<<

Community Review 2013/14

Review of the Boundary and Electoral Arrangements within the of

DRAFT PROPOSALS – APPENDIX B ()

ABERAVON COMMUNTIY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Aberavon Community. However, the Electoral Registration Officer would like to propose the following change:

 CR001 – Creation of a new community of Moors

Submission review: CR001 – Creation of a new community of Baglan Moors Upon review by the Electoral Services Team, it was identified that the area commonly referred to as ‘Old Aberavon’ is distinct from the newer housing developments on ‘Baglan Moors’. It can be viewed that the two areas are physically separated by a dual carriage way, connected only by a small corridor of land. The two areas are clearly distinct communities in their own right with little in common in respect of their needs and aspirations. Baglan Moors is relatively affluent whilst Aberavon has high levels of deprivation. It is therefore recommended that a draft proposal be made to create a new community of Baglan Moors.

Rejected Submissions None rejected

BAGLAN COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Baglan Community.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected

BAGLAN BAY COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Community.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected

1 Community.Review.2013/14_Draft.Proposals.AppxB

BRITON FERRY COMMUNITY COUNCIL (Craig‐Y‐Darren, Cwrt Sart, Brynhyfryd & Shelone Wood Communities)

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the communities of Craig‐Y‐Darren, Cwrt Sart, Brynhyfyrd & Shelone Wood.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected

BRYN COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Bryn Community.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected

CWMAVON COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Cwmavon Community.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected

COEDFFRANC COMMUNTIY COUNCIL

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the communities of Central, Coedffranc East Central, , & Coedffranc West Central.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejeceted

2 Community.Review.2013/14_Draft.Proposals.AppxB

GLYNCORRWG COMMUNITY (Cymmer, & Communities)

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the communities of Cymmer, Glyncorrwg & Gwynfi.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected

MARGAM COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Community. However, the Electoral Registration Officer would like to propose the following change:

 CR005 – Creation of a New Community of Margam Village

Submission review: CR005 – Creation of a New Community of Margam Village Upon review by the Electoral Services Team, it was identified that the area of Margam (situated around the TATA Steelworks Plant) is distinct from the newer housing developments in Margam Village and Lakeside areas. It can be viewed that the two areas are physically separated by the M4 Motorway and new Harbour Way road development, connected only by a small corridor of land. The two areas are clearly distinct communities in their own right with little in common in respect of their needs and aspirations. Margam Village and Lakeside are affluent whilst Margam has higher levels of deprivation in comparison. It is therefore recommended that a draft proposal be made to create a new community of Margam Village.

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected.

MARGAM MOORS COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Community.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected.

3 Community.Review.2013/14_Draft.Proposals.AppxB

PORT TALBOT COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Port Talbot Community.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected

SANDFIELDS EAST COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received that could be considered for this specific review exercise in relation to the Community.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) Submission Review: Creation of Sandfields Community Council One submission was received requesting that a new Community Council be created which would combine both the Sandfields East and Communities. This submission could not be taken forward as this review is not the appropriate mechanism for taking the proposal forward. Furthermore, no additional submissions were received in relation to this suggestion.

SANDFIELDS WEST COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received that could be considered for this specific review exercise in relation to the Sandfields West Community.

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) Submission Review: Creation of Sandfields Community Council One submission was received requesting that a new Community Council be created which would combine both the Sandfields East and Sandfields West Communities. This submission could not be taken forward as this review is not the appropriate mechanism for taking the proposal forward. Furthermore, no additional submissions were received in relation to this suggestion.

4 Community.Review.2013/14_Draft.Proposals.AppxB

TAI‐BACH COMMUNITY

Draft Proposals No submissions were received regarding the Tai‐Bach Commuity

Proposal: No Change

Rejected Submissions 1) None rejected.

5 Community.Review.2013/14_Draft.Proposals.AppxB