Species Status Assessment Report for the Huachuca Springsnail

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Species Status Assessment Report for the Huachuca Springsnail Huachuca Springsnail SSA Report June 2016 Species Status Assessment Report for the Huachuca Springsnail Version 1.0 June 2016 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Phoenix, AZ 1 Huachuca Springsnail SSA Report June 2016 Species Status Assessment Report for the Huachuca springsnail. June 23, 2016 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 2, Albuquerque, NM This document has been prepared for the purposes of peer and partner review. It is not intended to solicit comments from the public at large. This document was prepared by Nichole Engelmann with assistance from Mike Martinez, Susan Oetker, and Stacey Stanford. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. Species status assessment report for the Huachuca springsnail. Albuquerque, NM, 73 pp.. Species Status Assessment Report For 2 Huachuca Springsnail SSA Report June 2016 Huachuca springsnail (Pyrgulopsis thompsoni) Prepared by the Arizona Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment reports the results of the comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for the Huachuca springsnail (Pyrgulopsis thompsoni) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and, therefore, extinction risk. The Huachuca springsnail is a small aquatic snail endemic to Santa Cruz and Cochise Counties in southeastern Arizona and adjacent portions of northern Sonora, Mexico, with an estimated 29 historical spring ecosystem sites (23 on Federal land, four on private land, two in Mexico) of which 23 are confirmed as occupied sites. To evaluate the biological status of the Huachuca springsnail both currently and into the future, we assessed a range of conditions to allow us to consider the species’ resiliency, redundancy, and representation (together, the 3Rs). The Huachuca springsnail needs multiple resilient populations widely distributed across its range to maintain its persistence into the future and to avoid extinction. A number of factors influence whether Huachuca springsnail populations will grow to maximize habitat occupancy, which increases the resiliency of a population to stochastic events. These factors include (1) sufficient spring flow (water quantity), (2) sufficient water quality, which we define as being free of pollutants and within the natural parameters for springsnails (dissolved oxygen, temperature etc.), (3) free-flowing spring ecosystems, which we define as a spring or seep that is not impounded or obstructed in a way to reduce water quality or water turn-over, (4) sufficient substrate (pebble, gravel, cobble, and woody debris) and aquatic vegetation (aquatic macrophytes, algae, and periphyton) quantity within the springs, and (5) the absence or minimal presence of invasive species like crayfish and mudsnail. If a sufficient number of spring ecosystems provide reliable flow, coupled with appropriate water quality, substrates, suitable water quality, and lack of invasive species that would predate on or compete with the springsnail, then we anticipate springsnails will survive and potentially thrive in abundance. As we consider the future viability of the species, a larger number of populations with high resiliency distributed across the known range of the species would provide higher overall species viability. Populations of Huachuca springsnail have been documented from sites in Cochise and Santa Cruz counties of Arizona, and Sonora Mexico. Extant populations of Huachuca springsnail are estimated to currently occur in at least 23 sites, verified through survey efforts done from 2004 to present. Historically there were an estimated 29 sites; specimens were not collected or tested genetically at all of these sites at the time springsnails were found in them to know if the species truly occurred at all 29 locations. Therefore there is still some uncertainty in the total number of historical populations. Maintaining the extant populations of Huachuca springsnail provides redundancy, and the species is currently represented across most of the historical range with three known haplotypes (1, 2, and 9) at eleven sites, and an unknown haplotype at three sites 3 Huachuca Springsnail SSA Report June 2016 (Table ES-1). A haplotype is a combination of closely linked DNA sequences on one chromosome that are often inherited together, and are used to map genetic structure in a population. We assessed the Huachuca springsnail’s levels of resiliency, redundancy, and representation currently and into the future under three scenarios (Table ES-2), and we then ranked the conditions of each population (Table ES-3, Table ES-4). Rankings are based on qualitative assessments which we then assigned numerical rankings (Table 3.2 and 3.3). Assessments of the relative conditions of spring ecosystems are based on the knowledge and expertise of biologists from the Service, Arizona Game and Fish Department, and other technical experts and resource professionals. Table ES-5 is a combination of the previous tables in describing how each scenario could relate to the resiliency, redundancy and representation of the species. Table ES-1. A study in 2015 sampled 14 sites and determined the haplotypes for 11 of these. These 11 sites denote the most current information available for the representation of genetic diversity of the species. The remaining nine sites that are considered extant have not been sampled. Category Number of Sites Site ID Haplotype 1 & 2 3 BC01, MC01, SC02 RC01, GC01, Haplotype 9 6 GC02, HC02, CS01, SC01, Haplotype 1, 2, 9 2 Scotia02, Scotia03 Unknown 3 GC03, GC04, GC05 Haplotype Total 14 The two most significant stressors to the Huachuca springsnail are the loss of spring discharge, and modification of the spring ecosystems that individuals and populations need to complete their entire life history. The primary causes of historical habitat loss within the range of the Huachuca springsnail are related to anthropogenic modification of spring ecosystems, and/or changes in water quality. Any action that removes suitable habitat can contribute to the potential decline or extirpation of local populations. The primary source of potential future habitat loss is through severe wildfire and grazing. Nonnative snails (competitors) or crayfish (predators) could also invade the springs and affect Huachuca springsnail populations, although it is difficult to reliably predict if, or when, this may occur. The viability of the Huachuca springsnail depends on maintaining multiple resilient populations over time. There is uncertainty regarding if, or when, springs occupied by Huachuca springsnails may experience a reduction or elimination of spring flow, and/or be modified by other factors in the future. This uncertainty is due to not knowing which springs are reliant on groundwater, and which are reliant on snow melt and precipitation runoff, and the uncertainty on when climate change will impact water availability for both sources. Modification uncertainty arises from modifications coming from stochastic events that cannot be predicted, or potential 4 Huachuca Springsnail SSA Report June 2016 management actions that are currently not planned. There have also been stochastic events that have either reduced the abundance of springsnails from previously abundant sites and seemingly reintroduced springsnails to sites which had previously lacked presence results. Given the uncertainty of when either the removal or reintroduction could occur given the stochastic nature of either, we have assessed what the Huachuca springsnail may have in terms of resiliency, redundancy, and representation under three future plausible scenarios using a scenario matrix (Table ES-2). We determined that scenarios 1B, 2B, and 3B are the most likely to occur. Table ES-2. The scenario matrix using the two most significant factors affecting the Huachuca springsnails viability into the future. See Appendix A for further information about the scenarios. Factors Factor Scenario Scenario Spring Discharge Free Flowing/Modification No measurable change in flow rate; ≥80% of ≤10% springs modified in 1 A occupied springs way to minimize habitat stable flow Measurable change in >10%, ≤20% of occupied flow rate; flow still or historical springs 2 present at moderate B modified that reduce level in ≥80% of habitat occupied springs All or most occupied >20% of occupied or springs ≥80% have 3 C historical sites modified to extreme reduction, reduce habitat and low level of flow • 1B: No measurable change in spring flow; springs that are occupied or could be occupied by the Huachuca springsnail experience limited modification. • 2B: A measurable change in spring flow but still enough flow to remove most fine substrates in majority of springs; springs that are occupied or could be occupied by the Huachuca springsnail experience limited modification. • 3B: Springs experience extreme reduction in flow; and springs that are occupied or could be occupied by the Huachuca springsnail experience limited modification, but with limited flow these modifications are magnified in effect. We used the available information to forecast the likely future condition of the Huachuca springsnail. Our goal was to describe the viability of the species in a manner that addresses the needs of the species in terms of resiliency, redundancy, and representation. We considered a range of potential scenarios that forecast important influences on the status of the species, and our results
Recommended publications
  • Vol. 80 Monday, No. 55 March 23, 2015 Pages 15147–15502
    Vol. 80 Monday, No. 55 March 23, 2015 Pages 15147–15502 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 19:07 Mar 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\23MRWS.LOC 23MRWS asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER II Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Email [email protected] Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Phone 202–741–6000 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Biological Assessment for the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program in New Mexico
    2020 Biological Assessment For the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program in New Mexico 01/24/2020 Prepared by USDA, APHIS, PPQ 270 South 17th Street Las Cruces, NM 88005 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (BA) FOR STATE CONSULTATION AND CONFERENCE FOR 2020 GH/MC PROGRAMS IN NEW MEXICO 2020 Biological Assessment for the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program, New Mexico 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), in conjunction with other Federal agencies, State departments of agriculture, land management groups, and private individuals, is planning to conduct grasshopper control programs in New Mexico in 2020. This document is intended as state-wide consultation and conference with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) regarding the APHIS Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program. Beginning in 1987, APHIS has consulted with the FWS on a national level for the Rangeland Grasshopper Cooperative Management Program. Biological Opinions (BO) were issued annually by FWS from 1987 through 1995 for the national program. A letter dated October 3, 1995 from FWS to APHIS concurred with buffers and other measures agreed to by APHIS for New Mexico and superseded all previous consultations. Since then, funding constraints and other considerations have drastically reduced grasshopper/Mormon cricket suppression activities. APHIS is requesting initiation of informal consultation for the implementation of the 2020 Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program on rangeland in New Mexico. Our determinations of effect for listed species, proposed candidate species, critical habitat, and proposed critical habitat are based on the October 3, 1995 FWS letter, the analysis provided in the 2019 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for APHIS suppression activities in 17 western states, and local discussions with FWS.
    [Show full text]
  • THREATENED and ENDANGERED SPECIES of NEW MEXICO 2008 Biennial Review and Recommendations
    THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF NEW MEXICO 2008 BIENNIAL REVIEW DRAFT First Public Comment Period March 11, 2008 New Mexico Department of Game and Fish Conservation Services Division DRAFT 2008 Biennial Review of T & E Species of NM, 3/11/08 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF NEW MEXICO 2008 Biennial Review and Recommendations Authority: Wildlife Conservation Act (17-2-37 through 17-2-46 NMSA 1978) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A total of 118 species and subspecies are on the 2008 list of threatened and endangered New Mexico wildlife. The list includes 2 crustaceans, 25 mollusks, 23 fishes, 6 amphibians, 15 reptiles, 32 birds and 15 mammals (Tables 1, 2). An additional 7 species of mammals has been listed as restricted to facilitate control of traffic in federally protected species. A species is endangered if it is in jeopardy of extinction or extirpation from the state; a species is threatened if it is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range in New Mexico. Species or subspecies of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, mollusks, and crustaceans native to New Mexico may be listed as threatened or endangered under the Wildlife Conservation Act (WCA). During the Biennial Review, species may be upgraded from threatened to endangered, or downgraded from endangered to threatened, based upon data, views, and information regarding the biological and ecological status of the species. Investigations for new listings or removals from the list (delistings) can be undertaken at any time, but require additional procedures from those for the Biennial Review. The 2006 Biennial Review contained a recommendation for maintaining the status for 119 species and subspecies listed as threatened, endangered, or restricted under the WCA, and uplisting four species (Arizona grasshopper sparrow, Pecos bluntnose shiner, spikedace, and meadow jumping mouse ) from threatened to endangered and downlisting two species (shortneck snaggletooth and piping plover) from endangered to threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of a Widely Distributed Western North American Springsnail
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 330: 27–52Systematics (2013) of a widely distributed western North American springsnail... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.330.5852 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematics of a widely distributed western North American springsnail, Pyrgulopsis micrococcus (Caenogastropoda, Hydrobiidae), with descriptions of three new congeners Robert Hershler1,†, Hsiu-Ping Liu2,‡, Corbin Bradford2,§ 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013- 7012, USA 2 Department of Biology, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, CO 80217, USA † http://www.zoobank.org/8448C2D3-FC14-4590-A07C-0C2BA402C1B0 ‡ http://www.zoobank.org/ADD77566-363F-448F-8F52-552A173E90E7 § http://www.zoobank.org/2037981F-B729-452A-B321-C925300199E0 Corresponding author: Robert Hershler ([email protected]) Academic editor: Eike Neubert | Received 24 June 2013 | Accepted 26 August 2013 | Published 10 September 2013 http://www.zoobank.org/64BCF75A-87C9-4302-B4B4-CEC439450805 Citation: Hershler R, Liu H-P, Bradford C (2013) Systematics of a widely distributed western North American springsnail, Pyrgulopsis micrococcus (Caenogastropoda, Hydrobiidae), with descriptions of three new congeners. ZooKeys 330: 27–52. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.330.5852 Abstract We describe three new species of springsnails (genus Pyrgulopsis) from the Amargosa River basin, California and Nevada (P. licina sp. n., P. perforata sp. n., P. sanchezi sp. n.), each of which was previously considered to be part of P. micrococcus. We also restrict P. micrococcus to its type locality area (Oasis Valley) and rede- fine a regional congener, P. turbatrix, to include populations from the central Death Valley region and San Bernardino Mountains that had been previously identified as P.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 134/Thursday, July 12, 2012/Rules
    41088 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations * * * * * Executive Summary and suggestions to improve the final [FR Doc. 2012–17020 Filed 7–11–12; 8:45 am] listing and critical habitat rule. Why we need to publish a rule. Under BILLING CODE 6560–50–P We sought public comment on the the Endangered Species Act, a species designation. During the first comment may warrant protection through listing period, we received five comment if it is endangered or threatened DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR letters directly addressing the proposed throughout all or a significant portion of listing and critical habitat designation. Fish and Wildlife Service its range. The Chupadera springsnail During the second comment period, we (Pyrgulopsis chupaderae) qualifies for received two comment letters 50 CFR Part 17 listing as endangered based on threats to addressing the proposed listing and its habitat and its very limited range, critical habitat designation. We received [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2011–0042; which makes it more susceptible to no comments during the third comment 4500030113] extinction. period, nor any comments regarding the RIN 1018–AV86 This rule designates the Chupadera draft economic analysis or draft springsnail as endangered with critical environmental assessment. habitat. We are listing the Chupadera Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Background and Plants; Determination of springsnail as endangered. In addition, Endangered Status for the Chupadera we are designating critical habitat for It is our intent to discuss below only Springsnail and Designation of Critical the species in two units on private those topics directly relevant to the Habitat property totaling 0.7 hectares (1.9 acres) listing of the Chupadera springsnail as in Socorro County, New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • American Fisheries Society • JUNE 2013
    VOL 38 NO 6 FisheriesAmerican Fisheries Society • www.fisheries.org JUNE 2013 All Things Aquaculture Habitat Connections Hobnobbing Boondoggles? Freshwater Gastropod Status Assessment Effects of Anthropogenic Chemicals 03632415(2013)38(6) Biology and Management of Inland Striped Bass and Hybrid Striped Bass James S. Bulak, Charles C. Coutant, and James A. Rice, editors The book provides a first-ever, comprehensive overview of the biology and management of striped bass and hybrid striped bass in the inland waters of the United States. The book’s 34 chapters are divided into nine major sections: History, Habitat, Growth and Condition, Population and Harvest Evaluation, Stocking Evaluations, Natural Reproduction, Harvest Regulations, Conflicts, and Economics. A concluding chapter discusses challenges and opportunities currently facing these fisheries. This compendium will serve as a single source reference for those who manage or are interested in inland striped bass or hybrid striped bass fisheries. Fishery managers and students will benefit from this up-to-date overview of priority topics and techniques. Serious anglers will benefit from the extensive information on the biology and behavior of these popular sport fishes. 588 pages, index, hardcover List price: $79.00 AFS Member price: $55.00 Item Number: 540.80C Published May 2013 TO ORDER: Online: fisheries.org/ bookstore American Fisheries Society c/o Books International P.O. Box 605 Herndon, VA 20172 Phone: 703-661-1570 Fax: 703-996-1010 Fisheries VOL 38 NO 6 JUNE 2013 Contents COLUMNS President’s Hook 245 Scientific Meetings are Essential If our society considers student participation in our major meetings as a high priority, why are federal and state agen- cies inhibiting attendance by their fisheries professionals at these very same meetings, deeming them non-essential? A colony of the federally threatened Tulotoma attached to the John Boreman—AFS President underside of a small boulder from lower Choccolocco Creek, 262 Talladega County, Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing As Endangered Or
    Vol. 76 Wednesday, No. 207 October 26, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:54 Oct 25, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM 26OCP2 jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 66370 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR period October 1, 2010, through Species-specific information and September 30, 2011. materials we receive will be available Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status for public inspection by appointment, information that may be available for during normal business hours, at the 50 CFR Part 17 the 244 candidate species identified in appropriate Regional Office listed below this CNOR. [Docket No. FWS–R9–ES–2011–0061; MO– under Request for Information in 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General any of the species in this Candidate information we receive will be available Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Notice of Review at any time. at the Office of Communications and and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Conservation, Arlington, VA That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// (see address under FOR FURTHER Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov and http:// INFORMATION CONTACT). Notice of Findings on Resubmitted www.fws.gov/endangered/what-e-do/ Candidate Notice of Review Petitions; Annual Description of cnor.html.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for the DESIGNATION of CRITICAL HABITAT for the CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for the DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT for the CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG Prepared by Mangi Environmental Group For the Department of Interior U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT FOR THE CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG March 2012 Lead Agency: Department of the Interior—United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) Cooperating Agencies: Arizona Game and Fish Department Contact Person: Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor United States Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021 602-242-2513 (fax) Summary The purpose of this environmental assessment (EA) is to identify and disclose the environmental consequences resulting from the Proposed Action of designating critical habitat for the Chiricahua leopard frog (Lithobates chiricahuensis), listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended. The need for the Proposed Action is to comply with the ESA and with a May 6, 2009 order from the Arizona District Court to designate critical habitat if the Secretary determined such a designation was prudent. The physical and biological features of critical habitat in stream and riverine lotic (actively moving water) systems are contained within the riverine and riparian ecosystems formed by the wetted channel and adjacent floodplains within 328 lateral ft (100 lateral m) on either side of bankfull stage. The use of bankfull stage and 328 ft (100 m) on either side recognizes the naturally dynamic nature of riverine systems, recognizes that floodplains are an integral part of the stream ecosystem, and contains the features essential to the conservation of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrgulopsis Chupaderae
    46218 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules Information on Service for Individuals panel at the top of the screen, under the (c) Disease or predation; With Disabilities Document Type heading, check the box (d) The inadequacy of existing For information on facilities or next to Proposed Rules to locate this regulatory mechanisms; or services for individuals with disabilities document. You may submit a comment (e) Other natural or manmade factors or to request special assistance at the by clicking on ‘‘Submit a Comment.’’ affecting its continued existence and (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail public meetings, contact Mr. Rogers threats to the species or its habitat. or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Henderson at the telephone number or (3) Information about any ongoing Processing, Attn: FWS–R2–ES–2011– e-mail address indicated under the FOR conservation measures for, or threats to, 0042; Division of Policy and Directives FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of the Chupadera springsnail and its Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife this notice. habitat. We are particularly interested in Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS receiving any information related to the Dated: July 27, 2011. 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203. potential effects of climate change on J.G. Lantz, We will post all information received the Chupadera springsnail or its habitat. Director of Commercial Regulations and on http://www.regulations.gov. This The following information regarding Standards. generally means that we will post any the potential economic and other [FR Doc. 2011–19459 Filed 8–1–11; 8:45 am] personal information you provide us impacts of the proposed critical habitat BILLING CODE 9110–04–P (see the Information Requested section designation is requested solely so that below for more details).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 70 April 12, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Endangered Status for the Three Forks Springsnail and San Bernardino Springsnail, and Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:12 Apr 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\12APP2.SGM 12APP2 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS2 20464 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Public Comments Solicited section information from the public, other below for more information). concerned governmental and tribal Fish and Wildlife Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: agencies, the scientific community, Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, industry, or any other interested party 50 CFR Part 17 Arizona Ecological Services Field concerning this proposed rule. We [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2009–0083; Office, 2321 West Royal Palm Road, particularly seek comments concerning: 92210–1117–0000–B4] Suite 103, Phoenix, Arizona, 85021; (1) Biological, commercial trade, or telephone 602–242–0210; facsimile other relevant data concerning any RIN 1018–AV84 602–242–2513. If you use a threats (or lack thereof) to these species and regulations that may be addressing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife telecommunications device for the deaf those threats. and Plants; Proposed Endangered (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. (2) Additional information concerning Status for the Three Forks Springsnail the range, distribution, and population SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This and San Bernardino Springsnail, and size of these species, including the document consists of: (1) A proposed Proposed Designation of Critical locations of any additional populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Statewide Public Involvement Plan for Formerly Used Defense Sites in New Mexico
    DRAFT STATEWIDE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN FOR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES IN NEW MEXICO Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District Contract No. W9128F-04-D-0005 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Privileged and Confidential Attorney/Client Work Product—Privileged March 2006 DRAFT STATEWIDE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN FOR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES IN NEW MEXICO Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Albuquerque District 4101 Jefferson Plaza Northeast Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109 Prepared by HydroGeoLogic, Inc. 1155 Herndon Parkway, Suite 900 Herndon, Virginia 20170 March 2006 The findings, opinions, and conclusions contained in this report are solely those of HydroGeoLogic, Inc. These findings, opinions, and conclusions do not necessarily reflect the position of the United States of America, or any of its departments or agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 1.1 Background .......................................................1 1.2 Goals of Community Relations and Public Outreach Programs ..................2 1.3 FUDS and Risk Communication ........................................4 2.0 NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY PROFILE ...................................11 2.1 State History .....................................................11 2.1.1 Native American Pueblos ......................................11 2.1.2 Spanish Colonization .........................................11 2.1.3 Mexican Province ...........................................12 2.1.4 American Territory
    [Show full text]