DOCSLIB.ORG

Big-Time Insights from a Tiny Bird Fossil COMMENTARY Daniel J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Big-Time Insights from a Tiny Bird Fossil COMMENTARY Daniel J COMMENTARY Big-time insights from a tiny bird fossil COMMENTARY Daniel J. Fielda,1 Birds are among the most diverse and widely distrib- exceeds Waimanu in age, and appears to be an early uted groups of vertebrate animals. There are well over stem group representative of a living group of birds 10,000 recognized species alive today, occupying called mousebirds (sometimes also known as colies). virtually every subaerial ecosystem (1). The amazing Tsidiiyazhi’s age implies not only that the lineage breadth of extant bird diversity is manifested in dizzy- leading to mousebirds had diverged from its closest ing varieties of forms, colors, and lifestyles, ranging living relatives by 62.5 Ma but also that a host of other from iridescent, hovering, nectar-feeding humming- deep divergences within the neoavian tree of life had birds to nocturnal, flightless, worm-eating kiwis. How, taken place by this early time as well. If the neoavian when, and why has this spectacular diversity arisen? radiation was stimulated by the mass extinction of The only direct evidence informing such questions can nonavian dinosaurs as has been suggested (6, 7, 9–11), be obtained from the fossil record of the modern bird its pace must have been amazingly rapid. radiation, but the early fossil record of modern birds is The evolutionary insights yielded by Tsidiiyazhi do exceedingly sparse. In PNAS, Ksepka et al. (2) help to not end there, however; this discovery also enhances improve our understanding of this pivotal interval of bird our understanding of the biogeographic history of evolutionary history by reporting the discovery of a new mousebirds and is part of a broader evolutionary pic- fossil bird filling an important temporal gap. ture. Living mousebirds comprise a small group of The fossil, Tsidiiyazhi abini (derived from the Na- only six species, endemic to sub-Saharan Africa (12). vajo Dine ´ Bizaad language for “little morning bird”)is Mousebirds are classified in their own taxonomic or- indeed little, because the specimen was collected der, Coliiformes, owing to the fact that they share no within a 25-cm × 25-cm grid from fossil beds in the particularly close affinities with other groups of living San Juan basin of New Mexico. In fact, Tsidiiyazhi’s birds. Although their phylogenetic position within the broad evolutionary implications are far from obvious broader bird tree of life was debated for decades, we from a casual glance at its broken and incomplete skel- now believe that they represent an early offshoot of eton. However, thanks to careful and detailed anatomi- the lineage ultimately giving rise to groups like king- cal work, Ksepka et al. (2) demonstrate that this tiny fossil fishers, woodpeckers, and hornbills (6, 7). Considering bird punches well above its weight in helping to eluci- the geographic distribution of living mousebirds, it is date the nature and timing of the modern bird radiation. easy to assume that the group simply arose in Africa Attempts to correlate the geological time scale with and never left. However, the discovery of Tsidiiyazhi in important events early in modern bird evolutionary the southwestern United States illustrates that the past history are often controversial (3–5). Still, recent studies distribution of the total group of mousebirds was likely integrating the fossil record and molecular clock tech- more widespread than the current distribution of the niques suggest an extremely rapid radiation of the major group’s living representatives. Indeed, an impressive avian subclade Neoaves in the aftermath of the Creta- diversity of early stem group mousebirds is known ceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) extinction that wiped out the from the Paleogene of North America and Europe (13). nonavian dinosaurs, 66 million years ago (Ma) (6, 7). Mousebirds are in good company, because many living Today, Neoaves comprises over 90% of living bird bird groups with restricted modern-day distributions, diversity, but bird fossils from the first few million years such as the seriemas of today’s South American plains, after the extinction are exceptionally rare. In fact, the hummingbirds from the New World, and Amazonian earliest known definitive representative of Neoaves hoatzins, have early fossil representatives known from (the giant extinct penguin, Waimanu manneringi, from very different regions of the world (14). Such observa- New Zealand) is ∼60.5 Ma (8). What happened in neoa- tions plainly illustrate the value of fossils to historical bio- vian evolution between the K–Pg extinction event and geography: Only the direct evidence of the fossil record the earliest record of Waimanu?At∼62.5 Ma, Tsidiiyazhi can definitively show us where groups of birds were aMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom Author contributions: D.J.F. wrote the paper. The author declares no conflict of interest. See companion article 10.1073/pnas.1700188114. 1Email: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1710941114 PNAS Early Edition | 1of3 AB8.0 Fig. 1. (A) Extant speckled mousebird (Colius striatus), which is widespread across sub-Saharan Africa. (B) Simplified representation of the time-scaled interrelationships among living bird groups, following a recent phylogenomic study (6). The root of the tree is estimated at roughly 73 Ma, and the dotted circle represents the approximate position of the K–Pg mass extinction event at ∼66 Ma. The approximate age (∼62.5 Ma) and phylogenetic position of T. abini, the new fossil described by Ksepka et al. (2), is denoted by the small black arrow, and the phylogenetic position of living mousebirds (Aves: Coliidae) is represented by the large black arrow. formerly distributed, because avian biogeography is vastly more Despite the largely uniform structure of living mousebirds, the complex than can be understood on the basis of modern geo- fossil record reveals a surprising menagerie of highly divergent graphic distributions alone. stem group forms, suggesting a considerable amount of ecolog- Future efforts to refine our understanding of how modern birds ical experimentation throughout their evolutionary history. For obtained their characteristic geographic distributions will there- example, Chascacocolius cacicirostris, from the early Eocene of fore need to accommodate the presence of stem mousebirds in Germany, exhibited bizarrely enlarged posteriorly directed exten- the early Paleocene of North America (15). This kind of integrative sions of its lower jaws, thought to assist in prying into tough fruits biogeographic work may have implications for our ability to pre- (17) or probing in the ground for invertebrates (18). In contrast, the dict the future, because in determining the extent to which climatic Oligocene Oligocolius, also known from German sediments, changes throughout Cenozoic Earth history were responsible for exhibited a short, deep, superficially parrot-like beak and may driving such dramatic biogeographic changes, we may gain insight have fed on tougher food items as evinced by a jumble of large into how bird biogeography may evolve in response to our planet’s seeds found in the presumed area of its crop (19). current climatic trajectory. Why should a bird as tiny as Tsidiiyazhi make such a big pale- Of course, the new fossil discovery also provides us with ontological impact? How can the early Cenozoic fossil record of important insights into the evolution of modern mousebird modern birds be sufficiently patchy that a single bird fossil can tell biology. Living mousebirds are distinctive (Fig. 1A), because they us so much? It is true that Tsidiiyazhi represents only a single data are smallish, arboreal birds with short conical bills, very long tails, point, and future refinements of the avian evolutionary time scale, feathered crests on their heads, and specialized toes that can be models of biogeographic change, and anatomical evolution must directed backward to assist with perching (16). Ksepka et al. (2) await additional fossil discoveries. confirm the presence of this flexible foot condition in Tsidiiyazhi, However, the question of why the early Cenozoic avian fossil illustrating that this specialization evolved early in mousebird record is so poor is one that is in need of attention. Detailed evolutionary history. Surprisingly, however, they illustrate that paleontological surveys of fossil avifaunas from the latest Creta- such “semizygodactyly,” although present in several living neoa- ceous and the earliest Paleocene suggest that Mesozoic bird-like vian families, including owls and the Madagascan endemic forms, including close relatives of living birds like enantiornithines courol, likely evolved independently in these different groups. (“Mesozoic opposite birds”) and hesperornithines (toothed ma- This inference is only supported in analyses that incorporate fossil rine forms) flourished up to the very latest stages of the Mesozoic information, providing another example of the potential for fos- before falling victim to the asteroid-induced K–Pg mass extinc- sils to reveal unforeseen complexity in the evolutionary history tion (10). The extinction event likely would have decimated pop- of birds. ulation sizes among the handful of surviving bird lineages, and 2of3 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1710941114 Field limited resources in the extinction’s aftermath may even have both their geological age and their phylogenetic position. One driven transient selection for reduced body size (3). The dual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor How They Arise, Modify and Vanish
    Fascinating Life Sciences Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor Bird Species How They Arise, Modify and Vanish Fascinating Life Sciences This interdisciplinary series brings together the most essential and captivating topics in the life sciences. They range from the plant sciences to zoology, from the microbiome to macrobiome, and from basic biology to biotechnology. The series not only highlights fascinating research; it also discusses major challenges associated with the life sciences and related disciplines and outlines future research directions. Individual volumes provide in-depth information, are richly illustrated with photographs, illustrations, and maps, and feature suggestions for further reading or glossaries where appropriate. Interested researchers in all areas of the life sciences, as well as biology enthusiasts, will find the series’ interdisciplinary focus and highly readable volumes especially appealing. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15408 Dieter Thomas Tietze Editor Bird Species How They Arise, Modify and Vanish Editor Dieter Thomas Tietze Natural History Museum Basel Basel, Switzerland ISSN 2509-6745 ISSN 2509-6753 (electronic) Fascinating Life Sciences ISBN 978-3-319-91688-0 ISBN 978-3-319-91689-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91689-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018948152 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Birds Classification System Tinamiformes
    6.1.2011 Classification system • Subclass: Neornites (modern birds) – Superorder: Paleognathae, Neognathae Modern Birds • Paleognathae – two orders, 49 species • Struthioniformes—ostriches, emus, kiwis, and allies • Tinamiformes—tinamous Ing. Jakub Hlava Department of Zoology and Fisheries CULS Tinamiformes • flightless • Dwarf Tinamou • consists of about 47 species in 9 genera • Dwarf Tinamou ‐ 43 g (1.5 oz) and 20 cm (7.9 in) • Gray Tinamou ‐ 2.3 kg (5.1 lb) 53 cm (21 in) • small fruits and seeds, leaves, larvae, worms, and mollusks • Gray Tinamou 1 6.1.2011 Struthioniformes Struthioniformes • large, flightless birds • Ostrich • most of them now extinct • Cassowary • chicks • Emu • adults more omnivorous or insectivorous • • adults are primarily vegetarian (digestive tracts) Kiwi • Emus have a more omnivorous diet, including insects and other small animals • kiwis eat earthworms, insects, and other similar creatures Neognathae Galloanserae • comprises 27 orders • Anseriformes ‐ waterfowl (150) • 10,000 species • Galliformes ‐ wildfowl/landfowl (250+) • Superorder Galloanserae (fowl) • Superorder Neoaves (higher neognaths) 2 6.1.2011 Anseriformes (screamers) Anatidae (dablling ducks) • includes ducks, geese and swans • South America • cosmopolitan distribution • Small group • domestication • Large, bulky • hunted animals‐ food and recreation • Small head, large feet • biggest genus (40‐50sp.) ‐ Anas Anas shoveler • mallards (wild ducks) • pintails • shlhovelers • wigeons • teals northern pintail wigeon male (Eurasian) 3 6.1.2011 Tadorninae‐
    [Show full text]
  • AOU Classification Committee – North and Middle America
    AOU Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2016-C No. Page Title 01 02 Change the English name of Alauda arvensis to Eurasian Skylark 02 06 Recognize Lilian’s Meadowlark Sturnella lilianae as a separate species from S. magna 03 20 Change the English name of Euplectes franciscanus to Northern Red Bishop 04 25 Transfer Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis to Antigone 05 29 Add Rufous-necked Wood-Rail Aramides axillaris to the U.S. list 06 31 Revise our higher-level linear sequence as follows: (a) Move Strigiformes to precede Trogoniformes; (b) Move Accipitriformes to precede Strigiformes; (c) Move Gaviiformes to precede Procellariiformes; (d) Move Eurypygiformes and Phaethontiformes to precede Gaviiformes; (e) Reverse the linear sequence of Podicipediformes and Phoenicopteriformes; (f) Move Pterocliformes and Columbiformes to follow Podicipediformes; (g) Move Cuculiformes, Caprimulgiformes, and Apodiformes to follow Columbiformes; and (h) Move Charadriiformes and Gruiformes to precede Eurypygiformes 07 45 Transfer Neocrex to Mustelirallus 08 48 (a) Split Ardenna from Puffinus, and (b) Revise the linear sequence of species of Ardenna 09 51 Separate Cathartiformes from Accipitriformes 10 58 Recognize Colibri cyanotus as a separate species from C. thalassinus 11 61 Change the English name “Brush-Finch” to “Brushfinch” 12 62 Change the English name of Ramphastos ambiguus 13 63 Split Plain Wren Cantorchilus modestus into three species 14 71 Recognize the genus Cercomacroides (Thamnophilidae) 15 74 Split Oceanodroma cheimomnestes and O. socorroensis from Leach’s Storm- Petrel O. leucorhoa 2016-C-1 N&MA Classification Committee p. 453 Change the English name of Alauda arvensis to Eurasian Skylark There are a dizzying number of larks (Alaudidae) worldwide and a first-time visitor to Africa or Mongolia might confront 10 or more species across several genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbalizing Phylogenomic Conflict: Representation of Node Congruence Across Competing Reconstructions of the Neoavian Explosion
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/233973; this version posted December 14, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Tempe, December 12, 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE (1st submission) Verbalizing phylogenomic conflict: Representation of node congruence across competing reconstructions of the neoavian explosion Nico M. Franz1*, Lukas J. Musher2, Joseph W. Brown3, Shizhuo Yu4, Bertram Ludäscher5 1 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America 2 Richard Gilder Graduate School and Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America 3 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom 4 Department of Computer Science, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, United States of America 5 School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America * Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Short title: Verbalizing phylogenomic conflict Abstract Phylogenomic research is accelerating the publication of landmark studies that aim to resolve deep divergences of major organismal groups. Meanwhile, systems for identifying and integrating the novel products of phylogenomic inference – such as newly supported clade concepts – have not kept pace. However, the ability to verbalize both node concept congruence and conflict across multiple, (in effect) simultaneously endorsed phylogenomic hypotheses, is a critical prerequisite for building synthetic data environments for biological systematics, thereby also benefitting other domains impacted by these (conflicting) inferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Parrots 3 Other Major Groups of Parrots 16
    ONE What are the Parrots and Where Did They Come From? The Evolutionary History of the Parrots CONTENTS The Marvelous Diversity of Parrots 3 Other Major Groups of Parrots 16 Reconstructing Evolutionary History 5 Box 1. Ancient DNA Reveals the Evolutionary Relationships of the Fossils, Bones, and Genes 5 Carolina Parakeet 19 The Evolution of Parrots 8 How and When the Parrots Diversified 25 Parrots’ Ancestors and Closest Some Parrot Enigmas 29 Relatives 8 What Is a Budgerigar? 29 The Most Primitive Parrot 13 How Have Different Body Shapes Evolved in The Most Basal Clade of Parrots 15 the Parrots? 32 THE MARVELOUS DIVERSITY OF PARROTS The parrots are one of the most marvelously diverse groups of birds in the world. They daz- zle the beholder with every color in the rainbow (figure 3). They range in size from tiny pygmy parrots weighing just over 10 grams to giant macaws weighing over a kilogram. They consume a wide variety of foods, including fruit, seeds, nectar, insects, and in a few cases, flesh. They produce large repertoires of sounds, ranging from grating squawks to cheery whistles to, more rarely, long melodious songs. They inhabit a broad array of habitats, from lowland tropical rainforest to high-altitude tundra to desert scrubland to urban jungle. They range over every continent but Antarctica, and inhabit some of the most far-flung islands on the planet. They include some of the most endangered species on Earth and some of the most rapidly expanding and aggressive invaders of human-altered landscapes. Increasingly, research into the lives of wild parrots is revealing that they exhibit a corresponding variety of mating systems, communication signals, social organizations, mental capacities, and life spans.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbiformes ~ Pterocliformes ~ Mesitornithiformes
    Birds of the World part 2 Galloanseres, Neoaves: Columbea NEOGNATHAE (the rest of the birds!): Galloanseres • ORDER ANSERIFORMES – waterfowl • Family Anhimidae – screamers (3 species) • Family Anseranatidae – magpie goose (1 species) • Family Anatidae – ducks, geese, and swans (173 species) • ORDER GALLIFORMES – landfowl • Family Megapodiidae – megapodes (21 species) • Family Cracidae – chachalacas, curassows, and guans (55 species) • Family Numididae – guineafowl (6 species) • Family Odontophoridae – New World quail (34 species) • Family Phasianidae – pheasants and allies (183 species) NEOGNATHAE : Neoaves (the rest of the birds!): COLUMBEA • ORDER PODICIPEDIFORMES – Family Podicipedidae – grebes (23 species) • ORDER PHOENICOPTERIFORMES – Family Phoenicopteridae – flamingos (6 species) • ORDER COLUMBIFORMES – Family Columbidae – pigeons and doves (334 species) • ORDER PTEROCLIDIFORMES – Family Pteroclididae – sandgrouse (16 species) • ORDER MESITORNITHIFORMES – Family Mesitornithidae – mesites (3 species) NEOGNATHAE : Galloanseres • ORDER ANSERIFORMES – waterfowl • Family Anhimidae – screamers (3 species) • Family Anseranatidae – magpie goose (1 species) • Family Anatidae – ducks, geese, and swans (173 species) • ORDER GALLIFORMES – landfowl • Family Megapodiidae – megapodes (21 species) • Family Cracidae – chachalacas, curassows, and guans (55 species) • Family Numididae – guineafowl (6 species) • Family Odontophoridae – New World quail (34 species) • Family Phasianidae – pheasants and allies (183 species) southern or crested screamer
    [Show full text]
  • Data Types and the Phylogeny of Neoaves
    Article Data Types and the Phylogeny of Neoaves Edward L. Braun * and Rebecca T. Kimball * Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA * Correspondence: ebraun68@ufl.edu (E.L.B.); rkimball@ufl.edu (R.T.K.) Simple Summary: Some of the earliest studies using molecular data to resolve evolutionary history separated birds into three main groups: Paleognathae (ostriches and allies), Galloanseres (ducks and chickens), and Neoaves (the remaining ~95% of avian species). The early evolution of Neoaves, however, has remained challenging to understand, even as data from whole genomes have become available. We have recently proposed that some of the conflicts among recent studies may be due to the type of genomic data that is analyzed (regions that code for proteins versus regions that do not). However, a rigorous examination of this hypothesis using coding and non-coding data from the same genomic regions sequenced from a relatively large number of species has not yet been conducted. Here we perform such an analysis and show that data type does influence the methods used to infer evolutionary relationships from molecular sequences. We also show that conducting analyses using models of sequence evolution that were chosen to minimize reconstruction errors result in coding and non-coding trees that are much more similar, and we add to the evidence that non-coding data provide better information regarding neoavian relationships. While a few relationships remain problematic, we are approaching a good understanding of the evolutionary history for major avian groups. Abstract: The phylogeny of Neoaves, the largest clade of extant birds, has remained unclear despite intense study.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Available
    Animal Behaviour 179 (2021) 235e245 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Differences in flight initiation distances between African and Australian birds * Michael A. Weston a, b, , Anna Radkovic a, b, Lennox Kirao c , Patrick-Jean Guay a, d, Wouter F. D. Van Dongen a, b, Philista Malaki e, Daniel T. Blumstein f , Matthew R. E. Symonds a, b a Deakin University, Geelong, Australia b School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and the Built Environment, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia c A Rocha Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya d Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia e National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya f Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A. article info Associations between escape behaviours of birds approached by humans and life history traits differ Article history: between continents. This suggests environment and history have shaped the evolution of escape at the Received 11 October 2020 continental scale. We compared the escape behaviour of birds between eastern Australia (relatively low Initial acceptance 5 January 2021 density and shorter history of human presence) and eastern Africa (high density and substantially longer Final acceptance 31 May 2021 history of human presence), in relation to life and natural history traits known to influence escape behaviour. We examined associations between flight initiation distance (FID) and life and natural history MS. number: 20-00743R variables, using phylogenetically controlled analysis and model selection procedures, for 9372 FIDs from 516 bird species. Overall, African birds had shorter FIDs than Australian birds; however, this difference Keywords: was only observed among nonmigratory (resident) species.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Genome Analyses Resolve Early Branches in the Tree of Life of Modern Birds Erich D
    AFLOCKOFGENOMES 90. J. F. Storz, J. C. Opazo, F. G. Hoffmann, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. RESEARCH ARTICLE 66, 469–478 (2013). 91. F. G. Hoffmann, J. F. Storz, T. A. Gorr, J. C. Opazo, Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1126–1138 (2010). Whole-genome analyses resolve ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Genome assemblies and annotations of avian genomes in this study are available on the avian phylogenomics website early branches in the tree of life (http://phybirds.genomics.org.cn), GigaDB (http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5524/101000), National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and ENSEMBL (NCBI and Ensembl accession numbers of modern birds are provided in table S2). The majority of this study was supported by an internal funding from BGI. In addition, G.Z. was 1 2 3 4,5,6 7 supported by a Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship Erich D. Jarvis, *† Siavash Mirarab, * Andre J. Aberer, Bo Li, Peter Houde, grant (300837); M.T.P.G. was supported by a Danish National Cai Li,4,6 Simon Y. W. Ho,8 Brant C. Faircloth,9,10 Benoit Nabholz,11 Research Foundation grant (DNRF94) and a Lundbeck Foundation Jason T. Howard,1 Alexander Suh,12 Claudia C. Weber,12 Rute R. da Fonseca,6 grant (R52-A5062); C.L. and Q.L. were partially supported by a 4 4 4 4 7,13 14 Danish Council for Independent Research Grant (10-081390); Jianwen Li, Fang Zhang, Hui Li, Long Zhou, Nitish Narula, Liang Liu, and E.D.J. was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ganesh Ganapathy,1 Bastien Boussau,15 Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Diversity of Birds 2015
    Ornithology NREM/ZOOL 4464 Dr. Tim O’Connell Spring 2015 A Classification of Birds of the World – Laboratory Investigations As students of Ornithology, a primary objective for you is to develop a working knowledge of the diversity of birds of the world. As you internalize this information, you will develop a deep appreciation for the central role that evolution plays as the driver of biological diversity. We begin this week in Lab to really explore the diversity of birds through in-depth examination of orders and families. Avian classification is fluid: the ordering and alliance of families and orders differs according to different authorities and new information is continually becoming available that enhances our ability to discern relationships; this results in updated classifications. You are embarking on this voyage during a time of significant taxonomic revision, and much of what you will learn in Lab supersedes classification systems in your field guides. Different authorities (usually committees) often disagree in their assessment of a taxon. Where one authority might recognize a full species, another might recognize it as a subspecies of some other species. Higher-level assignments are tricky too, e.g., some place the South American rheas in their own order (Rheiformes) whereas others lump it in with other ostrich-like birds in Struthioniformes. The American Ornithologists’ Union manages two committees (North American and South American Classification Committees) that review information and render decisions on which taxonomic proposals will be recognized. Each July, the AOU publishes updates to its official checklist. That checklist is commonly accessed via a massive book containing information on distribution, evolutionary affinities, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Vantuinen2009chap60.Pdf
    Advanced birds (Neoaves) Marcel van Tuinen this result is now considered an artifact of limited taxon Department of Biology and Marine Biology, 601 South College sampling (7, 15). Phylogenetic resolution among the main Road, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, NC divergences within Neoaves continues to remain a major 28403-5915, USA ([email protected]) hurdle (10), with most neoavian orders appearing to have diverged in close succession. 7 is “neoavian comb” (10) Abstract on the one hand has been interpreted as evidence for a real (hard) polytomy among most, if not all, neoavian Neoaves, the largest superorder of living birds (Neornithes), orders (12), indicating a rapid evolutionary radiation. consists of 16–24 orders and ~9000 species. Although recent Others have maintained that additional taxonomic and progress has been made, available molecular data continue nucleotide sampling will provide added resolution (10). to show remarkable lack of phylogenetic resolution and the At present, three molecular studies (7, 13, 14) exist basal splits within Neoaves are still uncertain. The neoavian that have included a combination of both complete timetree shows an initial divergence at ~95 million years ago neoavian ordinal sampling and nuclear gene sequen- (Ma) followed by Cretaceous (87–75 Ma) diversifi cation of cing. Two of these studies were based on nuclear gene southern hemispheric orders and younger times for north- ern and aquatic orders (Paleogene, 65–30 Ma). The time- tree thus implicates possible roles for continental breakup (Cretaceous) and climate (Paleogene) in the diversifi cation of advanced birds. Neoavian birds are included in the Subclass Neornithes, and most broadly can be deA ned as those orders with advanced Pight capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Diversification of Birds
    Current Biology Review The Origin and Diversification of Birds Stephen L. Brusatte1,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor2,*, and Erich D. Jarvis3,4,* 1School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, King’s Buildings, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK 2Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 3Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] (S.L.B.), [email protected] (J.K.O.), [email protected] (E.D.J.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.003 Birds are one of the most recognizable and diverse groups of modern vertebrates. Over the past two de- cades, a wealth of new fossil discoveries and phylogenetic and macroevolutionary studies has transformed our understanding of how birds originated and became so successful. Birds evolved from theropod dino- saurs during the Jurassic (around 165–150 million years ago) and their classic small, lightweight, feathered, and winged body plan was pieced together gradually over tens of millions of years of evolution rather than in one burst of innovation. Early birds diversified throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous, becoming capable fliers with supercharged growth rates, but were decimated at the end-Cretaceous extinction alongside their close dinosaurian relatives. After the mass extinction, modern birds (members of the avian crown group) explosively diversified, culminating in more than 10,000 species distributed worldwide today. Introduction dinosaurs Dromaeosaurus albertensis or Troodon formosus.This Birds are one of the most conspicuous groups of animals in the clade includes all living birds and extinct taxa, such as Archaeop- modern world.
    [Show full text]