DOCSLIB.ORG

Full List Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full List Here No. English name Scientific Name JBM Mark Mark Mark Mark Total trap trap 1 trap 2 trap 3 trap 4 229 Monopis obviella 1 1 440 Paraswammerdamia albicapitella 1 1 463 Ypsolopha vittella 1 1 518 Coleophora mayrella 2 2 519 Coleophora deauratella 1 1 640 Batia lunaris 2 2 642 Batia unitella 5 5 697 Agonopterix arenella 1 1 726 Metzneria metzneriella 1 1 737 Monochroa palustrella 1 1 787 Bryotropha terrella 3 3 866 Brachmia blandella 2 2 4 873 Blastobasis lignea 1 1 937 Agapeta hamana 3 5 10 18 970 Barred Fruit-tree Tortrix Pandemis cerasana 2 2 972 Dark Fruit-tree Tortrix Pandemis heparana 2 1 3 980 Archips xylosteana 1 1 1010 Red-barred Tortrix Ditula angustiorana 2 2 1011 Pseudargyrotoza conwagana 1 1 1020 Grey Tortrix Cnephasia stephensiana 10 5 15 1030 Eana incanana 1 2 1 1 5 1033 Green Oak Tortrix Tortrix viridana 1 1 1036 Acleris forsskaleana 1 1 2 1063 Celypha striana 1 1 1064 Celypha rosaceana 1 1 1076 Olethreutes lacunana 1 1 1082 Plum Tortrix Hedya pruniana 10 10 1083 Marbled Orchard Tortrix Hedya dimidioalba 1 1 2 1086 Hedya salicella 10 15 20 45 1092 Apotomis turbidana 1 1 1113 Eudemis profundana 5 5 1132 Eponotia subocellana 1 1 1139 Nut Bud Moth Epinotia tenerana 1 1 1165 Zeiraphera isertana 1 1 1167 Gypsonoma aceriana 1 1 1169 Gypsonoma dealbana 10 3 3 16 1175 Bramble Shoot Moth Epiblema uddmanniana 10 10 1 21 1176 Epiblema trimaculana 1 1 1200 Eucosma hohenwartiana 1 1 1201 Eucosma cana 1 1 1205 Bud Moth Spilonota ocellana 1 1 1260 Cydia splendana 3 3 1261 Codling Moth Cydia pomonella 1 1 1293 Chrysoteuchia culmella 200 200 200 200 200 1000 1301 Crambus lathoniellus 1 1 1302 Crambus perlella 1 1 1331 Acentria ephemerella 20 20 1333 Scoparia pyralella 1 1 1334 Scoparia ambigualis 5 5 1344 Eudonia mercurella 1 1 1362 Pyrausta purpuralis 1 1 1376 Small Magpie Eurrhypara hortulata 1 1 1378 Phlyctaenia coronata 2 1 3 1390 Udea prunalis 1 1 1405 Mother of Pearl Pleuroptya ruralis 7 5 12 1415 Orthopygia glaucinalis 1 1 1424 Endrotricha flammealis 20 20 10 50 1436 Acrobasis repandana 5 5 10 1452 Phycita roborella 5 10 15 1481 Homoeosoma sinuella 5 5 1513 White Plume Moth Pterophorus pentadactyla 2 1 3 1637 Oak Eggar Lasiocampa quercus 1 1 2 1640 Drinker Euthrix potatoria 6 6 1651 Chinese Character Cilix glaucata 1 1 1652 Peach Blossom Thyatira batis 1 1 1653 Buff Arches Habrosyne pyritoides 2 2 1666 Large Emerald Geometra papilionaria 1 1 1669 Common Emerald Hemithea aestivaria 2 1 3 1702 Small Fan-footed Wave Idaea biselata 2 2 1708 Single-dotted Wave Idaea dimidiata 1 1 1712 Small Scallop Idaea emarginata 1 1 1713 Riband Wave Idaea aversata 10 1 11 1732 Shaded Broad Bar Ortholitha plumbaria 2 3 5 1738 Common Carpet Epirrhoë alternata 1 1 1758 Barred Straw Eulithis pyraliata 1 1 1791 Brown Scallop Philereme vetulata 1 1 1792 Dark Umber Philereme transversata 1 1 2 1803 Small Rivulet Perizoma alchemillata 1 1 1887 Clouded Border Lomaspilis marginata 2 1 3 1906 Brimstone Moth Opisthograptis luteolata 2 2 1922 Swallowtail Moth Ourapteryx sambucaria 1 1 1931 Peppered Moth Biston betularia 1 1 1941 Mottled Beauty Alcis repandata 3 5 8 1947 The Engrailed Ectropis bistortata 1 1 1955 Common White Wave Cabera pusaria 1 1 1956 Common Wave Cabera exanthemata 1 1 1958 Clouded Silver Lomographa temerata 1 1 2 1961 Light Emerald Campaea margaritata 1 1 1991 Large Elephant Hawk-moth Deilephila elpenor 2 2 1 5 1994 Buff-tip Phalera bucephala 1 1 2033 Black Arches Lymantria monacha 1 1 2044 Dingy Footman Eilema griseola 3 3 2047 Scarce Footman Eilema complana 25 25 50 2050 Common Footman Eilema lurideola 20 10 5 5 40 2064 Ruby Tiger Phragmatobia fuliginosa 1 1 2088 Heart & Club Agrotis clavis 5 5 2089 Heart & Dart Agrotis exclamationis 5 2 7 2098 The Flame Axylia putris 1 1 2102 Flame-Shoulder Ochropleura plecta 1 2 3 2107 Large Yellow Underwing Noctua pronuba 2 3 5 2109 Lesser Yellow Underwing Noctua comes 1 1 2110 Broad-bordered Yellow Underwing Noctua fimbriata 10 10 20 2126 Setaceous Hebrew Character Xestia c-nigrum 2 2 2128 Double Square-spot Xestia triangulum 2 2 4 2192 Brown-line Bright-eye Mythimna conigera 3 1 4 2193 The Clay Mythimna impura 3 2 5 2194 White-point Mythimna albipuncta 1 1 2198 Smoky Wainscot Mythimna ferrago 10 10 20 10 20 70 2205 Shoulder-striped Wainscot Mythimna comma 1 1 2278 Poplar Grey Acronicta megachephala 1 1 2 2280 The Miller Acronicta leporina 1 1 2283/4 Grey?Dark Dagger ?Acronicta tridens/psi 1 1 2291 Coronet Craniophora ligustri 2 2 4 2314 Dingy Shears Parastichtis ypsillon 1 1 2316 Lesser-Spotted Pinion Cosmia affinis 3 3 2318 The Dun-bar Cosmia trapezina 30 30 30 30 120 2319 Lunar-spotted Pinion Cosmia pyralina 1 1 2 2321 Dark Arches Apamea monoglypha 3 10 13 2322 Light Arches Apamea lithoxylaea 1 1 2337/9 ?Marbled Minor agg. ?Oligia strigilis ? 1 1 2341 Cloaked Minor Mesoligia furuncula 5 5 2343a ?Lesser Common Rustic Mesapamea didyma 1 1 2381 The Uncertain Hoplodrina alsines 3 3 2382 The Rustic Hoplodrina blanda 2 5 7 2423 Oak Nycteoline Nycteola revayana 1 1 2434 Burnished Brass Diachrysia chrysitis 2 2 2442 Beautiful Golden Y Autographa pulchrina 1 1 2473 Beautiful Hook-tip Laspeyria flexula 1 1 2474 Straw Dot Rivula sericealis 1 1 2477 The Snout Hypena proboscidalis 2 2 (Meadow Brown) Nightly Total Moths 341 353 376 369 347 1786 Nightly Total species 27 31 42 38 52 130. Nightly Total macros 29 97 116 116 108 466 Nightly Total micros 312 256 260 253 239 1320 Total macro species 7 16 22 25 32 69 Total micro species 20 15 20 13 20 61.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Study of the Characteristics of the Appearances of Lepidoptera Larvae and Foodplants at Mt
    JOURNAL OF Research Paper ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT http://www.jecoenv.org J. Ecol. Environ. 36(4): 245-254, 2013 A Study of the Characteristics of the Appearances of Lepidoptera Larvae and Foodplants at Mt. Gyeryong National Park in Korea Yong-Gu Han, Sang-Ho Nam, Youngjin Kim, Min-Joo Choi and Youngho Cho* Department of Biology, College of Natural Science, Daejeon University, Daejeon 300-716, Korea Abstract This research was conducted over a time span of three years, from 2009 to 2011. Twenty-one surveys in total, seven times per year, were done between April and June of each year on major trees on trails around Donghaksa and Gapsa in Mt. Gyeryong National Park in order to identify foodplants of the Lepidoptera larvae and their characteristic appearances. During the survey of Lepidoptera larvae in trees along trails around Donghaksa and Gapsa, 377 individuals and 21 spe- cies in 8 families were identified. The 21 species wereAlcis angulifera, Cosmia affinis, Libythea celtis, Adoxophyes orana, Amphipyra monolitha, Acrodontis fumosa, Xylena formosa, Ptycholoma lecheana circumclusana, Choristoneura adum- bratana, Archips capsigeranus, Pandemis cinnamomeana, Rhopobota latipennis, Apochima juglansiaria, Cifuna locuples, Lymantria dispar, Eilema deplana, Rhodinia fugax, Acronicta rumicis, Amphipyra erebina, Favonius saphirinus, and Dra- vira ulupi. Twenty-one Lepidoptera insect species were identified in 21 species of trees, including Zelkova serrata. Among them, A. angulifera, C. affinis, and L. celtis were found to have the widest range of foodplants. Additionally, it was found that many species of Lepidoptera insects can utilize more species as foodplants according to the chemical substances in the plants and environments in addition to the foodplants noted in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    732 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 7, No. 2, June 2012__________ STRUCTURE OF LEPIDOPTEROCENOSES ON OAKS QUERCUS DALECHAMPII AND Q. CERRIS IN CENTRAL EUROPE AND ESTIMATION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT SPECIES Miroslav Kulfan* * Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina B-1, SK-84215 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. E-mail: [email protected] [Kulfan, M. 2012. Structure of lepidopterocenoses on oaks Quercus dalechampii and Q. cerris in Central Europe and estimation of the most important species. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 7 (2): 732-741] ABSTRACT: On the basis of lepidopterous larvae a total of 96 species on Quercus dalechampii and 58 species on Q. cerris were recorded in 10 study plots of Malé Karpaty and Trnavská pahorkatina hills. The families Geometridae, Noctuidae and Tortricidae encompassed the highest number of found species. The most recorded species belonged to the trophic group of generalists. On the basis of total abundance of lepidopterous larvae found on Q. dalechampii from all the study plots the most abundant species was evidently Operophtera brumata. The most abundant species on Q. cerris was Cyclophora ruficiliaria. Based on estimated oak leaf area consumed by a larva it is shown that Lymantria dispar was the most important leaf-chewing species of both Q. dalechampii and Q. cerris. KEY WORDS: Slovakia, Quercus dalechampii, Q. cerris, the most important species. About 300 Lepidoptera species are known to damage the assimilation tissue of oaks in Central Europe (Patočka, 1954, 1980; Patočka et al.1999; Reiprich, 2001). Lepidoptera larvae are shown to be the most important group of oak defoliators (Patočka et al., 1962, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Xyleninae 73.087 2385 Small Mottled Willow
    Xyleninae 73.087 2385 Small Mottled Willow (Spodoptera exigua) 73.089 2386 Mediterranean Brocade (Spodoptera littoralis) 73.091 2396 Rosy Marbled (Elaphria venustula) 73.092 2387 Mottled Rustic (Caradrina morpheus) 73.093 2387a Clancy's Rustic (Caradrina kadenii) 73.095 2389 Pale Mottled Willow (Caradrina clavipalpis) 73.096 2381 Uncertain (Hoplodrina octogenaria) 73.0961 2381x Uncertain/Rustic agg. (Hoplodrina octogenaria/blanda) 73.097 2382 Rustic (Hoplodrina blanda) 73.099 2384 Vine's Rustic (Hoplodrina ambigua) 73.100 2391 Silky Wainscot (Chilodes maritima) 73.101 2380 Treble Lines (Charanyca trigrammica) 73.102 2302 Brown Rustic (Rusina ferruginea) 73.103 2392 Marsh Moth (Athetis pallustris) 73.104 2392a Porter's Rustic (Athetis hospes) 73.105 2301 Bird's Wing (Dypterygia scabriuscula) 73.106 2304 Orache Moth (Trachea atriplicis) 73.107 2300 Old Lady (Mormo maura) 73.109 2303 Straw Underwing (Thalpophila matura) 73.111 2097 Purple Cloud (Actinotia polyodon) 73.113 2306 Angle Shades (Phlogophora meticulosa) 73.114 2305 Small Angle Shades (Euplexia lucipara) 73.118 2367 Haworth's Minor (Celaena haworthii) 73.119 2368 Crescent (Helotropha leucostigma) 73.120 2352 Dusky Sallow (Eremobia ochroleuca) 73.121 2364 Frosted Orange (Gortyna flavago) 73.123 2361 Rosy Rustic (Hydraecia micacea) 73.124 2362 Butterbur (Hydraecia petasitis) 73.126 2358 Saltern Ear (Amphipoea fucosa) 73.127 2357 Large Ear (Amphipoea lucens) 73.128 2360 Ear Moth (Amphipoea oculea) 73.1281 2360x Ear Moth agg. (Amphipoea oculea agg.) 73.131 2353 Flounced Rustic (Luperina
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuid Moth (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) Communities in Urban Parks of Warsaw
    POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES • INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA MEMORABILIA ZOOL. 42 125-148 1986 GRAŻYNA WINIARSKA NOCTUID MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) COMMUNITIES IN URBAN PARKS OF WARSAW ABSTRACT A total of 40 noctuid moth species were recorded in four parks of Warsaw. Respective moth communities consisted of a similar number of species (17—25), but differed in their abundance index (3.5 —7.9). In all the parks, the dominant species were Autographa gamma and Discrestra trifolii. The subdominant species were represented by Acronicta psi, Trachea atriplicis, Mamestra suasa, Mythimna pallens, and Catocala nupta. There were differences in the species composition and dominance structure among noctuid moth communities in urban parks, suburban linden- oak-hornbeam forest, and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forest. In the suburban and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forests, the number of species was higher by 40% and their abundance wao 5 — 9 times higher than in the urban parks. The species predominating in parks occurred in very low numbers in suburban and natural habitats. Only T. atriplicis belonged to the group of most abundant species in all the habitats under study. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the interest of ecologists in urban habitats has been increasing as they proved to be rich in plant and animal species. The vegetation of urban green areas is sufficiently well known since its species composition and spatial structure are shaped by gardening treatment. But the fauna of these areas is poorly known, and regular zoological investigations in urban green areas were started not so long ago, when urban green was recognized as one of the most important factors of the urban “natural” habitat (Ciborowski 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And
    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) of the Czech Republic
    © Entomologica Fennica. 30 March 2009 Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Republic Jaromir Vafihara*, Hans-Peter Tschorsnig, Benno Herting’r, Petr Mfickstein & Veronika Michalkova J P. & V. Vanhara, ., Tschorsnig, H.-P., Herting, B., Miickstein, Michalkova, 2009: Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Re- public. — Entomol. Fennica 20: 22—48. An annotated host catalogue is given for the Tachinidae ofthe Czech Republic. It comprises 149 of476 tachinid species which are currently known from this coun- try (included the two new records cited below). 195 hosts are listed. The first host records ofTachinidae date back to the second halfofthe 19th century. The bibli- ography for the host records consists of 1 16 papers of 55 researchers. Several re- cords of hitherto unpublished material are included. Phryxe setifacies and Anthomyiopsis plagioderae are first records for the Czech Republic. J. Vanhara (*corresponding author), Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] H.—P. Tschorsnig, Staatliches Museumflir Naturkunde, Rosenstein I, D— 70 191 Stuttgart, Germany, tschorsnig.smns@naturkundemuseum—bw.de P. Muckstein Administration of the Protected Landscape Area Zd’drske' vrchy, Brnenska 39, CZ—591 01 Zd’dr nad Sazavou, Czech Republic, muchstein @email.cz V. Michalkova, Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] Received 22 August 200 7, accepted 21 January 2008 1. Introduction The tachinid species are listed in their actual valid nomenclature; probable misidentifications Tachinidae are a very large and important dipter- are — if possible — tentatively corrected, but the an family of (mainly) insect parasitoids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation
    M DC, — _ CO ^. E CO iliSNrNVINOSHilWS' S3ldVyan~LIBRARlES*"SMITHS0N!AN~lNSTITUTl0N N' oCO z to Z (/>*Z COZ ^RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniIiSNI_NVINOSHllWS S3ldVaan_L: iiiSNi'^NviNOSHiiNS S3iavyan libraries Smithsonian institution N( — > Z r- 2 r" Z 2to LI ^R I ES^'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTlON'"NOIini!iSNI~NVINOSHilVMS' S3 I b VM 8 11 w </» z z z n g ^^ liiiSNi NviNOSHims S3iyvyan libraries Smithsonian institution N' 2><^ =: to =: t/J t/i </> Z _J Z -I ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS SSIdVyan L — — </> — to >'. ± CO uiiSNi NViNosHiiws S3iyvaan libraries Smithsonian institution n CO <fi Z "ZL ~,f. 2 .V ^ oCO 0r Vo^^c>/ - -^^r- - 2 ^ > ^^^^— i ^ > CO z to * z to * z ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNl NVINOSHllWS S3iaVdan L to 2 ^ '^ ^ z "^ O v.- - NiOmst^liS^> Q Z * -J Z I ID DAD I re CH^ITUCnMIAM IMOTtTIITinM / c. — t" — (/) \ Z fj. Nl NVINOSHIIINS S3 I M Vd I 8 H L B R AR I ES, SMITHSONlAN~INSTITUTION NOIlfl :S^SMITHS0NIAN_ INSTITUTION N0liniliSNI__NIVIN0SHillMs'^S3 I 8 VM 8 nf LI B R, ^Jl"!NVINOSHimS^S3iavyan"'LIBRARIES^SMITHS0NIAN~'lNSTITUTI0N^NOIin L '~^' ^ [I ^ d 2 OJ .^ . ° /<SS^ CD /<dSi^ 2 .^^^. ro /l^2l^!^ 2 /<^ > ^'^^ ^ ..... ^ - m x^^osvAVix ^' m S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — NOIlfliliSNrNVINOSHimS^SS iyvyan~LIBR/ S "^ ^ ^ c/> z 2 O _ Xto Iz JI_NVIN0SH1I1/MS^S3 I a Vd a n^LI B RAR I ES'^SMITHSONIAN JNSTITUTION "^NOlin Z -I 2 _j 2 _j S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVaan LI BR/ 2: r- — 2 r- z NVINOSHiltNS ^1 S3 I MVy I 8 n~L B R AR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN'iNSTITUTIOn'^ NOlin ^^^>^ CO z w • z i ^^ > ^ s smithsonian_institution NoiiniiiSNi to NviNosHiiws'^ss I dVH a n^Li br; <n / .* -5^ \^A DO « ^\t PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Moth Fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a Wetland Forest: a Case Study from Motovun Forest, Istria, Croatia
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 399–414, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2945 ISSN 0031-5362 original research article Diversity of the moth fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a wetland forest: A case study from Motovun forest, Istria, Croatia Abstract TONI KOREN1 KAJA VUKOTIĆ2 Background and Purpose: The Motovun forest located in the Mirna MITJA ČRNE3 river valley, central Istria, Croatia is one of the last lowland floodplain 1 Croatian Herpetological Society – Hyla, forests remaining in the Mediterranean area. Lipovac I. n. 7, 10000 Zagreb Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014 lepidopterological 2 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, research was carried out on 14 sampling sites in the area of Motovun forest. Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia The moth fauna was surveyed using standard light traps tents. 3 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, Results and Conclusions: Altogether 403 moth species were recorded Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia in the area, of which 65 can be considered at least partially hygrophilous. These results list the Motovun forest as one of the best surveyed regions in Correspondence: Toni Koren Croatia in respect of the moth fauna. The current study is the first of its kind [email protected] for the area and an important contribution to the knowledge of moth fauna of the Istria region, and also for Croatia in general. Key words: floodplain forest, wetland moth species INTRODUCTION uring the past 150 years, over 300 papers concerning the moths Dand butterflies of Croatia have been published (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Cumbrian Lepidoptera (2000)
    A Checklist of the Butterflies and larger Moths of Cumbria Edited by Bill Kydd and Stephen Hewitt A Checklist of the Butterflies and larger Moths of Cumbria Edited by Bill Kydd and Stephen Hewitt February 2000 Tullie House Museum and Art Gallery Castle Street Carlisle © Carlisle City Council 2000 The Cumbria Biological Records Database at Tullie House Museum Tullie House Museum maintains a database of wildlife sightings from across the county of Cumbria. Some 140,000 records from Cumbria are stored on computer, backed up by large collections of voucher and reference specimens. The Museum aims to record and monitor the status of wildlife in Cumbria. The information is used to increase the knowledge of the wildlife of the county and to inform decisions affecting the wildlife and countryside of Cumbria. Tullie House welcomes information and records concerning the wildlife of Cumbria. Provisional distribution atlases are available for the following groups: Mammals in Cumbria 1999 Butterflies in Cumbria 2000 Dragonflies in Cumbria 1994 Grasshoppers and Crickets in Cumbria 1993 Ladybirds in Cumbria 1998 Reptiles in Cumbria 1992 Amphibians in Cumbria 1995 Please send your wildlife sightings to the Keeper of Natural Sciences, Tullie House Museum, Castle Street, Carlisle CA3 8TP. Tel: 01228 534781 ext. 248. Fax: 01228 810249. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction The purpose of this checklist is to assist local moth recorders in assessing their own records and captures. We hope that it will enable recorders to identify unusual and important records as they occur and further stimulate the study of moths in Cumbria. Bill Kydd acted as County Lepidoptera Recorder for Cumbria Naturalists’ Union from 1979 to 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on APPLES – Fruit Pathway and Alert List
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 5 - REPORT on APPLES – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Wistermann A, Steffen K, Grousset F, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/107o25ccc1b2c DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background on apple .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Data on production and trade of apple fruit ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Pathway ‘apple fruit’ .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Does a Minimal Intervention Approach Threaten the Biodiversity Of
    Forest Ecology and Management 358 (2015) 80–89 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Does a minimal intervention approach threaten the biodiversity of protected areas? A multi-taxa short-term response to intervention in temperate oak-dominated forests ⇑ Pavel Sebek a,b, , Radek Bace c, Michael Bartos b,d, Jiri Benes a, Zuzana Chlumska b,d, Jiri Dolezal b,d, Miroslav Dvorsky b,d, Jakub Kovar e, Ondrej Machac e, Blanka Mikatova f, Michal Perlik a,b, Michal Platek a,b, Simona Polakova a,g, Martin Skorpik h, Robert Stejskal h, Miroslav Svoboda c, Filip Trnka e, Mojmir Vlasin i, Michal Zapletal a,b, Lukas Cizek a,b a Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre CAS, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic b Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic c Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic d Institute of Botany CAS, Pruhonice, Czech Republic e Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic f Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic g Beleco, Prague, Czech Republic h Podyji National Park Administration, Znojmo, Czech Republic i Veronica, Brno, Czech Republic article info abstract Article history: Efficient conservation management must be applied in protected areas in order to slow the loss of biodi- Received 14 July 2015 versity in Europe. Regarding forests, a conservation approach based on minimal intervention prevails in Received in revised form 27 August 2015 most protected woodlands, thus facilitating the expansion of closed-canopy forests at the expense of Accepted 3 September 2015 open forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Planting of Disease-Resistant Elm Cultivars for Lepidoptera and the Biosecurity Implications
    Planting of Disease-resistant Elm Cultivars for Lepidoptera and the Biosecurity Implications Policy Summary Butterfly Conservation supports the planting of disease-resistant elm (DRE) under specific circumstances and when strict biosecurity measures are implemented, as part of a wider strategy to conserve native and naturalised elm. Butterfly Conservation will preferentially use UK sourced and grown trees and would support nurseries to propagate native, naturalised and DREs within the UK. Biosecurity is the primary consideration when procuring trees. Conserving and enhancing native and naturalised elm in rural and urban areas should be an integral part of any elm management strategy. Areas that are considered suitable and unsuitable for native, naturalised and DRE planting are listed in Table 1. Plant native and naturalised elm derived from local provenance as part of the elm species mix if there is no natural seed source or if native and naturalised elm is not present in a range of different age classes. Planting DREs should be undertaken only where locally appropriate whilst meeting strict biosecurity measures. DRE planting sites should be chosen strategically to provide connectivity between colonies and act as refuges, should Dutch Elm Disease (DED) occur, for Section 41 and Section 7 species of Lepidoptera such as the White-letter Hairstreak Satyrium w-album and White-spotted Pinion Cosmia affinis (NERC, 2006; Environmental (Wales) Act 2016). Planted elms should be monitored for breeding White-letter Hairstreak and White-spotted Pinion if within or near the species current distribution (Appendix 1-2). Background Information The outbreak of DED in the UK during the 1970s led to the loss of mature elms throughout the UK.
    [Show full text]