Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 167: Little Benton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 167: Little Benton Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 167: Little Benton 1. OVERALL CLASSIFICATION: © Cities Revealed 2005 Now a residential area with significant open space,although all late 20th © Crown Copyright Reserved 2008 century development on former fields and industrial site (converted Wills factory); mostly medium sized detached houses with some apartment blocks; suburban image but weak sense of place due to seemingly ad-hoc layout, choice of materials, and random pastiche use of various traditional details/features; low vegetation impact (other than grass). 2. Quality rating - Weak (7/19) Character strength - Strong (9/9) Area of Local Townscape Signficiance (ALTS) - No 3. Predominant land uses within area: Residential; Open Space Predominant Ages - 1980 - 2000 General Condition - good Refurbished - unaltered 4. Predominant adjacent land uses: Residential; Office/Business with some Open Space Predominant Ages - 1980 - 2000 with some 1920 - 1960 General Condition - average/good Refurbished - unaltered 5. Access networks: Distributor; Residential 6. Landmarks and views within the area: Positive - Former Wills Factory building; Meridian Way Sports Ground and Play Area. Neutral - None Negative - None Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 167: Little Benton 7. Landmarks and views outside the area: Positive - DSS/ Business Park to north (Tyneview Park); Henderson Hall/ Coach Lane Campus. Neutral - Main East Coast railway line Negative - None 8. Urban Form: Grain - Medium Built Scale - Medium Sense of Place - Weak Image - Suburban Notes: Grain virtually non-existent - answer based on plot sizes 9. Main Residential building types: - Detached with some Block Main Non- Residential building types: - None 10. Local detail and character: - Ad-hoc layout of private houses; mass-market appearance in poor quality pastiche of various traditional styles; varied mix of brick colours, with red clay tiles. 11. Heritage Value: - Weak 12. Character: Movement - Dead/Quiet Colour - Muted/Colourful Safety - Comfortable Stimulus - Bland Consistency of character - Uniform 13. Visual impact of vegetation: Trees - Low Shrubs - Low/Medium Hedges - None/Low Grass - Medium/High Other - None Streets with Street Trees - None Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 167: Little Benton 14. Ecology: - Average/Strong UDP Wildlife Corridor - Coxlodge wagonway; East Coast railway 15. Topography: General groundform - Flat Aspect - None Local Topographical Name - None 16. Open spaces and other unbuilt areas: Main types of Open Space - Countryside with some Sportsfield; Gardens; Incidental Open Space Significance of Public Open Space - Medium/High Significance of Private Open Space - Medium/High Degree of linking of Main Open Spaces - Medium/High 17. Additional information: Main landmark is 1930’s former Wills Cigarette Factory - refurbished to apartments in landscaped grounds. Large part of the area is more or less derelict agricultural land not yet built upon. Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 167: Little Benton: Area Guidance Strengths / opportunities Do’s Don’ts Comments Coxlodge Wagonway Allow views out to adjacent wooded Loss of street trees New development to recreational route areas have strong identity, reflect materials of Plantation woodland belts Strengthen identity of estate adjacent areas entrance road: tree planting, street Mature trees furniture, highway surfacing Refer to TPO’s 6/94 & 4/90 Edge of city location Strengthen identity of area with tree planting, signage, retain views Haydon Grange housing to open space, enhance quality of estate incidental open space Former Wills Factory Retain and enhance quality of setting building Retain and enhance quality of building Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 168: Cochrane Park 1. OVERALL CLASSIFICATION: © Cities Revealed 2005 Suburban residential area on gentle south-facing slope, comprising mid 20th © Crown Copyright Reserved 2008 century private semis of typical bay-windowed style;artificial stone garden walling; uniform and bland although average/good condition; vegetation impact low except for shrubs within gardens. 2. Quality rating - Neutral (11/19) Character strength - Strong (8/9) Area of Local Townscape Signficiance (ALTS) - No 3. Predominant land uses within area: Residential Predominant Ages - 1920 - 1960 General Condition - average/good Refurbished - unaltered 4. Predominant adjacent land uses: Open Space with some Residential; Retail Predominant Ages - 1920 - 1960 with some 1800 - 1920; 1980 - 2000 General Condition - average/good Refurbished - unaltered 5. Access networks: Distributor; Residential; Cyclepath 6. Landmarks and views within the area: Positive - Benton Road junction shopping parade; Benfield Road junction shopping parade; Lochside PH. Neutral - Coast Road Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 168: Cochrane Park Negative - None 7. Landmarks and views outside the area: Positive - Views south to Walker/ Wallsend, including shipyard cranes; Wills building; Byker and Heaton Cemetery; Henderson Hall; Former Smiths Crisps factory (now Crosslings). Neutral - None Negative - None 8. Urban Form: Grain - Fine/Medium Built Scale - Medium Sense of Place - Average Image - Suburban 9. Main Residential building types: - Semi-Detached Main Non- Residential building types: - None 10. Local detail and character: - 1930’s private semis, brick built, mix of slate and clay roofing; mix of square and round bay windows; imitation stone garden walling. 11. Heritage Value: - Average 12. Character: Movement - Quiet Colour - Muted Safety - Safe Stimulus - Bland Consistency of character - Uniform 13. Visual impact of vegetation: Trees - Low Shrubs - Medium Hedges - Low Grass - None/Low Other - None Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 168: Cochrane Park Streets with Street Trees - Coast Road; Red Hall Drive. 14. Ecology: - Weak/Average UDP Wildlife Corridor - Coxlodge wagonway to north 15. Topography: General groundform - Gentle Slope Aspect - South Local Topographical Name - None 16. Open spaces and other unbuilt areas: Main types of Open Space - Gardens Significance of Public Open Space - None Significance of Private Open Space - Low Degree of linking of Main Open Spaces - Low 17. Additional information: Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 168: Cochrane Park: Area Guidance Strengths / opportunities Do’s Don’ts Comments Local shops – Benton Strong feature to retain and enhance­­ Lane, Benfield Road shopping parade at junctions­­ Street trees 1930’s semi’s Retain setting of semi’s with space Extend into loft by realigning between unit roof Retain double bay windows and low walls to frontages Tree planting­­­ Consider planting trees within the highway in key locations/ street junctions Consider tree planting to strengthen southern boundary of estate against Coast Road­ ­­­­­ ­ Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 169: North Heaton 1. OVERALL CLASSIFICATION: © Cities Revealed 2005 Quiet private suburban estate of primarily 1930s bungalows (brick/render, © Crown Copyright Reserved 2008 some variety in detailing including bays) with some standard brick semis (actually 4 flats) and some plainer 1940’s-50’s houses; brick garden walls/ piers; average/good condition, but low vegetation impact; also includes a school and a TA site. 2. Quality rating - Weak (9/19) Character strength - Strong (8/9) Area of Local Townscape Signficiance (ALTS) - No 3. Predominant land uses within area: Residential with School Predominant Ages - 1920 - 1960 General Condition - average/good Refurbished - unaltered 4. Predominant adjacent land uses: Residential with some Retail; Open Space Predominant Ages - 1800 - 1920; 1920 - 1960 General Condition - average/good Refurbished - unaltered 5. Access networks: Distributor; Residential 6. Landmarks and views within the area: Positive - Ravenswood School; Benfield Road shops. Neutral - TA Centre; Coast Road. Negative - None Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 169: North Heaton 7. Landmarks and views outside the area: Positive - Crosslings building; Railway & Coast Road bridge; Coast Road/ Chillingham Road junction; Chillingham Road shops. Neutral - None Negative - None 8. Urban Form: Grain - Fine/Medium Built Scale - Small Sense of Place - Average Image - Suburban 9. Main Residential building types: - Bungalow with some Semi-Detached Main Non- Residential building types: - School 10. Local detail and character: - 1930’s bungalows, brick/ render finish, clay roof, various bays; also 1930’s semis (actually 4 flats), brick, slate roof; a few plainer 1940’s/ 50’s additions; brick garden walls with piers. 11. Heritage Value: - Weak 12. Character: Movement - Quiet Colour - Muted Safety - Safe Stimulus - Bland Consistency of character - Uniform 13. Visual impact of vegetation: Trees - Low Shrubs - Low/Medium Hedges - Low Grass - Low Other - None Streets with Street Trees - None Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 169: North Heaton 14. Ecology: - Weak/Average UDP Wildlife Corridor - Railway and adjoining open space 15. Topography: General groundform - Gentle Slope Aspect - East Local Topographical Name - None 16. Open spaces and other unbuilt areas: Main types of Open Space - Gardens with some Sportsfield; Incidental Open Space Significance of Public Open Space - Low Significance of Private Open Space - Medium/High Degree of linking of Main Open Spaces - Medium 17. Additional information: Newcastle Character Assessment: Urban Areas Area M 169: North
Recommended publications
  • Constituency Ward District Reference Polling Place Returning Officer Comments
    Constituency Ward District Reference Polling Place Returning Officer Comments Central Arthurs Hill A01 A1 Stanton Street Community Lounge, Stanton Street, NE4 5LH Propose no change to polling district or polling place Moorside Primary School, Beaconsfield Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 Central Arthurs Hill A02 A2 Propose no change to polling district or polling place 5AW Central Arthurs Hill A03 A3 Spital Tongues Community Centre, Morpeth Street, NE2 4AS Propose no change to polling district or polling place Westgate Baptist Church, 366 Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 Central Arthurs Hill A04 A4 Propose no change to polling district or polling place 6NX Proposed no change to polling district, however it is recommended that the Benwell and Broadwood Primary School Denton Burn Library, 713 West Road, Newcastle use of Broadwood Primary School is discontinued due to safeguarding Central B01 B1 Scotswood upon Tyne, NE15 7QQ issues and it is proposed to use Denton Burn Library instead. This building was used to good effect for the PCC elections earlier this year. Benwell and Central B02 B2 Denton Burn Methodist Church, 615-621 West Road, NE15 7ER Propose no change to polling district or polling place Scotswood Benwell and Central B03 B3 Broadmead Way Community Church, 90 Broadmead Way, NE15 6TS Propose no change to polling district or polling place Scotswood Benwell and Central B04 B4 Sunnybank Centre, 14 Sunnybank Avenue, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 6SD Propose no change to polling district or polling place Scotswood Benwell and Atkinson
    [Show full text]
  • 7-446 the London Gazette, November 23, 1900. "(5
    7-446 THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 23, 1900. In Parliament.—Session 1901. the termination of Tramway No. 4, passing Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads. thence in a north-easterly direction to .(Construction of tramways and tramroads in Bridge-row, and thence in a south-easterly the couniy of Northumberland to be worked direction along the site of the Coxlodge by electrical power; Compulsory purchase of waggon way (disused), and along York- Y lands and easements; Powers to break open, street, Wallsend, and terminating at the alter, and interfere with streets and roads, junction of that street with High-street and to lay down, place, and erect electric West. - lines, posts," and other works-in, upon, or over (6) An alteration, by lowering the levels,, of . streets and roads; Bye-laws; Tolls, rates, Station-road, and of its junctions with Vine- and charges; Agreements with local autho- street, Holly-street, and Atkinson-terrace-, rities, companies, and others; Working and all hi the Urban District of Wall send, -the .traffic agreements; Provisions as to purchase said alteration commencing at a point about' by .local'authorities-; Incorporation of'Acts, 55 yards, measured in a south-easterly direc- . and other provisions.) . tion, from the centre of the bridge carrying OTICE is hereby given that application is the Tynemouth branch of the North Eastern N intended to be made to Parliament in-the Railway over that ?'oad, and terminating at ensuing Session for leave to bring in a Bill for a point about 88 yards, measured in a an Act for all or some of the following pur- north-westerly direction, from the centre of poses:— the said bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Street Disabled Bays
    On-Street Disabled Bays Post Code of Days Hours Street Location restrictions restrictions Ward (not apply apply individual bay) Acorn Road (x2) • 1 x Outside Hardware shop North NE2 2DJ All All • 1 x Close to Jesmond junction with St. George’s Terrace Akenside Hill • Under Tyne NE1 3XP All All Westgate Bridge Back Shields Road • Near junction NE6 1XQ All All Byker with Flora Street Bath Lane • Near junction NE4 5SP All All Westgate with Stowell Street Benton Bank • Near junction South NE2 1HB All All with Jesmond Jesmond Road Benton Road Service Road (x2) • 2 x north of NE7 7DR All All Dene junction with Benton Road Benwell Lane (x2) • 1 x Near junction with NE15 Benwell & Rushie Avenue All All 6NG Scotswood • 1 x Near junction with Pendower Way Bigg Market • Near junction NE1 1UW All All Westgate with Pudding Chare Post Code of Days Hours Street Location restrictions restrictions Ward (not apply apply individual bay) Breamish Street • Near junction NE1 2DZ All All Ouseburn with Crawhall Road Brighton Grove (x3) • 2 – Opposite side of road to NE4 5NT All All Wingrove Cathedral • Near junction with Barrack Road Broad Chare 8.00am – • Near junction NE1 3HE All Ouseburn 6.30pm with Quayside Broomfield Road (x2) West • 2 x near NE3 4HH All All Gosforth junction with North Avenue Brunel Terrace • South of De NE4 7NL All All Elswick Grey Street Burdon Terrace South NE2 3AE All All • Outside Church Jesmond Cambridge Street • Opposite NE4 7HL All All Elswick junction with Mather Road Carliol Square (east section) NE1 6UF All All Westgate • Outside
    [Show full text]
  • The Park Keeper
    The Park Keeper 1 ‘Most of us remember the park keeper of the past. More often than not a man, uniformed, close to retirement age, and – in the mind’s eye at least – carrying a pointed stick for collecting litter. It is almost impossible to find such an individual ...over the last twenty years or so, these individuals have disappeared from our parks and in many circumstances their role has not been replaced.’ [Nick Burton1] CONTENTS training as key factors in any parks rebirth. Despite a consensus that the old-fashioned park keeper and his Overview 2 authoritarian ‘keep off the grass’ image were out of place A note on nomenclature 4 in the 21st century, the matter of his disappearance crept back constantly in discussions.The press have published The work of the park keeper 5 articles4, 5, 6 highlighting the need for safer public open Park keepers and gardening skills 6 spaces, and in particular for a rebirth of the park keeper’s role. The provision of park-keeping services 7 English Heritage, as the government’s advisor on the Uniforms 8 historic environment, has joined forces with other agencies Wages and status 9 to research the skills shortage in public parks.These efforts Staffing levels at London parks 10 have contributed to the government’s ‘Cleaner, Safer, Greener’ agenda,7 with its emphasis on tackling crime and The park keeper and the community 12 safety, vandalism and graffiti, litter, dog fouling and related issues, and on broader targets such as the enhancement of children’s access to culture and sport in our parks The demise of the park keeper 13 and green spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle Conservative Federation
    Newcastle Conservative Federation Newcastle City Council Electoral Review – Draft Boundaries Submission August 2016 This is a response from the Newcastle Conservative Federation to the Local Government Boundary Commission’s draft proposals for electoral ward boundaries within Newcastle upon Tyne. It draws on the views expressed to us by our members and local residents. We have chosen not to submit a full alternative response to the Commission’s proposals but would like to offer some thoughts on some specific ward proposals where we have received feedback from our members or residents. Newcastle Conservatives responded to the original consultation on warding arrangements by expressing its view that the number of councillors should reduce from the current level of seventy-eight. Our original proposal was to reduce the number of councillors to fifty-two representing fifty-two single member wards. However we acknowledged that were the Council and the Commission to continue to divide the number of councillors by three then the reduction should be to fifty-four councillors with three members each representing one of eighteen wards. We set out our reasons for this in detail which we have attached as an appendix to this submission. The strong arguments in favour of a reduction appeared initially to have been accepted by the Commission, however the Commission then changed its mind after protests from the City Council. We remain disappointed that the Commission chose to cave in to pressure from Labour councillors and declined to take this opportunity to reduce the cost of politics in Newcastle and provide the City with an adequate level of representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncertain Prospects Public Parks in the New Age of Austerity a Short Report by the Gardens Trust
    Uncertain Prospects Public parks in the new age of austerity A short report by The Gardens Trust Uncertain Prospects Public parks in the new age of austerity A short report by The Gardens Trust written by Katy Layton-Jones 2016 Preface This report has been written in response to increasing alarm about the effect of budget cuts on councils’ capacity to maintain their public parks. That alarm has been most recently embodied in a House of Commons Select Committee inquiry into the future of public parks, held in the autumn of 2016. The Gardens Trust was formed in 2015 from the merger of the Garden History Society and the Association of Gardens Trusts. It has inherited the GHS role as a national amenity society and a statutory consultee on planning applications affecting parks and gardens on the national Register. It is also the umbrella group for the network of 36 county gardens trusts in England and is affiliated to the Welsh Historic Gardens Trust. In 2016 the Gardens Trust published The Planning System in England and the Protection of Historic Parks and Gardens: Guidance for Local Planning Authorities. The report was written by Dr Katy Layton-Jones, an independent historical consultant. In 2005 she was engaged as a Research Associate on the Liverpool Parks and Open Spaces project, a collaboration between Liverpool City Council, the University of Liverpool, and English Heritage. She has since been commissioned to research parks and parks policy for a number of organisations including Historic England and local authorities. She has researched and published widely on the subject of public parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident's Submissions to the Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Council Electoral Review
    Local resident’s submissions to the Newcastle-upon-Tyne Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Pr9hvq A ) Tr) Mishka Mayers Review Assistant LGBCE 0330 500 1251 From: Karon Alderman Sent: 18 August 2016 11:37 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Newcastle ward boundary changes Dear Boundary Commission I believe that the Benton Lodge Estate, where I live, is very much part of the Dene community and should stay part of Dene Ward. Please reverse the decision on the Dene adn Manor Park ward boundariues decision and choose Newcastle Council’s Option 1 for area C as this is more in line with our communities and services. Thank you, Karon Alderman 1 ‐‐ Jonathan Ashby Review Assistant LGBCE From: Sent: 19 August 2016 13:07 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Draft recommendations for Newcastle City Council Good Morning, I have attached an extract from your document concerning the above issue which is a little confusing - apologies if you are already aware of this.. As I reside in North Walbottle I have always thought that we have little in common with the existing Newburn ward and fully support the creation of a new Chapel ward and North Walbottle's inclusion within it. However, on reading the document, there is an apparent contradiction (which I assume is a simple slip of the pen/keyboard) - I have highlighted the error in yellow, and which should read simply Walbottle and not North Walbottle? Thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: James and Wainwright Bellhouse Ltd., Cotton Spinners
    CHAPTER 6 JAMES AND WAINWRIGHT BELLHOUSE LTD. COTTON SPINNERS The business venture started by David Bellhouse (1764 – 1840) that seems least related to the rest is cotton spinning. This business was passed to his sons, James (1796 – 1874) and Wainwright Bellhouse (1800 – 1885), about a decade before the father’s death. By 1833, David Bellhouse had ceased to list himself as a cotton spinner in the Manchester directories. Wain- wright Bellhouse first appeared in the Manchester directories in 1832 with his occupation given as cotton spinner; James Bellhouse followed in 1836. The firm was know as Messrs. Bellhouse by 18311 and as James and Wainwright (J. & W.) Bellhouse by 1833.2 Advertisement for the Medlock New Mill3 129 The traditional date for the start of J. & W. Bellhouse is 1792.4 However, this is the year in which David Bellhouse senior took up residence in Faulkner Street and began to work inde- pendently as a joiner and builder, not the year the spinning business started. David Bellhouse built the original mill, associated with the firm known as the Medlock New Mill, in 1806 and so the beginning of the firm should be dated from that year. The mill was just outside the boundary of the Township of Manchester as defined in 1800.5 It was bounded by the Medlock River and by Pritchard, York and Charles Streets in Chorlton on Medlock or Chorlton Row. The mill was situated directly across the Medlock River from all the other Bellhouse enterprises, which were in Hunt or Whitworth Street. David Bellhouse senior built a second mill at this location in 1836.6 Sometime before 1851 a third mill was added.
    [Show full text]
  • MARRIAGE CERTIFICATES © NDFHS Page 1
    MARRIAGE CERTIFICATES No GROOMSURNAME Groomforename BRIDESURNAME Brideforename D M Y PLACE 588 ABBOT William HADAWAY Ann 25 Jul 1869 Tynemouth 935 ABBOTT Edwin NESS Sarah Jane 20 JUL 1882 Wallsend Parrish Church Northumbrland ADAMS Thomas BORTON Mary 16 OCT 1849 Coughton Northampton 556 ADAMSON James Frederick TATE Annabell 6 Oct 1861 Tynemouth 655 ADAMSON Robert GRAHAM Hannah 23 OCT 1847 Darlington Co Durham 581 ADAMSON William BENSON Hannah 24 Feb 1847 Whitehaven Cumberland ADDISON James WILSON Jane Elizabeth 23 JUL 1871 Carlisle, Cumberland 694 ADDY Frederick BELL Jane 26 DEC 1922 Barnsley Yorks 1456 AFFLECK James LUCKLEY Ann 1 APR 1839 Newcastle upon Tyne 1457 AGNEW William KIRKPATRICK Mary 30 MAY 1887 Newcastle upon Tyne 751 AINGER David TURNER Eliza 28 FEB 1870 Essex 704 AIR Thomas MCKENZIE Ann 24 MAY 1871 Belford NBL 936 AISTON John ELLIOTT Esther 26 FEB 1881 Sunderland 244 AITCHISON John COCKBURN Jane 22 Aug 1865 Utd Pres Ch Newcastle ALBION Henry Edward SCOTT Margaret 6 APR 1884 St Mark Millfield Durham ALDER John Cowens WRIGHT Ann 24 JUN 1856 Newcastle /Tyne 1160 ALDERSON Joseph Henry ANDERSON Eliza 22 JUN 1897 Heworth Co Durham ALLABURTON John GREEN Jane 24 DEC 1842 St. Giles ,Durham City 1505 ALLAN Edward PERCY Sarah 17 JUL 1854 St. Nicholas, Newcastle on Tyne 1390 ALLEN Alexander Bowman WANDLESS Jessie 10 JUL 1943 Darlington Co Durham 992 ALLEN Peter F THOMPSON Sheila 18 MAY 1957 Newcastle upon Tyne 1161 ALLEN Thomas HIGGINS Annie 4 OCT 1887 South Shields 158 ALLISON John JACKSON Jane Ann 31 Jul 1859 Colliery, Catchgate,
    [Show full text]
  • Indicative Layout and Capacity Study of Proposed Housing Release Sites HRS1: North of Mount Lane, Springwell Village
    Core Strategy and Development Plan Indicative Layout and Capacity Study of Proposed Housing Release Sites HRS1: North of Mount Lane, Springwell Village Location SHLAA site: 407C Impact on the Green Belt: • Located on the western edge of the existing residential area of Housing release policy: HRS1 There is a moderate impact on the Green Belt if this Springwell Village site is to be removed. The site is on the urban fringe of • Lies immediately to the rear of Wordsworth Crescent and Beech Grove Owner/developer: Hellens the village and would have limited impact on urban • Lies on elevated farmland to the north of Mount Lane sprawl and countryside encroachment. Site size: 3.20 ha • Existing residential communities to the north and east • Arable land to the south and west • Close proximity to the centre of Springwell Village (which includes shops and a primary school) • Good access to the main bus route Key constraints • Bowes Railway is a Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) and is located to the west of the site • Springwell Ponds Local Wildlife Site (LWS) is situated to the west of the site which includes protected species. Wildlife will move through the site • The site is relatively level however the land beyond slopes southward toward Mount Lane • Development on the southern edge of the site will be subject to long distant views • Vehicle and pedestrian access to the site is restricted to one access point • Highway junction improvements will be required at Mount Lane • Development would have to ensure that additional infrastructure such as
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Access Guide
    Metrolink Access Guide 2020 How to use this guide Metrolink is designed to be accessible to as many people as possible. Many of its features have been designed to improve access to public transport and make it as easy as possible for our passengers to use. We have produced this guide to help those with specific/additional accessibility requirements to get the best out of the system. For the latest Coronavirus transport information please visit tfgm.com The guide is in four sections. Section 1 General information and background Metrolink accessibility ..................................................................... Page 3 About Metrolink .............................................................................. Page 3 The Equality Act 2010 and Metrolink ............................................. Page 4 Section 2 Planning your Metrolink journey Before you travel ............................................................................. Page 5 Parking for Blue Badge holders ....................................................... Page 6 Metrolink Park and Ride facilities .................................................... Page 6 Metrolink network Park & Ride map ............................................... Page 7 Bicycles and trams ........................................................................... Page 8 Access to Metrolink stops ................................................................ Page 9 Section 3 Journey advice Buying a ticket – ticket machines .................................................... Page
    [Show full text]
  • Green Spaces . . . Using Planning
    Green spaces . using planning Assessing local needs and standards Green spaces…your spaces Background paper: Green Spaces…using planning PARKS AND GREEN SPACES STRATEGY BACKGROUND PAPER GREEN SPACES…USING PLANNING: ASSESSING LOCAL NEEDS AND STANDARDS _____________________________________________________________ Green Spaces Strategy Team April 2004 City Design, Neighbourhood Services Newcastle City Council CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 3 National and Local Standards 4 Density and housing types in Newcastle 3 Newcastle’s people 6 Assessing Newcastle's Green Space Needs 7 Is Newcastle short of green space? 8 Identifying “surplus” green space 9 Recommendations Annexe A Current Local, Core Cities and Beacon Council standards ( Quantity of green space, distances to green spaces and quality) Annexe B English Nature's Accessible Natural Green Space standards Annexe C Sample Areas Analysis; Newcastle's house type, density and open space provision. Annexe D Surveys and research Annexe E References and acknowledgements 2 1 Introduction 1.1 We need to consider whether we need standards for green spaces in Newcastle. What sort of standards, and how to apply them. 1.2 Without standards there is no baseline against which provision can be measured. It is difficult to make a case against a proposal to build on or change the use of existing open space or a case for open space to be included in a development scheme if there are no clear and agreed standards. 1.3 Standards are used to define how much open space is needed, particularly when planning new developments. Local authority planning and leisure departments have developed standards of provision and these have been enshrined in policy and guidance documents.
    [Show full text]