DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Greenwich

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR GREENWICH Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions January 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for Greenwich. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) ©Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, ©Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 NEXT STEPS 29 APPENDIX A Draft Recommendations for Greenwich (August 1999) 31 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Greenwich is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 25 January 2000 Dear Secretary of State On 9 February 1999 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Greenwich under the Local Government Act 1992. We published our draft recommendations in August 1999 and undertook a ten-week period of consultation. We have now prepared our final recommendations in the light of the consultation. We have substantially confirmed our draft recommendations, although some modifications have been made (see paragraphs 148- 149) in the light of further evidence. This report sets out our final recommendations for changes to electoral arrangements in Greenwich. We recommend that Greenwich Borough Council should be served by 51 councillors representing 17 wards, and that changes should be made to ward boundaries in order to improve electoral equality, having regard to the statutory criteria. We note that you have now set out in the White Paper Modern Local Government – In Touch with the People (Cm 4014, HMSO), legislative proposals for a number of changes to local authority electoral arrangements. However, until such time as that new legislation is in place we are obliged to conduct our work in accordance with current legislation, and to continue our current approach to periodic electoral reviews. I would like to thank members and officers of the Borough Council and other local people who have contributed to the review. Their co-operation and assistance have been very much appreciated by Commissioners and staff. Yours sincerely PROFESSOR MALCOLM GRANT Chairman LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND v vi LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Commission began a review of Greenwich on per councillor would vary by no more than 9 February 1999. We published our draft 10 per cent from the borough average. recommendations for electoral arrangements on 3 ● This level of electoral equality is forecast to August 1999, after which we undertook a ten-week improve further, with the number of electors period of consultation. per councillor in all wards expected to vary by no more than 1 per cent from the average ● This report summarises the representations for the borough in 2004. we received during consultation on our draft recommendations, and offers our final recommendations to the Secretary of State. All further correspondence on these recommendations and the matters discussed We found that the existing electoral arrangements in this report should be addressed to the provide unequal representation of electors in Secretary of State for the Environment, Greenwich: Transport and the Regions, who will not make an order implementing the Commission’s ● in six of the 36 wards the number of electors recommendations before 7 March 2000: represented by each councillor varies by more than 10 per cent from the average for The Secretary of State the borough; Department of the Environment, ● by 2004 electoral equality shows no overall Transport and the Regions improvement, with the number of electors Local Government Sponsorship Division per councillor forecast to vary by more than Eland House 10 per cent from the average in 12 wards, Bressenden Place and by more than 20 per cent in four wards. London SW1E 5DU Our main final recommendations for future electoral arrangements (Figures 1 and 2 and paragraphs 148-149) are that: ● Greenwich Borough Council should be served by 51 councillors, compared to 62 at present; ● there should be 17 wards, 19 fewer than at present, which would involve changes to the boundaries of all of the existing wards. These recommendations seek to ensure that the number of electors represented by each borough councillor is as nearly as possible the same, having regard to local circumstances. ● In 15 of the 17 wards the number of electors LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND vii Figure 1: The Commission’s Final Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas (existing wards) councillors 1 Abbey Wood 3 Abbey Wood ward; Eynsham ward (part) 2 Blackheath Parks 3 Blackheath ward (part); Middle Park ward (part); Sutcliffe ward (part); Tarn ward (part) 3 Blackheath 3 Blackheath ward (part); Ferrier ward (part); Vanbrugh ward Westcombe (part) 4 Charlton 3 Charlton ward (part); Hornfair ward (part); Rectory Field ward (part); Woolwich Common ward (part) 5 Coldharbour 3 Coldharbour ward; New Eltham ward (part); Tarn ward (part) 6 Eltham North 3 Deansfield ward; Eltham Park ward (part); Sherard ward (part); Well Hall ward (part) 7 Eltham South 3 Avery Hill ward; Eltham Park ward (part); Middle Park ward (part); New Eltham ward (part); Tarn ward (part); Palace ward 8 Eltham West 3 Ferrier ward (part); Kidbrooke ward (part); Sherard ward (part); Sutcliffe ward (part); Well Hall ward (part) 9 Greenwich Town 3 St Alfege ward (part); Vanbrugh ward (part); West ward 10 Griffin 3 Arsenal ward (part); Burrage ward (part); Glyndon ward (part); Lakedale ward (part); Plumstead Common ward (part) 11 Kidbrooke with 3 Hornfair ward (part); Kidbrooke ward (part); Rectory Field Hornfair (part); Well Hall ward (part) 12 Peninsula 3 Charlton ward (part); St Alfege ward (part); Trafalgar ward 13 Plumstead 3 Eynsham ward (part); Glyndon ward (part); Lakedale ward (part); Slade ward (part); St Nicholas Ward; Thamesmead Moorings ward (part) 14 Shooters Hill 3 Herbert ward (part); Plumstead Common ward (part); Shrewsbury ward (part); Slade ward (part); Woolwich Common ward (part) 15 Thamesmead 3 Glyndon ward (part); Thamesmead Moorings ward (part) Moorings 16 Woolwich Common 3 Arsenal ward (part); Burrage ward (part); Herbert ward (part); Nightingale ward; Plumstead Common ward (part); St Mary’s ward (part); Woolwich Common ward (part) 17 Woolwich Riverside 3 Arsenal ward (part); Charlton ward (part); St Mary’s ward (part); Woolwich Common ward (part) Note: Map 2 and the large map in the back of the report illustrate the proposed wards outlined above. viii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Figure 2: The Commission’s Final Recommendations for Greenwich Ward name Number Electorate Number Variance Electorate Number Variance of (1999) of electors from (2004) of electors from councillors per councillor average per councillor average %% 1 Abbey Wood 3 9,535 3,178 7 9,550 3,183 0 2 Blackheath Parks 3 9,569 3,190 7 9,561 3,187 0 3 Blackheath 3 9,696 3,232 8 9,689 3,230 1 Westcombe 4 Charlton 3 9,581 3,194 7 9,579 3,193 0 5 Coldharbour 3 9,564 3,188 7 9,564 3,188 0 6 Eltham North 3 9,595 3,198 7 9,605 3,202 0 7 Eltham South 3 9,551 3,184 0 9,548 3,183 0 8 Eltham West 3 9,245 3,082 3 9,515 3,172 0 9 Greenwich Town 3 8,189 2,730 0 9,612 3,204 1 10 Griffin 3 9,058 3,019 1 9,488 3,163 -1 11 Kidbrooke with 3 8,571 2,857 -4 9,565 3,188 0 Hornfair 12 Peninsula 3 7,151 2,384 -20 9,426 3,142 -1 13 Plumstead 3 9,469 3,156 6 9,472 3,157 -1 14 Shooters Hill 3 9,536 3,179 7 9,545 3,182 0 15 Thamesmead 3 6,295 2,098 -30 9,700 3,233 1 Moorings 16 Woolwich Common 3 9,531 3,177 6 9,544 3,181 0 17 Woolwich Riverside 3 8,031 2,677 -10 9,604 3,201 0 Totals 51 152,167 --162,567 -- Averages --2,984 --3,188 - Source: Electorate figures are based on information provided by Greenwich Borough Council. Note: The ‘variance from average’ column shows by how far, in percentage terms, the number of electors per councillor varies from the average for the borough. The minus symbol (-) denotes a lower than average number of electors. Figures have been rounded to the nearest whole number. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ix x LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND 1. INTRODUCTION 1 This report contains our final recommendations better position to judge what council size and ward on the electoral arrangements for the London configuration are most likely to secure effective and borough of Greenwich. convenient local government in their areas, while allowing proper reflection of the identities and 2 In broad terms, the objective of this periodic interests of local communities. electoral review of Greenwich is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor 7 We are not prescriptive on council size.
Recommended publications
  • The 190 Casualties of Hms Jervis Bay

    The 190 Casualties of Hms Jervis Bay

    THE 190 CASUALTIES OF HMS JERVIS BAY I am hoping that our information is as accurate as it can be at this moment in time. Please be reassured that any errors pointed out to us and proved to be correct, will be put right in due course. We like to get facts and figures correct, though mistakes can obviously happen, unfortunately. ***Places of birth will either be the actual place or the registered borough or area. CREWMAN RANK NUMBER BIRTH PLACE & YEAR FORCE AGE STATUS NATIONALITY ABBOTT Coder P/LD/X 4844 Streatham, London RNVR 20 Single British John Milton UK / 1920 ***Parents were John Edward Abbott & Bessie Abbott ( nee Whitehouse - married 1913 - Wandsworth, London) Address at start of WW2 listed as Streatham, London. Remembered on the Portsmouth, Hants Memorial. ALLDRIDGE Petty Officer C/JX 133016 Rochester, Kent RN 32 Married British Harry UK / 1908 ***Parents were Charles James Alldridge & Georgina Alice Alldridge ( nee Anderson - married 1895 - Poplar, London) ***Wife was Ruth Margaret Alldridge ( nee Quilter - married 1934 - West Ham, London) Address at the start of WW2 listed as Gillingham, Kent. Chatham Memorial. ANDERSON Seaman C/X 10533 Thrumster,Caithness, RNR 27 Married British James UK/ 1913 (Scotland) ***Parents were Donald Anderson & Martha Foster Anderson ( nee McKellar - married ?) ***Wife was Ellen Anderson ( nee Miller - married 1939 - Wick, Caithness) Address at start of WW2 listed as Old Schoolhouse, Thrumster, Scotland. Remembered on the HMS Jervis Bay plaque in Wick, Caithness. Chatham Memorial. AVERY Seaman C/JX 181440 Trinity Bay, NFL, RN 22 Single Newfoundlander Wilson UK/Canada - 1918 (UK, then Canada) ***Parents were Alfred John Avery & Sarah Jane Avery ( nee Langor - married 10th June, 1918 - NFL, Canada) Address at start of WW2 listed as Trinity Bay, Newfoundland.
  • Woolwich to Falconwood

    Woolwich to Falconwood

    Capital Ring section 1 page 1 CAPITAL RING Section 1 of 15 Woolwich to Falconwood Section start: Woolwich foot tunnel Nearest station to start: Woolwich Arsenal (DLR or Rail) Section finish: Falconwood Nearest station to finish: Falconwood (Rail) Section distance 6.2 miles plus 1.0 miles of station links Total = 7.2 miles (11.6 km) Introduction This is one of the longer and most attractive sections of the Capital Ring. It has great contrasts, rising from the River Thames to Oxleas Meadow, one of the highest points in inner London. The route is mainly level but there are some steep slopes and three long flights of steps, two of which have sign-posted detours. There is a mixture of surfaced paths, a little pavement, rough grass, and un-surfaced tracks. There are many bus stops along the way, so you can break your walk. Did you know? With many branches and There are six cafés along the route. Where the walk leaves the Thames loops, the Green Chain there are two cafés to your right in Thames-side Studios. The Thames walk stretches from the River Thames to Barrier boasts the 'View café, whilst in Charlton Park you find the 'Old Nunhead Cemetery, Cottage' café to your right when facing Charlton House. Severndroog spanning fields, parks and woodlands. As Castle has a Tea Room on the ground floor and the latter part of the walk indicated on the maps, offers the Oxleas Wood café with its fine hilltop views. much of this section of the Capital Ring follows some of the branches of The route is partially shared with the Thames Path and considerably with the Green Chain.
  • Residential Update

    Residential Update

    Residential update UK Residential Research | January 2018 South East London has benefitted from a significant facelift in recent years. A number of regeneration projects, including the redevelopment of ex-council estates, has not only transformed the local area, but has attracted in other developers. More affordable pricing compared with many other locations in London has also played its part. The prospects for South East London are bright, with plenty of residential developments raising the bar even further whilst also providing a more diverse choice for residents. Regeneration catalyst Pricing attraction Facelift boosts outlook South East London is a hive of residential Pricing has been critical in the residential The outlook for South East London is development activity. Almost 5,000 revolution in South East London. also bright. new private residential units are under Indeed pricing is so competitive relative While several of the major regeneration construction. There are also over 29,000 to many other parts of the capital, projects are completed or nearly private units in the planning pipeline or especially compared with north of the river, completed there are still others to come. unbuilt in existing developments, making it has meant that the residential product For example, Convoys Wharf has the it one of London’s most active residential developed has appealed to both residents potential to deliver around 3,500 homes development regions. within the area as well as people from and British Land plan to develop a similar Large regeneration projects are playing further afield. number at Canada Water. a key role in the delivery of much needed The competitively-priced Lewisham is But given the facelift that has already housing but are also vital in the uprating a prime example of where people have taken place and the enhanced perception and gentrification of many parts of moved within South East London to a more of South East London as a desirable and South East London.

  • London 2012 Venues Guide

    Olympic Delivery Authority London 2012 venues factfi le July 2012 Venuesguide Contents Introduction 05 Permanent non-competition Horse Guards Parade 58 Setting new standards 84 facilities 32 Hyde Park 59 Accessibility 86 Olympic Park venues 06 Art in the Park 34 Lord’s Cricket Ground 60 Diversity 87 Olympic Park 08 Connections 36 The Mall 61 Businesses 88 Olympic Park by numbers 10 Energy Centre 38 North Greenwich Arena 62 Funding 90 Olympic Park map 12 Legacy 92 International Broadcast The Royal Artillery Aquatics Centre 14 Centre/Main Press Centre Barracks 63 Sustainability 94 (IBC/MPC) Complex 40 Basketball Arena 16 Wembley Arena 64 Workforce 96 BMX Track 18 Olympic and Wembley Stadium 65 Venue contractors 98 Copper Box 20 Paralympic Village 42 Wimbledon 66 Eton Manor 22 Parklands 44 Media contacts 103 Olympic Stadium 24 Primary Substation 46 Out of London venues 68 Riverbank Arena 26 Pumping Station 47 Map of out of Velodrome 28 Transport 48 London venues 70 Water Polo Arena 30 Box Hill 72 London venues 50 Brands Hatch 73 Map of London venues 52 Eton Dorney 74 Earls Court 54 Regional Football stadia 76 ExCeL 55 Hadleigh Farm 78 Greenwich Park 56 Lee Valley White Hampton Court Palace 57 Water Centre 80 Weymouth and Portland 82 2 3 Introduction Everyone seems to have their Londoners or fi rst-time favourite bit of London – visitors – to the Olympic whether that is a place they Park, the centrepiece of a know well or a centuries-old transformed corner of our building they have only ever capital. Built on sporting seen on television.
  • AUTUMN 1996 Obltuarles

    AUTUMN 1996 Obltuarles

    Bulletinof The HeatherSociety /Vg 4a', #1X.sJ".,^-...,," p",ri,"JijJig:: -'ouun"Junnuo"ru"^, &ffi* * Vol.5 No.9 Autumnl996 DIARY OF DVENTS 1996/7 1996 25 October North East Group AGM 26/27 Irorefiber H€athercompetition RHS Vlncent Squarc 27 November council Meeung RHSVincent Square 1997 l5 January closing Date for Informationfor the aulbiin la/tg February HeatherCompetition RHSVincent Square 19 February council Meeting RHS Vincent Square 5 April Souih West Croup Talk & Compeutton 5 April Southem Grcup Talk & Competiilon 20 July Southem Group BodiamNursery, Kent l6 August southem Croup HeathlandVlslt 5/8 S€ptember Annual Conference 20 September Southem Group RHSWisley TTIEHEATHER SOCIETY BULLETIN VOL. 5. No.9- AUIIIMN 1996 A Registeredchanty No. 261407 Edltor: Daphne Evsett, ores*res NuFery, Bringsty, worcest€r wR6 5TA. Telephone/Fd: ola85 482206 Cot€r illustEuon call@ Vulso'1s 'whne ME" by Brtta Johannsoo A .ontingcntol rwlze Blitish rcnbeft attefln?nthc 1996Nonh Ane,icanHeathzl socizt!confeftnrz.hcathis!@r in calilotnia.Thzcoqmnce, andthz ttut uhichplzeded it,wrcadelight,duein o stu\\I!,vy to thetren'mdous eturgy ad enthusias,nofthe NAHS Menben.A uonadfLl tine uvs hanW alt.A fuIt ftPon of thc tnP uilt aPWt in th?nei Besrle yow sinsu,ill fnn youout! It setnsda @rygoad idea at thztine toa&id haoing to uftr bottbsof catilomia ui e (intededt'ol gilt , arouttdth. USA,b! buyingthan at Oddbiisin Worczsteron ow uar honelnn Ileatbou what ue diln't knau wasthat all thebottbs wouw bear bbels stating'Sryci'lly inrytted by Oddbi,{ ! Pstst!Hauelouhzafith. storyol h't' ourl)ice-PrcsdenL Albert ltlian, h'd hisryiarus stobnin Ewela?Atlt I couAhaLv sr,vrn thtt it unsr bltck-t'1ttiathat tookhin andJean off to tht aipotl Solry,dy lipsale sealpn- yot uill iust hwe to askhin aboutit.
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital SE18 4QH Common and Park Do These Walks to Help Meet Your Daily Walking Target and Improve Your Wellbeing

    Queen Elizabeth Hospital SE18 4QH Common and Park Do These Walks to Help Meet Your Daily Walking Target and Improve Your Wellbeing

    Wellbeing at Work Queen Elizabeth Hospital SE18 4QH Common and Park Do these walks to help meet your daily walking target and improve your wellbeing LOCAL AREA The Queen Elizabeth Hospital is almost entirely surrounded by green space, though much of it is closed to the public (Ministry of Defence establishments) or fenced off (a cemetery and a sports ground just to the West of the hospital). However, Woolwich Common faces the main entrance and the varied Horn Fair Park is tucked away very close. Charlton Park and Mary Wilson Parks are also not far away. There are good opportunities for enjoyable lunchtime and after-work walks. In fact two of London’s great long distance walking routes, the Green Chain and the Capital Ring pass close to the Queen Elizabeth and you can have a taster on our walk. DESCRIPTION A pleasant walk around Woolwich Common and a visit to the varied Horn Fair Park with its sunken rose garden. The walk shares two short sections with both the Green Chain and the Capital Ring. Those seeking a shorter walk can choose to do either the Common or the Horn Fair Park halves of the walk, instead of both. The May trees are splendid on the Common in Spring, as are the roses in Horn Fair Park in June. Wear sensible footwear and choose a dry day for a walk on the Common. TOTAL DISTANCE 2.1 miles TIME 40 minutes PACES 4200 paces An alternative shorter route is offered (1.4 miles/26 minutes/2750 paces). Wellbeing at Work Queen Elizabeth Hospital SE18 4QH Common and Park 1 Start at the main entrance to Queen 3 Continue on for several hundred metres as the path swings Elizabeth Hospital: around to the right.
  • City Villages: More Homes, Better Communities, IPPR

    City Villages: More Homes, Better Communities, IPPR

    CITY VILLAGES MORE HOMES, BETTER COMMUNITIES March 2015 © IPPR 2015 Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This book was first published in March 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions expressed in this collection are those of the authors only. CITY VILLAGES More homes, better communities Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies March 2015 ABOUT THE EDITORS Andrew Adonis is chair of trustees of IPPR and a former Labour cabinet minister. Bill Davies is a research fellow at IPPR North. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editors would like to thank Peabody for generously supporting the project, with particular thanks to Stephen Howlett, who is also a contributor. The editors would also like to thank the Oak Foundation for their generous and long-standing support for IPPR’s programme of housing work.
  • Woolwich Common Estate MUGA - Photo Route

    Woolwich Common Estate MUGA - Photo Route

    Woolwich Common Estate MUGA - Photo Route Woolwich Common Estate MUGA Address: Woolwich Common Estate MUGA, Woolwich, London SE18 4DB Transport: Woolwich Arsenal - South Eastern & DLR; 18-minute walk from Woolwich Arsenal Station Buses 122 and 469 take you to Nightingale Place and then a 5- minute walk from there Access: This site has a ramp for access. Our volunteers will be available near the station and site for support. For more information: Visit www.tfl.gov.uk to plan your journey to Woolwich Arsenal station. Woolwich Common Estate MUGA - Photo Route Directions from Woolwich Arsenal Station Exit Woolwich arsenal station. A ramp is available to the left. Next, turn left onto Woolwich New Road Walk towards Tesco Extra Keep Tesco Extra to your right. Next at the fork, keep left on to Woolwich New Road. At the junction, continue straight, along the left side pavement. Woolwich Common Estate MUGA - Photo Route When you reach this junction, use the pedestrian crossing and cross to the other side of the road. Turn left onto Nightingale Place. Very soon you will see a bus stop on the other side of the road and on your left there is a path going between the buildings Walk down this path in between the buildings Woolwich Common Estate MUGA - Photo Route The MUGA will be on your right. Directions from Bus Stop J, Nightingale Place Get off the bus at Stop G, Nightingale Place and turn left. At this junction follow the pavement round to the right onto Nightingale Place and keep straight. Woolwich Common Estate MUGA - Photo Route Very soon you will see a bus stop on the other side of the road and on your left there is a path going between the buildings Walk down this path in between the buildings The MUGA will be on your right.
  • Summer Olympic Games Offical Report London 2012

    Summer Olympic Games Offical Report London 2012

    The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Limited London 2012 London 2012 Olympic Games Official Report Volume 3 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 SECTION 1: BUILDING A WORLD-CLASS ORGANISATION 13 Introduction 14 Governance, structure and legal support 15 Finance 16 Building the team 18 Workforce Planning and Operations 19 Games Maker volunteers 20 Diversity and inclusion 23 Embedding sustainability 25 Commercial 28 − Procurement 28 − Commercial negotiations and the domestic partner programme 29 − Licensing and retail 30 − Ticketing 31 Brand management and protection 34 SECTION 2: STAGING A GREAT GAMES 35 Introduction 36 Venues 40 − Venue Planning 41 − Venue Development 42 Sport 44 − Sport Competition 44 − Sport Presentation 46 − NOC Services 47 Anti-Doping 48 Medical Services 49 Villages 50 Look 53 Motto 54 Spectator experience 56 Event Services 57 Technology 58 Broadcast 61 Press Operations 62 Games Services 65 − Arrivals and Departures 65 − Accommodation 65 − Logistics 66 − Catering, Cleaning and Waste 67 Health and Safety 68 International Relations 69 Readiness 70 Test events 71 The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Limited 2 SECTION 3: EVERYONE’s GamES 74 Introduction 75 Communications 78 − Public Relations and Media 80 − Government Relations 81 − Community Relations 82 − Editorial Services 83 − Web and New Media 84 Brand and Marketing 86 − Games emblems 86 − Research and relationships 87 − Mascots 88 Nations and Regions 89 Inspire 90 Education 91 Ceremonies 93 Olympic
  • Why We Have 'Mixed Communities' Policies and Some Difficulties In

    Why We Have 'Mixed Communities' Policies and Some Difficulties In

    Notes for Haringey Housing and Regeneration Scrutiny Panel Dr Jane Lewis London Metropolitan University April 3rd 2017 Dr Jane Lewis • Dr Jane Lewis is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology and Social Policy at London Metropolitan University. She has worked previously as a lecturer in urban regeneration and in geography as well as in urban regeneration and economic development posts in local government in London. Jane has wide experience teaching at under-graduate and post-graduate levels with specific expertise in urban inequalities; globalisation and global inequalities; housing and urban regeneration policy and is course leader of the professional doctorate programme in working lives and of masters’ courses in urban regeneration and sustainable cities dating back to 2005.Jane has a research background in cities and in urban inequalities, urban regeneration policy and economic and labour market conditions and change. aims • 1. Invited following presentation Haringey Housing Forum on concerns relating to council estate regeneration schemes in London in name of mixed communities polices • 2. Senior Lecturer Social Policy at LMU (attached note) • 3. Terms of reference of Scrutiny Panel focus on 1and 2 – relating to rehousing of council tenants in HDV redevelopments and to 7 – equalities implications Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV) and Northumberland Park • ‘development projects’ proposed for the first phase of the HDV include Northumberland Park Regeneration Area – includes 4 estates, Northumberland Park estate largest • Northumberland Park
  • South East London Green Chain Plus Area Framework in 2007, Substantial Progress Has Been Made in the Development of the Open Space Network in the Area

    South East London Green Chain Plus Area Framework in 2007, Substantial Progress Has Been Made in the Development of the Open Space Network in the Area

    All South East London Green London Chain Plus Green Area Framework Grid 6 Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 8 Area Description 9 Strategic Context 10 Vision 12 Objectives 14 Opportunities 16 Project Identification 18 Project Update 20 Clusters 22 Projects Map 24 Rolling Projects List 28 Phase Two Early Delivery 30 Project Details 50 Forward Strategy 52 Gap Analysis 53 Recommendations 56 Appendices 56 Baseline Description 58 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA06 Links 60 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA06 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www. london.gov.uk/publication/all-london-green-grid-spg .
  • Nithdale Road Plumstead SE18 Guide Price £539,995 Freehold Bedrooms: 3 Receptions: 2 Bathrooms: 1

    Nithdale Road Plumstead SE18 Guide Price £539,995 Freehold Bedrooms: 3 Receptions: 2 Bathrooms: 1

    Nithdale Road Plumstead SE18 Guide Price £539,995 Freehold Bedrooms: 3 Receptions: 2 Bathrooms: 1 Situated on the lovely Shooters Hill Slopes, in an elevated position on an elegant, tree lined road close to Shrewsbury Park, this property has been exquisitely renovated by its current owners and combines beautiful, bespoke design, with a wealth of period features. EPC Rating D. Chain Free. These details available online at johnpayne.com/P193078 Arrange a viewing on 020 8858 6101 Situated on the lovely Shooters Hill Slopes, in an elevated Bedroom 1 position on an elegant, tree lined road close to Shrewsbury 15'9 x 10'6 The master bedroom is exquisitely designed with Park, this property has been exquisitely renovated by its the utmost comfort in mind. There are three Everest double current owners and combines beautiful, bespoke design, glazed sash windows to the front. with fitted Hillary wooden with a wealth of period features. It benefits from a large, high shutters, painted floorboards, a cast iron fireplace with -specification, extended kitchen, four piece bathroom, painted surround and slate hearth, large built in wardrobes downstairs cloakroom/utility room, Everest double glazing and alcove units. and a summerhouse/office. The property is conveniently located within the catchment area for great primary schools Bedroom 2 (Christchurch, Plumcroft), close to improved transport links 12'7 x 10'4 The second bedroom is a good size featuring a and with access to London City Airport. The imminent large, double glazed window, with shutters, overlooking the completion of the crossrail, meaning that Central London garden, flooding the room with plenty of natural light.