DOCSLIB.ORG

LDF AG MEETING: 9 SEPT 2010 SUMMARY of THIRD PARTY REPRESENTATIONS (As at 4.00Pm, 8.9.10)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LDF AG MEETING: 9 SEPT 2010 SUMMARY of THIRD PARTY REPRESENTATIONS (As at 4.00Pm, 8.9.10) LDF AG MEETING: 9 SEPT 2010 SUMMARY OF THIRD PARTY REPRESENTATIONS (As at 4.00pm, 8.9.10) Date of Name Organisation Request to Written Subject of comments Ref email speak? comments submitted? 1.9.10 James Farmer X 9 Bow Brickhill Consortium land (south of B-B railway) and EWR 1 1.9.10 Clive Faine Abbeygate 9 X Economic development, CMK review - 3.9.10 Stuart Turner ? 9 Level of growth; retain the SE SDA 2 3.9.10 Alan Francis 9 Promised - 4.9.10 Alice Cramplin CPRE (Beds Branch) X 9 Support deletion of SE SDA; need to review assumptions about 3 development in neighbouring areas 4.9.10 Fran Fry Woburn Sands & X 9 SE SDA changes (support and outstanding concerns) 4 District Society 6.9.10 Katherine Else RPS Group (for Old X 9 Tickford Fields Farm 5 Road Securities) 6.9.10 Jennifer Lampert J Lampert Associates X 9 Derivation of housing targets; deletion of SE SDA (clients’ land 6 holdings affected) 6.9.10 Julia Upton MK Community ? X Expressed an interest in attending LDF AG meeting - Foundation 7.9.10 Kevin Coleman JB Planning Associates 9 9 Derivation of housing targets; revised boundary for SE SDA 7 7.9.10 Mick Moutrie 9 9 Economic prosperity / 2 speed city 8 7.9.10 David Jackson Savills (for SE MK 9 9 5 August LDF AG papers; housing requirements; site capacity; 9 Consortium) employment land requirement; infrastructure delivery plan; Core Strategy end date. NB Comments drafted prior to papers for 9 Sept LDF AG being available (1) IH / 8.9.10 Date of Name Organisation Request to Written Subject of comments Ref email speak? comments submitted? Further reps received after 7.9.10 8.9.10 P Mavrogordato X 9 Church Farm SRA; land at Wavendon Lodge. Need to continue 10 to plan for next 20 years nor just for the short term Letter, not email 8.9.10 Andrew Thomas MK Forum X 9 Process of amending the CS; interim position; commitment to 11 review 8.9.10 Tom Whild Terence O’Rourke (for ? 9 The letter previously sent to the Chief Executive following the 12 various landowners in LDF AG meeting on 5 August the SE SDA) 8.9.10 Roger Turnbull Apt Planning (for X 9 Supports higher target of 2,000 homes per year 13 Realmoak and Corran Wakefield) (2) IH / 8.9.10 49 Vandyke Close Woburn Sands Milton Keynes MK17 8UU 31ST August 2010 Ref: Milton Keynes Core Strategy Please could you consider the following points whilst reviewing the core strategy? Milton Keynes growth should encourage a modal shift from the car, and towards the use of the soon to be upgraded East West Rail link. Therefore development should be fundamentally based on capturing the economic benefits associated with linking Milton Keynes to the knowledge based hubs of Oxford & Cambridge. I would categorically oppose any growth west of the M1, this would in no way support the regionally important East West Rail, and additionally the huge costs involved with crossing the motorway would be prohibitive. Milton Keynes South East SDA could be based on 10,400 dwellings to accommodate the expected population growth in the South East, and to provide a fair chance for future generations to get on the property ladder. To cut growth targets would force up the cost of homes locally by restricting supply, and social housing would become a scarce commodity, previous generations have been provided a plentiful supply of homes, but now it seems the people who benefitted from previous growth feel that younger people cannot be given the same right to a roof over their heads. The spatial strategy should be changed to include development land south of the Bedford - Bletchley railway (the Bow Brickhill Development Consortium site) this is the most supportive site associated with EWR I have recently consulted with a senior planner at the Government of the South East who has confirmed the implementation of the East West Rail will only be possible if planning permission is granted for sufficient homes along the rail link. Therefore I would urge Milton Keynes Council to retain the South East SDA, and seek to retain the existing housing targets. Yours Faithfully Mr J Farmer (3) Local Development Framework Advisory Group. Proposed Changes to the Core Strategy. Introduction The revocation of regional spatial strategies by the Secretary of State has prompted a review of the Core Strategy. However there is cross party agreement that the published Core Strategy remains unchanged, subject only to the local perspective following, primarily, the revocation of regional spatial strategies (RSS), and that MK will remain a prime growth area. Proposed changes Councillor Galloway as chair, and Councillors Hopkins and White of the Local Development Framework Advisory Group (LDFAG) have prepared a draft paper that contains a list of the detailed changes under consideration. These details are contained within the ‘Supplementary paper: What next for the Core Strategy?’ This information was tabled as supplementary Item 5 at the 26th August 2010 LDFAG meeting. Extent & scope of policy change The introductory note to supplementary Item 5 talks about policy directions and item 3.2 refers to a motion already agreed by the LDFAG on the 5th August which points to a revised policy direction for the Core Strategy which seems to go beyond the intent as indicated by the cross party group above. A more detailed explanation of the policy direction is required with a much clearer explanation of what represents a proposal. A number of the noted items in the motion agreed at the 5th August meeting of the LDFAG now appear to have become proposals and detailed as proposed changes in supplementary Item 5. Some items appear to contradict each other. For example the bringing forward and reliance on of the strategic reserve sites (SRS) for housing has become a proposal, despite the possibility of this meaning a possible deficit in housing land supply over a 15-year period. This reliance would also limit the planning capability to devise a sustainable development framework and the development of a zero carbon city. Development context As a practitioner I am interested in the success of Milton Keynes, the development of a sustainable community, and the creation of a built environment to support the Core Strategy vision as explained in Section 4 of the Core Strategy ‘ A Vision for the Place’. Impact of changes on vision There is concern that proposed changes go beyond a focus that is limited to the revocation of regional spatial strategies. While this may be unintentional the proposed changes start to impact on the heart of the vision for the Core Strategy and ultimately our ability to deliver a sustainable built environment. Without further consideration of the changes we could be creating a situation (4) that leads to a comprehensive review of the Core Strategy and a further period of uncertainty and limited progress that could extent beyond a point when we could be emerging from the current downturn. These and the following arguments are based on the premise that growth is a necessary part of the economic strength of MK and is essential to our success and ability to deliver what we want for MK. Housing targets & delivery rates Item 3. 2 of the introductory note to supplementary Item 5 includes a number of statements that when taken together draw the conclusion that all the Strategic Development Areas (SDA) are no longer required. This conclusion is based on an assumption about a revised housing target that is not yet agreed, and on a belief that we need only rely on existing land supply commitments and possible some or all of the current Strategic Reserve Sites. This approach is questioned. There appears to be a presumption made that growth and housing numbers for the next 15 years can be based on a completion rate of no greater than 1,500 – 2000 homes per year, that the projected housing figure can be built around this, and that, as a consequence the current land supply will be sufficient. These rates if projected would add up to something in the order of 22,500 to 30,000 homes over a 15-year period. As things stand there is a land supply in place for approximately 20,000 dwellings that could last 10 years. At a delivery rate of 1,500 homes per year the land supply could be used up within 13.3 years and a rate of 2000 homes per year within 10 years. Well before the end of the plan period of 2026. To put this in perspective an upper figure of 2000 homes per year is ambitious. For example the average yearly figure over a period from 1991 to 2009 was 1,600 dwelling completions. However the anticipated low number of houses to be delivered over the next couple of years should not be used as a reason for running down a land bank. Under the governments policy in PPS3 the local authority is required to show that they have a 15-year supply of housing land, which if the MKC is committed to a sustainable growth programme this supply should relate to a properly planned development framework. There is a concern that by adopting the proposed approach that the strategic position and an ability to plan for long term growth is being compromised. As a consequences growth will be dependent on the development of a number of smaller and fragmented development areas and that because of their location, shape and size this will means that the ability to plan and coordinate development in a coherent way will be lost.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MK Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development
    October 2016 Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas FINAL Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas 1 St John’s Square Final Report London, EC1M 4DH T: +44 (0)207 253 2929 Prepared by Gillespies LLP F: +44 (0)207 253 3900 October 2016 www.gillespies.co.uk Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Identification of Development Model and Landscape Attributes 8 4 Susceptibility Criteria 8 5 Assessment of Landscape Sensitivity to Residential Development 10 6 Landscape Assessments 11 INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction 1.1.1 Milton Keynes Council (MKC) is currently developing 1.1.3 The main aims of this study are; a new Local Plan. Planning to meet housing need will be a key part of Plan:MK. This is to comply with the requirement in the To assess the sensitivity of the 30 landscape areas around National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Paragraph 14) that Milton Keynes, Newport Pagnell, Woburn Sands and Olney to residential development Local Plans should met objectively-assessed needs unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably To identify where particular land areas may have greater or outweigh the benefits, or that specific policies in the NPPF indicate less capacity for residential development that development should be restricted. In assessing potential site options, the NPPF states that ‘allocations of land for development should prefer land of less environmental value’ (Paragraph 17). The Local Plan should bring forward allocations which are consistent with these various requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Land Allocation Development Framework
    Urban Design & Landscape Architecture Strategic Land Allocation Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/urban-design DRAFT July 2012 This document has been prepared by Milton Keynes Council’s Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Team. For further information please contact: Neil Sainsbury Head of Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Planning, Economy and Development Group Milton Keynes Council Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ T +44 (0) 1908 252708 F +44 (0) 1908 252329 E [email protected] 2 Contents SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION SECTION 3 DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK SECTION 5 NEXT STEPS 1.1 Introduction 7 3.1 Introduction 31 5.1 Outline Application 57 1.2 Role of Development Framework 7 3.2 The Vision 31 5.2 Design and Access Statements 57 1.3 Community Engagement 8 3.3 Core Concept 32 5.3 Design Codes 57 1.4 Status of Development Framework 8 3.4 Landscape and Open Space Strategy 33 5.4 Reserved Matters Applications 57 1.5 Planning Policy Background 9 3.5 Movement Framework 37 5.5 Programme and milestones 57 3.6 Land Uses 43 3.7 Character 46 APPENDICES SECTION 2 THE SITE AND ITS CONTEXT 3.8 Sustainability 48 3.9 Indicative Development Framework Plan 50 A Planning Policy Context 59 2.1 Introduction 13 3.10 Indicative Land Use Budget 51 A1 Core Strategy 59 2.2 Strategic Land Allocation 13 A2 Local Plan 61 SECTION 4 PHASING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY 2.2 Surrounding Area and Edge Conditions 15 B Open space Requirements 65 2.3 Topography, Views and Drainage 17 C Indicative
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT INCLUDING PARKING ASSESSMENT CIVIC ENGINEERS December 2020
    TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT INCLUDING PARKING ASSESSMENT CIVIC ENGINEERS December 2020 1 Civic Engineers Job Title Prepared for Love Wolverton Love Wolverton Report Type Date Transport Assessment including Parking Assessment ISSUE v09 10 December 2020 Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Commission .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Development Description ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Development Proposals and Vision ......................................................................................................................... 4 Report Content ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Planning History ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Existing Site and Transport Context .................................................................................................................. 6 Site Location .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stantonbury Neighbourhood Plan
    STANTONBURY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN BANCROFT | BANCROFT PARK | BLUE BRIDGE | LINFORD WOOD BRADVILLE | OAKRIDGE PARK | STANTONBURY | STANTONBURY FIELDS SNP 10 MATHIESEN ROAD SNP 11 WYLIE/HARROWDEN SNP 12 STANTON SCHOOL SNP 16 SNP11 STANTONBURY CAMPUS SNP 17 SNP17 ROWLE CLOSE GARAGES SNP12 SNP16 SNP10 SITE SPECIFIC POLICY LOCATIONS (Where new housing development is proposed) CONTENT Section Page Site Specific Policies 30 Foreword 4 Mathiesen Road 31 Executive Summary 5 Wylie/Harrowden 32 Aims & Objectives 8 Stanton School 33 Consultation 9 Bradville Sports & Heritage Area 34 About the area 11 North Bradville Regeneration 35 Neighbourhood Plan Policies 13 North Loughton Valley Park 36 Policy Summary 15 Stantonbury Campus 37 Rowle Close Garages 39 General Policies 16 Stantonbury Shops 40 Open Space & Leisure 17 Stantonbury Community Facilities 41 Parking Enhancements 19 Stanton Low Park 43 Design Principles 21 Linford Wood Employment Land 44 Housing Infill 22 Linford Wood 45 Houses in Multiple Occupation 23 Community Hubs 46 Grid Road Corridors 24 Key Links & Connectivity 25 Action Plan, Delivery & Monitoring Infrastructure Delivery 27 Action Plan, Delivery & Monitoring 47 Location of Facilities 29 Glossary 48 Figures Figure 1: Stantonbury Parish Area Map 4 Figure 2: Open Space & Leisure Map 18 Figure 3: Parking Enhancements Map 20 NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN | DRAFT - FEBRUARY 2018 3 FOREWORD Stantonbury Parish Council has prepared a Neighbourhood Plan for the Area formally designated by Milton Keynes Council on 16th June 2015 based on the provisions of The Localism Act 2011 and the Neighbourhood Planning ( General) Regulations 2012. The designated area is shown in Figure 1 and is home to 16,400 + residents. This Neighbourhood Plan is the embodiment of our aspirations, concerns, wellbeing and sustainability for the future of our Parish.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Partnership
    MILTON KEYNES PARTNERSHIP Milton Keynes Employment Land Study May 2007 GVA Grimley LLP 3 Brindleyplace Birmingham B1 2JB 0870 900 8990 www.gvagrimley.co.uk Milton Keynes Partnership Contents CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH .......................................................................1 2. POLICY AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT........................................................5 3. PROPERTY MARKET REVIEW............................................................................31 4. ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT AND POTENTIAL SUPPLY..................................53 5. FUTURE DEMAND – SHORT TERM/LONG TERM ..............................................75 6. CONTRASTING FUTURE DEMAND/SUPPLY......................................................99 7. COMPARATOR CITY ANALYSIS.......................................................................113 8. DELIVERY STRATEGY......................................................................................124 APPENDICES Appendix A- Existing Employment areas and Employment site proformas Appendix B- Methodology for ranking of employment sites Appendix C- Development Typologies Appendix D- CMK Plots May 07 Milton Keynes Partnership GVA Grimley LLP 1. INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH Brief 1.1 This chapter outlines our appreciation of the Brief and the key issues that have been taken into account as part of this work. Our involvement in preparing the Long Term Sustainable Growth Plan for Milton Keynes MK2031) has given us a wide understanding of the many issues driving growth in the area. 1.2
    [Show full text]
  • The Newport Pagnell Neighbourhood Plan, Referendum Version
    NEWPORT PAGNELL NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Status of Plan: REFERENDUM VERSION post examination Qualifying body: Newport Pagnell Town Council Duration of the Plan: The plan will be in force until 2031 The source of the Neighbourhood Plan This document has been prepared by the Newport Pagnell Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, which has been led by Newport Pagnell Town Council. TABLE OF CONTENTS Para. No. Section Page No. 1. What is this document about? INTRODUCTION to the Newport Pagnell 3 Neighbourhood Plan from the Mayor 2. What area does the Plan cover? 4 THE DESIGNATED AREA OF THE PLAN 3. Why do we need this Neighbourhood Plan? 5 THE MAIN CONCEPTS 3.3 What does the Plan do? 5 3.4 What are the main elements that lead to this Plan? 5 4. What gives us the right to make a Neighbourhood Plan for our Town? 8 THE LEGAL BACKGROUND TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD LAN 5. What is the Town like at the moment? 9 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TOWN 5.2 The people 9 5.3 The housing 10 5.4 Businesses, the Town Centre, main traffic links 11 5.5 Other built infrastructure 11 5.6 Quality of land and the natural environment 12 5.7 Schooling 13 5.8 Archaeology and History 13 5.9 Places of worship 14 5.10 Leisure and open space provision 16 5.11 Climate change issues 17 5.12 Design issues 17 5.13 Conclusions arising from examination of the town’s characteristics 17 6. What does the Neighbourhood Plan Achieve? THE VISION OF THE TOWN 18 COUNCIL and THE OBJECTIVES OF THE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 6.1 The vision of the Town Council and how this relates to the Plan 18 6.2 The objectives of the Neighbourhood Plan and how these relate to National 19 and Local Policies and the Neighbourhood Plan Policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy: Submission Version
    Core Strategy: Submission Version (4) Position Statement Milton Keynes Council Position Statement Land East of the M1 motorway i. The Secretary of State's Proposed Changes to the South East Plan (July 2008), include a recommendation in Policy MKAV1 (Housing Distribution by District 2006-2026) for "at least 5,600 dwellings by 2026 on suitable sites to the east of the M1 motorway" and that in order to bring about the step change in housing delivery, Core Strategy: Submission Version suitable sites in this location should be brought forward now. The Secretary of State recognises that further studies may be needed to test the ultimate scale of development suitable for this area after 2026 and to that end states that "The form of development east of the M1 motorway should not prejudice consideration of future development in the locality after 2026". ii. The reason given in the Proposed Changes for the introduction of the land to the east of the M1 is to help meet the Government's aims for a step change in housing provision. It also seems that the 5,600 homes proposed for this area are intended to compensate for the ‘lost’ homes proposed by the Panel for the Bedfordshire part of the South East Strategic Development Area (SDA). iii. Milton Keynes Council's response to the Proposed Changes consultation was agreed at Cabinet on 7 October 2008. In addition to approving the detailed comments on the Proposed Changes, Cabinet gave the go ahead to consideration of a legal challenge to the final version of the South East Plan should the allocation of land east of the M1 remain, subject to a report assessing the potential grounds for a challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastruct Plan Final Plan 310310
    Whaddon Chase Green Infrastructure Plan March 2010 Working in partnership with Whaddon Chase Community Green Infrastructure Plan Whaddon Chase Green Infrastructure Plan Contents Page Foreword 3 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Whaddon Chase Parish Council Involvement 4 3.0 Background to GI, Local Level GI Planning 5 Methodology and Links to Parish Plans 4.0 Whaddon Chase Context 7 5.0 Statement of Community Involvement 13 6.0 The GI Plan – Map and Aspirations 14 7.0 GI Aspiration Priorities 17 8.0 GI Aspiration Clusters 18 9.0 Draft Action Plan 22 Appendix 1 Definition of GI 27 Appendix 2 Community GI Planning Methodology 28 Appendix 3 FAQ’s about the Whaddon Chase Community GI 44 Plan Figure 1 Delivering GI aspirations in Bedfordshire 6 Figure 2 Whaddon Chase Statement of Significance Map 8 Figure 3 Whaddon Chase Green Infrastructure Map 14 Figure 4 GI Aspiration ‘Clusters’ Table 1 Whaddon Chase Statement of Significance 9 Summaries Table 2 South East Plan Policy identifying Strategic 12 Development Area Table 3 Specific aspirations identified for the project area 15 Table 4 Key priorities for the project area 17 Table 5 Priority GI Aspirations outside of the Whaddon 18 Chase boundary Table 6 Draft Action Plan for the delivery of GI aspirations 22 for Whaddon Chase 2 Whaddon Chase Community Green Infrastructure Plan Whaddon Chase Green Infrastructure Plan Foreword by Natural England Natural England is here to conserve and enhance the natural environment, for its intrinsic value, the wellbeing and enjoyment of people and the economic prosperity that it brings. Never before has the environment been under so much pressure (driven by rising populations) and never before has it been subject to so much change (driven by climate) as it is today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consultation Document
    Plan:MK Strategic Development Directions Consultation January 2016 www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/PlanMK Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 How to Comment 8 3 Longer Term Vision and Opportunities 10 4 Development Directions 14 5 Next Stages 42 6 Links and References 43 1 Milton Keynes Council | Plan:MK - Strategic Development Directions Consultation, January - April 2016 Section 1 Introduction Section 1 Introduction References' provides you with details of where to go if you want to find out more Introduction about any of the issues we cover in this consultation document or look at any of Milton Keynes is on a journey to create a the documents referred to. new Local Plan - we call it Plan:MK. This document is part of that journey, looking What is a Local Plan? What is Plan:MK? at ideas for the longer term growth of Milton Keynes that have come out of a As mentioned above, Plan:MK will be the series of workshops that took place in new Local Plan for the Borough of Milton Spring 2015. Keynes, covering a period of around 15 years from the date of adoption(1). Before we go into detail about those ideas, this section looks at what a Local Plan is A Local Plan will usually set out a Vision and why we need to have one; what the and Development Strategy for the whole starting point is for preparing Plan:MK; the of the Borough, and include policies that process we will go through as we move will guide developments of all sizes so that forward; and the work that has been done they help to deliver that Vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Planning Guidance on Planning Obligations for Education Facilities FOREWORD
    Supplementary Planning Guidance on Planning Obligations for Education Facilities FOREWORD This Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) identifies the main requirements for educational facilities, which may be required as a consequence of new development within the Borough. It also sets out the financial contributions, which will be sought by the Council, from applicants seeking planning consent for development, where that development generates a need for such facilities. The purpose of this document is to assist prospective developers by identifying the costs associated with their development. By providing this guidance the Council seeks to minimise uncertainty and time spent negotiating on individual planning applications and thus speed up the decision making process, in line with Government intentions for improving the planning system. This document was issued for an eight-week period of public consultation running from Thursday 8th July to Thursday 2nd September 2004 to enable members of the public and other interested parties to comment on its contents. The Council’s Cabinet considered representations received at its meeting on 16th November 2004. At the meeting, the Cabinet resolved to modify the document in light of the responses received and adopt it as Supplementary Planning Guidance. The Cabinet also resolved to use the annual Department for Education and Skills (DfES) figures on the average cost of providing a school place, and the relevant DfES cost multiplier for Milton Keynes, as the basis for seeking planning obligations for education facilities, and that this document be revised when the DfES produce new figures on the costs of providing a school place (including the local cost multiplier), without the need for a full scale review.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Phoenix Works
    Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Further Written Statement submitted on behalf of Gallagher Estates Limited (32326) June 2018 Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Further Written Statement submitted on behalf of Gallagher Estates Limited (32326) Project Ref: 20704/P12/A5 20704/P12a/A5 Status: Draft Final Issue/Rev: - a Date: 16th June 2018 19th June 2018 Prepared by: Michael Knott / Emily Ford Michael Knott / Emily Ford Checked by: Michael Knott Michael Knott Authorised by: Michael Knott Michael Knott The Blade Abbey Square Reading Berkshire. RG1 3BE Tel: 0118 943 0000 Ref: 20704/P12a/A5/MK/dw Fax: 0118 943 0001 Email: [email protected] Date: 19th June 2018 COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Barton Willmore LLP. All Barton Willmore stationery is produced using recycled or FSC paper and vegetable oil based inks. CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Response to Main Matter 16 (Policy NE5) 2 APPENDICES 1 - Suggested Main Modifications to Policy NE5 2 - Landscape and Visual Statement (Barton Willmore; June 2018) 3 - Sustainability Appraisal Review (Barton Willmore, June 2018) Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Introduction Gallagher Estates (32326) 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This written statement is submitted on behalf of Gallagher Estates Limited in response to Matter 16.w relating to Policy NE5 of the Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan (VALP). 1.2 This statement supplements the representations we submitted at the regulation 19 consultation stage on behalf of Gallagher Estates, relating to Land at Eaton Leys, Milton Keynes, an omission site located on the northern edge of Aylesbury Vale District.
    [Show full text]
  • Wylie End Bradville Pre-Application
    Urban Design & Landscape Architecture MKDP Pre-Application Wylie End Bradville www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/udla January 2015 Wylie End, Bradville Pre-application This document has been prepared by Milton Keynes Council’s Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Team. For further information please contact: Neil Sainsbury, Head of Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Planning and Transport Milton Keynes Council Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Milton Keynes, MK9 3EJ T +44 (0) 1908 254836 E [email protected] Produced in association with 2 Urban Design & Landscape Architecture Contents SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION Outline and purpose of the Document 1.0 Site Location and Context pg 5 The purpose of this document is to establish the broad 1.1 Site Boundary pg 6 planning and design parameters for development of 1.2 Site Photos pg 7 this site in line with the existing land use allocation and as per existing policy. The intention is that this document will provide a degree of clarity for a SECTION 2 THE SITE & OPTIONS developer when preparing a planning application. 2.0 Access pg 9 At the outset views were sought from the Parish 2.1 Proposed Uses pg 9 Council and Local Ward Members and where appropriate their comments were addressed in the 2.2 Key Principles pg 9 outline pre-application document. 2.3 Parameters Plan pg 9 This process ensures MKDP meet their obligation to obtain comment from Council Development 2.4 Option 1 pg 10 Management Officers before marketing the site. This 2.5 Option 2 pg 11 pre-application report concludes the process and sanctions MKDP to proceed to market.
    [Show full text]