DOCSLIB.ORG

The New Politics of Higher Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New Politics of Higher Education THE POLITICS OF HIGHER EDUCATION: GOVERNMENTAL POLICY CHOICES AND PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION IN POST-COMMUNIST COUNTRIES A Comparative Study of Hungary, Georgia, Latvia and Lithuania By Marie Pachuashvili A dissertation submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of the Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Balázs Váradi Budapest 2009 I hereby declare that this work contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. This thesis contains no materials previously written and/or published by another person, unless otherwise noted. Marie Pachuashvili June 1, 2009 ii ABSTRACT Since the collapse of communist regime, higher education systems in countries of Central Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union have been witnessing a most profound transformation, related to diminished state involvement in funding, provision and governance of higher education. The creation and growth of private higher education institutions is one such development that greatly contributes to the changing higher education landscape. However, as we observe, the private higher education growth patterns have been largely uneven across the region, varying from non-existent to more than a 30 percent share of the total enrollments. Apart from the size, differences are perceptible in the nature and types of privately provided education. Notwithstanding the common legacy both at the higher education and broad political-economic levels, countries exhibit a wide variation with respect to the scope and nature of the private growth as well as governmental policies accommodating newly emerged institutional forms. The aim of the research project is two-fold. By using comparative case study method, the study seeks to document salient tendencies in governmental policies towards higher education and examine their impact on the size and nature of privately provided higher education. To understand what leads to such variety in governmental policy outcomes constitutes another central objective of this empirical undertaking. The four countries thought to be most suitable for examining the dual question of what determines the differences in governmental policy approach and how these differences, in turn, shape private higher education growth patterns are Hungary, Georgia, Latvia and Lithuania. iii The in-depth analysis of the four carefully selected cases has demonstrated that markedly different governmental approaches have produced equally diverse patterns of private sector growth. That is, a largely laissez-faire policy attitude characteristic of Georgia before the changes of 2003 has led to a sharp increase in small, pragmatically oriented institutions that are weak academically and mostly serve demand-absorbing function. Private sectors that are restricted in size and serve ethno-linguistic, religious or other culturally oriented goals characterize Hungary and Lithuania, where the governments have adopted the regulatory policy stance. The Latvian government’s largely market-liberal approach towards private institutions has produced a sector that is one of the largest in the region and that serves public purpose by providing students with enhanced choice. Examination of the factors at national level that ostensibly determine governmental policy approach towards privately provided education, on the other hand, has shown that the wealth of a country is one of the most potent variables explaining the divide between Georgia and the other three countries. The mode of interest intermediation and ethnic-religious heterogeneity of population also proved to be powerful predictors for governmental disposition towards private education, while the explanatory power of political ideology turned out to be weaker than hypothesized in some country cases. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project could not have been completed without support from several people to whom I owe special thanks. First and foremost, I would like to express my utmost gratitude to my supervisor, Balázs Váradi, who prompted my interest in higher education and whose enormous support and encouragements have helped me through the most difficult stages of working on this undertaking. I am especially grateful to Daniel Levy for the support and time he has given me. My work has benefited greatly from his valuable comments on different publications related to this project. Affiliate membership of Program for Research on Private Higher Education (PROPHE), which provided me with an opportunity to work and exchange ideas with colleagues with similar research interests, has been of special help. During my doctoral research, I benefited from the Doctoral Research Support Grant of CEU, which enabled me to travel to different countries to collect data and conduct interviews. I also would like to thank all my interviewees for agreeing to give their time and share their views. Finally, I wish to thank my husband Zaza for the tremendous support, and my son Nicolas, who has been my inspiration. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...................................................................................III ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................... V TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................... VI List of Figures ..................................................................................... x List of Tables ...................................................................................... xi List of Abbreviations........................................................................ xiv CHAPTER 1: SETTING THE STAGE............................................1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Main Objectives and Relevance of the Research Project ... 3 1.3 Plan of the Dissertation ................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ............................10 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................. 10 2.2 Determinants of Public Policy Choices ..................................... 10 2.3. Theories of Public Goods Provision......................................... 16 2.3.1. Market Failure.......................................................................................16 2.3.2. Government Failure .............................................................................19 2.4 Ideological Shift and Encouraging Market Mechanisms in Higher Education............................................................................... 23 2.5 Definition and Typology of Private Higher Education Institutions......................................................................................... 27 2.6 Governmental Policies towards Private Higher Education...... 37 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS...........43 3.1 Analytical Model .......................................................................... 43 vi 3.2 Measuring and Operationalizing Variables ............................... 45 3.2.1 Dependent Variable: Private Higher Education Growth Patterns ..45 3.2.2 Independent Variable: Governmental Policies towards Private Higher Education............................................................................................45 3.2.3 Determinants of Governmental Policy towards Private Higher Education........................................................................................................46 3.3 Working Hypothesis.................................................................... 48 3.4 Methodology and Case Selection .............................................. 52 CHAPTER 4: THE CASE OF HUNGARY....................................61 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................. 61 4.2. The Structure of the Higher Education System ....................... 62 4.2.1. Inter-Sectoral Dynamics ......................................................................62 4.2.2 Non-state Higher Education Institution Growth Patterns .................66 4.2.2.1 Ownership Status.................................................................................. 69 4.2.2.2 Institutional Funding .............................................................................. 69 4.2.2.3 Governance and Control ....................................................................... 73 4.2.2.4 Institutional Mission............................................................................... 75 4.2.3 Conclusion.............................................................................................78 4.3 Governmental Policies towards Higher Education................... 80 4.3.1 Legislative Framework .........................................................................80 4.3.2 Governance Structures for Higher Education Institutions ...............84 4.3.3 Higher Education Funding Policies.....................................................89 4.3.4 Conclusion.............................................................................................98 4.4 Determinants of Governmental Policies towards Higher Education........................................................................................... 99 4.4.1 Economic Development .......................................................................99 4.4.2 Political Parties and Ideology ............................................................105
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LATVIA in REVIEW July 26 – August 1, 2011 Issue 30
    LATVIA IN REVIEW July 26 – August 1, 2011 Issue 30 CONTENTS Government Latvia's Civic Union and New Era Parties Vote to Participate in Foundation of Unity Party About 1,700 people Have Expressed Wish to Join Latvia's Newly-Founded ZRP Party President Bērziņš to Draft Legislation Defining Criteria for Selection of Ministers Parties Represented in Current Parliament Promise Clarity about Candidates This Week Procedure Established for President’s Convening of Saeima Meetings Economics Bank of Latvia Economist: Retail Posts a Rapid Rise in June Latvian Unemployment Down to 12.3% Fourteen Latvian Banks Report Growth of Deposits in First Half of 2011 European Commission Approves Cohesion Fund Development Project for Rīga Airport Private Investments Could Help in Developing Rīga and Jūrmala as Tourist Destinations Foreign Affairs Latvian State Secretary Participates in Informal Meeting of Ministers for European Affairs Cabinet Approves Latvia’s Initial Negotiating Position Over EU 2014-2020 Multiannual Budget President Bērziņš Presents Letters of Accreditation to New Latvian Ambassador to Spain Society Ministry of Culture Announces Idea Competition for New Creative Quarter in Rīga Unique Exhibit of Sand Sculptures Continues on AB Dambis in Rīga Rīga’s 810 Anniversary to Be Celebrated in August with Events Throughout the Latvian Capital Labadaba 2011 Festival, in the Līgatne District, Showcases the Best of Latvian Music Latvian National Opera Features Special Summer Calendar of Performances in August Articles of Interest Economist: “Same Old Saeima?” Financial Times: “Crucial Times for Investors in Latvia” L’Express: “La Lettonie lutte difficilement contre la corruption” Economist: “Two Just Men: Two Sober Men Try to Calm Latvia’s Febrile Politics” Dezeen magazine: “House in Mārupe by Open AD” Government Latvia's Civic Union, New Era Parties Vote to Participate in Foundation of Unity Party At a party congress on July 30, Latvia's Civic Union party voted to participate in the foundation of the Unity party, Civic Union reported in a statement on its website.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Libraries 1 Akaki Tsereteli State University 2 Batumi
    № Number of libraries 1 Akaki Tsereteli State University 2 Batumi Navigation Teaching University 3 Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University 4 Batumi State Maritime Academy 5 Business and Technology University 6 Caucasus International University 7 Caucasus University 8 Collage Iberia 9 David Agmashenebeli University of Georgia 10 David Tvildiani Medical University 11 East European University 12 European University 13 Free Academy of Tbilisi 14 Georgian American University (GAU) 15 Georgian Aviation University 16 Georgian Patriarchate Saint Tbel Abuserisdze Teaching University 17 Georgian state teaching university of physical education and sport education and sport 18 Georgian Technical University 19 Gori State Teaching University 20 Guram Tavartkiladze Tbilisi Teaching University 21 Iakob Gogebashvili Telavi State University 22 Ilia State University 23 International Black Sea University 24 Korneli Kekelidze Georgian National Centre of Manuscripts 25 Kutaisi Ilia Tchavtchavadze Public Library 26 LEPL - Vocational College "Black Sea" 27 LEPL Vocational College Lakada 28 LTD East-West Teaching University 29 LTD Kutaisi University 30 LTD Schllo IB Mtiebi 31 LTD Tbilisi Free School 32 National Archives of Georgia 33 National University of Georgia (SEU) 34 New Higher Education Institute 35 New Vision University (NVU) 36 Patriarchate of Georgia Saint King Tamar University 37 Petre Shotadze Tbilisi Medical Academy 38 Public Collage MERMISI 39 Robert Shuman European School 40 Samtskhe-Javakheti State Teaching University 41 Shota Meskhia Zugdidi State Teaching University 42 Shota Rustaveli theatre and Film Georgia State University 43 St. Andrews Patriarchate Georgian University 44 Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani University 45 Tbilisi Humanitarian Teaching University 46 Tbilisi open teaching University 47 Tbilisi State Academy of Arts 48 Tbilisi State Medical University (TSMU) 49 TSU National Scientific Library.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvian Foreign and Security Policy
    Supported by: In cooperation with: The Latvian Foreign and Security Policy Yearbook 2018 aims to contribute to the understanding of Latvia’s foreign and security policy decisions and considerations in 2017, as well as assess the opportunities and concerns that await Latvia in 2018. During the past year Latvia saw considerable improvements in its security situation, while simultaneously met with new international and regional challenges. 2018 promises to be a similarly dynamic year full of opportunities and tests. Latvia will have to make brave and strong choices in its foreign and security policy. Supported by: the Parliament of the Republic of Latvia and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia In cooperation with: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Editors: Andris Sprūds, Ilvija Bruģe Authors: Māris Andžāns, Kristiāns Andžāns, Aldis Austers, Reinis Āboltiņš, Una Aleksandra Bērziņa-Čerenkova, Sintija Broka, Ilvija Bruģe, Kārlis Bukovskis, Alina Clay, Lolita Čigāne, Mārtiņš Daugulis, Justīne Elferte, Ilze Garoza, Ojārs Ēriks Kalniņš, Andis Kudors, Imants Lieģis, Žaneta Ozoliņa, Gunta Pastore, Diāna Potjomkina, Edgars Rinkēvičs, Uģis Romanovs, Ojārs Skudra, Andris Sprūds Project coordinators: Ilvija Bruģe, Sintija Broka The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Parliament of the Republic of Latvia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia or Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung or represent the opinion of any government authority or ministry. Translation from Latvian: Ingmārs Bisenieks English language editor: Līvija Uskale Layout: Oskars Stalidzāns Cover design: Kristīne Plūksna-Zvagule This book is published in collaboration with the Publishers Zinātne © Authors of the articles, 2018 © Translation: Ingmārs Bisenieks, 2018 ISBN 978-9934-567-18-6 © Layout: Oskars Stalidzāns, 2018 UDK 327(474.3)”20”(058) © Cover design: Kristīne Plūksna-Zvagule, 2018 Sp950 © Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD Andris Sprūds .
    [Show full text]
  • The Success and Failure of Ethnic Parties in New Democracies: Cross-National and Inter-Temporal Analysis on Post-Communist Europe
    G-COE GLOPE II Working Paper Series The Success and Failure of Ethnic Parties in New Democracies: Cross-National and Inter-temporal Analysis on Post-communist Europe. Ryo NAKAI Working Paper No.27 If you have any comment or question on the working paper series, please contact each author. When making a copy or reproduction of the content, please contact us in advance to request permission. The source should explicitly be credited. GLOPE Ⅱ Web Site: http://globalcoe-glope2.jp/ The Success and Failure of Ethnic Parties in New Democracies: 1 Cross-National and Inter-temporal Analysis on Post-communist Europe Ryo NAKAI Research Associate & Ph.D. Candidate Student, School of Political Science and Economics 2 [email protected] Abstract Why do ethnic minority parties succeed or fail? In order to solve this puzzle, this article explores cross-national and inter-temporal differences in post-communist new democracies using statistical analysis and small-N case studies, and argues that policy factors and the rationality of ethnic minorities determine the success and failure of ethnic parties and account for the variance in their standings. As some studies have pointed out, ethnic minorities’ voting behaviour should be rational and strategic. This article represents a basic spatial model and argues that ethnic minorities react to other parties’ policy changes and to the capability of other parties to win seats. Statistical analysis verifies this hypothesis. In addition, I discuss the Baltic States–Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania--as case studies. Although these three countries share a similar history, experience with minority issues and a common institutional design, their party systems indicate significant differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Latvia: Status Quo for Minorities Remains?
    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 9, No 1, 2010, 72-89 Original received: 08.12.2010 Copyright © ECMI 2010 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/2010/Latvia_Elections.pdf Elections in Latvia: status quo for minorities remains? Tatyana Bogushevitch and Aleksejs Dimitrovs * This article comments on the results of the recent parliamentary elections in Latvia and related implications for ethnic minorities. The authors examine in detail the pre-election programs, follow the developments before and after the elections, and come to the conclusion that the existing situation in the field of ethnic policy will remain in place for some time. Parliamentary elections took place in Latvia on 2 October 2010. Due to economic crisis and harsh austerity measures including severe public spending cuts, ethnic policy issues have not been very high on the agenda in the pre-election and post- election period, unlike in previous years. Nevertheless, in the country where more than 40% of the population are persons belonging to minorities 1, minority issues are inevitably a part of the national debate. After the elections, five alliances are represented in the Saeima (Parliament): centre-right ‘Unity’ (33 seats out of 100), social democratic ‘Concord Centre’ (29 seats), centre-right Union of Greens and Farmers (22 seats), right-wing nationalistic ‘All for Latvia’ – ‘For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK’ (8 seats) and centrist ‘For a Good Latvia’ (8 seats). Out of the 100 members 15 (13 ethnic Russians, 1 Karelian * Dr Tatyana Bogushevitch is a graduate of the University of Latvia, Riga.
    [Show full text]
  • Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse
    Auers, Daunis, and Andres Kasekamp. "Comparing Radical-Right Populism in Estonia and Latvia." Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. Ed. Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik and Brigitte Mral. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. 235–248. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 1 Oct. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472544940.ch-016>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 1 October 2021, 14:25 UTC. Copyright © Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik and Brigitte Mral and the contributors 2013. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 16 Comparing Radical-Right Populism in Estonia and Latvia Daunis Auers and Andres Kasekamp Introduction 2011 saw sharply contrasting parliamentary elections in neighbouring Estonia and Latvia. The 6 March 2011 poll in Estonia was the first election in post-communist Europe to feature an unchanged line-up of competing political parties, indicating a high level of political stability despite the financial and political turmoil that marked much of Europe in 2011 (Pettai et al. 2011). In contrast, the same year Latvia experienced its first early election, triggered by a referendum, on the recall of Parliament, called by the Latvian president in protest to a perceived ‘privatization of democracy in Latvia’ (Zatlers 2011). Moreover, the radical-right populist Visu Latvijai!/Tēvzemei un Brīvībai/LNNK (National Alliance of All for Latvia!/For Fatherland and Freedom/ Latvian National Independence Movement) almost doubled its share of the votes it won in the October 2010 regular election, and then subsequently took up government office in a new three-party coalition.
    [Show full text]
  • Between National and Academic Agendas Ethnic Policies and ‘National Disciplines’ at the University of Latvia, 1919–1940
    BETWEEN NATIONAL AND ACADEMIC AGENDAS Ethnic Policies and ‘National Disciplines’ at the University of Latvia, 1919–1940 PER BOLIN Other titles in the same series Södertörn Studies in History Git Claesson Pipping & Tom Olsson, Dyrkan och spektakel: Selma Lagerlöfs framträdanden i offentligheten i Sverige 1909 och Finland 1912, 2010. Heiko Droste (ed.), Connecting the Baltic Area: The Swedish Postal System in the Seventeenth Century, 2011. Susanna Sjödin Lindenskoug, Manlighetens bortre gräns: tidelagsrättegångar i Livland åren 1685–1709, 2011. Anna Rosengren, Åldrandet och språket: En språkhistorisk analys av hög ålder och åldrande i Sverige cirka 1875–1975, 2011. Steffen Werther, SS-Vision und Grenzland-Realität: Vom Umgang dänischer und „volksdeutscher” Nationalsozialisten in Sønderjylland mit der „großgermanischen“ Ideologie der SS, 2012. Södertörn Academic Studies Leif Dahlberg och Hans Ruin (red.), Fenomenologi, teknik och medialitet, 2012. Samuel Edquist, I Ruriks fotspår: Om forntida svenska österledsfärder i modern historieskrivning, 2012. Jonna Bornemark (ed.), Phenomenology of Eros, 2012. Jonna Bornemark och Hans Ruin (eds), Ambiguity of the Sacred, 2012. Håkan Nilsson (ed.), Placing Art in the Public Realm, 2012. Lars Kleberg and Aleksei Semenenko (eds), Aksenov and the Environs/Aksenov i okrestnosti, 2012. BETWEEN NATIONAL AND ACADEMIC AGENDAS Ethnic Policies and ‘National Disciplines’ at the University of Latvia, 1919–1940 PER BOLIN Södertörns högskola Södertörns högskola SE-141 89 Huddinge www.sh.se/publications Cover Image, taken from Latvijas Universitāte Illūstrācijās, p. 10. Gulbis, Riga, 1929. Cover: Jonathan Robson Layout: Jonathan Robson and Per Lindblom Printed by E-print, Stockholm 2012 Södertörn Studies in History 13 ISSN 1653-2147 Södertörn Academic Studies 51 ISSN 1650-6162 ISBN 978-91-86069-52-0 Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Politics and Views on Brexit
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8362, 2 May 2019 The EU27: Internal Politics By Stefano Fella, Vaughne Miller, Nigel Walker and Views on Brexit Contents: 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Croatia 5. Cyprus 6. Czech Republic 7. Denmark 8. Estonia 9. Finland 10. France 11. Germany 12. Greece 13. Hungary 14. Ireland 15. Italy 16. Latvia 17. Lithuania 18. Luxembourg 19. Malta 20. Netherlands 21. Poland 22. Portugal 23. Romania 24. Slovakia 25. Slovenia 26. Spain 27. Sweden www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The EU27: Internal Politics and Views on Brexit Contents Summary 6 1. Austria 13 1.1 Key Facts 13 1.2 Background 14 1.3 Current Government and Recent Political Developments 15 1.4 Views on Brexit 17 2. Belgium 25 2.1 Key Facts 25 2.2 Background 25 2.3 Current Government and recent political developments 26 2.4 Views on Brexit 28 3. Bulgaria 32 3.1 Key Facts 32 3.2 Background 32 3.3 Current Government and recent political developments 33 3.4 Views on Brexit 35 4. Croatia 37 4.1 Key Facts 37 4.2 Background 37 4.3 Current Government and recent political developments 38 4.4 Views on Brexit 39 5. Cyprus 42 5.1 Key Facts 42 5.2 Background 42 5.3 Current Government and recent political developments 43 5.4 Views on Brexit 45 6. Czech Republic 49 6.1 Key Facts 49 6.2 Background 49 6.3 Current Government and recent political developments 50 6.4 Views on Brexit 53 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful New Parties in the Baltic States: Similar Or Different?
    Successful new parties in the Baltic states: similar or different? Paper prepared for the conference ‘The Baltic States: New Europe or Old?’ University of Glasgow, 22-23 January 2004 Allan Sikk Department of Political Science University of Tartu Ülikooli 18, Tartu 50090 Estonia [email protected] http://www.ut.ee/SOPL/cv/sikke.htm Tel +372 7 375 668 Fax +372 7 375 154 DRAFT VERSION – PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE WITHOUT PERMISSION Introduction Last elections in the Baltic states witnessed a rise of strong and significant new parties. In October 2000 parliamentary elections in Lithuania, the New Union – Social Liberals (Naujoji Sąjunga – Socialliberalai) led by Artūras Paulauskas, was supported by 19.6% of the electorate in the proportional representation part thereby coming second after the Algirdas Brazauskas’ Social-Democratic Coalition. It gained 28 seats, being the third largest group in the Seimas as the Liberal Union was more successful in the single mandate constituencies. Nevertheless, the New Union was an equal partner in the governing coalition, Paulauskas becoming the chairman of the parliament. Furthermore, it has been in the Lithuanian cabinet ever since, while the Liberal Union was forced to leave after only eight months in office and was replaced by the Social Democrats. Two years later, in October 2002 Saeima elections, the New Era (Jaunais Laiks) surfaced becoming the most popular party in Latvia. It won 24% of the votes and 26 seats in the 100-strong parliament. Despite being in a difficult position concerning finding appropriate coalition partners, the New Era leader Einars Repse succeeded in putting together a government rather swiftly (in less than three weeks, Ikstens 2002) and becoming the prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Students to Be Active Citizens and Involved in The
    ERASMUS+ Key Action 2 Capacity Building Program for Higher Institutions of Education 2016 Selected Project: Curriculum Reform for Promoting Civic Education and Democratic Principles in Israel and in Georgia CURE Project number: 573322-EPP-1-2016-IL-EPPKA2-CBHE Engaging Students to be active citizens in their community: CURE’s Centers for Social and Civic Involvement by: Rhonda Sofer, Coordinator of CURE Tomer Ben Hamou, Coordinator of Student Activities in Israel Tamar Moshiashvili, Coordinator of Student Activities in Georgia Contributors: Alan Bainbridge, Canterbury Christ Church University Evanne Ratner, Gordon Academic College of Education Disclaimer: "This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein" able of contents T Acknowledgements 3 Introduction 5 By Rhonda Sofer Chapter 1: An Overview of the Impact of the Centers of 8 Social and Civic Involvement and its student activities By Alan Bainbridge Chapter 2: Community Placemaking 14 By Tomer Ben Hamou Chapter 3: World Cafe 22 By Tomer Ben Hamou Chapter 4: Dialogue through Discussions, Debates, the Media 25 and Field Trips By Evanne Ratner Chapter 5: CURE’s Student Activities in Georgia: School-based 27 Community Action By Tamar Moshiashvili Conclusion: Some Reflections on CURE’s Centers of Social and Civic Involvements and Student Activities in Israel and in 43 Georgia By Dr. Rhonda Sofer, Coordinator of CURE Recommended Literature 46 Appendix 1: About the CURE project 50 2 Acknowledgements I have been the coordinator of the ERASMUS+ program Curriculum Reform for Promoting Democracy and Civic Education in Israel and Georgia -acronym CURE, officially from October 15, 2016 (website- https://cure.erasmus-plus.org.il/ ).
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Population in Latvia
    The Russian Population in Latvia - The Russian Population in Latvia - Puppets of Moscow? Puppets of Moscow? Latvian integration policy concerns a complex of issues such as citizenship, school language Tomas Malmlöf:TheRussianPopulationinLatvia and minority status. The policy has let Latvia become an accepted member of the international community, but it is challenged by domestic Russian-speaking groups and by the Russian TOMAS MALMLÖF Federation. The disagreements originate in the interpretation of Latvian 20th century history and the definition of a national minority, based on the actual Latvian situation. A crucial question is whether Russia exercises any influence on the Latvia-Russian community, giving it an improper impact on Latvian interior affairs. Official Russian compatriot policy seems to have had little success in this, but it has still been able to keep the ethnic question in the Baltic states alive at the international level. Radical Russian free-lancers in ethnic policymaking might be a bigger nuisance for Latvia, but without official Russian support, they are in all likelihood easier to come to terms with. As a group, the Latvia-Russians seem to have reached a critical level of internal organisation with several political parties, NGOs and competing mass media. They have therefore turned into a self-sufficient actor capable of setting its own agenda instead of implementing the agenda of others. Thus the Latvia-Russians are hardly remote-controlled from Moscow, which, of course, does not prevent them from cooperating with different Russian actors when their interests coincide. Tomas Malmlöf is Master of Political Science and Economy and an expert on Russian business questions.
    [Show full text]