DOCSLIB.ORG

Wikiproject Covid-19 and Wikipedia's Non- Medical Coverage of the Covid-19 Pandemic Jason Moore (User:Another Believer)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wikiproject Covid-19 and Wikipedia's Non- Medical Coverage of the Covid-19 Pandemic Jason Moore (User:Another Believer) WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 AND WIKIPEDIA'S NON- MEDICAL COVERAGE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC JASON MOORE (USER:ANOTHER BELIEVER) SYMPOSIUM ON WIKIPEDIA AND COVID-19 MAY 9, 2020 INTRODUCTION USER:ANOTHER BELIEVER • Daily editor for 12.5 years • 350,000+ contributions to English Wikipedia • 100,000+ contributions to Wikimedia Commons + other Wikimedia projects • Movement projects: Art+Feminism, Cascadia Wikimedians, Wikimedia LGBT+ • WikiProjects: Oregon, Public Art, Sculpture, LGBT studies / Wiki Loves Pride • Help organize meetups/workshops: Central Library, Oregon Jewish Museum, Pacific Northwest College of Art, Portland Art Museum, Portland State University, etc. WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 IN THE BEGINNING… • January: Started following initial Wikipedia articles about outbreak (China) • February: Started following Wikipedia articles about Iran, Italy, and South Korea • WHO recognized the outbreak as a pandemic on 3/11; WikiProject created 3/15 WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 WIKIPROJECT: “A GROUP OF CONTRIBUTORS WHO WANT TO WORK TOGETHER AS A TEAM TO IMPROVE WIKIPEDIA” • Goal: Create temporary or permanent space for editors to work together • Opportunity for Wikipedia to inform readers and have (even more) real life impact • Posted invitations on article talk pages related to COVID; members joined quickly • Received some pushback for creating new project w/ narrow focus; mostly thanks WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 RAPID GROWTH • Created by yours truly on March 15, 2020 (English Wikipedia) • Immediately joined by 30 participants • 50+ members within 24 hours • 100+ members by April 1 • 150 members by April 20 • 164 members, as of today (May 9) WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 STRUCTURE • No stated goals, but in general, works to create and improve coverage of content related to the virus, disease, and ongoing pandemic at English Wikipedia • Task forces focused on case counts, equipment, and translating • Collaborations: Women in Red, WM Joint Support (WMUK + Wiki Project Med) • 1,000+ articles; 2,250+ content/category/redirect/project pages; 4,400+ w/ talk pages Members built a framework, hung a barnstar, tagged related pages, assessed content, combatted misinformation, and started talk page discussions very quickly. WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 STRUCTURE + COLLABORATION • Automatically generated reports: • article alerts, current events, traffic, bots, deaths • Resources for improving content related to COVID • Active talk page: share updates, ask questions, invite to assist w/ specific tasks • Editors assess and discuss options, form a consensus, and divide and conquer! WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 OTHER WIKIMEDIA PROJECTS • 14 similar projects in other languages • Wikidata: WikiProject COVID-19 • WikiProject India/COVID-19 task force • SWASTHA (Sanskrit word for “health”) project works with experts to reduce misinformation in Indian languages • Wikimedia Commons: WikiProject COVID-19 Graphics WIKIPROJECT COVID-19 INTERESTED? HELP US MAKE THE INTERNET BETTER! • Thanks to WikiProject members (and non-members) for such great work! • Visit WikiProject COVID-19 @ WP:COVID, or find banner on article talk pages NON-MEDICAL COVERAGE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC TEMPLATE:COVID-19 PANDEMIC NON-MEDICAL COVERAGE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC LOCATIONS Typical framework for location-based articles: • Timeline of cases • Government response • Economic and social impacts • entertainment, industries, politics, public transit, school closures, sports, etc. NON-MEDICAL COVERAGE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IMPACTS Courtesy of yours truly: cannabis industry, LGBT community, public transport, social media, Wikipedia’s response NON-MEDICAL COVERAGE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED? • Wide range of topics related to COVID-19 • Speak to the pandemic’s unprecedented impact across a variety of disciplines • There are many ways to contribute to Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects • Be bold! And, of course, stay safe. ATTRIBUTION ATTRIBUTION FOR CONTENT IN SCREENSHOTS AVAILABLE IN HISTORIES OF THE FOLLOWING WIKIMEDIA PAGES: • Slide 3: • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pageviews_Analysis_2019–20_coronavirus_pandemic_24_March_2020.png • Slides 5–6: • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_COVID-19 • Slide 6: • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_COVID-19 • Slide 7: • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WP_1.0_bot/Tables/Project/COVID-19 • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikiproject_viewership_march_2020.png • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_COVID-19/Participants • Slide 8: • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_COVID-19/Hot_articles • Slide 9: • https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q87748614 • Slide 10: • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COVID-19_barnstar.png Jason Moore • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:COVID-19_Barnstar.png • Slide 11–13: User:Another Believer • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:COVID-19_pandemic .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance
    Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance Andrea Forte1, Vanessa Larco2 and Amy Bruckman1 1GVU Center, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology {aforte, asb}@cc.gatech.edu 2Microsoft [email protected] This is a preprint version of the journal article: Forte, Andrea, Vanessa Larco and Amy Bruckman. (2009) Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems. 26(1) pp 49-72. Publisher: M.E. Sharp www.mesharpe.com/journals.asp Abstract How does “self-governance” happen in Wikipedia? Through in-depth interviews with twenty individuals who have held a variety of responsibilities in the English-language Wikipedia, we obtained rich descriptions of how various forces produce and regulate social structures on the site. Our analysis describes Wikipedia as an organization with highly refined policies, norms, and a technological architecture that supports organizational ideals of consensus building and discussion. We describe how governance on the site is becoming increasingly decentralized as the community grows and how this is predicted by theories of commons-based governance developed in offline contexts. We also briefly examine local governance structures called WikiProjects through the example of WikiProject Military History, one of the oldest and most prolific projects on the site. 1. The Mechanisms of Self-Organization Should a picture of a big, hairy tarantula appear in an encyclopedia article about arachnophobia? Does it illustrate the point, or just frighten potential readers? Reasonable people might disagree on this question. In a freely editable site like Wikipedia, anyone can add the photo, and someone else can remove it. And someone can add it back, and the process continues.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Wikimedia Communities of India
    State of Wikimedia Communities of India Assamese http://as.wikipedia.org State of Assamese Wikipedia RISE OF ASSAMESE WIKIPEDIA Number of edits and internal links EDITS PER MONTH INTERNAL LINKS GROWTH OF ASSAMESE WIKIPEDIA Number of good Date Articles January 2010 263 December 2012 301 (around 3 articles per month) November 2011 742 (around 40 articles per month) Future Plans Awareness Sessions and Wiki Academy Workshops in Universities of Assam. Conduct Assamese Editing Workshops to groom writers to write in Assamese. Future Plans Awareness Sessions and Wiki Academy Workshops in Universities of Assam. Conduct Assamese Editing Workshops to groom writers to write in Assamese. THANK YOU Bengali বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/ By Bengali Wikipedia community Bengali Language • 6th most spoken language • 230 million speakers Bengali Language • National language of Bangladesh • Official language of India • Official language in Sierra Leone Bengali Wikipedia • Started in 2004 • 22,000 articles • 2,500 page views per month • 150 active editors Bengali Wikipedia • Monthly meet ups • W10 anniversary • Women’s Wikipedia workshop Wikimedia Bangladesh local chapter approved in 2011 by Wikimedia Foundation English State of WikiProject India on ENGLISH WIKIPEDIA ● One of the largest Indian Wikipedias. ● WikiProject started on 11 July 2006 by GaneshK, an NRI. ● Number of article:89,874 articles. (Excludes those that are not tagged with the WikiProject banner) ● Editors – 465 (active) ● Featured content : FAs - 55, FLs - 20, A class – 2, GAs – 163. BASIC STATISTICS ● B class – 1188 ● C class – 801 ● Start – 10,931 ● Stub – 43,666 ● Unassessed for quality – 20,875 ● Unknown importance – 61,061 ● Cleanup tags – 43,080 articles & 71,415 tags BASIC STATISTICS ● Diversity of opinion ● Lack of reliable sources ● Indic sources „lost in translation“ ● Editor skills need to be upgraded ● Lack of leadership ● Lack of coordinated activities ● ….
    [Show full text]
  • The Culture of Wikipedia
    Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Identification, Goal Setting and Social Modeling in Directing Online
    Organizing without Formal Organization: Group Identification, Goal Setting and Social Modeling in Directing Online Production Haiyi Zhu, Robert Kraut, Aniket Kittur Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA15213 {haiyiz, robert.kraut, nkittur}@cs.cmu.edu ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A challenge for many online production communities is to Online production communities are becoming increasingly direct their members to accomplish tasks that are important important in creating innovative products in the networked to the group, even when these tasks may not match world. These organizations have successfully aggregated individual members’ interests. Here we investigate how the efforts of millions of volunteers to produce complex combining group identification and direction setting can artifacts such as GNU/Linux and Wikipedia. Currently most motivate volunteers in online communities to accomplish large online projects primarily rely on a paradigm of self- tasks important to the success of the group as a whole. We direction in which contributors work primarily on the tasks hypothesize that group identity, the perception of belonging they are interested in. This paradigm provides a number of to a group, triggers in-group favoritism; and direction benefits. Contributors are motivated to work on the tasks in setting (including explicit direction from group goals and which they are intrinsically interested in and are likely to implicit direction from role models) focuses people’s choose tasks in which they already have some expertise [4]. group-oriented motivation towards the group’s important However, this approach breaks down when there are tasks. We tested our hypotheses in the context of conflicts between the interests of the contributors and the Wikipedia's Collaborations of the Week (COTW), a group interests of the project as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • COI Editing and Its Discontents
    Wikipedia @ 20 Paid With Interest: COI Editing and its Discontents William Beutler Published on: Jun 10, 2019 Updated on: Jun 19, 2019 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Wikipedia @ 20 Paid With Interest: COI Editing and its Discontents Image credit: Jim Pennucci. 1. Everyone involved with Wikipedia has some kind of interest in what it says. In the classic formulation, its volunteer editors are inspired to empower a global audience by compiling information in an accessible format. Practically speaking, though, most participate because the project appeals to their personality, their sense of justice, or there's an ego boost in deciding what the world knows about their pet subject. Its readers care simply because they want to learn something. For the most part, this works very well. Things are rather different when the motivation is financial. Most contributors consider editing Wikipedia to promote a business a morally different endeavor, and its readers, too, may be alarmed to learn some edits are made not to benevolently share knowledge with the world, but because the writer has a material stake in how the topic is represented. And yet the structure of Wikipedia makes this tension inevitable. The site's vast influence owes something to the fact that anyone can influence it, so when those described in its virtual pages decide to do exactly that, the result is one of Wikipedia's most challenging existential dilemmas. Wikipedia's favored terminology for this is "conflict of interest", referred to in shorthand as "COI"— although other terms such as "paid editing" or "paid advocacy" are often encountered.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiki-Hacking: Opening up the Academy with Wikipedia
    St. John's University St. John's Scholar Faculty Publications Department of English 2010 Wiki-hacking: Opening Up the Academy with Wikipedia Adrianne Wadewitz Occidental College Anne Ellen Geller St. John's University, [email protected] Jon Beasley-Murray University of British Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.stjohns.edu/english_facpubs Part of the Education Commons, and the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Wadewitz, A., Geller, A. E., & Beasley-Murray, J. (2010). Wiki-hacking: Opening Up the Academy with Wikipedia. Hacking the Academy Retrieved from https://scholar.stjohns.edu/english_facpubs/4 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at St. John's Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of St. John's Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wiki-hacking: Opening up the academy with Wikipedia Contents Wiki-hacking: Opening up the academy with Wikipedia Introduction Wikipedia in academia Constructing knowledge Writing within discourse communities What's missing from Wikipedia Postscript: Authorship and attribution in this article Links Notes Bibliography Wiki-hacking: Opening up the academy with Wikipedia By Adrianne Wadewitz, Anne Ellen Geller, Jon Beasley-Murray Introduction A week ago, on Friday, May 21, 2010, we three were part of a roundtable dedicated to Wikipedia and pedagogy as part of the 2010 Writing Across the Curriculum (http://www.indiana.edu/~wac2010/abstracts.shtml) conference. That was our first face-to-face encounter; none of us had ever met in real life.
    [Show full text]
  • Embracing Wikipedia As a Teaching and Learning Tool Benefits Health Professional Schools and the Populations They Serve
    2017 Embracing Wikipedia as a teaching and learning tool benefits health professional schools and the populations they serve Author schools’ local service missions, suggesting that embracing Wikipedia as a teaching and learning Amin Azzam1* tool for tomorrow’s health professionals may be globally generalizable. A network of health Abstract professional schools and students contributing to Wikipedia would accelerate fulfillment of Wikipedia’s To paraphrase Wikipedia cofounder Jimmy Wales, audacious aspirational goal—providing every single “Imagine a world where all people have access person on the planet free access to the sum of all to high quality health information clearly written human knowledge. in their own language.” Most health professional students likely endorse that goal, as do individuals Keywords who volunteer to contribute to Wikipedia’s health- related content. Bringing these two communities medical education; medical communication; together inspired our efforts: a course for medical Wikipedia students to earn academic credit for improving Wikipedia. Here I describe the evolution of that Introduction course between 2013 – 2017, during which 80 students completed the course. Collectively they “Imagine a world in which every single person on the edited 65 pages, adding over 93,100 words and planet is given free access to the sum of all human 608 references. Impressively, these 65 Wikipedia knowledge. That’s what we’re doing.”1 pages were viewed 1,825,057 times during only the students’ active editing days. The students’ Some might consider this audacious statement a efforts were in partnership with communities naïve dreamer’s fantasy. Yet even at 16 years old, outside of academia—namely Wikiproject Medicine, Wikipedia continues to rank amongst the top 10 most 2 Translators Without Borders, and Wikipedia Zero.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Contribute Climate Change Information to Wikipedia : a Guide
    HOW TO CONTRIBUTE CLIMATE CHANGE INFORMATION TO WIKIPEDIA Emma Baker, Lisa McNamara, Beth Mackay, Katharine Vincent; ; © 2021, CDKN This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly credited. Cette œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), qui permet l’utilisation, la distribution et la reproduction sans restriction, pourvu que le mérite de la création originale soit adéquatement reconnu. IDRC Grant/ Subvention du CRDI: 108754-001-CDKN knowledge accelerator for climate compatible development How to contribute climate change information to Wikipedia A guide for researchers, practitioners and communicators Contents About this guide .................................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Why Wikipedia is an important tool to communicate climate change information .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Enhancing the quality of online climate change information ............................................. 8 1.2 Sharing your work more widely ......................................................................................................8 1.3 Why researchers should
    [Show full text]
  • Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia
    Innovation Report Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School Amin Azzam, MD, MA, David Bresler, MD, MA, Armando Leon, MD, Lauren Maggio, PhD, Evans Whitaker, MD, MLIS, James Heilman, MD, Jake Orlowitz, Valerie Swisher, Lane Rasberry, Kingsley Otoide, Fred Trotter, Will Ross, and Jack D. McCue, MD Abstract Problem course on student participants, and improved their articles, enjoyed giving Most medical students use Wikipedia readership of students’ chosen articles. back “specifically to Wikipedia,” and as an information source, yet medical broadened their sense of physician schools do not train students to improve Outcomes responsibilities in the socially networked Wikipedia or use it critically. Forty-three enrolled students made information era. During only the “active 1,528 edits (average 36/student), editing months,” Wikipedia traffic Approach contributing 493,994 content bytes statistics indicate that the 43 articles Between November 2013 and November (average 11,488/student). They added were collectively viewed 1,116,065 2015, the authors offered fourth-year higher-quality and removed lower- times. Subsequent to students’ efforts, medical students a credit-bearing course quality sources for a net addition of these articles have been viewed nearly to edit Wikipedia. The course was 274 references (average 6/student). As 22 million times. designed, delivered, and evaluated by of July 2016, none of the contributions faculty, medical librarians, and personnel of the first 28 students (2013, 2014) Next Steps from WikiProject Medicine, Wikipedia have been reversed or vandalized. If other schools replicate and improve Education Foundation, and Translators Students discovered a tension between on this initiative, future multi-institution Without Borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikimania Presentation.Pptx
    WIKIPROJECT X or, how we learned to stop worrying and love Lua modules An exposition on the work of WikiProject X, January to July 2015, and plans for the future By James Hare and Kim Schoonover Wikimania 2015 • Mexico City July 19, 2015 Wait, what is this? A WikiProject is an on-wiki working group focusing on a task or a subject area Term used on English Wikipedia, Wikidata, Commons For example The problem Many have started but fallen apart Difficult to navigate Outdated technology Unrealized potential The solution Research Design Experimentation Let’s begin! Step 1: Research Step 1: Research WikiProject Stories: Users shared experiences running or interacting with WikiProjects We encoded statements for “benefits” and “obstacles” Step 1: Research Benefits: Active discussion and participation (13) Guiding editor activity (10) Documentation (5) Welcoming to newcomers (5) Recent changes list (3) Active recruitment (3) Dispute resolution (2) Organized workflow (2) Serves previously identified community (2) Community identity (1) Categorizing work (1) Coordination with other language editions (1) Help desk (1) Dedicated organizer base (1) Deletion sorting (1) Coordinating editor work (1) Step 1: Research Obstacles: Low project participation (12) High organizing burden (5) High onboarding burden and rule creep (5) Community conflict (4) High technical burden (3) High maintenance burden (3) Project scope issues (1) Request for additional participation (1) Step 1: Research Design Research Reviewing existing WikiProjects Compiling list of WikiProject
    [Show full text]
  • LIGHTNING TALKS “How We Can Support Indigenous Communities That Want a Wikipedia in Their Native Languages”
    LIGHTNING TALKS “How we can support indigenous communities that want a Wikipedia in their native languages” Name: Eddie Avila, Global Voices Username: Barrioflores Challenge: Building and sustaining Wikipedias in indigenous languages is challenging, but there are steps that the Wikimedia movement can take to help native speakers share knowledge in their native languages. “Women and Wikmedia Projects in Spain. Gender gap through the the free knowledge movement.” Name: Virginia Diez Username: Gini10 Challenge: Though we are engaging an increasing number of women to contribute in the Wikimedia Projects, it's difficult to get them to feel empowered in order to take responsibility or actively participate in decision-making processes. “Recruiting women as editors which will lead to writing articles about women.” Name: Hana Yariv Username: Hanay Challenge: Using the personal approach in addressing the female gap. Alison Jackson’s work Alison Jackson’s work Pictures from the spokesperson unit of the President “A concern that some women had when I interviewed them regarding the Wikipedia gender gap.” Name: Sabine Ronsen Username: sabinitus Challenge: How can we prevent wikipedia from falling victim to the same conservatism and exclusive thinking that has characterized traditional encyclopedias? “Recruiting underrepresented groups and experiences gained at Wikipedia Camps.” Name: Sofie Jansson Username: Sofie Sigrinn Challenge: In our quest for getting more people identifying as women into Wikipedia/Wikimedia can separatism be the solution, a tool or a dead end? “WikiWomen Prize as a model of gender gap” Name: Walaa AbdelManaem ﻻ روﺳﺎ :Username Challenge: This prize promotes the quality, quantity and credibility of contents on the web in regards to female related content within the scope of Wikimedia Foundation projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia's Gaps in Coverage : Are Wikiprojects a Solution? a Study Of
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Wikipedia’s gaps in coverage : are Wikiprojects a solution? a study of the Cambodian Wikiproject Luyt, Brendan 2018 Luyt, B. (2018). Wikipedia’s gaps in coverage : are Wikiprojects a solution? a study of the Cambodian Wikiproject. Online Information Review, 42(2), 238‑249. doi:10.1108/OIR‑06‑2017‑0199 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105868 https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR‑06‑2017‑0199 © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Online Information Review and is made available with permission of Emerald Publishing Limited. Downloaded on 26 Sep 2021 18:05:56 SGT Wikipedia’s gaps in coverage: are Wikiprojects a solution? A study of the Cambodian Wikiproject Abstract Purpose: This article examines the rather unsuccessful Wikiproject for Cambodia. Despite its lack of success it is a case that can be used to draw lessens for dealing with the issue of geographical under- representation on Wikipedia as a whole. After presenting evidence of the Wikiproject’s failure to achieve the goals for which it was created, I will discuss the pressing issues of imbalances in geographical coverage on Wikipedia as well as the deeper issues involved in remedying these imbalances; namely, the question of who gets to represent whom. Design/methodology/approach: I take a broadly qualitative approach to the study of Wikipedia. For this study the Cambodia Wikiproject main page, as well as the various talk page archives associated with it, was downloaded in November 2016 and subjected to a content analysis.
    [Show full text]