Ethics of Digital Contact Tracing Wearables J Med Ethics: First Published As 10.1136/Medethics-2020-106958 on 14 May 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ethics of Digital Contact Tracing Wearables J Med Ethics: First Published As 10.1136/Medethics-2020-106958 on 14 May 2021 Original research Ethics of digital contact tracing wearables J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2020-106958 on 14 May 2021. Downloaded from G Owen Schaefer ,1 Angela Ballantyne1,2 1Centre for Biomedical Ethics, ABSTRACT contexts the challenges may differ. For comparative Yong Loo Lin School of The success of digital COVID-19 contact tracing purposes we also refer briefly to the use of contract Medicine, National University of tracing technology in Australia and New Zealand. Singapore, Singapore requires a strategy that successfully addresses the 2Department of Primary Health digital divide—inequitable access to technology such Our starting point is that COVID-19 contact Care and General Practice, as smartphones. Lack of access both undermines the tracing apps are, under the right governance condi- University of Otago, Wellington, degree of social benefit achieved by the use of tracing tions, a defensible public health tool to promote New Zealand apps, and exacerbates existing social and health effective identification of COVID-19 contacts inequities because those who lack access are likely and the deployment of appropriate public health Correspondence to measures in response. Some of the risks and chal- Dr G Owen Schaefer, Centre for to already be disadvantaged. Recently, Singapore has Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin introduced portable tracing wearables (with the same lenges of deploying apps, especially to privacy, are School of Medicine, National functionality as a contact tracing app) to address the discussed below. But in a public health emergency, University of Singapore, equity gap and promote public health. We argue that those privacy risks are substantially less urgent Singapore 117597, Singapore; governments have an ethical obligation to ensure fair compared with the risks of leaving contacts of owen_ schaefer@ nus. edu. sg access to the protective benefits of contract tracing COVID-19 cases undetected and at risk of further Received 30 September 2020 during the pandemic and that wearables are an effective spreading the virus—especially when the apps are Revised 27 February 2021 way of addressing some important equity issues. The subject to standards of good governance. Accepted 4 May 2021 most contentious issues about contact tracing apps Our analysis aims to describe the ethical merits have been the potential infringements of privacy and and complications of the use of wearables in the individual liberty, especially where the use of apps or Singapore context, and to capture useful lessons other technology (such as wearables or QR codes) is for other countries considering the use of tracing required for access to certain spaces. Here we argue that wearables. wearables, as opposed to apps alone, will make a digital We propose that wearables are a ‘value add’ that contact tracing mandate more practical and explain should be developed in parallel to contact tracing some conditions under which such a mandate would be apps in order to maximise apps’ benefits and reduce justified. We focus on Singapore as a case study that has health inequities. We further argue that wearables recently deployed contact tracing wearables nationally, may make feasible digital contact tracing mandates but also reference debate about wearables in Australia for entry into public spaces, and that under the right and New Zealand. Our analysis will be relevant to conditions these mandates can be well justified. counties trialling similar portable tracing wearables. BACKGROUND ON CONTACT TRACING APPS http://jme.bmj.com/ INTRODUCTION In order to appreciate the ethics of contact tracing As COVID-19 continues to beleaguer the world, wearables, we first need to understand how they are there is sustained interest in developing and being developed in light of the limitations of contact deploying digital contact tracing tools. One of the tracing apps. Apps are designed to complement and most common forms of digital contact tracing is enhance (rather than replace) the current manual through smartphone applications (apps) that can contact tracing performed by public health officials help public health officials identify individuals or volunteers. Manual contact tracing is expensive, on October 2, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. with whom patients with COVID-19 have been slow and labour intensive. These apps’ primary in contact. More recently, several countries have purpose is to record when two app users are in close begun developing wearable contact tracing tokens proximity for an extended duration of time. Then, as a supplement or alternative to the use of such if one user is later diagnosed with COVID-19, the apps. app data could be used to efficiently identify indi- In this paper, we use Singapore as a specific case viduals who may have been exposed to the virus study to examine the ethics of newly developed and ensure they are promptly tested themselves. A contact tracing wearables intended to supplement number of different designs have been proposed existing contact tracing apps. We focus on Singa- and developed, with variations in terms of what pore for several reasons. One, Singapore is one of data are gathered (eg, Bluetooth vs Global Posi- © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No the first countries in the world to produce contact tioning System), how data are stored and whether commercial re- use. See rights tracing wearables, and is currently committed to public health officials are able to retrieve data and permissions. Published making the wearables available to every resident.1 from certain users (‘centralized’ vs ‘decentralized’ by BMJ. Two, the ethics of contact tracing is highly context models). Concurrently, several frameworks for the To cite: Schaefer GO, sensitive, contingent on a country’s specific health ethical oversight and governance of contact tracing 2–8 Ballantyne A. J Med Ethics conditions, technological capacity, legal protec- apps have been promulgated. Epub ahead of print: [please tions, vulnerabilities, power structures and other Contact tracing apps may be beneficial for the include Day Month Year]. local factors. We illustrate the ways in which these individual user and for the community. First, doi:10.1136/ medethics-2020-106958 socioeconomic factors contextualise contact tracing there is a potential personal benefit to users of the tools in Singapore, and indicate how in other app as they can be quickly informed of any close Schaefer GO, Ballantyne A. J Med Ethics 2021;0:1–5. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106958 1 Original research contact with someone who has tested positive for COVID-19, An important difficulty with contact tracing apps identified J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2020-106958 on 14 May 2021. Downloaded from encouraging the user to seek testing that could lead to earlier by several commentators is lack of universal access.2 4–8 Some and more effective treatment. Second, there is a potential public people do not have a smartphone, or a smartphone with Blue- health benefit because the app can improve the effectiveness and tooth capabilities.4 Others may be reluctant to download a new efficiency of contact tracing, ensuring timely delivery of stay- app on their phone, whether out of suspicion of misuse or mere at- home noticesi and other public health measures that help inertia. This lack of universal access and acceptability poses two prevent further community transmission. related ethical problems—effectively protecting public health This second benefit is only possible on a ‘centralized’ model and promoting justice. of contact tracing apps, where public health officials receive the First, for the apps to effectively assist in suppressing viral app data of patients with COVID-19. We focus in this paper on transmission, there needs to be sufficient public uptake.13 Coun- centralised models of digital contact tracing, because centralised tries that have promoted national apps, like Norway and India, gathering of data accessible to public health officials is essential have fallen far short of stated targets.14 Rates of downloads may for the app to effectively assist in contact tracing. Decentralised in fact overstate the number of individuals usefully covered by models might involve less privacy risk to individuals, but they the app, since the app could be downloaded but then deleted also provide less potential public health benefit because public or deactivated. If insufficient people use an app, its utility in health officials are unable to access the data. In addition, it is protecting public safety is undermined. not clear how contact tracing wearables could be integrated into Second, those who lack access to a smartphone that can a decentralised system.6 Since wearables are not tied to an app, support contact tracing apps are more likely to be disadvantaged there would not be a ready means to easily and anonymously due to factors such as socioeconomic status, residency status or inform individuals of their exposure to someone who had tested age. This presents an equity issue because specific populations at positive. It is not a coincidence that countries such as Singapore higher risk of COVID-19 have less opportunity to benefit from and New Zealand that currently employ a centralised model protective public health initiatives. Equity refers to the absence of digital contact tracing are also the very ones considering the of avoidable or remediable difference between groups of people. deployment of wearables. Tracing wearables are a potential solution to these challenges. Contact tracing is a form of public health surveillance and To understand the equity considerations relevant to the as such raises valid concerns about privacy, liberty and propor- adoption of tracing wearables, let us consider the example tionality. Contact data are sensitive, and theoretically could be of Singapore. Due to lower rates of smartphone ownership, misused—for example, by passing the data to law enforcement some specific subpopulations known to be at greater risk of officials, which goes well beyond the public health justifica- COVID-19 (foreign workers and older individuals) are also less tion for gathering the data.
Recommended publications
  • Singapore's Response to Covid-19
    CHAPTER 4 Singapore’s Response to Covid-19 Abstract This chapter will discuss Singapore’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, focusing in particular on how it has mobilised and adapted its policy capacities to deal with the pandemic. I will also discuss the new capacities that were established this period. In focusing on how policy capacities were drawn upon or created in its Covid-19 response, this chapter will provide readers with an understanding of the various policy capacities that are necessary for responding to pandemics and other healthcare crises, as well as the capacity limitations or deficiencies that may have posed challenges for policymakers. Keywords Covid-19 · Singapore · Pandemic response · Policy capacity Like the SARS virus, the Covid-19 coronavirus first entered Singapore through its borders. In this case, it was a 66-year-old Chinese national who had arrived in Singapore from Wuhan on 20 January 2020 and was subsequently tested positive for the virus on 23 January 2020 (Yong 2020a). Singapore would within months experience high rates of infec- tion, with the number of confirmed Covid-19 cases exceeding 55,000 as at time of writing. Such high rates of infection were wholly unexpected, given Singapore’s excellent public healthcare system and its reputation as a leading medical hub. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature 67 Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 J. J. Woo, Capacity-building and Pandemics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9453-3_4 68 J. J. WOO These high infection rates therefore raise an important question that will be of interest to policy scholars and practitioners alike: how did such high levels of infection occur in a high capacity country such as Singapore? This question will drive the discussions that form the rest of this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Health System Resilience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from Singapore
    Practice Health system resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from Singapore 1 1 1 Alvin Qijia Chua , Melisa Mei Jin Tan , Monica Verma , 1 1 1 1 Emeline Kai Lin Han, Li Yang Hsu , Alex Richard Cook , Yik Ying Teo, 1,2 1 Vernon J Lee, Helena Legido- Quigley To cite: Chua AQ, Tan MMJ, ABSTRACT Summary box Verma M, et al. Health Singapore, one of the first countries affected by COVID-19, system resilience in adopted a national strategy for the pandemic which ► Singapore was among the first countries affected by managing the COVID-19 emphasised preparedness through a whole- of- nation pandemic: lessons from COVID-19. Its health system resilience was tested as approach. The pandemic was well contained initially Singapore. BMJ Global Health the pandemic continued to spread following a surge until early April 2020, when there was a surge in cases, 2020;5:e003317. doi:10.1136/ in the number of infected people in early April. attributed to Singapore residents returning from hotspots bmjgh-2020-003317 ► The strength in the response of Singapore to the overseas, and more significantly, rapid transmission COVID-19 pandemic was in part due to coordination locally within migrant worker dormitories. In this paper, Handling editor Seye Abimbola between government agencies. However, we iden- we present the response of Singapore to the COVID-19 tified a few areas of improvement that may provide pandemic based on core dimensions of health system Received 1 July 2020 important learning points for other countries. Revised 23 August 2020 resilience during outbreaks. We also discussed on the ► Understanding reasons for poor uptake of initiatives, Accepted 24 August 2020 surge in cases in April 2020, highlighting efforts to mitigate such as the mobile application for contact tracing, it.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Driven Contact Tracing Using Tracetogether
    Community-driven contact tracing using TraceTogether This is part of a joint work with Maha Ashour, this is the part I wrote. Introduction Contact tracing is the tracking down of people that were exposed to an individual infected with a virus while they were contagious [1]. It is an important public health intervention that has taken on a renewed urgency in light of the 2019-20 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic [2]. The aim is to lower the burden on healthcare systems due to the virus while incurring smaller economic costs than that of the population wide self quarantine measures being implemented. Contact tracing does this by enabling targeted quarantines and faster testing and isolation of infected individuals. Automatic contact tracing is meant to be a useful and cost-effective supplement to manual contact tracing. The latter is limited by imperfect human recall and/or incomplete information due to the difficulty in identifying unknown contacts or ‘strangers’. Automatic contract tracing can be used to handle a large percentage of the more simple cases so that the limited resources for manual tracing can be directed towards the minority of more complex cases. The primary goal of privacy preserving contact tracing is to facilitate these efforts without putting into place - and normalising - deeper governmental surveillance on civilians. What exactly I mean by privacy preserving will be discussed in the next section. The picture below is from the slides of John D Wilkinson presented at a recent MIT webinar on contact tracing [3]. It shows a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve for a diagnostic system is a plot of true positive rate against false positive rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Contact Tracing and the Coronavirus: Israeli and Comparative Perspectives
    DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING AND THE CORONAVIRUS: ISRAELI AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES TEHILLA SHWARTZ ALTSHULER RACHEL ARIDOR HERSHKOVITZ GOVERNANCE | AUGUST 2020 DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING AND THE CORONAVIRUS: ISRAELI AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES TEHILLA SHWARTZ ALTSHULER RACHEL ARIDOR HERSHKOVITZ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Digital contact tracing is the main technological issue currently facing countries that are dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper explains the concept of digital contact tracing and highlights its importance as a helpful tool for human epidemiological investigations and for minimizing the spread of the novel coronavirus. It goes on to survey the international scale of policy tools that have been selected for the purpose of digital contact tracing — ranging from China, which imposed mandatory means on all citizens that incorporate artificial intelligence and generate a “health code”; to Asian democracies such as South Korea and Taiwan, which have implemented intrusive digital tracking tools that are run by civil agencies, with no involvement of the secret services; to the democratic countries of Europe as well as Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, which employ digital contact tracing only with citizens’ consent. Israel, it was found, has positioned itself between the Asian democracies and China. We believe that a new outbreak of the pandemic in the winter of 2020-2021 is liable to prompt countries to choose one of two options. The first is to refrain from using digital contact-tracing technology because of its infringement on privacy. We believe this would be the wrong choice, because it means losing a major technological advantage for coping with the virus and would merely reinforce the mistaken argument that privacy and innovation are incompatible.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Contact Tracing Primer
    Digital Contact Tracing Primer Erik Niemeyer, Gunnison County EOC, COVID-19 ICS Team, Investigative Science Section, Research Group Wednesday, May 6, 2020 Digital contact tracing is a method of contact tracing that takes advantage of mobile devices to determine contact between an infected patient and a user. Digital It came to public prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contact Since the initial outbreak, many groups have developed nonstandard protocols designed to allow for wide scale digital contact tracing, most Tracing notably BlueTrace and the Google / Apple contact tracing project. When considering the limitations of mobile devices, there are two Definition competing ways to trace contact: Bluetooth and location-based; each with their own drawbacks. Additionally the protocols can either be centralized or decentralized, meaning contact history can either be processed by a central health authority, or by individual clients in the network. • Currently all major digital contact tracing apps use Bluetooth to track encounters. Typically, Bluetooth is used to transmit anonymous, time-shifting Bluetooth identifiers to nearby devices. Receiving devices then commit these identifiers to a locally stored contact history log. contact • Bluetooth protocols are predominately favored over their location-based counterparts because of their tracing much stronger privacy protections. Because a user's location is not logged as part of the protocols, their location cannot be tracked. Methodologies •No digital contact tracing apps currently make use of GPS, however some implementations do Location make use of network-based location tracking. This approach has the advantage of eliminating the need to download an app. contact •The first contact tracing protocol of this type was deployed in Israel, however all location-based tracing solutions that have access to raw location data have significant privacy problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Summary: 11-13Th Sittings of the 14Th Parliament (2-4 Nov 2020)
    Parliamentary Summary: 11-13th sittings of the 14th Parliament (2-4 Nov 2020) https://singaporevotes.com/2020/11/22/parlsum-2nov2020/ 1 Parliamentary Summary: 11-13th sittings of the 14th Parliament (2-4 Nov 2020) https://singaporevotes.com/2020/11/22/parlsum-2nov2020/ Contents Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 Parti Liyani v Public Prosecutor ............................................................................................. 5 Criminal justice system .......................................................................................................... 6 Sexual misconduct on campus ............................................................................................. 9 14 Oct MRT service disruption ............................................................................................ 11 Capital offences .................................................................................................................. 13 Migrant workers and legal access ....................................................................................... 14 COVID-19 Phase Three measures ....................................................................................... 15 TraceTogether accessibility ................................................................................................. 16 Second reading of the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) (Amendment No. 3) Bill ............. 18 MediShield Life premiums
    [Show full text]
  • Market-Level Analysis of Government-Backed COVID-19
    Market-level Analysis of Government-backed COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps Huiyi Wang Liu Wang∗ Haoyu Wang Beijing University of Posts and Beijing University of Posts and Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China Telecommunications, China Telecommunications, China ABSTRACT the world have adopted numerous measures, including lock- To help curb the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, govern- downs, social distancing, and contact tracing. In general, ments and public health authorities around the world have contact tracing is the process of identification of persons who launched a number of contact-tracing apps. Although con- may have come into contact with an infected person (“con- tact tracing apps have received extensive attentions from the tacts”) for identifying and supporting exposed individuals to be research community, no existing work has characterized the quarantined on time [1]. Past experience suggested that Con- users’ adoption of contact tracing apps from the app market tact tracing is the key to slowing the spread of contagious level. In this work, we perform the first market-level analysis diseases, including COVID-19 [2]. of contact tracing apps. We perform a longitudinal empirical As a result, governments and public health authorities study (over 4 months) of eight government-backed COVID- around the world have launched a number of contact-tracing 19 contact tracing apps in iOS app store. We first collect all mobile apps. By the time of this study, there are at least the daily meta information (e.g., app updates, app rating, 50 contact tracing apps in both Google Play and iOS App app comments, etc.) of these contact tracing apps from their Store.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Tracing in the Privacy Age What’S the Future of Digital Contact Tracing in NZ?
    Contact tracing in the privacy age What’s the future of digital contact tracing in NZ? “Contact tracing” is one of the phrases Covid-19 has introduced into our everyday vernacular and even our legislation. Most New Zealand businesses, including retail stores, malls, cafes, cinemas and gyms, are now able to operate if they comply with public health guidelines, including the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Alert Level 2) Order 2020. One of the requirements imposed by the Order is for businesses to keep records to enable contact tracing. The question now is how do we effectively contact trace on national scale, which practicably means digitally, while keeping within our current regulatory regime? In this article, we comment on the data privacy issues involved, and look at what the public sector or any business looking to develop or implement digital contact tracing solutions should consider. What you need to know: Keeping records to enable contact Digital contact tracing solutions should tracing is a legal requirement. be developed with a “privacy by design” approach, to give the public confidence in these solutions. Other countries have examples of how digital contact tracing can work effectively. Additional privacy safeguards should be implemented before, during and Effective digital contact-tracing requires after development of any digital contact wide public adoption. tracing solution. Authored by Karen Ngan and Po Tsai of Simpson Grierson and reproduced with permission. This article originally appeared on the Simpson Grierson site, here. The information in this article was current as at the date of publication of 15 May 2020. To see the most recent developments, please check here.
    [Show full text]
  • COVIDTAS COVID-19 Tracing App Scale—An Evaluation Framework
    sustainability Article COVIDTAS COVID-19 Tracing App Scale— An Evaluation Framework Raghu Raman 1,*, Krishnashree Achuthan 2, Ricardo Vinuesa 3,* and Prema Nedungadi 4 1 Amrita CREATE, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri 690525, India 2 Amrita Center for Cybersecurity Systems and Networks, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri 690525, India; [email protected] 3 KTH Engineering Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri 690525, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.R.); [email protected] (R.V.) Abstract: Mobile apps play an important role in COVID-19 tracing and tracking, with different countries taking different approaches. Our study focuses on 17 government owned COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps (CTAs) and analyze them using a proposed COVIDTAS framework. User satisfaction is not directly related to the COVIDTAS score or the interaction between users and the app developers. To increase adoption of CTAs, government leadership must offer assurance to its citizens that their identify will be concealed and emphasize the benefits of CTAs as it relates to shared public health. While no country has topped the list on all three major factors (COVIDTAS Score, User Reviews, and User Ratings), the CTA from India seems to have above average performance on all three factors. Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; contact tracing; governance; privacy Citation: Raman, R.; Achuthan, K.; Vinuesa, R.; Nedungadi, P. 1. Introduction COVIDTAS COVID-19 Tracing App Scale—An Evaluation Framework. The COVID-19 pandemic, through its sheer scale has highlighted and widened the Sustainability 2021, 13, 2912. https:// socioeconomic divides that exist today and made vulnerable populations such as those doi.org/10.3390/su13052912 with chronic illnesses, elderly, minorities, people of lower socioeconomic backgrounds, etc., more susceptible [1].
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Press Release Upcoming Legislative Provisions For
    PRESS RELEASE UPCOMING LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS FOR USAGE OF DATA FROM DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING SOLUTIONS Singapore, 8 January 2021 We acknowledge our error in not stating that data from TraceTogether is not exempt from the Criminal Procedure Code. 2 In Parliament on 5 January, Minister-in-Charge of the Smart Nation Initiative, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan and Minister for Home Affairs and for Law, Mr K Shanmugam, assured the House and the public that the use of TraceTogether data in criminal investigations would be restricted to serious offences. 3 The Government will pass legislation to formalise these assurances. The legislation will specify that personal data collected through digital contact tracing solutions, which comprise the TraceTogether Programme and the SafeEntry Programme, can only be used for the specific purpose of contact tracing, except where there is a clear and pressing need to use that data for criminal investigation of serious offences. It is not in the public interest to completely deny the Police access to such data, when the safety of the public or the proper conduct of justice is at stake. If a serious criminal offence has been committed, the Police must be able to use this data to bring the perpetrators to justice, seek redress for the victims, and protect society at large. 4 The legislation will set out a full list of seven categories of serious offences for which the personal data collected for COVID-19 contact tracing can be used for Police investigations, inquiries, or court proceedings (please refer to Annex for the categories of offences). The data cannot be used in the investigations, inquiries or court proceedings of any other offence besides these seven categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Together As One
    STANDING TOGETHER AS ONE ISSUE focus 70 The Republic’s spirit of unity comes to the fore in the wake of a pandemic. IN THIS ISSUE 6 8 10 AFTER THE ROAD TO SHARING ACROSS THE STORM SELF-SUFFICIENCY BORDERS IN THIS ISSUE 3 STRONGER TOGETHER ED´S NOTE #SGUNITED, a widely-used hashtag on social media in Singapore, encapsulates the Republic’s spirit of Dear readers, unity and esprit de corps amid the COVID-19 pandemic As we grapple with the wide-ranging effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments and people around the world have come to realise that, 6 despite all the uncertainties, one thing is for sure — the world has changed, perhaps irrevocably. As with all crises, we can either accept the reality and AFTER THE STORM ‘brace for impact’, or adapt and turn adversity into opportunity. Like many Putting the spotlight on how nations, Singapore has opted for the latter. Our Focus story (pages 3-5) partnerships can help countries looks at how Singapore is working together to contain the outbreak through emerge from COVID-19 sophisticated contact tracing efforts, and by ramping up the provision of 8 healthcare services. The onslaught of the virus has exposed economic, social and THE ROAD infrastructural vulnerabilities in many countries. For small and highly TO SELF-SUFFICIENCY urbanised Singapore, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated our efforts to Singapore’s journey to food security safeguard food security, by harnessing technology and through partnerships has roots in partnerships, as with other countries to ensure that food supply chains are not disrupted Experience Singapore discovers (read our In Singapore feature on pages 8-9 to find out more).
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Statement by Mr Lawrence
    MINISTERIAL STATEMENT BY MR LAWRENCE WONG, CO-CHAIR OF THE MULTI-MINISTRY TASKFORCE ON COVID-19, ON ‘SECOND UPDATE ON WHOLE-OF-GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO COVID-19’, 4 MAY 2020 Mr Speaker Sir 1 During our last update to Parliament, I said that the situation was uncertain and fluid, and that we would have to expect daily changes. Indeed, over the past month, our battle against COVID-19 has escalated sharply. We’ve ramped up our resources significantly in response to the challenges. Today, we are continuing to fight the virus on two main fronts. Update on Current Situation 2 First, we are doing all we can to control the serious outbreak amongst migrant workers in the dormitories, and to take care of these workers. We have had a huge spike in cases at the dormitories. The infection is mostly concentrated amongst workers in the construction sector. We now know that the transmission amongst this group has been happening for some time, and occurred not just in the dormitories, but also in common worksites and in places that they went to with their friends after work and on their rest days. That is why we have had clusters outside of the dormitories too – amongst construction workers living in shop-houses and private apartments. 3 To determine the extent of the spread, we have undertaken extensive testing amongst these workers. Many of the workers have very mild symptoms, and they sometimes brush this aside as a very mild cold. So we are testing not just the workers who report sick, but also those that are asymptomatic and well.
    [Show full text]