DOCSLIB.ORG

AMOFSG/9-SN No. 11 9/6/11

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AMOFSG/9-SN No. 11 9/6/11 AMOFSG/9-SN No. 11 9/6/11 AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG) NINTH MEETING Montréal, 26 to 30 September 2011 Agenda Item 5: Observing and forecasting at the aerodrome and in the terminal area 5.1: Observations REPORT OF THE AD-HOC WORKING GROUP ON THE FUTURE REPORTING OF PRESENT WEATHER IN FULLY AUTOMATED MET REPORTS (Presented by Colin Hord, Rapporteur of AMOFSG/8 ad-hoc WG/3) SUMMARY This paper presents the conclusions of the ad-hoc team tasked with reviewing the options for the future reporting of present weather in fully automated weather reports. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 At the eighth meeting of the Aerodrome Meteorological Observation and Forecast Study Group (AMOFSG/8), Action 8/13 led to the formation of an ad-hoc team with the objective to consider the following tasks: a) the representation of missing present weather and other information in weather reports when automatically generated b) review the ability to adequately report TS and SH in automated weather reports (a current Standard). c) review the ability and future need to report certain present weather phenomena in automated reports, which are currently RPs. d) the potential requirement for all CAT II & CAT III airports to be equipped with an automated present weather sensor AMOFSG.9.SN.011.5.en.doc AMOFSG/9-SN No. 11 - 2 - 1.2 The following members have provided valuable information leading to the summarized results in this paper. Colin (Rapporteur) assisted by Darren Hardy, Bill, Herbert, Jan (assisted by Kees Blom, Nico Maat), Jarmo Keith, Ophelia, Steve, Peter & Shona (assisted by Don Anderson). The summarized responses are attached at the appendix to this paper. From the appendix to this paper, an ‘Executive Summary’ is provided that details the discussions and conclusions. 1.3 The responses received lead the Rapporteur to conclude that a single paper should be generated for AMOFSG/9 containing the following 3 sections: 1. Missing information in AUTO METARs 2. Review of capabilities of PW sensors 3. Present Weather Sensor at CAT II and III aerodromes 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Missing information in AUTO METARs 2.1.1 The ad-hoc team were tasked with considering how best to represent the present weather group in automated reports when a sensor existed but was unserviceable. In addressing this, it became evident that currently most States alert users to the non availability of automated weather reports due to sensor failure through the provision of NOTAMs. It is understood that some States utilise solidii within the automated report itself to denote sensor unserviceability. However, during AMOFSG8 it was noted that the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations (IFALPA) felt that the use of solidii provide little meaningful information to users. It is concluded that suitable brief guidance on the use of NOTAMs to alert users to sensor unserviceability should be generated in Doc 9837 (Manual on Automated Meteorological Observing Systems at Aerodromes). 2.1.2 For the reasons provided by IFALPA it is considered necessary to generate specific terminology to represent the non availability of information for present weather. There are various combinations that could be used for this purpose, though the consensus view was that the code ‘WXNA’ (Weather data not available due to sensor failure) should be proposed to be adopted in such circumstances. 2.1.3 In consideration of similar issues for each other element of automated reports resulting from the failure of sensors it was considered that a similar format could be proposed to provide additional information on the unserviceability of any other sensor. That being the case, it is proposed that the following format should be proposed to be adopted: ‘xxNA’, where xx refers to any of the following parameters ‘WIND’, ‘VIS’, ‘CLD’, TEMP’ & ‘QNH’, and NA means ‘Not Available due to sensor unserviceability’. With the agreement of group, this would lead to the following additional codes in automated METARs: WINDNA Wind not available due to sensor unserviceability VISNA Visibility not available due to sensor unserviceability CLDNA Cloud not available due to sensor unserviceability TEMPNA Temperature not available due to sensor unserviceability - 3 - AMOFSG/9-SN No. 11 QNHNA Pressure not available due to sensor unserviceability 2.1.4 In recognition of the format differences in automated local and special reports, the following format is offered as a proposal for local & special reports: ‘xx NA’, where xx refers to any of the following parameters ‘WIND’, ‘VIS’, ‘CLD’, T’, ‘DP’ & ‘QNH’, and NA means ‘Not Available due to sensor unserviceability’. (The spacing between xx and NA reflecting consistency with the format defined in Table A3-1 of Annex 3). 2.1.5 It was noted by KNMI in particular the potential additional benefit of discriminating between parts of particular groups in local reports, for example ‘Wind direction’ and ‘wind speed’. With the agreement of group, this would lead to the following additional codes for local reports: WIND NA Wind not available due to sensor unserviceability WINDDIR NA Wind direction not available due to sensor unserviceability WINDSPD NA Wind speed not available due to sensor unserviceability VIS NA Visibility not available due to sensor unserviceability CLD NA Cloud not available due to sensor unserviceability CLDAMT NA Cloud amount not available due to sensor unserviceability CLDHGT NA Cloud height not available due to sensor unserviceability CLDTYP NA Cloud type not available due to sensor unserviceability TEMP NA Temperature not available due to sensor unserviceability DEWP NA Dew point not available due to sensor unserviceability QNH NA Pressure not available due to sensor unserviceability 2.1.6 It was noted that the United States has for a number of years been providing similar information in the RMKs section of METARs. In terms of the need to notify users of sensor unavailability in automated reports, the necessity to keep such information within the body of the METAR (and local report) should be considered in order that the information might be disseminated internationally and ingested within software systems. Action 1: In respect of this, it is proposed that the subgroup ask the Secretary to prepare an Annex 3 amendment for the use of appropriate coding to denote the non-availability of AUTO METAR groups due to sensor failure (paras 2.1.3 & 2.1.5 refers). 2.1.7 The United States also noted that there were a number of issues associated with implementing such a proposal and wished to see further discussions especially with users before implementation. 2.2 Review of capabilities of PW sensors 2.2.1 The existing requirement for the reporting of present weather is defined by Annex 3, para 4.6.4.1. and elaborated on at App 3, para 4.4.2. 2.2.2 These Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) however make no distinction between fully automated reports and reports with human intervention. So in theory at least the full extent of weather parameters should be equally available in automated reports as well as from human intervened reports. AMOFSG/9-SN No. 11 - 4 - 2.2.3 The consensus of the group considered that only the following weather groups can be reported in fully automated reports to a similar accuracy to that achievable by human intervention: HZ Haze BR Mist FG Fog RA Rain DZ Drizzle SN Snow RADZ Rain & drizzle RASN Rain & snow UP Unidentified precipitation FZRA Freezing rain FZDZ Freezing drizzle FZUP Freezing unidentified precipitation FZFG Freezing fog 2.2.4 There was strong support for the requirement to report TS and GR/GS in automated weather reports. It was clear that these may be achieved in a number of ways, including remote sensing and single site sensors, but also to a large extent reliant on human detection. However, the results obtained are often variable, especially with hail. It is suggested that States are encouraged by the Secretary to provide information papers (IPs) on methods to detect TS and hail within their States for AMOFSG/9 and focus on technical solutions to derive suitably reliable results. As such, the following additional weather parameters should remain Standards for automated weather reports: TS Thunderstorm TSRA Thunderstorm with rain TSSN Thunderstorm with snow TSGR Thunderstorm of hail TSGS Thunderstorm with small hail/snow pellets TSUP Thunderstorm with unidentified precipitation VCTS Thunderstorm in vicinity The following should remain RPs: SHGR Showers of hail (intermittent hail) SHGS Showers of small hail/snow pellets (intermittent small hail/snow pellet) 2.2.5 Studies carried out by States have concluded that the algorithm used to generate reports of showers in automated reports (which are based on temporal variations in precipitation), provide poor correlation against the traditional definition of showers (indicated by the presence of convective cloud). This suggests that reports of SH in automated reports may provide unreliable or misleading information to users. 2.2.6 Whilst it is perfectly possible to continue to have a requirement to report SH in automated reports, it is suggested that Industry consider the on going requirement to receive information - 5 - AMOFSG/9-SN No. 11 relating to what is more accurately defined as ‘intermittent precipitation’. This will inform the requirement or not to add the following weather parameters as requirements in automated weather reports. SHRA Showers of rain (intermittent rain) SHSN Showers of snow (intermittent snow) SHUP Showers of unidentified precipitation (intermittent unidentified precipitation) Note. — It is assumed that automated systems can adequately differentiate between slight (-), moderate and heavy (+) precipitation) With respect to this, it is questionable whether the prefix SH is required in association with GR and GS in automated reports. Arguably, given the more precise meaning of SH in automated reports, there is a case for permitting GR & GS without that SH prefix.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AMOFSG/10-Sod 19/6/13
    AMOFSG/10-SoD 19/6/13 AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG) TENTH MEETING Montréal, 17 to 19 June 2013 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS 1. HISTORICAL 1.1 The tenth meeting of the Aerodrome Meteorological Observation and Forecast Study Group (AMOFSG) was held at the Headquarters of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Montréal, Canada, 17 to 19 June 2013. 1.2 The meeting was opened by Mr. Greg Brock, Chief of the Meteorology Section of the Air Navigation Bureau of ICAO, who extended a warm welcome to all the participants. Mr. Brock emphasized that this tenth meeting of the AMOFSG was likely to be the last of the group prior to the convening of an ICAO Meteorology (MET) Divisional Meeting in July 2014, to be held in part conjointly with the Fifteenth Session of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Commission for Aeronautical Meteorology (CAeM-XV). For this reason, Mr. Brock underlined the need for the group to work efficiently during its three days of deliberations, with a strong emphasis placed on determining whether proposals arising from each of the topics to be addressed were of sufficient maturity so as to reduce or eliminate entirely the need for significant further work and/or a meeting ahead of the MET Divisional Meeting. 1.3 The names and contact details of the participants are listed in Appendix A . Mr. Bill Maynard was elected Chairman of the meeting. The meeting was served by the Acting Secretary of the AMOFSG, Mr. Greg Brock, Chief, Meteorology Section. 1.4 The meeting considered the following agenda items: Agenda Item 1: Opening of the meeting; Agenda Item 2: Election of Chairman; Agenda Item 3: Adoption of working arrangements; Agenda Item 4: Adoption of the agenda; (41 pages) AMOFSG.10.SoD.en.docx AMOFSG/10-SoD - 2 - Agenda Item 5: Aerodrome observations; Agenda Item 6: Forecasting at the aerodrome and in the terminal area and ATIS requirements; Agenda Item 7: Deliverables; Agenda Item 8: Any other business; and Agenda Item 9: Closure of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Evaluation of Misting Fans in Hot and Humid Climate
    Building and Environment 45 (2010) 2666e2678 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Building and Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv Performance evaluation of misting fans in hot and humid climate N.H. Wong*, Adrian Z.M. Chong Department of Building, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 117566 Republic of Singapore article info abstract Article history: Singapore experiences a hot and humid climate throughout the year. This in turn results in heavy reli- Received 3 March 2010 ance on mechanical systems especially air-conditioning to achieve thermal comfort. An alternative would Received in revised form be the use of evaporative cooling which is less energy intensive. Objective and subjective measurements 14 May 2010 were conducted at an experimental setup at the National University of Singapore (NUS) to evaluate the Accepted 27 May 2010 thermal conditions and thermal sensations brought about by misting fans. Field measurements were also conducted at food centres in Singapore to determine if they are coherent with the objective and Keywords: subjective measurements conducted. Analysis of objective and subjective data showed that the misting Misting fan fi Evaporative cooling fan was able to signi cantly reduce the dry-bulb temperature and thermal sensation votes. This is fi Singapore consistent with eld measurements taken, where regression analysis showed that with the misting fan, Hot thermal neutrality can be obtained at a higher outdoor effective temperature (ET*). However, the Humid reduction in temperature comes at the expense of higher relative humidity which results in consistently greater biological (bacterial and fungal) pollutants being enumerated from samples collected under the misting fan system.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodrome Actual Weather – METAR Decode
    Aerodrome Actual Weather – METAR decode Code element Example Decode Notes 1 Identification METAR — Meteorological Airfield Report, SPECI — selected special (not from UK civil METAR or SPECI METAR METAR aerodromes) Location indicator EGLL London Heathrow Station four-letter indicator 'ten twenty Zulu on the Date/Time 291020Z 29th' AUTO Metars will only be disseminated when an aerodrome is closed or at H24 aerodromes, A fully automated where the accredited met. observer is on duty break overnight. Users are reminded that reports AUTO report with no human of visibility, present weather and cloud from automated systems should be treated with caution intervention due to the limitations of the sensors themselves and the spatial area sampled by the sensors. 2 Wind 'three one zero Wind degrees, fifteen knots, Max only given if >= 10KT greater than the mean. VRB = variable. 00000KT = calm. 31015G27KT direction/speed max twenty seven Wind direction is given in degrees true. knots' 'varying between two Extreme direction 280V350 eight zero and three Variation given in clockwise direction, but only when mean speed is greater than 3 KT. variance five zero degrees' 3 Visibility 'three thousand two Prevailing visibility 3200 0000 = 'less than 50 metres' 9999 = 'ten kilometres or more'. No direction is required. hundred metres' Minimum visibility 'Twelve hundred The minimum visibility is also included alongside the prevailing visibility when the visibility in one (in addition to the 1200SW metres to the south- direction, which is not the prevailing visibility, is less than 1500 metres or less than 50% of the prevailing visibility west' prevailing visibility. A direction is also added as one of the eight points of the compass.
    [Show full text]
  • METAR/SPECI Reporting Changes for Snow Pellets (GS) and Hail (GR)
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N JO 7900.11 NOTICE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Effective Date: Air Traffic Organization Policy September 1, 2018 Cancellation Date: September 1, 2019 SUBJ: METAR/SPECI Reporting Changes for Snow Pellets (GS) and Hail (GR) 1. Purpose of this Notice. This Notice coincides with a revision to the Federal Meteorological Handbook (FMH-1) that was effective on November 30, 2017. The Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) approved the changes to the reporting requirements of small hail and snow pellets in weather observations (METAR/SPECI) to assist commercial operators in deicing operations. 2. Audience. This order applies to all FAA and FAA-contract weather observers, Limited Aviation Weather Reporting Stations (LAWRS) personnel, and Non-Federal Observation (NF- OBS) Program personnel. 3. Where can I Find This Notice? This order is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and http://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/. 4. Cancellation. This notice will be cancelled with the publication of the next available change to FAA Order 7900.5D. 5. Procedures/Responsibilities/Action. This Notice amends the following paragraphs and tables in FAA Order 7900.5. Table 3-2: Remarks Section of Observation Remarks Section of Observation Element Paragraph Brief Description METAR SPECI Volcanic eruptions must be reported whenever first noted. Pre-eruption activity must not be reported. (Use Volcanic Eruptions 14.20 X X PIREPs to report pre-eruption activity.) Encode volcanic eruptions as described in Chapter 14. Distribution: Electronic 1 Initiated By: AJT-2 09/01/2018 N JO 7900.11 Remarks Section of Observation Element Paragraph Brief Description METAR SPECI Whenever tornadoes, funnel clouds, or waterspouts begin, are in progress, end, or disappear from sight, the event should be described directly after the "RMK" element.
    [Show full text]
  • KMD 550/850 Multi-Function Display Flight Information Services (FIS) Pilot’S Guide Addendum
    N B KMD 550/850 Multi-Function Display Flight Information Services (FIS) Pilot’s Guide Addendum For Software Version 02/02 and later Revision 6 Feb/2009 006-18237-0000 The information contained in this manual is for reference use only. If any information contained herein conflicts with similar information contained in the Airplane Flight Manual Supplement, the information in the Airplane Flight Manual Supplement shall take precedence. WARNING The enclosed technical data is eligible for export under License Designation NLR and is to be used solely by the individual/organization to whom it is addressed. Diversion contrary to U.S. law is prohibited. COPYRIGHT NOTICE Copyright © 2001, 2002, 2004, 2007, 2009 Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication or any portion thereof by any means without the express written permission of Honeywell International Inc. is prohibited. For further information contact the Manager, Technical Publications; Honeywell, One Technology Center, 23500 West 105th Street, Olathe, Kansas 66061. Telephone: (913) 782-0400. Revision History Manual KMD 550/850 Flight Information Services (FIS) Pilot’s Guide Addendum Revision 6, February 2009 Part Number 006-18237-0000 Summary Added XM products: Precipitation Type (at Surface) Freezing Levels Winds Aloft Translated Metars Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR’s) R-1 Revision History Manual KMD 550/850 Flight Information Services (FIS) Pilot’s Guide Addendum Revision 5, March 2007 Part Number 006-18237-0000 Summary Added XM Receiver functionality. R-2 Revision History Manual KMD 550/850 Flight Information Services (FIS) Pilot’s Guide Addendum Revision 4, November 2004 Part Number 006-18237-0000 Summary Add FIS Area Products (AIRMETs, SIGMETs, Convective SIGMETs and Alert Weather Watches).
    [Show full text]
  • Indoor Air Quality in Commercial and Institutional Buildings
    Indoor Air Quality in Commercial and Institutional Buildings OSHA 3430-04 2011 Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing enforcement of the standards developed under the Act; by assisting and encouraging the States in their efforts to assure safe and healthful working conditions; by providing for research, information, education, and training in the field of occupational safety and health.” This publication provides a general overview of a particular standards-related topic. This publication does not alter or determine compliance responsibili- ties which are set forth in OSHA standards, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. More- over, because interpretations and enforcement poli- cy may change over time, for additional guidance on OSHA compliance requirements, the reader should consult current administrative interpretations and decisions by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the courts. Material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission. Source credit is requested but not required. This information will be made available to sensory- impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 693-1999; teletypewriter (TTY) number: 1-877- 889-5627. Indoor Air Quality in Commercial and Institutional Buildings Occupational Safety and Health Administration U.S. Department of Labor OSHA 3430-04 2011 The guidance is advisory in nature and informational in content. It is not a standard or regulation, and it neither creates new legal obligations nor alters existing obligations created by OSHA standards or the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Forecast Impact from Aircraft, Profiler, Rawinsonde, VAD, GPS-PW, METAR and Mesonet Observations for Hourly Assimilation in the RUC
    16.2 Relative forecast impact from aircraft, profiler, rawinsonde, VAD, GPS-PW, METAR and mesonet observations for hourly assimilation in the RUC Stan Benjamin, Brian D. Jamison, William R. Moninger, Barry Schwartz, and Thomas W. Schlatter NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 1. Introduction A series of experiments was conducted using the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) model/assimilation system in which various data sources were denied to assess the relative importance of the different data types for short-range (3h-12h duration) wind, temperature, and relative humidity forecasts at different vertical levels. This assessment of the value of 7 different observation data types (aircraft (AMDAR and TAMDAR), profiler, rawinsonde, VAD (velocity azimuth display) winds, GPS precipitable water, METAR, and mesonet) on short-range numerical forecasts was carried out for a 10-day period from November- December 2006. 2. Background Observation system experiments (OSEs) have been found very useful to determine the impact of particular observation types on operational NWP systems (e.g., Graham et al. 2000, Bouttier 2001, Zapotocny et al. 2002). This new study is unique in considering the effects of most of the currently assimilated high-frequency observing systems in a 1-h assimilation cycle. The previous observation impact experiments reported in Benjamin et al. (2004a) were primarily for wind profiler and only for effects on wind forecasts. This new impact study is much broader than that the previous study, now for more observation types, and for three forecast fields: wind, temperature, and moisture. Here, a set of observational sensitivity experiments (Table 1) were carried out for a recent winter period using 2007 versions of the Rapid Update Cycle assimilation system and forecast model.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Against Vapor Explosions with Water Mist
    PROTECTING AGAINST VAPOR EXPLOSIONS WITH WATER MIST J. R. Mawhinney and R. Darwin Hughes Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION This paper examines a number of practical questions about the possibility of using water mist to mitigate explosion hazards in some industrial applications. Water mist systems have been installed to replace Halon 1301 in gas compressor modules on Alaska’s North Slope oil fields. The hazard in the compressor modules includes fire in lubrication oil lines for the gas turbines that drive the compressors. The hazard also involves the potential for a methane gas leak, ignition, and explosion, although the probabilities of occurrence for the explosion hazard are not the same as the lube oil fire. The performance objective for the original halon systems was to inert the compartment, thus addressing both fire and explosion concerns. The design concentra- tions for the compressor modules were closer to 1.5% than to S%, indicating they were intended to provide an inerting effect. As part of the global move to eliminate ozone-depleting fire sup- pression agents, companies are replacing Halon 1301 systems with water mist systems. The water mist systems were developed and tested for control of liquid fuel or lubricating oil spray or pool fires associated with the turbines that drive the gas compressors. The water mist systems address the most likely hazard, the lube oil fire, hut the inerting benefit provided by Halon I301 has been lost. This has left the question of what to do if there is a methane gas leak unanswered. The question has been asked by the operators of these modules as to whether water mist can provide any benefit for mitigating the gas-air explosion hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Contained in a METAR Example METAR Codes
    METAR METAR is a format for reporting weather information. A METAR weather report is predominantly used by pilots in fulfillment of a part of a pre-flight weather briefing, and by meteorologists, who use aggregated METAR information to assist in weather forecasting. Raw METAR is the most common format in the world for the transmission of observational weather data. [citation needed] It is highly standardized through the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which allows it to be understood throughout most of the world. Information contained in a METAR A typical METAR contains data for the temperature, dew point, wind speed and direction, precipitation, cloud cover and heights, visibility, and barometric pressure. A METAR may also contain information on precipitation amounts, lightning, and other information that would be of interest to pilots or meteorologists such as a pilot report or PIREP, colour states and runway visual range (RVR). In addition, a short period forecast called a TRED may be added at the end of the METAR covering likely changes in weather conditions in the two hours following the observation. These are in the same format as a Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF). The complement to METARs, reporting forecast weather rather than current weather, are TAFs. METARs and TAFs are used in VOLMET broadcasts. Example METAR codes International METAR codes The following is an example METAR from Burgas Airport in Burgas, Bulgaria. It was taken on 4 February 2005 at 16:00 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). METAR LBBG 041600Z 12003MPS 310V290 1400 R04/P1500 R22/P1500U +S BK022 OVC050 M04/M07 Q1020 OSIG 9949//91= • METAR indicates that the following is a standard hourly observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Aviation Routine Weather Report (METAR) (Front)
    Key to Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Aviation Routine Weather Report (METAR) (Front) KEY to AERODROME FORECAST (TAF) and U.S. Department of Transportation AVIATION ROUTINE WEATHER REPORT Federal Aviation (METAR) (FRONT) Administration TAF KPIT 091730Z 091818 15005KT 5SM HZ FEW020 WS010/31022KT FM 1930 30015G25KT 3SM SHRA OVC015 TEMPO 2022 1/2SM +TSRA OVC008CB FM0100 27008KT 5SM SHRA BKN020 OVC040 PROB40 0407 1SM -RA BR FM1015 18005KT 6SM -SHRA OVC020 BECMG 1315 P6SM NSW SKC METAR KPIT 091955Z COR 22015G25KT 3/4SM R28L/2600FT TSRA OVC010CB 18/16 A2992 RMK SLP045 T01820159 FORECAST EXPLANATION REPORT TAF Message type : TAF-routine or TAF AMD-amended forecast, METAR METAR-hourly, SPECI-special or TESTM-non-commissioned ASOS report KPIT ICAO location indicator KPIT 091730Z Issuance time: ALL times in UTC “Z”, 2-digit date, 4-digit time 091955Z 091818 Valid period: 2-digit date, 2-digit beginning, 2-digit ending times In U.S. METAR: CORrected of; or AUTOmated ob for automated COR report with no human intervention; omitted when observer logs on 15005KT Wind: 3 digit true-north direction , nearest 10 degrees (or VaRiaBle); 22015G25KT next 2-3 digits for speed and unit, KT (KMH or MPS); as needed, Gust and maximum speed; 00000KT for calm; for METAR, if direction varies 60 degrees or more, Variability appended, e.g., 180V260 5SM Prevailing visibility; in U.S., Statute Miles & fractions; above 6 miles in 3/4SM TAF Plus6SM. (Or, 4-digit minimum visibility in meters and as required, lowest value with direction) Runway Visual Range: R; 2-digit runway designator Left, Center, or R28L/2600FT Right as needed; “/”, Minus or Plus in U.S., 4-digit value, FeeT in U.S., (usually meters elsewhere); 4-digit value Variability 4-digit value (and tendency Down, Up or No change) HZ Significant present, forecast and recent weather: see table (on back) TSRA FEW020 Cloud amount, height and type: SKy Clear 0/8, FEW >0/8-2/8, OVC 010CB SCaTtered 3/8-4/8, BroKeN 5/8-7/8, OVerCast 8/8; 3-digit height in hundreds of ft; Towering CUmulus or CumulonimBus in METAR; in TAF, only CB.
    [Show full text]
  • Ront November-Ddecember, 2002 National Weather Service Central Region Volume 1 Number 6
    The ront November-DDecember, 2002 National Weather Service Central Region Volume 1 Number 6 Technology at work for your safety In this issue: Conceived and deployed as stand alone systems for airports, weather sensors and radar systems now share information to enhance safety and efficiency in the National Airspace System. ITWS - Integrated Jim Roets, Lead Forecaster help the flow of air traffic and promote air Terminal Aviation Weather Center safety. One of those modernization com- Weather System The National Airspace System ponents is the Automated Surface (NAS) is a complex integration of many Observing System (ASOS). technologies. Besides the aircraft that fly There are two direct uses for ASOS, you and your family to vacation resorts, and the FAA’s Automated Weather or business meetings, many other tech- Observing System (AWOS). They are: nologies are at work - unseen, but critical Integrated Terminal Weather System MIAWS - Medium to aviation safety. The Federal Aviation (ITWS), and the Medium Intensity Intensity Airport Administration (FAA) is undertaking a Airport Weather System (MIAWS). The Weather System modernization of the NAS. One of the technologies that make up ITWS, shown modernization efforts is seeking to blend in Figure 1, expand the reach of the many weather and aircraft sensors, sur- observing site from the terminal to the en veillance radar, and computer model route environment. Their primary focus weather output into presentations that will is to reduce delays caused by weather, Gust fronts - Evolution and Detection Weather radar displays NWS - Doppler FAA - ITWS ASOS - It’s not just for airport observations anymore Mission Statement To enhance aviation safety by Source: MIT Lincoln Labs increasing the pilots’ knowledge of weather systems and processes Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • KMD 550/850 FIS Cover R2 11/21/02 5:33 PM Page 1 N B KMD 550/850 Multi-Function Display Flight Information Services (FIS) Pilot’S Guide Addendum
    KMD 550/850 FIS Cover R2 11/21/02 5:33 PM Page 1 N B KMD 550/850 Multi-Function Display Flight Information Services (FIS) Pilot’s Guide Addendum For Software Version 01/11 or later Revision 2 November/2002 006-18237-0000 KMD 550/850 FIS Cover R2 11/21/02 5:33 PM Page 2 The information contained in this manual is for reference use only. If any information contained herein conflicts with similar information contained in the Airplane Flight Manual Supplement, the information in the Airplane Flight Manual Supplement shall take precedence. WARNING Prior to export of this document, review for export license requirement is need- ed. COPYRIGHT NOTICE © 2001, 2002 Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication or any portion thereof by any means without the express written permission of Honeywell International Inc. is prohibited. For further information contact the Manager, Technical Publications; Honeywell, One Technology Center, 23500 West 105th Street, Olathe, Kansas 66061. Telephone: (913) 782-0400. Supplemental Sheet 11/21/02 5:32 PM Page i SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET When studying the FIS Addendum, the following information may be helpful going in. FIS Datalink Weather gives a “situation awareness” of one’s position, or planned position, in relation to the weather. It is a tool that can be used to plan for the circumnavigation of severe weather (strategic planning). It cannot be used to attempt pene- tration of severe weather (tactical maneuvering) due to insuffi- cient resolution and relative age of the data. There are “regions of precipitous terrain” where coverage is not possible due to signal blockage by the terrain.
    [Show full text]