DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Thursday, December 6, 2007 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:51 Dec 05, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\06DEP2.SGM 06DEP2 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2 69034 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR candidate species and in management best available scientific and commercial for conserving them. We also request information. As defined in section 3 of Fish and Wildlife Service information on additional species that the Act, an endangered species is any we should consider including as species which is in danger of extinction 50 CFR Part 17 candidates as we prepare future updates throughout all or a significant portion of of this notice. its range, and a threatened species is Endangered and Threatened Wildlife This document also includes our any species which is likely to become and Plants; Review of Native Species findings on resubmitted petitions and an endangered species within the That Are Candidates for Listing as describes our progress in revising the foreseeable future throughout all or a Endangered or Threatened; Annual Lists of Endangered and Threatened significant portion of its range. Through Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Wildlife and Plants during the period the Federal rulemaking process, we add Petitions; Annual Description of September 26, 2006, through September species that meet these definitions to Progress on Listing Actions 30, 2007. the List of Endangered and Threatened AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, DATES: We will accept comments on the Wildlife at 50 CFR 17.11 or the List of Interior. most recent Candidate Notice of Review Endangered and Threatened Plants at 50 CFR 17.12. As part of this program, we ACTION: Notice of review. at any time. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments maintain a list of species that we regard SUMMARY: In this Candidate Notice of regarding a particular species to the as candidates for listing. A candidate Review (CNOR), we, the U.S. Fish and Regional Director of the Region species is one for which we have on file Wildlife Service (Service), present an identified in SUPPLEMENTARY sufficient information on biological updated list of plant and animal species INFORMATION as having the lead vulnerability and threats to support a native to the United States that we responsibility for that species. You may proposal to list as endangered or regard as candidates for or have mail or fax comments of a more general threatened, but for which preparation proposed for addition to the Lists of nature to the Chief, Division of and publication of a proposal is Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Conservation and Classification, U.S. precluded by higher-priority listing and Plants under the Endangered Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 N. actions. Species Act of 1973, as amended. Fairfax Drive, Room 420, Arlington, VA We maintain this list of candidates for Identification of candidate species can 22203 (facsimile 703/358–2171). a variety of reasons: to notify the public assist environmental planning efforts by Written comments and materials we that these species are facing threats to providing advance notice of potential receive in response to this notice will be their survival; to provide advance listings, allowing landowners and available for public inspection by knowledge of potential listings that resource managers to alleviate threats appointment at the Division of could affect decisions of environmental and thereby possibly remove the need to Conservation and Classification (for planners and developers; to provide list species as endangered or threatened. comments of a general nature only) or information that may stimulate and Even if we subsequently list a candidate at the appropriate Regional Office listed guide conservation efforts that will species, the early notice provided here in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. remove or reduce threats to these could result in more options for species Species assessment forms with species and possibly make listing management and recovery by prompting information and references on a unnecessary; to solicit input from candidate conservation measures to particular candidate species’ range, interested parties to help us identify alleviate threats to the species. status, habitat needs, and listing priority those candidate species that may not The CNOR summarizes the status and assignment are available for review at require protection under the Act or threats that we evaluated in order to the appropriate Regional Office listed additional species that may require the determine that species qualify as below in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION or Act’s protections; and to solicit candidates and to assign a listing at the Division of Conservation and necessary information for setting priority number (LPN) to each species, Classification, Arlington, Virginia (see priorities for preparing listing proposals. or to remove species from candidate address above), or on our Internet Web We strongly encourage collaborative status. Additional material that we site (http://endangered.fws.gov/ conservation efforts for candidate relied on is available in the Species candidates/index.html). species and offer technical and financial assistance to facilitate such efforts. For Assessment and Listing Priority FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The additional information regarding such Assignment Forms (species assessment Endangered Species Coordinator(s) in assistance, please contact the forms, previously called candidate the appropriate Regional Office(s) or appropriate Regional Office listed in forms) for each candidate species. Chris Nolin, Chief, Division of Overall, this CNOR recognizes 5 new Conservation and Classification SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION or visit our candidates, changes the LPN for 29 (telephone 703–358–2171; facsimile Internet Web site, http:// candidates, and removes 4 species from 703–358–1735). Persons who use a endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ candidate status. Combined with other telecommunications device for the deaf index.html. decisions for individual species that (TDD) may call the Federal Information Previous Notices of Review were published separately from this Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. CNOR, the new number of species that We have been publishing candidate are candidates for listing is 280. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: notices of review (CNOR) since 1975. We request additional status Candidate Notice of Review The most recent CNOR (prior to this information that may be available for CNOR) was published on September 12, the 280 candidate species identified in Background 2006 (71 FR 53755). CNORs published this CNOR. We will consider this The Endangered Species Act of 1973, since 1994 are available on our Internet information in preparing listing as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) Web site, http://www.fws.gov/ documents and future revisions to the (Act), requires that we identify species endangered/candidates/index.html. For notice of review, as it will help us in of wildlife and plants that are copies of CNORs published prior to monitoring changes in the status of endangered or threatened, based on the 1994, please contact the Division of VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:51 Dec 05, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP2.SGM 06DEP2 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules 69035 Conservation and Classification (see distinct population segments of and published in the Federal Register, ADDRESSES section above). vertebrate species, and species for while work on others is still under way. On September 21, 1983, we published which listing is appropriate in a See the discussions of Preclusion and guidance for assigning an LPN for each significant portion of their range. Expeditious Progress, below, for candidate species (48 FR 43098). Using The result of the ranking system is details.) this guidance, we assign each candidate that we assign each candidate a listing Based on our review of the best an LPN of 1 to 12, depending on the priority number of 1 to 12. For example, available scientific and commercial magnitude of threats, imminence of if the threat(s) is of high magnitude, information, with this CNOR we threats, and taxonomic status; the lower with immediacy classified as imminent, identify 5 new candidate species (see the LPN, the higher the listing priority the listable entity is assigned an LPN of New Candidates, below), change the (that is, a species with an LPN of 1 1, 2, or 3 based on its taxonomic status LPN for 28 candidates (see Listing would have the highest listing priority). (e.g., if the species is the only member Priority Changes in Candidates, below) Such a priority ranking guidance system of a genus, it would be assigned to the and determine that listing proposals are is required under section 4(h)(3) of the LPN 1 category, a full species to LPN 2, not warranted for 4 species and thus Act (15 U.S.C. 1533(h)(3)). As explained and a subspecies, DPS, or significant remove them from candidate status (see below, in using this system we first portion of the range to LPN 3). In Candidate Removals, below). Combined categorize based on the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Weber River, Utah
    An International Periodical Promoting Conservation and Biodiversity Southwestern United States—Mexico—Central America Una Revista Internacional para Fomentar la Conservación y Biodiversidad El Suroeste de USA—México—Centroamérica STATUS AND STRUCTURE OF TWO POPULATIONS OF THE BLUEHEAD SUCKER (CATOSTOMUS DISCOBOLUS) IN THE WEBER RIVER, UTAH P. A ARON WEBBER,PAUL D. THOMPSON,* AND PHAEDRA BUDY Colorado River Fishery Project, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 1380 South 2350 West, Vernal, UT 84078 (PAW) Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, 515 East 5300 South, Ogden, UT 84405 (PDT) United States Geological Survey, Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 8432 (PB) * Correspondent: [email protected] THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 57(3): 267–276 SEPTEMBER 2012 STATUS AND STRUCTURE OF TWO POPULATIONS OF THE BLUEHEAD SUCKER (CATOSTOMUS DISCOBOLUS) IN THE WEBER RIVER, UTAH P. A ARON WEBBER,PAUL D. THOMPSON,* AND PHAEDRA BUDY Colorado River Fishery Project, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 1380 South 2350 West, Vernal, UT 84078 (PAW) Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, 515 East 5300 South, Ogden, UT 84405 (PDT) United States Geological Survey, Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 8432 (PB) * Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT—We compared two populations of the bluehead sucker (Catostomus discobolus) during 2007–2009 in the Weber River, Davis, Summit, and Weber counties, Utah. We estimated 225 and 546 individuals in these populations. Based on recaptured, PIT-tagged fish, annual survival of adults (202–575 mm total length) was high (77%); however, our top model indicated mortality increased with size (i.e., senescence).
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtail Chub (Gila Robusta Robusta): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta robusta): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project May 3, 2005 David E. Rees, Jonathan A. Ptacek, and William J. Miller Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. 1113 Stoney Hill Drive, Suite A Fort Collins, Colorado 80525-1275 Peer Review Administered by American Fisheries Society Rees, D.E., J.A. Ptacek, and W.J. Miller. (2005, May 3). Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta robusta): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/roundtailchub.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank those people who promoted, assisted, and supported this species assessment for the Region 2 USDA Forest Service. Ryan Carr and Kellie Richardson conducted preliminary literature reviews and were valuable in the determination of important or usable literature. Laura Hillger provided assistance with report preparation and dissemination. Numerous individuals from Region 2 national forests were willing to discuss the status and management of this species. Thanks go to Greg Eaglin (Medicine Bow National Forest), Dave Gerhardt (San Juan National Forest), Kathy Foster (Routt National Forest), Clay Spease and Chris James (Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forest), Christine Hirsch (White River National Forest), as well as Gary Patton and Joy Bartlett from the Regional Office. Dan Brauh, Lory Martin, Tom Nesler, Kevin Rogers, and Allen Zincush, all of the Colorado Division of Wildlife, provided information on species distribution, management, and current regulations. AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES David E. Rees studied fishery biology, aquatic ecology, and ecotoxicology at Colorado State University where he received his B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Experimental Crosses in Hawaiian Bidens (Asteraceae)1
    Additional Experimental Crosses in Hawaiian Bidens (Asteraceae) 1 GEORGE W. GILLETT2 FOR THE PAST 35 YEARS the phenomenon of coast and 2.5 miles (4.0 km) east of Black Sand natural hybridization has been linked with Beach. Associated plants include Metrosideros, Hawaiian Bidens, mostly through the energetic Scaevola taccada, and Polypodium. Elev. 12 m. and discerning fieldwork of Otto Degener. Sev- Bidens menziesii var. filiformis (Gray) Sherif. eral natural hybrids were reported by Sherif Gillett 1756. Hawaii. Erect shrub 2-4 m high (1937), based on the collections of Degener growing on the south slopes of Mauna Kea in and others. The list of putative natural hybrids dry land shrub vegetation including Dodonaea,' was extended to 16 by Gillett and Lim (1970). Osteomeles, Dubautia, and mixed grasses. Elev. The latter paper reported some 23 different ex- 1,800 m. perimental F1 hybrids, indicating weak to non- Bidens mauiensis var. cuneatoides (Gray) existent genetic barriers between species and Sherff. Gillett 1873. West Maui. Decumbent giving a general confirmation to the field and herb growing on the sand hills near Waihee, herbarium studies of hybridization. The purpose with Lipochaeta, Scaevola coriacea, Nama, Fim­ of this paper is to record additional experi- bristylis, and associated dune vegetation. About mental hybrids in Hawaiian Bidens, some of 500 m from the sea, elev. 20 m. these involving two species (B. fulvescens and Bidens mauiensis var. mauiensis (Gray) B. skottsbergii) which gave poor indications of Sherff. Gillett 1872. East Maui. Decumbent interspecific hybridizations in the earlier cross- herb growing on the south slope of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2017
    Ellipsaria Vol. 19 - No. 4 December 2017 Newsletter of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Volume 19 – Number 4 December 2017 Cover Story . 1 Society News . 4 Announcements . 7 Regional Meetings . 8 March 12 – 15, 2018 Upcoming Radisson Hotel and Conference Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin Meetings . 9 How do you know if your mussels are healthy? Do your sickly snails have flukes or some other problem? Contributed Why did the mussels die in your local stream? The 2018 FMCS Workshop will focus on freshwater mollusk Articles . 10 health assessment, characterization of disease risk, and strategies for responding to mollusk die-off events. FMCS Officers . 19 It will present a basic understanding of aquatic disease organisms, health assessment and disease diagnostic tools, and pathways of disease transmission. Nearly 20 Committee Chairs individuals will be presenting talks and/or facilitating small group sessions during this Workshop. This and Co-chairs . 20 Workshop team includes freshwater malacologists and experts in animal health and disease from: the School Parting Shot . 21 of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota; School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin; School 1 Ellipsaria Vol. 19 - No. 4 December 2017 of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University; the US Geological Survey Wildlife Disease Center; and the US Fish and Wildlife Service Fish Health Center. The opening session of this three-day Workshop will include a review of freshwater mollusk declines, the current state of knowledge on freshwater mollusk health and disease, and a crash course in disease organisms. The afternoon session that day will include small panel presentations on health assessment tools, mollusk die-offs and kills, and risk characterization of disease organisms to freshwater mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • Astelia Waialealae
    Plants Pa‘iniu Astelia waialealae SPECIES STATUS: Federally Listed as Candidate Medeiros, © Smithsonian 2005 Genetic Safety Net Species IUCN Red List Ranking – Critically Endangered (CR D) Hawai‘i Natural Heritage Ranking‐ Critically Imperiled (G1) Endemism – Kaua‘i SPECIES INFORMATION: Astelia waialealae is a terrestrial rhizomatous perennial herb in the astelia family (Asteliaceae). Plants are short, from a bulbous caudex. Leaves silvery, 12‐20 cm long, and wooly pubescent. Scapes 10‐20 cm long. Racemes 3‐7 cm long. Tepals dark purple and densely pubescent. DISTRIBUTION: Astelia waialealae is endemic to the montane bogs on the central plateau of the island of Kaua‘i. Found only within the Alaka‘i Swamp, Sincock Bog, and Wai‘ale‘ale Summit areas. ABUNDANCE: Three subpopulations are known; with a total population of probably less than ten mature individuals in the Alaka‘i Swamp. The populations have shown a drastic decline over the past ten years. LOCATION AND CONDITION OF KEY HABITAT: Montane bogs located within wet forests in the cloud zone on the central plateau of the island of Kaua‘i. All three of the current occurrences are in Alaka‘i Swamp Wilderness Preserve. THREATS: In the past, most of the bogs have been heavily damaged by feral pigs; Competition with alien plants for light, space, and water; Fire; Small number of remaining individuals. CONSERVATION ACTIONS: The goals of conservation actions are not only to protect current populations, but also to establish further populations to reduce the risk of extinction. In addition to common statewide and island conservation actions, specific actions include: All remaining individuals are within small fenced, weeded, and monitored areas; Augment wild populations and establish new populations in safe harbors; Establish secure ex‐situ stocks with complete representation of remaining individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests
    A GUIDE TO Priority Plant and Animal Species IN OREGON FORESTS A publication of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute Sponsors of the first animal and plant guidebooks included the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Oregon State University and the Oregon State Implementation Committee, Sustainable Forestry Initiative. This update was made possible with help from the Northwest Habitat Institute, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University and Oregon State University. Acknowledgments: The Oregon Forest Resources Institute is grateful to the following contributors: Thomas O’Neil, Kathleen O’Neil, Malcolm Anderson and Jamie McFadden, Northwest Habitat Institute; the Integrated Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS), supported in part by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Bonneville Power Administration under project #2003-072-00 and ESRI Conservation Program grants; Sue Vrilakas, Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources; and Dana Sanchez, Oregon State University, Mark Gourley, Starker Forests and Mike Rochelle, Weyerhaeuser Company. Edited by: Fran Cafferata Coe, Cafferata Consulting, LLC. Designed by: Sarah Craig, Word Jones © Copyright 2012 A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests Oregonians care about forest-dwelling wildlife and plants. This revised and updated publication is designed to assist forest landowners, land managers, students and educators in understanding how forests provide habitat for different wildlife and plant species. Keeping forestland in forestry is a great way to mitigate habitat loss resulting from development, mining and other non-forest uses. Through the use of specific forestry techniques, landowners can maintain, enhance and even create habitat for birds, mammals and amphibians while still managing lands for timber production.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Top
    America’s Top 40: A Call to Action for the Nation’s Most Imperiled Species A Report from WildEarth Guardians By Nicole Rosmarino, PhD April 2009 MISSION STATEMENT WildEarth Guardians protects and restores the wildlife, wild places and wild rivers of the American West. Inquiries about this report and WildEarth Guardians’ work can be made directly to: Nicole Rosmarino, PhD WildEarth Guardians 1536 Wynkoop St., Suite 301 Denver, CO 80202 303-573-4898 [email protected] Photos: Front cover (left column, top to bottom): crimson Hawaiian damselfly (Hawaii Biological Survey/Bishop Museum); Lanai tree snail (William Mull 1976, provided by University of Hawaii, Hawaii Biodiversity & Mapping Project); Cyanea calycina (J.K. Obata, provided by University of Hawaii); (middle column, top to bottom): Texas golden glade cress (Center for Plant Conservation/Mercer Arboretum and Botanic Gardens); Cyanea kuhihewa (Smithsonian Institute, Department of Botany, David H. Lorence); large-flowered Balsamo (Maya LeGrande, provided by University of Hawaii); Phyllostegia floribunda (C.H. Lamoureux, provided by University of Hawaii); (right column, top to bottom): chucky madtom (Conservation Fisheries, Inc.); jack bean (M. LeGrande, provided by University of Hawaii); Akikiki or Kauai creeper (National Biological Information Infrastructure/Pacific Basin Information Node); Nesiotes Megalagrion damselfly (Hawaii Biological Survey/Bishop Museum); Akoko (M. LeGrande, provided by University of Hawaii); Back cover, Papala (Jay Tutchton). ©WildEarth Guardians. All rights reserved. America’s Top 40 Executive Summary The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) keeps a list of species called its “Top 40,” which are the most imperiled candidates for Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 194
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 194 / Thursday, October 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 69425 the Interior’s manual at 512 DM 2, we References Cited Regulation Promulgation readily acknowledge our responsibility Accordingly, we amend part 17, to communicate meaningfully with A complete list of references cited in this rulemaking is available on the subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the recognized Federal Tribes on a Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: government-to-government basis. In Internet at http://www.regulations.gov accordance with Secretarial Order 3206 and upon request from the Panama City PART 17—ENDANGERED AND of June 5, 1997 (American Indian Tribal Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS Rights, Federal-Tribal Trust FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). ■ 1. The authority citation for part 17 Responsibilities, and the Endangered Authors Species Act), we readily acknowledge continues to read as follows: our responsibilities to work directly The primary authors of this final rule Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531– with tribes in developing programs for are the staff members of the Panama 1544; 4201–4245; unless otherwise noted. healthy ecosystems, to acknowledge that City Ecological Services Field Office. ■ 2. Amend § 17.11(h) by adding an tribal lands are not subject to the same List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 entry for ‘‘Moccasinshell, Suwannee’’ to controls as Federal public lands, to the List of Endangered and Threatened remain sensitive to Indian culture, and Endangered and threatened species, Wildlife in alphabetical order under to make information available to tribes. Exports, Imports, Reporting and CLAMS to read as set forth below: The Suwannee moccasinshell is not recordkeeping requirements, § 17.11 Endangered and threatened known to occur within any tribal lands Transportation.
    [Show full text]