DOCSLIB.ORG

Emily Barman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Emily Barman EMILY BARMAN Department of Sociology (857) 928-2792 (Cell) Boston University (617) 358-0651 (Office) 100 Cummington Mall (617) 353-4837 (Fax) Boston, MA 02215 [email protected] EMPLOYMENT 2018- Professor, Sociology, Boston University 2017- Associate Dean, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences, Boston University 2009 Associate Professor, Sociology, Boston University 2002 Assistant Professor, Sociology, Boston University Visiting Positions 2012 Visiting Fellow, Accounting, London School of Economics 2010 Visiting Scholar, Social and Political Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra EDUCATION 2002 Ph.D., Sociology, University of Chicago 1994 M.A., Sociology, University of Chicago 1991 B.A., History and Sociology, University of British Columbia PUBLICATIONS Books Barman, Emily. 2016. Caring Capitalism: The Meaning and Measure of Social Value. Cambridge University Press 2018 Virginia A. Hodgkinson Book Prize, Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action 2017 Best Book Award, Public and Nonprofit Division, Academy of Management Reviewed in American Journal of Sociology, British Journal of Sociology, Contemporary Sociology, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, and Voluntas Barman, Emily. 2006. Contesting Communities: The Transformation of Workplace Charity. Stanford University Press 2007 Skystone Ryan Annual Prize for Best Research on Fundraising and Philanthropy, Association of Fundraising Professionals Reviewed in American Journal of Sociology, Community Development Journal, Contemporary Sociology, Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Philanthropy News Digest, and Work and Occupations Articles and Book Chapters Barman, Emily. Forthcoming. “Many a Slip: Impact as Boundary Object in Social Finance.” Historical Social Research. Barman, Emily. 2018. “Doing Well by Doing Good: A Comparative Analysis of ESG Standards for Responsible Investment.” Advances in Strategic Management 38:289-312. Barman, Emily. 2017. “The Social Bases of Philanthropy.” Annual Review of Sociology 43(22):1-20. Barman, Emily. 2016. “Varieties of Field Theory and the Sociology of the Nonprofit Sector.” Sociology Compass 10(6):442-458. ` Barman, Emily. 2015. “Of Principal and Principle: Value Plurality in the Market of Impact Investing.” Valuation Studies 3(1):9-44. Hall, Matthew, Yuval Millo, and Emily Barman. 2015. “Who and What Really Counts? Stakeholder Prioritization and Accounting For Social Value.” Journal of Management Studies 52(7):907-934. Olafsdottir, Sigrun, Elyas Bakhtiari, and Emily Barman. 2014. “Public or Private? The Role of the State and Civil Society in Health and Health Inequalities Across Nations.” Social Science and Medicine 10:174-181. Barman, Emily. 2013. “Classificatory Struggles in the Nonprofit Sector: The Formation of the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities, 1969-1987.” Social Science History 37(1):103-141. MacIndoe, Heather and Emily Barman. 2013. “How Organizational Stakeholders Shape Performance Measurement in Nonprofits: Exploring A Multidimensional Measure.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 42(4):716-738. Barman, Emily and Heather MacIndoe. 2012. “Organizational Capacity, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The Case of Outcome Measurement.” Sociological Forum 27(1):70-93. Barman, Emily. 2008. “Organizational Genesis in the Nonprofit Sector: An Analysis of Demand, Supply, and Community Characteristics.” International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior 11(1):40-63. Barman, Emily. 2008. “With Strings Attached: Nonprofits’ Adoption of Donor Choice.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31(1):39-56. Barman, Emily. 2007. “An Institutional Approach to Donor Control: From Dyadic Ties to a Field-Level Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 112(5):1416-1457. Barman, Emily. 2007. “What is the Bottom Line for Nonprofit Organizations? A History of Measurement in the British Voluntary Sector.” Voluntas 18(2):101-115. Barman, Emily and Mark Chaves. 2005. “Strategy and Restructure at the United Church of Christ.” Pp. 466-492 in Church, Identity and Change: Theology and Denominational Structures in Unsettled Times, edited by David A. Roozen and James Nieman. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Barman, Emily. 2002. “Asserting Difference: The Strategic Response of Nonprofit Organizations to Competition.” Social Forces 80(4):1191-1222. Barman, Emily and Mark Chaves. 2001. “Lessons for Multi-Site Nonprofits from the United Church of Christ.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 11(3):339-352. Chaves, Mark, Mary Ellen Konieczny, Kraig Beyerlein, and Emily Barman. 1999. “The National Congregations Study: Background, Methods, and Selected Results.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 38(4):458-76. Abbott, Andrew and Emily Barman. 1997. “Sequence Comparison via Alignment and Gibbs Sampling: A Formal Analysis of the Emergence of the Modern Sociological Article.” Sociological Methodology 27:47-89. Research Reports, Book Reviews, and Other Publications Barman, Emily. 2019. Book review of The Politics of Value: Three Movements to Change How We Think About the Economy. American Journal of Sociology 125(2). Barman, Emily. 2017. “The Sociology of Voluntary Associations.” The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hall, Matthew, Yuval Millo, and Emily Barman. 2016. “What Influences Managers’ Ability To Record And Report On Non-Financial Capitals? The Case of Social Return on Investment.” ICAEW Technical Report. https://www.icaew.com/~/media/corporate/files/technical/sustainability/ rethinking%20capitals/tecpln149272%20hall%20milo.ashx. Millo, Yuval, Emily Barman, and Matthew Hall. 2016. “Accounting Measurement Tools and their Impact on Managerial Decision Making.” Economic Sociology-The European Electronic Newsletter 17(2):17-23. http://econsoc.mpifg.de/downloads/17_2/Millo_17-2.pdf. Barman 2 ` Barman, Emily. 2015. Book review of The Paradox of Generosity: Giving We Receive, Grasping We Lose by Christian Smith and Hilary Davidson. American Journal of Sociology 121(2):636-638. MacIndoe, Heather and Emily Barman. 2009. Partnerships and Performance: The State of the Boston Nonprofit Sector. Boston: University of Massachusetts Boston Research Report Series. Barman, Emily. 2006. Book review of Unequal Partnerships: Beyond the Rhetoric of Philanthropic Collaboration by Ira Silver. American Journal of Sociology 112:938-939. Barman, Emily and Alya Guseva. 2005. “What a Weberian Approach to Interests Can Contribute to Economic Sociology: A Review Essay.” Theory and Society 34(1):93-103. Barman, Emily. 2000. Book review of Congregations in Conflict: Cultural Models of Local Religious Life by Penny E. Becker. Social Forces 78:1589-1591. WORK IN PROGRESS OR UNDER REVIEW Barman, Emily. “Hinges, Legitimacy, and Linked Ecologies: Theorizing the Centralization of Charity in the United States.” In progress Barman, Emily. “Just Good Business: Theorizing Survival for Health Enterprises.” In progress Barman, Emily, Matthew Hall, and Yuval Millo. “Demonstrating Value: The Role of Accounting Practices in Legitimating Innovations.” Revise and resubmit, European Accounting Review Barman, Emily and Heather MacIndoe. “The Bigger the Better: Niche Width and Resource Acquisition in the Nonprofit Sector.” In progress AWARDS, FELLOWSHIPS, AND HONORS 2018 Virginia A. Hodgkinson Book Prize, Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action 2017 Best Book Award, Public and Nonprofit Division, Academy of Management 2014 Collaborative Research Grant, Boston University ($5,000) 2013 Morris Fund Faculty Research Award, Boston University ($4,000) 2008 Boston Area Nonprofits Study, Boston Foundation ($22,000) 2008 Chair’s Grant, Boston University ($9,000) 2007 Skystone Ryan Annual Prize for Best Research on Fundraising and Philanthropy, Association of Fundraising Professionals 2006 American Sociological Association/National Science Foundation Fund for the Advancement of the Discipline Research Grant ($5,000) 2000 National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant ($6,000) 2000 Aspen Institute Nonprofit Sector Research Fund Dissertation Fellowship ($18,000) 2000 Indiana University and Aspen Institute Doctoral Seminar Participant INVITED LECTURES 2018 “Towards Hybrid Organizing: Theorizing Success for Social Enterprises.” Organizations and Social Change Seminar, College of Management, University of Massachusetts Boston 2018 “Just Good Business: Theorizing Hybrid Success,” Faculty of Liberal Arts, Sophia University 2018 “Secrets of Success for Health Innovation,” LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas 2018 “Just Good Business: Making Sense of Success for Health Enterprises,” Philanthropy Research Workshop, Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Barman 3 ` 2017 “Doing Good & Doing Well: Theorizing Value in Impact Investing.” Presidential Panel, “The New Philanthropy as Social Investment: Theorizing the Philanthrocapitalist Turn,” ASA Annual Meeting 2017 “Taking Appropriate Measures: Performance Measurement for Social Enterprise,” Department of Sociology, Brown University 2017 “For Good Measure: The Challenge of Performance Measurement for Social Enterprises,” School of Public Policy, University of Maryland 2016 “Doing Good and Doing Well: Economic Valuation in Moral Markets.” Harvard-MIT Economic Sociology Seminar Series 2015 “Caring Capitalism: Understanding the Construction and Configuration of Moral Markets.” Center for Globalisation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dynamic Social Network Analysis: Present Roots and Future Fruits
    Dynamic Social Network Analysis: Present Roots and Future Fruits Ms. Nancy K Hayden Project Leader Defense Threat Reduction Agency Advanced Systems and Concepts Office Stephen P. Borgatti, Ronald L. Breiger, Peter Brooks, George B. Davis, David S. Dornisch, Jeffrey Johnson, Mark Mizruchi, Elizabeth Warner July 2009 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY •ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND CONCEPTS OFFICE REPORT NUMBER ASCO 2009 009 The mission of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) is to safeguard America and its allies from weapons of mass destruction (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high explosives) by providing capabilities to reduce, eliminate, and counter the threat, and mitigate its effects. The Advanced Systems and Concepts Office (ASCO) supports this mission by providing long-term rolling horizon perspectives to help DTRA leadership identify, plan, and persuasively communicate what is needed in the near term to achieve the longer-term goals inherent in the agency’s mission. ASCO also emphasizes the identification, integration, and further development of leading strategic thinking and analysis on the most intractable problems related to combating weapons of mass destruction. For further information on this project, or on ASCO’s broader research program, please contact: Defense Threat Reduction Agency Advanced Systems and Concepts Office 8725 John J. Kingman Road Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-6201 [email protected] Or, visit our website: http://www.dtra.mil/asco/ascoweb/index.htm Dynamic Social Network Analysis: Present Roots and Future Fruits Ms. Nancy K. Hayden Project Leader Defense Threat Reduction Agency Advanced Systems and Concepts Office and Stephen P. Borgatti, Ronald L. Breiger, Peter Brooks, George B. Davis, David S.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae YANJIE BIAN (Updated January 2015)
    Curriculum Vitae YANJIE BIAN (Updated January 2015) U.S. CONTACT INFORMATION Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, 267 19th Ave South, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Tel: (612) 624-9554; Fax: (612) 624-7020 Email: [email protected] CHINA CONTACT INFORMATION School of Humanities and Social Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 28 West Xian Ning Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China. Tel: (86-29) 8266-9178/Fax: (86-29) 8266-8281 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION 1990 Ph.D. in sociology, State University of New York at Albany. Thesis: “Work-Unit Structure and Status Attainment: A Study of Work-Unit Status in Urban China,” Advisor: Professor Nan Lin 1984 M.A. in sociology, Nankai University, China. Thesis: “Single-Child Family and Its Socioeconomic Implications,” Advisor: Professor Zelin Wu 1982 B.A. in philosophy, Nankai University, China EMPLOYMENT University of Minnesota, Department of Sociology 2006- Professor of Sociology On sabbatical leave (2009-2010) & unpaid leave (fall 2012) 1991-2000 Assistant (1991-97) and Associate (1997-2000) Professor of Sociology Director of Graduate Studies in Sociology (1999-2000) Joint Faculty of East Asian Studies (1991-present) On sabbatical (1997-98) and unpaid (1998-99) leave at HKUST Xi’an Jiaotong University, China (a summer appointment) 2009- Dean and Professor, School of Humanities and Social Science 2009- Founding Director, Institute for Empirical Social Science Research (IESSR) Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Division of Social Science 1997-2006 Associate Professor
    [Show full text]
  • SF 83.4 Bian.Indd
    Occupation, Class, and Social Networks in Urban China* yanjie bian, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology ronald breiger, University of Arizona deborah davis, Yale University joseph galaskiewicz, University of Arizona Abstract China’s class structure is changing dramatically in the wake of post-1978 market- oriented economic reforms. The creation of a mixed “market-socialist” economy has eroded the institutional bases of a cadre-dominated social hierarchy and created conditions for a new pattern of social stratification. Although conditions remain dynamic, results of a 1998 urban survey that measured strength and diversity of social ties among 400 households in four of China’s largest cities documented networks of social exchange among 13 occupation-based classes that identify a class structure distinct from the cadre-dominated social hierarchy of the Mao era. In particular, analysis of visiting during the Lunar New Year celebration suggests an urban society simultaneously divided along two axes: one by economic success in the more privatized economy and one by distinctions in political authority at the workplace. Thus contrary to those who privilege market transactions as the primary engine for creating a new class hierarchy, we conclude that to understand processes of social stratification one needs theories and methods that work simultaneously with multiple dynamics of class differentiation rather than presuming linear hierarchy. * Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Sunbelt International Conference on Social Network Analysis, Cancun, Mexico, February 12–16, 2003; the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta, August 15–19, 2003; and the conference “Current Situations in China,” in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Universities Service Center, Chinese University of Hong Kong, January 5–7, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: a Multilevel Perspective
    ௠ Academy of Management Journal 2004, Vol. 47, No. 6, 795–817. TAKING STOCK OF NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE DANIEL J. BRASS University of Kentucky JOSEPH GALASKIEWICZ University of Arizona HENRICH R. GREVE Norwegian School of Management BI WENPIN TSAI Pennsylvania State University The central argument of network research is that actors are embedded in networks of interconnected social relationships that offer opportunities for and constraints on behavior. We review research on the antecedents and consequences of networks at the interpersonal, interunit, and interorganizational levels of analysis, evaluate recent theoretical and empirical trends, and give directions for future research, highlighting the importance of investigating cross-level network phenomena. A quarter century of social network research in nected relationships that provide opportunities for management journals has resulted in the accumu- and constraints on behavior. This perspective dif- lation of many findings in recent years (see, for fers from traditional perspectives in organizational example, Borgatti and Foster [2003] for a recent studies that examine individual actors in isolation. review). Network studies have appeared regularly The difference is the focus on relations rather than in management journals, contributing to the inves- attributes, on structured patterns of interaction tigation of a wide range of organizational topics rather than isolated individual actors. It is the in- across different levels of analysis (for a discussion tersection of relationships that defines an individ- of the concepts, techniques and measures in net- ual’s centrality in a group, a group’s role in an work analysis, see, for example, Wasserman and organization (White, Boorman, & Breiger, 1976), or Faust [1994]).
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley Wasserman
    CURRICULUM VITAE January 2007 Stanley Wasserman Indiana University 3260 Ramble Road East Department of Statistics Bloomington, Indiana 47408 1022 East Third Street 225 North New Jersey #48 Bloomington, Indiana 47405 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Visible Path Corporation [email protected] 950 Tower Road Suite 1950 [email protected] Foster City, California 94404 http://www.stat.indiana.edu/ PERSONAL DATA Birthdate: 29 August 1951 Birthplace: Louisville, Kentucky Country of Citizenship: U.S.A. Phone Numbers: (812) 855-stat; fax: (812) 856-5713 EDUCATION University of Pennsylvania, 1969-1973 Degrees: Bachelor of Science, in Economics, 1973 (Graduation cum laude, with distinction.) Master of Arts, in Business & Applied Economics, 1973 Harvard University, 1973-1977 Degrees: Master of Arts, in Statistics, 1974 Doctor of Philosophy, in Statistics, 1977 Thesis title: Stochastic Models for Directed Graphs Advisor: Frederick Mosteller CURRENT EMPLOYMENT 2003-present Chief Scientist Visible Path Corporation New York City 2004-present Rudy Professor of Statistics, Sociology, and Psychology Professor of Cognitive Science Department of Statistics Department of Sociology Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Schuessler Institute of Social Research Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana 1 PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT 1974-1975 Research Assistant and System Consultant in Statistics Computer Research Center for Economics and Management Science National Bureau of Economics Research 1976 Instructor Department of Psychology and Social Relations
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology 527 Joseph Galaskiewicz Spring, 2012 Social Science 434 Social Science 415 520-621-7084 Wednesday, 3:30-6:00 PM [email protected]
    Sociology 527 Joseph Galaskiewicz Spring, 2012 Social Science 434 Social Science 415 520-621-7084 Wednesday, 3:30-6:00 PM [email protected] SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS Introduction: The purpose of this course is to give graduate students in the social and behavioral sciences a better understanding of how social network analysis has been used to study a variety of social processes. More specifically, we want to identify the key network concepts that have been used by social and behavioral scientists, describe the ways in which they've been operationalized in empirical research, evaluate their contribution to the understanding of substantive problems in sociology and administrative science in particular, and critique their use. This course cannot cover all the work that has been done in the social and behavioral sciences in the network tradition. The literature is too massive. Nonetheless, the course will be useful for those who wish to learn more about social network analysis and some of its applications. Soc 527 (this course) and Soc 526 (Research Methods in Social Network Analysis) are often offered in alternate years. Students may, if they want, take both courses for credit, in either order. Soc 526 concerns qualitative and quantitative methods for researching social networks. Soc 527 touches upon methods but focuses more on substantive problems in the social and behavioral sciences where networks analysis has made some contribution. Format: For the first twelve weeks the format for the seminar is straightforward. Students are expected to do all the readings beforehand. The instructor will give some background on the topics and some of his own opinions on the readings.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE February 2006
    CURRICULUM VITAE February 2006 DAVID KNOKE Home: 7305 Wooddale Office: Department of Sociology Edina, MN 55435 University of Minnesota (952) 920-5277 Minneapolis, MN 55455 [email protected] (612) 624-4300 Birthdate: March 4, 1947 Martial Status: Married, one adult child ACADEMIC TRAINING: B.A. 1969 University of Michigan: Honors in Psychology, High Honors in Sociology M.A. 1970 University of Chicago: Sociology M.S.W. 1971 University of Michigan: Social Work Administration Ph.D. 1972 University of Michigan: Sociology and Social Work EMPLOYMENT: Instructor, University of Michigan School of Social Work, 1971-1972 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Indiana University, 1972-1975 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Indiana University, 1975-1981 Professor, Department of Sociology, Indiana University, 1981-85 Director, Institute of Social Research, Indiana University, 1982-84 Director, Center for Survey Research, Indiana University, 1982-84 Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, 1985- Chair, 1989-92 Visiting Scholar, University of Chicago, 1979 Gastprofessor, Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden, und Analysen (ZUMA), Mannheim, Germany, 1985 Gastprofessor, Institut für Soziologie, Christian Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, 1989 Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA 1992-93 AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS: National Merit Scholarship, 1965-1969 Executive Editor, The Michigan Daily, 1968-1969 Phi Beta Kappa, 1969 National Science Foundation Fellowship, 1969-1970 NIMH Traineeship,
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2018 University of Chicago 3
    T he U niversity o f C hicago School of Social Service Administration Announcements 2017-201 8 Table of Contents 2 SSA Announcements 3 Officers and Administration 7 The Field and the School 12 Educational Programs 27 Admission Requirements 31 Tuition, Fees, and Financial Aid 34 Resources and Services 39 University Resources and Services 43 Courses of Instruction 68 Faculty Publications 98 Associates 100 Field Agencies 106 SSA Calendar 108 Index 2 SSA Announcements SSA Announcements Please use the left-hand navigation bar to access the individual pages for the SSA Announcements. In keeping with its long-standing traditions and policies, the University of Chicago considers students, employees, applicants for admission or employment, and those seeking access to University programs on the basis of individual merit. The University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national or ethnic origin, age, status as an individual with a disability, protected veteran status, genetic information, or other protected classes under the law (including Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972). For additional information regarding the University of Chicago’s Policy on Harassment, Discrimination, and Sexual Misconduct, please see: http://harassmentpolicy.uchicago.edu/page/policy. The University official responsible for coordinating compliance with this Notice of Nondiscrimination is Bridget Collier, Associate Provost and Director of the Office for Equal Opportunity Programs. Ms. Collier also serves as the University’s Title IX Coordinator, Affirmative Action Officer, and Section 504/ADA Coordinator. You may contact Ms. Collier by emailing [email protected], by calling 773.702.5671, or by writing to Bridget Collier, Office of the Provost, The University of Chicago, 5801 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae YANJIE BIAN (Updated January 2012)
    Curriculum Vitae YANJIE BIAN (Updated January 2012) U.S. CONTACT INFORMATION Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, 267 19th Ave South, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Tel: (612) 624-9554; Fax: (612) 624-7020 Email: [email protected] CHINA CONTACT INFORMATION School of Humanities and Social Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 28 West Xian Ning Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China. Tel: (86-29) 8266-9178/Fax: (86-29) 8266-8281 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION 1990 Ph.D. in sociology, State University of New York at Albany: “Work-Unit Structure and Status Attainment: A Study of Work-Unit Status in Urban China,” Advisor: Professor Nan Lin 1984 M.A. in sociology, Nankai University, China: “Single-Child Family and Its Socioeconomic Implications,” Advisor: Professor Zelin Wu 1982 B.A. in philosophy, Nankai University, China EMPLOYMENT University of Minnesota, Department of Sociology 2006- Professor of Sociology On sabbatical leave (2009-2010, at Xi’an Jiaotong University) 1991-2001 Assistant (1991-97) and Associate (1997-2001) Professor of Sociology Director of Graduate Studies in Sociology (1999-2000) Joint Faculty of East Asian Studies (1991-present) On unpaid leave (1997-99, at HKUST) Xi’an Jiaotong University, China 2009- Dean and Professor, School of Humanities and Social Science Founding Director, Institute for Empirical Social Science Research (IESSR) Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Division of Social Science 1997-2006 Associate Professor (1997-2001), Professor (2001-05), Chair Professor (2005-06) Founding Director,
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate-Nonprofit Linkages in Minneapolis-St. Paul: Findings from a Longitudinal Study 1980-1988
    B9002 I Corporate-Nonprofit Linkages in Minneapolis-St. Paul: Findings from a Longitudinal Study 1980-1988 Principal Investigator: Joseph Galaskiewicz Research Assistants: Sarah Allen Wolfgang Bielefeld Tammie Bougie Naomi J. Kaufman Alisa Potter Kay Schaffer • University of Minnesota September, 1990 Corporate-Nonprofit Linkages in Minneapolis-St. Paul: Findings from a Longitudinal Study - 1980-1988 September, 1990 Principal Investigator: Joseph Galaskiewicz Research Assistants: Sarah Allen Wolfgang Bielefeld Tammie Bougie Naomi J. Kaufman Alisa Potter Kay Schaffer Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (SES 80-08570, SES 83-19364, and SES 88-87258), the Program on Nonprofit Organizations at Yale University, and the University of Minnesota. Special thanks go to the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs who provided funding for the reproduction and distribution of this report. Additional copies of this report are available from: Joseph· Galaskiewicz, Department of Sociology, 909 Social Science Building, 267 19th Avenue South, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455. Executive Summary The report summarizes findings from several studies that have been done over the last ten years on the Third Sector in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metro area. We interviewed representatives of not-for-profit organizations and corporate giving programs, chief executive officers of local business firms, institutional elites, and corporate philanthropic leaders in 1980 and 1981 and again in 1988 and 1989. Our goal is to describe how the sector has changed and how prominent people in this community viewed these changes. The first section of the report examines the nonprofit organization. We surveyed a sample of nonprofits in 1980, 1984, and 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Social Networks
    The Analysis of Social Networks Ronald L. Breiger Department of Sociology University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721-0027 [email protected] This document contains excerpts from a close-to-final draft of a chapter now published as R.L. Breiger. 2004. “The Analysis of Social Networks,” pp. 505-526 in Handbook of Data Analysis, edited by Melissa Hardy and Alan Bryman. London: SAGE Publications, 2004. Ronald Breiger The Analysis of Social Networks Handbook of Data Analysis, edited by Melissa hardy and Alan Bryman. Sage Publications, 2004, pp. 505-526. Outline of chapter (click on a section to read it) From Metaphor to Data Analysis Qualitative or Quantitative? Network Basics Types of Equivalence Statistical Models for Network Structure Culture and Cognition Appendix: Computer Programs, Further Study Acknowledgement Note References The Analysis of Social Networks Ronald L. Breiger Study of social relationships among actors—whether individual human beings or animals of other species, small groups or economic organizations, occupations or social classes, nations or world military alliances—is fundamental to the social sciences. Social network analysis may be defined as the disciplined inquiry into the patterning of relations among social actors, as well as the patterning of relationships among actors at different levels of analysis (such as persons and groups). Following an introduction to data analysis issues in social networks research and to the basic forms of network representation, three broad topics are treated under this chapter’s main headings: types of equivalence, statistical models (emphasizing a new class of logistic regression models for networks), and culture and cognition. Each section emphasizes data- analytic strategies used in exemplary research studies of social networks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Political Economy Model of Organizations
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 387 871 EA 027 059 AUTHOR Johnson, Bob L., Jr. TITLE Resource Dependence Theory: A Political Economy Model of Organizations. PUB DATE Sep 95 NOTE 22p. PUB TYPE Viewpoints (Opinion/Position Papers, Essays, etc.) (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Elementary Secondary Education; Organizational Development; *Organizational Theories; Organizations (Groups); Power Structure; *Resource Allocation; *Resources; Social Exchange Theory IDENTIFIERS *Resource Dependency Theory ABSTRACT Resource-dependence theory is a theory of organization(s) that seeks to explain organizational and interorganizational behavior in terms of those critical resources that an organization must have in order to survive and function. The theory focuses on the following: resources; the flow or exchange of resources between organizations; those dependencies and power differentials created as a result of unequal resource exchange; the constraining effects such dependence has on organizational action; and the effcrts by organizational leaders to manage dependence. With its emphasis on resource exchange, resource dependence representsa political-economy model of organizational and interorganizational behavior. Two strategies used by organizations--buffering and bridging--are discussed. Resource-dependence theory providesa useful framework for thinking about power differences across organizations and for describing the choice of adaptive strategies as a political activity. The theory's major limitation is its assumption that organizational behavior and structures are shaped primarily by materialistic forces; it fails to regard the role of cultural, ideological, and institutional forces. The theory should thei-efore be regarded as a partial, middle-range theory of organization. One figure is included. (Contains 20 references.) (LM1) ***************************i******************************************* Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]