Model Diversity in Fashion Advertising: the Influence of Self-Model Congruity on Body Appreciation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Model Diversity in Fashion Advertising: The Influence of Self-Model Congruity on Body Appreciation A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY BREANA JONES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Dr. Elizabeth Bye, Adviser May 2017 © Breana Jones 2017 Acknowledgements Special thanks to my adviser, Dr. Elizabeth Bye, for all of your help and guidance. Thanks to Dr. Kim Johnson, for believing in me and for encouraging me to pursue this topic. Thanks to each of my committee members for your insightful feedback. Thanks so much to Goldstein Museum of Design for funding my research trip to San Antonio, TX. Thanks to Mimi Quintinilla for your assistance in finding participants in San Antonio, TX. A heartwarming thanks to my loving fiancé, Mr. Jelks, for your many encouraging words and your comforting prayers during this journey. Last but not certainly not least, a very big thank you to my amazing parents, Dr. and Mrs. Jones, for believing in me when I was admitted into college at age 14 and for funding my entire A.S. Degree because I was too young to qualify for scholarships. Thanks for always being by my side and for continuously lifting me up in prayer. Because of your love and unwavering support, I will have my M.S. Degree at age 21. I couldn’t have done this without each of you! i Dedication To every woman who just wants to feel beautiful, Always remember that you don’t need society’s validation to be fabulous! Be FIERCE, Be FUN, & Be YOU! Demand to be treated like the Queen you are, & Never, ever let your crown fall! Cheers to redefining beautiful! ii Abstract A majority of the women in the U.S. do not match the conventional standard of beauty. Consequently, they feel underrepresented in fashion advertisements and mass media imagery (“#Plus is Equal”, 2015). Using an advocacy/transformative philosophical assumption, the purpose of this exploratory qualitative study is to understand the impact of the lack of model diversity in fashion advertisements and media images on viewers’ self-perceptions. Ultimately, this study should aid in the process of revolutionizing society’s current definition of beauty by highlighting the importance and positive outcomes of featuring diverse models in advertisements and mass media imagery. This research introduces a new approach by examining the applicability of minority stress theory (Meyer, 2003) to understand the influence of media images on female consumers. The snowball, convenience sample included fifteen women from Chicago, IL, San Antonio, TX, and Minneapolis - Saint Paul, MN; with five women from each geographical location. This sample of Black, Latina, and White women represent ages from 18 - 71. This study was designed using the stimulus-organism-response framework (Mehrabian and Russell, 1974) and supported by self-congruity theory (Sirgy, 1985) and minority stress theory (Meyer, 2003). The negative effects of the lack of model diversity and the areas in which the interviewees would like to see increased diversity emerged during data analysis. iii Table of Contents List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1 - Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 Significance of Proposed Research ................................................................................. 5 Role of the Researcher .................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 - Review of Related Literature ........................................................................... 8 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................................... 8 2.1 The Positive Influence of Self-Model Body Congruity on Body Appreciation ..... 10 2.2 Media’s Negative Effects on Self-Perceptions ....................................................... 15 Research Question ........................................................................................................ 21 Conceptual Model ......................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 3 - Method ........................................................................................................... 22 Pilot Study ..................................................................................................................... 22 Sample Selection ........................................................................................................... 24 Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 25 Procedure ...................................................................................................................... 28 Interview Questions ...................................................................................................... 29 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................ 30 The Data Analysis Process............................................................................................ 31 Chapter 4 - Findings & Interpretation ............................................................................... 32 4.1 Stimuli Reactions .................................................................................................... 35 Figure 8: ........................................................................................................................ 35 Figure 9: ........................................................................................................................ 36 Figure 10: ...................................................................................................................... 37 Figure 11: ...................................................................................................................... 39 Figure 12: ...................................................................................................................... 40 Figure 13: ...................................................................................................................... 42 Figure 14: ...................................................................................................................... 44 Figure 15: ...................................................................................................................... 46 4.2 The Influence of Current Model Representation on Viewers’ Self-Perceptions .... 49 4.3 Desired Diversity and its Influence on Viewers’ Self-Perceptions ........................ 59 Chapter 5 – Discussion & Conclusion .............................................................................. 72 Managerial Implications ............................................................................................... 75 Limitations .................................................................................................................... 77 Further Research Recommendations ............................................................................ 77 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 80 Appendix ........................................................................................................................... 87 Interview Questions without stimuli– Part 2 of the Interview ...................................... 87 iv List of Tables Table 1. Definition of Key Constructs ................................................................................ 6 Table 2. Stimuli Criterion ................................................................................................. 26 Table 3. Participant Profiles .............................................................................................. 33 Table 4. Desired Diversity ................................................................................................ 66 Table 5. Findings .............................................................................................................. 69 v List of Figures Figure 1. The Derivative of Body Congruity & its Relationship with Body Appreciation ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 2. Dove's Real Beauty Campaign .......................................................................... 11 Figure 3. Lane Bryant’s #I’m No Angel ........................................................................... 13 Figure 4. One of Many Plus is Equal Ads ........................................................................ 14 Figure 5. Lane Bryant's Plus is Equal Logo ...................................................................... 15 Figure 6. Conceptual Model ............................................................................................. 21 Figure 7. Data Analysis Illustration .................................................................................. 31 Figure 8. Ideal – White & Thin Photo: Sunglass Hut ................................................. 35 Figure 9. Racial Diversity - within one image