DOCSLIB.ORG

Employer Payroll Employer Contact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Employer Payroll Employer Contact Employer Payroll Employer Contact Advisory, Conciliation, and Arbitration Services Northgate [email protected] Architecture and Design Scotland MOJ [email protected] Association of Chief Police Officers CGI [email protected] Audit Scotland In house - manual interface [email protected] Big Lottery CGI [email protected] BIS UKSBS [email protected] British business bank (formerly capital for SAGE [email protected] enterprise) British Museum Northgate [email protected] Cabinet Office SSCL [email protected] Cairngorms National Park Authority In-house [email protected] CAFCASS In-house [email protected] CEFAS CGI [email protected] Charity Commission CGI [email protected] Children's Commission for Wales CET Payroll Services [email protected] Children’s Commissioner In-house [email protected] China Britain Business In-house [email protected] Churches Conservation Trust Sage [email protected] Coal Authority CGI [email protected] [email protected] / College of Policing Capita [email protected] Commonwealth Parliamentary House of Commons [email protected] Companies House Northgate [email protected] Competition Service Moorepay [email protected] Consumer Council for Water CGI [email protected] Criminal Cases Review Commission Capita [email protected] Crown Commercial Service (formerly CGI [email protected] government procurement service) Crown Office CGI [email protected] Crown Prosecution Service CGI [email protected] DCLG CGI [email protected] Debt Management Office CGI [email protected] DECC CGI [email protected] DEFRA CGI [email protected] Department for Education SSCL [email protected] Department of Health CGI [email protected] / [email protected] DFID In-house [email protected] [email protected] / DFT Arvato [email protected] [email protected] / Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency Arvato [email protected] DSTL Equiniti- ICS [email protected] DVLA Arvato [email protected] DVSA (EX VOSA) Arvato [email protected] [email protected] / DWP SSCL [email protected] Electoral Commission Northgate [email protected] English Heritage Midland HR [email protected] Equality Human Rights Ceridan [email protected] ESTYN CGI [email protected] In-house (Computer Bureau Fife Ethical Standards in Public Life Scotland [email protected] Ltd) FCO In-house – (Oracle) [email protected] Food Environment Research Agency Northgate [email protected] Food Standards Agency Midland HR [email protected] Forestry Commission In-house [email protected] GAD In-house [email protected] [email protected] / Gambling Commission CGI [email protected] Gangmasters Licensing Authority In-house [email protected] GCHQ CGI [email protected] Greater Teaching Council for Wales In-house [email protected] HEFCE In house (Frontier) [email protected] Heritage Lottery Fund CGI [email protected] [email protected] / Highways Agency Arvato [email protected] Historic Scotland Northgate [email protected] HM Land Registry CGI [email protected] [email protected] / HM Treasury CGI [email protected] HMRC HMRC SS [email protected] House of Commons In-house [email protected] HSE SSCL [email protected] Imperial War Museum Northgate [email protected] Independent Living Fund In-house [email protected] Intellectual Property Office UKSBS [email protected] JNCC CGI [email protected] Maritime and Coastguard Agency CGI [email protected] Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime CGI [email protected] Met Office Equiniti-ICS [email protected] MHRA Dept. of Health - CGI [email protected] Ministry of Justice Liberata [email protected] MOD In house [email protected] Monitor Dept. of Health - CGI [email protected] Museums of Liverpool In-house (Cascade) [email protected] National Archives CGI [email protected] National Assembly for Wales Northgate [email protected] / [email protected] National Crime Agency Northgate [email protected] National Galleries of Scotland Cintra [email protected] National Media Museum ATOS [email protected] National Museums of Scotland Equiniti-ICS [email protected] / [email protected] National Portrait Gallery In-house (Carvel) [email protected] National Savings and Investment CGI [email protected] Natural History Museum Northgate [email protected] / [email protected] Natural Resources Wales Northgate [email protected] NHS Confederation ADP [email protected] NIO Liberata [email protected] NOMS MOJ [email protected] Northern Lighthouse Board In-house [email protected] Nuclear Decommissioning Authority CGI [email protected] / [email protected] Office For Nuclear Regulation SSCL [email protected] / [email protected] Office of Fair Trading (Competition and Markets SSCL [email protected] Authority) Office of Immigration Services Commissioner Moorepay [email protected] Office of Rail Regulation Liberata [email protected] OFGEM Midland HR [email protected] OFSTED SSCL [email protected] [email protected] / Older People Wales In-house [email protected] ONS CGI [email protected] [email protected] / Ordnance Survey CGI [email protected] Pension Ombudsman Macintyre Hudson [email protected] Pension Protection Fund Bond [email protected] Pension Service Ombudsman for Wales In-house (Sage 50 Payroll) [email protected] Planning Inspectorate CGI [email protected] Police Investigations & Review Commissioner Scottish Government [email protected] Public Health England CGI [email protected] / [email protected] QEII Conference Centre Moorepay [email protected] RCAHMS CGI [email protected] Registers of Scotland Northgate [email protected] Royal Armouries Northgate [email protected] Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh Cintra HR [email protected] Royal Parks CGI [email protected] Rural Payment Agency CGI [email protected] SCCYP MOJ [email protected] Scottish Court Service Northgate [email protected] Scottish Funding Council In-house [email protected] Scottish Government In house [email protected] Scottish Human Rights Moorepay [email protected] Scottish Information Commissioner MOJ [email protected] Scottish Natural Heritage In house [email protected] Scottish Parliament Corporate Body Equiniti-ICS [email protected] Scottish Road Works Commissioner Scottish Government [email protected] Security Industry Authority Baker Tilly [email protected] Sir John Soane’s Museum Northgate [email protected] Skills Funding Agency In house [email protected] Sports Ground Safety Authority CGI [email protected] Supreme Court Liberata [email protected] Tate Gallery Northgate [email protected] / [email protected] [email protected] / The Crown Estate CGI [email protected] TPAS In house [email protected] TPR In house [email protected] Transport for London In house [email protected] Trinity House In house [email protected] TSOL In-house [email protected] UK Commission for Employment and Skills In house [email protected] UK Hydrographic Office In house [email protected] UKEF CGI [email protected] University College London In house [email protected] Valuation Office HMRC [email protected] / [email protected] Vehicle Certification Agency Arvato [email protected] Victoria & Albert Museum CGI [email protected] Wales Audit Office In-house [email protected] Wallace Collection Equiniti-ICS [email protected] Welsh Government CGI [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE GREEN BOOK Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government
    THE GREEN BOOK Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government Treasury Guidance LONDON:TSO CONTENTS Page Page Contents iv Annex 1 Government intervention 51 Introduction 51 Preface v Economic efficiency 51 Chapter 1 Introduction and background 1 Equity 52 Introduction 1 Additionality 52 When to use the Green Book 2 Regeneration 54 Chapter 2 Overview of appraisal and Annex 2 Valuing non-market impacts 57 evaluation 3 Introduction 57 Introduction 3 Valuing non-market impacts 57 The appraisal and evaluation cycle 3 Current research/plausible estimates 59 The role of appraisal 3 Valuing environmental impacts 63 Process for appraisal and evaluation 4 Annex 3 Land and buildings 69 Presenting the results 6 Introduction 69 Managing appraisals and evaluations 7 Acquisition and use of property 69 Frameworks 8 Leases and rents 71 Issues relevant to appraisal and evaluation 9 Disposal of property 72 Chapter 3 Justifying action 11 Cost effective land use 72 Introduction 11 Annex 4 Risk and uncertainty 79 Reasons for government intervention 11 Introduction 79 Carrying out research 11 Risk management 79 Chapter 4 Setting objectives 13 Transferring risk 82 Introduction 13 Optimism bias 85 Objectives, outcomes, outputs and targets 13 Monte Carlo analysis 87 Irreversible risk 88 Chapter 5 Appraising the options 17 The cost of variability in outcomes 88 Introduction 17 Creating options 17 Annex 5 Distributional impacts 91 Valuing the costs and benefits of options 19 Introduction 91 Adjustments to values of costs and benefits 24 Distributional analysis 91
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Collaborations (2014-2019)
    Scientific Collaborations (2014-2019) NOAA ● National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service ○ Center for Satellite Applications and Research ○ CoastWatch ○ National Centers for Environmental Information ○ OceanWatch ● National Marine Fisheries Service ○ Alaska Fisheries Science Center ○ Northeast Fisheries Science Center ○ Northwest Fisheries Science Center ○ Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center ○ Office of Science and Technology ○ Southeast Fisheries Science Center ○ Southeast Regional Office ○ Southwest Fisheries Science Center ● National Ocean Service ○ U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System ■ Caribbean Regional Association for Coastal Ocean Observing (CARICOOS) ■ Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System (GCOOS) ● Gulf of Mexico Coastal Acidification Network (GCAN) ■ Mid-Atlantic Coastal Ocean Observing System (MARACOOS) ■ Pacific Islands Ocean Observing System (PacIOOS) ■ Southeast Coastal Ocean Observing Regional Association (SECOORA) ● Southeast Ocean and Coastal Acidification Network (SOCAN) ○ National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science ○ National Geodetic Survey ○ Office of National Marine Sanctuaries ■ Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary ■ Flower Gardens Bank National Marine Sanctuary ■ National Marine Sanctuary of American Samoa ■ Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary ○ Office of Response and Restoration ● National Weather Service ○ Climate Prediction Center ○ Environmental Modeling Center ○ National Centers for Environmental Prediction ○ National Data Buoy Center ○ National Hurricane Center 1 ○ Office
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants
    WMO Sypmposium on Impact Based Forecasting and Warning Services Met Office, United Kingdom 2-4 December 2019 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Name Organisation 1 Abdoulaye Diakhete National Agency of Civil Aviation and Meteorology 2 Angelia Guy National Meteorological Service of Belize 3 Brian Golding Met Office Science Fellow - WMO HIWeather WCRP Impact based Forecast Team, Korea Meteorological 4 Byungwoo Jung Administration 5 Carolina Gisele Cerrudo National Meteorological Service Argentina 6 Caroline Zastiral British Red Cross 7 Catalina Jaime Red Cross Climate Centre Directorate for Space, Security and Migration Chiara Proietti 8 Disaster Risk Management Unit 9 Chris Tubbs Met Office, UK 10 Christophe Isson Météo France 11 Christopher John Noble Met Service, New Zealand 12 Dan Beardsley National Weather Service NOAA/National Weather Service, International Affairs Office 13 Daniel Muller 14 David Rogers World Bank GFDRR 15 Dr. Frederiek Sperna Weiland Deltares 16 Dr. Xu Tang Weather & Disaster Risk Reduction Service, WMO National center for hydro-meteorological forecasting, Viet Nam 17 Du Duc Tien 18 Elizabeth May Webster South African Weather Service 19 Elizabeth Page UCAR/COMET 20 Elliot Jacks NOAA 21 Gerald Fleming Public Weather Service Delivery for WMO 22 Germund Haugen Met No 23 Haleh Kootval World Bank Group 24 Helen Bye Met Office, UK 25 Helene Correa Météo-France Impact based Forecast Team, Korea Meteorological 26 Hyo Jin Han Administration Impact based Forecast Team, Korea Meteorological 27 Inhwa Ham Administration Meteorological Service
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Forestry Commission
    South Carolina Forestry Commission Annual Report 2000-2001 The South Carolina Forestry Commission prohibits discrimination in all programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. The Forestry Commission is an equal opportunity provider and employer. To file a complaint of discrimination, contact the Human Resources Director, SC Forestry Commission, P.O. Box 21707, Columbia, SC 29221, or call (803)896-8879. TABLE OF CONTENTS FORESTRY COMMISSIONERS AND ADMINISTRATION................................................. 3 MISSION ....................................................................................................................................... 4 FIELD OPERATIONS SUPPORT.............................................................................................. 5 FOREST MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 8 URBAN FORESTRY ............................................................................................................................... 9 FOREST STEWARDSHIP ....................................................................................................................12 FOREST INVENTORY AND MONITORING .....................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Regional Water Resource Solutions: Guidance for 2021 Strategic Regional Water Resource Solutions: Guidance for 2021
    Regulators’ Alliance for Progressing Infrastructure Development February 2021 Strategic regional water resource solutions: guidance for 2021 Strategic regional water resource solutions: guidance for 2021 About this document This document relates to the gated process for strategic regional water resource solutions. It provides guidance for submissions received in 2021 and their assessment – that is, for the standard gate one (July 2021) and the accelerated gate two (September 2021). ‘PR19 final determinations: Strategic regional water resource solutions’1 presents the details of gate allowances, activities at each gate and delivery incentives. The activities that should be completed prior to each gate are further detailed in a submission template for each gate. Solution owners should use these templates to present the progress made by each gate and the evidence to support it, and should use this document as guidance to the overall process for gates taking place in 2021. 1 https://www.ofwat.gov.uk/publication/pr19-final-determinations-strategic-regional-water- resource-solutions-appendix 1 Strategic regional water resource solutions: guidance for 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Gated process for solutions funded in PR19 5 3. Timetable 7 4. Assessment 8 5. Queries process 14 6. New solutions 15 7. Flexibility 18 2 Strategic regional water resource solutions: guidance for 2021 1. Introduction 1.1 Background At PR19 Ofwat announced a £469 million ring-fenced development fund for companies to investigate and develop strategic water resource solutions that benefit customers, protect and enhance the environment and benefit wider society. This funding provides companies with the ability and certainty to accelerate the development of solutions to be ‘construction ready’ for the 2025-2030 period; it encourages joint working, enables additional analysis where required and provides outputs with greater certainty than would be available without it.
    [Show full text]
  • EFFICIENCY by DESIGN STORIES of BEST PRACTICE in PUBLIC BODIES Efficiency by Design: Stories of Best Practice in Public Bodies
    EFFICIENCY BY DESIGN STORIES OF BEST PRACTICE IN PUBLIC BODIES Efficiency by design: stories of best practice in public bodies Acknowledgements We would like to extend a special thank you to members of the Public Chairs’ Forum (PCF) and the Association of Chief Executives (ACE), who have contributed the case studies for this report and our website (a full list of which can be found at the end of this report); and to the Institute for Government, who have provided invaluable oversight and scrutiny over the course of this work. A special thanks is also extended to Amy Noonan and Lorna Sutton from the Public Chairs’ Forum and the Cabinet Office Public Public Bodies Reform team who have helped to put this report together. Foreword Chris Banks CBE, Chair of the Public Chairs’ Forum The Public Chairs’ Forum (PCF) is delighted to be working with Cabinet Office on this report designed to showcase examples of best practice efficiency in public bodies. Since the reform of public bodies was announced by the Coalition Government in October 2010, leaders of public bodies have been determined to respond positively to the Government’s challenge to deliver better public services at lower cost. Whilst there has been much visibility surrounding the savings made as a result of the reforms, less focus has been given to how these savings have been achieved while keeping to a minimum any negative impact on the delivery of public services and seeking to achieve improvements wherever possible. This publication seeks to shine light on the creative and imaginative measures that people working in public bodies have used to improve the efficiency of their organisations’ operations.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND REGISTRATION for the TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY a Conveyancing Revolution
    LAND REGISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY A Conveyancing Revolution LAND REGISTRATION BILL AND COMMENTARY Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 July 2001 LAW COMMISSION H M LAND REGISTRY LAW COM NO 271 LONDON: The Stationery Office HC 114 The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. THE COMMISSIONERS ARE: The Honourable Mr Justice Carnwath CVO, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale Mr Stuart Bridge· Professor Martin Partington Judge Alan Wilkie QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers Her Majesty’s Land Registry, a separate department of government and now an Executive Agency, maintains the land registers for England and Wales and is responsible for delivering all land registration services under the Land Registration Act 1925. The Chief Land Registrar and Chief Executive is Mr Peter Collis The Solicitor to H M Land Registry is Mr Christopher West The terms of this report were agreed on 31 May 2001. The text of this report is available on the Internet at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk · Mr Stuart Bridge was appointed Law Commissioner with effect from 2 July 2001. The terms of this report were agreed on 31 May 2001, while Mr Charles Harpum was a Law Commissioner. ii LAW COMMISSION HM LAND REGISTRY LAND REGISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY- FIRST CENTURY A Conveyancing Revolution CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART I: THE LAND REGISTRATION BILL AND
    [Show full text]
  • England Tree Strategy Erattum
    Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs England Tree Strategy Consultation - Technical Annex June 2020 Erattum 17th August 2020: The estimate of vacant land on page 11 has been updated to replace an error and explain the source of the estimate on page 12 of the consultation document. Contents Erattum ................................................................................................................................ 1 General background, ............................................................................................................ 1 Expanding and connecting our woods ................................................................................. 3 Ambition ........................................................................................................................... 4 Creating space for nature ................................................................................................. 5 Planting trees for water .................................................................................................... 6 Helping landowners create woodlands ............................................................................. 8 Working together to create landscape scale change ...................................................... 10 Restoring degraded land ................................................................................................ 11 Funding future woodland creation – markets for ecosystem services such as carbon ... 12 Supplying the trees we need to plant and
    [Show full text]
  • Land Registry Annual Report and Accounts 2005/6 Creating a Comprehensive Land Register Readers of This Report
    Land Registry Annual Report and Accounts 2005/6 Creating a comprehensive Land Register Readers of this report Her Majesty’s Land Registry academics in the field (Land Registry), established the professional and in 1862, is a government national press department in its own right, other government an executive agency and a departments and trading fund that makes no agencies including HM call on monies voted by Treasury and the Cabinet Parliament. By statute, it is Office required to ensure that its land registries overseas income from fees covers all the United Nations, of its expenditure. European Union and World Bank Land Registry comprises the those individuals in Registration of Title institutions with a Department, dealing with its professional interest in main business, and the much public sector smaller Land Charges and management. Agricultural Credits Departments. This report For readers of this report who deals with the departments are not familiar with Land separately but the accounts Registry terms, a glossary are given for Land Registry as has been provided at a whole. Appendix 10. This report is available for online viewing The Secretary of State for on our website at Constitutional Affairs and www.landregistry.gov.uk Lord Chancellor is the Minister responsible for Land Registry. This is the Chief If you would like this Land Registrar’s formal Annual Report and account to the Minister of Land Registry’s performance Accounts in a different against each of the objectives format including audio and key performance targets set by
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a QUANGO?
    What is a QUANGO? Quasi-Autonomous Non-Governmental Organisation. This is a well known name or acronym, dreamed up in the 1960’s. NGO is a term preferred by the government and these organisations are widespread within the EU and world-wide. However, we will concentrate on the UK aspects of these organisations A QUANGO is an organisation that is funded by taxpayers, but not controlled directly by central government. There is nothing controversial about the concept of quangos - they have been around for a long time. Some of Britain's best-known organisations are classified as QUANGO’s: including national galleries and museums, bodies such as the Forestry Commission and the British Council. They are and were created by successive governments and yet the problem, according to who are always threatening to axe them, is the sheer number and how much they cost to run. The UK government's definition in 1997 of a non-departmental public body or QUANGO was: “A body which has a role in the processes of national government, but is not a government department or part of one, and which accordingly operates to a greater or lesser extent at arm's length from Ministers .” So how many quangos are there? Those "non-departmental public bodies" on the Cabinet Office listed total 742 across the UK. However, Wales and Scotland have devolved responsibility for some of their own which are not on the list. A pressure group, the Taxpayers' Alliance, claims the figure is actually 1,162. What do quangos do? They can deliver public services, give advice or regulate behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • SRNWP-V Programme: a Comparison of Regional European Forecast Models
    SRNWP-V programme: a comparison of regional European forecast models Clive Wilson , Marion Mittermaier Sep 2011 © Crown copyright Met Office Outline & motivation • Short Range Numerical Weather Prediction – EUMETNET programme • Desire to benchmark operational models cf CBS global exchange • Phase 1 2009-2010 • Establish framework, recommend methods • Phase 2 2011-2012 • Continue comparison, more parameters • Use radar/extra observations • Extremal measures © Crown copyright Met Office EUMETNET/SRNWP programme - Deliverables • D1: Operational verification comparison of deterministic forecasts from one version of each of the 4 regional models of Europe (available for all the participating members) • D2: Additional intercomparison of other versions of the consortia models including high resolution models • D3: Inventory and recommendations of “new” scale-selective verification methods. • D4: Catalogue of sources of non-GTS data • D5 Exchange methods and code for verification of severe weather forecasts © Crown copyright Met Office 15km 12km 7km 10km 5 km (10km) Hirlam UM COSMO ALADIN Aladin-Lace © Crown copyright Met Office Parameter Scores Mean sea level mean bias and root mean pressure square errors 2m temperature Bias, rmse 2m relative humidity Bias, rmse mean bias speed error 10m winds and root mean square vector wind error equitable threat score and 6 hourly total frequency bias for 0.5, precipitation 1.0 and 4.0 mm 6h -1 © Crown copyright Met Office Key Model Label Hirlam reference run by FMI UK-FI Aladin-France run by Meteo-France
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine Issue 35 | Improvements to the Seasonal Forecast System and the New UK Climate Projections (UKCP18) Which Come out Next Year
    Barometer Magazine issue 35 | www.metoffice.gov.uk improvements to the seasonal forecast system and the new UK Climate Projections (UKCP18) which come out next year. I also refocused the climate science programme Professor Stephen onto both science and services, and substantially increased Belcher, Met Office Chief our international work, for example through the Climate Scientist, describes his Science for Service Partnership China (CSSP China). passion for his new role Capitalising on the new supercomputer and work addressing the Our new supercomputer was delivered ahead of schedule challenges of big data which has meant that many of the latest science upgrades and climate change. are now going operational and are helping to improve our forecasts (page 19). Leading science A new supercomputer also means huge volumes of data. July 2017 Now, data is one thing, but information is another, so we are Barometer is a controlled circulation magazine looking at intelligent ways of creating useful information distributed free of charge to decision-makers in to services government, science and commerce, for whom and extracting value from that data (page 4). That is where weather and climate information has an impact. the science to service aspect comes in. Improvements to Product information is correct at the time of eing Chief Scientist at the Met Office is a wonderful our weather and climate models will enable development publication but may be subject to change. job because of the broad range of science done of better services, particularly relevant in our support of the For queries about Barometer contact: in the Met Office, as well as the world-leading scientists Government’s emerging Industrial Strategy (page 7) and in Jon Stanford who produce it.
    [Show full text]