veW/FS,
FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No. 1414
An introduction to food hygiene of the Anisakis larva.
By Keiichi Oishi, Shigemi Oka and Seiichi Josho
Original ti tl e: Anisakisu Yochu no Shokuhin Eiseigaku Josetsu.
From: Anisakisu Yochu no Shokuhin Eiseigaku Josetsu, 1-113, 1969.
Translated bY the Translation Bureau(NO) Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada
Fisheries Research Board of Canada Biological Station Nanaimo, B.C.
1970
270 pages typescri pt J 4 /4-
DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY • OF- STATE SECRÉTARIAT D'ÉTAT TRANSLATION BUREAU . •2 BUREAU DES TRADUCTIONS
é éi I FOREIGN LANGUAGES DIVISION DES LANGUES DIVISION CANADA ÉTRA NG ÈRES
TRANSLATED FROM - TRADUCTION DE INTO - . EN
Japanese English
AUTHOR - AUTEUR OISHI, Keiichi; OKA, Shigemi; JOSHO, Seiichi
■■•• TITLE IN ENGLISH - TITRE ANGLAIS An Introduction to Food Hygiene with Regard to the Anisakis Larva. Title in foreign language (transliterate foreign characters) Anisakisu Yochu no Shokuhin Eiseigaku Josetsu:
RE,F5RENCE IN FOREIGN I,ANGUAGE (NAME OF BOOK OR PUBLICATION) IN FULL. TRANSLITERATE FOREIGN CHA,RACTERS. REFERENCE EN LANGUE ETRANGERE (NOM DU LIVRE OU PUBLICATION), AU COMPLET.TRANSCRIRE EN CARACTERES PHONÉTIQUES.
Anisakisu Yochu no Shokuhin Eiseigaku Josetsu.
gl› REFERENCE IN ENGLISH - RÉFÉRENCE EN ANGLAIS An Introduction to Food Hygiene with Regard to the Anisakis Larva
PUBLISH ER - EDIT EUR - PAGE NUMBERS IN ORIGINAL Hakodate Shokuhin Kagaku Kenkyukai DATE OF PUBLICATION NUMÉROS DES PAGES DANS DATE DE PUBLICATION L'ORIGINAL (Hakodate Food Science Research 1 - 113 Societ YEAR ISSUE NO. VOLUME PLACE OF PUBLICATION ANNEE NUMERO NUMBER OF TYPED PAGES LIEU DE PUBLICATION k odate Ohtani 01 0 HanaK NOMBRE DE PAGES Womenls . Junior College, 51, Kameda DACTYLOGRAPHIÉES cho Hondori, Hakodate-shigai, 1969 270 Hokkaidv.
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Fisheries & Forestry TRANSLATION BUREAU NO. 5089 MIN ISTàRE-CLIENT NOTRE DOSSIER NO
BRANCH OR DIVISION Biological Station TRANSLATOR (INITIALS) N .0. DIRECTION OU DIVISION TRADUCTEUR (INITIALES)
PERSON flEQUESTING Mr. N.P. Boyce, Nanaimo, B.C. DATE COMPLETED DEMANDE_PAR ACHEVÉ LE May.2, 1969 '
YOUR NUMBER VOTRE DOSSIER N ° 76918-14 • On:y DATE OF REQUEST 27.1.70 DATE DE LA DEMANDE T R C NON É.0 • îç t)C.il1 s,..tizincent
503.200-10-e (REV. 2/86) ) -""t
DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECRÉTARIAT D'ÉTAT . TRANSLATION BUREAU BUREAU DES TRADUCTIONS FOREIGN LANGUAGES DIVISION DIVISION DES LANGUES ÉTRANGÈRES
CANADA
CLIENT'S NO. DEPARTMENT DIVISION/BRANCI-1 CITY N° DU CLIENT MINISTERE DIVISION/DIRECTION VILLE
769-18-14 Fisheries îf:' Forestry Biological Station Nanaimo, B.C.
BUREAU NO. LANGUAGE TRANSLATOR (INITIALS) DATE N° DU BUREAU LANGUE TRADUCTEUR (INITIALES)
5089 Japanese 1A.O.
AN INTRODUCTION TO FOOD HYGIENE WITH REGARD TO THE ANISAKIS LARVA
Keiichi -OISHI, Shigemi OKA and Seiichi JOSHO • (Department of Food Science, Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University.) (Hakodate Ohtani Women's Junior College.)
CONTENTS
Introduction 1
0 im I. Classification and Morphology of Anisakis 3 \141 e.f.e > Significance of Anisakis Classification 3 o 0 . Ï•3 0 Morphology of the Subfamily Anisakinae 4 l2 0 0 F- (1) Adult • es•E 0 *4: (2) Larva .> ? radikY,) ILJ • in LLJ ee
SOS-200-10-31 2
• Morphology of the Genus Anisakis 8 (1) Adult. (2) Larva. Summary 10 ' II. Life History and Ecology of Anisakis 12 Life History of Anisakis 12 Ecology of Anisakis 15 (1) Detection of Subfamily Anisakinae (Genus Anisakis) Larvae in Marine Pisces and Decapoda. (2) Distribution of Nematodes of the Genus Anisakis in Marine Mammals. (3) Distribution of Anisakis Larvae in Fish Bodies. I) Parasitic Conditions of the Larvae in Different Parts of Fish Bodies. In Parasitic Conditions of the Larvae in Fish Bodies of Different Ages. III) Parasitic Conditions of the Larvae for Different Fish Weights. IV) Parasitic Conditions of the Larvàe for Different Lèngths of Fish Body. (4) Monthly or Seasonal Distribution of Anisakis Larvae in Pisces. (5) Distribution of the Larvae in Pisces and Cephalopoda with Different Habitats. Summary 33
3
III. Anisakiasis . 35 Historical Background of Anisakiasis Research . . 35
. Epidemiology of Anisakiasis 37 (1) GeOgraphical Conditions of Outbreaks. (2) Dependence of Outbreaks on Sex. (3) Dependence of Outbreaks on Age. (4) Distribution of Gastric and Intestinal Types. (5) Summary Of. Epidemiology. Clinic and Tathology of Anisakiasis 42 Clinic. PathologY. • Etiology.
Diagnosis and Therapy of Anisakiasis 49 Diagnosis. Therapy. Summary • 54
IV. Experimehtal Anisakiasis 55 Significance of Experimental Anisakiasis 55 Mainly.Concerning the Localized Allergic Reaction 56 Mainly . Conàeiming the Conditions of.Larval Migration' into Host odies (Distribution and Detection of Larvae) Mainly COncerning the Factors of Both the Host and
Parasite Sides - 74 Mainly Concerning the Clinical State of Animals with
Anisakiasis Infection 79 4
Concerning Examples of Experiments in Other
Countries 79
Summary 80 V. Food Hygienic Countermeasures Against Anisakis Larvae , 81 Resistance of Anisakis Larvae ...... 81 (1) Resistance in Various Media. I) Salt Water. II) Bydrochloric Acid. III) Various Acids. IV) Various Alkalis. V) Various Nutriments. •VI) Various Seasonings. VII) Rearing Liquid, City Water, Distilled Water. VIII) Formalin. IX) Ethyl Alcohol. (2) Resistance to Various Temperatures. I) High Temperature. • II) Low Temperature. (3) Direct Killing Effect of Various Medicines
• Methods of Collecting Anisakis Larvae 95 Summary 96 VI. Problems Remaining in Anisakis Research 98
. . Conclusion S 99 References 100 5
INTRODUCTION 1
It cannot be denied that there is a prevailing trend for parasitic diseases to become a concern of the past in our country,. This is because new anthelmintics or specific chemotherapeutants have been developed against those parasites such as ascarids or àncylostomas whose infections were wide- . spread before the war or even a while after the war, and in addition infection prophylaxis such as the improvement . of eating habits, use of washing liquid and pervasion of chemical fertilizer, etc. have become established with reasonable results. However, in recent years parasitic diseases caused by helminths other than ascarids or ancylostomas - for instance pinworms - has increased, and the countermeasures against parasitic diseases in our country are being reviewed in a new perspective and are raising new problems in the fields of clinical medicine and public hygienics. One of these is anisakiasis which is to be described below. Although anisakiasis may be new to the layman, it has taken much attention and become a major topic among medical or parasitological societies. Although this disease has been warned against many times in newspapers (1966, 1968), it appears that the hygienic countermeasures are not enough and recognition by the general 6
population is low. It had been an established theory until recent years
at least . that a parasite whose proper hosts are originally various animals other than human beings does not have an infection ability towards man and does not demonstrate pathogenicity. Recently, the theory of visceral larva migrans proposed by Beaver et al. (1956) of the United States on the basis of research into symptoms shown when ascarids of dogs infest human bodies opened a new approach to the zoonosis problem. . That is, they demonstrated in human body experiments using the eggs of mature ascarids of dogs the fact that various kinds of helminths of mammals other than man enter the human body which is an abnormal host, and continue parasitic phenomena temporarily without becoming mature,
'? and there display varying pathogenicity and bring about clinically important diseases (fever, hepatomegaly, pneumonitis, eosinophilic leucocytes, blindness), and they also pointed out that there are many cases like these clinically. For example, it is known that 'human gnathostomiasis' or 'eosinophilic meningitis' may be caused in humans by the Consumption of freshwater fish or shellfish which are the intermediate host of Gnathostoma spinigerum in dogs and cats . and of Canton hemosite nematode in mice.
Anisakiasis is a disease caused by certain kinds of 7
larvae of the genus Anisakis, family Ascaroidea which infest marine mammals, when they enter the human body perorally through marine fish or cuttlefish, and this disease is under- stood to be included in the above-mentioned visceral larva migrans. The existence of anisakiasis was confirmed by Van Thiel (1960, 1962) in Holland. It was given much atten- 2 tion in Northern Eurôpe a8 a disease which occurs among peoples with the habit of eating raw herrings in Northern Europe centered on Holland. In Japan it was Keizo Asami (1964, 1965) who confirmed anisakiasis. From then, research on Anisakis.was rapidly commenced and it was found that it • has been far more prevalent in'our country where there is a strong traditional habit of eating raw fish than in Holland (Oshima, 1968). There are many parasitic diseases caused by fish or shellfish already known, such as heterophyasis including clonorchis sinensis and metagonimiasis which are caused by - the consumption of freshwater or semi-freshwater fish, and the danger of eating raw freshwater fish is well known. On the other hand, although it is acknowledged that extremely large numbers of young helminth exist in marine fish (Hoshina, 1963), only one kind of tapeworm (Diplogonoporus grandis, Japanese double cord tapeworm) was suspected of giving lesions to the human body. Tapeworms are parasitic on marine fish • or on Oncorhynchus keta or Oncorhynchus masou which originate 8
from fresh water. However, it has been reported that there is no harm in eating raw fish if they are the usual marine fish (Hoshina, 1963). Anisakis larvae, however, are parasitic on many marine fish, for example Gadus macrocephalus TILESIUS, Theragra chalcogramma (PALLAS), Enemplatopharus japonicus (HOUTTUYN), and even Ommastrephes sloani pacificus, and they cause larva migrans.. In this respect, anisakiasis has appeared as a parasitic disease which contradicts past common knowledge. •When the process of anisakiasis. research in Japan is surveyed up to the present, we whose aim is research on , the food hygiene of marine products realize the importance of this disease which is thought to result from eating raw fish (especially fish caught in the northern area centered on Hokkaido), considering it a problem significant for our own selves, and we fully realize the necessity to deal with it and consider this our mission. Although our knowledge and experience of anisakiasis is superficial, we were able to collect a hundred or so original books, references or newspaper articles with the assistance and cooperation of many people, including Mr. H. Ishikura locally in Hokkaido who is a pioneer in this field, T. Nishimura (University of Osaka City)., T. Yamaguchi (Hirosaki University), H. Yoshimura (Chiba University), • A. Kobayashi (National Institute of Health), J. Yamashita' • (Hokkaido University), personnel of Hokkaido University, 9
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Parasite Class, and many others. By knowing the progress and present position of anisakiasis research through these references, the authors are endeavouring to pursue fundamental studies in order to • devise food hygienic countermeasures against this disease. Bearing this in mind, the authors will describe in the following chapters the current understanding of anisakiasis, how to deal with it and study it food-hYgienically -, mainly by the references mentioned later, in arder to enable one to gain a general idea of anisakiasis. • 10 I. CLASSIFICATION AND MORPHOLOGY OF ANISAKIS 3
Si nificance of Anisakis Classification
The method of classification which is most generally accepted at present i8 the one by Yorke & Maplestone (1926), and according to this the taxonomical position of Anisakis is defined as follows: Phylum Nemathelminthes. Class Nematoda. Order Eunematoda. Superfamily Ascaroidea. Family Heterocheilidae. Subfamily Anisakinae. Genus Anisakis.
Including Anisakis, ten genera such as Contracaecum, Porrocaecum, Raphidascaris and Paranisakis, etc. have been established in the subfamily Anisakinae by recent research, but Hartwich (1957) modified this classification slightly by including Porrocaecum from the above-mentioned in the family Toxocaridae, Augusticaecum and Amplicaecum in the family Ascarididae and furthermore, he considèred the twO Raphidascaris and Paranisakis genera as Raphidascarinae, excluded them 11
from the subfamily Anisakinae and instead added Terranova, making them six genera in total. On the other hand, Mosgovoy (1951) proposed dividing the genus Anisakis into two subgenera, i.e. Anisakis and Skrjabinisakis, and he considered the main morphological difference between these two subgenera to be in the gastric region next tO the oesophagus. On this basis, he classified 18 species, that is, 13 species of subgenus Anisakis, 3 species of subgenus Skrjabinisakis, and 2 species of undetermined subgenus. These are shown in Table I-1 (Kagei, 1967). There is considerable dispute as to the independent charac- teristics in each species, for instance many people regard the three species of Anisakis . simplex, Anisakis dussumierii, Anisakis kukenthalii as one and the same species (Baylis, 1932; Lyster, 1940; Kagei 'et al., 1967), so it is presumed that the number of independent species will essentially be far less. In fact the nematodes of the genus Anisakis or subfamily Anisakinae which are found at present in the prin- cipal fish of our country are as follows, and these are further explained in Chapter II, Ecology Section. Anisakis simplex (Anisakis type I) A. Typica A. Physeteris (Anisakis type II) (Anisakis type III) r)
Terranova sp. Contracaecum sp. (Contracaecum type A) C. sp. (Contracaecum typc B) Raphidascaris Amplicaecum
Table I-1. Presently used Anisakis spenies. (Môsgovoy, 1951)
A nisakis , Dujardin, 1815') Mosgoroy, 111rd '
A. ■ A nisakis dussum ierii Beneden, 11.1101
Baylis, 1920
A. A. a lexandri II su et I Io eppl i, 1133
A. A. ratudontis Itaylis, 19119
A. ■ A.. ■liomedeae 1. instow, Miel • 11 a) lis, 1923
A. A, kokenthalii
A. A. insignis 1)iesing 1 ■.r2,1
A. A. i‘ Mo,govoy, 19-19
. A. A. . pa t agonira l.instov, 1*() IL.vli,192 3
A. A. robuirs ri Baylis, 1916 layli, 1 9;:i11
A. similis Baird, 11-11;3 Baylis, 192.9
A. • A. !,irnplex It odolphi, 11l ■9 • Ilayl s, 1 9.10
A. A. t rident at a K rois, 19:11-1
A. A. typira 1.-a;11 • Baylis, 19;10
A . Skrjahini sakis skarjal.ini Mosgovoy, 1,19
A. S. physet eris IlyIis, 111'.13
A. S.• .sdlupakori 1■10,govoy, • 1951
A. I cogians JI1t1 It"Nlaw snn, 1 , r19
A. 1 tursionis C rusr, 1941i 1 3
Morphology of Subfamily Anisakinae
(1) Adult
The principal morphological characteristics of adults of the subfamily Anisàkinae are as follows: There are three labia at the anterior extremity, which is a characteristiC of ascarids, and there ire differences between male and female. The posterior part'qf the oesophagus forms a ventriculus exhibiting a glandular structure. A single long and narrow renette cell can be observed in the left • side of the false coelom extending from the oesophagus to the intestinal canal of the worm body. However, there are some exceptions, one of which is the gastric region. There are • three genera, i.e. Dujardinia, Amplicaeéum, Angusticaecum which do not have this region. The second exception is the renette cell and Porrocaecum,
whose normal hosts are birds, lacks this cell. • , Therefore, it has been proposed that it will be appropriate to exclude these genera from Anisakinae and to . include them in Toxocaridae. The most prominent morphological differences among each genus of the subfamily Anisakinae are in the alimentary canal, especially the morphology of the gastric region and the presence or absence of a ventriculus 14
appendix or intestinal caecum, and apart from these the aperture of the renette cell is an important differentiating feature.
(2) Larva
It is also possible to distinguish larva by the characteristics of the alimentary canal in almost, the same manner as adults, but the distinguishing features are the aperture of the renette cell e presence or absence of a .oring tooth and of a mucron in the caudal region. A special question here is the morphological differences among the four genera of Anisakis, Contracaecum, Terranova and Porrocaecum which are suspected to have the ability to infect man. Such morphological characteristics were investigated by Inatomi et al. (1966) and Oshima (1967) with regard to four genera including Raphidascaris instead of Porrocaecum (Table 1-2) and by Kato et al. (1968) concerning six nematode genera of the subfamily Anisakinae which were detected in fish from Tokyo Central Market (Table I-3). Moreover, Otsuru (1969) demonstrated the morphological Characteristics of the anterior and posterior ends of nematode 'larvae of the subfamily Anisakinae by schematic diagrams as in Fig. 1-1.
1
IR (--D M -n• 11 r.V1 k:H b; et gl, ..t. Oesophageal Intestinal PI /.. 0") .. fig 5".. ; It. 'et, ql t l..!...c ,.„: •■ rt ei t2. PI i8( --II, appendix ri , , I 2 ) ( ) 4 , .q‘a.I :fi. by,41:tkAi csectun / t i ' i,g IaSIIP. 1 Ankskis 1 10 -36c, 0.3 -Mom - - 7.0m 17 -25 38 -50 18 4 I 60
Anisakis . 11 24 -33 05 -0.7 - - ? 233-37 50 - 72 ?
Terranova 33) 0.5 -0.7 - + ? ? ? ? ?
Raphidas-cari.1 8 -10 0.2 -•0.3 I- - 1.8 ? • 12 13 ?
Contrite:locum 15-17 0.2 -0.3 •t 1- 2 .0 ? 18 20 6
Table 1-2. Morphological differences in larval nematodes which infest fish and cuttlefish.
1. Name of genus. • 2. Length of larval body. 3. Width of larval body. 4. Thickness of cuticle. 5. Number of cells in the intestinal cana] (1 / 2). 6. Number of muscle-cell layers(1 / 4). 7. Muscle-fiber bundle. 8. Number of parallel arrangements .. 9. Number of radial muscle-fibre bundles.
0 firi. (i ',.. k, I ' czAnil cpAn "' Raphidascaris Contracaccum Porrocaecuni Terranova D -, - -4- (Boring tooth ) , ce m re _ (Inter labia t - CD D I. vi ki 7) (Ventricules ) -- -+ _ _ Ventriculus appendix: - R î * - - _ (Intestinal caccurn ) + + D fe. V 3Z' e _ ( Mucron ) + - + +
_ D e.te,5eh-lo)« _ _ + + --
28.4mre 30.3oo D. eitc,),,,è , 6.2 -17 .2rien 8.9 -15.0mul 30inntiq li. 30ntn;..1 '.1. (19-36) (24 - 5-3 - 9 0 l3-:P■ >2R'it.q)Il#lOS{i1t't- eD (Renette cell ) U(174 .)ti i%e
Table 1 - 3. Morphological characteristics of nematodes of the subfamily Anisakinae 16
1. Species. 2. Anisakis type I. 3. Anisakis type II. 4. Characteristics. 5. Boring tooth. 6. Inter labia. 7. Ventriculus. 8. Ventriculus appendix. 9. Intestinal caecum. 10. Mucron'in caudal regions. 11. Presence or absence of formation of reproductive organs. 12. Size of larval body. 13. Aperture of renette cell. 14. Long ventriculus. 15. Short ventriculus. 16. Labia. 17. About 30mm.
Ii Antsakis Ardsakis A lisakis Terranova Cont racaecum C on tracaecum II III A 1
Fig. I-1. Anterior and posterior ends of larval nematodes of the subfamily Anisakinae. 1 7
Shiraki (1969) investigated the morpholoical characteristic's in cross section of each nematode larva of the subfamily Anisakinae collected from marine fish. There is no difference in the cuticle among Anisakis types I, II, III and Terranova, but in Contracaecum type (A) larva small tubercles can be observed on both right and left sides and in type (B) the cuticle layer is thin. The lateral lines of Anisakis and Terranova larvae in a transverse cross section present what is termed a twinleaf-like .shape. In Anisakis types I and II, the two 'leaves' of the lateral line are separated -from each other, in type III and Terranova larvae they are always fused together, and in Contracaecum (A) and (B) the two 'leaves' are wider and their fusion tendency is stronger. No notable differences can be observed in the oesophagus cross section of each larva. The intestinal caecum of the Terranova larva can be observed in the cross section of the gastric region and that of Contracaecum types (A) and (B) larvae in the cross section of the posterior half of the oesophagus. The excretory gland in each larval body is contiguous to the left lateral line and tends to lean towards the sides. Apart from Contracaecum type (B) larvae, the excretory gland in each larva becomes enlarged about midway along its length, the enlarged part being between the gastric region and the anterior part of the mid-gut in type I, in types II, III and Terranova larvae it does not
18
enlarge until . the mid-gut region, and in Contrac.aecum type (A) it enlarges at the anterior end of the mid-gut. An opening for the excretory pore is present near the labia in each larva of Anisakis, Terranova, Contracaecum type (A), but in Contracaecum type (B) larvae it opens on the ventral surface slightly posterior to the nerve ring. Table 1-4 shows the dimensions of each part of nematode larvae of the subfamily Anisakinae which were taken from various species of marine fish.
AnisaMs Contracaceum Terranova
1 .(9) 11 ( 2) M M 09 A M B 03)
23.0-317 26 .7, 31.9 25.0, 26.3 16 .2 - 48.0 1b.-29.7 93.5 - 35.3 (28.6) . (32.6) (23 .4 I ( 28.1 )
B. W. 0.43-0.52 0.71, 0.71 0.97, 0.97 0.42-095 0.58-0.72 0.40-0.61 (0.49) ( 0.80 ) (0.64) (0 .51)
Oes. 1.76 2.3 1.80, 2.06 1.69, 1.75 1 .54 - 3.18 1.28-1.54 2.0 -2.7 • (2.1 ) ( 2.1 1 (1.38) ( 2.4 )
Vent. 1.08-1.46 0.62, 0.71 0.55, 0.52 0 .60 -1.84 0.29-0.38 (1.29) ( 1.22 ) (0.32) 0.35-1.17 052-1.02 1.8 -2.4 Int. Caec. / / / (0.69) 10.79) (2.1 )
Vent. App. 0.77-1.35 / / . / / 0.94)
Tail 6.10-0.13 0.23, 0.31 0.15. 0 .19 0.10-0.22 0.17-11.25 0.14-0.27 (0.12) 0.J4' 1 0.21) (0.20)
Table 1-4. Measured dimensions of each type of larva. * Number of larvae measured. Units are mm. Numbers in brackets are mean values. B.L.: Body length. B.W.: Body width. Oes.: Oesophagus length. Vent.: Ventriculus length. Int. Caéc.: Intestinal caecum léheth. Vent. App.: Ventriculus appendix length. Tail: Tail length. 1 9
The differentiation of these larvae is not always easy, but larvae of the genus Anisakis have neither ventriculus appendix nor intestinal caecum, Contracaecum larvae have both of these, and Terranova and Porrocaecum have intestinal caecum only. However, a distinction between the latter two is almost impassible. Moreover, it has been considered that since there is no development of an • intestinal caecum in • Porrocaecum larvae of body length less than 28 mm, it is impossible to distinguish them from Anisakis larvae by this feature (Baylis, 1944). However, with regard to this point, there have been some opposing assertions that even in larvae of shorter length (about 21 mm) an intestinal caecum can be observed (Berland, 1961; Poljansky, 1955; Scott, 1955; Kobayashi, 1967). Furthermore, there are some larvae of different genera which are considered able to enter the human body via marine fish and which are morphologically very similar ta the larvae of the genus Anisakis. One of the principal of these is Eustoma.. The final hosts of this genus are sharks and rays and it is possible to distinguish this genus from Anisakis larvae, because in the latter the excretory pare of the renette cell is near the labia and anal glands are present, whereas larvae of the genus Eustoma lack anal , 'glands and the excretory pore is near the nerve ring. 20
Morphology of the Genus Anisakis
(1) Adult
The characteristics of adults of the genus Anisakis are the various features.of the subfamily Anisakinae and in addition, the excretory gland aperture is situated near the . labia, they lack an intestinal caecum and a ventriculus appendix, they do not have interlabia but have dentigerous ridges and.their cross section exhibits two-leaf shaped or Y-shaped lateral lines. There is a morphological difference between the subgenera of Anisakis in the ventriculuS, the subgenus Anisakis having a long ventriculus and the subgenus Skrjabinisakis a short one. Morphological features which are points for differentiation among speCies are generally more conspicuàus. in males than females, especially the number . of post-anal papillae and the ratio of the length of the right and left spicules, etc.. In female adults, the position of the vulva is one of. the identification features, but this is not sufficient for differentiating from other species. Kagei et al. (1966) investigated dolphins, whose distribution density is the highest of all the marine mammals inhabiting our coast, and examined the adults of the genus Anisakis which were detected in the stomach. The result
21
was that they were mostly Anisakis simplex and Anisakis typica, and some immature Anisakis were also observed. Anisakis causing granulomatosis in our people are presumed to be mainly the two types A. simplex and • A. typica, accord- ing to Oshima (1966) and Kagei (1966). The • morphological features of these three adult species including It_lnyseteris are demonstrated by Kobayashi (1967, Table I-5). Moreover, there is a similar report in the investigation of nematodes of the genus Anisakis parasitic on marine mammals conducted earlier by Kagei et al. (1967, Table I-6).
TJ It le fr( ...".."-...-7 ' It / Ilr r 1 1 t Mlle • oll; ç''''' ■■ d 37 - 133 i 0.9 - 2.5 S '-"FILk '.;) ? rI 191 • : 4i t L i Gu
■ :`:. - 3 / 7 79-200 4 2.7 - 2.75 2 --,-- .: i E L a -'0.n) s ,-. 1 •f-'4. 2 4 3.7 A. aomplex 60-120 d 1.2 -2.5 1.6 -3.5 4;1.6 -2.6 ;IQ' I /2 O' I 95-140 4. 2.3 -3.5 61 (ii) : 1.5 I/ 2.06- 1 / 2.5
6+0.96 40 1 d 31-70' d 1.0 -1.5 S96 CD 1011 (a k 3. illi''Pfk 27 A. 4. 37-90 7 1.5 -2.0 , 5- I:. 'FLO 9 - 1171 G) 1 : 2-9
533 ( i k 0. 4 . I(10.35 C2) 30% d 70 -90 d 3.0 I , '1' ( ('' ) I II ' 3" ei ei 11 irw, e oe._ 2 / 9 -S, 80 -112 4,0 - 4 , "i . 3 'PAU ' 11.911) A.lerteri., ›; L 05 I / 4 - 1 / 5.5 d 3 -4 S 100 -145 1.0 4 1.1 4 3 , 1 CP, a .1,,,iii,le, q- 130 -200 3.5 -5.0 0,8 - ) . 5 671
Table I-5. Morphological comparison of three species of adult Anisakis. 1. Species. 2. Body length(mm). 3. Body width(mm). 4. Gastric region(mm). 5. Sigmoid. 6. long lengthwise. 7. Straight. 8. Longitudinally and laterally almost equal. 9. Number of post-anal papillae. • 10. Seven pairs (One pair of them combined papilla).
22
11. 6 - 8 pairs. 12. 6 pairs. 13. 10 pairs. 14. 9 - 11 pairs. 15. 6 pairs (One pair of them combined papilla). 16. 4 pairs. 17. 6 pairs. 18. Length of right and left spicules (mm) or ratio.
- 19. Both right and left 1.68. 20. The two are not equal, left 2.4 - 3.7, right 1.6 - 2.6. 21. Left 3, right 0.96. 22. Left 0.4, right 0 -.35. 23. The two are*almost equal in length, 0.33 - 0.5. 24. The two are almost equally short. 25. Position of vulva from anterior end. 26. Approximately 1/2. .27. Approximately in the middle.