Health System Resilience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from Singapore

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health System Resilience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from Singapore Practice Health system resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from Singapore 1 1 1 Alvin Qijia Chua , Melisa Mei Jin Tan , Monica Verma , 1 1 1 1 Emeline Kai Lin Han, Li Yang Hsu , Alex Richard Cook , Yik Ying Teo, 1,2 1 Vernon J Lee, Helena Legido- Quigley To cite: Chua AQ, Tan MMJ, ABSTRACT Summary box Verma M, et al. Health Singapore, one of the first countries affected by COVID-19, system resilience in adopted a national strategy for the pandemic which ► Singapore was among the first countries affected by managing the COVID-19 emphasised preparedness through a whole- of- nation pandemic: lessons from COVID-19. Its health system resilience was tested as approach. The pandemic was well contained initially Singapore. BMJ Global Health the pandemic continued to spread following a surge until early April 2020, when there was a surge in cases, 2020;5:e003317. doi:10.1136/ in the number of infected people in early April. attributed to Singapore residents returning from hotspots bmjgh-2020-003317 ► The strength in the response of Singapore to the overseas, and more significantly, rapid transmission COVID-19 pandemic was in part due to coordination locally within migrant worker dormitories. In this paper, Handling editor Seye Abimbola between government agencies. However, we iden- we present the response of Singapore to the COVID-19 tified a few areas of improvement that may provide pandemic based on core dimensions of health system Received 1 July 2020 important learning points for other countries. Revised 23 August 2020 resilience during outbreaks. We also discussed on the ► Understanding reasons for poor uptake of initiatives, Accepted 24 August 2020 surge in cases in April 2020, highlighting efforts to mitigate such as the mobile application for contact tracing, it. There was: (1) clear leadership and governance which may help design of future initiatives that garner adopted flexible plans appropriate to the situation; (2) more public support. timely, accurate and transparent communication from ► Adopting a more inclusive response that protects the government; (3) public health measures to reduce all individuals, including at-risk populations such as imported cases, and detect as well as isolate cases early; migrant workers living in dormitories, is vital to curb (4) maintenance of health service delivery; (5) access to community transmission of outbreaks. crisis financing; and (6) legal foundation to complement policy measures. Areas for improvement include understanding reasons for poor uptake of government initiatives, such as the mobile application for contact and more substantially, rapid transmission tracing and adopting a more inclusive response that locally within migrant worker dormitories. protects all individuals, including at- risk populations. The Singapore received initial recognition from experience in Singapore and lessons learnt will contribute WHO for its approach in COVID-19 contain- to pandemic preparedness and mitigation in the future. ment.3 However, its health system resilience was tested as the pandemic continued to infect more people. Health system resilience is the ability of populations to prepare for and INTRODUCTION effectively respond to crises, by reorganising © Author(s) (or their On 30 January 2020, WHO declared corona- systems to manage the new conditions while employer(s)) 2020. Re- use 4 permitted under CC BY- NC. No virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an interna- maintaining core functions. In this paper, commercial re- use. See rights tional public health emergency. Singapore, a we present the COVID-19 pandemic response and permissions. Published by city state of 5.7 million people, densely popu- of Singapore based on core dimensions of BMJ. lated at 7866 people per square kilometre, health system resilience during outbreaks, as 1 Saw Swee Hock School was among the first countries affected.1 Since elaborated by Nuzzo et al4 and Legido- Quigley of Public Health, National 5 University of Singapore, then, progressive measures were in place to et al. We have adapted the core dimensions Singapore detect and contain the disease. As of 20 August into eight critical functions for our paper, 2Communicable Diseases 2020, Singapore has 56 099 confirmed cases, including leadership and governance, risk Division, Ministry of Health, reflecting more than 50-fold increase since communication, public health outbreak Singapore April, but has kept case fatality rate lower than containment measures, financing, health 2 Correspondence to 0.1% (27 deaths). The surge in cases started service delivery, human resources, legal Alvin Qijia Chua; in early April and was attributed to Singapore foundation, as well as political factors and alvin. chua@ nus. edu. sg residents returning from hotspots overseas, values that shape the response, experiences Chua AQ, et al. BMJ Global Health 2020;5:e003317. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003317 1 BMJ Global Health and behaviours of individuals and communities during members. Progressive reopening in June 2020 allowed the outbreak. Considering the surge of cases since April returnees from selected countries to serve their SHN at 2020, we also reviewed its significance and highlighted home if they remained in those countries the last consec- interventions to contain it. utive 14 days.11 Deferment of outbound travel was still advised. Short- term visitors were still not allowed entry, except for official travel permitted under special arrange- LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE ments. The national strategy for pandemic in Singapore empha- sised preparedness through a whole-of- nation approach. Detecting and isolating cases early Since the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Singapore employed complementary detection methods (SARS) outbreak, nationwide efforts were implemented when the outbreak started.12 Case definitions were based to prepare institutions and individuals for pandemic on clinical and epidemiological data, updated regu- response. Organisations simulated possible scenarios larly according to evolving global situations. There was of pandemics and developed corresponding outbreak 6 enhanced surveillance for patients with pneumonia or management plans. A multiministry government task- prolonged acute respiratory symptoms and patients in force was convened to coordinate actions between clin- intensive care units (ICUs). Physicians were given discre- ical and non- clinical stakeholders, centralise efforts and 7 tion to test patients for COVID-19 based on clinical suspi- disseminate information. The taskforce, comprising cion even if case definition was not fulfilled. Laboratory heads of ministries, led and coordinated actions between testing capacity was scaled up in phases, expanding to different agencies. For example, Ministry of Health all public hospitals and major private laboratories. As (MOH) worked closely with academic institutions to of 1 June 2020, more than 408 000 tests were conducted provide timely epidemiological and clinical data about (71 700 tests per million population), with plans to COVID-19 in the population. The taskforce designed and increase testing capacity from 8000 to 40 000 tests per implemented measures which were guided by scientific day.13 evidence. Individuals who tested positive were immediately isolated and interviewed for contact tracing. Contact RISK COMMUNICATION tracing operations led by MOH were aided by dedicated contact tracing teams at the hospitals, the Singapore Clear communication channels between the govern- Armed Forces (SAF) and the Singapore Police Force.14 ment and all sectors are essential to translate policy into Hospital contact tracers interviewed confirmed cases to intended actions. The taskforce was transparent and map their activity history over the last 14 days prior to frequent in providing situational updates, as well as new onset of symptoms, until diagnosis and isolation. This guidance and its associated rationale through traditional information was passed to MOH where their contact and social media channels, and regular press confer- tracers called people whom the patient had interacted ences. These nationwide communication channels were with, to fill information gaps, and to identify close vulnerable to misinformation. MOH regularly clarified contacts. Close contacts and lower- risk contacts identi- misinformation, encouraging the public to follow accu- fied were placed under quarantine and phone surveil- rate and reliable information on official channels. lance, respectively. More than 1300 personnel from SAF and Ministry of Defence helped trace and monitor all PUBLIC HEALTH OUTBREAK CONTAINMENT MEASURES contacts via phone during the 14-day period, referring 15 Singapore adopted a three-pronged approach to contain those who reported symptoms to hospitals. Importantly, COVID-19: (1) reducing spread from imported cases; (2) cases were isolated at hospitals or community isolation detecting and isolating cases early; and (3) emphasising facilities, akin Fangcang hospitals in China, rather than 16 and supporting social responsibility.8 at home where they might infect household members. More than 800 Public Health Preparedness Clinics Reducing spread from imported cases (PHPCs) were activated to enhance detection and Since identification of the first imported case in Singa- management of potential cases. PHPCs were private pore, various phases of travel restrictions were imple- primary care clinics responsible for screening and refer- mented as the global situation worsened. Starting from ring severe cases
Recommended publications
  • Singapore's Response to Covid-19
    CHAPTER 4 Singapore’s Response to Covid-19 Abstract This chapter will discuss Singapore’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, focusing in particular on how it has mobilised and adapted its policy capacities to deal with the pandemic. I will also discuss the new capacities that were established this period. In focusing on how policy capacities were drawn upon or created in its Covid-19 response, this chapter will provide readers with an understanding of the various policy capacities that are necessary for responding to pandemics and other healthcare crises, as well as the capacity limitations or deficiencies that may have posed challenges for policymakers. Keywords Covid-19 · Singapore · Pandemic response · Policy capacity Like the SARS virus, the Covid-19 coronavirus first entered Singapore through its borders. In this case, it was a 66-year-old Chinese national who had arrived in Singapore from Wuhan on 20 January 2020 and was subsequently tested positive for the virus on 23 January 2020 (Yong 2020a). Singapore would within months experience high rates of infec- tion, with the number of confirmed Covid-19 cases exceeding 55,000 as at time of writing. Such high rates of infection were wholly unexpected, given Singapore’s excellent public healthcare system and its reputation as a leading medical hub. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature 67 Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 J. J. Woo, Capacity-building and Pandemics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9453-3_4 68 J. J. WOO These high infection rates therefore raise an important question that will be of interest to policy scholars and practitioners alike: how did such high levels of infection occur in a high capacity country such as Singapore? This question will drive the discussions that form the rest of this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Driven Contact Tracing Using Tracetogether
    Community-driven contact tracing using TraceTogether This is part of a joint work with Maha Ashour, this is the part I wrote. Introduction Contact tracing is the tracking down of people that were exposed to an individual infected with a virus while they were contagious [1]. It is an important public health intervention that has taken on a renewed urgency in light of the 2019-20 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic [2]. The aim is to lower the burden on healthcare systems due to the virus while incurring smaller economic costs than that of the population wide self quarantine measures being implemented. Contact tracing does this by enabling targeted quarantines and faster testing and isolation of infected individuals. Automatic contact tracing is meant to be a useful and cost-effective supplement to manual contact tracing. The latter is limited by imperfect human recall and/or incomplete information due to the difficulty in identifying unknown contacts or ‘strangers’. Automatic contract tracing can be used to handle a large percentage of the more simple cases so that the limited resources for manual tracing can be directed towards the minority of more complex cases. The primary goal of privacy preserving contact tracing is to facilitate these efforts without putting into place - and normalising - deeper governmental surveillance on civilians. What exactly I mean by privacy preserving will be discussed in the next section. The picture below is from the slides of John D Wilkinson presented at a recent MIT webinar on contact tracing [3]. It shows a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve for a diagnostic system is a plot of true positive rate against false positive rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Contact Tracing and the Coronavirus: Israeli and Comparative Perspectives
    DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING AND THE CORONAVIRUS: ISRAELI AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES TEHILLA SHWARTZ ALTSHULER RACHEL ARIDOR HERSHKOVITZ GOVERNANCE | AUGUST 2020 DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING AND THE CORONAVIRUS: ISRAELI AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES TEHILLA SHWARTZ ALTSHULER RACHEL ARIDOR HERSHKOVITZ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Digital contact tracing is the main technological issue currently facing countries that are dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper explains the concept of digital contact tracing and highlights its importance as a helpful tool for human epidemiological investigations and for minimizing the spread of the novel coronavirus. It goes on to survey the international scale of policy tools that have been selected for the purpose of digital contact tracing — ranging from China, which imposed mandatory means on all citizens that incorporate artificial intelligence and generate a “health code”; to Asian democracies such as South Korea and Taiwan, which have implemented intrusive digital tracking tools that are run by civil agencies, with no involvement of the secret services; to the democratic countries of Europe as well as Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, which employ digital contact tracing only with citizens’ consent. Israel, it was found, has positioned itself between the Asian democracies and China. We believe that a new outbreak of the pandemic in the winter of 2020-2021 is liable to prompt countries to choose one of two options. The first is to refrain from using digital contact-tracing technology because of its infringement on privacy. We believe this would be the wrong choice, because it means losing a major technological advantage for coping with the virus and would merely reinforce the mistaken argument that privacy and innovation are incompatible.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Contact Tracing Primer
    Digital Contact Tracing Primer Erik Niemeyer, Gunnison County EOC, COVID-19 ICS Team, Investigative Science Section, Research Group Wednesday, May 6, 2020 Digital contact tracing is a method of contact tracing that takes advantage of mobile devices to determine contact between an infected patient and a user. Digital It came to public prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contact Since the initial outbreak, many groups have developed nonstandard protocols designed to allow for wide scale digital contact tracing, most Tracing notably BlueTrace and the Google / Apple contact tracing project. When considering the limitations of mobile devices, there are two Definition competing ways to trace contact: Bluetooth and location-based; each with their own drawbacks. Additionally the protocols can either be centralized or decentralized, meaning contact history can either be processed by a central health authority, or by individual clients in the network. • Currently all major digital contact tracing apps use Bluetooth to track encounters. Typically, Bluetooth is used to transmit anonymous, time-shifting Bluetooth identifiers to nearby devices. Receiving devices then commit these identifiers to a locally stored contact history log. contact • Bluetooth protocols are predominately favored over their location-based counterparts because of their tracing much stronger privacy protections. Because a user's location is not logged as part of the protocols, their location cannot be tracked. Methodologies •No digital contact tracing apps currently make use of GPS, however some implementations do Location make use of network-based location tracking. This approach has the advantage of eliminating the need to download an app. contact •The first contact tracing protocol of this type was deployed in Israel, however all location-based tracing solutions that have access to raw location data have significant privacy problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Summary: 11-13Th Sittings of the 14Th Parliament (2-4 Nov 2020)
    Parliamentary Summary: 11-13th sittings of the 14th Parliament (2-4 Nov 2020) https://singaporevotes.com/2020/11/22/parlsum-2nov2020/ 1 Parliamentary Summary: 11-13th sittings of the 14th Parliament (2-4 Nov 2020) https://singaporevotes.com/2020/11/22/parlsum-2nov2020/ Contents Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 Parti Liyani v Public Prosecutor ............................................................................................. 5 Criminal justice system .......................................................................................................... 6 Sexual misconduct on campus ............................................................................................. 9 14 Oct MRT service disruption ............................................................................................ 11 Capital offences .................................................................................................................. 13 Migrant workers and legal access ....................................................................................... 14 COVID-19 Phase Three measures ....................................................................................... 15 TraceTogether accessibility ................................................................................................. 16 Second reading of the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) (Amendment No. 3) Bill ............. 18 MediShield Life premiums
    [Show full text]
  • Market-Level Analysis of Government-Backed COVID-19
    Market-level Analysis of Government-backed COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps Huiyi Wang Liu Wang∗ Haoyu Wang Beijing University of Posts and Beijing University of Posts and Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China Telecommunications, China Telecommunications, China ABSTRACT the world have adopted numerous measures, including lock- To help curb the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, govern- downs, social distancing, and contact tracing. In general, ments and public health authorities around the world have contact tracing is the process of identification of persons who launched a number of contact-tracing apps. Although con- may have come into contact with an infected person (“con- tact tracing apps have received extensive attentions from the tacts”) for identifying and supporting exposed individuals to be research community, no existing work has characterized the quarantined on time [1]. Past experience suggested that Con- users’ adoption of contact tracing apps from the app market tact tracing is the key to slowing the spread of contagious level. In this work, we perform the first market-level analysis diseases, including COVID-19 [2]. of contact tracing apps. We perform a longitudinal empirical As a result, governments and public health authorities study (over 4 months) of eight government-backed COVID- around the world have launched a number of contact-tracing 19 contact tracing apps in iOS app store. We first collect all mobile apps. By the time of this study, there are at least the daily meta information (e.g., app updates, app rating, 50 contact tracing apps in both Google Play and iOS App app comments, etc.) of these contact tracing apps from their Store.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Tracing in the Privacy Age What’S the Future of Digital Contact Tracing in NZ?
    Contact tracing in the privacy age What’s the future of digital contact tracing in NZ? “Contact tracing” is one of the phrases Covid-19 has introduced into our everyday vernacular and even our legislation. Most New Zealand businesses, including retail stores, malls, cafes, cinemas and gyms, are now able to operate if they comply with public health guidelines, including the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Alert Level 2) Order 2020. One of the requirements imposed by the Order is for businesses to keep records to enable contact tracing. The question now is how do we effectively contact trace on national scale, which practicably means digitally, while keeping within our current regulatory regime? In this article, we comment on the data privacy issues involved, and look at what the public sector or any business looking to develop or implement digital contact tracing solutions should consider. What you need to know: Keeping records to enable contact Digital contact tracing solutions should tracing is a legal requirement. be developed with a “privacy by design” approach, to give the public confidence in these solutions. Other countries have examples of how digital contact tracing can work effectively. Additional privacy safeguards should be implemented before, during and Effective digital contact-tracing requires after development of any digital contact wide public adoption. tracing solution. Authored by Karen Ngan and Po Tsai of Simpson Grierson and reproduced with permission. This article originally appeared on the Simpson Grierson site, here. The information in this article was current as at the date of publication of 15 May 2020. To see the most recent developments, please check here.
    [Show full text]
  • COVIDTAS COVID-19 Tracing App Scale—An Evaluation Framework
    sustainability Article COVIDTAS COVID-19 Tracing App Scale— An Evaluation Framework Raghu Raman 1,*, Krishnashree Achuthan 2, Ricardo Vinuesa 3,* and Prema Nedungadi 4 1 Amrita CREATE, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri 690525, India 2 Amrita Center for Cybersecurity Systems and Networks, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri 690525, India; [email protected] 3 KTH Engineering Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri 690525, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.R.); [email protected] (R.V.) Abstract: Mobile apps play an important role in COVID-19 tracing and tracking, with different countries taking different approaches. Our study focuses on 17 government owned COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps (CTAs) and analyze them using a proposed COVIDTAS framework. User satisfaction is not directly related to the COVIDTAS score or the interaction between users and the app developers. To increase adoption of CTAs, government leadership must offer assurance to its citizens that their identify will be concealed and emphasize the benefits of CTAs as it relates to shared public health. While no country has topped the list on all three major factors (COVIDTAS Score, User Reviews, and User Ratings), the CTA from India seems to have above average performance on all three factors. Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; contact tracing; governance; privacy Citation: Raman, R.; Achuthan, K.; Vinuesa, R.; Nedungadi, P. 1. Introduction COVIDTAS COVID-19 Tracing App Scale—An Evaluation Framework. The COVID-19 pandemic, through its sheer scale has highlighted and widened the Sustainability 2021, 13, 2912. https:// socioeconomic divides that exist today and made vulnerable populations such as those doi.org/10.3390/su13052912 with chronic illnesses, elderly, minorities, people of lower socioeconomic backgrounds, etc., more susceptible [1].
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Press Release Upcoming Legislative Provisions For
    PRESS RELEASE UPCOMING LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS FOR USAGE OF DATA FROM DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING SOLUTIONS Singapore, 8 January 2021 We acknowledge our error in not stating that data from TraceTogether is not exempt from the Criminal Procedure Code. 2 In Parliament on 5 January, Minister-in-Charge of the Smart Nation Initiative, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan and Minister for Home Affairs and for Law, Mr K Shanmugam, assured the House and the public that the use of TraceTogether data in criminal investigations would be restricted to serious offences. 3 The Government will pass legislation to formalise these assurances. The legislation will specify that personal data collected through digital contact tracing solutions, which comprise the TraceTogether Programme and the SafeEntry Programme, can only be used for the specific purpose of contact tracing, except where there is a clear and pressing need to use that data for criminal investigation of serious offences. It is not in the public interest to completely deny the Police access to such data, when the safety of the public or the proper conduct of justice is at stake. If a serious criminal offence has been committed, the Police must be able to use this data to bring the perpetrators to justice, seek redress for the victims, and protect society at large. 4 The legislation will set out a full list of seven categories of serious offences for which the personal data collected for COVID-19 contact tracing can be used for Police investigations, inquiries, or court proceedings (please refer to Annex for the categories of offences). The data cannot be used in the investigations, inquiries or court proceedings of any other offence besides these seven categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Together As One
    STANDING TOGETHER AS ONE ISSUE focus 70 The Republic’s spirit of unity comes to the fore in the wake of a pandemic. IN THIS ISSUE 6 8 10 AFTER THE ROAD TO SHARING ACROSS THE STORM SELF-SUFFICIENCY BORDERS IN THIS ISSUE 3 STRONGER TOGETHER ED´S NOTE #SGUNITED, a widely-used hashtag on social media in Singapore, encapsulates the Republic’s spirit of Dear readers, unity and esprit de corps amid the COVID-19 pandemic As we grapple with the wide-ranging effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments and people around the world have come to realise that, 6 despite all the uncertainties, one thing is for sure — the world has changed, perhaps irrevocably. As with all crises, we can either accept the reality and AFTER THE STORM ‘brace for impact’, or adapt and turn adversity into opportunity. Like many Putting the spotlight on how nations, Singapore has opted for the latter. Our Focus story (pages 3-5) partnerships can help countries looks at how Singapore is working together to contain the outbreak through emerge from COVID-19 sophisticated contact tracing efforts, and by ramping up the provision of 8 healthcare services. The onslaught of the virus has exposed economic, social and THE ROAD infrastructural vulnerabilities in many countries. For small and highly TO SELF-SUFFICIENCY urbanised Singapore, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated our efforts to Singapore’s journey to food security safeguard food security, by harnessing technology and through partnerships has roots in partnerships, as with other countries to ensure that food supply chains are not disrupted Experience Singapore discovers (read our In Singapore feature on pages 8-9 to find out more).
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Statement by Mr Lawrence
    MINISTERIAL STATEMENT BY MR LAWRENCE WONG, CO-CHAIR OF THE MULTI-MINISTRY TASKFORCE ON COVID-19, ON ‘SECOND UPDATE ON WHOLE-OF-GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO COVID-19’, 4 MAY 2020 Mr Speaker Sir 1 During our last update to Parliament, I said that the situation was uncertain and fluid, and that we would have to expect daily changes. Indeed, over the past month, our battle against COVID-19 has escalated sharply. We’ve ramped up our resources significantly in response to the challenges. Today, we are continuing to fight the virus on two main fronts. Update on Current Situation 2 First, we are doing all we can to control the serious outbreak amongst migrant workers in the dormitories, and to take care of these workers. We have had a huge spike in cases at the dormitories. The infection is mostly concentrated amongst workers in the construction sector. We now know that the transmission amongst this group has been happening for some time, and occurred not just in the dormitories, but also in common worksites and in places that they went to with their friends after work and on their rest days. That is why we have had clusters outside of the dormitories too – amongst construction workers living in shop-houses and private apartments. 3 To determine the extent of the spread, we have undertaken extensive testing amongst these workers. Many of the workers have very mild symptoms, and they sometimes brush this aside as a very mild cold. So we are testing not just the workers who report sick, but also those that are asymptomatic and well.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement of Contact Tracing with Citizen's Distributed Risk Maps
    entropy Article Improvement of Contact Tracing with Citizen’s Distributed Risk Maps Miguel Rebollo 1,2,* , Rosa María Benito 2, Juan Carlos Losada 2 and Javier Galeano 2 1 VRAIn-Valencian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain 2 Complex Systems Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (R.M.B.); [email protected] (J.C.L.); [email protected] (J.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-963-877-000 Abstract: The rapid spread of COVID-19 has demonstrated the need for accurate information to contain its diffusion. Technological solutions are a complement that can help citizens to be informed about the risk in their environment. Although measures such as contact traceability have been successful in some countries, their use raises society’s resistance. This paper proposes a variation of the consensus processes in directed networks to create a risk map of a determined area. The process shares information with trusted contacts: people we would notify in the case of being infected. When the process converges, each participant would have obtained the risk map for the selected zone. The results are compared with the pilot project’s impact testing of the Spanish contact tracing app (RadarCOVID). The paper also depicts the results combining both strategies: contact tracing to detect potential infections and risk maps to avoid movements into conflictive areas. Although some works affirm that contact tracing apps need 60% of users to control the propagation, our results indicate that Citation: Rebollo, M.; Benito, R.M.; a 40% could be enough.
    [Show full text]