Index Name Designation Page Active Magnetospheric Particle Tracer Explorers: See AMPTE Advanced Meteorological Satellite: See AM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Index Name Designation Page Active Magnetospheric Particle Tracer Explorers: See AMPTE Advanced Meteorological Satellite: See AM Index Name Designation Page Name Designation Page A Apollo 13 1970-29A 223 Active Magnetospheric II 14 1971-08A 250 Particle Tracer Explorers: II 15 1971-63A 266 see AMPTE II 16 1972-31A 294 Advanced Meteorological II 17 1972-96A 316 Satellite: see AMS II 18 (ASTP) 1975-66A 412 Advanced Space Technology Apollo Model 1 1964-25A 51 II II 2 Experiments: see ASTEX 1964-57A 60 AE-B 1966-44A 108 II II 3 1965-09B 68 AE-C 1973-lOlA 352 II II 4 1965-39B 78 II II 5 AE-D 1975-96A 421 1965-60B 84 AE-E 1975-107A 425 Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: AEM 1 1978-41A 529 see ASTP II 2 1979-13A 562 Apple · 1981-57B 650 Aeros 1 1972-lOOA 318 Applications Explorer II 2 1974-55A 373 Mission: see AEM Agena: see Atlas Agena Applications Technology Thor Agena Satellite: see ATS Thorad Agena Arabsat lA 1985-15A 819 Titan Agena II 1B 1985-48C 832 Ajisai 1986-61A 879 Ariane 1-01 1979-104A 593 Alouette 1 1962 Pal 27 II 1-03 1981-57A 650 II 2 1965-98A 94 II 1-04 1981-122A 674 Altair: see Thor Altair II 1-06 1983-58A 738 American Satellite Co: II 1-07 1983-105A 757 see ASC II 1-08 1984-23A 774 American Telegraph & II 1-09 1984-49A 784 Telephone Co: see II 1-10 1985-56B 835 Telstar II 1-11 1986-19A 865 AMPTE 1984-88 798 II 3-01 1984-81A 796 AMS 1 1976-91A 462 II 3-02 1984-114A 809 II 2 1977-44A 490 II 3-03 1985-15A 819 II 3 1978-42A 529 " 3-04 1985-35A 826 II 4 1979-SOA 574 " 3 ... os 1986-26A 867 Anik 1 1972-90A 314 Ariane passenger payload II 2 1973-23A 327 experiment: see Apple II 3 1975-38A 402 Ariel 1 1962 o1 20 II Cl 1985-28B 824 II 2 1964-15A 49 II C2 1983-59B 739 II 3 1967-42A 135 II C3 1982-110C 115 II 4 1971-109A 281 II Dl 1982-82A 704 II 5 1974-77A 380 II ·D2 1984-113B 808 II 6 1979-47A 573 Anik: see Telesat Army, Navy, NASA, Air Force: Anna lB 1962 /Jjil 28 see Anna ANS 1 1974-70A 377 Aryabhata 1975-33A 400 Anti-Satellite: see ASAT ASAT: see lTV Apollo 3 1966-59A 112 Satellite Interceptor II 4 1967-113A 152 Solwind II 5 1968-07B 157 ASC-1 1985-76C 842 II 6 1968-25A 161 Asterix 1 1965-96A 94 II 7 1968-89A 177 ASTEX 1971-89A 275 II 8 1968-118A 184 ASTP 1975-65A 411 II II 9 1969-18A 189 1975-66A 412 II 10 1969-43A 196 ASTRO 1 1981-17A 637 II 2 II 11 1969-59A 200 1983-llA 722 II 12 1969-99A 212 Astron 1 1983-20A 726 895 Index Name Designation Page Name Designation Page Astronomical Netherlands ATS 1 1966-llOA 122 Satellite: see ANS II 2 1967-JlA 132 Atcos 2 1967-120A 154 II J 1967-lllA 152 ATDA 1966-46A 108 " 4 1968-68A 172 Atlantis Fl 1985-92A 848 II 5 1969-69A 203 " F2 1985-109A 854 II 6 1974-39A 368 Atlas 1958 ~ 2 Augmented Target Docking Atlas Agena 1968-63A 171 Adaptor: see ATDA Atlas Agena B 1961 all 17 Aura (D2-B) 1975-92A 420 II II 1962 '11 19 Aureole 1 1971-119A 284 II II 1962 nl 20 II 2 1973-107A 355 II II 1962 tpl 22 II J 1981-94A 664 II II 1962 a~l 23 Aurora 1 1967-65B 141 II II 1962 all 24 II 7 1962 Tl 21 " " 1962 (Jrr 1 29 Aurorae 1968-84A 176 Atlas Agena D 1963-28A 38 Aussat 1 1985-76B 842 " " 1963-36A 39 II 2 1985-109C 854 " " 1963-41A 41 Australia: see Aussat " " 1963-51A 43 Oscar 5 " " 1964-09A 47 Wresat " " 1964-12A 48 Ayame 1 1979-09A 561 " " 1964-20A 50 II 2 1980-18A 600 " " 1964-24A 51 Azur 1969-97A 212 II II 1964-36A 54 " " 1964-45A 56 II II 1964-58A 60 B " " 1964-68A 62 Ballistic Missile Early II II 1964-79A 64 II II Warning Satellite: 1965-05A 67 see BMEWS " " 1965-19A 72 Balloon (Mylar) 1971-67F 268 II II 1965-JlA 76 II II Balloon Satellites: 1965-41A 78 see Dash 1 & 2, Echo 1 & 2 II II 1965-50B 81 II II China 9A 1965-62A 84 Explorer 9, 19, 24, 39 II II 1965-76A 89 II II Pageos 1 1965-90A 92 Beacon B 1964-64A 61 II II 1966-02A 98 II c 1965-32A 76 II II 1966-12A 100 Bhaskara 1 1979-51A 575 II II 1966-22A 103 II 2 1981-115A 671 II II 1966-32A 105 Big Bird: see Titan 3D II II 1966-39A 107 II II Biological Satellites: 1966-48A 109 see Bios Capsule II 1966-62A 112 II Cosmos 4 1966-74A 115 II 7 II 1966-83A 117 II 92 1966-90A 118 94 II 1966-98A 120 II 605 1966-109A 122 690 II 1967-07A 127 II II 782 1967-50A 137 936 II II 1967-55A 139 II II 1129 1977-38A 488 1514 II II 1977-114A 513 II II " 1667 1978-38A 528 Discoverer Atmospheric Composition 29 Mercury 5 Satellite: see Atcos OFO 1 Atmospheric Explorer: See AE 896 Index Name Designation Page Name Designation Page Salyut 1 Capsule Ariane Techno­ Sputnik 2 logique: see CAT II 6 Capsule: see CAT II 9 China 12 II 10 II 16 II 14 II 17 II 17 II 19 Bios 1 Capsule 1966-114A 123 footnote to Cosmos II 2 II 1967-83A 145 Capsule (USAF) 1963-42B 41 II II 3 II 1969-56D 199 1963-55B 44 Bluebell 2 1966-12 100 II 1964-36B 54 BMEWS 1 1968-63A 171 II 1964-68B 62 II II 2 1969-36A 194 1965-31B 76 II II 3 1970-46A 228 1965-50A 81 II II 4 1970-69A 234 1965-62B 84 II II 5 1972-101A 318 1966-39B 107 II 6 1973-13A 324 1966-74B 115 Boreas 1969-83A 208 1966-83B 117 Brasilsat 1 1985-15B 819 1967-43B 135 II 2 1986-26B 867 1967-62B 140 Britain: see Ariel 1967-109B 152 IRAS 1968-08B 157 Miranda 1968-20B 160 Prospero 1968-52B 168 Skynet 1968-78B 174 UKS 1968-112B 182 UOSAT 1969-10B 187 Broadcasting Satellite: see BS II 1969-26B 192 Broadcasting Satellite II 1969-41B 195 Experiment: see BSE II 1969-79B 206 BS-2A 1984-05A 767 II 1969-82A 207 BS-2B 1986-16A 864 II 1970-16B 220 BSE 1 1978-39A 528 II 1970-40B 227 Bulgaria: see Soyuz 33 II 1970-98B 242 Bulgaria 1300 1981-75A 658 II 1971-76B 270 II 1972-02D 285 II 1972-52C 301 c II 1972-79C 310 II 1973-88B 348 Calibration cone 1969-82K 208 II 1973-88D 348 Calibration cylinder 1969-82J 208 II 1974-20B 361 Calibration sphere: II 1974-20C 361 see.Calsphere II 1974-85B 383 Calsphere 1 1964-63C 61 II 1975-114B 427 II 2 1964-63E 61 II 1976-65C 454 II 3 1971-12C 251 II 1976-125B 474 II 4 1971-12D 251 II 1976-125D 474 II 5 1971-12E 251 II 1978-29B 525 CAMEO 1978-98B 549 II 1979-25B 567 Canada: see Alouette II 1982-41C 689 Anik II 1983-60C 740 CTS II 1984-65C 790 Isis Castor (D5B) 1975-39B 402 STS-41G CAT 1 1979-104A 593 Telesat II 3 1981-57C 651 Cannonball 1 1968-59B 170 II 4 1981-122B 674 II 2 1971-67C 267 CCE 1 1984-88A 798 897 Index ~ Designation Page Name Designation Page Celestial Observation Corsa B 1979-14A 563 Satellite: see COS COS B 1975-72A 413 Centaur 2 1963-47A 42 Cosmic Radiation Satellite: II 4 1964-82A 65 see Corsa II 6 1965-64B 85 Cosmic Ray Package A 1968-53G 168 II 8 1966-30B 105 II II II B 1971-57G 264 CEP 1 1970-106B 244 II II II c 1972-36D 296 Challenger F1 1983-26A 728 Co mos 1 1962 81 19 II F2 1983-59A 739 2 1962 t1 19 II F3 1983-89A 751 3 1962 v1 20 II F4 1984-11A 768 4 1962 u 20 II F5 1984-34A 778 5 1962 u1 21 II F6 1984-108A 807 6 1962 adl 23 II F7 1985-34A 826 7 1962 at1 24 II F8 1985-63A 837 8 1962 aU 25 II F9 1985-104A 852 9 1962 awl 26 Char·ge Composition Explorer: 10 1962 (1,1 27 see CCE 11 1962 (181 28 Chemically active materials 12 1962 (Jwl 31 ejected in orbit: 13 1963-06A 32 see CAMEO 14 1963-10A 33 China 1 1970-34A 225 15 1963-llA 33 2 1971-18A 253 16 1963-12A 34 3 1975-70A 413 17 1963-17A 35 4 1975-111A 426 18 1963-18A 35 5 1975-119A 428 19 1963-33A 39 6 1976-87A 460 20 1963-40A 40 7 1976-117A 471 21 1963-44A 41 8 1978-llA 520 22 1963-45A 42 9 1981-93A 664 23 1963-50A 43 10 1981-93B 664 24 1963-52A 43 11 1981-93D 664 25 1964-lOA 47 12 1982-90A 707 26 1964-13A 48 13 1983-86A 750 27 1964-14A 48 14 1984-08A 768 28 1964-17A 49 15 1984-35A 719 29 1964-21A 50 16 1984-98A 803 30 1964-23A 51 17 1985-96A 849 31 1964-28A 52 18 1986-10A 862 32 1964-29A 52 19 1986-76A 884 33 1964-33A 53 Co umbia Fl 1981-34A 643 34 1964-34A 53 F2 1981-111A 670 35 1964-39A 55 F3 1982-22A 683 36 1964-42A 55 F4 1982-65A 698 37 1964-44A 56 F5 1982-llOA 714 38 1964-46A 57 F6 1983-116A 760 39 1964-46B 57 F7 1986-0JA 860 40 1964-46C 57 Conununications Satellite: 41 1964-49D 58 see CS 42 1964-50A 58 Conununications Technology 43 1964-50C 58 Satellite: see CTS 44 1964-53A 59 Comstar 1A 1976-42A 446 45 1964-55A 59 II 1B 1976-73A 456 46 1964-59A 60 II 1C 1978-68A 539 47 1964-62A 61 II 1D 1981-lSA 637 48 1964-66A 62 Copernicus 1 1972-65A 306 II 49 1964-69A 63 II 500 1973-22A 326 II 50 1964-70A 63 898 Index Name Designation Page Name Designation Page Cosmos 108 1966-11A 100 Cosmos 51 1964-80A 65 II 109 1966-14A 101 II 52 1965-0lA 67 II llO 1966-15A 101 II 53 1965-06A 68 II lll 1966-17A 102 II 54 1965-11A 69 II ll2 1966-21A 103 II 55 1965-11B 69 ll3 1966-23A 103 II 56 1965-11C 69 ll4 1966-28A 104 II 57 1965-12A 69 ll5 1966-33A 105 II 58 1965-14A 70 ll6 1966-36A 106 II 59 1965-15A 70 ll7 1966-37A 106 II 60 1965-18A 72 118 1966-38A 107 II 61 1965-20A 73 119 1966-43A 108 62 1965-20B 73 II 120 1966-SOA 109 63 1965-20C 73 II 121 1966-54A 111 64 1965-25A 74 II 122 1966-57A 111 65 1965-29A 75 II 123 1966-61A 112 66 1965-35A II 71 124 1966-64A 113 67 1965-40A 78 II 125 1966-67A 113 68 1965-46A 80 II 126 1966-68A 114 II 69 1965-49A 81 II 127 1966-71A 114 II 70 1965-52A 81 II 128 1966-79A 116 II 71 1965-53A 82 " 129 1966-91A 118 II 72 1965-53B 82 II 130 1966-93A 119 73 1965-53C II 82 131 1966-105A 121 74 1965-53D 82 II 132 1966-106A 121 75 1965-53E II 82 133 1966-107A 122 76 1965-59A 83 II 134 1966-108A 122 77 1965-61A 84 II 135 1966-112A 123 78 1965-66A 86 II 136 1966-115A 124 79 1965-69A 87 II 137 1966-117A 124 80 1965-70A II 87 138 1967-04A 126 81 1965-70B 87 II 139 1967-0SA 126 82 1965-70C 87 II 140 1967-09A 127 83 1965-70D 87 141 1967-12A 128 84 1965-70E 87 II" 142 1967-13A 128 85 1965-71A 88 II 143 1967-17A 129 86 1965-73A II 88 144 1967-18A 129 87 1965-73B 88 II 145 1967-19A 129 88 1965-73C 88 II 146 1967-21A 130 89 1965-73D II 88 147 1967-22A 130 90 1965-73E 88 II 148 1967-23A 130 91 1965-75A 89 II 149 1967-24A 131 92 1965-83A 90 II 150 1967-25A 131 93 1965-84A 91 II 151 1967-27A 132
Recommended publications
  • Collezione Per Genova
    1958-1978: 20 anni di sperimentazioni spaziali in Occidente La collezione copre il ventennio 1958-1978 che è stato particolarmente importante nella storia della esplorazio- ne spaziale, in quanto ha posto le basi delle conoscenze tecnico-scientifiche necessarie per andare nello spa- zio in sicurezza e per imparare ad utilizzare le grandi potenzialità offerte dallo spazio per varie esigenze civili e militari. Nel clima di guerra fredda, lo spazio è stato fin dai primi tempi, utilizzato dagli Americani per tenere sotto con- trollo l’avversario e le sue dotazioni militari, in risposta ad analoghe misure adottate dai Sovietici. Per preparare le missioni umane nello spazio, era indispensabile raccogliere dati e conoscenze sull’alta atmo- sfera e sulle radiazioni che si incontrano nello spazio che circonda la Terra. Dopo la sfida lanciata da Kennedy, gli Americani dovettero anche prepararsi allo sbarco dell’uomo sulla Luna ed intensificarono gli sforzi per conoscere l’ambiente lunare. Fin dai primi anni, le sonde automatiche fecero compiere progressi giganteschi alla conoscenza del sistema solare. Ben presto si imparò ad utilizzare i satelliti per la comunicazione intercontinentale e il supporto alla navigazio- ne, per le previsioni meteorologiche, per l’osservazione della Terra. La Collezione testimonia anche i primi tentativi delle nuove “potenze spaziali” che si avvicinano al nuovo mon- do dei satelliti, che inizialmente erano monopolio delle due Superpotenze URSS e USA. L’Italia, con San Mar- co, diventò il terzo Paese al mondo a lanciare un proprio satellite e allestì a Malindi la prima base equatoriale, che fu largamente utilizzata dalla NASA. Alla fine degli anni ’60 anche l’Europa entrò attivamente nell’arena spaziale, lanciando i propri satelliti scientifici e di telecomunicazione dalla propria base equatoriale di Kourou.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Situation Report
    NASA Office of Public Affairs Satellite Situation Report VOLUME 17 NUMBER 6 DECEMBER 31, 1977 (NASA-TM-793t5) SATELLITE SITUATION~ BEPORT, N8-17131 VOLUME 17, NO. 6 (NASA) 114 F HC A06/mF A01 CSCL 05B Unclas G3/15 05059 Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland NOTICE .THIS DOCUMENT HAS'BEEN REPRODUCED FROM THE BEST COPY FURNISHED US BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN PORTIONS' ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE. OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS GCDDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION VOLUME 17 NO. 6 DECEMBER 31, 1977 SATELLITE SITUATION REPORT THIS REPORT IS PUBLIShED AND DISTRIBUTED BY THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, GSFC. GODPH DRgP2 FE I T ERETAO5MUJS E SMITHSONIAN ASTRCPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY. SPACEFLIGHT TRACKING AND DATA NETWORK. NOTE: The Satellite Situation Report dated October 31, 1977, contained an entry in the "Objects Decayed Within the Reporting Period" that 1977 042P, object number 10349, decayed on September 21, 1977. That entry was in error. The object is still in orbit. SPACE OBJECTS BOX SCORE OBJECTS IN ORBIT DECAYED OBJECTS AUSTRALIA I I CANACA 8 0 ESA 4 0 ESRO 1 9 FRANCE 54 26 FRANCE/FRG 2 0 FRG 9 3 INCIA 1 0 INDONESIA 2 0 INTERNATIONAL TELECOM- MUNICATIONS SATELLITE ORGANIZATION (ITSO) 22 0 ITALY 1 4 JAPAN 27 0 NATC 4 0 NETHERLANDS 0 4 PRC 6 14 SPAIN 1 0 UK 11 4 US 2928 1523 USSR 1439 4456 TOTAL 4E21 6044 INTER- CBJECTS IN ORIT NATIONAL CATALOG PERIOD INCLI- APOGEE PERIGEE TQANSMITTTNG DESIGNATION NAME NUMBER SOURCE LAUNCH MINUTES NATION KM.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Iowa Instruments in Space
    University of Iowa Instruments in Space A-D13-089-5 Wind Van Allen Probes Cluster Mercury Earth Venus Mars Express HaloSat MMS Geotail Mars Voyager 2 Neptune Uranus Juno Pluto Jupiter Saturn Voyager 1 Spaceflight instruments designed and built at the University of Iowa in the Department of Physics & Astronomy (1958-2019) Explorer 1 1958 Feb. 1 OGO 4 1967 July 28 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Launch Date Launch Date Launch Date Spacecraft Spacecraft Spacecraft Explorer 3 (U1T9)58 Mar. 26 Injun 5 1(U9T68) Aug. 8 (UT) ExpEloxrpelro r1e r 4 1915985 8F eJbu.l y1 26 OEGxOpl o4rer 41 (IMP-5) 19697 Juunlye 2 281 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Explorer 2 (launch failure) 1958 Mar. 5 OGO 5 1968 Mar. 4 Van Allen Probe A * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 3er 1 1915985 8M Oarc. t2. 611 InEjuxnp lo5rer 45 (SSS) 197618 NAouvg.. 186 Van Allen Probe B * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 4er 2 1915985 8Ju Nlyo 2v.6 8 EUxpKlo 4r e(rA 4ri1el -(4IM) P-5) 197619 DJuenc.e 1 211 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 1 * 2015 Mar. 12 ExpPloiorenre 5e r 3 (launch failure) 1915985 8A uDge.c 2. 46 EPxpiolonreeerr 4130 (IMP- 6) 19721 Maarr.. 313 HMEaRgCnIe CtousbpeShaetr i(cF oMxu-1ltDis scaatelell itMe)i ssion / 2 * 2021081 J5a nM. a1r2. 12 PionPeioenr e1er 4 1915985 9O cMt.a 1r.1 3 EExpxlpolorerer r4 457 ( S(IMSSP)-7) 19721 SNeopvt.. 1263 HMaalogSnaett oCsupbhee Sriact eMlluitlet i*scale Mission / 3 * 2021081 M5a My a2r1. 12 Pioneer 2 1958 Nov. 8 UK 4 (Ariel-4) 1971 Dec. 11 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 4 * 2015 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautics and Space Report of the President, 1976 Activities
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 19 76 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1976 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Table of Contents Page Page I. Summary of U.S. Aeronautics and Space Ac- X. National Academy of Sciences, National Acad- tivities of 1976 _________________________ 1 emy .of Engineering, National Research 67 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ 1 Council _______________________________ Space _______________________________ 1 Introduction _ _ _____ _ ______ __ _ ______ __ 67 Aeronautics __ __________ ____ __________ 4 Aerospace Science _ _ _ __ - _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ - - - 67 The Heritage ________________________ 5 Space Applications .................... 69 .. 70 11. National Aeronautics and Space Administration G Aerospace Engineering _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ - - - - - 6 Education ____________________-------71 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 72 Applications to Earth __________________ 6 XI. Office of Telecommunications Policy __i____-- 10 Introduction __ __ __________ _____ ____ __ 72 Science ______________________________ 72 Space Transportation __________________ 15 International Satellite Systems _____ _ _____ 18 Direct Broadcast Satellites ______________ 72 Space Research and Technology _ _ ___ ____ 73 Tracking and Data Acquisition __________ 19 Frequency Management _____ __ _ __ _ ___ __ 20 Domestic Satellite Applications __________ 73 International Affairs ___________________ 74 User Affairs ________________________ 23 XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Satcom for Net-Centric Warfare November/December 2010 Milsatmagazine
    SatCom For Net-Centric Warfare November/December 2010 MilsatMagazine Ka-band Mounted Battle Command On-The-Move Photo courtesy of EM Solutions milsatmagazine pAYLOAD — nov/dec 2010 CHRONICLES intel The Orbiting Vehicles Series: OV2 + Onwards Satellites + Remotely Piloted Aircraft by Jos Heyman ......................................26 Colonel Keith W. Balts, USAF .................04 Iran: Space Launch Capabilities Tiffany Chow ........................................50 COMMAND CENTER Securing Tactical Mobile Networks Martin Roesch .......................................63 James Ramsey, President MTN Government Services MilsatMagazine Editors .........................38 focus The Antenna Challenge William Hafner & James Montgomery .....18 Enhanced Situational Awareness Rick Lober ............................................34 Enhancing Mobility Through COTM Karl Fuchs ............................................45 The Importance Of Compression Sandy Johnson ......................................58 Mission Critical Audio Conferencing Sudhir Gupta ........................................68 2 MILSATMAGAZINE — SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2010 Satellites + Remotely Piloted Aircraft Colonel Keith W. Balts, USAF .................04 Iran: Space Launch Capabilities Tiffany Chow ........................................50 intel Satellites + Remotely Piloted Aircraft author: Colonel Keith W. Balts, U.S.A.F. Vice-commander, 30th space wing, vandenberg afb Advances in technology allow modern in person and on the battlefield, the forces to fight battles at extreme
    [Show full text]
  • L RES~ARCH Coljncll ·
    NA~IOf\i'At ACADEMIES OF SCIENCE AND ENGiNEERING 7 ·.· ·.·. : NATIONAL RES~ARCH ColJNCll · of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED• STATES NATIONAL COMMITTEEI . International Union of Radio Sden<:e Nationa.1 Radio Science Meeting 13-15 January 1982 · f l··.. ·· Sponsored by USNC/URSI in cooperation with r Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers University of· Colorado Boulder, Colorado U.S.A. ~· 1' National Radio Science Meeting 13-15 January 19 82 Condensed Technical Program TUESDAY, 12 JANUARY 0900 CCIR U.S. Study Group 5 OT 8-8 CCIR U.S. Study ,Gr.oup 6 Radio Building 2000-2400 USNC/URSI Meeting Broker Inn WEDNESDAY, 13 JANUARY 0900-1200 A-1 Time Domai~ 1-ieasurements CRl-42 B-1 Scattering CR2-28 B-2 Electromagnetic Theory CR2-28 C-1 Topics in Information Theory CR0-30 F-1 Propagation Theory and Models CR2-26 J-1 Millimeter-Wave Astronomy UMC Ballroom 1330-1700 A-2 Microwave/Millimeter Wave Measurements CRl-42 B-3 Antenna Theory and Practice CR2-28 B-4 Inverse Scattering CR2-6 C-2 Digital HF: Equaltz ation and Reiated CR0-30 Techniques E-1 EM Noise in the Sea CRl-40 F-2 Ground-Based Remote Sensing CR2-26 H-1 VLF-ELF Wave Injection Into the CRl-46 Magnetosphere J-2 Very Long Baseline Interferometry UMC 157 1700 Commission A Business Meeting CRl-42 Commission C Business Meeting CR0-30 Commission E Business Meeting CRl-40 Commission F Business Meeting CR2-26 Commission H Business Meeting CRl-46 1800-2000 Reception Engineering Center 2000-2200 IEEE Wave Propagation Standards Committee CRl-46 TH.URSDAY, 14 JANUARY 0830-1200 A-3
    [Show full text]
  • Novell® Platespin® Recon 3.7.4 User Guide 5.6.4 Printing and Exporting Reports
    www.novell.com/documentation User Guide Novell® PlateSpin® Recon 3.7.4 September 2012 Legal Notices Novell, Inc., makes no representations or warranties with respect to the contents or use of this documentation, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc., reserves the right to revise this publication and to make changes to its content, at any time, without obligation to notify any person or entity of such revisions or changes. Further, Novell, Inc., makes no representations or warranties with respect to any software, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc., reserves the right to make changes to any and all parts of Novell software, at any time, without any obligation to notify any person or entity of such changes. Any products or technical information provided under this Agreement may be subject to U.S. export controls and the trade laws of other countries. You agree to comply with all export control regulations and to obtain any required licenses or classification to export, re-export or import deliverables. You agree not to export or re-export to entities on the current U.S. export exclusion lists or to any embargoed or terrorist countries as specified in the U.S. export laws. You agree to not use deliverables for prohibited nuclear, missile, or chemical biological weaponry end uses. See the Novell International Trade Services Web page (http://www.novell.com/info/exports/) for more information on exporting Novell software.
    [Show full text]
  • Landsat 4 with Previous Landsats
    P saM~~~ilableunder NASA ~PnSOrsnlb in h, interest of early and wide dfi. %.ination of Earth Resources Surrey Program ini~rnatbnand wUN~hub for any use made t :. :d." 1 LANDSAT-4 MULTISPECTRAL SCANNER (MSS) SUBSYSTEM RADIOMETRIC CHARACTERIZATION (E83- 10226) LhbDShT-4 bULTISPECTEAL SCAPiYEB N83-L 1467 jbSS) SUbSYSTEH LAbIOPIETBXC CHABACTEkILATION (hAsA) 77 p dc A05/UP A31 CSCL l4R U ncla s RECtt v cD cc NASA ST1 FAClUM ACCESS DEPT. FEBRUARY 1983 ORIGINAL PAOF: IS OF POOR QUELrrY - NfEA - NIlWWl~bcs~ld GOOOARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER *' swai GREENBELT, MARYLAHO I LANDSAT-4 MULTISPECTRAL SCANNER ( MSS) SUBSYSTEM RADIOMETRIC CHARACTERIZATiON Editors W. Alford and J. Barker NASAlGoddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland B. P. Clark and R. Dasgupta Computer Sciences Corporation 8728 ColesviUe Road Sdver Spring, Maryland GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Greenbelt. Maryland FOREWORD .The authcrs wish to acknow!edge the support received from both government and contract per- sonnel associated with the Landsa t-4 program. Constructive discussions and useful data have been provided by both W. Webb and J. Bala of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Outside contractor support was provided by L. Beuhler from Operations Research, In- corporated, and by J. Dietz and P. Mallerbe from the General Electric corporation. Many general references to the Landsat program iue available to the public. Relevant information and data from these references have been extracted for incorporation :-t, this document. It is hoped that this will broaden the circulation of critical information crur',zd in these documents. Of particular interest are four publications, two by the Hughes Aircraft Company and two by the General Electric Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge Low Earth Orbit
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE LOW EARTH ORBIT BUSINESS CENTER A Project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering by Dallas Gene Bienhoff May 1985 The Proj'ectof Dallas Gene Bienhoff is approved: Dr. B. J. Bluth Professor T1mothy Wm. Fox - Chair California State University, Northridge ii iii ACKNOWLEDGEHENTS I wish to express my gratitude to those who have helped me over the years to complete this thesis by providing encouragement, prodding and understanding: my advisor, Tim Fox, Chair of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering; Dr. B. J. Bluth for her excellent comments on human factors; Dr. B. J. Campbell for improving the clarity; Richard Swaim, design engineer at Rocketdyne Division of Rockwell International for providing excellent engineering drawings of LEOBC; Mike Morrow, of the Advanced Engineering Department at Rockwell International who provided the Low Earth Orbit Business Center panel figures; Bob Bovill, a commercial artist, who did all the artistic drawings because of his interest in space commercialization; Linda Martin for her word processing skills; my wife, Yolanda, for egging me on without nagging; and finally Erik and Danielle for putting up with the excuse, "I have to v10rk on my paper," for too many years. iv 0 ' PREFACE The Low Earth Orbit Business Center (LEOBC) was initially conceived as a modular structure to be launched aboard the Space Shuttle, it evolved to its present configuration as a result of research, discussions and the desire to increase the efficiency of space utilization. Although the idea of placing space stations into Earth orbit is not new, as is discussed in the first chapter, and the configuration offers nothing new, LEOBC is unique in its application.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/2/95 Rev EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Report, Entitled "Hazard
    10/2/95 rev EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, entitled "Hazard Analysis of Commercial Space Transportation," is devoted to the review and discussion of generic hazards associated with the ground, launch, orbital and re-entry phases of space operations. Since the DOT Office of Commercial Space Transportation (OCST) has been charged with protecting the public health and safety by the Commercial Space Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-575), it must promulgate and enforce appropriate safety criteria and regulatory requirements for licensing the emerging commercial space launch industry. This report was sponsored by OCST to identify and assess prospective safety hazards associated with commercial launch activities, the involved equipment, facilities, personnel, public property, people and environment. The report presents, organizes and evaluates the technical information available in the public domain, pertaining to the nature, severity and control of prospective hazards and public risk exposure levels arising from commercial space launch activities. The US Government space- operational experience and risk control practices established at its National Ranges serve as the basis for this review and analysis. The report consists of three self-contained, but complementary, volumes focusing on Space Transportation: I. Operations; II. Hazards; and III. Risk Analysis. This Executive Summary is attached to all 3 volumes, with the text describing that volume highlighted. Volume I: Space Transportation Operations provides the technical background and terminology, as well as the issues and regulatory context, for understanding commercial space launch activities and the associated hazards. Chapter 1, The Context for a Hazard Analysis of Commercial Space Activities, discusses the purpose, scope and organization of the report in light of current national space policy and the DOT/OCST regulatory mission.
    [Show full text]
  • F, I3/ M EARTH VIEW: a Business Guide to Orbital Remote Sensing
    _Ot-//JJ J zJ v - _'-.'3 7 F, i3/ m EARTH VIEW: A Business Guide to Orbital Remote Sensing NgI-Z4&71 (_!ASA-C_-ISB23_) EAsT VIEW: A 3USINESS GUI_E TO ORBITAL REMOTE SENSING (Houston Univ.) 13I p CSCL OBB Unclos G3/_3 001_137 Peter C. Bishop July 1990 Cooperative Agreement NCC 9-16 Research Activity No. IM.1 NASA Johnson Space Center Office of Commercial Programs Space Station Utilization Office "=.,. © Research Institute for Computing and Information Systems University of Houston - Clear Lake - T.E.C.H.N.I.C.A.L R.E.P.O.R.T Iml i I Jg. I k . U I i .... 7X7 iml The university of Houston-Clear Lake established the Research Institute for Computing and Information systems in 1986 to encourage NASA Johnson Space Center and local industry to actively support research in the computing and r' The information sciences. As part of this endeavor, UH-Clear Lake proposed a _._ partnership with JSC to jointly define and manage an integrated program of research in advanced data processing technology needed for JSC's main missions, including RICIS administrative, engineering and science responsibilities. JSC agreed and entered itffo : " a three-year cooperatlveagreement with UH-Clear _ke beginning in May, 1986, to ii jointly plan and execute such research through RICIS. Additionally, under Concept Cooperative Agreement NCC 9-16, computing and educational facilities are shared by the two institutions to conduct the research. The mission of RICIS is to conduct, coordinate and disseminate research on _-.. -- : computing and information systems among researchers, sponsors and users from UH-Clear Lake, NASA/JSC, and other research organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 the GLOBAL COMMERCIAL
    MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 THE GLOBAL COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY: JAPAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Saadia M. Pekkanen Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Middlebury College Middlebury, VT 05753 [email protected] I am grateful to Marco Caceres, Senior Analyst and Director of Space Studies, Teal Group Corporation; Mark Coleman, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency (CPIA), Johns Hopkins University; and Takashi Ishii, General Manager, Space Division, The Society of Japanese Aerospace Companies (SJAC), Tokyo, for providing basic information concerning launch vehicles. I also thank Richard Samuels and Robert Pekkanen for their encouragement and comments. Finally, I thank Kartik Raj for his excellent research assistance. Financial suppport for the Japan portion of this project was provided graciously through a Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Harvard Academy of International and Area Studies. MIT Japan Program Working Paper Series 01.10 Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E38-7th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617-252-1483 Fax: 617-258-7432 Date of Publication: July 16, 2001 © MIT Japan Program Introduction Japan has been seriously attempting to break into the commercial space launch vehicles industry since at least the mid 1970s. Yet very little is known about this story, and about the politics and perceptions that are continuing to drive Japanese efforts despite many outright failures in the indigenization of the industry. This story, therefore, is important not just because of the widespread economic and technological merits of the space launch vehicles sector which are considerable. It is also important because it speaks directly to the ongoing debates about the Japanese developmental state and, contrary to the new wisdom in light of Japan's recession, the continuation of its high technology policy as a whole.
    [Show full text]