In the United States Court of Federal Claims No
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 09-575L Filed: August 16, 2012 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HENRY L. HOWARD, et al., * * Fifth Amendment Takings; Rails- Plaintiffs, * to-Trails; Valuation; Ind. Code §§ v. * 32-23-11-6, -7, -8. * UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * J. Robert Sears, Baker, Sterchi Cowden & Rice, L.L.C., St. Louis, Mo. for the plaintiffs. With him were Steven M. Wald, Thomas S. Steward, and Elizabeth G. McCully, Baker, Sterchi Cowden & Rice, L.L.C., St. Louis, Mo. Lary C. Larson, Trial Attorney, Natural Resources Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendant. With him was Ignacia S. Moreno, Assistant Attorney General, Environment and National Resources Division. O P I N I O N HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT The plaintiffs, who claim property interests along a rail line in Cass and Pulaski Counties, in Indiana, filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging that the government caused uncompensated takings of their property interests pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The plaintiffs premise their claim on the on the United States Department of Transportation Surface Transportation Board’s (STB) issuance of a Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU) pursuant to the National Trails System Act (Trails Act), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1241-51 (2006), which authorized the conversion of railroad easement rights-of-way, which run through plaintiffs’ properties from rail use to trail use. The rail line at issue was originally constructed in the late 1800s and early 1900s by a number of railroad companies, including the Chicago, St.
[Show full text]