DOCSLIB.ORG

Fault Tectonics in the Rapid Depression of the Yukon North Slope (Canadian Arctic) - Summary of Preliminary Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fault Tectonics in the Rapid Depression of the Yukon North Slope (Canadian Arctic) - Summary of Preliminary Results Fault tectonics in the Rapid depression of the Yukon North Slope (Canadian Arctic) - Summary of preliminary results W. von Gosen1 Geozentrum Nordbayern, Krustendynamik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg K. Piepjohn Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR), Geologie der Energierohstoffe, Polargeologie D.C. Murphy Yukon Geological Survey C. Brandes Institut für Geologie, Leibniz Universität Hannover W.C. McClelland Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Iowa M. Colpron Yukon Geological Survey von Gosen, W., Piepjohn, K., Murphy, D.C., Brandes, C., McClelland, W.C. and Colpron, M., 2015. Fault tectonics in the Rapid depression of the Yukon North Slope (Canadian Arctic) – Summary of preliminary results. In: Yukon Exploration and Geology 2014, K.E. MacFarlane, M.G. Nordling and P.J. Sack (eds.), Yukon Geological Survey, p. 157-165. ABSTRACT Mesozoic to Tertiary rocks in the Rapid depression on the Yukon North Slope are dissected by a N-NNE striking fault array. Two phases of Tertiary deformation are recorded from the Barn uplift eastwardly across the Rapid depression. D1 is characterized by strike-slip faults with either sinistral or dextral displacement in the depression and reverse-dextral oblique displacement on the southern Barn fault, indicating broadly E-W regional contraction. In contrast, D2 deformation is somewhat more complex with first-order faults in the Rapid depression inferred to be primarily sinistral, while the southern Barn fault maintained its reverse-dextral oblique displacement. The structural style is inconsistent with the propagation of a large-scale strike-slip fault zone such as the Kaltag fault through the Rapid depression, as previously suggested, but rather may indicate reactivation of older structural heterogeneity in the subsurface. [email protected] YUKON EXPLORATION AND GEOLOGY 2014 157 YUKON GEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTRODUCTION predominantly underlain by Mesozoic sedimentary rocks. It is flanked to the west by structural culminations of the In northernmost Yukon (Canadian Arctic), south of the Barn and Romanzof uplifts and to the east by the Aklavik Beaufort Sea, there is a wide area known as the Yukon arch complex (including Rat, Scho, White and Cache North Slope. The Rapid depression (Fig. 1), in the Creek uplifts; Fig. 1; Norris, 1997); Paleozoic and locally eastern part of the Yukon North Slope, is a broad trough older rocks are exposed in both regions. Mesozoic rocks of the Rapid depression 70°N 70°N 141°W 132°W straddle the boundary between the Paleozoic B e a u f o r t S e a North American continental Kugmallit margin in the east and Arctic Bay ELFZ 1 Alaska terrane in the west. Mackenzie 21 Tuktoyaktuk Alaska Yukon Bay Mesozoic and locally Tertiary British 2Mountains rocks in the depression are cut by a swarm of N-~NNE BF striking faults which occur ELFZ 13 in a north-south corridor 1 Mackenzie BeF BF Delta ~60 km wide (Rapid fault 4 GF EF CI F Inuvik array; see Norris and BuF 8 HF YSF Yorath, 1981; Norris, 1997). 3 CnF 12 1 CCF 11 CCF Mackenzie BuF 7 FCF 9 11 U. S.A. KF Canada Old Crow 10 Richardson Mountains TF YF DLF Arctic Red River River 5 6 Northwest Territories Yukon DF TF 20 16 17 YF KnF PorcupineEagle River Arctic Circle DIF Plain YF Highway TF Ogilvie Mountains Dempster 14 DF Nahoni Range 18 15 TF 19 YF 15 DIF Figure 1. Tectonic elements 100 km KnF 141°W 132°W and main faults in northern 65°N 65°N Yukon and adjacent Boundary between Strike-slip fault Contraction fault Extension fault tectonic elements Northwest Territories, Canada (map modified from Norris, Tectonic Elements: Faults: 1 - Rapid depression 12 - Campbell uplift BF - Barn fault FCF - Fish Creek fault 1997). Frame with yellow fill 2 - Romanzof uplift 13 - Eskimo Lakes block BeF - Beaver fault GF - Gilbert fault shows location of the map of 3 - Old Crow-Babbage depression 14 - Kandik basin BuF - Buckland fault HF - Hoidahl fault 4 - Barn uplift 15 - Taiga-Nahoni foldbelt CCF - Cache Creek fault KF - Kaltag fault the study area 5 - Keele block 16 - Eagle foldbelt CnF - Canoe fault KnF - Knorr fault (Fig. 3). Note that the 6 - Dave Lord uplift 17 - Richardson anticlinorium CIF - Castle fault TF - Trevor fault 7 - White uplift 18 - Bonnet Plume basin DLF - Dave Lord fault YT - Yukon fault extension of the Tertiary, 8 - Cache Creek uplift 19 - Mackenzie foldbelt DF - Deception fault YSF - Yukon (Skull) fault strike-slip Kaltag fault into 9 - Scho uplift 20 - Interior platform DIF - Deslauriers fault 10 - Rat uplift 21 - Beaufort-Mackenzie basin EF - Eagle fault Yukon is called into question 11 - Canoe depression ELFZ - Eskimo Lakes fault zone here and in Lane (1992). 158 YUKON EXPLORATION AND GEOLOGY 2014 VON GOSEN ET AL. - FAULT TECTONICS IN THE RAPID DEPRESSION OF THE YUKON NORTH SLOPE Structural information from the depression is critical to reconstructions of the Arctic (e.g., Jones, 1980; McWhae, reconstructing the nature of interactions between Arctic 1986), it appears restricted to the western and central Alaska and the northwestern North American margin in parts of Alaska (e.g., Grantz, 1966; Patton and Hoare, late Mesozoic and Tertiary. Furthermore, these data might 1968; Patton 1973; Fig. 2). Lane (1992) argued against its give insight into the plate tectonic significance of the faults along-strike continuation into northern Yukon. and related structures and answer the question of whether Deformation in the Rapid depression has been the tectonic development in the Rapid depression can characterized as a Paleocene-Eocene fold-and-thrust belt, be geometrically and kinematically linked to the Eurekan lacking regionally important strike-slip faults (Lane, 1988). deformation in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, North This belt continues northward into major fold structures Greenland and Svalbard (compare, for example, Balkwill, of the arcuate Beaufort fold-and-thrust belt offshore in the 1978; Kerr, 1981; Tessensohn and Piepjohn, 2000). southern Beaufort Sea (e.g., Lane, 1998; Fig. 2). Several interpretations of seismic lines from these offshore areas PREVIOUS WORK have shown that the arcuate belt was mainly formed during the Paleocene-Eocene but youngs towards its The Rapid depression has been inferred to be the locus outboard northern and eastern parts (compare, for of the continuation of the Kaltag fault, a major ENE-WSW example, Dietrich et al., 1989; Lane and Dietrich, 1991; dextral strike-slip fault defined in western and central Lane, 1998, 2002; Dixon et al., 2001; Dinkelman et al., Alaska (cf., Norris, 1976, 1981, 1997; Fig. 1). Although the 2008; Helwig et al., 2011). Kaltag fault has been included in Cenozoic plate tectonic 135° Anticline 150° 145° 140° Syncline 100 km Thrust Fault Beaufort Sea 70° Normal Fault Strike-Slip Fault, dextral Fault, type not defined 69° 69° Alaska Yukon 68° Eskimo Lakes Fault 68° Old Crow Basin 67° 67° Fault Kobuk Fault Yukon Knorr Fault 66° Yukon Flats 66° Bonnet Plume 65° Basin 65° Kaltag Fault Tintina Fault 155° U. S. A. S. U. Canada 135° 150° 140° Pre-mid Cretaceous to Holocene deformations: 145° Campanian and Pre-mid Cretaceous Post-mid Cretaceous Paleocene - Mid-Eocene - Late Oligocene - younger Early Eocene Oligocene Holocene Figure 2. Simplified tectonic map of northeastern Alaska, northern Yukon, and adjacent Northwest Territories (Canada) showing the trends of major Late Cretaceous-Tertiary structures and approximate ages of pre-mid Cretaceous to Holocene deformations (modified from Lane, 1998, 2002). Frame with yellow fill shows location of map in Figure 3. YUKON EXPLORATION AND GEOLOGY 2014 159 YUKON GEOLOGICAL RESEARCH GEOLOGIC SETTING OF THE RAPID (Cecile, 1988) or Middle-Late Devonian (Dyke, 1997); it is inferred to be related either to the Ellesmerian Orogeny DEPRESSION or to the Romanzof Orogeny (Lane, 2007). The Barn uplift The Barn uplift, partly bounding the western edge is bounded on the east by the Barn fault. In the north, of the Rapid depression (Figs. 1 and 3), consists of west, and south, the rocks in the uplift are unconformably Neoproterozoic to lower Paleozoic (meta-)clastic and overlain by Carboniferous and younger clastic deposits carbonate rocks intruded by granitic plutons of Late (Fig. 3). Devonian age (Lane, 2007), all part of the Arctic Alaska The Rapid depression and areas surrounding the Barn terrane. The pre-Carboniferous succession is folded and uplift are underlain by Jurassic to Upper Cretaceous, and dissected by several east-directed thrust faults (Cecile, locally Tertiary clastic deposits (Fig. 3). The eastern margin 1988; Cecile and Lane, 1991; Dyke, 1997). The first phase of the Rapid depression, in the Richardson Mountains, of deformation in the core of the Barn uplift has been consists of upper Paleozoic deposits overlain by Mesozoic interpreted as post-Late Silurian to pre-Early Carboniferous rocks in the White and Cache Creek uplifts (Figs. 1 and 3). 139° W 138° W 137° W M a c k e n z i e B a y 68° 40' N 68° 40' N Barn fault Gilbert fault Blow fault B a r n U p l i f t f i l p U n r a B Buckland fault 68° 20' N 68° 20' N Gilbert anticline Hoidahl fault 139° W Anticline Strike-slip fault Skull (Yukon) fault Gilbert fault Syncline Fault, inferred Contraction fault Fault 20 km 138° W 137° W Quaternary Upper Cretaceous and lower Tertiary Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous Jurassic Permian Late Devonian, Granite Tertiary (Paleocene) Lower and Upper Cretaceous Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous Triassic Carboniferous Proterozoic - lower Paleozoic (Porcupine River Formation) Figure 3. Simplified geological map of the Rapid depression and adjacent areas (north Yukon, Canada) modified from Norris (1981). For location see Figures 1 and 2. 160 YUKON EXPLORATION AND GEOLOGY 2014 VON GOSEN ET AL. - FAULT TECTONICS IN THE RAPID DEPRESSION OF THE YUKON NORTH SLOPE FAULTING IN THE RAPID DEPRESSION STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS From west to east the major faults in the Rapid depression RELEVANT TO FAULT KINEMATICS are as follows (Norris, 1981, 1997; Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strike and Dip Refer to the Orientation Or Attitude of a Geologic Feature. The
    Name__________________________________ 89.325 – Geology for Engineers Faults, Folds, Outcrop Patterns and Geologic Maps I. Properties of Earth Materials When rocks are subjected to differential stress the resulting build-up in strain can cause deformation. Depending on the material properties the result can either be elastic deformation which can ultimately lead to the breaking of the rock material (faults) or ductile deformation which can lead to the development of folds. In this exercise we will look at the various types of deformation and how geologists use geologic maps to understand this deformation. II. Strike and Dip Strike and dip refer to the orientation or attitude of a geologic feature. The strike line of a bed, fault, or other planar feature, is a line representing the intersection of that feature with a horizontal plane. On a geologic map, this is represented with a short straight line segment oriented parallel to the strike line. Strike (or strike angle) can be given as either a quadrant compass bearing of the strike line (N25°E for example) or in terms of east or west of true north or south, a single three digit number representing the azimuth, where the lower number is usually given (where the example of N25°E would simply be 025), or the azimuth number followed by the degree sign (example of N25°E would be 025°). The dip gives the steepest angle of descent of a tilted bed or feature relative to a horizontal plane, and is given by the number (0°-90°) as well as a letter (N, S, E, W) with rough direction in which the bed is dipping.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction San Andreas Fault: an Overview
    Introduction This volume is a general geology field guide to the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area. The first section provides a brief overview of the San Andreas Fault in context to regional California geology, the Bay Area, and earthquake history with emphasis of the section of the fault that ruptured in the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. This first section also contains information useful for discussion and making field observations associated with fault- related landforms, landslides and mass-wasting features, and the plant ecology in the study region. The second section contains field trips and recommended hikes on public lands in the Santa Cruz Mountains, along the San Mateo Coast, and at Point Reyes National Seashore. These trips provide access to the San Andreas Fault and associated faults, and to significant rock exposures and landforms in the vicinity. Note that more stops are provided in each of the sections than might be possible to visit in a day. The extra material is intended to provide optional choices to visit in a region with a wealth of natural resources, and to support discussions and provide information about additional field exploration in the Santa Cruz Mountains region. An early version of the guidebook was used in conjunction with the Pacific SEPM 2004 Fall Field Trip. Selected references provide a more technical and exhaustive overview of the fault system and geology in this field area; for instance, see USGS Professional Paper 1550-E (Wells, 2004). San Andreas Fault: An Overview The catastrophe caused by the 1906 earthquake in the San Francisco region started the study of earthquakes and California geology in earnest.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 3: Normal Faults and Extensional Tectonics
    12.113 Structural Geology Part 3: Normal faults and extensional tectonics Fall 2005 Contents 1 Reading assignment 1 2 Growth strata 1 3 Models of extensional faults 2 3.1 Listric faults . 2 3.2 Planar, rotating fault arrays . 2 3.3 Stratigraphic signature of normal faults and extension . 2 3.4 Core complexes . 6 4 Slides 7 1 Reading assignment Read Chapter 5. 2 Growth strata Although not particular to normal faults, relative uplift and subsidence on either side of a surface breaking fault leads to predictable patterns of erosion and sedi­ mentation. Sediments will fill the available space created by slip on a fault. Not only do the characteristic patterns of stratal thickening or thinning tell you about the 1 Figure 1: Model for a simple, planar fault style of faulting, but by dating the sediments, you can tell the age of the fault (since sediments were deposited during faulting) as well as the slip rates on the fault. 3 Models of extensional faults The simplest model of a normal fault is a planar fault that does not change its dip with depth. Such a fault does not accommodate much extension. (Figure 1) 3.1 Listric faults A listric fault is a fault which shallows with depth. Compared to a simple planar model, such a fault accommodates a considerably greater amount of extension for the same amount of slip. Characteristics of listric faults are that, in order to maintain geometric compatibility, beds in the hanging wall have to rotate and dip towards the fault. Commonly, listric faults involve a number of en echelon faults that sole into a low­angle master detachment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonics of the Musandam Peninsula and Northern Oman Mountains: from Ophiolite Obduction to Continental Collision
    GeoArabia, 2014, v. 19, no. 2, p. 135-174 Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain Tectonics of the Musandam Peninsula and northern Oman Mountains: From ophiolite obduction to continental collision Michael P. Searle, Alan G. Cherry, Mohammed Y. Ali and David J.W. Cooper ABSTRACT The tectonics of the Musandam Peninsula in northern Oman shows a transition between the Late Cretaceous ophiolite emplacement related tectonics recorded along the Oman Mountains and Dibba Zone to the SE and the Late Cenozoic continent-continent collision tectonics along the Zagros Mountains in Iran to the northwest. Three stages in the continental collision process have been recognized. Stage one involves the emplacement of the Semail Ophiolite from NE to SW onto the Mid-Permian–Mesozoic passive continental margin of Arabia. The Semail Ophiolite shows a lower ocean ridge axis suite of gabbros, tonalites, trondhjemites and lavas (Geotimes V1 unit) dated by U-Pb zircon between 96.4–95.4 Ma overlain by a post-ridge suite including island-arc related volcanics including boninites formed between 95.4–94.7 Ma (Lasail, V2 unit). The ophiolite obduction process began at 96 Ma with subduction of Triassic–Jurassic oceanic crust to depths of > 40 km to form the amphibolite/granulite facies metamorphic sole along an ENE- dipping subduction zone. U-Pb ages of partial melts in the sole amphibolites (95.6– 94.5 Ma) overlap precisely in age with the ophiolite crustal sequence, implying that subduction was occurring at the same time as the ophiolite was forming. The ophiolite, together with the underlying Haybi and Hawasina thrust sheets, were thrust southwest on top of the Permian–Mesozoic shelf carbonate sequence during the Late Cenomanian–Campanian.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Tectonics
    Plate Tectonics Plate Tectonics is a unifying theory that states that the Earth is composed of lithospheric crustal plates that move slowly, change size, and interact with one another. This theory was amalgamated from a variety of studies that began in the early 20th century and culminated in the 1960s. Early Players: Richard Oldham (1858-1936): discovered P Wave Shadow Zones Inge Lehmann (1888-1993): discovered the S Wave Shadow Zone, including the fact that the outer core is liquid Eduard Suess (1831-1914): published internal structure of the Earth, utilizing some of Oldham’s data Andrija Mohorovicic (1857-1936): discovered the seismic discontinuity between the crust and the mantle Beno Gutenberg (1889-1960): found the CMB to be at 2900 km The Great Synthesizer: Alfred Wagener (1880-1930) Book: The Origin of Continents and Oceans (1915) Found six major pieces of evidence the continents move, hence his theory is known as Continental Drift. (Figures 19.2-1911) 1) The shape of the continents: they fit together 2) Paleontological Evidence: found matching fossils on several continents a) Glossopteris: found in rocks of the same age on South America, South Africa, Australia, India and Antarctica b) Lystrosaurus: found in rocks of the same age on Africa, India, also some in Asia and Antarctica c) Mesosaurus: found in rocks of the same age on South America, South Africa d) Cynognathus: found in rocks of the same age on South America, South Africa 3) Glacial Evidence: the glaciers appear to originate from the modern-day oceans (which is impossible) 4) Structure and Rock Type: geologic features end on one continent and reappear on the other (South America and Africa) 5) Paleoclimate Zones: like today, the old Earth had climate zones.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JOURNAL of GEOLOGY March 1990
    VOLUME 98 NUMBER 2 THE JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY March 1990 QUANTITATIVE FILLING MODEL FOR CONTINENTAL EXTENSIONAL BASINS WITH APPLICATIONS TO EARLY MESOZOIC RIFTS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA' ROY W. SCHLISCHE AND PAUL E. OLSEN Department of Geological Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964 ABSTRACT In many half-graben, strata progressively onlap the hanging wall block of the basins, indicating that both the basins and their depositional surface areas were growing in size through time. Based on these con- straints, we have constructed a quantitative model for the stratigraphic evolution of extensional basins with the simplifying assumptions of constant volume input of sediments and water per unit time, as well as a uniform subsidence rate and a fixed outlet level. The model predicts (1) a transition from fluvial to lacustrine deposition, (2) systematically decreasing accumulation rates in lacustrine strata, and (3) a rapid increase in lake depth after the onset of lacustrine deposition, followed by a systematic decrease. When parameterized for the early Mesozoic basins of eastern North America, the model's predictions match trends observed in late Triassic-age rocks. Significant deviations from the model's predictions occur in Early Jurassic-age strata, in which markedly higher accumulation rates and greater lake depths point to an increased extension rate that led to increased asymmetry in these half-graben. The model makes it possible to extract from the sedimentary record those events in the history of an extensional basin that are due solely to the filling of a basin growing in size through time and those that are due to changes in tectonics, climate, or sediment and water budgets.
    [Show full text]
  • Faults and Joints
    133 JOINTS Joints (also termed extensional fractures) are planes of separation on which no or undetectable shear displacement has taken place. The two walls of the resulting tiny opening typically remain in tight (matching) contact. Joints may result from regional tectonics (i.e. the compressive stresses in front of a mountain belt), folding (due to curvature of bedding), faulting, or internal stress release during uplift or cooling. They often form under high fluid pressure (i.e. low effective stress), perpendicular to the smallest principal stress. The aperture of a joint is the space between its two walls measured perpendicularly to the mean plane. Apertures can be open (resulting in permeability enhancement) or occluded by mineral cement (resulting in permeability reduction). A joint with a large aperture (> few mm) is a fissure. The mechanical layer thickness of the deforming rock controls joint growth. If present in sufficient number, open joints may provide adequate porosity and permeability such that an otherwise impermeable rock may become a productive fractured reservoir. In quarrying, the largest block size depends on joint frequency; abundant fractures are desirable for quarrying crushed rock and gravel. Joint sets and systems Joints are ubiquitous features of rock exposures and often form families of straight to curviplanar fractures typically perpendicular to the layer boundaries in sedimentary rocks. A set is a group of joints with similar orientation and morphology. Several sets usually occur at the same place with no apparent interaction, giving exposures a blocky or fragmented appearance. Two or more sets of joints present together in an exposure compose a joint system.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Features of the Precambrian Belt Basin and Their Influence on Post-Belt Structures
    ... Tectonic Features of the .., Precambrian Belt Basin and Their Influence on Post-Belt Structures GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 866 · Tectonic Features of the · Precambrian Belt Basin and Their Influence on Post-Belt Structures By JACK E. HARRISON, ALLAN B. GRIGGS, and JOHN D. WELLS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER X66 U N IT ED STATES G 0 V ERN M EN T P R I NT I N G 0 F F I C E, \VAS H I N G T 0 N 19 7 4 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-600111 ) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. GO\·ernment Printing Office 'Vashington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents (paper cO\·er) Stock Number 2401-02554 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract................................................. 1 Phanerozoic events-Continued Introduction . 1 Late Mesozoic through early Tertiary-Continued Genesis and filling of the Belt basin . 1 Idaho batholith ................................. 7 Is the Belt basin an aulacogen? . 5 Boulder batholith ............................... 8 Precambrian Z events . 5 Northern Montana disturbed belt ................. 8 Phanerozoic events . 5 Tectonics along the Lewis and Clark line .............. 9 Paleozoic through early Mesozoic . 6 Late Cenozoic block faults ........................... 13 Late Mesozoic through early Tertiary . 6 Conclusions ............................................. 13 Kootenay arc and mobile belt . 6 References cited ......................................... 14 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURES 1-4. Maps: 1. Principal basins of sedimentation along the U.S.-Canadian Cordillera during Precambrian Y time (1,600-800 m.y. ago) ............................................................................................... 2 2. Principal tectonic elements of the Belt basin reentrant as inferred from the sedimentation record ............
    [Show full text]
  • Gy403 Structural Geology Kinematic Analysis Kinematics
    GY403 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY KINEMATIC ANALYSIS KINEMATICS • Translation- described by a vector quantity • Rotation- described by: • Axis of rotation point • Magnitude of rotation (degrees) • Sense of rotation (reference frame; clockwise or anticlockwise) • Dilation- volume change • Loss of volume = negative dilation • Increase of volume = positive dilation • Distortion- change in original shape RIGID VS. NON-RIGID BODY DEFORMATION • Rigid Body Deformation • Translation: fault slip • Rotation: rotational fault • Non-rigid Body Deformation • Dilation: burial of sediment/rock • Distortion: ductile deformation (permanent shape change) TRANSLATION EXAMPLES • Slip along a planar fault • 360 meters left lateral slip • 50 meters normal dip slip • Classification: normal left-lateral slip fault 30 Net Slip Vector X(S) 40 70 N 50m dip slip X(N) 360m strike slip 30 40 0 100m ROTATIONAL FAULT • Fault slip is described by an axis of rotation • Rotation is anticlockwise as viewed from the south fault block • Amount of rotation is 50 degrees Axis W E 50 FAULT SEPARATION VS. SLIP • Fault separation: the apparent slip as viewed on a planar outcrop. • Fault slip: must be measured with net slip vector using a linear feature offset by the fault. 70 40 150m D U 40 STRAIN ELLIPSOID X • A three-dimensional ellipsoid that describes the magnitude of dilational and distortional strain. • Assume a perfect sphere before deformation. • Three mutually perpendicular axes X, Y, and Z. • X is maximum stretch (S ) and Z is minimum stretch (S ). X Z Y Z • There are unique directions
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-African Orogeny 1
    Encyclopedia 0f Geology (2004), vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam AFRICA/Pan-African Orogeny 1 Contents Pan-African Orogeny North African Phanerozoic Rift Valley Within the Pan-African domains, two broad types of Pan-African Orogeny orogenic or mobile belts can be distinguished. One type consists predominantly of Neoproterozoic supracrustal and magmatic assemblages, many of juvenile (mantle- A Kröner, Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany R J Stern, University of Texas-Dallas, Richardson derived) origin, with structural and metamorphic his- TX, USA tories that are similar to those in Phanerozoic collision and accretion belts. These belts expose upper to middle O 2005, Elsevier Ltd. All Rights Reserved. crustal levels and contain diagnostic features such as ophiolites, subduction- or collision-related granitoids, lntroduction island-arc or passive continental margin assemblages as well as exotic terranes that permit reconstruction of The term 'Pan-African' was coined by WQ Kennedy in their evolution in Phanerozoic-style plate tectonic scen- 1964 on the basis of an assessment of available Rb-Sr arios. Such belts include the Arabian-Nubian shield of and K-Ar ages in Africa. The Pan-African was inter- Arabia and north-east Africa (Figure 2), the Damara- preted as a tectono-thermal event, some 500 Ma ago, Kaoko-Gariep Belt and Lufilian Arc of south-central during which a number of mobile belts formed, sur- and south-western Africa, the West Congo Belt of rounding older cratons. The concept was then extended Angola and Congo Republic, the Trans-Sahara Belt of to the Gondwana continents (Figure 1) although West Africa, and the Rokelide and Mauretanian belts regional names were proposed such as Brasiliano along the western Part of the West African Craton for South America, Adelaidean for Australia, and (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Penokean Orogeny in the Lake Superior Region Klaus J
    Precambrian Research 157 (2007) 4–25 The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region Klaus J. Schulz ∗, William F. Cannon U.S. Geological Survey, 954 National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA Received 16 March 2006; received in revised form 1 September 2006; accepted 5 February 2007 Abstract The Penokean orogeny began at about 1880 Ma when an oceanic arc, now the Pembine–Wausau terrane, collided with the southern margin of the Archean Superior craton marking the end of a period of south-directed subduction. The docking of the buoyant craton to the arc resulted in a subduction jump to the south and development of back-arc extension both in the initial arc and adjacent craton margin to the north. A belt of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits formed in the extending back-arc rift within the arc. Synchronous extension and subsidence of the Superior craton resulted in a broad shallow sea characterized by volcanic grabens (Menominee Group in northern Michigan). The classic Lake Superior banded iron-formations, including those in the Marquette, Gogebic, Mesabi and Gunflint Iron Ranges, formed in that sea. The newly established subduction zone caused continued arc volcanism until about 1850 Ma when a fragment of Archean crust, now the basement of the Marshfield terrane, arrived at the subduction zone. The convergence of Archean blocks of the Superior and Marshfield cratons resulted in the major contractional phase of the Penokean orogeny. Rocks of the Pembine–Wausau arc were thrust northward onto the Superior craton causing subsidence of a foreland basin in which sedimentation began at about 1850 Ma in the south (Baraga Group rocks) and 1835 Ma in the north (Rove and Virginia Formations).
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Orogeny
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 PROCESSES OF COLLISION OROGENY Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia a young collision zone J.F. Dewey, M.R. Hempton, W.S.F. Kidd, F. Saroglu & A.M.C. ~eng6r SUMMARY: We use the tectonics of Eastern Anatolia to exemplify many of the different aspects of collision tectonics, namely the formation of plateaux, thrust belts, foreland flexures, widespread foreland/hinterland deformation zones and orogenic collapse/distension zones. Eastern Anatolia is a 2 km high plateau bounded to the S by the southward-verging Bitlis Thrust Zone and to the N by the Pontide/Minor Caucasus Zone. It has developed as the surface expression of a zone of progressively thickening crust beginning about 12 Ma in the medial Miocene and has resulted from the squeezing and shortening of Eastern Anatolia between the Arabian and European Plates following the Serravallian demise of the last oceanic or quasi- oceanic tract between Arabia and Eurasia. Thickening of the crust to about 52 km has been accompanied by major strike-slip faulting on the rightqateral N Anatolian Transform Fault (NATF) and the left-lateral E Anatolian Transform Fault (EATF) which approximately bound an Anatolian Wedge that is being driven westwards to override the oceanic lithosphere of the Mediterranean along subduction zones from Cephalonia to Crete, and Rhodes to Cyprus. This neotectonic regime began about 12 Ma in Late Serravallian times with uplift from wide- spread littoral/neritic marine conditions to open seasonal wooded savanna with coiluvial, fluvial and limnic environments, and the deposition of the thick Tortonian Kythrean Flysch in the Eastern Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]