants allege that the overwhelming majority of Southern Cameroonians preferred independence to the two alternatives offered during the UN plebiscite. They favoured a prolonged period of trusteeship to allow for further evaluation of a third alternative. They allege further that the September 1961 Federal Constitution did not receive the endorsement of the Southern Cameroon House of Assembly.
African Dialects

African Dialects • Adangme (Ghana ) • Afrikaans (Southern Africa ) • Akan: Asante (Ashanti) dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Fante dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Twi (Akwapem) dialect (Ghana ) • Amharic (Amarigna; Amarinya) (Ethiopia ) • Awing (Cameroon ) • Bakuba (Busoong, Kuba, Bushong) (Congo ) • Bambara (Mali; Senegal; Burkina ) • Bamoun (Cameroons ) • Bargu (Bariba) (Benin; Nigeria; Togo ) • Bassa (Gbasa) (Liberia ) • ici-Bemba (Wemba) (Congo; Zambia ) • Berba (Benin ) • Bihari: Mauritian Bhojpuri dialect - Latin Script (Mauritius ) • Bobo (Bwamou) (Burkina ) • Bulu (Boulou) (Cameroons ) • Chirpon-Lete-Anum (Cherepong; Guan) (Ghana ) • Ciokwe (Chokwe) (Angola; Congo ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Mauritian dialect (Mauritius ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Seychelles dialect (Kreol) (Seychelles ) • Dagbani (Dagbane; Dagomba) (Ghana; Togo ) • Diola (Jola) (Upper West Africa ) • Diola (Jola): Fogny (Jóola Fóoñi) dialect (The Gambia; Guinea; Senegal ) • Duala (Douala) (Cameroons ) • Dyula (Jula) (Burkina ) • Efik (Nigeria ) • Ekoi: Ejagham dialect (Cameroons; Nigeria ) • Ewe (Benin; Ghana; Togo ) • Ewe: Ge (Mina) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewe: Watyi (Ouatchi, Waci) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewondo (Cameroons ) • Fang (Equitorial Guinea ) • Fõ (Fon; Dahoméen) (Benin ) • Frafra (Ghana ) • Ful (Fula; Fulani; Fulfulde; Peul; Toucouleur) (West Africa ) • Ful: Torado dialect (Senegal ) • Gã: Accra dialect (Ghana; Togo ) • Gambai (Ngambai; Ngambaye) (Chad ) • olu-Ganda (Luganda) (Uganda ) • Gbaya (Baya) (Central African Republic; Cameroons; Congo ) • Gben (Ben) (Togo
State of Forest Genetic Resources in the Gambia

Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers State of Forest Genetic Resources in The Gambia Prepared for The sub- regional workshop FAO/IPGRI/ICRAF on the conservation, management, sustainable utilization and enhancement of forest genetic resources in Sahelian and North-Sudanian Africa (Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 22-24 September 1998) By Abdoulie A. Danso A co-publication of FAO, IPGRI/SAFORGEN, DFSC and ICRAF December 2001 Danida Forest Seed Centre Forest Resources Division Working Paper FGR/19E FAO, Rome, Italy STATE OF FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES IN THE GAMBIA 2 Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers State of Forest Genetic Resources in The Gambia Prepared for The sub- regional workshop FAO/IPGRI/ICRAF on the conservation, management, sustainable utilization and enhancement of forest genetic resources in Sahelian and North-Sudanian Africa (Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 22-24 September 1998) By Abdoulie A. Danso Forestry Department, The Gambia. A co-publication of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Sub-Saharan Africa Forest Genetic Resources Programme of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI/SAFORGEN) Danida Forest Seed Centre (DFSC) and International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) December 2001 Working papers FGR/19E STATE OF FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES IN THE GAMBIA 3 Disclaimer The current publication « State of the Forest Genetic Resources in The Gambia » is issue of country national report presented at The Sub- Regional Workshop FAO/IPGRI/ICRAF on the conservation, management, sustainable utilization and enhancement of forest genetic resources in Sahelian and North-Sudanian Africa (Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 22-24 September 1998). It is published with the collaboration of FAO, IPGRI/SAFORGEN, DFSC and ICRAF, as one of the country and regional series which deals with the assessment of genetic resources of tree species in the Sahelian and North- Sudanian Africa and identification of priority actions for their Conservation and Sustainable Utilization.
Multi-Faceted Mediation in the Guinea-Bissau Civil War ______

76 MULTI-FACETED MEDIATION IN THE GUINEA-BISSAU CIVIL WAR ___________________________________________ Dr Simon Massey Coventry University (UK) An exchange of gunfire in Bissau city between soldiers loyal to President and mutinous troops supporting the recently dismissed army chief of staff Brigadier Ansumane Mané in the early morning of 7 June 1998 heralded the start of 11 months of civil conflict. ‘It was not a huge war’, the Economist noted, ‘but for the 1m people…of Guinea-Bissau, it was devastating…Hundreds of people were killed, the city was destroyed and hundreds of thousands fled into the countryside’.1 The primary reason for the fighting - irrevocable splits within the government and leading Partido Africano da Independencia da Guiné-Bissau e Cabo Verde (PAIGC) - sat amidst a web of geopolitical machinations and posturing. Guinea-Bissau became the locus for mediation based, for a large part, on political opportunism. These efforts resulted in a peace operation with ostensible humanitarian motives which, nonetheless, was also marked by strong political impulses. As William Zartman has remarked, ‘Africa does not lack mediators’.2 In the case of the war in Bissau the gamut of potential intermediaries – regional, African and extra-African – offered assistance. This confusion of good offices led to rival mediation efforts whose polarisation mirrored that on the battlefield. The background to the conflict What led to civil war? By 1998, Guinea-Bissau had moved far away from the original revolutionary vision of political society articulated by cofounder of the PAIGC Aristides Perreira – ‘the model which our party builds is one in which participation at the base is guaranteed in all decisions, and at every level, by a democratic organisation and method’.3 A disparate population had disengaged from 1 Economist, 15 May 1999, p.48.
An Overview of the Gambia Fisheries Sector

An Overview of The Gambia Fisheries Sector Prepared by: Asberr Natoumbi Mendy Principal Fisheries Officer (Research) August 2009 1. Introduction The Gambia, officially the Republic of The Gambia, is between 13oN and 14oN latitude on the west coast of Africa, bordering the Republic of Senegal and the Atlantic Ocean (Figure 1; The World Factbook, 2008). It is a sub-tropical country in West Africa with a total land area of approximately 10,689 km2, a population of about 1,400,000 people and a population growth rate of 4.2% per annum. The country has a total area of approximately 11,000 square kilometers. Its coastline extends from the mouth of Allahein River (San Pedro River) in the South at 13” 4’ N, to Buniadu Point and Karenti Bolong in the north at 13’31’56”N. The Coast line of the Gambia is about 80 km long, and 25 km of this lies in the bay- shaped mouth of the Gambia River and the rest facing the Atlantic Ocean. It has territorial sea extending to 12 nautical miles with an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of 200 nautical miles from the geographical baseline. The continental shelf area of The Gambia is approximately 4000 square kilometres and an EEZ of nearly 10,500 square kilometres. The fisheries waters of the Republic of The Gambia are characterized by marine waters, brackish waters and freshwater regimes which correspond with the three (3) Fishery Administrative Areas of the country namely: The Atlantic/Marine Coast Stratum, the Lower River Stratum and the Upper River Stratum.
The International Criminal Court, Elite Theory, and African States Withdrawal Notifications

The International Criminal Court, Elite Theory, and African States Withdrawal Notifications: South Africa, The Gambia, and Burundi Theresa Whitely Dr. Ivan Ivanov POL5000 Independent Research Thesis April 30, 2020 Table of Contents_______________________________________________________________ Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1-2 Understanding ICC’s Eroding Authority ............................................................................. 3-11 National Wealth and ICC Membership .................................................................................... 4-6 Democracy ............................................................................................................................... 6-8 ICC Bias Against African Nations ......................................................................................... 8-10 Table 1: Summary of Explanations about States’ Motivations to Withdraw from ICC ..............11 Theory and Methods ............................................................................................................. 11-16 Case Study .............................................................................................................................. 16-26 South Africa ......................................................................................................................... 17-21 The Gambia .........................................................................................................................
And the Gambia Marine Coast and Estuary to Climate Change Induced Effects

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF CENTRAL COASTAL SENEGAL (SALOUM) AND THE GAMBIA MARINE COAST AND ESTUARY TO CLIMATE CHANGE INDUCED EFFECTS Consolidated Report GAMBIA- SENEGAL SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES PROJECT (USAID/BA NAFAA) April 2012 Banjul, The Gambia This publication is available electronically on the Coastal Resources Center’s website at http://www.crc.uri.edu. For more information contact: Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett Bay Campus, South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA. Tel: 401) 874-6224; Fax: 401) 789-4670; Email: [email protected] Citation: Dia Ibrahima, M. (2012). Vulnerability Assessment of Central Coast Senegal (Saloum) and The Gambia Marine Coast and Estuary to Climate Change Induced Effects. Coastal Resources Center and WWF-WAMPO, University of Rhode Island, pp. 40 Disclaimer: This report was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Cooperative Agreement # 624-A-00-09-00033-00. ii Abbreviations CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CIA Central Intelligence Agency CMS Convention on Migratory Species, CSE Centre de Suivi Ecologique DoFish Department of Fisheries DPWM Department Of Parks and Wildlife Management EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone ETP Evapotranspiration FAO United Nations Organization for Food and Agriculture GIS Geographic Information System ICAM II Integrated Coastal and marine Biodiversity management Project IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IUCN International Union for the Conservation of nature NAPA National Adaptation Program of Action NASCOM National Association for Sole Fisheries Co-Management Committee NGO Non-Governmental Organization PA Protected Area PRA Participatory Rapid Appraisal SUCCESS USAID/URI Cooperative Agreement on Sustainable Coastal Communities and Ecosystems UNFCCC Convention on Climate Change URI University of Rhode Island USAID U.S.
A Tangible Commitment to Peace and Security in Africa

The African Peace Facility A tangible commitment to peace and security in Africa www.africa-eu-partnership.org In an increasingly challenging geopolitical environment, achieving stability in Africa and maintaining security in Europe go hand in hand. Under the Africa-EU partnership, the strategic objective on peace and security is not only to ensure a peaceful, safe, secure environment, but also to foster political stability and effective governance, while enabling sustainable and inclusive growth. The African Peace Facility (APF) was created to respond to these strategic objectives and is the EU’s main instrument for implementing the Africa-EU Peace and Security Cooperation. Created in 2004, the APF: Is built on the core principles of Africa-EU partnership, African ownership and support for African solidarity. Has provided more than €2.7 billion to the AU and Regional Economic Communities since its inception. Enables African solutions to African problems: funding is demand driven, with initiatives planned and carried out by African states. A pan-African vehicle in nature, the APF has been a game changer making possible a growing number of African-led responses to political crises on the continent. Through the African Peace Facility, the EU is at the forefront of international support to the African Peace and Security agenda The APF was established in 2004 in response to a request by African The African Peace Facility addresses three inter-linked priorities leaders. Financed through the European Development Fund, it is also: and key objectives: The main source of funding to support the African Union’s and African Regional Enhanced dialogue on challenges to peace and security.
Info Note OPCW Regional Meeting Gambia 2017-29.Pdf

Information Note1 Event: Fifteenth Regional Meeting of National Authorities of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) States Parties in Africa Organizers: The Gambia and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Date and venue: 18-20 July 2017, Banjul, The Gambia Participants: Algeria, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Kenya, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Mozambique, Morocco, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Background • Resolution 1540 (2004) calls on all States (operative paragraph 8) “to promote … full implementation and, where necessary, strengthening of multi-lateral treaties to which they are parties, whose main objective is to prevent the proliferation of nuclear biological or chemical weapons”. Further, the resolution calls upon States to renew and fulfil their commitment to multilateral cooperation, in particular within the framework of… and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons… as an important means of achieving their common objectives in the area of non-proliferation…” • On 29 March 2017, a letter from the Director of the International Cooperation and Assistance Division, OPCW, sent to the Chair, invited a representative of the Group of Experts to participate in a panel discussion and make presentation on achievements, needs and challenges related to terrorism and non-state actors at the regional meetings being co-organised by OPCW with State Parties. The meeting was part of the events to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the entry-into-force of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).