A Glossary of Terms Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance

A GLOSSARY OF TERMS WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Accessibility Task Force (ATF) A subgroup of the Web Standards Project (WaSP) focusing on accessibility, assistive technology, and standards support.

ADA See Americans with Disabilities Act.

Ajax A combination of technologies that allows bits of a web page to be refreshed from the server without refreshing the whole page, which gives the user a more responsive, seam- less experience. It is a good buzzword, but a lousy acronym for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML (because it doesn’t require XML). Ajax currently is most often seen in Google Maps, Google’s Gmail, and the like. Many accessibility problems have yet to be addressed. A similar result, without using JavaScript, may be achieved using Flash or even HTML frames.

alt-text A generic term describing descriptive text attached to certain objects on a web page that can be read aloud by a screen reader, so that a person with a visual impairment can know the nature of such objects, too. Alt-text is therefore an accessible alternative to a poten- tially inaccessible item of content. For example, the object element may use text embedded within it as a fallback mechanism.

The most common alternative text is found as an attribute of the element, and it describes the function of an image, or is blank in the case of purely decorative images.

It is evil and wrong to refer to this as an alt tag (there is no alt element in (X)HTML), and many hope that WCAG 3.0 will mandate the death penalty for such incorrect nomenclature.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) A U.S. law passed in 1990 that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities.

applet A Java program or application that provides interactivity not offered by (X)HTML and designed to be embedded in, and invoked from, a web page. In many cases, Flash has superseded applets as the means to achieve extra interactivity.

assistive technology Equipment or software that assists people with disabilities in performing everyday activi- ties. Examples include screen readers and voice-input software.

ATAG See Authoring Tools Accessibility Guidelines.

ATF See Accessibility Task Force.

582 GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Authoring Tools Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) Published by the W3C in 2000 to assist authoring tool developers in “designing authoring tools that produce accessible Web content and to assist developers in creating an accessible authoring interface” (www.w3.org/TR/ATAG10/). In other words, your blogging tool or CMS should not only produce accessible pages, but also be accessible itself so that users with disabilities can create content.

B A baseline In WCAG 2.0, a set of technologies assumed to be supported by, and enabled in, user agents in order for web content to conform to WCAG 2.0. Some examples of entities that may set baselines include authors, companies, customers, and government entities.

Bobby A free website accessibility assessment tool developed by CAST (www.cast.org/), and then acquired by Watchfire (www.watchfire.com/). The free version of Bobby was discontinued in April 2003.

Bobby had some utility in checking for things like missing alt-text, but, unfortunately, it lulled site owners into a false sense of security, as they believed that “passing Bobby” guar- anteed accessibility. There are many other online “validators,” such as Cynthia Says and the WAVE. Gez Lemon has a salutary article about the usefulness of such programs at http:// juicystudio.com/article/invalid-content-accessibility-validators.php. browser The software on a computer that allows websites to be rendered so they can be displayed to users. There are two types of visual browsers. Internet Explorer, Firefox, Opera, Safari, and the like render all content including the latest technologies. Others, like Lynx, are text- only. But many other types of browsers exist, some of which produce voice output, such as IBM Home Page Reader.

Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) A means of applying styling/formatting to markup (for example, XML or HTML). This has many advantages over using HTML formatting tags, such as and . For a start, CSS formatting is more powerful and allows more flexibility. If you want to change a style, you need only change its definition in the style sheet, rather than changing every instance of it in the HTML. CSS has great uses for accessibility. For example, you can use an alternative style sheet to make the text on a website bigger for the benefit of people with visual impairments. See Chapter 9 of this book for more details.

CMS See content management system.

583 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

content management system (CMS) A program that allows users to create and manage web pages and other content. CMSs are often browser-based. They can range from free blogging tools, such as WordPress, to expensive systems that can run a whole enterprise site, such as TeamSite or Vignette. They are generally template-driven and promise (with varying success) to turn user’s text-based input into HTML. Many spit out horribly inaccessible code, and most do not conform to ATAG and are therefore unable to be used by people with disabilities to produce sites. It’s always important to ask vendors about their conformance to ATAG before purchasing a CMS.

CSS See Cascading Style Sheets.

DDA See Disability Discrimination Act.

design for all See universal design.

Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) A name shared by two laws passed in Australia (1992) and the United Kingdom (1995, extended 2005). They both prohibit discrimination against people with disabilities.

D-LINK A link that takes the form of a capital D near an image. It provides a longer description of the image or its purpose than is feasible using the alt attribute. It’s basically a hack, because most browsers don’t cope with longdesc well.

Document Object Model (DOM) A view of a document (HTML, XHTML, or XML) that can be parsed and manipulated to add new content, amend styles, and change behavior after a web page has loaded—generally via JavaScript, as this is built into most browsers. See Chapter 10 of this book for more details.

Document Type Definition (DTD) A file that defines the relationships and constraints for elements and attributes used in the markup language in the form of a schema. For example, a DTD may define whether an attribute is required for a particular element. Effectively, it’s the grammatical rules for the language.

DOM See Document Object Model.

584 GLOSSARY OF TERMS

DTD See Document Type Definition. dyslexia A language-based learning disability that is often characterized by difficulties with understanding written language and being more attuned to a graphical or an object-based learning style.

E A

ECMAScript The standardized version of JavaScript (JScript in Internet Explorer) that can be used effectively to manipulate the DOM, validate forms, and control Ajax, or uselessly to produce effects such as pictures of unicorns following the mouse pointer. ActionScript (found in Adobe’s Flash) is also a flavor of ECMAScript (and is equally good with unicorns).

Extensible Hypertext Markup Language (XHTML) Defined by the W3C as “a reformulation of the three HTML 4 document types as applications of XML 1.0. It is intended to be used as a language for content that is both XML- conforming and, if some simple guidelines are followed, operates in HTML 4 conforming user agents” (www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#xhtml).

XHTML is very much like HTML with a few extra rules. There are three main flavors. XHTML 1.0 Transitional allows many deprecated tags, and as the name suggests, was designed to help developers make the transition from HTML. XHTML 1.0 Frameset allows frames and therefore has attendant accessibility issues. XHTML 1.0 Strict is, well, strict (when compared with traditional HTML).

The idea that XHTML is “better” than HTML is subject to ferocious (but rather futile) debate, as it is largely a matter of personal preference, understanding the difference, and using the right tools for the job.

Extensible Markup Language (XML) A language specification from the W3C that allows users to develop their own markup languages (often called vocabularies), and format their documents using style sheets to be presented on a browser if desired. XML has a very strict set of rules that must be adhered to, allowing a lot of control over document format. XML is most useful, however, as a com- pletely language/platform-agnostic data format.

Extensible Stylesheet Language (XSL) A W3C specification that contains three parts: Extensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for changing the formatting and structure of markup according to a set of rules, Extensible Stylesheet Language Formatting Objects (XSL-FO) for applying a strong set of rules to a document to ensure reliable formatting when printed, and XPath to select the elements required by XSLT.

585 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Firefox An open source browser available for all main operating systems, developed by the Mozilla Corporation. The good (but not perfect) standards support and availability of community- written extensions makes it the browser of choice for many web developers.

Flash The name given to the product by Adobe (formerly Macromedia) that allows moving graphics to be displayed in a web page. It refers to the Flash Player, which plugs in to the browser, as well as (more generally) the program and effects. Flash can be made accessible on Windows machines via MSAA, and some of the most widespread screen readers can access the content. Although Flash has gotten bad press from some accessibility advocates, it has proved very helpful in delivering accessible content to people with cognitive disabilities.

FLEX A product from Adobe (formerly Macromedia) that allows a developer to create a rich, interactive web page that can update with the server in real time, with Ajax-like results.

frames A feature of (X)HTML that allows a web author to divide a page into two or more separate windows. If the frame does not have a element, or the <title> element is not meaningful, this can cause accessibility issues. In addition, some browsers do not support frames.HHTML See Hypertext Markup Language.Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) The markup language that is used to create the vast majority of web pages. The standards for HTML are controlled by the W3C.I image map An area of an image on a web page that has links to other areas of the Web. For example, an image map could take the form of a map of Europe, in which clicking the map of England could open a page about warm beer, rain, and world-renowned cuisine; whereas the area corresponding to Belgium takes you to a page about great beer and a list of household names from all fields of human endeavor.586 GLOSSARY OF TERMSThere are two types of image maps: client-side and server-side. In Chapter 7 of this book, you will read “If you want to use an image map, make it a client-side image map.” A List Apart has a good article on building an accessible, standards-compliant image map at www.alistapart.com/articles/imagemap.J Java A An object-oriented programming language developed by Sun Microsystems. Java was specifically designed for the distributed environment of the Web and can be used to create applications that can run on a single computer or distributed among several com- puters in a network. It can also be used to write applets (small, stand-alone programs) or animations, although Flash is more commonly used for these.JavaScript A scripting language often used on web pages. It’s a type of ECMAScript. See Chapter 10 for a discussion of JavaScript and accessibility.JScript The Microsoft variant of JavaScript found in Internet Explorer web browsers.L linearization The process of removing the cellular structure from a layout table and checking the cells’ contents in their linear (source) order, left to right, top to bottom. Linearization takes the contents of row 1 column 1, then row 1 column 2, and so on. If any cells contain a nested table, all of those cells are linearized before proceeding to the next cell of the original table. The Lynx browser or Web Developer plug-in for Firefox is a good way to see the linearized structure. See Chapter 6 for a full discussion of how table linearization works.The purpose of linearization is to see if the content still makes sense, as the linearized order is the order in which a screen reader will voice the web page to the user. If it does still make sense (and it generally does), both WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 say your layout is accessible. But no one has professionally used tables to lay out web pages since Mozart fell off his penny-farthing during a stegosaurus hunt.Lynx A text-only browser that was popular among UNIX users and sometimes used by people with disabilities and those in low-bandwidth areas. Lynx can be downloaded from http:// lynx.isc.org/release/. A Lynx emulator is also available at www.delorie.com/web/ lynxview.html, and it useful for testing how tables linearize.587 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEMMicrosoft Active Accessibility (MSAA) A layer in all modern Windows systems that allows assistive technologies to hook into applications. It is how screen readers “know” what is on the screen.MSAA See Microsoft Active Accessibility. multimedia Using a computer to present multiple types of media simultaneously, in an integrated manner. Media can include sound, graphics, video, text, animation, or any other form of information representation. For the purposes of WCAG 2.0, multimedia refers to combined audio and video presentations, as well as audio-only and video-only presentations that include interaction.O on-screen keyboard A keyboard that appears on the screen. Users who cannot use their hands can use assistive technology (such as a head pointer) to enter keyboard input via the on-screen keyboard. outcome-based In WCAG 2.0, refers to the determination of the application of a process. What were the results of the application of a specific guideline? Were the success criteria achieved?PPAS 78 The Publicly Available Specification from the British Standards Institution (BSI), titled “Guide to Good Practice in Commissioning Accessible Websites,” released in March 2006. See Appendix C of this book for more details.PDF See Portable Document Format. plug-in A module (either hardware or software) that adds a special feature to a larger system or program; for example, a program to play movies on a browser or the plug-in that allows browsers to display Flash content.588 GLOSSARY OF TERMSPortable Document Format (PDF) Developed by Adobe Systems Inc. as a way to publish documents electronically, with good formatting for printing and document security (documents are generally read-only). Originally, it was in an image format, and this presented major accessibility issues. Recently, however, Adobe has made large strides in making the PDF format accessible to people with disabilities, although it’s generally more complex to navigate a PDF file or to make a PDF file accessible than doing so with an equivalent HTML document. See Chapter 12 of this book for details on PDF accessibility. programmatically determined A In WCAG 2.0, means something can be recognized by user agents, including assistive technologies, that support the technologies in the chosen baseline. For our purposes, it seems to mean marking up documents semantically, so a program (like a JavaScript favelet, screen reader, or search bot) can tell what’s a list, what’s a heading, and so on, without having to rely on context.R refreshable Braille display An assistive device that turns information into raised Braille characters electromechani- cally, by raising small pins up through holes in a plate, which can be sensed by users placing their fingers on the plate.SScalable Vector Graphics (SVG) A language for vector graphics coded in XML. XML documents can have these graphics placed directly into the document, with many advantages. SVG produces graphics that are smaller, transmit more quickly, are scalable without loss of resolution, can have searchable text labels, and can be interactive. SVG is being developed by the W3C. scope In WCAG 2.0, refers to limiting conformance claims to pertain to only some parts of a website. Scoping allows authors to claim conformance to WCAG 2.0 for all URLs in one part of a site and exclude other parts of the site. “Scoping cannot exclude a particular type of content (for example, images or scripts) since it would allow exclusion of individual success criteria” (www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/conformance.html#conformance-reqs). screen magnifier A device (or software) that will make images and text on a screen larger for the benefit of visually impaired users. Many Microsoft Windows machines have a simple screen magnifier built in (available from the Start ➤ Programs ➤ Accessories ➤ Accessibility menu).589 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE screen reader A computer program that reads the screen to a user. It can be used to surf the Web, to write a spreadsheet or document, or just to read pages. It is closely related to voice output. In many ways, screen reader is a misnomer; most modern screen readers actually read the text in source-code order, regardless of the positions of the various elements in the visual layout. Examples of screen readers are JAWS for Windows, Window-Eyes, and VoiceOver on Mac OS X version 10.4.Section 508 A common name for Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. This is an amendment to a U.S. law that basically says all electronic and information technology purchased or developed by the U.S. government must be accessible to people with disabilities. See Appendix B for details.SMIL See Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language. spacer image Small, transparent image placed on a page, usually in a table-based layout, also called spacer GIF. Spacer images are an old-fashioned way to position text and images on the page for a good visual effect. These should be found only in legacy pages, and should have null alt-text (alt=""). style guide A document that sets out the rules for your website. All your developers must follow your style guide, and the webmaster should enforce it. Accessibility rules and standards can be included in this style guide. This is a good idea, as when a style guide is implemented, accessibility becomes part of the basic parameters for your website and becomes much less of an issue. style sheet See Cascading Style Sheets and Extensible Stylesheet Language. success criteria In WCAG 2.0, testable statements that will be either true or false when applied to specific web content (see www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/).SVG See Scalable Vector Graphics.Synchronized Accessible Media Interchange (SAMI) An HTML-like language used to embed captions in Windows Media files.Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) A markup language developed by the W3C that allows developers to separate multimedia content into distinct files and transmission streams such as text, images, audio, and video. These can then be sent to the user’s computer separately, reassembled, and displayed as intended. SMIL 2.1 became a recommendation in December 2005. 590 GLOSSARY OF TERMST table linearization See linearization. text equivalent A term used to describe the technique of providing a text alternative that will be the same in both content and function as a nontext object on a web page, such as an image map. text-only browser A A browser that does not show images. It does not have images turned off; rather, it just doesn’t display them. An example of a text-only browser is Lynx.UUCD See user-centered design. universal access The idea that all things on the Internet should be accessible by the largest audience possible, regardless of disability, location, device, or speed of connection to the Internet. It therefore differs from accessibility, which is solely concerned with access for people with disabilities. universal design Designing for the largest audience possible, regardless of disability or ability to speak the native language. This is a process rather than an end in itself. usability The idea that a website or web page is easily used by a web user. user agent A term used by the W3C as a generic description for “any software that retrieves and renders Web content for users” (www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/glossary. html#def-user-agent). A browser, mobile phone, screen reader, plug-in, or search engine’s web crawler may be considered a user agent.User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (UAAG) A document that provides guidelines for designing accessible user agents (browsers, assistive technologies, media players, and the like), published by the W3C in 2002. See www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/ for more information.591 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE user-centered design (UCD) The design process that places the user at the center of the design rather than the object to be designed. It is a philosophy and process rather than an end in itself.UAAG See User Agent Accessibility Guidelines.V voice input Software that recognizes voice commands and responds accordingly. voice output Software that reads the necessary information to the user, in a synthesized voice. voice recognition software Software that can be trained to recognize a person’s voice and either execute commands or turn the voice into text or other forms of media, such as sign language for the deaf.VoiceXML A type of XML that allows the user to interact with a web page using voice recognition software. voicing browser A browser that uses a synthesized voice as a means to communicate with the user. IBM Home Page Reader is an example. It differs from a screen reader in that a voicing browser is purely a web browser, whereas a screen reader reads any screen.WW3C See World Wide Web Consortium.WAI See Web Accessibility Initiative.WaSP See Web Standards Project.WAT-C See Web Accessibility Tools Consortium.WCAG See Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.592 GLOSSARY OF TERMSWeb Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Started by the W3C and its members, an organization that addresses web accessibility issues. See www.w3.org/WAI/ for more information.Web Accessibility Tools Consortium (WAT-C) Described as a consortium that “provides a collection of free tools to assist both developers and designers in the development and testing of accessible web content.” See www.wat-c.org/ for more information. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) A Guidelines developed by the W3C/WAI to address issues in building accessible web pages. WCAG 1.0 was published as long ago as 1999; WCAG 2.0 is “coming soon.”Web Standards Project (WaSP) Described as a project that “was formed in 1998 with the goal of promoting core web standards and encouraging browser makers to do the same, thereby ensuring simple, affordable access for all.” See http://webstandards.org/about/ for more information.World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) An international consortium of companies and organizations involved with the Internet and the World Wide Web, responsible for maintaining web technology standards, such as HTML and CSS. See www.w3.org/ for more information.XXHTML See Extensible Hypertext Markup Language.XML See Extensible Markup Language.XSL See Extensible Stylesheet Language.593 B GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEThis appendix is an excerpt from the Guide to the Section 508 Standards for Electronic and Information Technology, Subpart B – Technical Standards, Section 1194.22. This is the only section that is relevant to web developers/designers. The whole guide is available at www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/index.htm.Web-Based Intranet and Internet Information and Applications (1194.22) Updated: June 21, 2001These provisions of the standards provide the requirements that must be followed by Federal agencies when producing web pages. These provisions apply unless doing so would impose an undue burden.The key to compliance with these provisions is adherence to the provisions. Many agencies have purchased assistive software to test their pages. This will produce a better understanding of how these devices interact with different coding techniques. However, it always should be kept in mind that assistive technologies, such as screen readers, are complex programs and take extensive experience to master. For this reason, a novice user may obtain inaccurate results that can easily lead to frustration and a belief that the page does not comply with the standards.For example, all screen reading programs use special key combinations to read properly coded tables. If the novice user of assistive technology is not aware of these commands, the tables will never read appropriately no matter how well the tables have been formatted. A web site will be in compliance with the 508 standards if it meets paragraphs (a) through (p) of Section 1194.22. Please note that the tips and techniques discussed in the document for complying with particular sections are not necessarily the only ways of providing compliance with 508. In many cases, they are techniques developed by the Board, the Department of Education, and the Department of Justice that have been tested by users with a wide variety of screen reader software. With the evolution of technology, other techniques may become available or even preferable.596 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY(a) Text Tags (b) Multimedia Presentations(c) Color (d) Readability (style sheets)(e) Server-Side Image Maps (f) Client-Side Image Maps(g) & (h) Data Table (i) Frames(j) Flicker Rate (k) Text-Only Alternative(l) Scripts (m) Applets and Plug-Ins(n) Electronic Forms (o) Navigation Links B (p) Time Delays1194.22(a) A text equivalent for every non-text element shall be provided (for example via alt or longdesc attributes, or in element content). What is meant by a text equivalent? A text equivalent means adding words to represent the purpose of a non-text element. This provision requires that when an image indicates a navigational action such as “move to the next screen” or “go back to the top of the page,” the image must be accompanied by actual text that states the purpose of the image. This provision also requires that when an image is used to represent page content, the image must have a text description accompanying it that explains the meaning of the image. HTML Source Code: http://www.access-board.gov/597 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEHow much information actually needs to be in the text equivalent? The text information associated with a non-text element should, when possible, communicate the same information as its associated element. For example, when an image indicates an action, the action must be described in the text. The types of non-text elements requiring actual text descriptions are limited to those elements that provide information required for comprehension of content or those used to facilitate navigation. Web page authors often utilize transparent graphics for spacing. Adding a text description to these elements will produce unnecessary clutter for users of screen readers. For such graphics, an empty alt attribute is useful.Example of source code: What is meant by the term, non-text element? A non-text element is an image, graphic, audio clip, or other feature that conveys meaning through a picture or sound. Examples include buttons, checkboxes, pictures and embedded or streaming audio or video.HTML Source Code: How should audio presentations be treated? This provision requires that when audio presentations are available on a multimedia web page, the audio portion must be captioned. Audio is a non-textual element, so a text equivalent of the audio must be provided if the audio is part of a multimedia presentation, Multimedia includes both audio and video. If the presentation is audio only, a text transcript would meet this requirement.What are ways of assigning text to elements? There are several ways of providing textual information so that it can be recognized by assistive technology devices. For instance, the <img> tag can accept an alt attribute that will enable a web designer to include text that describes the picture directly in the <img> tag.HTML source code:Similarly, the <applet> tag for Java applets also accepts an alt attribute, but it only works for browsers that provide support for Java. Often, users with slower Internet connections will turn support for Java applets off. A better alternative for providing textual descriptions is to simply include the alternative text between opening and closing <applet> or <object> tags. For instance, if a web designer wanted to include an applet called MyCoolApplet in a web page, and also include a description that the applet shows a stock ticker displaying the current price of various stocks, the designer would use the following HTML coding for example:598 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<applet code="MyCoolApplet.class" width="200", height="100"> // This applet displays current stock prices for many popular stocks. </applet>Finally, yet another way of providing a textual description is to include it in the page in the surrounding context: Below is a picture of me during my great vacation! 1194.22(b) Equivalent alternatives for any multimedia presentation shall be synchronized with the presentation. What are considered equivalent alternatives? B Captioning for the audio portion and audio description of visual information of multimedia presentations are considered equivalent alternatives. This provision requires that when an audio portion of a multimedia production is captioned, as required in provision (a), the captioning must be synchronized with the audio. Synchronized captioning would be required so someone reading the captions could also watch the speaker and associate relevant body language with the speech.If a web site offers audio files with no video, do they have to be captioned? No, because it is not multimedia. However, since audio is a non-text element, a text equivalent, such as a transcript, must be available. Similarly, a (silent) web slide show presentation does not need to have an audio description accompanying it, but does require text alternatives to be associated with the graphics.If a Federal agency official delivers a live audio and video webcast speech, does it need to be captioned? Yes, this would qualify as a multimedia presentation and would require the speech to be captioned.Example:National Endowment for the Humanities: www.neh.gov/media/scottcaptions.ramNational Center for Accessible Media (NCAM): http://main.wgbh.org/wgbh/access/dvs/ lion.ram1194.22(c) Web pages shall be designed so that all information conveyed with color is also available without color, for example from context or markup. Why is this provision necessary? When colors are used as the sole method for identifying screen elements or controls, persons who are color-blind as well as those people who are blind or have low vision may find the web page unusable.599 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEDoes this mean that all pages have to be displayed in black and white? No, this provision does not prohibit the use of color to enhance identification of important features. It does, however, require that some other method of identification, such as text labels, must be combined with the use of color. This provision addresses not only the problem of using color to indicate emphasized text, but also the use of color to indicate an action. For example, a web page that directs a user to “press the green button to start” should also identify the green button in some other fashion than simply by color.This Illustration is a variation of the actual image published by the U.S. Access Board. To view the published illustration, visit www.access-board.gov/ sec508/guide/1194.22.htm#(c).Is there any way a page can be quickly checked to ensure compliance with this provision? There are two simple ways of testing a web page to determine if this requirement is being met: by either viewing the page on a black and white monitor, or by printing it out on a black and white printer. Both methods will quickly show if the removal of color affects the usability of the page.1194.22(d) Documents shall be organized so they are readable without requiring an associated style sheet. What are the potential problems posed by style sheets? Style sheets can enable users to define specific viewing preferences to accommodate their disability. For instance, users with low vision may create their own style sheet so that, regardless of what web pages they visit, all text is displayed in an extra large font with white characters on a black background. If designers set up their pages to override user- defined style sheets, people with disabilities may not be able to use those pages. For good access, therefore, it is critical that designers ensure that their web pages do not interfere with user-defined style sheets.600 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYIn general, the “safest” and most useful form of style sheets are “external” style sheets, in which the style rules are set up in a separate file. An example of an external style sheet is:Example of source code: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href= "section508.<a href="/tags/CSS/" rel="tag">css</a>">1194.22(e) Redundant text links shall be provided for each active region of a server-side image map. How do “image maps” work? An “image map” is a picture (often an actual map) on a web page that provides different “links” to other web pages, depending on where a user clicks on the image. There are two basic types of image maps: “client-side image maps” and “server-side image maps.” With B client-side image maps, each “active region” in a picture can be assigned its own “link” (called a URL or “Uniform Resource Locator”) that specifies what web page to retrieve when a portion of the picture is selected. HTML allows each active region to have its own alternative text, just like a picture can have alternative text (see §1194.22(a)). By contrast, clicking on a location of a server-side image map only specifies the coordinates within the image when the mouse was depressed. The ultimate selection of the link or URL must be deciphered by the computer serving the web page.Why is this provision necessary? When a web page uses a server-side image map to present the user with a selection of options, browsers cannot indicate to the user the URL that will be followed when a region of the map is activated. Therefore, the redundant text link is necessary to provide access to the page for anyone not able to see or accurately click on the map.1194.22(f) Client-side image maps shall be provided instead of server-side image maps except where the regions cannot be defined with an available geometric shape. Why do client-side image maps provide better accessibility? Unlike server-side image maps, the client-side image map allows an author to assign text to image map “hot spots.” This feature means that someone using a screen reader can easily identify and activate regions of the map. An explanation of how these image maps are constructed will help clarify this issue.Creating a basic client-side image map requires several steps:Identify an image for the map. First, an image must be used in a client-side image map. This image is identified using the <img> tag. To identify it as a map, use the usemap attribute. Use the <map> tag to identify “areas” within the map. The <map> tag is a container tag that includes various <area> tags that are used to identify specific portions of the image.601 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEUse <area> tags to identify map regions. To identify regions within a map, simply use <area> tags within the <map> container tags. Making this client-side image map accessible is considerably easier to describe: simply include the alt attribute and area description inside each <area> tag. The following HTML demonstrates how to make a client-side image map: <map name="Map"> <area shape="rect" coords="0,2,64,19" href="general.html" alt="information about us"> <area shape="rect" coords="65,2,166,20" href="jobs.html" alt="job opportunities" > <area shape="rect" coords="167,2,212,19" href="faq.html" alt="Frequently Asked Questions"> <area shape="rect" coords="214,2,318,21" href="location.html" alt="How to find us"> <area shape="rect" coords="319,2,399,23" href="contact.html" alt="How to contact us"> </map>1194.22(g) Row and column headers shall be identified for data tables. 1194.22(h) Markup shall be used to associate data cells and header cells for data tables that have two or more logical levels of row or column headers. Why are these two provisions necessary? Paragraphs (g) and (h) permit the use of tables, but require that the tables be coded according to the rules of the markup language being used for creating tables. Large tables of data can be difficult to interpret if a person is using a non-visual means of accessing the web. Users of screen readers can easily get “lost” inside a table because it may be impossible to associate a particular cell that a screen reader is reading with the corresponding column headings and row names. For instance, assume that a salary table includes the salaries for federal employees by grade and step. Each row in the table may represent a grade scale and each column may represent a step. Thus, finding the salary corresponding to a grade 9, step 5 may involve finding the cell in the ninth row and the fifth column. For a salary chart of 15 grade scales and 10 steps, the table will have at least 150 cells. Without a method to associate the headings with each cell, it is easy to imagine the difficulty a user of assistive technology may encounter with the table.Section 1194.22 (g) and (h) state that when information is displayed in a table format, the information shall be laid out using appropriate table tags as opposed to using a prefor- matted table in association with the <pre> tag. Web authors are also required to use one of several methods to provide an association between a header and its related information.602 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYHow can HTML tables be made readable with assistive technology? Using the Scope Attribute in Tables – Using the scope attribute is one of the most effective ways of making HTML compliant with these requirements. It is also the simplest method to implement. The scope attribute also works with some (but not all) assistive technology in tables that use colspan or rowspan attributes in table header or data cells.Using the Scope Attribute – The first row of each table should include column headings. Typically, these column headings are inserted in <th> tags, although <td> tags can also be used. These tags at the top of each column should include the following attribute: scope="col"By doing this simple step, the text in that cell becomes associated with every cell in that column. Unlike using other approaches (notably id and headers attributes) there is no B need to include special attributes in each cell of the table. Similarly, the first column of every table should include information identifying information about each row in the table. Each of the cells in that first column are created by either <th> or <td> tags. Include the following attribute in these cells: scope="row"By simply adding this attribute, the text in that cell becomes associated with every cell in that row. While this technique dramatically improves the usability of a web page, using the scope attribute does not appear to interfere in any way with browsers that do not support the attribute.Example of source code – the following simple table summarizes: the work schedule of three employees and demonstrates these principles.<table> <tr> <th> </th> <th scope="col">Spring</th> <th scope="col">Summer</th> <th scope="col">Autumn</th> <th scope="col">Winter</th> </tr> <tr> <td scope="row" >Betty</td> <td>9-5</td> <td>10-6</td> <td>8-4</td> <td>7-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td scope="row">Wilma</td> <td>10-6</td> <td>10-6</td> <td>9-5</td> <td>9-5</td>603 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE</tr> <tr> <td scope="row">Fred</td> <td>10-6</td> <td>10-6</td> <td>10-6</td> <td>10-6</td> </tr> </table>This table would be displayed as follows:Spring Summer Autumn WinterBetty 9-5 10-6 8-4 7-3Wilma 10-6 10-6 9-5 9-5Fred 10-6 10-6 10-6 10-6The efficiency of using the scope attribute becomes more apparent in much larger tables. For instance, if an agency used a table with 20 rows and 20 columns, there would be 400 data cells in the table. To make this table comply with this provision without using the scope attribute would require special coding in all 400 data cells, plus the 40 header and row cells. By contrast, using the scope attribute would only require special attributes in the 40 header and row cells.Using the “ID” and “Headers” Attributes in Tables Unlike using the scope attribute, using the id and headers attributes requires that every data cell in a table include special attributes for association. Although its usefulness for accessibility may have been diminished as browsers provide support for the scope attribute, the id and headers attributes are still very useful and provide a practical means of providing access in smaller tables.The following table is much more complicated than the previous example and demonstrates the use of the id and headers attributes and then the scope attribute. Both methods provide a means of complying with the requirements for data tables in web pages. The table in this example includes the work schedules for two employees. Each employee has a morning and afternoon work schedule that varies depending on whether the employee is working in the winter or summer months. The “summer” and “winter” columns each span two columns labeled “morning” and “afternoon.” Therefore, in each cell identifying the work schedule, the user needs to be told the employee’s name (Fred or Wilma), the season (Summer or Winter), and the shift (morning or afternoon).604 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<table> <tr> <th> </th> <th colspan="2" id="winter">Winter</th> <th colspan="2" id="summer">Summer</th> </tr> <tr> <th> </th> <th id="am1">Morning</th> <th id="pm1">Afternoon</th> <th id="am2">Morning</th> <th id="pm2">Afternoon</th> </tr> <tr> B <td id="wilma" >Wilma</td> <td headers="wilma am1 winter">9-11</td> <td headers="wilma pm1 winter">12-6</td> <td headers="wilma am2 summer">7-11</td> <td headers="wilma pm2 summer">12-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td id="fred">Fred</td> <td headers="fred am1 winter">10-11</td> <td headers="fred pm1 winter">12-6</td> <td headers="fred am2 summer">9-11</td> <td headers="fred pm2 summer">12-5</td> </tr> </table>This table would be displayed as follows:Winter SummerMorning Afternoon Morning AfternoonWilma 9-11 12-6 7-11 12-3Fred 10-11 12-6 9-11 12-5605 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCECoding each cell of this table with id and headers attributes is much more complicated than using the scope attribute shown below:<table> <tr> <th> </th> <th colspan="2" scope="col">Winter</th> <th colspan="2" scope="col">Summer</th> </tr> <tr> <th> </th> <th scope="col">Morning</th> <th scope="col">Afternoon</th> <th scope="col">Morning</th> <th scope="col">Afternoon</th> </tr> <tr> <td scope="row">Wilma</td> <td>9-11</td> <td>12-6</td> <td>7-11</td> <td>12-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td scope="row">Fred</td> <td>10-11</td> <td>12-6</td> <td>9-11</td> <td>12-5</td> </tr> </table>This table would be displayed as follows:Winter SummerMorning Afternoon Morning AfternoonWilma 9-11 12-6 7-11 12-3Fred 10-11 12-6 9-11 12-5606 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYIs the summary attribute an option? Although highly recommended by some web page designers as a way of summarizing the contents of a table, the summary attribute of the <table> tag is not sufficiently supported by major assistive technology manufacturers to warrant recommendation. Therefore, web developers who are interested in summarizing their tables should consider placing their descriptions either adjacent to their tables or in the body of the table, using such tags as the <caption> tag. In no event should web developers use summarizing tables as an alternative to making the contents of their tables compliant as described above.1194.22(i) Frames shall be titled with text that facilitates frame identification and navigation. Why is this provision necessary? B Frames provide a means of visually dividing the computer screen into distinct areas that can be separately rewritten. Unfortunately, frames can also present difficulties for users with disabilities when those frames are not easily identifiable to assistive technology. For instance, a popular use of frames is to create “navigational bars” in a fixed position on the screen and have the content of the web site retrievable by activating one of those navigational buttons. The new content is displayed in another area of the screen. Because the navigational bar doesn’t change, it provides a stable “frame-of-reference” for users and makes navigation much easier. However, users with disabilities may become lost if the dif- ferences between the two frames are not clearly established.What is the best method for identifying frames? The most obvious way to accomplish this requirement is to include text within the body of each frame that clearly identifies the frame. For instance, in the case of the navigation bar, a web developer should consider putting words such as “Navigational Links” at the begin- ning of the contents of the frame to let all users know that the frame depicts navigational links. Providing titles like this at the top of the contents of each frame will satisfy these requirements. An additional measure that should be considered by agencies is to include meaningful text in the <frame> tag’s title attribute. Although not currently supported by major manufacturers of assistive technology, the title attribute is part of the HTML 4.0 specification and was intended to let web developers include a description of the frame as a quote-enclosed string. Demonstrating the use of the title attribute requires a basic understanding of how frames are constructed. When frames are used in a web page, the first page that is loaded must include a <frameset> tag that encloses the basic layout of the frames on the page. Within the <frameset> tag, <frame> tags specify the name, initial contents, and appearance of each separate frame. Thus, the following example uses the title attribute to label one frame “Navigational Links Frame” and the second frame “Contents Frame.”<frameset cols="30%, 60%"> <frame src="navlinks.html" name="navlinks"➥ title="Navigational Links Frame"> <frame src="geninfo.html" name="contents_page"➥ title="Contents Frame"> </frame>607 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEWhile assistive technology does not yet widely support the title attribute, we recommend including this attribute in web pages using frames.Example: ADA Technical Assistance Program – the use of frames with “No Frames Link” www.adata.org1194.22(j) Pages shall be designed to avoid causing the screen to flicker with a frequency greater than 2 Hz and lower than 55 Hz. Why is this provision necessary? This provision is necessary because some individuals with photosensitive epilepsy can have a seizure triggered by displays that flicker, flash, or blink, particularly if the flash has a high intensity and is within certain frequency ranges. The 2 Hz limit was chosen to be consistent with proposed revisions to the ADA Accessibility Guidelines which, in turn, are being har- monized with the International Code Council (ICC)/ANSI A117 standard, “Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities,” ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 which references a 2 Hz limit. An upper limit was identified at 55 Hz.How can flashing or flickering elements be identified? Flashing or flickering elements are usually added through technologies such as animated gifs, Java applets, or third-party plug-ins or applications. Java applets and third-party plug- ins can be identified by the presence of <applet> or <object> tags. Animated gifs are images that download in a single file (like ordinary image files), but have content that changes over short periods of time. Like other images, however, they are usually incorpo- rated through the use of the <img> tag.608 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY1194.22(k) A text-only page, with equivalent information or functionality, shall be provided to make a web site comply with the provisions of these standards, when compliance cannot be accomplished in any other way. The content of the text-only page shall be updated whenever the primary page changes. What must a text-only page contain to comply with this provision? Text-only pages must contain equivalent information or functionality as the primary pages. Also, the text-only page shall be updated whenever the primary page changes.Example: Disability.gov displays a text-only page on home page. B HTML source code:<div ID="textonly"> <a HREF="../textonly/default.asp">Text Only</a> </div>Link: http://www.disability.gov/609 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE1194.22(l) When pages utilize scripting languages to display content, or to create interface elements, the information provided by the script shall be identified with functional text that can be read by assistive technology. What accessibility problems can scripts cause? Web page authors have a responsibility to provide script information in a fashion that can be read by assistive technology. When authors do not put functional text with a script, a screen reader will often read the content of the script itself in a meaningless jumble of numbers and letters. Although this jumble is text, it cannot be interpreted or used.How can web developers comply with this provision? Web developers working with JavaScript frequently use so-called JavaScript URLs as an easy way to invoke JavaScript functions. Typically, this technique is used as part of <a> anchor links. For instance, the following link invokes a JavaScript function called myFunction:<a href="javascript:myFunction();">Start myFunction</a>This technique does not cause accessibility problems for assistive technology. A more difficult problem occurs when developers use images inside of JavaScript URLs without providing meaningful information about the image or the effect of the anchor link. For instance, the following link also invokes the JavaScript function myFunction, but requires the user to click on an image instead of the text “Start myFunction”:<a href="javascript:myFunction();"></a>This type of link, as written, presents tremendous accessibility problems, but those problems can easily be remedied. The <img> tag, of course, supports the alt attribute that can also be used to describe the image and the effect of clicking on the link. Thus, the following revision remedies the accessibility problems created in the previous example:<a href="javascript:myFunction();"> </a>Another technique advocated by some developers is to use the title attribute of the <a> tag. For instance, the following example includes a meaningful description in a title attribute:<a title="this link starts myFunction" href="javascript:myFunction();➥ "></a>This tag is supported by some but not all assistive technologies. Therefore, while it is part of the HTML 4.0 specifications, authors should use the alt tag in the enclosed image.Finally, the browser’s status line (at the bottom of the screen) typically displays the URL of any links that the mouse is currently pointing towards. For instance, if clicking on an anchor link will send the user to http://www.usdoj.gov, that URL will be displayed in the status line if the user’s mouse lingers on top of the anchor link. In the case of JavaScript610 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYURLs, the status line can become filled with meaningless snips of script. To prevent this effect, some web developers use special “event handlers” such as onmouseover and onmouseout to overwrite the contents of the status line with a custom message. For instance, the following link will replace the content in the status line with a custom message “Nice Choice.”<a href="javascript:myFcn();" onmouseover="status='Nice Choice';➥ return true;" onmouseout="status='';"> </a>This text rewritten into the status line is difficult or impossible to detect with a screen reader. Although rewriting the status line did not interfere with the accessibility or inaccessibility of the JavaScript URL, web developers should ensure that all important informa- B tion conveyed in the status line also be provided through the alt attribute, as described above.JavaScript uses so-called “event handlers” as a trigger for certain actions or functions to occur. For instance, a web developer may embed a JavaScript function in a web page that automatically checks the content of a form for completeness or accuracy. An event handler associated with a “submit” button can be used to trigger the function before the form is actually submitted to the server for processing. The advantage for the government agency is that it saves government resources by not requiring the government’s server to do the initial checking. The advantage for the computer user is that feedback about errors is almost instantaneous because the user is told about the error before the information is even submitted over the Internet.Web developers must exercise some caution when deciding which event handlers to use in their web pages, because different screen readers provide different degrees of support for different event handlers. The following includes recommendations for using many of the more popular event handlers: onClick – The onClick event handler is triggered when the user clicks once on a particular item. It is commonly used on links and button elements and, used in connection with these elements, it works well with screen readers. If clicking on the element associated with the onClick event handler triggers a function or performs some other action, developers should ensure that the context makes that fact clear to all users. Do not use the onClick event handlers for form elements that include several options (e.g. select lists, radio buttons, checkboxes) unless absolutely necessary. onDblClick – The onDblClick event handler is set off when the user clicks twice rapidly on the same element. In addition to the accessibility problems it creates, it is very confusing to users and should be avoided. onMouseDown and onMouseUp – The onMouseDown and onMouseUp event handlers each handle the two halves of clicking a mouse while over an element – the process of (a) clicking down on the mouse button and (b) then releasing the mouse button. Like onDblClick, this tag should be used sparingly, if at all, by web developers because it is quite confusing. In most cases, developers should opt for the onClick event handler instead of onMouseDown. 611 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE onMouseOver and onMouseOut – These two event handlers are very popular on many web sites. For instance, so-called rollover gifs, which swap images on a web page when the mouse passes over an image, typically use both of these event handlers. These event handlers neither can be accessed by the mouse nor interfere with accessibility – a screen reader simply bypasses them entirely. Accordingly, web designers who use these event handlers should be careful to duplicate the information (if any) provided by these event handlers through other means. onLoad and onUnload – Both of these event handlers are used frequently to per- form certain functions when a web page has either completed loading or when it unloads. Because neither event handler is triggered by any user interaction with an element on the page, they do not present accessibility problems. onChange – This event handler is very commonly used for triggering JavaScript functions based on a selection from within a <select> tag. Surprisingly, it presents tremendous accessibility problems for many commonly used screen readers and should be avoided. Instead, web developers should use the onClick event handler (associated with a link or button that is adjacent to a <select> tag) to accomplish the same functions. onBlur and onFocus – These event handlers are not commonly used in web pages. While they don’t necessarily present accessibility problems, their behavior is confusing enough to a web page visitor that they should be avoided. 1194.22(m) When a web page requires that an applet, plug-in, or other application be present on the client system to interpret page content, the page must provide a link to a plug-in or applet that complies with §1194.21(a) through (l). Why is this provision necessary? While most web browsers can easily read HTML and display it to the user, several private companies have developed proprietary file formats for transmitting and displaying special content, such as multimedia or very precisely defined documents. Because these file formats are proprietary, web browsers cannot ordinarily display them. To make it possible for these files to be viewed by web browsers, add-on programs or “plug-ins” can be downloaded and installed on the user’s computer that will make it possible for their web browsers to display or play the content of the files. This provision requires that web pages that provide content such as Real Audio or PDF (Adobe Acrobat’s Portable Document Format) files also provide a link to a plug-in that will meet the software provisions. It is very common for a web page to provide links to needed plug-ins. For example, web pages containing Real Audio almost always have a link to a source for the necessary player. This provision places a responsibility on the web page author to know that a compliant application exists, before requiring a plug-in.How can plug-ins and applets be detected? Plug-ins can usually be detected by examining a page’s HTML for the presence of an <object> tag. Some plug-in manufacturers, however, may require the use of proprietary tags. Like plug-ins, applets can also be identified by the presence of an <object> tag in the HTML source for a web page. Also, an <applet> tag may signal the inclusion of an applet in a web page.612 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY1194.22(n) When electronic forms are designed to be completed on-line, the form shall allow people using assistive technology to access the information, field elements, and functionality required for completion and submission of the form, including all directions and cues. Why do electronic forms present difficulties to screen readers? Currently, the interaction between form controls and screen readers can be unpredictable, depending upon the design of the page containing these controls. HTML forms pose accessibility problems when web developers separate a form element from its associated label or title. For instance, if an input box is intended for receiving a user’s last name, the web developer must be careful that the words “last name” (or some similar text) appear near that input box or are somehow associated with it. Although this may seem like an B obvious requirement, it is extremely easy to violate because the visual proximity of a form element and its title offers no guarantee that a screen reader will associate the two or that this association will be obvious to a user of assistive technology.The following form demonstrates these problems. Visually, this form is part of a table and each field is carefully placed in table cells adjacent to their corresponding labels (n.b. formatting forms with tables are by no means the only situation presenting the accessibility problems inherent in forms; tables merely illustrate the problem most clearly).While the relationship between the titles “First Name” or “Last Name” and their respective input boxes may be obvious from visual inspection, the relationship is not obvious to a screen reader. Instead, a screen reader may simply announce “input box” when encoun- tering each input box. The reason for these difficulties is revealed from inspecting the HTML source for this table. The following code is a simplified version of this table.<form> <table> <tr> <td>FIRST NAME: </td> <td><input type="text" name="firstname"> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>LAST NAME: </td> <td><input type="text" name="lastname"> </td> </tr> </table> <input type="submit" value="submit"> </form>The two pairs of form elements are indicated in bold above. The problem created by laying out form elements inside of this table is now clear – the form elements are sepa- rated from their labels by the formatting instructions for the table.613 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEHow can developers provide accessible HTML forms? The first rule of thumb is to place labels adjacent to input fields, not in separate cells of a table. For the web developer who does not wish to place form elements immediately adjacent to their corresponding titles, the HTML 4.0 specification includes the <label> tag that lets web developers mark specific elements as “labels” and then associate a form element with that label. There are generally two ways to use the label tag: explicit labels and implicit labels.“Explicit Labels” Work WellExperience has shown that explicit labeling works extremely well with all popular assistive technology and is recommended in all but the very simplest of tables. We recommend that all agencies ensure that their web developers are familiar with these important concepts. Using “explicit” labels involves two distinct steps:Use the <label> tag and associated for attribute to tag labels. In other words, identify the exact words that you want to use as the label for the form element and enclose those words in a <label> tag. Use the form attribute to uniquely identify that element. Use the id attribute in the associated form element. Every form element supports the id attribute. By setting this attribute to the identifier used in the form attribute of the associated <label> tag, you “tie” that form element to its associated label. For instance, we have rewritten the HTML code for our simple form-inside-a-table to include explicit labels below. The new HTML for the explicit labels is indicated in bold:<form> <table> <tr> <td><label for="first"> first name:</label> </td> <td><input type="text" name="firstname" id="first"></td> </tr> <tr> <td><label for="last"> last name:</label> </td> <td><input type="text" name="lastname" id="last"></td> </tr> </table> <input type="submit" value="submit"> </form>614 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYIn a nutshell, that’s all there is to making HTML form elements accessible to assistive technology. Experience has shown that this technique works extremely well in much more complicated and convoluted forms and it should work well in all agency HTML forms.Avoid Using “Implicit Labels”In “implicit” labels, the form element and its associated label are contained within an opening <label> tag and a closing </label> tag. For instance, in the table above, an implicit label to associate the words “First Name” with its associated input cell, we could use an implicit label as follows:<label> <tr> <td>first name:</td> B <td><input type="text" name="firstname"></td> </tr> </label>Experience has shown that implicit labeling should be avoided for two reasons. First, implicit labeling is not reliably supported by many screen readers and, in particular, does not work well if explicit labels are simultaneously used anywhere on the same web page. Often, the output can be wildly inaccurate and confusing. Second, if any text separates a label from its associated form element, an implicit label becomes impractical and confusing because the label itself is no longer easily identified with the form element.1194.22(o) A method shall be provided that permits users to skip repetitive navigation links. Why do navigational links present impediments to screen readers and other types of assistive technologies? This provision provides a method to facilitate the easy tracking of page content that provides users of assistive technology the option to skip repetitive navigation links. Web developers routinely place a host of routine navigational links at a standard location – often across the top, bottom, or side of a page. If a nondisabled user returns to a web page and knows that he or she wants to view the contents of that particular page instead of selecting a navigation link to go to another page, he or she may simply look past the links and begin reading wherever the desired text is located. For those who use screen readers or other types of assistive technologies, however, it can be a tedious and time- consuming chore to wait for the assistive technology to work through and announce each of the standard navigational links before getting to the intended location. In order to alle- viate this problem, the section 508 rule requires that when repetitive navigational links are used, there must be a mechanism for users to skip repetitive navigational links.615 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEExample: USDA Target Center and DOL web sites use Skip Repetitive Navigational Links. http://www.usda.gov/oo/target.htm http://www.dol.gov/dol/odep/616 GUIDE TO THE SECTION 508 STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY1194.22(p) When a timed response is required, the user shall be alerted and given sufficient time to indicate more time is required. Why do timed responses present problems to web users with disabilities? Web pages can be designed with scripts so that the web page disappears or “expires” if a response is not received within a specified amount of time. Sometimes, this technique is used for security reasons or to reduce the demands on the computer serving the web pages. Someone’s disability can have a direct impact on the speed with which he or she can read, move around, or fill in a web form. For instance, someone with extremely low vision may be a slower-than-average reader. A page may “time out” before he is able to finish reading it. Many forms, when they “time out” automatically, also delete whatever data has been entered. The result is that someone with a disability who is slow to enter B data cannot complete the form. For this reason, when a timed response is required, the user shall be alerted via a prompt and given sufficient time to indicate whether additional time is needed.Example: Thrift Savings Plan www.tsp.gov617 C OVERVIEW OF PAS 78 GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE IN COMMISSIONING ACCESSIBLE WEBSITES by Bruce Lawson WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEOn March 8, 2006, the British Standards Institution (BSI) launched a Publicly Available Specification (PAS) as a guide to good practice in commissioning accessible websites. The document was commissioned by the UK’s Disability Rights Commission, which describes itself as “an independent body established in April 2000 by Act of Parliament to stop discrimination and promote equality of opportunity for disabled people.” The BSI develops and owns the copyright for PAS 78. It costs £30 plus sales tax and is available in a variety of formats, including accessible PDF, from www.bsi-global.com/ICT/ PAS78/.The Background of PAS 78 In April 2004, the UK Government-funded Disability Rights Commission (DRC) conducted a formal investigation into the state of web accessibility in the UK, discovering that 81 per- cent of sites failed to uphold the simplest World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) recommendations. Based on the DRC’s findings, the authors of the Formal Investigation: The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled People report (in conjunction with City University) offered some additional advice to developers:Reduce the number of links and ensure that genuine and necessary links are clearly identified as such.Why reduce the number of links? Skip navigation is an excellent idea, but removing links seems almost anti-Web. And what is an “unnecessary” link?Avoid site fragmentation: navigation mechanisms should be consistent (for example, in appearance and behavior), the relative importance of different sections (across the site and within pages) should be apparent, and markup languages should be used to indicate the structure of pages. Preserve links to the homepage. Improve search design.These are not particularly helpful. At least define what is inadequate about (presumably) all of the searches surveyed, so we can deduce what might consti- tute “improvement.”Eradicate excessively deep site structures, and ensure that page titles are informative.620 OVERVIEW OF PAS 78 GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE IN COMMISSIONING ACCESSIBLE WEBSITESWith shallow and wide site structures, one would assume more links on each level’s navigation menus, surely contravening the first instruction to reduce the number of links.The report also courts controversy with Finding 5:Nearly half (45%) of the problems experienced by disabled users when attempting to navigate websites cannot be attributed to explicit violations of the Web Accessibility Initiative Checkpoints. Although some of these reflect shortcomings in the assistive technology used, most reflect the limitations of the Checkpoints themselves as a comprehensive interpretation of the intent of the Guidelines.The W3C responded (www.w3.org/2004/04/wai-drc-statement.html), claiming that the C report’s authors didn’t really understand the guidelines:W3C/WAI’s examination of the DRC data available as of 14 April 2004 shows that 95% of the barriers reported are indeed covered by existing checkpoints in WAI Guidelines . . . Essentially, the interpretation of the data in the report fails to account for the role of browser and media player accessibility, and the role of interoperability with assistive technologies, in ensuring that people with disabilities can use Web sites effectively.The fact that none of these questionable technical recommendations are repeated in PAS 78 suggests that the DRC no longer stands by them (and rightly so, in my opinion).The DRC report is quasi-available at http://www.drc-gb.org/library/webaccessibility. asp. Ironically, however, the DRC seems incapable of publishing it in HTML, so Joe Clark has converted it and hosts it at http://joeclark.org/dossiers/DRC-GB.html.After the formal investigation into accessibility, the DRC decided that businesses needed some guidelines on how to begin making accessible websites, which eventually became the PAS.This specification was initially authored by Julie Howell, an accessibility campaigner who works for the Royal National Institute for the Blind, and a Steering Group consisting of representatives of groups like the BBC, UK Cabinet office, IBM, Tesco, University College London, and the Usability Professionals’ Association. It was then reviewed by a large team of stakeholders (including this author), and launched on March 8, 2006.621 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEWhat PAS 78 Is Not It is important to stress that PAS 78 is not a British Standard. Standards take a long time to develop because they require unanimity from all participants. A PAS is reviewed every two years, and may therefore be amended if circumstances change. In the fast-moving pace of the Web, this isn’t a bad thing. The DRC’s announcement explains:A PAS is not a full British Standard but is developed using the same rigorous processes. We are supporting a PAS on website accessibility as it can be introduced more quickly than a British Standard which can often take several years to be introduced. The other advantage of supporting a PAS is that it can be updated frequently.A further cause of confusion is the audience for PAS 78. While it was originally intended for developers, the terms of reference were changed early in the process. The PAS is intended to help people who commission web design, rather than developers themselves. There’s little in the PAS that an experienced web professional who has read this book wouldn’t know. It is written as a document that commissioners can understand and can use to discuss accessibility issues with web design project managers. Thus, PAS 78 is not a technical document, although reference is made to Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) guidelines, usability testing, automated checking tools, and so on.It is also vital to note that PAS 78 is not compulsory.The Guidance in PAS 78 The PAS makes various recommendations regarding commissioning accessible websites, which I’ll briefly summarize here (numbers refer to the paragraph of the PAS, which I can’t quote, as the copyright belongs to the BSI).The PAS states that developers should follow the lead of the W3C and WCAG 1.0 (7.1.1). It also explicitly advises the use of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), as a way to separate content from presentation (7.1.2–4).The PAS notes that PDF and Flash are proprietary (but published) formats that have signif- icantly increased their accessibility in recent releases (4.2.2.2). The PAS recommends that PDF/Flash only be used to benefit the end user, not the content authors. It is generally accepted that well-thought-out Flash can benefit some users with cognitive disabilities, so this is a point well made. However, a common reason for using <a href="/tags/PDF/" rel="tag">PDFs</a> is to quickly repur- pose printed documents to be on the Web, without all that tedious HTML coding. Additionally, some organizations favor PDFs because they believe that format can preserve branding, corporate typefaces, and the like. These particular reasons are perceived to benefit the originating organization, but generally are of no benefit over HTML to the end users, regardless of their disability.622 OVERVIEW OF PAS 78 GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE IN COMMISSIONING ACCESSIBLE WEBSITESThe PAS draws the distinction between technical accessibility and real, usable accessibility, and advises involvement of users at all stages of the design process. It advocates the pub- lication of an accessibility policy prominently on the site (6.1.1). The policy should be a working document that can form the basis of contracts with third-party suppliers (6.1.4). It should also explain the level of accessibility supported, who to contact with problems, and an honest statement of what is inaccessible, along with a reasonable estimate of when the repairs will be made and how people with disabilities can access this information or these services via alternative means (6.2.4).Refreshingly, the PAS cautions against overreliance on automated accessibility testing suites, noting that they assist checking for technical accessibility (8.3.1), but manual checks should always be undertaken and nothing replaces actual user testing (4.3.1–2). Throughout the document, considerable emphasis is placed on involving people with disabilities at all stages of design and testing, using a user-centered design methodology.Therefore, like the authors of this book, the PAS recommends designing for accessibility wherever possible, rather than attempting to retrofit a website after it’s built (8.1.6) and C that the site, once built, should be regularly checked (8.5.1). All organizations, large or small, should make certain that it’s not only the developers who do the testing.Not all the responsibility for accessibility is placed on the author, however. Annex G is a checklist for those purchasing authoring tools to ensure that it is even possible for proposed off-the-shelf content management systems to separate the content and styling, add alt-text, and so on. Suppliers are referred to an organization’s accessibility policy (Annex C3), and it is suggested that suppliers list circumstances where their system will not gener- ate sufficiently compliant documents, and how they propose to repair these shortcomings.The PAS also recognizes that it takes two to tango—if you do your bit to author accessibly and design to meet the standards, the user must come equipped with a browser and any necessary assistive technologies that are smart enough to understand your pages, specifically noting that this is beyond the control of the developer (6.4.4.4).The Impact of PAS 78 It is possible that the cost alone may prevent momentum towards PAS 78’s adoption by opinion formers. The cost inhibits the number of people who can debate and discuss its content, particularly as the BSI vigorously enforces its copyright. Also, compliance with the PAS is voluntary (it is simply guidance, after all). It doesn’t have the force of a full-fledged British Standard, although the names of the BSI and DRC should give it some prestige.Nevertheless, I believe PAS 78 offers some good advice, including practical checklists on how to choose prepackaged software and how to choose a developer. It contains many sensible, practical suggestions to nontechnical commissioners, and the material describes best practice that is applicable far beyond the borders of the UK.623 WEB ACCESSIBILITY: WEB STANDARDS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCEThe Legal Impact of PAS 78 Some in the UK have complained that it costs £30 for a document upon which “legal cases may be brought,” but this is a false argument. The legal criteria that a UK website must meet are defined by the Disability Discrimination Act. It is perfectly possible to make accessible websites without reading the PAS.However, PAS 78 is sponsored and supported by the DRC, and it would therefore seem likely that a business in the process of implementing the PAS could claim that it was attempting to do its duty under the Disability Discrimination Act, if it came to court.Struan Robertson, of the legal firm Pinsent Masons, and editor of the useful OUT-LAW.com, commented (www.out-law.com/page-6713):The DRC’s endorsement of PAS 78 is significant and it could be used in court to illustrate whether a business has complied with the Disability Discrimination Act. A failure to follow it could be damaging to an organisation’s case; but compliance would be evidence of steps being taken to fulfill the legal duty.It will be interesting indeed to see whether the PAS is cited in any court cases in the next few years, or whether the DRC and its successors will remain in the role of toothless watchdog.624 INDEX INDEXSymbols accessibility features standards, external and internal ! important operator 258 Adobe Reader 368–379 78–79 * selector 258 Green Methods homepage 185 support infrastructure 77–78 @import rule Accessibility for Ontarians with Accessibility panel <style> element 257 Disabilities Act. See AODA assigning reading order 354 @media rule Accessibility in the User-Centered assigning text equivalents 346 <link> element 287 Design Process 28 Description field 350 Accessibility Internet Rally (AIR) Make Child Objects Accessible 234–235 option 357 A accessibility laws and policies 548 Make Object Accessible option <a> element Australia 548–550 348 See also anchors 136 Austria 550–551 Shortcut field 358 combining active images with text Belgium 551–553 turning off auto-labeling 350 147 Brazil 553 Accessibility section href attribute 136 Canada 554 Preferences dialog box 368 title attribute 610 Denmark 555 accessibility settings absolute positioning 273–275 European Union 556–558 Preferences pane of RealPlayer 95 ACB (American Council of the Blind) Finland 558 Accessibility Task Force (ATF) 582 skip navigation links 187–188 France 559 accessible content, creating 128–176 Access Board Germany 559–560 accessible technologies See also Section 508 Hong Kong 561 CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) frames title requirements 196 Ireland 561–562 88–89 recommendations for server-side Italy 562–565 Flash 91–92 maps 203 Japan 565–568 HTML and XHTML 87–88 Access Instruction pages Korea 569 introduction 86 San José Access Standards Luxembourg 569 Java 99 require 58 Netherlands 570 JavaScript 89 access keys standard 493 New Zealand 571–573 PDF 93 Access Now v. Southwest Airlines Norway 573–574 QuickTime, Windows Media, and 520–521, 540 Portugal 574–575 RealPlayer 96–97 accessibility Singapore 576 Section 508 requirement 524, 526, See also Web accessibility Spain 577 536 addressing accessibility early in Sweden 577 SMIL (Synchronized Multimedia web design 61 Thailand 577 Integration Language) 93–94, design principles of WCAG 2.0 United Kingdom 578–579 96 462–464 Accessibility object SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) fostering positive approach to isActive() method 357 97–98 47–49 accessibility organization XML and XSL 99–100 guidelines for web development accessibility awareness 74–75 AccessiWeb label 54 authority required 72–73 BrailleNet Association 559 incorporating at design phase of feedback process 75–76 achromatopsia 154 planning 79 implementation Act on equal treatment on the accessibility awareness 74–75 handover to AO 82 grounds of handicap or accessibility checker initiall assessment 81–82 chronic illness 570 Adobe Acrobat 404 phased approach 80 ActionScript accessibility checking software plan 82 accessibility properties 348 Bobby 420–424 makeup of 71 forceSimple property 357 InFocus 424–429 need for 70 shortcut property 358 introduction 419–420 problems with ad hoc approach tabIndex property 355 LIFT Machine 429–433 70–71 ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act, Ramp Ascend 434–437 public representation 80 1990) 512, 523–528, 582 test suite 446–456 quality asurance 76–77 accessibility of state and local WebKing 437–441 scope, goals and functions 73–74 government websites 517–518 WebXM 441–445 staff for legal matters 78 and the Internet 513628 INDEX applicability to web services and Adobe Reader definition 582 sales 214 accessibility features 368 displaying using IE 119 applying to the Internet 516–517 changing document colors 368, empty alt attributes 598 Carparts Distribution Center v. 370 example 4–6 Automotive Wholesaler’s horizontal scrolling 373 finding effective solution to Association of New England Read Out Loud feature 375–376 issue 21 522 resizing documents 372 guidelines on providing 151 complaint process 518–519 support for assistive technology images used as links 209 complaints against the City of 377–378 internal structure and time San José 56–58 zooming feature 372 savings 143 current ADA case law 519 AIMIA (Australian Interactive keeping concise 136, 141 Access Now v. Southwest Multimedia Industry providing and using alt-text for Airlines 520–521, 540 Association) images 14–15 Ford v. Schering-Plough developing websites for 550 responsibilities of technical Corporation 522 AIR (Accessibility Internet Rally) components 15 Hooks v. OKBridge 521–522 234–235 San José Access Standards Martin v. Metropolitan Atlanta Ajax require 58 Transportation Authority 519 definition 582 script 610 other ADA cases 522 use of JavaScript 89 survey of PC Magazine Top 100 Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Alert sites 151 Company 522 enabling accessibility 361 treatment of uninformative effective communication algorithmic testing images 144 requirement of 57 applets and plug-ins 417 uninformative images 146 myths surrounding accessiblity client-side image maps 413 use of file names for 409 514–516 color coding 411 value of 144 Section 508 standards and 516 complex tables 414 Alva Access Group selected ADA accessible web contrasted with human OutSpoken screen reader 107 complaints 523 judgment 408 America Online. See AOL credit card companies monthly flicker rate 415 American Council of the Blind statements 531 frames 415 See ACB National Federation of the Blind online forms 417 Americans with Disabilities Act. v. America Online 527–528 redundant text links 412 See ADA Office for Civil Rights, U.S. scripting 416 anchors Department of Education skip navigation 418 placing image links inside 134 523–526 style sheets 412 placing images inside 209 online banking settlements synchronized multimedia 411 Andrew, Scott 528–530 table headers 413 adding event handlers to online IRS tax filing services 531 text equivalents 409 elements 310 online voting 530 text-only pages 416 animated GIFs travel websites settlement timed responses 418 browser control over agreements 532–533 alt attribute animation 174 websites and tax fraud 531 <applet> element 598 frequency range 176 websites and USDOJ Project Civic <img> element 133, 598, 610 Annex E Access 532 must be specified for <IMG> and Italian Ministerial Decree of July 8, ADA Technical Assistance Program <AREA> elements 15 2005 564 website alt-text AODA (Accessibility for Ontarians demonstrating compliant use of alternative styles 141 with Disabilities Act) 554 frames 608 as specified in SC1.1.1 133 AOL (America Online, Inc.) Adobe Acrobat benefits of involving users in America Online Accessibility See also PDF files evaluation 41 Policy 528 accessibility checker 404 checking for images 41 National Federation of the Blind v. tagged PDF forms 241 creating links on invisible images America Online 527–528 189–190629 INDEXApple Accessibility API using inaccessible forms 220–222 automatic redirects 295 Adobe Reader delivers using corrected form 223, 225 Ava information to platform 378 using prompting text 227 visual impairement use case Apple Macintosh Asynchronous JavaScript and XML. scenario 339 OutSpoken screen reader 107 See AJAX <applet> element ATAG (Authoring Tools Accessibility alt attribute 598 Guidelines) B applets definition 583 back button functionality, breaking definition 582 guidelines on components of web 295 Section 508 provisions 537, 541, accessibility 18 backgrounds 259 612 introduction 19 colors 259 testing for Section 508 ATAP (Association of Tech Act contrasting with foreground 260 compliance 417 Projects) images 260 Arditi, Aries comparison of Section 508 and Bank of America Effective Color Contrast 260 WCAG 130 online banking settlements <area> element ATF (Accessibility Task Force) 582 528–530 attributes 202 ATM (Automated Teller Machines) banking websites client-side image maps 602 online banking settlements and Australia 550 Arizona Democrat Presidential provision of 528–530 barriers to accessibility Primary, March 2000 Attorney General, Eliot Spitzer focusing evaluation 30 online voting 530 settlements with travel websites prioritizing evaluation and repairs arrow keys 532 by area 30 used by HPR in reading mode 114 attributes attribute prioritizing repairs by barrier Asakawa, Chieko node attributes and methods 307 31–32 HPR designer 112 audio transcripts 153 baselines 470 assessment audio broadcasts definition 583 implementing accessibility Section 508 542–543 Basic Law on the Formation of an organization 81–82 audio files Advanced Information and assistive technology 13, 104 providing text information for 131 Telecommunications Network See also HPR; JAWS; and Window- providing transcripts 152 Society, Japan 567 Eyes Section 508 provision on Belgium alt-text 15 multimedia 598 accessibility laws and policies 551 and tables 170–173 auditory CSS 286 BlindSurfer Project 551–552 browsers 112 Australia Flanders plan for accessible talking browsers 112–115 banking and AIMIA websites 550 websites 553 text browsers 114–115 DDA (Disability Discrimination Act Wallooon government 553 definition 582 1992) 548–549 Berners-Lee, Tim demonstration versions 128 government web site standards W3C Director 63 generating links 208 550 BITV (Ordinance on Barrier-Free making HTML tables readable 603 Australian Interactive Multimedia Information Technology) 560 performance with image maps 140 Industry Association (AIMIA) blank input screens, detecting 216 performance with images developing websites for 550 blind users 296 including alt text 138 Austria See also visually impaired screen magnification 116–117 accessibility laws and policies and accessibility 39 screen readers 104–111 550–551 typical surfing behavior 105 skipping text blocks 194 authoring tools 12 use case scenario 339 Window Eyes 195 alt-text 15 BlindSurfer Project 551–552 support for frames 198–199 Authoring Tools Accessiblity <blink> element support for in Adobe Guidelines (ATAG) possible cause of flicker 175 Reader 377–378 definition 583 <blockquote> element 264 support infrastructure 77 Authoring Tools Accessiblity as indentation technique 162 using electronic forms online 613 Guidelines, WAI 65 Bobby 40, 419–420, 583 Auto Label option analyzing files 422–423 providing text equivalents 349 choosing tests 420–422630 INDEX examining results 423 captioning Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace report formats 424 Flash support for 92 Lessig, Lawrence 512 Braille real time captioning 543 color 259 French BrailleNet and BrailleSurf Section 508 542–543, 599 background and foreground initiatives 559 Web accessibility example 6 contrast 260 limited benefit from using with Carparts Distribution Center v. background and text colors 259 ATMs 528–530 Automotive Wholesaler’s background images 260 non-availability of copies as basis Association of New England caution when using to convey of Maguire v. SOCOG 59 522 information 154 readers 105 Cascading Style Sheets. See CSS color vision deficiency 154–155 BrailleNet Association case studies. See redesigning contrast 155–156 AccessiWeb label 559 university website creating tagged PDFs in Word Brainbench website cells and screen readers 159 389 timed response example 242 Center for Information Technology Flash support for 92 Brazil Accommodation 517 conveying information through accessibility laws and policies 553 charts and text equivalents 135 other means 261 Brewer, Judy (WAI) Check Box Section 508 provisionrelating to IPO Director 64 enabling accessibility 360 information conveyed with browsers childNodes attribute color 599 See also Opera node tree navigation 307 text colors 259testing for Section and blind users 107 Civil Rights Act 1964 508 compliance 411 definition 583 legacy 512 Color Contrast Checker displaying image map features 140 Clark, Joe Snook, Jonathan 260 problems with CSS specifications Type and Colour 260 color-blindness 496 classification of images 133 use case scenario 339 settings for testing pages 119, 121 charts and graphs 135 column headers sniffing 295, 329 decorating images 148 Section 508 provisions 602–604, status line and screen readers 611 formatting images 144–146 606–607 style sheets 259 image buttons 135 Combo Box support for non-mouse image links 134 enabling accessibility 360 interaction 88 image map hot spots 134 Commitment to Advancement of testing website accessibility 117 images without information the Status of Persons with text browsers 114–115 content 135 Disabilities, UN 54 bullet style lists 281 click Common Look and Feel for the Bush, George W., U.S. President example of suspicious alt-text 409 Internet, Canada 554 remarks on section 508 534 Click Here complaint process buttons as form components poor link target identification 208 ADA (Americans with Disabilities 217–218 client-side image maps 139–140, Act, 1990) 518–519 201–202 complaints filed due to inaccessible complex examples 204–205 web design 56 C example of inaccessibility 142 ADA v. City of San José 56–58 California Community Colleges preferred by Section 508 and Maguire v. SOCOG 58–59 OCR compliance review 525 WCAG 203 complex tables California Council for the Blind Section 508 provision 601–602 testing for Section 508 accessible banking services testing for Section 508 compliance 414 528–530 compliance 413 compliance reviews California OCR Letters of Resolution using on U.S. Senate website 201 Office of Civil Rights 525 ADA web accessibility complaints Clinton, William J., U.S. President 58 required by Section 508 535–536 523 cloneNode method 306 components, enabling accessibility Canada CMS (content management system) 360 implementation of WCAG 1.0 554 584 Configure Custom Guidelines <caption> element 607 CNN (Cable News Network) dialog box summary attribute 170 invisible image skip navigation Bobby 421 links 188 conformance 471 assistive technology 195 631 INDEXConnecticut Attorney Generals’ basics 253–254 text margins and indentation Office browser style sheets 259 264–265 online IRS tax filing services embedded style sheets 256 text sizing 262–264 and 531 inline styles 255 CSS2 and features for controling content linked and imported style display 258 creating accessible content sheets 256–257 128–176 user style sheets 257–258 interface elements must be benefits of using for layout 489 D operable 463 colors and backgrounds 259 D-Links 584 must be readable 464 background and text colors 259 San José Access Standards perceivability as design principle background images 260 require 58 of WCAG 2.0 462 contrasting background and data attribute robustness 464 foreground 260 node attributes and methods 307 content developers 13 other means of conveying Data Grid, enabling accessibility 361 responsibilities for alt-text 15 information 261 data input issues 214 responsibility in accessible definition 583 data tables 163–164 websites 39 image replacement guidelines and standards 164–165 content management system (CMS) abuse 270–271 irregular data tables 168–169 584 CSS on, images off 268 layered data tables 166–168 context, information provided by 138 deprecated techniques 270 Section 508 provisions 602–604, contrast 155–156 <img> elements 270 606–607 control labels scalable Inman Flash simple data tables 165–166 designing accessible Flash 344 Replacement 269 Davidson, Mike and Inman, Shaun control roles techniques 267–268 scalable Inman Flash Replacement designing accessible Flash 344 lack of in original university (sIFR) 269 control states website 478 DDA (Disability Discrimination Act designing accessible Flash 345 layout and positioning 181–182, 1992), Australia 58, 548–549, control structure 271 584 designing accessible Flash 345 bullet style lists 281 DDA (Disability Discrimination Act coord attribute centered elastic-width column 1995) UK 578, 584 <area> element 202 272–273 deaf people corporate social responsibility empty table cells 282 forms accessibility 241 Web accessibility and equal heading, footer, and two liquid Section 508 provision relating to opportunities 8 columns 276–278 captioning 543 costs invisible labels for form use case scenario 340 inaccessible web design 544 elements 280–281 decorative images 144 of providing accessibility 514 navigation design 279–280 text equivalents 148 Create Spider Wizard 426 three columns using absolute Delorie Software. See Lynx Viewer createElement method 306, 326 positioning 273–275 Denmark createTextNode method 306 non-screen media 285 accessibility laws and policies 555 document object 298 auditory CSS 286 description property 348 credit card companies media-specific style Design for all. See Universal Design accessible monthly statements 531 sheets 286–287 design phase of planning cross-disability nature of accessiblity paged media 286 incorporating accessibility 543 problems with browsers 496 issues 79 cross-server-scripting. See XSS testing and validation 287–288 design principles CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) 583 text and fonts 261 Web accessibility example 6 alternative style sheets 282 font-family property 266 design principles of WCAG specification 282 letter and word spacing 2.0 462–464 switching style sheets 283 266–267 designing Flash accessibility 342–343 zoom layouts 283–285 letter case 267 control labels 344 and accessibility 88–89, 248 text direction 267 control roles 344 benefits of style sheets 248–253 control states 345 control structure 345632 INDEX device independence Down Syndrome children empty text input controls Web accessibility example 6 website designed for teaching safe WCAG guidelines 215 dexterity impaired users 297 surfing 91 enableAccessibility() command 360 DHTML, development of 292 downloading access software enterprise, implementing digital divide 55 identified as a barrier to accessibility 70 disenfranchisement of disabled accessiblity 58 epileptic seizures people 530 DRC (Disability Rights Commission) flicker as possible cause of 173 direct discrimination endorsement of PAS 78 624 equal opportunities Maguire v SOCOG 59 Drempels Weg, (away with barriers) Web accessibility essential for 7–8 direction property 267 570 ESC (European Economic and Social disability and access 2 drop-downs Committee) 556 accessibility and usability 26–28 difficulty with providing effective European Union economic impact 55 levels of grouping 482 accessibility laws and policies 556 effective communication problems with navigation on eEurope and i2010 requirement of ADA 57 original university website 503 initiatives 556–557 evolution of public policy 54 DTD (Document Type Definition) 584 EU web accessibility benchmarking harmful myths 32–42 dynamic content cluster 558 involving disabled people in Web distinction 538 implementation of WCAG 1.0 556 accessibility projects 22, 41 dyslexia 585 European Year of Disabled People, learning from disabled people 25 2003 556 legal requirements 54 evaluation tools 13 recruiting disabled people for Web E alt-text 15 accessibility projects 22–25 e-commerce harmful myths 40–42 U.S. disability rights legislation 512 e-banking, e-education and event handlers Disability Rights Commission e-government 55 browser status line and 611 commissioning of PAS 78 620 e-Europe Action Plan 2002 556 Ewers, Neal disability.gov website ECMAScript 585 screen reader video illustrating use of text-only educational institutions demonstration 106 versions 609 complaints about accessibility to Excellence through Accessibility disenfranchisement disabled students 523 Award program disabled people by online voting Effective Color Contrast McAleese, Mary 561 530 Arditi, Aries 260 expense in creating accessible display property elderly people websites 38–39 <page> elements 322 Japanese accessibilty concerns 568 explicit labels 614 display:none property Web accessibility 9 exposing state 351–352 treatment of ny screen readers 89 Election.com 530 do nothing commands 329 Electronic and Information DOCTYPE, using 487 Technology Accessibility F document object Standards. See Section 508 FCA (False Claims Act) violations createTextNode method 298 electronic forms misrepresenation of Section 508 getElementById method 298 legal requirements and 540 compliance 535 getElementsById method 306 Section 508 provision 613–615 FCC (Federal Communications getElementsByTagName method Electronic Signatures in Global and Commission) 304, 306 National Commerce Act role with respect to Section 255 write method 326 accessibilty problems associated 533 Document Type Definition (DTD) 584 with 56 feedback process documentation element visibility accessibility organization 75–76 Section 508 provisions relating to unobtrusive JavaScript 321–326 <fieldset> element 537 Emacspeak browser using for sets of controls 231, 233 Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance availability for UNIX 107 file types Company 522 embedded style sheets 256 algorithmic testing for text DOM (Document Object Model) 584 empty alt attributes 598 equivalents 409 detecting blank input screens 216 empty table cells 282 Finland use by screen readers 104, 107 accessibility laws and policies 558633 INDEXFirefox user requirements 338 formatting images 144 and accessible Flash information key questions 338 spacer images 144–145 341 use case scenarios 338-340 text equivalents 146 definition 586 using color wisely 363 forms support for non-mouse interaction Flash Player 6 accessibility issues 214 88 first accessible version of Flash accessible forms FirstGov portal site platform 341 form enhancements 332–334 skip navigation links 190 Fleet National Bank form validation 333 Flash 338 accessible banking services 528 JavaScript and 331–332 accessibility and 86, 91–92 Flex best practices 227 accessibility challenges 543 definition 586 <fieldset> and <legend> best practices 345–346 features 91 elements 231, 233 control animation 357 flicker 173 keeping it simple 234–235 control reading order 353 <blink> and <marquee> elements title attribute 230–231 reflecting screen structure 354 175–176 using labels as containers removing objects 356–357 guidelines and standards 173–175 233–234 tab index values 354 Section 508 provision 608 when labels don’t work using ActionScript 355–356 flicker rate 228–229 definition 586 testing for Section 508 compliance components 217 embedding 365 415 buttons 217–218 enabling component accessibility focus and frames 200 text input-fields and text areas 359–361 focus rectangles 218–219 increased accessibility of 622 navigation using 206 deaf people’s access to 241 key design concepts 342–343 element 478, 487 enhancements 332–334 control labels 344 font resizing forms design checklist 244 control roles 344 Flash support for 92 grouping form elements 216 control states 345 font-family property 266 inaccessible form example control structure 345 font-style property 266 219–223, 225 keyboard access 357 font-variant property 266 mandatory fields 236 avoiding prevention 358 font-weight property 266 PDF forms 240 keyboard shortcuts 358 for attribute PDFs require accessible progressive disclosure 358–359 <label> element 233, 235, 614 alternatives 541 providing captions 361 forceSimple property 348, 357 placement of prompting text importing captioned content Ford v. Schering-Plough Corporation 225–227 361 522 San José Access Standards placing text on the foreground requirements 58 stage 361–362 contrasting with background 260 Section 508 provision relating providing context 350 form controls to 540 describing movie 350 grouping 216 standards for data input exposing state 351–352 WCAG 1.0 guidelines 215 accessibility 214–216 providing control over audio WCAG 2.0 guidelines 216 validation 333 playback 362 <form> element 481 Forms element providing text equivalents 346 as form component 217 support in assistive technologies assigning for single objects 350 id attribute 614 for PDF elements 378 auto-labeling 349 invisible labels for 280–281 formsgeneration class for entire movie 346–348 Section 508 provision relating Lemos, Manuel 334 making objects inaccessible 348 to 613 <frame> element supporting users with low vision Formal Investigation: The Web: attributes 198 364 Access and Inclusion for title attribute 607–608 technical requirements 340 Disabled People advice to frames 586 Flash Player 6 341 developers 620 focus 200 platform and browser 341 Formatted Text & Graphics style identified as a barrier to screen readers 341–342 PDF Output Style setting 395 accessiblity 58 problems with 201634 INDEXSection 508 provisions relating to Goldstein, Bruce A., and Tucker, H identification 607–608 Bonnie Poitras Hal screen reader 108 support from assistive technology Legal Rights of Persons with introduction 108 198–199 Disabilities: An Analysis of using inaccessible forms 220–222 testing for Section 508 compliance Federal Law 515 using corrected form 223–225 414–415 government web site standards for using prompting text 227 title requirements 196–197 Australia 550 handheld devices workings 197–198 graphs, text equivalents 135 Electronic Signatures in Global and <frameset> element 607 Green Methods homepage National Commerce Act frameset pages 197 accessibility features 185 and 56 France Growing Digital Divide in Access for problems from PDF accessibility laws and policies 559 People with Disabilities: documents 542 implementation status of Overcoming Barriers to Harkin, Tom, U.S. Senator 517 WCAG 1.0 559 Participation hasChildNodes method 307 Freedom Scientific. See JFW Waddell, Cynthia D. 530 <head> element 256 frequency range Guideline for Fostering ICT headers attribute animated GIFs 176 Accessibility of the Senior and associating data cells with flicker as possible cause of Disabled People 569 headings 604 seizures, Section 508 provision guidelines headers/id markup 167–168 608 compared to standards 460–461 heading navigation 184–186 flicker, as possible cause of understanding role of 28–29 Headings element seizures 173–174 guidelines for accessible web support in assistive technologies flicker, testing section 508 development for PDF elements 378 compliance 415 See also IBM Web Accessibility verifying and adding headings in Fresnel lenses Guidelines; Section 508; WCAG tagged PDFs 402 screen magnification and 117 development history 61 hearing impaired people flicker 174–175 forms access by 241 industry codes, recommendations textual transcripts 152 G and good practice 62–63 word-for-word transcripts 131 GAWDS (Guild of Accessible Web introduced 128 Help Desks Designers) layout tables 161–162 Electronic and Information skip navigation links 188 Section 508 66, 130–131 Technology Accessibility Germany statutes and regulations 61–62 Standards. See Section 508 62 accessibility laws and policies text equivalents 151 Home Page Reader 559–560 Section 508 132 support for HTML headings 87 getAttribute attribute WCAG 1.0 131–132 Home Page Reader. See HPR node attributes and methods 308 WCAG 2.0 132–133 Hong Kong getElementById method 326 W3C WAI 63–65 accessibility laws and policies 561 document object 298 WCAG 1.0 128 Hooks v. OKBridge 521–522 getElementsById method WCAG 2.0 129–130 horizontal scrolling document object 306 WCAG priorities 65 Adobe Reader 373 getElementsByTagName method 326 Guidelines for standards developers hot spots document object 304, 306 to address the needs of older client-side image maps 601–602 glossary 582–593 persons and persons with complex shapes, client-side map GNOME Accessibility API disabilities 565 example 204 Adobe Reader delivers Guild of Accessible Web Designers text equivalents 134, 138 information to platform 378 (GAWDS) HPR (IBM Home Page Reader) Gnopernicus project 107 skip navigation links 188 and tables 170–171 go, example of suspicious alt text GW Micro 128 cost and availability 112 409 See also Window-Eyes demonstration version 128 goals of quality asurance 76 female voice indicates links 138 frame support 199 linearization of tables 159635 INDEX meta-text 140 IIA (Internet Industry Association) formatting images 144, 146 performance reading image maps response to Maguire v. SOCOG images that repeat textual 140 548 information 147–148 reading image buttons without alt image buttons inside JavaScript URLs 610 text 144 text equivalents 135, 143 summary of text equivalents reading spacer images 147 image links 151–152 skip navigation links 195 accessible image links 136–138 treatment of images that carry a sub-windows 113 inaccessible image links 137 lot of information 149–151 treatment of href attributes 136 text equivalents 134 used as links 209 using inaccessible forms 220–222 image maps using text equivalents 131 using corrected form 223–225 accessible client-side image maps without information content 135 using prompting text 227 139–140 Images element href attribute 328–329 accessible image map hot spots support in assistive technologies <a> element 136 138 for PDF elements 378 HREOC (Human Rights and Equal client-side image maps 201–202 <img> element Opportunity Commission) complex client-side image maps See also alt-text World Wide Access: Disability 204–205 alt attribute 133, 598, 610 Discrimination Act Advisory guidelines for use 205, 586–587 ismap attribute 203 Notes 549 inaccessible client-side image problems with 270 HTML 586 maps 142 text equivalents provision 133 and accessibility 87–88 possible shapes 202 usemap attribute 134, 139, 601 compared with XHTML 487–488 Section 508 provisions 601 implicit association conversion of PDF problematical server-side image maps 202–204 labels and form controls 615 541 style of alternative text 141 implicit labels 614 <form> elements 217 testing of Section 508 compliance imported style sheets 256–257 human judgment. See judgment 412–413 in-page link human rights text equivalents for hot spots 134, problem with IE 6 193–194 mainstreaming disability 138 inaccessible form example 219–223, concerns 54 image replacement 267–268 225 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity abuse 270–271 inaccessible web design Commission. See HREOC CSS on, images off 268 complaints filed over 56 hyperlinks deprecated techniques 270 costs of 544 creating tagged PDFs in Word 388 <img> elements 270 web designers liability 514–515 San José Access Standars scalable Inman Flash Replacement indentation 264–265 requirements 58 269 InDesign CS2 images creating tagged PDFs 390 adding image equivalents in InFocus 419, 424 I tagged PDFs 402 analyzing files 426–428 IBM (Home Page Reader) as backgrounds 260 choosing tests 424–425 displaying images without alt-text 5 classification 133 examining results 428 example of spacer image use 147 charts and graphs 135 report formats 428 invisible image skip navigation decorative and formatting Information Society in Austria, The links 190 images 135 550 support in assistive technologies image buttons 135 Information Technology Technical for PDF elements 378 image links 134 Assistance and Training tables and default behavior 172 image map hotspots 134 Center. See ITTATC icons combining active images with text inherit value WAVE tool 119 147 available in most properties 258 id attribute creating tagged PDFs in Word inline styles 255 associating data cells with 383–384 Inman, Shaun, and Davidson, Mike headings 604 decorating images 148 scalable Inman Flash Replacement <form> element 614 decorative images 144 (sIFR) 269 <frame> element 198 disabling in IE 119 innerHTML attribute 330–331636 INDEX<input> element IRS (Internal Revenue Service) invoking JavaScript URLs from a src attribute 135 forms 1040 links 610 title attribute 230, 235 online IRS tax filing services 531 reasons for bad reputation value attribute 144 PDF form example 240 293–294 input forms. See forms isActive() method Section 508 provisions relating to input screens Accessibility object 357 610 detecting blank input fields 216 ismap attribute unobtrusive JavaScript 301 insertBefore method 307, 326 <img> element 203 element visibility 321–326 interactivity server-side image maps 412 interactivity 308–311 unobtrusive JavaScript 308–311 Italian Ministerial Decree of July 8, JavaScript as the behavior layer internal standards 2005 302, 304–308 accessibility organization 78–79 Annex E 564 look and feel 311–314 International Disability Rights Italy new windows 314–318, 320–321 Monitor Project Americans accessibility laws and policies outdated techniques and 2004 Report 554 562–565 replacements 326–331 Internet ITTATC (Information Technology use of in accessible websites 37 ADA applicability to 516–517 Technical Assistance and user need 296–297 services provided over 521 Training Center) JAWS Internet applications skip navigation links 191 and tables 171-172 Section 508 provisions 596 IVR (Interactive Voice Response) 533, demonstration version 128 Internet Explorer 543 frame support 199 accessible Flash information introduction to screen reader exposed to 341 109–110 and blind users 107 J <noscript> element 90 displaying alt text 119 J-WAS web accessiblity evaluation reading image buttons without alt in-page link problem with IE 6 tool 566, 568 text 144 193–194 Japan reading news headlines on USDA support for non-mouse interaction accessibility laws and policies 565 homepage 181 88 implementation of WCAG 1.0 skip navigation links 196 Internet Industry Association 566–568 support for HTML headings 87 Maguire v SOCOG 59 JIS X 8341-3 standard 565–566 support in assistive technologies Internet Society language, characters developed for PDF elements 378 comments on the Electronic by HPR 112 use of src attributes 137 Signatures in Global and Java 587 using inaccessible forms 220–222 National Commerce Act 56 and accessibility 99 using corrected form 223, 225 Internet voting 530 JavaScript 587 using prompting text 227 interoperability and accessibility 43 accessibility and 89, 292 Jeff Intranet information accessible forms 331–332 color-blindness use case scenario Section 508 provisions 596 form enhancements 332–334 339 invisible images bad implementation of 294–296 JFW (JAWS for Windows) creating link as alt-text on invisible development of 292–293 See also JAWS image 189–190 guidelines for dynamic JavaScript cost and availablilty 106 Jim Thatcher’s own site 206 297 JIS X 8341-3 standard 565–566 invisible labels breaking conventions 300 Jobs Access with Speech. See JFW <form> elements 280–281 essentail markup should not John IPO (International Program Office) rely on JavaScript 298 blindness use case scenario 339 W3C, WAI and 63 generated HTML 298 JScript Ireland resizing 299 definition 587 accessibility laws and policies separation 300 judgments 561–562 standards not browsers 298 applets and plug-ins 417 irregular data tables 168–169 testing 300 client-side image maps 413 visitor and user agent color coding 411 restrictions 299 complex tables 414637 INDEX contrasted with algorithmic testing labeling <form> elements spanning cells 160–161 408 Section 508 provision relating to WCAG on linearization 161 flicker rate 415 613 legal requirements 54 frames 415 lang attribute analysis of Federal law 515 online forms 418 language of alternate text development history 61 redundant text links 413 specified by 15 hot topics for web developers and role in accessibility testing 408 language policymakers 539 scripting 416 natural language provision electronic forms 540 skip navigation 418 distinction between Section 508 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking style sheets 412 and WCAG 537 540 synchronized multimedia 411 problems with Japanese characters links to inaccessible off-site table headers 414 566–567 content 543 text equivalents 410 large displays 117 staff for accessibility organization text-only pages 416 law and guidelines 78 timed responses 419 See also legal requirements statutes and regulations 61–62 jump menus complaints filed due to summary of accessibility policies initial fix on university website 484 inaccessible web design 56 required 543 worst use of 482 ADA v. City of San José 56–58 U.S. disability rights legislation 512 Maguire v. SOCOG 58–61 Legal Rights of Person with development of for accessible web Disabilities: An Analysis K design 61 of Federal Law Karen industry codes, Bonnie Poitras Tucker and Bruce deafness use case scenario 340 recommendations and good A. Goldstein 515 keyboard access practice 62–63 <legend> element Flash support for 92 Section 508 66 using for sets of controls 231, 233 support for JavaScript 91 statutes and regulations 61–62 Lemos, Manuel keyboard navigation W3C WAI 63–65 formsgeneration class 334 compared to mouse navigation WCAG priorities 65 Lessig, Lawrence 180 evolution of public policy 54 Code and Other Laws of importance for users 181 introduction 54 Cyberspace 512 WCAG 1.0 hardly addressed 184 problem outlined 55–56 letter and word spacing 266–267 keyboard support layered data tables letter-spacing property 266–267 Swing components 99 headers/id markup 167–168 LIFT Machine 419, 429 keyboard users Section 508 provision 166 analyzing files 430–431 problems with original university layout and positioning 271 choosing tests 429–430 website 481 bullet style lists 281 examining results 432 King County website centered elastic-width column report formats 433 server-side image maps 203–204 272–273 linearization 105 Korea empty table cells 282 definition 587 accessibility laws and policies 569 heading, footer, and two liquid how tables linearize 158–159 columns 276–278 improving with layout changes 206 important of consistency when simple data tables 165–166 L using screen magnifiers 117 tools for checking 162 Label improving navigation 206 <link> element 257 enabling accessibility 360 invisible labels for <form> media attribute 286 <label> element elements 280–281 rel attribute 282 best practices for accessible forms navigation and 205–206 title attribute 282 227 navigation design 279–280 link navigation 206–207 for attribute 233, 235, 614 table-free layouts 496 link text 207–209 using as container 233–234 three columns using absolute link text 207–209 labeling of forms positioning 273–275 See also alt-text WCAG 2.0 guidelines 216 layout tables 158 alternative text on image links 206 guidelines and standards 161–162 linked style sheets 256–257 linearization 158–159638 INDEX links MAGpie (Media Access MSAA (Microsoft Active Accessibility) See also skip navigation Generator) 542 Adobe Reader delivers examples of poor practice 208 Maguire v. SOCOG information to platform 378 images used as 209 complaint over inaccessible web definition 588 inaccessible off-site content, design 58–59 detecting blank input screens 216 law and 543 direct discrimination 59 IE effectiveness with screen need for skipping over 184 example of liability that occurred readers and 107 Links element outside the U.S. 62 Shortcut field announces shortcut support in assistive technologies IIA response 548 value via 358 for PDF elements 378 maintenance time using with Flash Player 342 liquid columns 276–278 accessibility and 43 MSAA Application Mode List Box Makoto Window-Eyes 110–111 enabling accessibility 361 mobility impairment use case MTIC (Mission pour les Technologies lists scenario 340 de l’Information et de la bullet style 281 mandatory class 334 Communication) 559 creating tagged PDFs in Word 388 <map> element multimedia 588 Lists element adding alt text 142 providing text information for 131 support in assistive technologies client-side image maps 601 Section 508 542–543 for PDF elements 378 positioning of 139 multimedia presentations local government margin property 265 accesibility challenges 543 Section 508 effects 66, 539 margins 264–265 Section 508 provision 599 local government and state websites <marquee> element synchronizing alternatives 599 accessibility of 517–518 possible cause of flicker 175 testing for Section 508 compliance longdesc attribute Martin v. Metropolitan Atlanta 411 testing for section 508 compliance Transportation Authority 519 myths surrounding accessibility 514 409 McAleese, Mary look and feel Excellence through Accessibility unobtrusive JavaScript 311–314 Award program 561 N low literacy levels measurability name attribute Web accessibility 10 concern with WCAG 2.0 469 <frame> element 198–199 low-bandwidth connections media attribute name property 348, 350 Web accessibility 10 <link> element 286 National Center for Accessible luminosity contrast 156 media types 287 Media. See NCAM Luxembourg meta-text National Disability Authority (NDA) accessibility laws and policies 569 generated by HPR 140 561 Lynx browser 587 Microsoft Active Accessibility. National Federation of the Blind. frame support 198 See MSAA See NFA investigating table linearization Mission pour les Technologies natural language provisions using 162 de l’Information et de la distinction between Section 508 Lynx Viewer 162 Communication (MTIC) 599 and WCAG 537 investigating page linearization missing text navigation 180 using 114–115 adding in tagged PDFs 401–402 accessible frames 196–201 mobility impairment accessible image maps 201–205 use case scenario 340 accessible links 206–210 M monitoring considerations 180–181 M.S. Local District Information quality asurance 76 design 279–280 website monochrome displays heading navigation 184–186 client-side map example 204 color contrast and 154–155 improving with layout changes 206 Mac OS X Moore, Donald L. initial fix on university website 484 Adobe Reader version available concerns for deaf people 241 keyboard-compatibility with other for 378 mouse navigation application commands 112 Macromedia Flash MX compared to keyboard navigation layout and navigation 205–206 first accessible version of Flash 180 placing of controls 117 platform 341639 INDEX problems on original university non-textual web content online forms. See forms website 478, 481–484 audio files 152 online guide to Section 508 130 reading order 181–183 classification of images 133–135 Online Reception page skip navigation links 186 providing text information for 131 initial fix on university website 484 creating 186–194 Section 508 provision 597–599 problems with original university Section 508 provision 615 testing Section 508 compliance website 482 skipping text blocks with 409–410 online resources assistive technologies 194–196 Norway Access Board’s Section 508 navigation controls accessibility laws and policies standards and online HPR (IBM Home Page Reader) 114 573–574 guide 130 JAWS for Windows 109 noscript directive 327–329 ADA 513 Window-Eyes 110 <noscript> element 90 assistive technology products 128 navigator.userAgent 329 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 540 California OCR Letters of NCAM Accessibility QA Favelet 121 null alt-text Resolution 523 NDA (National Disability Authority) example of suspicious alt text 409 Maguire v. SOCOG 59–60 561 uninformative images 144 U.S. Department of Education nested tables and linearization 160 report on the San José Netherlands complaint 57 accessibility laws and policies 570 O U.S. disability rights legislation 512 new windows <object> elements WCAG checkpoints 65, 461 unobtrusive JavaScript 314–318, detecting plug-ins 612 online voting 320–321 object models ADA accessibility web complaints New Zealand use by screen readers 104 530 accessibility laws and policies objects as non-text elements 132 Opera browser 571–573 OCR (Office of Civil Rights, U.S. headings navigation from the next text jumps Department of Education) keyboard 186 skip navigation and 195 ADA web accessibility complaints turning off animation 174 nextSibling attribute 514, 523–524 support for non-mouse node tree navigation 307 compliance review, California interaction 88 NFB (National Federation of the Community Colleges 525 <optgroup> element 482 Blind) OCR Letter of Resolution <option> element 481 National Federation of the Blind v. Docket No. 09-95-2206 523 Order tab America Online 527–528 Docket No. 09-97-2002 523 correcting reading order issues online IRS tax filing services and Docket No. 09-97-6001 525 400–401 531 ODEP (Office of Disability Ordinance on Barrier-Free node attributes and methods 307 Employment Policy) Information Technology). node tree navigation website illustrating skipping over See BITV 560 attributes 307 navigation links 616 OSM (Off-Screen Model) 104 nodeName attribute Off-Screen Model. See OSM outcome-based node attributes and methods 307 Office for Civil Rights. See OCR definition 588 nodeType attribute OKBridge website 521–522 outdated techniques and node attributes and methods 308 older people and Web accessibility 9 replacements nodeValue attribute older technology and Web unobtrusive JavaScript 326–331 node attributes and methods 308 accessibility 10 OutSpoken screen reader 107 non-linear formats on screen keyboard 588 overflow-auto rule 278 identified as a barrier to on*event handlers 611 accessiblity 58 onchange event non-text elements <select> element 481 P See also multimedia onclick attribute 328–329 page layout 271 definition 598 onclick=void 329 bullet style lists 281 programming objects as 132 online forms centered elastic-width column WCAG classification of 132 testing for Section 508 compliance 272–273 417 heading, footer, and two liquid columns 276–278640 INDEX invisible labels for <form> making scanned documents Productivity Works elements 280–281 accessible 395 pwWebSpeak browser 112 navigation design 279–280 need for plug-ins 612 programmatically determined three columns using absolute support in assistive technologies definition 589 positioning 273–275 for PDF elements 378 progressive disclosure 358–359 using tables to format 466–468 tagged PDFs 379–380 Project Civic Access 532 page refreshes 244 creating in InDesign CS2 projection, screen magnification by page templates 490 390–391 117 adding content 497–499 creating in Word 380–389 prompting text planning page structure 491–493 World Wide Access: Disability labels for <form> elements 215 styling the template 494–497 Discrimination Act Advisory placement for accessible forms Paged navigation element Notes 549 224–227 support in assistive technologies PFWG (Protocols and Formats Protocols and Formats Working for PDF elements 378 Working Group) 16 Group (PFWG) 16 <par> element 94 Phark technique public policy, evolution of parentNode attribute Rundle, Mike 268 disability and access 54 node tree navigation 307 photosensitive epilepsy 608 public representation Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance place of public accommodation accessibility organization 80 Company 522 disputed ADA definition 522 Publicly Available Specification. PAS 78 (Guide to Good Practice in planning See PAS Commissioning Accessible implementing accessibility pwWebSpeak voice browser 112 Websites) 620 organization 82 background 620–621 incorporating accessibility issues at definition 588 design phase 79 Q DRC endorsement of 624 plug-ins 588 quality asurance guidance contained 622–623 definition 588 goals 76 impact of 623 detectable by presence of monitoring 76 legal impact of 624 <object> elements 612 reviews 77 what it is not 622 Section 508 provisions 541, 612 Quality Mark drempelvrij.nl 570 PC Magazine Top 100 sites policymakers Questions about Electronic Signature survey of missing alt text 151 legal hot topics 539 Bill: Will Everyone Be Able to PDF (Portable Document Format) electronic forms 540 Participate? 240, 589 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Internet Society Press Release, accessibility 93, 368 540 The 56 accessibility repair and Portable Document Format. See PDF QuickTime and accessibility 96–97 optimization 391 Portugal Acrobats accessibility checker accessibility laws and policies 404 574–575 R correcting tagging issues positional information Radio Button 395–403 role of 138 enabling accessibility 360 dealing with untagged positioning Ramp Ascend 419, 434 documents 391–394 See also layout and positioning analyzing files 435 making scanned documents 271 choosing tests 434 accessible 394 identifying table headers using 173 examining results 435–437 accessible PDF forms 404 <pre> element report formats 437 complaint over inaccessible web inappropriate use 602 RampWEB toolbar 122 design 57 Preferences dialog box Read Out Loud feature documents require accessible Accessibility section 368 Adobe Reader 375–376 alternatives 541 previousSibling attribute readability of content 464 forms require accessible node tree navigation 307 readily achievable alternatives 541 printing pages meaning of, in Section 255 533 identified as a barrier to problems in original university reading order 181–183 accessiblity 58 website 479 creating tagged PDFs in Word 389 increased accessibility of 622 verifying and repairing in tagged PDFs 396–401 641 INDEXReal Audio removeChild method 307 screen readers 104, 590 need for plug-ins 612 replaceChild method 307 dealing with forms 230 real time captioning 543 resizing documents Hal screen reader 108 RealPlayer Adobe Reader 372 inability to read PDF files 57 and accessibility 96–97 retrofitting case study. JAWS for Windows 109–110 setting accessibility settings in See redesigning university read tables cell-by-cell 159, 161 Preferences pane 94 website searching for image information Recruiting Participants with return false statement 317 136 Disabilities 22 return statement 298 specific screen readers 106–107 redesigning university website 476 reviews and quality asurance 77 support for JavaScript 90 decisions in early planning stages revolutionary nature of WCAG 2.0 tabbing through active elements 486 469 143 tables, moving away from right-click prevention scripts 295 treatment of image buttons 143 488–489 Robotron Braille reader 105 user experience of ACB site 187 web standards 486 <root-layout> element 94 Window-Eyes 110–111 XHTML rather than HTML rounded edges, problems with 476, working with web pages 104–105 487–488 479–481 scripting dynamic pages 499–500 row headers See also JavaScript evaluation 504–506 Section 508 provisions 602–604, Section 508 provisions relating to implementation of new design 507 606–607 displaying content 610–612 original site 476 Rundle, Mike testing for Section 508 initial fixes 484–485 Phark technique 268 compliance 416 problems 476, 478–484 search engine optimization 44–45 page templates 490 Searchable Image style adding content 497–499 S PDF Output Style setting 395 planning page structure Safari Section 255 491–493 support for non-mouse readily achievable, meaning of 533 styling the template 494–497 interaction 88 Telecommunications Act 1996 533 redesign 485–486 SAMI (Synchronized Accessible Section 504 site structure Media Interchange) 590 Rehabilitation Act 1973 539 taking stock 489–490 San José, California Section 508 590 success of redesigning 501–504 ADA complaint over inaccessible accessible technology plans testing and site launch 500–501 web design 56–58 required 524, 526 redirections Web Page Disability Access Design adopted by other countries 548 timed responses and 244 Standard 58 and WCAG 472, 538 Redpath, Chris savings due to accessibility 46 applets and plugins 541, 612 accessibility testing 446 scalable Inman Flash Replacement client-side compared to server- redundant text links (sIFR) side maps 203 server-side maps and 203 Inman, Shaun, and Davidson, Mike color use to convey information testing for Section 508 compliance 269 154 412 scope commercial incentives and legal refreshable Braille 105 definition 589 liabilities 535 definition 589 scope attribute complex data table headers 165 Rehabilitation Act 1973 id and headers attributes as compliance reviews required by Section 501 66 alternatives 604 535–536 Section 504 66, 512–513, 539 Section 508 provisions relating to data input accessibility 214 Section 508 512, 534–535 use in tables 603–604 data tables and row and column rel attribute <th> element 165 headers 602–604, 606–607 <link> element 282 work schedule example 603, 606 effects on State and local Relationship Between Accessibility scoping 470 government 66, 539 and Usability, The 28 screen magnification 116–117 frames identification and remediation arguments definition 589 navigation 607–608 Maguire v. SOCOG 60 Fresnel lenses 117 frames provision 196 removeAttribute method 307 guide to the standards 536642 INDEX historical context 62 understanding role of skipping text blocks with assistive implementation of 537 guidelines 28 technologies 194 information conveyed with color undue burden of compliance 535 Home Page Reader 195 261 viewed as the ADA of Cyberspace JAWS 196 information, documentation and 534–535 Window Eyes 195 support standards 537 WCAG guidelines and 130, 537 text links styled to be invisible Intranet and Internet information web developers following 538–539 190–191 and applications 596–599 Section 508 Toolbar 123 testing for Section 508 compliance introduction to 66, 130 <select> element 481, 484 418 keyboard navigation 185 onchange event 481 SMIL (Synchronized Multimedia layered data tables 166–168 Selecting Web Accessibility Integration Language) 86, 590 multimedia presentations and Evaluation Tools 40 and accessibility 93–94, 96 synchronization of equivalent SENDA (Special Educational Needs sniff tests 124 alternatives 599 and Disability Act 2001) 476 Snook, Jonathan multimedia, audio broadcasts and legal requirements for university Color Contrast Checker 260 captioning 542–543 website 486 SOCOG (Sydney Organising online electronic forms 613–615 Senior Citizen Portal 576 Committee for the provision for information separation of content and Olympic Games) conveyed with color 599 presentation complaint over inaccessible web provision of client-side image problems on original university design 58–59 maps 601–602 website 478 spacers provision of text links for server- server load and accessibility 43 example of suspicious alt text 409 side image maps 601 server-side image maps 202–204 spacer images 590 readability of documents without Section 508 provisions 601 text equivalents 144–145 associated style sheets 600 testing of Section 508 compliance spaces scope of 534 412 letter and word spacing 266–267 scripting used to display content setAttribute method 304, 306 Spain 610–612 shape attribute accessibility laws and policies 577 simple data table headers 165–166 <area> element 202 speaking order 181 skipping navigation links 615 shortcut property 358 Special Educational Needs and standards, impact on the ADA 516 sIFR (scalable Inman Flash Disability Act 2001 578 style sheet provisions 253 Replacement) speech synthesizers 104 technical standards 536 Inman, Shaun, and Davidson, Mike Spitzer, Eliot (Attorney General) testing for compliance 408 269 settlements with travel websites applets and plug-ins 417 silent property 348–349, 356, 359 532 client-side image maps 413 Simple Button src attribute color coding 411 enabling accessibility 360 <input> element 135 complex tables 414 simulated site navigation 295 JAWS inspects when no atl text is flicker rate 415 Singapore found 137 frames 414 accessibility laws and policies 576 Standard Rules on the Equalization of online forms 417 site development and accessibility 43 Opportunities for People with redundant text links 412 site launch of redesigned university Disabilities 55 scripting 416 website 500–501 standards skip navigation 418 site structure, taking stock 489–490 accessibility organization 78–79 style sheets 412 sizing of text 262–264 compared to guidelines 460–461 synchronized multimedia 410 skip navigation links 184, 206 state and local government websites table headers 413–414 exposing link when it receives accessibility of 517–518 text equivalents 409–410 focus 191–193 State government text-only pages 415–416 in-page link problem with IE 6 Section 508 effects 66, 539 timed responses 418 193–194 state of federal accessiblitiy text equivalents 132 links as alt-text on invisible image USDOJ report on 535–536 audio files 152 188–190 status line, browsers 611 text-only pages 609 links in normal text 187–188 structural markup timed responses 242, 617 avoiding inside layout tables 162643 INDEX structure T verifying and adding 402 creating tagged PDFs in Word 384 TAB key verifying and repairing tables students mouseless navigation 206 403 complaints about accessibility to tabindex attribute creating in Word 380, 382 disabled students 523, 526 screen reader support 107 color contrast 389 <style> element tabIndex property 355 hyperlinks 388 @import rule 257 <table> element images 383–384 CSS rules enclosed in 256 summary attribute 607 lists 388 type attribute 256 table headers reading order 389 style guides 590 testing for Section 508 compliance structure 384 developing 79 413–414 tables 386–388 style sheets table linearization. See linearization introduction 379–380 See also CSS; XSL table reading order talking ATMs. See ATMs and Section 508 problems with spanned rows 182 talking browsers 112, 114 browsers use of default style table-free layouts 496 tax fraud 531 sheets 259 tables <td> element embedded 256 See also data tables; layout tables using th instead for header cells linked and imported 256–257 accessibility advantages of frames 165 testing for Section 508 compliance compared with 198 TDD (Telecommunications Device for 412 and default behavior of assistive theDeaf) 241 user created 257–258 technology 172 technical specifications 12 submit button and HPR 170–171 techniques documents lack of in original university and JAWS 171 WCAG 2.0 466 website 481 and Window-Eyes 171–172 technology success criteria 464–465, 590 creating accessible tables 158–173 See also accesible technologies summary attribute creating tagged PDFs in Word older technology and Web <caption> element 170 386–388 accessibility 10 <table> element 607 data tables 163–169 preparing for advanced Sun and accessibility 99 empty table cells 282 technology 44 support requirements 62 layout tables 158–163 Telecommunication Accessiblity accessibility organization 77–78 modifying layout tables to Panel, Japan 566 suspicious alt text 409 improve navigation 206 Telecommunications Act 1996 See also Click Here moving away from 488–489 Section 255 512, 533 SVG (Scaleable Vector Graphics) 589 reading in HPR 114 telephone information and accessibility 97–98 screen readers read cell-by-cell supplied by deaf people 241 Sweden 159, 161 test suite accessibility laws and policies 577 using id and headers attributes introduction 446–454 Swing components 604, 606–607 results 454–456 keyboard support 99 using to format a page 466–468 testable statements 464–465 <switch> element 95 verifying and repairing in tagged testing accessibility 408 Sydney Organising Committee for PDFs 403 See also accessibility checking the Olympic Games (SOCOG) Tables element software complaint over inaccessible web support in assistive technologies browser settings for testing pages design 58–59 for PDF elements 378 119, 121 Synchronized Accessible Media tables, complex compliance with Section 508 Interchange (SAMI) 590 testing for Section 508 compliance provisions 408 synchronized multimedia 414 applets and plug-ins 417 Section 508 provision 599, tagged forms client-side image maps 413 542–543 Adobe Acrobat 5 241 color coding 411 testing for Section 508 compliance tagged PDFs complex tables 414 410 correcting issues 395–396 flicker rate 415 Synchronized Multimedia Integration adding image equivalents 402 frames 414 Language. See SMIL adding missing text 401–402 online forms 417 reading order 396–401 redundant text links 412644 INDEX scripting 416 judging the quality of 410 <frame> element 198–199, skip navigation 418 non-textual web content 607–608 style sheets 412 Section 508 provision relating <input> element 230, 235 synchronized multimedia 410 to 542–543 <link> element 282 table headers 413–414 Section 508 provision 597–599 using with fieldset/legend text equivalents 409–410 spacer images 144–145 construct 233 text-only pages 415–416 summary of for images 151–152 <title> element timed responses 418 testing Section 508 compliance use of in frame pages 199 HPR easiest assistive technology 409–410 titles for 114 using for images 131 frames requirements 196 redesigned university website text input–fields TOEWEB (Toegankelijke Websites) 500–501 as form components 218–219 accessible websites 553 Redpath, Chris 446 text links tool developers 13 toolbars and favelets 121 server-side image maps 601 responsibilities for alt-text 15 NCAM Accessibility QA Favelet styled to be invisible 190–191 ToolTip text 121 testing for Section 508 compliance making longer than alt text 141 Section 508 Toolbar 122–123 412 TouchUp Reading Order tool Web Accessibility Toolbar 122 text only versions adding headings 402 using text views 113 acceptability 33–35 adding image equivalents 403 using the Lynx browser 115 text views correcting reading order issues using visual browsers 117 pasting text into word processors 398 websites that analyze pages and editors 110 caveats 400 118–119 using to test accessibility 113 training for accessibility awareness 74 text text-align-center rule 278 transcripts 152 applying to elements 598 text-indent property 265 audio files 153 direction 267 text-only browsers 591 hearing impaired people 131 font-family property 266 text-only pages judging the quality of 410 letter and word spacing 266–267 Section 508 provisions 609 San José Access Standards letter case 267 testing for compliance 415–416 require 58 margins and indentation 264–265 <textarea> element 499–500 travel websites settlement sizing 262–264 <textstream> element 94 agreements 532–533 text areas as form components <th> element Treviranus, Jutta 554 218–219 formatting within tables 162 Maguire v. SOCOG expert text browsers, scope attribute 165 witness 61 See also Lynx browser Thailand TTA (Telecommunications San José Access Standars accessibility laws and policies 577 Technology Association) require support for 58 Thatcher, Jim Web Contents Accessibility text colors 259 website, layout forcing improved Guidelines 1.0 569 Text element linearization 206 Tucker, Bonnie Poitras and Goldstein, support in assistive technologies Thrift Savings Plan Bruce A. for PDF elements 378 website illustrating compliance Legal Rights of Persons with text equivalents 591 over timed responses 617 Disabilities: An Analysis of See also transcripts timed responses 242 Federal Law 515 audio 152 automatic page refreshes as 244 Tyler v. City of Manhattan 524 client-side image maps 139–140 Section 508 provision relating to Type and Colour decorative images 148 617 Clark, Joe 260 formatting images 146 testing for Section 508 compliance type attribute guidelines and standards 131–133 418 <style> element 256 image buttons 143 timeliness of delivery image links 136–138 ADA requirement 517, 524 image map hot spots 138 timeouts 243 images that repeat textual title attribute information 147–148 <a> element 610 best practices 230–231645 INDEXU report on the state of federal innerHTML attribute 330–331 UAAG (User Agent Accessibility accessiblitiy 535–536 noscript directive 327 Guidelines) 65, 591 ruling on ADA applicability to the onclick=void 329 guidelines on components of web Internet 516–517 UPDATE statements 499 accessibility 18 stresses need for accessibility updating introduction 20 organization 70–71 Section 508 provisions relating to UCD (User Centered Design) 592 view on developers’ liaibilities 515 text-only versions 609 UK Government United States Department of Labor URLs. See online resources accesskeys standard 493 ODEP (Office of Disability usability 591 undue burden Employment Policy) 616 relationship to accessibility 26–28 meaning in Section 508 and the United States Department of Usability Testing for Accessibility 26 ADA 66 Transportation USDOJ Project Civic Access 532 OCR opinion on 524 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking use case scenarios Section 508 legal liability 535 540 blindness 339 unicode-bidi property 267 United States Federal Access Board. color-blindness 339 United Kingdom See Section 508 deafness 340 accessibility laws and United States General Accounting mobility impairment 340 policies 578–579 Office visual impairement 339 United Nations report on voters with disabilities usemap attribute Commitment to Advancement of 530 client-side image maps 201–202 the Status of Persons with United States Senate website <img> element 134, 139, 601 Disabilities 54 using client-side image maps 201 user agent 13, 591 Standard Rules on the Equalization universal access 591 alt-text 15 of Opportunities for People universal design 591 User Agent Accessibility Guidelines. with Disabilities 55 universities and complaints about See UAAG World Programme of Action accessibility 523 user interfaces concerning Disabled University of Arizona website Lynx browser 115 Persons 54 image map hot spots 139 user style sheets 257–258 United States UNIX user-defined stylesheets alternative to implementing Adobe Reader version available Section 508 provision 600 WCAG 1.0 66 for 378 users 13 United States Attorney General screen reader availability 107 new Web users and Web report on the state of federal unjustifiable hardship arguments accessibility 11 accessiblitiy 536 Maguire v. SOCOG 60 responsibilities for alt-text 15 United States Department of unobtrusive JavaScript 301 Using Combined Expertise to Agriculture interactivity 308–311 Evaluate Web Accessibility 40 accessing homepage via mouse or JavaScript as the behavior layer keyboard 180 302, 304–308 Target Center website illustrating look and feel 311–314 V skipping over navigation new windows 314 value attribute links 616 element visibility 321–326 <input> element 144 United States Department of guidelines for opening 315–317 visible property 356 Commerce reusable pop-up script 317–318, <page> elements 322 digital divide report 55 320–321 visibility: hidden property United States Department of outdated techniques and treatment of by screen readers 89 Education replacements 326 visually impaired users 296 See also OCR document.all, document.layers, color vision problems 154–155 report on the San José and navigator.userAgent 329 use case scenario 339 complaint 57 document.write 326 voice changes United States Department of Justice functions with a lot of reading links on HPR 138 ADA homepage 513 parameters 329 voice input 592 recommendations on PDF href="javascript: . . ." and voice output 592 documents 541 onclick="javascript:" 328–329 voice recognition software 592646 INDEX voice-browsers 112 WaSP (Web Standards Project) 486, luminosity contrast 156 VoiceXML 592 593 organization 461–462 voicing browser 592 WaSP ATF (Web Standards Group principles and guidelines Accessibility Task Force) 80 462–462 WAT-C (Web Accessibility Tools success criteria 464–465 W Consortium) 593 techniques documents 466 W-E See Window-Eyes WAVE tool U.S. Access Board and 537 W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) highlighting reading order 183 use of contrast 156 593 icons 119 W3C WCAG not accepted as discussion of CSS accessibility WCAG (Web Content Accessibility authority on accessibility 520 features 89 Guidelines) 593 Web accessibility SMIL (Synchronized Multimedia adopted by other countries 548 alt-text example 4–6 Integration Language) 86 and Section 508 472, 538 approaches 20 SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) 97 checkpoints not adopted in accessability and usability 26–28 W3C WCAG not accepted as Section 508 537 accessibility barriers 29–32 authority on accessibility 520 client-side compared to server- involving disabled people 22, 41 WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative) side maps 203 learning from disabled launch of press release 63–65 color use to convey information people 25 support for guidelines 621 154 recruiting disabled people XHTML + MathML + SVG complex data table headers 165 22–25 Profile 87 deaf people supplying telephone understanding role of W3C Working Groups information 241 guidelines 28–29 guidelines on components of web flicker 174 understanding the issues 21 accessibility 18 forms accessibility 215–216 benefits from business Waddell, Cynthia D frames title requirements 196 perspective 42 digital divide report 55, 530 guidelines on components of web financial benefits 44–47 discussion of NFB v. AOL case 528 accessibility 18 technical benefits 42–44 Growing Digital Divide in Access introduction 19 call to action 47–49 for People with Disabilities: keyboard navigation 184 equal opportunities 7–8 Overcoming Barriers to layout table linearization 161 harmful myths 32 Participation 530 Maguire v. SOCOG and 60 accessibility as sole WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative) 593 online IRS tax filing services and responsibility of Web See also WCAG 531 developers 39 alternative website versions not prioritization of checkpoints accessibility is for blind needed 514 explained 65 people 39 Authoring Tools Accessiblity Section 508 and 537 accessibility means dull and Guidelines 65 simple data table headers 165–166 boring 35, 37–38 Evaluation and Repair Tools style sheet provisions 253 accessibility means expensive working group 419 support for scripting in 2.0 292 and hard 38–39 guidelines for implementing text equivalents evaluation tools 40–42 alt-text 15 audio files 153 text-only versions 33, 35 guidelines on components of web WCAG 1.0 131–132 interdependent components accessibility 18 WCAG 2.0 132–133 11–12 link text clarity 207 timed responses 243 accessibility in implementation User Agent Accessiblity understanding role of cycle 16 Guidelines 65 guidelines 28–29 ATAG (Authoring Tools W3C launch press release 63–65 version 1.0 128 Accessibility Guidelines) 19 W3C support for guidelines 621 use of tables 488 bringing components website as dull and boring before version 2.0 129–130 together 18 redesign 36–37 advantages 468 compensating for weak Wall-On-Line Project 553 concerns 469–471 accessibility support 17 Wallooon government example of using 466–468 description of components Wall-On-Line Project 553 guidelines 460–461 12–13, 15 introduction 460647 INDEXUAAG (User Agent Accessibility Web Standards Project. See WaSP Windows Media Player Guidelines) 20 web-based technology and accessibility 96–97 WCAG (Web Content buying coordinated with AO 77 Windows XP Magnifier 116 Accessiblity Guidelines) 19 WebAIM Wonder, Stevie low literacy and lack of fluency in accessibility training 74 inaccessibility of Flash website 339 language 10 WebKing 419, 437 Word, creating tagged PDFs 380 low-bandwidth connections and analyzing files 439–440 word spacing 266–267 older technology 10 choosing tests 438 word-spacing property 266–267 new Web users 11 examining results 440 work schedule example older people 9 report formats 440 use of id and headers attributes other examples 6–7 website ballots 530 604 understanding 2–3 websites use of scope attribute 603, 606 Web accessibility evaluation tools, See also online resources; World Wide Access: Disability overview 40 Web accessibility Discrimination Act Web Accessibility Initiative alternative versions not usually Advisory Notes Checkpoints needed 514 Australian web developers limitations of 621 and tax fraud 531 should be familiar with 549 Web Accessibility Toolbar 122 and USDOJ Project Civic Access Worthington, Tom Web Accessibility Tools Consortium. 532 Maguire v. SOCOG expert See WAT-C increased use due to accessibility witness 60 Web content 12 45–46 WPA (UN World Programme of web design travel websites settlement Action concerning accessibility problems outlined agreements 532–533 Disabled Persons) 54 55–56 using to analyze pages 118–119 write method addressing accessibility early in WebXM 419 document object 326 web design 61 analyzing files 443 approaches to Section 508 choosing tests 442 compliance 537 examining results 444–445 X complaints filed due to report formats 445 X-Windows inaccessibility 56 Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film screen reader availability 107 deciding between Section 508 and Corp 522 XHTML (Extensible HTML) WCAG 538–539 Window and accessibility 87–88 design principles of WCAG 2.0 enabling accessibility 361 definition 585 462–464 Window-Eyes extending 87 importance of accessibility and tables 171–172 using rather than HTML 487–488 legislation and standards 54 demonstration version 128 XML (Extensible Markup Language) legal hot topics 539 description 106 585 electronic forms 540 frames support 199 and accessibility 99–100 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking performance with image maps 140 definition 585 540 reading image buttons without alt XSL (Extensible Stylesheet Language) liability for inaccessible web text 144 585 design 514–515 skip navigation links 195 and accessibility 99–100 role in USDOJ’s ADA applicability support for HTML headings 87 definition 585 ruling 517 support in assistive technologies XSS (cross-server-scripting) Web Page Disability Access Design for PDF elements 378 exploiting problems with browser Standard techniques for using web mode security 294 City of San José, California 58 110–111 web pages treatment of href attributes 137 live analysis 118 using inaccessible forms 220–222 Z using with screen readers 104–105 using corrected form 223–225 zooming feature web standards using prompting text 227 Adobe Reader 372 benefits 486 window.alert method 331 Web Standards Group Accessibility window.location.href directive 328 Task Force. See WaSP ATF648 </div> </article> </div> </div> </div> <script type="text/javascript" async crossorigin="anonymous" src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-8519364510543070"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.1/jquery.min.js" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script> <script> var docId = 'a19fad3b76da3a86b74fbaf6cb42341f'; var endPage = 1; var totalPage = 64; var pfLoading = false; window.addEventListener('scroll', function () { if (pfLoading) return; var $now = $('.article-imgview .pf').eq(endPage - 1); if (document.documentElement.scrollTop + $(window).height() > $now.offset().top) { pfLoading = true; endPage++; if (endPage > totalPage) return; var imgEle = new Image(); var imgsrc = "//data.docslib.org/img/a19fad3b76da3a86b74fbaf6cb42341f-" + endPage + (endPage > 3 ? ".jpg" : ".webp"); imgEle.src = imgsrc; var $imgLoad = $('<div class="pf" id="pf' + endPage + '"><img src="/loading.gif"></div>'); $('.article-imgview').append($imgLoad); imgEle.addEventListener('load', function () { $imgLoad.find('img').attr('src', imgsrc); pfLoading = false }); if (endPage < 7) { adcall('pf' + endPage); } } }, { passive: true }); </script> <script> var sc_project = 11552861; var sc_invisible = 1; var sc_security = "b956b151"; </script> <script src="https://www.statcounter.com/counter/counter.js" async></script> </html>