Some Dam – Hydro Newstm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some Dam – Hydro Newstm 11/02/2012 Some Dam – Hydro News TM And Other Stuff i Quote of Note: “Life is half spent before we know what it is.” - George Herbert “Good wine is a necessity of life.” - -Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: 2009 Waterstone, Napa Valley, Cabernet Sauvignon “No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap.” - - Thomas Jefferson Dams: (This dam removal battle rages on and now it’s getting very political!) Vann hits feds on removing Yuba River dams October 19, 2012 , By Ben van der Meer, appeal-democrat.com The fate of Englebright and Daguerre Point dams is entering the 3rd Congressional District race as an issue, after Republican challenger Kim Vann joined criticism of a federal study suggesting they be removed. Vann, a Colusa County supervisor who is trying to unseat US Rep. John Garamendi, said the opinion by the National Marine Fisheries Service doesn't look at the whole picture. "The agencies are not working together, and they're not communicating with each other," said Vann. Englebright and Daguerre Point, in the early stages of relicensing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, are operated by the US Army Corps of Engineers. But the Fisheries Service biological opinion, released in February as part of the relicensing process, suggested the dams be removed to aid recovery for three endangered fish species native to the Yuba. Environmental groups, such as the South Yuba River Citizens' League, have concurred in those opinions, saying the dams' initial purpose for flood and debris control no longer applies because of improvements elsewhere. "It is well known that the upper Yuba River is one of the best places to restore these threatened species, which is why the Biological Opinion calls for fish passage above the Army Corps' dams," said the Citizen League's executive director, Caleb Dardick, in an email. Vann said such opinions fly in the face of reality, with mercury, a holdover from the river's mining days, likely to cause widespread harm if the dams are removed. "When you add in the other environmental concerns, it shows you need to look at the issue in total," she said. Garamendi, D- Walnut Grove, was unavailable for comment Friday. Earlier this month, a scheduling conflict 1 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu prevented Vann from touring the dam with US Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee. But Vann said she still believes she can push the issue if elected. Her concern follows that of retiring US Rep. Wally Herger, who sent acting US Commerce Secretary Rebecca Blank a letter last month requesting intervention in the issue. The Fisheries Services is part of the Department of Commerce. "I also noted in my letter that the opinion is rife with factual errors and unsupported conclusions; calls upon the Corps to take actions that are not technically feasible; requires them to meet a schedule that is clearly not achievable; and calls for numerous actions that are neither legally authorized nor funded," Herger, R-Chico, wrote in the Sept. 5 letter. Vann said the issue also needs to be explored more because of not only increased flood danger if the dams are removed, but the loss of recreation. "If we take the hard-line approaches, rather than an overall focus, we're really doing ourselves a disservice," she said. (Excerpts) $10.3 Million W.Va Dam Rehabilitation Project Passes Halfway Mark By: Brenda Ruggiero - CEG Correspondent | Published On: 10/24/2012 A $10.3 million dam rehabilitation project in Grant County, W.Va., is well past the halfway point. The project involves New Creek Site 14. Notice to proceed was issued in January 2011, and the contract completion date is currently set for March 2013. The original contract amount was reportedly $9.6 million, but with contract modifications and variations in estimated quantities, the final contract amount is estimated to be approximately $10.3 million. The funding for the project is 65 percent federal and 35 percent local, with local sponsors being Potomac Valley Conservation District; the city of Keyser, W.Va.; and the West Virginia State Conservation Committee. The prime contractor is Heeter Construction Inc. of Spencer, W.Va., where Dave Heter serves as president. The most significant subcontractor is ASI Constructors Inc. from Pueblo West, Colo., the company responsible for Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) and reinforced concrete placement. “The rehabilitation project includes many of the elements involved in the rehabilitation of an existing embankment structure,” said Carol Lagodich, public affairs specialist of the West Virginia State Office of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). “USDA-NRCS has assisted with the design and construction of 170 dams in W.Va. However, this project is the first rehabilitation of a dam by NRCS in West Virginia.” The contract calls for the rehabilitation of the flood control and water supply dam, which includes flattening both the upstream and downstream slopes to improve stability of the embankment, installation of an internal filter and drainage system in the downstream slope of the embankment, replacement of the upstream riser intake structure, and construction of an (RCC) stepped-chute auxiliary spillway. “The construction challenges included working upstream of a flood control dam and construction of the RCC auxiliary spillway with limited construction area and access,” ------------. Hydro: (More hydro is always better!) 2 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu NPPD to fund water study By Tyler Ellyson , columbustelegram.com Columbus, Nebr.— Nebraska Public Power District will fund a study to determine whether it can affordably generate more hydroelectricity. The utility is paying Colorado-based Applegate Group $150,274 to evaluate the potential for more hydropower in Nebraska, both in existing plants and at new sites. McMillen Engineering and Telluride Energy also are assisting on the study, which is expected to be finalized by April 2013. Brian Barels, NPPD’s water resources manager, said it’s the right time for a feasibility study on hydroelectricity because federal licensing requirements on the renewable energy are being eased and recent research has focused on new ways to generate power using water sources. “There’s a number of existing facilities around the state that might have potential with these new technologies,” Barels said. Currently, NPPD owns hydropower plants near Spencer, North Platte and Kearney and purchases electricity generated by two plants on the Loup Public Power District canal and from Kingsley Hydro on Lake McConaughy and two plants owned by Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District positioned on canals downstream from Johnson Lake. Those plants will be evaluated to determine whether upgrades can be made to improve efficiency or increase production. Other existing infrastructure, such as the Sutherland Reservoir near Gerald Gentleman Station and Loup’s power canal, will be looked at as potential sites for new projects. Barels said advanced equipment that doesn’t require a large reservoir of water opens the door for more hydroelectric opportunities. For instance, Barels pointed to a new wastewater treatment plant planned in South Sioux City as a site where hydrokinetic technology could be used to generate electricity using water from the discharge pipe. “There’s different ways that you can use hydro now,” he said. According to Barels, Nebraska’s newest hydroelectric plant was added to the Kingsley Dam in the mid-1980s. But the resource hasn’t been forgotten. Applegate Group will call on previous state and private studies to identify locations suitable for hydroelectricity. Barels said there are sites where people would like a reservoir for recreation or flood control that could also produce power and several existing dams, particularly on the Republican River, can be retrofitted to do so. “There’s a lot of information out there that we can take and apply,” he said. Hydroelectricity presently comprises about 8.6 percent of the total electricity generated and purchased by NPPD. Wind, by comparison, makes up slightly less than 4 percent, but is expected to reach 5.2 percent by year’s end after wind farms near Broken Bow and Crofton go online. NPPD has a goal of receiving 10 percent of its power from renewable sources by 2020. Barels, who called the cost of hydropower “very competitive” with other sources, said adding more water- generated electricity makes sense as the district moves to strengthen its renewable portfolio. And unlike wind, water can be stored for use during high-demand times. Hydroelectricity, Barels said, is also more flexible than coal-fired plants, which are slow to increase output when extra power is needed. “It offers some of those capabilities in our energy mix that aren’t necessarily there,” Barels said of hydroelectricity. However, there are downsides such as the current drought that has limited water supplies across the state and 2011 flooding that had many hydro plants producing at full-tilt for an extended period. “There’s positives and negatives to all the different energy resources,” Barels said. “We try to find that mix that works best to have what we need when we need it for our customers.” (Hydro history and a sad ending!) Coon Rapids Hydroelectric Dam Creator: Philip Cooper, October 18, 2012, mnopedia.org By the early 20th century, the goals for the Mississippi Headwaters dam building had expanded beyond flood prevention and navigation. Electric power production was central to the new goals. This led to the construction of several hydroelectric dams throughout Minnesota. These dams were intended to encourage 3 Coon Rapids Dam in 1920 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu population growth and industry.
Recommended publications
  • Changing Times — the Challenges and Risks of Managing Aging Infrastructure Under a New Financial Reality
    United States Society on Dams Changing Times — The Challenges and Risks of Managing Aging Infrastructure Under a New Financial Reality 33rd Annual USSD Conference Phoenix, Arizona, February 11-15, 2013 CONTENTS Plenary Session USACE Experience in Performing Constructability Reviews ...............1 David Paul, Mike Zoccola and Vanessa Bateman, Corps of Engineers; and Dan Hertel, Engineering Solutions, LLC Levees Levee Evaluation with Ground-Penetrating Radar ....................3 Hussein Khalefa Chlaib, Haydar Al-Shukri, Hanan Mahdi, M. Mert Su, Aycan Catakli and Najah Abd, University of Arkansas at Little Rock How Enhanced and Economically Viable Engineering Analysis Can Help Levee Owners Evaluate Their Inventory in Response to FEMA’s Proposed Approach for Non-Accredited Levees ..................................5 Todd Mitchell, Paul Grosskruger and Cornelia Dean, Fugro Constultants, Inc.; and Bob Woldringh, Furgro Engineers, BV Use of Fragility Curves in Assigning Levee Remediation Priorities ...........7 Rich Millet, Sujan Punyamurthula, Derek Morley and Loren Murray, URS Corporation Probabilistic Evaluation of Levee Distress for the Sacramento River Bank Protection Project .....................................9 Khaled Chowdhury, URS Corporation; Derek Morley and Mary Perlea, Corps of Engineers; Wilbur Huang, California Department of Water Resources; and Matthew Weil and Saritha Aella, URS Corporation Integrating Levee Performance Assessments into Complex Flood Protection Systems ..........................................11 T. Mitchell,
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California
    Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-C Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California By WILLARD W. DEAN fPith a section on GEOMORPHIC EFFECTS IN THE KERN RIVER BASIN By KEVIN M. SCOTT FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-C UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-610922 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 45 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract_____________________________________________________ Cl Introduction.____________ _ ________________________________________ 1 Acknowledgments. ________________________________________________ 3 Precipitation__ ____________________________________________________ 5 General description of the floods___________________________________ 9 Kern River basin______________________________________________ 12 Tule River basin______________________________________________ 16 Kaweah River basin____________________________--_-____-_---_- 18 Miscellaneous basins___________________________________________ 22 Storage regulation _________________________________________________ 22 Flood damage.__________________________________________________ 23 Comparison to previous floods___________-_____________--___------_
    [Show full text]
  • Isabella Dam Failure Plan
    LAKE ISABELLA DAM FAILURE EVACUATION PLAN Prepared by Robert Olson Associates December 2009 LAKE ISABELLA DAM FAILURE EVACUATION PLAN RECORD OF CHANGES Change Date of Section Number, Header, Page Initiated by Number Change Number (Department/Agency) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 RECORD OF CHANGES - i - December 2009 LAKE ISABELLA DAM FAILURE EVACUATION PLAN FOREWORD This plan was developed and is maintained by the Kern County/Operational Area (OA) Office of Emergency Services. It provides the basic framework for response to an actual or potential failure of the Lake Isabella Dam, in accordance with the requirements of the Dam Safety Act (GC § 8589.5). This plan supplements the Kern County/OA and City of Bakersfield Emergency Operations Plans (EOPs) and will be implemented in conjunction with those EOPs. Extensive research concerning hurricane-related evacuations by Baker1 and others indicates that for the evacuation of communities to be effective, residents must know which areas are at risk and must be persuaded to leave; the evacuation must commence prior to arrival of the threat; and transportation resources must be sufficient to move evacuees to safe areas. When determining if people will evacuate, three factors are key: 1) actual and perceived vulnerability of their location, 2) whether or not they believe they have been told to evacuate by local officials, and 3) the severity of the threat. Aggressively communicating the evacuation recommendation tends to produce the desired action, although dissemination of the warning via the media is not usually sufficient. The best way to alert the public is for officials to go door-to-door.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains OHV Restoration ______
    United States Department of Final Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service August 2013 Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Restoration Project Kern River Ranger District, Sequoia National Forest Kern County, California For Information Contact: Penelope Shibley P.O. Box 9, Kernville, CA 93238 760-376-3781 [email protected] Cover photo: Easily accessed and popular recreation site located along the lower Kern River The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795- 3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Final Environmental Assessment Lower Kern Canyon and Greenhorn Mountains OHV Restoration ______________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Report Card Report Card for Kern County’S Infrastructure
    2009 2009 Report Card Report Card for Kern County’s Infrastructure Atmospheric Quality D Energy B Solid Waste A Waste Water B- Domestic Water B- Northern Calif. Delta D Schools B- Parks C- Kern County’s Infrastructure Transportation D+ A County at the Crossroads Airports B Roads D Highways D Transit C- Bridges C+ Rail C+ Flood Control D+ Kern County’s Infrastructure C- A Citizen’s Guide Leadership Messages on Restoring America’s Infrastructure: “We will rebuild and retrofit America to meet the demands of the Twenty-First Century. That means repairing and modernizing thousands of miles of America’s roadways and providing new mass transit options for millions of Americans. If we act boldly, A Few Words of Special Appreciation: we will emerge stronger and more prosperous than we were before.” The IRCC members are, of course, deeply indebted to the members of the local ASCE, ACEC and APWA organizations for Barack H. Obama their support of this Report Card project. Even though those organizations were the originators of the project, the continuing 44th President of the United States commitment of their memberships to it is still deserving of recognition as an important public service. Much volunteer time (Excerpted from ASCE's video, “2009 Report Card for America's Infrastructure”) has been spent, as well as considerable funding from lean organizational budgets. It is to be hoped that those citizens of Kern County who review this document will understand and appreciate such commitment, as well as the sense of genuine concern “Crumbling infrastructure has a direct impact on our personal and economic health, and the nation’s infrastructure crisis is underlying the efforts reported in these pages.
    [Show full text]
  • BAKERSFIELD.COM Trump Visits Bakersfi Eld
    THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2020 • BAKERSFIELD.COM Trump visits Bakersfi eld ALEX HORVATH / THE CALIFORNIAN House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy and President Donald Trump react to farmer Larry Starrh’s praise of the president’s efforts on behalf of farmers. The president visited Bakersfield to sign his administration’s reworking of environmental regulations that will direct more of the state’s water to farmers and other agriculture interests in the Central Valley. See more photos from the event at Bakersfield.com. President signs declaration for delivering more Northern Calif. water to Central Valley farmers BY JOHN COX [email protected] ON BAKERSFIELD.COM President Donald Trump, • More photos of Trump’s speaking to a cheering crowd appearance in Bakersfield next to Meadows Field Airport, moved forward Wednesday with • Video of Air Force One touch- a controversial plan intended to ing down give Central Valley farmers more • Vote in a poll on what you’d water from the environmentally like to talk about with Presi- sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin dent Trump River Delta east of San Francisco. Trump signed a presidential memorandum that, along with fi- the action, adding that “California nalization Wednesday of a federal won’t allow the Trump Adminis- “record of decision,” is intended to tration to destroy and deplete our bring new flexibility to the opera- natural resources.” tion of two main conduits bring- Farming groups and Central ing water south from Northern Valley politicians have hailed the California, the Central Valley Proj- Trump administration’s proposal ect and the State Water Project. as a breakthrough that would California Attorney General provide water badly needed by Xavier Becerra immediately re- California’s agricultural industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Safety Analyses for Isabella Dam
    November 13, 2007 Dam Safety Analyses for Isabella Dam by Ronn S. Rose, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers ABSTRACT Three deficiencies exist at Isabella Dam: a deficiency for the “Probable Maximum Flood” (PMF); a seismic deficiency; and a potentially serious seepage issue. Specific to seismic performance, Corps of Engineers criteria state that dams must be able to safely retain the reservoir under the Maximum Credible Earthquake (although damage under the MCE loading is acceptable), and suffer little to no damage under the Operating Basis Earthquake, generally defined as the maximum groundmotions expected at the dam site with a return period of 144 years (50% probability of occurrence in 100 years). Recently, the Corps has moved towards a risk-based approach to Dam Safety decision making. Initial screening level risk assessment has indicated that the Corps’ Sacramento District operates several dams that have high risk features, with seismic risk prominent at Isabella Dam. In terms of risk to downstream residents, Isabella dam ranks at the top among all 600 (+) dams in the Corps’ inventory. Isabella Dam is located approximately 34 miles northeast of the City of Bakersfield on the Kern River in Kern County, California. The current study was initiated in 2003, and has been accelerated with the finding that the previously believed inactive Kern Canyon Fault, which passes under the right abutment of the Auxiliary dam, is likely a “capable” fault. The presence of loose alluvial soils has been confirmed under the Auxiliary dam, which leads to an extremely high risk to the downstream population. BIOGRAPHY Registered Geologist B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Kern River Whitewater Run Sequoia National Forest Kern River Ranger District
    USDA ~ United States Department of Agriculture Lower Kern River Whitewater Run Sequoia National Forest Kern River Ranger District Welcome to the Kern River! With a gradient of 30 feet per mile, the Kern is one of the steepest and wildest whitewater rides in North America. The Lower Kern runs 32 miles from Isabella Dam to the canyon mouth above Bakersfield. The first 19 miles of the Lower Kern provide thrilling rapids River Use Manifest: Each day, a completed manifest for river runners each summer. At normal flows, BLM must be left at the launch site for the specific river run launch sites to Sandy Flat is mostly class II water, with a few prior to your trip. Manifests are available at each Forest short class III rapids. Sandy Flat to Democrat Beach is class Service office and at the launch sites. The maximum party III and IV rapids with class II sections interspersed. One class size for the Lower Kern is 15 people. More than one V+ rapid, Royal Flush, is found in this section where permit number may appear on a manifest as long as the boaters must portage using the developed trail on the right number of passengers does not exceed the 15 person limit. bank. Below Democrat you’ll find numerous class V+ rapids, with a short area of class II and III near Richbar. Recommended Safety Equipment: A Coast Guard approved personal flotation device must be readily Launch Sites: The Lower Kern has four designated launch accessible, properly fit, and in good condition, for each sites: BLM South near Lake Isabella Main Dam, BLM North member of the party.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide Geology and Mining History of the Kern
    FIELD GUIDE GEOLOGY AND MINING HISTORY OF THE KERN CANYON, LAKE ISABELLA AND WALKER BASIN, KERN COUNTY CALIFORNIA Gregg Wilkerson 2017 1 Acknowledgements This field guide is adapted from field guides produced by the Buena Vista Museum of Natural History and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management from 1993 through 2003. Almost all of the mine descriptions in this field guide are adapted from those found in the Troxell and Morton (1968) report on the “Mines and Mineral Resources of Kern County.” Field Trip Overview This field trip leaves the Coseree's Deli parking lot at 8:15 a.m. We then take High- way 178 up through the Kern Canyon to Lake Isabella. After visiting sites around the lake we take the Havilah-Bodfish road south toward Walker Basin. We visit the museum in Havilah and return to Bakersfield through Twin Oaks on Caliente Creek. Participants should all bring water and a sack lunch. Contents ROAD LOGS.......................................................5 PART 1: BAKERSFIELD TO LAKE ISABELLA............................5 AREA MAP 01................................................5 AREA MAP 02...............................................11 AREA MAP 03...............................................15 WATER DISTRIBUTION OF KERN RIVER.....................15 STOP NO. 1. MOUTH OF KERN CANYON: PG&E POWER HOUSE...........................................17 GOLD IN KERN COUNTY..................................22 AREA MAP 04...............................................28 STOP NO. 2: RICHBAR HYDRAULIC MINING.................31 AREA MAP 05...............................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Kings River Handbook 2009
    TThehe KKingsings RRiveriver HHandbookandbook Prepared by the Public Information Staff of KRCD and KRWA JJ. Randall McFarland, KRCD and KRWA Public Relations Consultant CCristelr L. Tufenkjian, KRCD Manager of Community & Public Relations Special material provided by James Provost The Kings River Handbook 4886 E. Jensen Avenue 4888 E. Jensen Avenue Fresno, CA 93725 Fresno, CA 93725 559.237.5567 559.266.0767 www.krcd.org www.kingsriverwater.org September 2009 Fifth Printing Permission to reprint is granted with credit to the Kings River Conservation District and Kings River Water Association Contents INTRODUCTION . .Page 3 A SYNOPSIS OF KINGS RIVER HISTORY . .Page 4 Beginnings Initial Development, Disputes, Solutions The Modern Era ALONG THE KINGS RIVER. .Page 15 The High Sierra Pine Flat Dam and Reservoir The River: Pine Flat to State Route 99 State Route 99 to Army and Island Weirs Clark's Fork, South Fork and Tulare Lake North Fork and James Bypass KINGS RIVER WATER USERS . .Page 29 Agricultural Water Users Urban Water Agencies Water for the Fishery Groundwater Kings River Support Agencies KRWA MEMBER UNITS . .Page 37 Upper River Agencies Lower River Agencies: State Route 99 to Army and Island Weirs South Fork Agencies: Army Weir to Empire Weir No. 2 Lower River Agencies: Empire Weir No. 2 and Tulare Lake Bed Lower River Agencies: Island Weir to Mendota Pool THE KINGS RIVER THROUGH HISTORY (TIME LINE). .Page 42 QUICK FACTS ABOUT THE KINGS RIVER . .Page 45 THE KINGS RIVER'S PROFILE . .Page 46 FEATURES ALONG THE RIVER . .Page 47 2 Introduction There is nothing in the world quite like the Kings River.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Surface Water Hydrology
    APPENDIX I SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY Andrew J. Draper October 15, 2000 INTRODUCTION CALVIN models California’s inter-connected water supply system. In Northern California, this consists of all inflows to the Central Valley originating from the Trinity-Cascade, Sierra Nevada and Coastal Mountain ranges. It also includes many small streams that result from direct runoff within the Valley floor. Much of Southern California is arid or semi-arid and is dependent on imports from the Central Valley, Owens Valley and the Colorado River for majority of its water supply. Local surface water supplies are available only in the South Coast Hydrologic Region, where coastal range streams represent approximately six percent of supply (DWR 1994, Vol. II, p103). CALVIN represents surface water supplies as a time series of monthly inflows. In HEC-PRM terminology, these inputs are referred to as “external flows”, and represent an inflow from the “super source” to a model node USACE (1999). The external flows can be divided into two categories: q Rim flows; and q Local water supplies. Rim flows represent streams that cross the boundary of the physical system being modeled. Typically they represent inflows to surface water reservoirs located in either the Sierra Nevada foothills or the Trinity/Cascade Mountain range. Local water supplies represent surface water that originates within the boundary of the region being modeled, either from direct runoff or through surface water-groundwater interaction. In some models, these local water supplies are called gains or accretions and depletions. The distinction between rim flows and local water supplies is made as two different sources of data have been used for estimating external flows in the Central Valley: one for rim flows, the other for local water supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • SFK and Others Submitted a Letter
    VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL September 5, 2018 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District Gregory Krzys, Biological Sciences Environmental Manager 1325 J Street, Room 1513 Sacramento, CA 95814 Email: [email protected] RE: USACE Isabella Dam Modification Project Public Safety Concerns, Significant New Information, and Changes in Conditions Dear Mr. Krzys: The Kern‐Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club, Sequoia ForestKeeper®, the Center for Biological Diversity, and Western Watersheds Project (collectively “conservation groups”) submit this letter regarding public safety hazards associated with the Isabella Lake Dam Safety Modification Project that have not been fully addressed in the piecemeal environmental review and project approval process. Because there is significant new information and changed circumstances that must be addressed regarding rainfall patterns affecting the frequency of potential flood events and the risks of dam overtopping and flooding,123 we urge the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to prepare a supplemental environmental review for this project. The conservation groups have participated in the public review process and attended meetings 1 See, e.g., NOAA Research News, When noise becomes signal: Unusual California precipitation over last two winters could have been predicted , Friday, July 27, 2018, discussing Wang et al. (2017). Seasonal noise versus subseasonal signal: Forecasts of California precipitation during the unusual winters of 2015–2016 and 2016–2017. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 9513–9520. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/2017GL075052 2 See Institute for Basic Science, Science Daily, The blueprint for El Nino diversity discussing Timmermann et al. (2018) El Niño–Southern Oscillation complexity. Nature. volume 559, pages 535–545 3 See Stanford News.
    [Show full text]