DOCSLIB.ORG

Humanitarian Snapshot HRP 20161202 Orange

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Humanitarian Snapshot HRP 20161202 Orange UKRAINE: Humanitarian Snapshot - Humanitarian Response Plan 2017 (as of 29 November 2016) OVERVIEW CHECKPOINTSACCESS MAP MAP PEOPLE IN NEED AND PEOPLE TARGETED Largely unnoticed, the conflict in eastern Ukraine continues, Vellykykyyii TOTAL POPULATION Burrlluukk claiming lives, creating new humanitarian needs and intensifying Kharkiv GOVERNMENT pre-existing systemic flaws - from ageing infrastructures to TTrrooititskskee CONTROLLED AREAS Pecheniihy legislative shortcomings - that, in turn, adds to the suffering of Chuhuiv DDvvoorriicchnhnaa civilians. An estimated 4.4 million people are affected and 3.8 Shevchenkove KKupupiianansskk M Zmiiiv Shevchenkove 45 M million need humanitarian assistance, an increase of 0.7 from 0.8 Kharkiivska 2016. The 2017 HRP targets 2.6 million amongst the most BBiliolokkuurarakykynnee NNoovvopopsskkoovv MMaarkrkivkivkaa Balakliia vulnerable, focusing on addressing protection concerns, mitigate SSvvaattoovvee BBoorroovvaa MMiloiloveve PEOPLE IN NEED the cumulative impact the conflict has on civilians, particularly in NON-GOVERNMENT SStatarobrobilislskk OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE time-critical sectors such as shelter, health and WASH, and IIziium BBiliolovvododsskk CONTROLLED AREAS restoring critical livelihood to minimize the effect of the protracted LLuhauhannsskkaa Kreminna Kreminna RRububizizhhnnee RRUUSSSSIAIANN conflict on coping mechanisms. Geographically, particular attention LLyymmaann 1.5M Novoaidar FEDERATION Lysychansk Novoaidar FEDERATION Lozova Barviinkove Lysychansk SSieievvieierrodoneodonetstskk M is given to the areas along the ‘contact line’ experiencing active Blyzniuky 3.8 Blyzniuky Slloovviianansskk fighting, zones where sector-specific life-threatening needs exist, Oleksandriivka KKrraamaattoorrsskk Stanytsia and in areas beyond the Government’s control affected by SSlolovvianoianosseerbrbsskk Stanytsia LuhanLuhanskskaa Drruuzzhhkkiivvkkaa PPopaopassnnaa socio-economic exclusion. Access of conflict-affected civilians to BBaakkhhmmuutt SStatnanytystsiai aLu Luhahnasnksaka PEOPLE TARGETED KKadadiiiivvkkaa LuhLuhaannsskk (EE(EECCPP) ) KKoossttiiananttyynniivkvkaa IDPs IN GOVERNMENT Petropavlivka Dobropillia Alchevsk life-saving goods and services, and of humanitarian actors to Petropavlivka Dobropillia MMaaiiororsskk Alchevsk ((EEEECCPP)) CONTROLLED AREAS people in need continue to be hampered by continuous insecurity, PPeerreevvaalslskk LuLutuhtuhyynnee Horlivka Pokrovsk Horlivka Sorokyne bureaucratic impediments, and logistical challenges. This warrants Mezhova Pokrovsk Sorokyne * YYeennaakkiiiieevvee 2.6 M concerted and systematic advocacy efforts by the Humanitarian Dnipropetrovska 0.3 M Dnipropetrovska Yaasysynunuvvaattaa KKhhrurusstatalnlnyyi i Shakhtarsk Dovzhansk Country Team (HCT) to ensure sustained humanitarian access. MMaakkiivivkkaa Shakhtarsk AAnntrtaratsytsytt Dovzhansk Donetsk Khartsyzk Donetsk Khartsyzk CChhyysstitaiakkoovvee *MoSP registered 1.7 million IDPs, coutrywide. All of them need different types of assistance. Between 0.8 and 1 million IDPs reside permanently in GCA, while The HRP totals $214 million—of this, $ 127 million has been Marinka Velyka Marinka others move frequently across the ‘contact line‘ and, for the purpose of the HRP, are accounted for in the population figure of those living in NGCA. Among those Velyka Marinka Marinka living in GCA, 0.3 million IDPs, the most vulnerable, are targeted with life-saving humanitarian interventions encompasseed in the HRP. Novosilka (EECP) identified as critical priority for which early funding is crucial to Novosilka (EECP) Amvrosiivka Starobesheve Amvrosiivka ensure timely delivery of life-saving assistance, especially for the Novotroitske Starobesheve Donetska Novotroitske TARGETS AND REQUIREMENTS Donetska (EECP) winterisation support in early 2017. Ukraine’s operating context (EECP) Volnovakha presents a unique opportunity to link humanitarian actions Volnovakha REQUIREMENTS (US$) CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS (US$) LLeeggeenndd described in the HRP, with recovery and development initiatives, to Boikivske Bilmak Rozivka Boikivske Entry/Exit Checkpoint ensure seamless transition and long-lasting outcome, particularly Bilmak Rozivka Entry/Exit Checkpoint 127M 2016 access related incidents Pyshchevyk 2016 access related incidents 214M Pyshchevyk in restoring livelihood, which is another critical area of need, and Nikolske (EECP) 'Contact line' as of June 2016 Nikolske (EECP) 'Contact line' as of June 2016 Critical access impediments PEOPLE REQUIREMENTS durable solutions. Novoazovsk Critical access impediments Mariupol Novoazovsk Zaporizka Manhush Mariupol Serious access impediments CLUSTER Zaporizka Manhush Serious access impediments TARGETED STRATEGIC OBGECTIVES Critical Total BELARUS BELARUS RUSSIAN POLAND FEDREURSSATIOAN POLAND Kyiv FEDERATION Berdiansk Kyiv Berdiansk SEA OF WASH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1 SEA OF 2.5M 19.6M 26.2M AZOV AZOV SLOVAKIA SLOVAKIA Advocate for and respond to the protection HUNGARY HUNGARY Protection MOLDOVA 2.1M 37.0M 42.6M needs of conict-aected people with due MOLDOVA SEA OF ROMANIA ASEAZOV OF ROMANIA AZOV regard to International norms and standards 0 10 20 BLACK SEBLAACK Health & Nutrition 0 10 20 SERBIA 1.1M 14.2M 23.3M BULGARIA SEA km SERBIA km BULGARIA STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2 Food Security & Livelihood 0.7M 11.0M 65.2M PRIORITISATION CRITERIA Provide emergency assistance and ensure Shelter/NFI non-discriminatory access to quality 0.3M 32.0M 33.8M essential services for populations in need. Life-saving/core humanitarian Education 0.1M 6.0M 7.6M STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3 Logistics - 1.5M 1.5M Improve the resilience of conict-aected people, prevent further degradation Geography Coordination - 5.8M 5.8M of the humanitarian situation and promote durable solutions, early recovery Multipurpose Cash Assistance 30K - 8.0M and social cohesion. Vulnerability Total 2.6M $127M $214M Creation date: 29 November 2016 Sources: INSO, OCHA, OHCHR, UNHCR, UNICEF, WHO, WFP Feedback: [email protected] Website: www.unocha.org |https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/operations/ukraine.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dynamics of FM Frequencies Allotment for the Local Radio Broadcasting
    DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL RADIO BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: 2015–2018 The Project of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine “Community Broadcasting” NATIONAL COUNCIL MINISTRY OF OF TELEVISION AND RADIO INFORMATION POLICY BROADCASTING OF UKRAINE OF UKRAINE DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL RADIO BROADCASTING: 2015—2018 Overall indicators As of 14 December 2018 local radio stations local radio stations rate of increase in the launched terrestrial broadcast in 24 regions number of local radio broadcasting in 2015―2018 of Ukraine broadcasters in 2015―2018 The average volume of own broadcasting | 11 hours 15 minutes per 24 hours Type of activity of a TV and radio organization For profit radio stations share in the total number of local radio stations Non-profit (communal companies, community organizations) radio stations share in the total number of local radio stations NATIONAL COUNCIL MINISTRY OF OF TELEVISION AND RADIO INFORMATION POLICY BROADCASTING OF UKRAINE OF UKRAINE DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL RADIO BROADCASTING: 2015—2018 The competitions held for available FM radio frequencies for local radio broadcasting competitions held by the National Council out of 97 FM frequencies were granted to the on consideration of which local radio stations broadcasters in 4 format competitions, were granted with FM frequencies participated strictly by local radio stations Number of granted Number of general Number of format Practical steps towards implementation of the FM frequencies competitions* competitions** “Community Broadcasting” project The
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • 20161130 Humanitarian Needs Overview 2017 FINAL.Indd
    HUMANITARIAN 2017 NEEDS OVERVIEW PEOPLE IN NEED 3.8 M NOV 2016 UKRAINE Credit: NRC/Ingrid Prestetun Credit: Th is document is produced on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team and partners. Th is document provides the Humanitarian Country Team’s shared understanding of the crisis, including the most pressing hu- manitarian need and the estimated number of people who need assistance. It represents a consolidated evidence base and helps inform joint strategic response planning. Th e designations employed and the presentation of material in the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoev- er on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. www.unocha.org www.reliefweb.int www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ukraine PART I: PART I: SUMMARY Humanitarian needs and key fi gures Impact of the crisis Breakdown of people in need Concentration of needs 03 Velykyi PART I: Burluk PEOPLE IN NEED Kharkiv Troitske Pechenihy M Chuhuiv Dvorichna 3.8 Zmiiv Shevchenkove Kupiansk Kharkivska Bilokurakyne Novopskov Markivka Balakliia Svatove Borova Milove Starobilsk Izium Luhanska Bilovodsk Kreminna Rubizhne Lyman Novoaidar Lozova Barvinkove Lysychansk Sievierodonetsk Blyzniuky Sloviansk Oleksandrivka Kramatorsk Slovianoserbsk Stanytsia Luhanska Druzhkivka Popasna Bakhmut RUSSIAN Kadiivka Luhansk Kostiantynivka FEDERATION Petropavlivka Dobropillia Alchevsk Perevalsk Lutuhyne Horlivka
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Ukraine Community Partnerships for Local Government Training and Education Project
    U.S.-Ukraine Community Partnerships for Local Government Training and Education Project Award No. 121-A-00-97-00149-00 Quarterly Report July 1-September 30, 2002 Prepared for United States Agency for International Development Regional Mission for Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova Office of Democratic & Social Transition November 12, 2002 Prepared by U.S.-Ukraine Foundation 733 15th Street NW, Suite 1026 Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202-347-4264 FAX: 202-347-4267 E-mail: [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION On July 15, 1997, a cooperative agreement was signed between the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation (USUF) and USAID/Kyiv for the implementation of the U.S.-Ukraine Community Partnerships for Local Government Training and Education Project (CPP). Under the three-year agreement, CPP established 18 partnerships between U.S. and Ukrainian communities to improve public administration in Ukrainian local governments. Each partnership is to identify and address a specific well-defined problem(s) in one of the following areas: housing, transportation, local budgeting, economic development, or citizen participation. In addition, four Regional Training Centers (RTCs) were established to provide training in these same focus areas to Ukrainian local government employees from both partner and non-partner communities. On December 1, 2000, CPP began a two-year cost extension. The RTCs and the Partners newsletter remain unchanged. However, some changes have been made to the project in the cost extension phase, the most important of which is the reduction in the number of partnerships. Due to budgetary constraints, the CPP project description foresaw that the 18 partnerships would be reduced to 12.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key Figures
    Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key figures In need In need coverage (total) (priority) (existing programmes) HHs in private Donetsk obl. 3,150 committed houses and + 37,126 HHs 5,500 apartments Luhansk obl. 2,350 gap GCA Indiv. in CCs committed and Social All Ukraine 7,700 Ind 7,700 Institutions 7,700 gap 5,531* gap 6,000 committed Donetsk obl. 33,500 HHs 14,603 HHs in private 8,603 gap houses and 2,500 committed apartments Luhansk obl. 20,700 HHs 9,000 NGCA 6,500 gap 11,347 committed Indiv. in non- Donetsk obl. 30,900 ind NA specialized CCs 19,553 gap and Social NA committed Luhansk obl. 19,100 ind NA Institutions NA gap 23,182* gap * Note: # of individuals in CCs and social institutions were divided by Cluster coefficient of 2.42 in order to get the final number in HHs Contents 1. Winterization context and objectives .............................................................................................. 2 2. Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Winterization beneficiary prioritization ........................................................................................... 4 4. Heating ............................................................................................................................................. 6 (a) GCA ........................................................................................................................................... 6 (b) NGCA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine ( MM), a Ed on Information Received A
    Latet from the OC pecial Monitoring Miion to Ukraine (MM), aed on information received a of 19:30, 20 Novemer 2018 KYIV 21 November 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. Compared with the previous reporting period, the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The Mission followed up on reports of a grenade explosion in Khartsyzk in which a woman was injured and a man died. The Mission recorded ceasere violations inside the Zolote disengagement area. The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasere to enable repairs to essential civilian infrastructure near Artema and Holmivskyi, as well as repairs to houses in Marinka and Krasnohorivka. It continued to facilitate the operation of the Donetsk Filtration Station. Access for the SMM remained restricted in all three disengagement areas, near Syvash and near Novoazovsk, an area close to the border with the Russian Federation.* The Mission monitored protests in Kyiv, Lviv and Chernivtsi. Ceasere violations[1] In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations, including about 60 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (about 120 explosions). The majority of ceasere violations were recorded in areas south and south-west of the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS), south-east of Svitlodarsk (government-controlled, 57km north-east of Donetsk) and east of Lomakyne (government-controlled, 15km north-east of Mariupol). In Luhansk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations, including 34 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (about 200 explosions). The majority of ceasere violations were recorded in areas west of Kadiivka (formerly Stakhanov, non-government-controlled, 50km west of Luhansk) and south-west of Stanytsia Luhanska (government-controlled, 16km north- east of Luhansk).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine
    Public Council of All-Ukrainian Environmental NGOs under the aegis of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs for preparation to Fifth Pan-European Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs Кyiv — 2003 Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine. Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs. — Kyiv, 2003. — 139 pages The document is prepared by the Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs in the framework of the «Program of Measures for Preparation and Conduction of 5th Pan-European Ministerial Conference» «Environment for Europe» for 2002–2003» approved by the National Organising Committee of Ukraine. Preparation and publication of the report was done wit the support of: Regional Ecological Center - REC-Kyiv; Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine; Milieukontakt Oost Europa in the framework of the project «Towards Kyiv-2003» with financial support of the Ministry of Territorial Planning, Construction and the Environment; UN office in Ukraine Contents Foreword . 1. Environmental Policy and Legislation . 1.1. Legislative Background of Environmental Policy . 1.2. Main State Documents Defining Environmental Policy . 1.3. Enforcement of Constitution of Ukraine . 1.4. Implementation of Environmental Legislation . 1.5. State of Ukrainian Legislation Reforming after Aarhus Convention Ratification . 1.6.Ukraine's Place in Transition towards Sustainable Development . 2. Environmental Management . 2.1. Activities of State Authorities . 2.2 Activities of State Control Authorities . 2.3. Environmental Monitoring System . 2.4. State Environmental Expertise . 2.5. Activities of Local Administrations in the Field of Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Country Office
    Ukraine Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report No. 2/2021 UNICEF/2021/Filippov Situation in Numbers Reporting Period: 1 January – 30 June 2021 Highlights 510,000 children in need of Following a relative calm second half of 2020, ceasefire violations notably intensified in the first half of 2021, with significant deterioration of the overall security situation. Until May 1, the humanitarian assistance UN recorded 39 civilian casualties which was 22 per cent higher than the previous four months (32 casualties). Active armed clashes along the Line of Contact (LoC) also resulted in damages to schools and health facility. As a result, the humanitarian community, including UNICEF, 3,400,000 people launched a contingency plan to prepare for any possible escalation. in need (HRP, Jan 2021) The COVID-19 pandemic continued to generate an additional burden on the economy and healthcare services. From March to June, Ukraine experienced a third wave of the pandemic outbreak, resulting in strict lockdowns across the country and in some parts of eastern Ukraine. 189,000 Ukraine’s national vaccination campaign remained slow, with less than two million of its adult Internally displaced people in population being fully vaccinated as of 29 July. The access to the non-government-controlled need (IDPs, HRP, Jan 2021) areas (NGCA) remained a major challenge for the humanitarian community from the start of the pandemic. In the first half of 2021, UNICEF received USD 9 million, out of a USD 14.7 million appeal. The health, education and HIV/AIDS programmes remain largely under-funded. UNICEF Appeal 2021 US$ 14.7 million UNICEF’s Response and Funding Status Funding status 68% Funding status 100% Funding status 100% Funding status 69% Funding status 31% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs The ongoing hostilities continued to affect schools and hospitals along the Line of Conflict (LoC) in eastern Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Kharkiv Luhansk Zaporizhzhia South Donetsk Dnipropetrovsk Ukraine
    Ukraine: Shelter Severity Scale: HSM November - December 2014 Total population of assessed raions (2014): ShelterSeverity Score 8,855,539 Oblast Raion Shelter Sumy Dnipropetrovs k Dniprodzerzhyns k 5 Number of assessed raions: Dnipropetrovs k Dnipropetrovs k 4 61 Dnipropetrovs k Mezhivs kyi 0 Kharkivskyi Dnipropetrovs k Mаrhаnets 2 Dnipropetrovs k Nikopols kyi 2 Kharkiv Pechenizkyi Dnipropetrovs k Novomos kovs k 5 Novopskovskyi Troitskyi Dnipropetrovs k Pаvlohrаd 3 Chuhuiv Donets k Artemivs k 5 Donets k Artemivs kyi 4 Donets k Donets k 3 Chuhuivskyi Bilokurakynskyi Zmiivskyi Donets k Druzhkivkа 3 Markivskyi Donets k Kos tiantynivаk 3 Poltava Donets k Kos tiantynivs kyi 3 Svativskyi Luhansk Milovskyi Donets k Krаmаtors k 3 Donets k Krаs noаrmiis kyi 4 Balakliiskyi Borivskyi Donets k Krаs nyi Lymаn 4 Starobilskyi Kreminskyi Bilovodskyi Donets k Mаkiivkа 4 Donets k Mаrins kyi 3 Kharkiv Donets k Mаriupol 2 Iziumskyi Krasnyi Novoaidarskyi Donets k Novoаzovs kyi 5 Lyman Rubizhne Donets k Pers hotаrvnevyi 3 Lozivskyi Sievierodonetsk Donets k Slovians k 4 Barvinkivskyi Slovianskyi Stanychno- Donets k Slovians kyi 4 Luhanskyi Sloviansk Donets k Volnovаs kyi 4 Donets k Volodаrs kyi 3 Artemivskyi Popasnianskyi Blyzniuk- Khаrkiv Blyzniukivs kyi 1 ivskyi Kramatorsk Pervomaisk Khаrkiv Borivs kyi 2 Kirovo- Luhansk Druzhkivka Artemivsk Stakhanov Khаrkiv Bаlаkliis kyi 3 hrad Novomoskovsk Khаrkiv Bаrvinkivs kyi 2 Kostiantynivka Alchevsk Khаrkiv Chuhuiv 2 Khаrkiv Chuhuivs kyi 2 Dniprodzerzhynsk Pavlohrad Kostiantynivskyi Dnipropetrovsk Khаrkiv Iziums kyi
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Nas of Ukraine Archaeology
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF UKRAINE • INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY NAS OF UKRAINE ARCHAEOLOGY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL – FOUNDED IN 1947 KYIV FREqUENCY: qUARTERLY 2 2019 Editor-in-Chief CHABAI V.P., Corresponding Members of the NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Deputy editor-in Chief TOLOCHKO P.P., Academician of the NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Executive Secretary GAVRYLYUK N.O., DSc in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine Editorial Board BOLTRYK Yu.V., PhD in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine BOROFFKA N., Professor, Dr. Hab., German Archaeological Institute, Germany BRAUND D., Professor, Dr. Hab., University of Exeter, UK BRUYAKO I.V., DSc in History,Odessa Archaeological Museum of the NAS of Ukraine BUISKIKH A.V. , DSc in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine CHOCHOROWSKI J., Professor, Dr. Hab., Institute of Archaeology of Jagiellonian University, Poland DJINDJIAN F., Professor, Dr. Hab., Professor of the University of Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, France IVAKIN V.G., PhD in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine IVANCHIK A.I. Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, National Center for Scientific Research of France FORNASIER J. Professor, doctor. Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Germany KAIZER E., Professor, Dr. Hab., Free University of Berlin, Germany KORVIN-PIOTROVSKI O.G., PhD in History, Institute of Archaeology of the NAS of Ukraine
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Economic Development Program in Eastern Ukraine
    REPORT TO USAID/KYIV REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN EASTERN UKRAINE USAID CONTRACT NO.: 121-C-00-00-00832-00 FINAL REPORT Submitted by: Mendez England & Associates 5550 Friendship Blvd., Suite 230 Chevy Chase, MD 20815-7201 USA Subcontractors: The Urban Institute Washington, D.C. Kharkiv Management Consulting Int’l Kharkiv, Ukraine Regional Economic Development Mendez England & Associates Program in Eastern Ukraine FINAL REPORT Regional Economic Development Program in Eastern Ukraine Contract No: 121-C-00-00-00832-00 October, 2000 – November, 2002 ______________________ Note: This report is supplemented by copies of materials developed during the project recorded on a CDROM that accompanies the report. The CDROM materials are referenced in the report and illustrate in depth, the activities which took place to implement the contract, training guides, results obtained, observations and conclusions drawn from the project. Overview and history of the project The contract was implemented in three phases. Phase I from October 2000 - March 2001; Phase II from April 2001 – March 2002, and Phase III from April 2002 – November 2002. During Phase I, effort was made to implement the original project as called for by the terms of the contract signed by ME&A. This implementation involved two major subcontractors, The Urban Institute (Washington DC) and Kharkiv Management Consulting International (KMCI), located in Kharkiv. The goal of the original project, Phase I, was to draft a regional strategic plan to develop promising sectors of the Kharkiv regional economy. The work plan envisioned assessing the regional economy and identifying those sectors that could be the major drivers of regional economic development over the next 3-10 years.
    [Show full text]