NEWSLETTER April 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEWSLETTER April 2015 NEWSLETTER April 2015 been translated into seven Highlights in this issue Editorial European languages and will soon be available in three more. We 1 April: AE announces new 2 Welcome! would like to thank our members Expert Advisory Panel April has been for their help on this! We are also 2 April: Malta launches 9 a great month delighted to have received National Dementia Strategy in European signatures from three more MEPs 2 April: Wales unveils new 9 policy terms, this month, two of whom are new dementia plans with Malta members of our European 14 April: WHO states position 10 launching its Alzheimer’s Alliance. If you have on clinical trial results National not already done so, please sign, 23-24 April: MIAMI-MD 3 Dementia Strategy “Empowering using the buttons available in this project kicks off Change”, written by our Honorary newsletter. 30 April: Glasgow Declaration Secretary, Dr Charles Scerri. The 3 is available in eight languages Maltese strategy is the fifteenth On the European project front, national plan to be launched in there was a big kick-off meeting Europe, but the first to include a for the new project, MIAMI-MD at dementia-friendly version. the end of the month, at which we presented our Communication and At the start of the month, the Dissemination plans, as the work Welsh government announced a package leader for that area. AE new drive to improve the lives of team members have also attended people living with dementia. Wales meetings with the NILVAD, launched its national dementia INTERDEM and EPAD projects in plan in 2011, but this recent which we are involved. development aims to do more still to ensure to ensure the nation is Our friends at Alzheimer’s Disease th dementia-friendly. International (ADI) held their 30 annual conference in Australia, Also on the policy front, the World which we were unfortunately Health Organisation (WHO) unable to attend, but which seems published a new statement on the to have been a big success. The Table of contents public disclosure of clinical trial Chairperson of our European results. Working Group of People Editorial .......................................... 1 (EWGPWD), Helga Rohra, For our own part, we are delighted Alzheimer Europe .......................... 2 however, was in attendance and to announce the creation of our gave a well-received presentation. EU Projects .................................... 3 new Expert Advisory Panel. The aim is to improve the information Alzheimer Europe Networking ..... 4 Other big stories in the media this we provide on scientific month have been around a study EAA ................................................. 5 breakthroughs and to include a linking the immune system and a EU Developments......……………..7 commentary on key nutrient called arginine to developments. We are also Alzheimer's disease and a Members’ News ............................. 6 delighted to say that all abstracts landmark US trial, which raised Policy Watch .................................. 9 for the Alzheimer Europe annual questions around dementia and conference, 25 AEC in Ljubljana in sexual consent. Science Watch ............................. 10 September have been reviewed Lastly, we are delighted that our Dementia in society .................... 12 and we will soon finalise the programme. The reduced “Early readers seem very satisfied with New Publications & Resources . 13 Bird” registration fees are only our newsletter, based on survey AE Calendar 2015 ........................ 14 available until the end of May, so results. We would like to thank don’t forget to register! everyone who responded and we Future Conferences 2015 ........... 15 hope you continue to enjoy We have also been busy with our reading our newsletter! Glasgow Declaration campaign. The declaration itself, along with Jean Georges the sign up system, has this month Executive Director Page 1 of 16 Newsletter: April 2015 We are delighted to say the results say our readers are Alzheimer Europe extremely satisfied with all these areas. 1 April: Alzheimer Europe announces new Expert Your support is much appreciated as are the suggestions Advisory Panel some of you made regarding updating our email and PDF templates. We will certainly take this into consideration Alzheimer Europe (AE) is and may make some slight changes later in the year. pleased to announce the creation of its new Expert We would like to thank you for giving your valuable time to respond and we hope you continue to enjoy reading Advisory Panel (EAP). our newsletter! The EAP was envisaged earlier this year, to improve the information AE provides 19 April: The Irish Times reports on Helen on medical and scientific breakthroughs in its newsletter Rochford Brennan and importance of friendship and magazine and to include a “scientific commentary” on On 19 April, The Irish Times key scientific developments. published a story in its Life The EAP will also be involved in the abstracts process for and Style - People section, AE’s annual conferences and - since AE is more and more about Helen Rochford called upon to take part in scientific projects - will also Brennan, Vice-Chair of provide scientific advice on which research programmes Alzheimer Europe (AE)’s and projects to prioritise. European Working Group of People with Dementia The panel is currently composed of 32 advisors from (EWGPWD) and Chair of the around Europe, appointed by AE for a period of 3 years Alzheimer Society of Ireland’s National Dementia Working (2015-2018). Group. http://alzheimer-europe.org/Alzheimer-Europe/Who-we-are/Expert- Advisory-Panel The story relates the importance of Helen’s friendship with her childhood friend, Aggie Kosikowski. It is written 7 April: Ethics and professional dementia care from the persepctives of the two friends, with particular experts start work on ethical dilemma guidelines emphasis on the support and friendship Ms Kosikowski has brought Helen since she was diagnosed with early onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in 2011, at the age of 61. “We are so close, there’s nothing I can’t tell her about: if I’m going through a bad day, I know I can talk to her and when I get off the phone I will be cheered up”, writes Helen. “I’m not surprised that Helen has become a spokesperson for people in Ireland with Alzheimer’s. That’s Helen: she does this because she really wants to help people and put a face on Alzheimer’s at a young age. I am very proud of On 7 April, Alzheimer Europe’s ethics working group met her”, writes Ms Kosikowski. in Luxembourg. This was the first meeting for this year’s ethics project which aims to develop guidelines for http://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/first-encounters-helen- professional carers of people with dementia. rochford-brennan-and-aggie-kosikowski-1.2177073 th The final report will be a training resource for professional 28 April: 25 Alzheimer Europe conference carers to explore ethical dilemmas they may encounter in abstracts evaluated institutional/residential care or the hospital setting. This Abstracts for the 25th work follows on from last year’s report which focused on Alzheimer Europe Annual ethical dilemmas faced by people with dementia and their Conference – taking place in informal carers. Ljubljana, Slovenia from 2 to Next year’s work will address those encountered by 4 September - have been professional carers of people with dementia living at reviewed during the month home. The group, which is comprised of experts in ethics of April. Evaluations will be sent out shortly and the as well as in the provision of professional care and conference programme will be available soon after. dementia research, will meet again in September in If you wish to register for our conference, the Early Bird Slovenia and the report will be available in December. registration fee is still available until end of May. 14 April: AE thanks you for your positive feedback on our newsletter In the first part of 2015, we ran a survey on our monthly newsletter, to collect feedback on the quality of writing, topic areas, user-friendliness and aesthetics, among others. Page 2 of 16 Newsletter: April 2015 30 April: Glasgow Declaration now available in with dementia and carers in different European countries. several European languages The EWGPWD will also participate in the consultation. During the month of April, Alzheimer’s Europe’s AE’s Project Officer, Ana Diaz represented the campaign, the Glasgow Declaration – calling for the organisation at the meetings. creation of a European Dementia Strategy and national 23-24 April: MIAMI-MD project will create app strategies in every country in Europe – has been translated into several European languages. designed to improve quality of life for people with dementia The declaration and online sign-up form have been available in English on our website since 19 February but now, with the help of our members, we have also made it available in French, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Slovenian and Spanish. Croatian, Czech and German will be available very soon. You can find the currently available versions on our website: http://alzheimer-europe.org/Policy-in-Practice2/Glasgow-Declaration- 2014/Other-languages Our Finnish member, Muistiliitto has also translated the Glasgow Declaration, which is available for signing via their own website: On 23-24 April, the kick-off meeting for the MIAMI-MD http://muistiliitto.fi/fi/muistiliitto/tietoa-muistiliitosta/ajankohtaista/kohti- project was hosted by project leader Anglia Ruskin eurooppalaista-muistiohjelmaa/ University (ARU) at its Postgraduate Medical Institute in Chelmsford, UK. The four year project will develop an app called Medical Intelligence for Assistive Management Interface - Mild Dementia (MIAMI-MD), designed specifically to help improve the quality of life of people living with mild EU Projects dementia. 9 April: EPAD project team holds meeting on The app will be designed to help people with mild dissemination activities dementia adhere to treatment regimens as well as allowing them to share health-related data with their The members of EPAD’s carers and doctors.
Recommended publications
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)
    C 107/84 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 19 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 87 2. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (złożone projekty rezolucji) . 87 3. Składanie dokumentów . 87 4. Debata na temat przypadków naruszania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (debata) . 88 4.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach . 88 4.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów . 89 4.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 89 obywatelstwie . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 90 6. Skład komisji i delegacji . 90 7. Głosowanie . 90 7.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach 90 (głosowanie) . 7.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów (głosowanie) . 91 7.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 92 obywatelstwie (głosowanie) . 7.4. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (głosowanie) . 92 7.5. Znaczenie pamięci o przeszłości Europy dla jej przyszłości (głosowanie) . 93 7.6. Stan wdrażania przepisów dotyczących przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy (głosowanie) . 94 8. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 94 9. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 94 10. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 94 11. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 95 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/85 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 12. Skład komisji i delegacji . 95 13. Zagrożenie statusu służb ochotniczej straży pożarnej w Unii Europejskiej (debata) .
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • To: Dr. Ursula Von Der Leyen President of the European Commission Cc: Ms. Věra Jourová Vice-President for Values A
    To: Dr. Ursula von der Leyen President of the European Commission cc: Ms. Věra Jourová Vice-President for Values and Transparency Athens, 16 April 2021 Subject: Ensuring journalists’ safety and physical integrity in the EU Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Jourová, We are writing to you in relation to the brutal killing of the Greek journalist George Karaivaz. It is regrettably another despicable act, which follows the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia in Malta in 2017 and of Ján Kuciak in Slovakia in 2018. Physical threats and violence against journalists have been, unfortunately, on the rise. These crimes can lead to media’s self-censorship and therefore, have a grave chilling effect on freedom of expression, as enshrined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Press has a vital role to play in the functioning of a democratic society. Journalists’ public watchdog role is crucial for a democratic society, based on the rule of law. Moreover, it has an instrumental role in ensuring an open and vigorous public debate, thereby reinforcing the public’s trust in our democratic processes. In this regard, we need to do away with the sense of impunity for crimes against journalists. Therefore, we call upon you to use all means at your disposal towards guaranteeing the safety and physical integrity of journalists in the EU. This includes a swift adoption of a Recommendation on the safety of journalists, as outlined in the 2020 European Democracy Action Plan. The Recommendation should have a significant focus on threats against women journalists, who are also increasingly subject to online and offline threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Annuaire Officiel De L'union Europøenne
    Donnes à jour au 23 dcembre 2004 Annuaire officiel de l’Union europenne 2005 UNION EUROPÉENNE Avis au lecteur Cette publication parat une fois par an, en trois langues: allemand, anglais et franÅais. Son contenu reprend les organigrammes des institutions, organes, agences et organismes de l’Union europenne jusqu’au niveau des responsables des entits oprationnelles de base. Une version lectronique, actualise rgulirement, peut Þtre consulte sur l’internet via le serveur Europa (http://europa.eu.int/idea). En raison du nombre et de la complexit des intituls des fonctions à grer dans les diffrentes versions linguistiques, il ne nous est pas possible, pour l’instant, de prendre en compte les variantes fminin/masculin de celles-ci. Nous avons donc opt pour une dnomination unique à considrer comme neutre. Europe Direct est un service destin à vous aider à trouver des rponses aux questions que vous vous posez sur l’Union europenne. Un nouveau numro unique gratuit: 000 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 De nombreuses autres informations sur l’Union europenne sont disponibles sur l’internet via le serveur Europa (http://europa.eu.int). Une fiche bibliographique figure à la fin de l’ouvrage. Luxembourg: Office des publications officielles des Communauts europennes, 2005 ISBN 92-78-40259-1 Communauts europennes, 2005 Reproduction autorise, moyennant mention de la source Printed in Luxembourg IMPRIM SUR PAPIER BLANCHI SANS CHLORE Table des matires Prsentation des institutions de l’Union europenne .............................. V Renseignements pratiques ...................................................... XVII ˆ Adresses postales des institutions . ........................................ XIX ˆ Liste des btiments . ........................................................ XXIII ˆ Plans d’accs aux btiments .
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Foreign Affairs 2019/2170(INI) 22.12.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 267 Draft report Isabel Santos (PE647.074v01-00) on the 2019-2020 Commission Reports on Albania (2019/2170(INI)) AM\1199417EN.docx PE648.333v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE648.333v01-00 2/119 AM\1199417EN.docx EN Amendment 1 David Lega, Michael Gahler, Vladimír Bilčík, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev Motion for a resolution Citation -1 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Agreement, Or. en Amendment 2 David Lega, Michael Gahler, Vladimír Bilčík, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrey Kovatchev Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the European Council conclusions of 19-20 June 2003 and the Thessaloniki Agenda for the Western Balkans, Or. en Amendment 3 Kinga Gál, Andrea Bocskor, Andor Deli Motion for a resolution Citation 5 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Commission communication of 29 April 2020 entitled ‘Support to the Western Balkans in tackling COVID-19 and the post- pandemic recovery’, Or. en AM\1199417EN.docx 3/119 PE648.333v01-00 EN Amendment 4 Željana Zovko Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Commission communication of 6 October 2020 entitled ‘An Economic and Investment Plan for the Western Balkans’ (COM(2020)0641), Or. en Amendment 5 Kinga Gál, Andrea Bocskor, Andor Deli Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Commission communication of 6 October 2020 entitled ‘An Economic and Investment Plan for the Western Balkans’ (COM(2020)0641), Or.
    [Show full text]
  • Z O2-Ö EM/Al Ares (2020) S 4485676
    European Commission VALDIS DOMBROVSKIS THIERRY BRETON EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMMISSION Brussels, ¿X'Jbb*x~ Z_o2-ö EM/al Ares (2020) s 4485676 Dear Honourable Members, Thank you for your letter of 24 June in which you present your vision for Europe’s raw materials policy. We welcome your initiative and the broad political support for strengthened action on raw materials. President von der Leyen insisted in her presentation of Next Generation EU on the need to increase the resilience and open strategic autonomy of the EU, notably by promoting investment in key value chains that are crucial for our future resilience. In line with the new industrial strategy, the Commission adopted, on 3 September 2020, an action plan on critical raw materials. One of the actions is to create a European Raw Materials Alliance, involving all relevant stakeholders. In addition, the Commission services have published a report looking at critical raw material needs for strategic sectors - such as renewable energy, e- mobility, digitalisation, aerospace and defence - that will be required in 2030 and 2050. The funds allocated to strengthen the EU economy need to be commensurate to the challenges we face. The InvestEU Programme identifies funding for primary and secondary raw materials in the sustainable infrastructure policy window. In addition, Horizon Europe will fund innovation to strengthen market intelligence and development throughout the life cycle of raw materials, i.e. production, recycling and substitution solutions. Non-budgetary policies will also accompany these measures to reinforce the EU open strategic autonomy while also defending our values.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov
    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
    [Show full text]
  • Should the EU Budget Be Increased?
    Should the EU Budget be increased? The vote of the MEPs The European Union budget for next year was voted last month. A large majority of Members of the European Parliament (65%) asked for more money to be allocated to youth initiatives and migration. However, after handing the provisional deal to the Council, concerns were raised since national governments disagreed on increasing the spending from the institutions and tried to block Parliament’s attempt to not make any cuts. By now, an agreement between the Council and the European Parliament was reached and secures 500million more for the Youth Employment Initiative and a package of 750million redirected to migration related funds. Several groups in the EP supported the increase: the EPP, S&D, ALDE, the Greens and even a part of ECR. Instead, the Eurosceptic groups EFDD, ENF and most of ECR opposed the initiative, whereas the far left was split between voting against and abstaining. The vote on the EU budget for 2017 proved to be quite controversial, as Greece was the most divided country on this issue. However, the majority of Greek MEPs remained loyal to their political groups. The support for the new budget came from the members of PASOK and the River as well as the MEPs from New Democracy. Instead, the Greek members of GUE-NGL, including one independent and all the members of Syriza and Popular Unity were skeptical towards the new budget, as they all decided to abstain. However, it has to be noticed that a big part of their political group voted against the budget, therefore the Greek members adopted a more moderate position in this case.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint MEP Letter to Germany to Suspend Submarine Export to Turkey
    Her Excellency Mrs. Angela Merkel Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Bundeskanzleramt Willy-Brandt-Straße 1 10557 Berlin - Germany 9 December 2020 Joint MEP letter to Germany to suspend submarine export to Turkey Dear Chancellor, in the light of ongoing tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean, as Greek and German Members of the European Parliament we call on the German government to immediately suspend the export of German submarines, its components and spare parts as well as all related maintenance activities. Our appeal follows the European Parliament’s resolution of 17 September 2020 on Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (para 17) which: calls on the VP / HR, for as long as Turkey continues with its current illegal, unilateral actions in the Eastern Mediterranean that run counter to the sovereignty of any EU Member State (notably Greece and Cyprus) and international law, and does not engage in dialogue based on international law, to introduce an initiative in the Council for all EU Member States to halt arms export licensing to Turkey in accordance with the Common Position Turkey’s recent explorative activities for natural gas deposits has led to an escalation of a simmering dispute between Turkey and Greece over maritime rights in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. We are extremely concerned about Turkey’s threats of military action against EU Member States in the Eastern Mediterranean and fear that Turkey could employ submarines produced in Germany in this conflict. Therefore, we urge the German government to undertake urgent measures to suspend in relation to Turkey the export of submarines, its components and spare parts - largely produced by German Thyssen Krupp Marine Systems and assembled in Turkey – as well as related maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the Future Engagement of the EU in Healthcare We, The
    Statement on the future engagement of the EU in healthcare We, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are deeply concerned about the prospect of reducing EU engagement in the area of healthcare outlined by some of the scenarios in the “White Paper on the Future of Europe”. European integration has brought considerable benefits for the health of Europeans. This cooperation must be sustained to ensure that citizens across the EU enjoy equality of opportunity to receive quality health care and services in their country. Patients should not pay the cost of non-Europe in healthcare! We believe that Europe is about more than a common market and currency. Strengthening the economic foundations of the European project is undoubtedly crucial, but it remains merely a means of achieving prosperity in the Union. Health is a precondition for prosperity and the ambitious European agenda for growth and jobs cannot be achieved without healthy European citizens. European health systems are struggling to respond to the pressing challenges of ageing populations, strained health budgets and rising levels of health inequalities. These challenges transcend national borders and call for common European solutions. Ignoring them would not only be economically inefficient, but also politically dangerous. Wide disparities in health undermine social cohesion and foster political discontent, thus hindering cooperation and the process of European integration. In order to secure the future of the European Union we need to counter populist rhetoric and deliver on the expectations of European citizens. Recent Eurobarometer surveys have consistently shown that around 70% of Europeans wish to see more EU engagement in the area of health.
    [Show full text]
  • Groups Committees Delegations T H E
    INSIDE Groups Committees Delegations T H E PARLIA September 2014 ME follow us on NT MA @Parlimag G AZIN E • Issue MEP Photo Guide 2014 MEP PHOTO GUIDE 01 MEP Photo Guid 2014 V3.indd 1 17/09/2014 14:16:52 The LERU universities are: The League of European Research Universities LERU regularly publishes its views on research University of Amsterdam (LERU) is a network of 21 leading research- and higher education in several types of Universitat de Barcelona intensive universities based in 10 countries publications. University of Cambridge around Europe. University of Edinburgh We share the values of high-quality teaching Facts & Figures University of Freiburg within an environment of internationally • LERU universities account for more than Université de Genève competitive research. 550.000 students, including 50.000 PhD Universität Heidelberg candidates. University of Helsinki LERU is a prominent advocate for the promotion • The total research budget of LERU’s members Universiteit Leiden of basic research at European Research exceeds €5 billion. KU Leuven Universities. We strongly believe that basic • More than 20% of ERC grants have been Imperial College London research plays an essential role in the innovation awarded to researchers at LERU universities. University College London process and significantly contributes to the • Over 230 Nobel Prize and Field Medal winners Lund University progress of society. We aim at furthering the have studied or worked at LERU universities. University of Milan understanding and knowledge of politicians, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München policy makers and opinion leaders about the role University of Oxford and activities of research-intensive universities.
    [Show full text]