THE VIOLATION of COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES in 22 MINUTES with BILLIE JOE ARMSTRONG INTERVIEW on CBS NEW YORK an Undergraduate Thesi
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE VIOLATION OF COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES IN 22 MINUTES WITH BILLIE JOE ARMSTRONG INTERVIEW ON CBS NEW YORK An Undergraduate Thesis Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Strata One RAISHA FATIMUZAHRA 11140260000050 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT ADAB AND HUMANITIES FACULTY STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 2019 ABSTRACT Raisha Fatimuzahra. The Violation of Cooperative Principles in 22 Minutes with Billie Joe Armstrong Interview on CBS New York. Thesis. Jakarta: English Language and Literature Department, Letter and Humanities Faculty, State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2019. This research aims to analyze the types of violations of the cooperative principles in the transcript of 22 Minutes with Billie Joe Armstrong Interview on CBS New York, using Paul Grice’ pragmatics theory. The purpose of this study is to explain the true meaning in the utterances and to understand the speech that are uttered by the participants. The writer uses qualitative analysis method in conducting the research. The result of the research shows the violations that are classified into four maxims by the participants in their utterances, which are 57% of maxim quantity, 10% of maxim quality, 20% of maxim relevance, and 13% of maxim manner. Keywords: Cooperative Principles, Transcript, The violation. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT In the name of Allah, The Most Gracious and The Most Merciful, The Lord of Universe, who has given the writer knowledge and strength in the process to finish this thesis. May blessing, peace, and salutation always be given to our prophet Muhammad SAW who has guided us from the darkness to the lightness. However, this success would not be achieved without the endless support and encouragements from the writer’s dearest family; her great Dad, Muhammad Ikhsan, her beloved Mom, Irna Komariyah, and her two sisters, Nida Fadhilah and Diyana Fajriyah, so that the writer was able to find power during the process in completing this thesis. Moreover, the writer also would like to express her deepest gratitude for several people for their great contribution and help for completing this thesis. They are: 1. Prof. Dr. Sukron Kamil, M.A., the Dean of Adab and Humanities Faculty. 2. Drs. Saefudin, M.Pd. as the Head of English Letters Departmen. 3. Mrs. Elve Oktafiyani, M.Hum. as the Secretary of English Letters Department. 4. Mrs. Sholikatus Sa’diyah, M.Pd., as the writer’s advisor who has educated, supported, directed and given the writer advices, suggestions, and recommendations for this thesis from beginning until the end. 5. All of the lecturers in English Letters Department, for their valuable knowledge during her study at State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. v 6. All of the librarian staffs of Adab and Humanities Faculty and UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. 7. The writer’s dearest friends Vivi Lay Rose, and Zulfa Nurafifah for being the writer’s great friend that always motivates her to finish her study. 8. All members of Gasss Terusss spesifically Abuniza Arramiz, Adnan Mizfari, Boby Mahesa, Farhan Tammam, Rakan Aji Wiratama, Tubagus Ahmad Nabiel, and Widada Rahman. 9. Annisa Nurul Jannah, Masayu Fitria, and Ratna Oetami Putri for always give helpful suggestion to the writer to finish her study. 10. My best friend since junior high school Irena Alvira, Kurnia Dwi Sulistyorini, Metty Marindah, and Suciati Cipta Sejati 11. Adnan Djaffar, Putri Cahya Arimbi, Rahmat Fernandes, Reza Zamzami, Sarah Syafitri, Syarah Annisa Hidayah, and Veriska Widya for always convincing the writer to finish this undergraduate thesis and being her greatest strength during the tough times. 12. Villarian Burhan. Thank you for always remind me not to complain about everything and thanks for giving strength in overcoming my shortcomings. 13. The writer’s classmates in both C and Linguistics Class. 14. Other beloved friends and relatives that cannot be mentioned one by one in this research. vi The writer acknowledges that this research is still far from perfect, thus, criticism and suggestions are always welcomed for the improvement of this thesis. Jakarta, January 10th 2019 Raisha Fatimuzahra vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. The Data ........................................................................................................ 18 Table 2. The Result of Violation a Maxim Cooperative Principles ............................ 41 viii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................i APPROVAL SHEET ..................................................................................................ii LEGALIZATION ......................................................................................................iii DECLARATION .......................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................viii TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................1 A. Background of the Study …............................................................................ 1 B. Focus of the Study …....................................................................................... 3 C. Research Question …...................................................................................... 3 D. Significance of the Study …............................................................................ 3 E. Research Methodology ................................................................................... 4 1. The Objectives of the Research ............................................................... 4 2. The Method of the Research …................................................................ 4 3. The Instrument of the Research …………………….............................. 4 4. The Unit of Analysis ................................................................................. 5 5. The Technique of Data Analysis .............................................................. 5 CHAPTER II THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ……………………………….. 6 A. Previous Research ………………………...……………………………...… 6 ix B. Transcript ..................................................................................................... 10 C. Pragmatics ..................................................................................................... 10 D. Cooperative Principles ................................................................................. 11 1. Maxim of Quantity ................................................................................. 12 2. Maxim of Quality .................................................................................... 12 3. Maxim of Relevance …………………………………………………... 13 4. Maxim of Manner ................................................................................... 13 E. Violating Maxim ........................................................................................... 14 1. Violating Maxim of Quantity ................................................................. 14 2. Violating Maxim of Quality ................................................................... 15 3. Violating Maxim of Relevance ………………………………………... 16 4. Violating Maxim of Manner .................................................................. 17 CHAPTER III RESEARCH FINDINGS ................................................................ 18 A. Data Description ........................................................................................... 18 B. Data Analysis ................................................................................................ 21 CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION …………...……………… 42 A. Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 42 B. Suggestion ..................................................................................................... 42 WORKS CITED ....................................................................................................... 44 APPENDICES .......................................................................................................... 46 x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study Communication is a process of sending and receiving message or information between two individuals or more effectively. It is a way to make others accept the ideas and drive others to do something by constructing the perception according to the desire. The speaker will try to make the speech always relevant with the context, clear and easy to understand, tight and brief, and always on the issue so it does not waste the time. The speaker usually considers carefully the various factors that are involved in a process of communication in order for the speech to be accepted by the interlocutor. Through communication, the message that will be conveyed can be understood. Therefore, communication will be effective only if the message can be interpreted equally each other. So, if irrelevancy happens, the concerned communicant does not cooperate and imply the misunderstanding or inaccuracy. The erroneous of speech is discussed in one of the