Laminated Root Rot Susan K

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laminated Root Rot Susan K 2009 Forest Health Protection and State Forestry Organizations 11.4 WEB July 2010 Management Guide for Laminated Root Rot Susan K. Hagle USDA Forest Service Phellinus sulphurascens (Pilat) [formerly Phellinus weirii (Murr.) Gilb. Douglas-fir form] Topics Introduction 1 Nomenclature 2 Ecology 2 Hosts: Primarily Two distinct biological species of this fungus Impact 6 Douglas-fir occur in western North America; and grand fir one primarily on Douglas-fir and true firs Mortality rates 7 (discussed here), All conifers may be and the other, on western redcedar (see Site factors 8 infected Chapter 13.5; Cedar Laminated Butt Rot). Assessing severity 9 Management 10 considerations A serious disease in northern Idaho and western Montana. Regeneration 11 systems This fungus kills trees in expected to have better survival on expanding patches in forests. These infested sites. Thinning 12 patches can be from a few trees to Laminated root rot is estimated Prescribed fire 14 many acres in size. Trees of all ages to infest at least 739,000 acres in Fertilization 14 are killed as their roots are Idaho and Montana. Mortality destroyed by the fungus. Many also centers occupy over 15,000 acres of Biological control 14 die through wind-throw following federal, state and private forestland Stump removal 15 decay of support roots. The fungus on and near the Idaho Panhandle, Chemical control 15 spreads underground through tree Clearwater, Lolo, Kootenai and root systems and survives for many northwestern Bitterroot National Other reading 16 decades in dead roots and stumps. Forests in Idaho and Montana. It is Field Guide Laminated root rot should be rarely seen south of the Salmon Management Guide considered a “disease of the site”. River in Idaho. Douglas-fir and Index That is, established mycelia of this grand fir forests on warm, moist site fungus are essentially permanent, so types are most damaged. the best course is to minimize losses Key Points by managing tree species that can be Manage for pines, larch, and cedar. Precommercial thinning may OVERVIEW OF improve growth and LAMINATED ROOT ROT MANAGEMENT survival of pines and larch 1. Favor resistant species. Especially pines and western larch. Thinning for bark 2. Thin early and avoid partial harvests. Precommercially thin beetle control may favoring root disease resistant species. result in increased 3. Avoid commercial thinning that will leave susceptible mortality if crop trees. Mortality rates of susceptible leave-trees are likely laminated root rot to remain high, or increase following thinning. is present. Page 2 Back to menu Laminated Root Rot 11.4 Nomenclature of Phellinus sulphurascens The name Phellinus Banik and others (1993) found sulphurascens was officially Douglas-fir isolates to be distinct Laminated root assigned to the Douglas-fir/ true fir from the cedar form in ELISA rot in Western form of Phellinus weirii by Larsen (seriological) tests. They also North America and others in 1994. But at least as demonstrated that the Douglas-fir by far back as 1954 the two distinct form is serologically related to Thies and forms of Phellinus weirii, one Siberian isolates of P. Sturrock, 1995 found primarily on Douglas-fir and sulphurascens. It is more closely the other in western redcedar, were related to the Asian P. This useful recognized (Buckland 1954). The sulphurascens than to cedar form publication provides name change will reduce the isolates of P. weirii. They excellent confusion that has resulted from concluded that the Douglas-fir form photographs and using the same name for two is probably conspecific with P. summarizes the dissimilar fungus species, with sulphurascens. Based on results relevant information different hosts, and vastly different from monocaryon matings, Larsen for the identification and management disease management methods. and others (1994) also concluded of this disease. Larsen and Lombard initially that the correct name for the proposed separation of the cedar Douglas-fir form is Phellinus form from the Douglas-fir form sulphurascens Pilat. They also into two distinct species in 1989. described the hyphal system of They found significant differences both Douglas-fir and cedar forms in cultural characteristics, length of as being monomitic. A monomitic setal hyphae, basidiospore hyphal system is the principle germinating characteristics and criterion that separates the genus host specificity. Cedar and Douglas Inonotus from Phellinus. Therefore Phellinus -fir forms are distinctly intersterile the correct generic placement of sulphurascens groups in culture (Angwin and both P. weirii and P. sulphurascens Hansen 1988). Despite finding is Inonotus. Pathogen of nearly complete genetic isolation of Beginning in 2007 Sturrock and conifers in the Douglas-fir and cedar forms associates adopted the use of northern Angwin (1989) recommended Phellinus sulphurascens to refer to hemisphere. considering them to be intersterility the Douglas-fir form (Sturrock and Annual groups rather than distinct species. others 2007, Lim and others 2008). sporophore Intersterility observed in cultures This is the binomial I will use in was confirmed by Bae and others the present document. Douglas-fir and (1994) in naturally-occurring grand fir are the populations. most important hosts. Ecology of laminated root rot in forest ecosystems Does not mate with Phellinus Life Cycle summer or fall. The simple, single weirii. Phellinus sulphurascens begins -celled spores are produced en life, like most fungi, as a spore. masse within pores of the Monomitic The mostly annual, crust-like sporophore. They are wind or hyphal system sporophores typically form on the water-dispersed; rarely landing on suggests genus name Inonotus. moist underside of downed logs. a substrate that is suitable for their The sporophore matures in late survival. 11.4 Back to menu Laminated Root Rot Page 3 Moisture is required for Oregon was estimated by Dickman germination. The mycelium that is and Cook (1989) to be at least 460 subsequently produced must years old. Laminated root establish on suitable wood and Saprophytic and parasitic rot is commonly repel competitors or perish. Most existence found in the perish. Phellinus sulphurascens has same trees and been reported to live even the same Persistent and expanding saprophytically in the roots and roots with other mycelial clones lower stem of fallen trees or in root diseases New myclia from germinating individual cut stumps for as long such as spores probably join with, and as 50 years (Hansen 1976, 1979a). Armillaria, exchange nuclei (conjugate) with Hyphae penetrate the wood, other mycelia to become Annosus, and causing a ‘white rot” type of decay Tomentosus root heterokaryotic. These mycelia may in which both cellulose and lignin diseases. have ecological advantages over are degraded. Dead wood utilized those grown from a single spore by P. sulphurascens also may be Angwin and Hansen (1993). Even from tree and woody-shrub species so, life is precarious for the new that were resistant when they are heterokaryote and few will live to alive. establish as a clone. The mycelium spreads from There is little genetic variation woody substrates to the roots of within established clones, live trees through direct root indicating that they start from contact with infected wood. Mycelium— single basidiospores and do not Infection intensity may increase Plural: Mycelia mate with or combine genetic The vegetative (non- with each generation (Tkacz and fruiting) part of a fungus material with new spores or Hansen 1982). In northern Rocky consisting of a mass of colonies (Bae and others 1994). Mountain forests, Douglas-fir and branching, thread-like Vegetative incompatability among grand fir are particularly hyphae. clones effectively prevents susceptible to infection. Once Monomitic— initiation of new infections in established on a root of a live tree, a fungus that has only areas occupied by established the fungus invades and kills the one kind of hyphae, clones (Bae and others 1994). This cambium of the root and the generative hyphae. means that established clones decays the dead root tissues. The effectively block invasion by new Heterokaryotic— mycelium may eventually travel cells having two distinct clones of P. sulphurascens. It up the root to colonize the root nuclei. Generally appears that once a clone is collar, and girdle the tree. produced by conjugation established on a site, it may of two different mycelia. survive for centuries by utilizing Aggregated and dispersed Homokaryotic— both living hosts and dead infections in stands cells having one substrates. Generation after Laminated root rot occurs in nucleus. Homokaryotic mycelia generally result generation of trees serve as hosts complex patterns in forest stands, for the same clone on a site. from germination of with many or most of the infected sexually produced Because clones within trees bearing no above-ground spores, such as those infection centers are genetically symptoms of infection. Distinct from sporophores. distinct from one another, the infection centers are easily approximate extent and age of detected as aggregations of dead clones associated with some and diseased trees. Much of the infection centers have been infection in a stand will be within determined. For example, a clone and adjacent to these infection in a mountain hemlock forest in centers. Page 4 Back to menu Laminated Root Rot 11.4 Infected trees also are found The most significant effect of dispersed throughout stands in fire may be the opportunity it locations having no apparent provides for less-susceptible tree relationship to infection centers species to establish. Pines and larch (Thies and Nelson 1997, Thies and are sometimes able to survive fires Sturrock 1995). Thies and Nelson that kill Douglas-fir and grand fir, (1997) reported that infection rates and to take advantage of fire- at considerable distance from produced openings to regenerate. infection centers were as high as Historically, fires probably played they were at the edges of infection an important role in reducing EXPANSION RATES centers, near confirmed inoculum laminated root rot by favoring sources.
Recommended publications
  • Common Name Image Library Partners for Australian Biosecurity
    1. PaDIL Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Phellinus sulphurascens Pilát Basidiomycetes Common Name Laminated root rot Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/136619 Image Library Australian Biosecurity Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/ Partners for Australian Biosecurity image library Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment https://www.awe.gov.au/ Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia https://dpird.wa.gov.au/ Plant Health Australia https://www.planthealthaustralia.com.au/ Museums Victoria https://museumsvictoria.com.au/ 2. Species Information 2.1. Details Specimen Contact: Dr Jose R. Liberato - [email protected] Author: Liberato JR Citation: Liberato JR (2006) Laminated root rot(Phellinus sulphurascens )Updated on 7/23/2016 Available online: PaDIL - http://www.padil.gov.au Image Use: Free for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY- NC 4.0) 2.2. URL Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/136619 2.3. Facets Status: Exotic Regulated Pest - absent from Australia Group: Fungi Commodity Overview: Forestry Commodity Type: Timber Distribution: USA and Canada, South and South-East Asia 2.4. Other Names Inonotus heinrichii (Pilát) Bondartsev & Singer Inonotus sulphurascens (Pilát) M. Larsen, Lombard & Clark Phellinidium sulphurascens (Pilát) Y.C. Dai Phellinus weirii (Murrill) Gilb. pro parte Xanthochrous glomeratus subsp. heinrichii Pilát Xanthochrous heinrichii f. nodulosus Pilát 2.5. Diagnostic Notes Symptoms The fungus penetrates the root of Douglas-fir through intact bark and initiates decay in the xylem. Symptoms are not unlike those caused by other root pathogens.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative and Population Genomics Landscape of Phellinus Noxius
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/132712; this version posted September 17, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Comparative and population genomics landscape of Phellinus noxius: 2 a hypervariable fungus causing root rot in trees 3 4 Chia-Lin Chung¶1,2, Tracy J. Lee3,4,5, Mitsuteru Akiba6, Hsin-Han Lee1, Tzu-Hao 5 Kuo3, Dang Liu3,7, Huei-Mien Ke3, Toshiro Yokoi6, Marylette B Roa3,8, Meiyeh J Lu3, 6 Ya-Yun Chang1, Pao-Jen Ann9, Jyh-Nong Tsai9, Chien-Yu Chen10, Shean-Shong 7 Tzean1, Yuko Ota6,11, Tsutomu Hattori6, Norio Sahashi6, Ruey-Fen Liou1,2, Taisei 8 Kikuchi12 and Isheng J Tsai¶3,4,5,7 9 10 1Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taiwan 11 2Master Program for Plant Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan 12 3Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 13 4Biodiversity Program, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica and 14 National Taiwan Normal University 15 5Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University 16 6Department of Forest Microbiology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 17 Tsukuba, Japan 18 7Genome and Systems Biology Degree Program, National Taiwan University and Academia 19 Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 20 8Philippine Genome Center, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines 21 1101
    [Show full text]
  • The Cardioprotective Properties of Agaricomycetes Mushrooms Growing in the Territory of Armenia (Review) Susanna Badalyan, Anush Barkhudaryan, Sylvie Rapior
    The Cardioprotective Properties of Agaricomycetes Mushrooms Growing in the Territory of Armenia (Review) Susanna Badalyan, Anush Barkhudaryan, Sylvie Rapior To cite this version: Susanna Badalyan, Anush Barkhudaryan, Sylvie Rapior. The Cardioprotective Properties of Agari- comycetes Mushrooms Growing in the Territory of Armenia (Review). International Journal of Medic- inal Mushrooms, Begell House, 2021, 23 (5), pp.21-31. 10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.2021038280. hal-03202984 HAL Id: hal-03202984 https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-03202984 Submitted on 20 Apr 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Cardioprotective Properties of Agaricomycetes Mushrooms Growing in the territory of Armenia (Review) Susanna M. Badalyan 1, Anush Barkhudaryan 2, Sylvie Rapior 3 1Laboratory of Fungal Biology and Biotechnology, Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Biomedicine, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia; 2Department of Cardiology, Clinic of General and Invasive Cardiology, University Hospital № 1, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia;
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDINGS of the 25Th ANNUAL WESTERN INTERNATIONAL FOREST DISEASE WORK CONFERENCE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25th ANNUAL WESTERN INTERNATIONAL FOREST DISEASE WORK CONFERENCE Victoria, British Columbia September 1977 Proceedings of the 25th Annual Western International Forest Disease Work Conference Victoria, British Columbia September 1977 Compiled by: This scan has not been edited or customized. The quality of the reproduction is based on the condition of the original source. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Western International Forest Disease Work Conference Victoria, British Columbia September 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Forward Opening Remarks, Chairman Don Graham 2 Memorial Statement - Stuart R. Andrews 3 Welcoming Address: Forest Management in British Columbia with Particular Reference to the Province's Forest disease Problems Bill Young 5 Keynote Address: Forest Diseases as a Part of the Forest Ecosystem Paul Brett PANEL: REGULATORY FUNCTIONS OF DISEASES IN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS 10 Introduction to Regulatory Functions of Diseases in Forest Ecosystems J. R. Parmeter 11 Relationships of Tree Diseases and Stand Density Ed F. Wicker 13 Forest Diseases as Determinants of Stand Composition and Forest Succession Earl E. Nelson 18 Regulation of Site Selection James W. Byler 21 Disease and Generation Time J. R. Parmeter PANEL: INTENSIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT AS INFLUENCED BY FOREST DISEASES 22 Dwarf Mistletoe and Western Hemlock Management K. W. Russell 30 Phellinus weirii and Intensive Management Workshops as an aid in Reaching the Practicing Forester G. W. Wallis 33 Fornes annosus in Second-Growth Stands Duncan Morrison 36 Armillaria mellea and East Side Pine Management Gregory M. Filip 39 Thinning Second Growth Stands Paul E. Aho PANEL: KNOWLEDGE UTILIZATION IN WESTERN FOREST PATHOLOGY 44 Knowledge Utilization in Western Forest Pathology R Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Meeting Agenda Monday, September 18, 2017, 7:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers, 898 Elk Drive, Brookings, OR 97415 1
    Workshop Meeting Agenda Monday, September 18, 2017, 7:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers, 898 Elk Drive, Brookings, OR 97415 1. Call To Order 2. Roll Call 3. Topics a. Azalea Park Tree Removal Documents: AZALEA PARK TREE REMOVAL CWR.PDF AZALEA PARK TREE REMOVAL.ATT.A.ARBORIST REPORT.PDF AZALEA PARK TREE REMOVAL.ATT.B.COST ESTIMATE.PDF AZALEA PARK TREE REMOVAL.ATT.C.ARTICLE.PDF AZALEA PARK TREE REMOVAL.ATT.D.PRESS RELEASE.PDF b. Submitted Materials Documents: 1.2014 FIELD GUIDE FOR HAZARD TREE ID_STELPRD3799993.PDF 2.LONG RANGE PLANNING FOR DEVELOPED SITES.PDF 3.TRIGLIA INPUT EMAIL.PDF 4.TRIGLIA INPUT EMAIL ATTACHMENT.PDF 5.ASHDOWN QUESTIONS FOR FRENCH.PDF 4. Adjournment All public meetings are held in accessible locations. Auxiliary aids will be provided upon request with at least 72 hours advance notification. Please contact 469-1102 if you have any questions regarding this notice. for the greatest good Field Guide for Hazard-Tree Identification and Mitigation on Developed Sites in Oregon and Washington Forests 2014 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religión, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/ or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency’s EEO Counselor (click the hyperlink for list of EEO counselors) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide for Danger Tree Identification and Response
    United States Department of Agriculture Field Guide for Forest Service Pacific Northwest Danger Tree Region Identification and United States Response Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Oregon Associated Oregon OSHA Loggers, Inc. Inside Front Cover Field Guide for Danger Tree Identification and Response Richard Toupin Regional Logging Engineer, Gregory Filip Regional Forest Pathologist, Thomas Erkert Transportation Group Leader Pacific Northwest Region USDA Forest Service • Michael Barger Logging Specialist Salem District USDI Bureau of Land Management • 2008 Acknowledgements We thank the following people who contributed to revising this guide: Diane Hildebrand, Donald Goheen, Craig Schmitt, Kristen Chadwick, Angel Saavedra, and Katrina Mallams. Graphic Design: Michael Hamel (FS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contract USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call 800-795-3272 (voice) or 202-720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. R6-NR-FP-PR-01-08 1 2 Table of Contents Introduction ...............................................................5 Regulatory Basis ........................................................6 Responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Phellinus Sulphurascens and the Closely Related P
    Mycologia, 86(1), 1994, pp. 121-130. Phellinus sulphurascens and the closely related P. weirii in North America Michael J. Larsen1 cedar as “perennial P. weirii. ” Clark (1958) deter- Francis F. Lombard mined that “cedar isolates” and “noncedar isolates” Joseph W. Clark may be separated on the basis of cultural character- U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Forest Service, Forest istics. However, Nobles (1948, 1965) did not distinguish Products Laboratory,2 One Gifford Pinchot Drive, the two forms in axenic culture. Angwin (1989) and Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2398 Angwin and Hansen (1989, in press) developed a back- pairing method to determine compatibility in mono- karyon-monokaryon and monokaryon-heterokaryon Abstract: Monokaryotic isolates of Phellinus sulphur- (di-mon) pairings and demonstrated a high degree of ascens, a fungus originally described from the Primorsk genetic isolation (incompatibility) between the western Territory, Russia, are compatible with monokaryotic redcedar and Douglas-fir forms. Protein banding pat- isolates of, what has been called in North America, terns obtained by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis the Douglas-fir form of P. weirii. Phellinus weirii, orig- (SDS-PAGE) further demonstrated the genetic differ- inally described from Idaho as a root and stem decay ences between the two groups. However, because ex- fungus of western redcedar, is not compatible with amples of partial compatibility were observed in some monokaryotic isolates of P. sulphurascens or the Doug- monokaryon-monokaryon pairings, Angwin and Han- las-fir form of P. weirii. Differences between P. sul- sen (1989, in press) concluded that the groups are best phurascens and P. weirii are noted. Observations on referred to as “intersterility groups.” Banik et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Laminated Root Rot in a Western Washington Plantation: 8-Year Mortality and Growth of Douglas-Fir As Related to Infected Stumps, Tree Density, and Fertilization
    United States Department of Laminated Root Rot in a Western Agriculture Washington Plantation: 8-Year Forest Service Mortality and Growth of Douglas- Pacific Northwest Research Station Fir as Related to Infected Stumps, Research Paper PNW-RP-569 Tree Density, and Fertilization November 2006 Richard E. Miller, Timothy B. Harrington, Walter G. Thies, and Jeff Madsen The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795- 3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Diversity of the Genus Phellinus Quél. S.S. (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetaceae) in Koderma Wildlife Sanctuary, Jharkhand, India
    ISSN (Online): 2349 -1183; ISSN (Print): 2349 -9265 TROPICAL PLANT RESEARCH 6(3): 472–485, 2019 The Journal of the Society for Tropical Plant Research DOI: 10.22271/tpr.2019.v6.i3.058 Research article Taxonomy and diversity of the Genus Phellinus Quél. s.s. (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetaceae) in Koderma wildlife sanctuary, Jharkhand, India Arvind Parihar1*, Y. V. Rao2, S.B. Padal2, Kanad Das1 and M. E. Hembrom3 1 Cryptogamic Unit, Botanical Survey of India, P.O. Botanical Garden, Howrah, West Bengal, India 2 Department of Botany, Andhra University Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India 3 Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P.O. Botanical Garden, Howrah, West Bengal, India *Corresponding Author: [email protected] [Accepted: 11 December 2019] Abstract: The Genus Phellinus Quél. s. s. is a diverse genus in the Family Hymenochaetaceae, which is represented by 12 species in the Koderma Wildlife Sanctuary (KWS), Jharkhand. In the present communication important macro- and micro-morphological features of the species of Phellinus Quél. s.s. present in KWLS is given. An artificial key to the species present in KWLS is also provided. Keywords: Phellinus - Taxonomy - Macrofungi - Koderma - Jharkhand. [Cite as: Parihar A, Rao YV, Padal SB, Das K & Hembrom ME (2019) Taxonomy and diversity of the Genus Phellinus Quél. s.s. (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetaceae) in Koderma wildlife sanctuary, Jharkhand, India. Tropical Plant Research 6(3): 472–485] INTRODUCTION Traditionally genus Phellinus Quél. (a macrofungal genus causing serious wood rot) was considered as one of the largest genera of the family Hymenochaetaceae. This genus was described to encompass poroid Hymenochaetaceae (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) with perennial basidiomata and a dimitic hyphal system (Larsen & Cobb-Poulle 1990, Wagner & Fischer 2002) but these characteristic features gradually appeared to be artificial because many intermediate forms have also been reported by many workers (Fiasson & Niemelä 1984, Corner 1991, Dai 1995, 1999, 2010, Fischer 1995, Wagner & Fischer 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 55Th Annual Western International Forest Disease Work Conference
    Proceedings of the 55th Annual Western International Forest Disease Work Conference Radisson Poco Diablo Resort Sedona, Arizona October 15 to 19, 2007 Compiled by: Michael McWilliams Oregon Department of Forestry Insect and Disease Section Salem, Oregon Proceedings of the 55th Annual Western International Forest Disease Work Conference Radisson Poco Diablo Resort Sedona, Arizona October 15 to 19, 2007 Compiled by: Michael McWilliams Oregon Department of Forestry Insect and Disease Section Salem, Oregon & Patsy Palacios S.J. and Jessie E. Quinney Natural Resources Research Library College of Natural Resources Utah State University, Logan 2008, WIFDWC These proceedings are not available for citation of publication without consent of the authors. Papers are formatted with minor editing for formatting, language, and style, but otherwise are printed as they were submitted. The authors are responsible for content. SPECIAL THANKS! Photos were taken by John Schwandt, Michael McWilliams, Pete Angwin, Rona Sturrock and Walt Thies i TABLE OF CONTENTS Program 1 Achievement Awards 2006 Outstanding Achievement Award Dr. Bart Van der Kamp 3 2006 Outstanding Achievement Award Alan Kanaskie 8 2007 Outstanding Achievement Award Dr. Richard S. Hunt 9 Pre-Meeting Session- Forest Disease and Climate Change in Western Forests: What do we know; What Do We Need to Find Out? Abiotic Diseases and Climate Change John Kliejunas 11 Canker Diseases and Climate Change John Kliejanas 12 Climate and Forest Declines in Western North America Paul Hennon 13 Effects of Climate Change on Wood Decay: Heart Rot and Sap Rot J.A. Micales Glaeser 14 Climate and Foliar Diseases Jeffrey Stone 15 Phytophthoras/Climate/Climate Change Ellen Goheen 16 Root Disease and Climate Change Mee-Sook Kim 17 General Consideration, Dwarf Mistletoe and Stem Rusts B.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Aphyllophoraceous Fungi (Agaricomycetes) of the Brazilian Amazonia
    Posted date: June 2009 Summary published in MYCOTAXON 108: 319–322 Checklist of the aphyllophoraceous fungi (Agaricomycetes) of the Brazilian Amazonia ALLYNE CHRISTINA GOMES-SILVA1 & TATIANA BAPTISTA GIBERTONI1 [email protected] [email protected] Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Micologia Av. Nelson Chaves s/n, CEP 50760-420, Recife, PE, Brazil Abstract — A literature-based checklist of the aphyllophoraceous fungi reported from the Brazilian Amazonia was compiled. Two hundred and sixteen species, 90 genera, 22 families, and 9 orders (Agaricales, Auriculariales, Cantharellales, Corticiales, Gloeophyllales, Hymenochaetales, Polyporales, Russulales and Trechisporales) have been reported from the area. Key words — macrofungi, neotropics Introduction The aphyllophoraceous fungi are currently spread througout many orders of Agaricomycetes (Hibbett et al. 2007) and comprise species that function as major decomposers of plant organic matter (Alexopoulos et al. 1996). The Amazonian Forest (00°44'–06°24'S / 58°05'–68°01'W) covers an area of 7 × 106 km2 in nine South American countries. Around 63% of the forest is located in nine Brazilian States (Acre, Amazonas, Amapá, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima, Tocantins, west of Maranhão, and north of Mato Grosso) (Fig. 1). The Amazonian forest consists of a mosaic of different habitats, such as open ombrophilous, stational semi-decidual, mountain, “terra firme,” “várzea” and “igapó” forests, and “campinaranas” (Amazonian savannahs). Six months of dry season and six month of rainy season can be observed (Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 2007). Even with the high biodiversity of Amazonia and the well-documented importance of aphyllophoraceous fungi to all arboreous ecosystems, few studies have been undertaken in the Brazilian Amazonia on this group of fungi (Bononi 1981, 1992, Capelari & Maziero 1988, Gomes-Silva et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Danville-Georgetown Open Space Forest Stewardship Plan
    Danville-Georgetown Open Space Forest Stewardship Plan March 2014 _______________________________________ Kevin Brown, Director Parks and Recreation Division Report produced by: King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Parks and Recreation Division Water and Land Resources Division 201 South Jackson Street, Suites 700/600 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 (206) 477-4527 Suggested citation for this report: King County. 2014. Danville-Georgetown Open Space. Forest Stewardship Plan. King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Parks and Recreation Division, Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, Washington. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………4 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………… 5 General Property Information ..........................................................................................................5 History and Acquistion ................................................................................................................ 6 Surrounding land Use …………………………………………………………………………..7 Access …………………………………………………………………………………………..7 Easements .................................................................................................................................... 8 Natural Resource Analysis ...............................................................................................................8 Natural Resource
    [Show full text]