DOCSLIB.ORG

Title the Convergence of Influences on and Evolving Praxis of Mid-Twentieth Century British Theatre Design (1935-1965) Through A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title the Convergence of Influences on and Evolving Praxis of Mid-Twentieth Century British Theatre Design (1935-1965) Through A Title The convergence of influences on and evolving praxis of mid-twentieth century British theatre design (1935-1965) through a close study of selected works by Motley and Jocelyn Herbert Type Thesis URL http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/9194/ Date 2016 Citation Jump, Sophie V. (2016) The convergence of influences on and evolving praxis of mid-twentieth century British theatre design (1935-1965) through a close study of selected works by Motley and Jocelyn Herbert. PhD thesis, University of the Arts London. Creators Jump, Sophie V. Usage Guidelines Please refer to usage guidelines at http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/policies.html or alternatively contact [email protected]. License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Unless otherwise stated, copyright owned by the author The convergence of influences on and evolving praxis of mid-twentieth century British theatre design (1935-1965) through a close study of selected works by Motley and Jocelyn Herbert Sophie V Jump Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The degree is awarded by University of the Arts London August 2015 ABSTRACT This thesis examines key developments in theatre design in Britain between 1935-1965 through the lens of the praxis of the design trio known as Motley (active 1932-78) and of theatre designer Jocelyn Herbert (1917-2003). Analysis of their roles in the creation of the four theatre productions that are used as case studies, Romeo and Juliet (1935), Three Sisters (1938), The Kitchen (1959 & 1961) and Happy Days (1962) enables an evaluation of the complex threads of influence on Motley and Herbert both from within the UK and from the USA and Europe. Furthermore, it offers a close study of their working process including their relationships with directors and playwrights considering not only what they designed, but how and why. Critical engagement with theatre design practice has increased since the early 1990s but there is still very little evaluative literature about British theatre design during the period of this study, 1935-1965. To date there are only three books and three journal articles that specifically cover the seminal designers Motley and Herbert so there is scope for a broadened analysis and contextualisation of their practice. One of the original contributions to knowledge of this thesis is that it assesses the confluence of influences on Motley and Herbert and draws together the threads of connections between British, European and American theatre and the ethos of Michel Saint-Denis illustrating how these fed into Motley’s and Herbert’s work. Whilst acknowledging the complexity of theatre practice and of reconstructing past events, this thesis assesses a combination of archival design material, such as set and costume renderings and sketches, as well as written texts, press reviews and recorded interviews, and draws on my own experience as a theatre design practitioner. The four case studies enable an in-depth investigation of Motley’s and Herbert’s processes and practice, the circumstances in which they operated and how they negotiated these conditions, as well as indicating how the role of the theatre designer developed across the period 1935-1965. In approaching the four case studies from the point of view of design the thesis contributes a new layer to their intricate histories. By emphasising the significance of the professionalisation of the role of the theatre designer during this time and by revealing the connections between Motley, the London Theatre Studio, Herbert and the Royal Court Theatre it expands understanding of the period and reinforces the substantial contribution of design to British theatre history. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research would not have been possible without the unfailing commitment and guidance of my supervisors Professor Jane Collins, Dr Linda Sandino and Professor Eileen Hogan. Apart from their academic support I would like to thank them for their generosity in sharing their time and wisdom with me and for their unflagging encouragement in the writing of this thesis. In addition, I thank the Rootstein Hopkins Foundation for awarding me a doctoral bursary for the first three years of study, and the John Hodgson Theatre Research Trust for its contribution towards the fourth year. There are many people without whom I would not have been able to complete this thesis. I am particularly grateful to the following for their support and encouragement: Cathy Courtney who guided me through the Jocelyn Herbert Archive, patiently listening and responding to my thoughts and theories, and generously sharing her expertise and contacts; my mother, Harriet Devine, who has consistently provided practical and moral support; Jocelyn Herbert’s family, particularly Sandra Lousada for her help with particular queries and for allowing me access to her personal photographic archive; Donald Howarth, Stephan Hammes, Alex Wardle, Elizabeth Dawson and Caroline Townsend for allowing me to mine their knowledge and expertise; Susanne Thomas of Seven Sisters Group for waiting patiently and supportively for me to pursue this path; all the friends and colleagues who have at one time or other been subjected to my thoughts on the process of completing this thesis; David Gothard, Greer Crawley, Theresa Shiban and Vivienne Schadinsky for their consistent interest, enthusiasm and faith in my work. I would also like to thank all those who were interviewed for this thesis for their invaluable contribution to the research, including Trish Montemuro who provided thought provoking input that was unfortunately omitted from its written format due to the ultimate limitations of its scope. Finally, I would like to thank my husband Glyn Pritchard, and my children George and Cai for their patience, love and support. ii Figure 1: Jocelyn Herbert and Margaret ‘Percy’ Harris in 1999 (Courtney, 1999) iii CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Context4 1.2 Research background4 1.3 Literature review5 1.3.1 Biographies & monographs 9 1.4 Methodology17 1.4.1 Theoretical context 17 1.4.2 Interviews 19 1.4.3 Archives 21 1.5 Brief overview of each chapter25 Keydeinitions26 1.7 Establishing boundaries28 1.8 Summary29 CHAPTER TWO: Motley and Romeo and Juliet (1935) ..................................... 30 2.1 Context 33 2.1.1 Motley 33 2.1.2 Modern theatre design and New Stagecraft 36 2.1.2.1 Synthesis 37 2.1.2.2 Suggestion 39 2.1.2.3 Simplicity 40 2.1.3 Harley Granville-Barker and Shakespearean performance in twentieth century Britain 41 2.2 Romeo and Juliet (1935) case study43 2.2.1 Circumstances of the production 44 2.2.2 Motley’s process 45 2.2.2.1 Shakespeare’s scene divisions 46 2.2.3 Motley’s designs 49 2.2.3.1 Set designs 49 2.2.3.2 Costume designs 56 2.2.3.2.1 Motley Ltd 56 2.2.3.2.2 Costume process 59 2.2.3.3 Lighting 69 2.2.4 Reception 72 2.3 Summary 73 CHAPTER THREE: The London Theatre Studio and Three Sisters (1938) 74 3.1 Context77 3.1.1 Copeau, Saint-Denis and the Compagnie des Quinze 77 3.1.2 London Theatre Studio 82 3.1.2.1 Architecture 84 3.1.2.2 Design training 90 iv 3.1.2.3 The ground plan 92 3.1.2.4 The dramatic text 96 3.1.3 Chekhov in Britain 97 3.2 Three Sisters (1938) case study 99 3.2.1 Circumstances of the production 99 3.2.2 Motley’s process 104 3.2.2.1 Identifying authorship 105 3.2.3 Motley’s designs 109 3.2.3.1 Set designs 109 3.2.3.2 Costume designs 116 3.2.3.3 Lighting and sound 125 3.3 Summary 126 CHAPTER FOUR: The Royal Court Theatre and The Kitchen (1959 & 1961) ............................................................................................................................................129 4.1 Context132 4.1.1 The English Stage Company at the Royal Court Theatre (1956-) 132 4.1.2 The permanent surround at the Royal Court Theatre 135 4.1.3 The permanent wardrobe at the Royal Court Theatre 142 4.1.4 Repertory and ensemble at the Royal Court Theatre 144 4.1.5 Jocelyn Herbert 144 4.1.6 The Kitchen world premiere 151 4.2 The Kitchen (1959 & 1961) case study153 4.2.1 Circumstances of the production 153 4.2.2 Herbert’s design process 156 4.2.3 Herbert’s design 161 4.2.3.1 Set, lighting and sound 161 4.2.3.2 Costumes 167 4.3 Summary 168 CHAPTER FIVE: Samuel Beckett and Happy Days (1962) ..............................170 5.1 Context173 5.1.1 The Royal Court Theatre and Beckett 173 5.1.2 Beckett, performance and scenography 175 5.1.3 Jocelyn Herbert in 1962 177 5.2 Happy Days (1962) case study180 5.2.1 Conditions of the production 180 5.2.3 Herbert’s design 181 5.2.3.1 Herbert’s design process 181 5.2.3.2 Set designs 187 5.2.3.3 Costume 193 5.2.3.4 Critical reception 200 5.3 Summary 200 v CHAPTER SIX: Conclusion .......................................................................................203 Keypointsofindings204 204 6.1.2 The materials of theatre production - and what they reveal 206 Threadsofinluence 6.1.3 The evolving praxis of Motley and Herbert between 1935-1965 207 6.2 Relevance to contemporary practice209 6.2.1 Directors and designers 209 6.2.2 My perspective as a practitioner 210 6.2.3 Theatre design nomenclature 211 Relections211 6.3.1 Archival research 211 213 6.4 Further research215 Relectionsasaresearcher 6.5 Contribution to knowledge216 ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................................218 BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................................221
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1999 + Credits
    1 CARL TOMS OBE FRSA 1927 - 1999 Lorraine’ Parish Church Hall. Mansfield Nottingham Journal review 16th Dec + CREDITS: All work what & where indicated. 1950 August/ Sept - Exhibited 48 designs for + C&C – Cast & Crew details on web site of stage settings and costumes at Mansfield Art Theatricaila where there are currently 104 Gallery. Nottm Eve Post 12/08/50 and also in Nottm references to be found. Journal 12/08/50 https://theatricalia.com/person/43x/carl- toms/past 1952 + Red related notes. 52 - 59 Engaged as assistant to Oliver Messel + Film credits; http://www.filmreference.com/film/2/Carl- 1953 Toms.html#ixzz4wppJE9U2 Designer for the penthouse suite at the Dorchester Hotel. London + Television credits and other work where indicated. 1957: + Denotes local references, other work and May - Apollo de Bellac - awards. Royal Court Theatre, London, ----------------------------------------------------- 57/58 - Beth - The Apollo,Shaftesbuy Ave London C&C 1927: May 29th Born - Kirkby in Ashfield 22 Kingsway. 1958 Local Schools / Colleges: March 3 rd for one week ‘A Breath of Spring. Diamond Avenue Boys School Kirkby. Theatre Royal Nottingham. Designed by High Oakham. Mansfield. Oliver Messel. Assisted by Carl Toms. Mansfield Collage of Art. (14 years old). Programme. Review - The Stage March 6th Lived in the 1940’s with his Uncle and Aunt 58/59 - No Bed for Bacon Bristol Old Vic. who ran a grocery business on Station St C&C Kirkby. *In 1950 his home was reported as being 66 Nottingham Rd Mansfield 1959 *(Nottm Journal Aug 1950) June - The Complaisant Lover Globe Conscripted into Service joining the Royal Theatre, London.
    [Show full text]
  • Decolonising Knowledge
    DECOLONISING KNOWLEDGE Expand the Black Experience in Britain’s heritage “Drawing on his personal web site Chronicleworld.org and digital and print collection, the author challenges the nation’s information guardians to “detoxify” their knowledge portals” Thomas L Blair Commentaries on the Chronicleworld.org Users value the Thomas L Blair digital collection for its support of “below the radar” unreported communities. Here is what they have to say: Social scientists and researchers at professional associations, such as SOSIG and the UK Intute Science, Engineering and Technology, applaud the Chronicleworld.org web site’s “essays, articles and information about the black urban experience that invite interaction”. Black History Month archived Bernie Grant, Militant Parliamentarian (1944-2000) from the Chronicleworld.org Online journalists at the New York Times on the Web nominate THE CHRONICLE: www.chronicleworld.org as “A biting, well-written zine about black life in Britain” and a useful reference in the Arts, Music and Popular Culture, Technology and Knowledge Networks. Enquirers to UK Directory at ukdirectory.co.uk value the Chronicleworld.org under the headings Race Relations Organisations promoting racial equality, anti- racism and multiculturalism. Library”Govt & Society”Policies & Issues”Race Relations The 100 Great Black Britons www.100greatblackbritons.com cites “Chronicle World - Changing Black Britain as a major resource Magazine addressing the concerns of Black Britons includes a newsgroup and articles on topical events as well as careers, business and the arts. www.chronicleworld.org” Editors at the British TV Channel 4 - Black and Asian History Map call the www.chronicleworld.org “a comprehensive site full of information on the black British presence plus news, current affairs and a rich archive of material”.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis and Evaluation of the Acting Career Of
    AN ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE ACTING CAREER OF TALLULAH BANKHEAD APPROVED: Major Professor m Minor Professor Directororf? DepartmenDepa t of Speech and Drama Dean of the Graduate School AN ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE ACTING CAREER OF TALLULAH BANKHEAD THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Jan Buttram Denton, Texas January, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. THE BEGINNING OF SUCCESS 1 II. ACTING, ACTORS AND THE THEATRE 15 III. THE ROLES SHE USUALLY SHOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED • 37 IV. SIX WITH MERIT 76 V. IN SUMMARY OF TALLULAH 103 APPENDIX 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 129 CHAPTER I THE BEGINNING OF SUCCESS Tallulah Bankhead's family tree was filled with ancestors who had served their country; but none, with the exception of Tallulah, had served in the theatre. Both her grandfather and her mother's grandfather were wealthy Alabamians. The common belief was that Tallulah received much of her acting talent from her father, but accounts of her mother1s younger days show proof that both of her parents were vivacious and talented. A stranger once told Tallulah, "Your mother was the most beautiful thing that ever lived. Many people have said you get your acting talent from your father, but I disagree. I was at school with Ada Eugenia and I knew Will well. Did you know that she could faint on 1 cue?11 Tallulahfs mother possessed grace and beauty and was quite flamboyant. She loved beautiful clothes and enjoyed creating a ruckus in her own Southern world.* Indeed, Tallulah inherited her mother's joy in turning social taboos upside down.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 42Nd COMPARATIVE DRAMA CONFERENCE the Comparative Drama Conference Is an International, Interdisciplinary Event Devoted to All Aspects of Theatre Scholarship
    THE 42nd COMPARATIVE DRAMA CONFERENCE The Comparative Drama Conference is an international, interdisciplinary event devoted to all aspects of theatre scholarship. It welcomes papers presenting original investigation on, or critical analysis of, research and developments in the fields of drama, theatre, and performance. Papers may be comparative across disciplines, periods, or nationalities, may deal with any issue in dramatic theory and criticism, or any method of historiography, translation, or production. Every year over 170 scholars from both the Humanities and the Arts are invited to present and discuss their work. Conference participants have come from over 35 countries and all fifty states. A keynote speaker whose recent work is relevant to the conference is also invited to address the participants in a plenary session. The Comparative Drama Conference was founded by Dr. Karelisa Hartigan at the University of Florida in 1977. From 2000 to 2004 the conference was held at The Ohio State University. In 2005 the conference was held at California State University, Northridge. From 2006 to 2011 the conference was held at Loyola Marymount University. Stevenson University was the conference’s host from 2012 through 2016. Rollins College has hosted the conference since 2017. The Conference Board Jose Badenes (Loyola Marymount University), William C. Boles (Rollins College), Miriam M. Chirico (Eastern Connecticut State University), Stratos E. Constantinidis (The Ohio State University), Ellen Dolgin (Dominican College of Blauvelt), Verna Foster (Loyola University, Chicago), Yoshiko Fukushima (University of Hawai'i at Hilo), Kiki Gounaridou (Smith College), Jan Lüder Hagens (Yale University), Karelisa Hartigan (University of Florida), Graley Herren (Xavier University), William Hutchings (University of Alabama at Birmingham), Baron Kelly (University of Louisville), Jeffrey Loomis (Northwest Missouri State University), Andrew Ian MacDonald (Dickinson College), Jay Malarcher (West Virginia University), Amy Muse (University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Pages Layout MCBEAN.Indd
    Introduction The great photographer Angus McBean has stage performers of this era an enduring power been celebrated over the past fifty years chiefly that carried far beyond the confines of their for his romantic portraiture and playful use of playhouses. surrealism. There is some reason. He iconised Certainly, in a single session with a Yankee Vivien Leigh fully three years before she became Cleopatra in 1945, he transformed the image of Scarlett O’Hara and his most breathtaking image Stratford overnight, conjuring from the Prospero’s was adapted for her first appearance in Gone cell of his small Covent Garden studio the dazzle with the Wind. He lit the touchpaper for Audrey of the West End into the West Midlands. (It is Hepburn’s career when he picked her out of a significant that the then Shakespeare Memorial chorus line and half-buried her in a fake desert Theatre began transferring its productions to advertise sun-lotion. Moreover he so pleased to London shortly afterwards.) In succeeding The Beatles when they came to his studio that seasons, acknowledged since as the Stratford he went on to immortalise them on their first stage’s ‘renaissance’, his black-and-white magic LP cover as four mop-top gods smiling down continued to endow this rebirth with a glamour from a glass Olympus that was actually just a that was crucial in its further rise to not just stairwell in Soho. national but international pre-eminence. However, McBean (the name is pronounced Even as his photographs were created, to rhyme with thane) also revolutionised British McBean’s Shakespeare became ubiquitous.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTA Theater and the Proposed Designation of the Related Landmark Site (Item No
    Landmarks Preservation Commission August 6, 1985; Designation List 182 l.P-1309 ANTA THFATER (originally Guild Theater, noN Virginia Theater), 243-259 West 52nd Street, Manhattan. Built 1924-25; architects, Crane & Franzheim. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1024, Lot 7. On June 14 and 15, 1982, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the ANTA Theater and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 5). The hearing was continued to October 19, 1982. Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Eighty-three witnesses spoke in favor of designation. Two witnesses spoke in opposition to designation. The owner, with his representatives, appeared at the hearing, and indicated that he had not formulated an opinion regarding designation. The Commission has received many letters and other expressions of support in favor of this designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The ANTA Theater survives today as one of the historic theaters that symbolize American theater for both New York and the nation. Built in the 1924-25, the ANTA was constructed for the Theater Guild as a subscription playhouse, named the Guild Theater. The fourrling Guild members, including actors, playwrights, designers, attorneys and bankers, formed the Theater Guild to present high quality plays which they believed would be artistically superior to the current offerings of the commercial Broadway houses. More than just an auditorium, however, the Guild Theater was designed to be a theater resource center, with classrooms, studios, and a library. The theater also included the rrost up-to-date staging technology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lively Theatre There's a Revolution Afoot in Theatre Design, Believes
    A LIVELY THEatRE There’s a revolution afoot in theatre design, believes architectural consultant RICHARD PILBROW, that takes its cue from the three-dimensional spaces of centuries past The 20th century has not been a good time for theatre architecture. In the years from the 1920s to the 1970s, the world became littered with overlarge, often fan-shaped auditoriums that are barren in feeling and lacking in intimacy--places that are seldom conducive to that interplay between actor and audience that lies at the heart of the theatre experience. Why do theatres of the 19th century feel so much more “theatrical”? And why do so many actors and audiences prefer the old to the new? More generally, does theatre architecture really matter? There are some that believe that as soon as the house lights dim, the audience only needs to see and hear what happens on the stage. Perhaps audiences don’t hiss, boo and shout during a performance any more, but most actors and directors know that an audience’s reaction critically affects the performance. The nature of the theatre space, the configuration of the audience and the intimacy engendered by the form of the auditorium can powerfully assist in the formation of that reaction. A theatre auditorium may be a dead space or a lively one. Theatres designed like cinemas or lecture halls can lay a dead hand on the theatre experience. Happily, the past 20 years have seen a revolution in attitude to theatre design. No longer is a theatre only a place for listening or viewing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time Embarks on a Third Uk and Ireland Tour This Autumn
    3 March 2020 THE NATIONAL THEATRE’S INTERNATIONALLY-ACCLAIMED PRODUCTION OF THE CURIOUS INCIDENT OF THE DOG IN THE NIGHT-TIME EMBARKS ON A THIRD UK AND IRELAND TOUR THIS AUTUMN • TOUR INCLUDES A LIMITED SEVEN WEEK RUN AT THE TROUBADOUR WEMBLEY PARK THEATRE FROM WEDNESDAY 18 NOVEMBER 2020 Back by popular demand, the Olivier and Tony Award®-winning production of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time will tour the UK and Ireland this Autumn. Launching at The Lowry, Salford, Curious Incident will then go on to visit to Sunderland, Bristol, Birmingham, Plymouth, Southampton, Liverpool, Edinburgh, Dublin, Belfast, Nottingham and Oxford, with further venues to be announced. Curious Incident will also play for a limited run in London at Troubadour Wembley Park Theatre in Brent - London Borough of Culture 2020 - following the acclaimed run of War Horse in 2019. Curious Incident has been seen by more than five million people worldwide, including two UK tours, two West End runs, a Broadway transfer, tours to the Netherlands, Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore, China, Australia and 30 cities across the USA. Curious Incident is the winner of seven Olivier Awards including Best New Play, Best Director, Best Design, Best Lighting Design and Best Sound Design. Following its New York premiere in September 2014, it became the longest-running play on Broadway in over a decade, winning five Tony Awards® including Best Play, six Drama Desk Awards including Outstanding Play, five Outer Critics Circle Awards including Outstanding New Broadway Play and the Drama League Award for Outstanding Production of a Broadway or Off Broadway Play.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the 2015/2016 Financial Statement
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 National Theatre Page 1 of 87 PUBLIC BENEFIT STATEMENT In developing the objectives for the year, and in planning activities, the Trustees have considered the Charity Commission’s guidance on public benefit and fee charging. The repertoire is planned so that across a full year it will cover the widest range of world class theatre that entertains, inspires and challenges the broadest possible audience. Particular regard is given to ticket-pricing, affordability, access and audience development, both through the Travelex season and more generally in the provision of lower price tickets for all performances. Geographical reach is achieved through touring and NT Live broadcasts to cinemas in the UK and overseas. The NT’s Learning programme seeks to introduce children and young people to theatre and offers participation opportunities both on-site and across the country. Through a programme of talks, exhibitions, publishing and digital content the NT inspires and challenges audiences of all ages. The Annual Report is available to download at www.nationaltheatre.org.uk/annualreport If you would like to receive it in large print, or you are visually impaired and would like a member of staff to talk through the publication with you, please contact the Board Secretary at the National Theatre. Registered Office & Principal Place of Business: The Royal National Theatre, Upper Ground, London. SE1 9PX +44 (0)20 7452 3333 Company registration number 749504. Registered charity number 224223. Registered in England. Page 2 of 87 CONTENTS Public Benefit Statement 2 Current Board Members 4 Structure, Governance and Management 5 Strategic Report 8 Trustees and Directors Report 36 Independent Auditors’ Report 45 Financial Statements 48 Notes to the Financial Statements 52 Reference and Administrative Details of the Charity, Trustees and Advisors 86 In this document The Royal National Theatre is referred to as “the NT”, “the National”, and “the National Theatre”.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC MAG Spring 2018 32P A5 FC DS 90Gsm W + 4P 250Gsm Gloss
    SOIRÉES MUSICALES Spring 2018 ~ Edition 58 Bramwell Tovey The Magazine of the BBC Concert Orchestra’s Supporters Club President: Richard Baker OBE Vice Presidents: Nigel Blomiley, Cynthia Fleming & Martin Loveday Editor / Chairman: Brian Crouch 57A Chilvers Bank, Baldock Herts. SG7 6HT Tel : 01462 892 670 Other Ed and Photos: Jenny Thomas Treasurer: James McLauchlan Accounts: Jenny Thomas Minute Secretary: James Connelly Membership Secretary: Jenny Thomas Tours & Visits: John Harding Website: Stephen Greenhalgh Constitution: Jan Mentha Orchestra Representative: Marcus Broome Soirées Musicales is the Magazine of the BBC Concert Orchestra's Supporters Club, which is an independent body set up in 1983 for the purpose of promoting and supporting the Members of the BBC Concert Orchestra. We are not affiliated to the BBC, neither do we receive any financial support from them. Disclaimer: The views expressed by the contributors to this Magazine are not necessarily the views of the Chairman, the Orchestra or the BBC. All material © 2018 BBC Concert Orchestra's Supporters Club ED LINES. The old saying tells us that absence makes the heart grow fonder but when absence is prolonged perhaps the fondness becomes somewhat diminished. I write this as a consequence of many phone calls in recent years regarding the scant appearances on Radio2 of the BBC Concert Orchestra. A few years ago, we had 2 or3 regular broadcasts every week by our favourite orchestra, but now it is just usually one a week and sometimes not even that. I know that they appear from time to time on Radio3, but not in my opinion playing the type of music which they do best or indeed the music for which they were originally intended.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Theatre Extract
    Richard Eyre TALKING THEATRE Interviews with Theatre People Contents Introduction xiii Interviews John Gielgud 1 Peter Brook 16 Margaret ‘Percy’ Harris 29 Peter Hall 35 Ian McKellen 52 Judi Dench 57 Trevor Nunn 62 Vanessa Redgrave 67 NICK HERN BOOKS Fiona Shaw 71 London Liam Neeson 80 www.nickhernbooks.co.uk Stephen Rea 87 ix RICHARD EYRE CONTENTS Stephen Sondheim 94 Steven Berkoff 286 Arthur Laurents 102 Willem Dafoe 291 Arthur Miller 114 Deborah Warner 297 August Wilson 128 Simon McBurney 302 Jason Robards 134 Robert Lepage 306 Kim Hunter 139 Appendix Tony Kushner 144 John Johnston 313 Luise Rainer 154 Alan Bennett 161 Index 321 Harold Pinter 168 Tom Stoppard 178 David Hare 183 Jocelyn Herbert 192 William Gaskill 200 Arnold Wesker 211 Peter Gill 218 Christopher Hampton 225 Peter Shaffer 232 Frith Banbury 239 Alan Ayckbourn 248 John Bury 253 Victor Spinetti 259 John McGrath 266 Cameron Mackintosh 276 Patrick Marber 280 x xi JOHN GIELGUD Would you say the real father—or mother—of the National Theatre and the Royal Shakespeare Company is Lilian Baylis? Well, I think she didn’t know her arse from her elbow. She was an extraordinary old woman, really. And I never knew anybody who knew her really well. The books are quite good about her, but except for her eccentricities there’s nothing about her professional appreciation of Shakespeare. She had this faith which led her to the people she needed. Did she choose the actors? I don’t think so. She chose the directors. John Gielgud Yes, she had a very difficult time with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern British, Irish and East Anglian Art Tuesday 19 November 2013 at 1Pm Knightsbridge, London
    Modern British, Irish and East Anglian Art Tuesday 19 November 2013 at 1pm Knightsbridge, London Modern British, Irish and East Anglian Art Tuesday 19 November 2013 at 1pm Knightsbridge Bonhams Bids Enquiries Please see page 2 for bidder Montpelier Street +44 (0) 20 7447 7448 Modern British & Irish Art information including after-sale Knightsbridge +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax Emma Corke collection and shipment London SW7 1HH To bid via the internet please visit +44 (0) 20 7393 3949 www.bonhams.com www.bonhams.com [email protected] Please see back of catalogue for important notice to bidders Viewings Please note that bids should be Shayn Speed submitted no later than 24 hours +44 (0) 20 7393 3909 Illustration [email protected] East Anglian Pictures only before the sale. Front cover: Lot 91 The Guildhall Back cover: Lot 216 East Anglian Pictures Guildhall Street New bidders must also provide Inside front: Lot 46 Daniel Wright Bury St Edmunds proof of identity when submitting Inside back: Lot 215 +44 (0) 1284 716195 Suffolk, IP33 1PS bids. Failure to do this may result [email protected] in your bids not being processed. Tuesday 5 November 9am to 7pm Bidding by telephone will only be Customer Services Monday to Friday 8.30am to 6pm Wednesday 6 November accepted on a lot with a lower +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 9am to 4pm estimate in excess of £400. ----------- St Michael’s Hall Sale Number: 20779 Church Street Live online bidding is Reepham available for this sale Catalogue: £12 Norfolk, NR10 4JW Please email [email protected] with “Live bidding” in the subject Tuesday 12 November line 48 hours before the auction 9am to 7pm to register for this service.
    [Show full text]