DOCSLIB.ORG

Forb Species Establishment Increases with Decreased Grass Seeding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forb Species Establishment Increases with Decreased Grass Seeding RESEARCH ARTICLE Forb Species Establishment Increases with Decreased Grass Seeding Density and with Increased Forb Seeding Density in a Northeast Kansas, U.S.A., Experimental Prairie Restoration Timothy L. Dickson1,2,3 and William H. Busby4 Abstract dominant grasses. The results also suggest that seed avail- Most prairie restorations fail to produce the diversity of ability limits the establishment of some forbs. Forb diver- species found in unplowed remnants. This lack of restored sity can therefore be increased by decreasing grass diversity is hypothesized to be partly due to the inhibition seeding density, by increasing forb seeding density, or of forb species by high seeding densities of dominant both. However, forb seeds are generally expensive, and grasses and partly due to the low seeding densities of forbs increasing forb seeding density across the entire area of used in many restorations. We tested this hypothesis by a restoration may be prohibitively expensive. We there- sowing various densities of forb and warm-season grass fore recommend a low seeding density of dominant seeds into a restoration begun on bare soil. This is the first grasses, and we recommend spatially separating forbs replicated restoration experiment we are aware of that from dominant grasses by adding most forb seeds to areas varies grass seeding densities to examine the effects on with little to no dominant grasses and by adding the rest forbs. Four years after seeding, we found that higher den- of the forb seeds to areas with a low density of dominant sities of grass seeds decreased forb cover, biomass, and grasses. richness, and higher densities of forb seeds increased forb richness. These results suggest that dominant grasses Key words: conservative forb species richness, Conserva- compete strongly with native forb species and that many tion Reserve Program, grassland, optimal seed mix, weedy forb species thrive when they are spatially separated from species. Introduction sity of forbs (Seabloom et al. 2003; Sheley & Half 2006) or Prairie restorations generally fail to produce the diversity to the inhibitory effects of seeding high densities of domi- of plant species found in prairie remnants (Weber 1999; nant grasses (Weber 1999; Kindscher & Fraser 2000). Polley et al. 2005; but see Pfeiffer 1999; Whitney 1999). ‘‘Conservative’’ species are also generally absent from Restorations in other parts of the world also generally restorations. Conservative species are rarely found outside fail to produce plant diversity similar to remnant levels undisturbed remnant plant communities and can be (Lockwood & Pimm 1999; Walker et al. 2004). This lack thought of as late successional (Swink & Wilhelm 1994). of restored diversity is largely due to a lack of establish- These species are hypothesized to be inhibited by high ment from forbs (broadleaf herbs). Forbs are the most densities of dominant grasses and other aggressive species diverse group of plant species in the tallgrass/mixed-grass (Packard 1997). prairie. They comprise at least 60% of the plant species in Although it is recognized that high densities of domi- remnant areas of Konza Prairie in northeastern Kansas nant grasses may hinder the establishment of forbs (Collins et al. 1998) and the proportion increases to the (Kindscher & Fraser 2000) and conservative species east of Konza. Comparatively low forb establishment in (Weber 1999), there are several reasons many prairie restorations may be due to low seeding richness and den- restorationists continue to seed dominant grasses at high densities. Restorationists have been influenced by the agricultural practice of planting high densities of domin- 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, U.S.A. ant grasses as a way to reduce soil erosion (Boyd 1942; 2 Present address: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Jelinski & Kulakow 1996). Planting high densities of dom- Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, U.S.A. 3 Address correspondence to T. L. Dickson, email [email protected] inant grasses is championed in restoration by the ‘‘prairie 4 Kansas Biological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, matrix’’ concept (Betz 1986; Betz et al. 1999) and other U.S.A. planting strategies (Wilson 1970; Schramm 1992) as Ó 2007 Society for Ecological Restoration International a method to control weedy species and improve soil char- doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00427.x acteristics. A high density of grass seed also costs very SEPTEMBER 2009 Restoration Ecology Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 597–605 597 little because grass seed is generally much less expensive Program (CRP; Jelinski & Kulakow 1996) and seeded to than forb seed. native species in 2001, several days before the experimen- Few explicit tests of the effects of dominant prairie tal area received any seeds. Management during the study grasses on forb species have been completed, but period consisted of mowing the entire field (including the Kindscher and Fraser (2000) report that areas sown with- experiment) to approximately 17.8 cm height in July 2001 out grass seeds contain 84.6% forb cover (both sown and and June 2002 and conducting a controlled burn in March nonsown species) and higher species richness than areas 2003. Soil at the site was Sibleyville Loam with 3–7° slopes sown with grass seeds (18.2% forb cover). Also, plant spe- (Dickey et al. 1977). The soil was derived from sandstone cies diversity appears to stay the same or slightly decline and loamy shale and has experienced some erosion. The over time in sites initially sown with high densities of grass climate of the region was humid continental, with mean and dominant prairie species (Sluis 1999). In other studies, annual temperature of 12.7°C and mean annual precipita- forbs do not establish well when seeded into intact stands tion of 952 mm. Seasonal temperatures can be extreme, of grass (Williams et al. 2007), even though transplants have with minimum temperatures in winter as low as 229°C moderate establishment success (Warkins & Howell 1983; and maximum temperatures in summer as high as 43°C. Brown & Bugg 2001). Previous studies do not examine The seasonal distribution of precipitation was unimodal, whether low densities of grass allow greater forb establish- peaking in June (Kettle & Whittemore 1991). According ment than high densities of grass. Also, in the study most to the U.S. drought monitor, there were no drought condi- similar to the experiment presented here (Kindscher & tions during the growing seasons of 2001 and 2004, but Fraser 2000), the no grass treatment is not truly replicated there were abnormally dry to severe drought conditions because it is on a strip of land that accidentally does not from July to October 2002 and abnormally dry to extreme receive grass seeds. drought conditions from July to October 2003 (NDMC, Low seeding densities of forb seeds may also decrease USDA, and NOAA 2008). forb abundance and richness (Seabloom et al. 2003; Sheley & Half 2006). Many of the most difficult forb spe- cies to establish from seed also have very expensive seed. Field Methods As a result, these species are often seeded at low density or All seeds in the experiment were sown at densities relative not at all. Increasing the seeding density of these forb spe- to the densities of purchased seeds in the surrounding cies may therefore increase their abundance and richness. CRP planting (ambient density). Grass seeds (0.53 ambi- Although we focus on forb species establishment, we ent density; 23 ambient density) and forb seeds (23 ambi- also examine whether seeding density affects weed abun- ent density; 83 ambient density) were sown on bare soil dance (Betz 1986; Schramm 1992) and whether seeding in a factorial design. We also added one treatment with no density affects bare ground. Competition from certain grass and 83 ambient forb seed density. We hereafter weeds can dramatically reduce prairie establishment refer to 0.53 grass density and 23 forb density as low den- (Blumenthal et al. 2003), and increased bare ground can sity, and we refer to 23 grass density and 83 forb density increase soil erosion (Ellison 1950) and the spread of as high density. Low density of grass seed was 0.08 g/m2 of weeds (Bergelson et al. 1993) while also aiding the estab- Tripsacum dactyloides and 0.42 g/m2 of all other grasses lishment of some seeded species (Gross 1984). combined (Table 1; 1 g/m2 ¼ 8.92 pounds per acre). Low We manipulate both grass and forb seeding density, but density of forb seed was 0.18 g/m2 of Dalea purpurea and not seeding richness, in our experiment. The objective for 0.42 g/m2 of all other forbs combined. The low and high the study is to find the level of grass and forb seeding densities bracket Diboll’s (1997) recommended seeding density that will maximize forb abundance and richness. rates for tall-prairie plantings. Low densities were approx- Our hypothesis is that higher grass seeding density will imately half the recommended weight of grasses and of decrease forb establishment, and higher forb seeding den- forbs, whereas high densities were approximately twice sity will increase forb establishment only at low grass sow- the recommended weight. The number of seeds added at ing density (forb 3 grass sowing density interaction). We low density was lower for grasses than for forbs, with ap- also examine whether abundant forb species are decreas- proximately 1 T. dactyloides seed/m2 and 150 seeds/m2 of ing the percentage cover of other forb species. all other grasses combined, and 96 D. purpurea seeds/m2 and 184 seeds/m2 of all other forbs combined. The number of seeds was estimated from the seed weights listed in Methods the 2007 Prairie Moon Nursery catalog (Winona, MN, U.S.A.).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Forb Information Sheet
    United States Department of Agriculture Native Forb Information Sheet Missouri Information Sheet IS-MO-643Native Forb Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Missouri Conservation Practice 643 December 2017 Native forbs, or broadleaf plants, are a natural part of the Missouri landscape. They welcomed European settlers to the state, painting the prairie and savanna landscapes with vibrant colors that changed throughout the season while supporting an incredible diversity of native wildlife. More than 800 plant species, most of them forbs, have been identified on Missouri’s prairies. Missourians are demonstrating a rekindled interest in native forbs for their beauty, hardiness, and wildlife benefits. Native forbs are well adapted to Missouri’s climatic extremes, which range from potentially brutal cold in January to the often stifling heat of July. Once established, native forbs require few inputs and little maintenance. Native forbs feature a variety of shapes, sizes, color, and value to wildlife. The towering compass plant, the vibrant butterfly milkweed, the rather plain but very valuable roundhead lespedeza, and the unique rattlesnake master all add important diversity to any planting. Choosing which ones to plant can be difficult; contact your local conservation agency representative, or one of the vendors of native forb seed for assistance. You can find a list at www.plant-materials.nrcs.usda.gov/mopmc, www.grownative.org, or www.monativeseed.org. Seed vendors can be excellent sources of information, and they are often as eager as you are for your planting to be successful. Refer to Table 1 in this document for general information about native forbs that are most often available commercially.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants at the UHCC
    Flora Checklist Texas Institute for Coastal Prairie Research and Education University of Houston Donald Verser created this list by combining lists from studies by Grace and Siemann with the UHCC herbarium list Herbarium Collections Family Scientific Name Synonym Common Name Native Growth Accesion Dates Locality Comments Status Habit Numbers Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis fringeleaf wild petunia N forb 269 10/9/1973 Acanthaceae Ruellia nudiflora violet wild petunia N forb Agavaceae Manfreda virginica false aloe N forb Agavaceae Polianthes sp. polianthes ? forb 130 8/3/1971 2004 roadside Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron radicans eastern poison ivy N woody/vine Apiaceae Centella erecta Centella asiatica erect centella N forb 36 4/11/2000 Area 2 Apiaceae Daucus carota Queen Anne's lace I forb 139-142 1971 / 72 No collections by Dr. Brown. Perhaps Apiaceae Eryngium leavenworthii Leavenworth's eryngo N forb 144 7/20/1971 wooded area in pipeline ROW E. hookeri instead? Apiaceae Eryngium yuccifolium button eryngo N forb 77,143,145 71, 72, 2000 Apiaceae Polytaenia texana Polytaenia nuttallii Texas prairie parsley N forb 32 6/6/2002 Apocynaceae Amsonia illustris Ozark bluestar N Forb 76 3/24/2000 Area 4 Apocynaceae Amsonia tabernaemontana eastern bluestar N Forb Aquifoliaceae Ilex vomitoria yaupon N woody Asclepiadaceae Asclepias lanceolata fewflower milkweed N Forb Not on Dr. Brown's list. Would be great record. Asclepiadaceae Asclepias longifolia longleaf milkweed N Forb 84 6/7/2000 Area 6 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias verticillata whorled milkweed N Forb 35 6/7/2002 Area 7 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias viridis green antelopehorn N Forb 63, 92 1974 & 2000 Asteraceae Acmella oppositifolia var.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Management of Medusahead (Taeniatherum Caput- Medusae Ssp
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 52 Number 3 Article 6 12-18-1992 Ecology and management of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput- medusae ssp. asperum Melderis) James A. Young Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Reno, Nevada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Young, James A. (1992) "Ecology and management of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae ssp. asperum Melderis)," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 52 : No. 3 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol52/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 52(3), pr. 245-252 ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF MEDUSAHEAD (TAENIATHERUM CAPUT-MEDUSAE SSP. ASPERUM [SIMK.] MELDERlS) ABsn\Acr.-Medusahead is nnother in the extensive list of annual herbaceous S],X-"Cies to invade thl:: tempemte desert rangelands of the Great Basin. Mednsahead is not preferred by large herhin)res and apparently is not preferred by gmnivores. Herbage ofthis anlllial gl'ass enhances ignition and sprei.ld ofwildFIres. Mcdwmhcad is highly competitive with the se<..--dlings of IlJltive spedcs and is prohably the greate..<>t threat to the biodiver.<iity uf the natural vegdation that has yet been accidentally introduced into the Great 8nsin. Despite the obvious hiological disruptions that are os.rociated with medusahead invasion, the species offers a wealtll of opportunities for stlldents to examine the mechanism by which thiS species is so sllccessful.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between Elevated Atmospheric CO2 and Defoliation on North American Rangeland Plant Species at Low and High N Availability
    Grass and Forage Science The Journal of the British Grassland Society The Official Journal of the European Grassland Federation Interactions between elevated atmospheric CO2 and defoliation on North American rangeland plant species at low and high N availability D. R. LeCain*, J. A. Morgan*, G. L. Hutchinson*, J. D. Reeder* and F. A. Dijkstra† *U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Rangeland Resources Research Unit, Crops Research Laboratory, Fort Collins, CO, USA, and †Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, The University of Sydney, Level 4, Biomedical Building, 1 Central Avenue, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia Abstract Keywords: semi-arid rangeland, CO2, defoliation, nitro- 15 Although common disturbances of grazing lands like gen, C3 grass, C4 grass, forb, root, biomass, N recov- plant defoliation are expected to affect their sensitivity ery, forage quality. to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration, almost no research has been conducted to evaluate how important such effects might be on the direct responses of Introduction rangelands to CO2. This growth chamber experiment About 40% of terrestrial ecosystems are classified as subjected intact plant–soil cylinders from a Wyoming, rangelands (Suttie et al., 2005). Rangeland ecosystems USA, prairie to a 3-way factorial of CO2 (370 vs. are not characteristically productive lands, but they )1 720 lLL ), defoliation (non-clipped vs. clipped) and support most of the world’s managed livestock in )2 soil nitrogen (control vs. 10 g m added N) under addition to large herds of native ungulates (Campbell simulated natural climatic conditions. Above- and et al., 1997). The productivity of rangelands may be below-ground biomass and N dynamics of the func- slowly increasing owing to the fertilization effects of tional groups C3 grasses, C4 grasses and forbs were rising levels of atmospheric CO2 (Polley, 1997; Morgan investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Frequent Mowing on Survival and Persistence of Forbs Seeded Into a Species-Poor Grassland Dave W
    Effects of Frequent Mowing on Survival and Persistence of Forbs Seeded into a Species-Poor Grassland Dave W. Williams,1 Laura L. Jackson,2,3 and Daryl D. Smith1 Abstract controls. Forbs in mowed plots had significantly greater Many early attempts at tallgrass prairie reconstruction root and shoot mass than those in control plots in the failed to achieve the high species diversity of remnant first and second growing seasons but were not signifi- cantly more abundant. By the fourth growing season, prairies, and instead consist primarily of C4 grasses. We hypothesized that frequent mowing of established prai- however, forbs were twice as abundant in the mowed rie grasses could create sufficient gaps in the above- treatments. No lasting negative impacts of frequent ground and belowground environment to allow for the mowing on the grass population were observed. Mowing establishment of native forbs from seed. We studied forb a second year influenced species composition but did not seedling establishment in a 25-year-old prairie planting change total seedling establishment. Experimental evi- in northern Iowa that was dominated by native warm- dence is consistent with the idea that mowing reduced season grasses. In winter 1999, 23 species of native forbs competition for light from large established grasses, al- were broadcast into the recently burned sod at a rate lowing forb seedlings the opportunity to reach sufficient of 350 viable seeds/m2. Treatment plots were mowed size to establish, survive, and flower in the second and weekly for either one or two growing seasons, and con- subsequent years. trol plots were unmowed.
    [Show full text]
  • South Eastern Australia Temperate Woodlands
    Conservation Management Zones of Australia South Eastern Australia Temperate Woodlands Prepared by the Department of the Environment Acknowledgements This project and its associated products are the result of collaboration between the Department of the Environment’s Biodiversity Conservation Division and the Environmental Resources Information Network (ERIN). Invaluable input, advice and support were provided by staff and leading researchers from across the Department of Environment (DotE), Department of Agriculture (DoA), the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the academic community. We would particularly like to thank staff within the Wildlife, Heritage and Marine Division, Parks Australia and the Environment Assessment and Compliance Division of DotE; Nyree Stenekes and Robert Kancans (DoA), Sue McIntyre (CSIRO), Richard Hobbs (University of Western Australia), Michael Hutchinson (ANU); David Lindenmayer and Emma Burns (ANU); and Gilly Llewellyn, Martin Taylor and other staff from the World Wildlife Fund for their generosity and advice. Special thanks to CSIRO researchers Kristen Williams and Simon Ferrier whose modelling of biodiversity patterns underpinned identification of the Conservation Management Zones of Australia. Image Credits Front Cover: Yanga or Murrumbidgee Valley National Park – Paul Childs/OEH Page 4: River Red Gums (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) – Allan Fox Page 10: Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia) – Trent Browning Page 16: Gunbower Creek – Arthur Mostead Page 19: Eastern Grey
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Root Systems of Forbs of Grassland and a Consideration of Their Significance J
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 7-1958 Classification of Root Systems of orbsF of Grassland and a Consideration of Their Significance J. E. Weaver University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Weaver, J. E., "Classification of Root Systems of orbsF of Grassland and a Consideration of Their Significance" (1958). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 483. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/483 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Copyright 1958 Ecological Society of America VOL. 39 JULY, 1958 No. 3 CLASSIFICATION OF ROOT SYSTEMS OF FORBS OF GRASSLAND AND A CONSIDERATION OF THEIR SIGNIFICANCE J. E. WEAVER Department of Botany, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Plants other than grasses constitute an impor- turity. Hence, they may absorb partly below the tant part of the native grasslands of North Amer- root zone of grasses and thus lessen root compe- ica. M\4ostof these are forbs, a few are shrubs tition. Perhaps 90 percent of the abundant forbs, and half-shrubs. Probably 85 to 90 percent of like most prairie grasses, are not only perennial the forbs are perennial and most are as deeply but have a life span extending over a long period rooted and many far more deeply rooted than the of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Native Forbs of the Northern Great Basin Important for Greater Sage-Grouse Tara Luna • Mark R
    United States Department of Agriculture Common Native Forbs of the Northern Great Basin Important for Greater Sage-Grouse Tara Luna • Mark R. Mousseaux • R. Kasten Dumroese Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report November Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-387 2018 Luna, T.; Mousseaux, M.R.; Dumroese, R.K. 2018. Common native forbs of the northern Great Basin important for Greater Sage-grouse. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-387. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; Portland, OR: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon–Washington Region. 76p. Abstract: is eld guide is a tool for the identication of 119 common forbs found in the sagebrush rangelands and grasslands of the northern Great Basin. ese forbs are important because they are either browsed directly by Greater Sage-grouse or support invertebrates that are also consumed by the birds. Species are arranged alphabetically by genus and species within families. Each species has a botanical description and one or more color photographs to assist the user. Most descriptions mention the importance of the plant and how it is used by Greater Sage-grouse. A glossary and indices with common and scientic names are provided to facilitate use of the guide. is guide is not intended to be either an inclusive list of species found in the northern Great Basin or a list of species used by Greater Sage-grouse; some other important genera are presented in an appendix. Keywords: diet, forbs, Great Basin, Greater Sage-grouse, identication guide Cover photos: Upper le: Balsamorhiza sagittata, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Williams, D., and D.D. Smith, 2007. the Effects of Seeding Rate of Prairie
    The Effects Varying Seeding Rates of Prairie Grasses and Forbs on Native Plant Establishment in a Prairie Reconstruction Final Report Prepared by: Dave W. Williams Daryl D. Smith Tallgrass Prairie Center University of Northern Iowa DOT Project Title: Revegetation Research for U.S. 20 R-O-W in E. Black Hawk County Grant Period 2004-2006 Final Report Date: March 01, 2007 Award: $50,867.00* * This grant award funded two additional research projects 1 Executive Summary The Iowa DOT is seeking ways to improve practices associated with revegetation projects to increase establishment of native grasses and forbs. Iowa DOT has developed various seed mixes for re-vegetation projects (Iowa DOT 2005). Each seed mix has the potential to result in a different plant community. Results from this research project will provide information on the seeding rates for species needed for optimal establishment of grasses and wildflowers in future Iowa DOT prairie plantings as well as determine if current seeding practices are adequate. This information can be used to revise or develop seeding rate recommendations for re- vegetation projects. In 2004, experimental plots were established in the right-of-way along Interstate 20 in Black Hawk County, Iowa. The experiment replicated a typical Iowa DOT re-vegetation prairie planting. All Iowa DOT specifications for a re-vegetation planting (site preparation, seeding, and mowing) were followed in the experiment. Prairie plant establishment, biomass, and richness and weed biomass and richness were compared in plots seeded with the same species but at different seeding rates: 1:1 (A seed mix with an equal amount of grass and forb seed), 1:5 (A forb rich seed mix with five times more forb seed than grass seed), 5:1(A grass rich seed mix with five times more grass seed than forb seed).
    [Show full text]
  • Native Grass and Forb Establishment
    Native Grass and Forb Establishment PURPOSE: Native grasses, forbs (flowering broadleaf plants) and legumes (nitrogen fixing plants) are established for wildlife primarily to provide food and structural cover that most non-native plants, such as smooth brome and tall fescue, do not (Figure 1). Most native grasses grow in clumps, which creates an open structure at the ground level allowing small or young wildlife to move around easily while staying hidden from predators (Figure 2). The clumps of native grasses also creates ideal nesting habitat for ground nesting birds. Forbs and legumes attract beneficial insects that serve as the primary food source for most Kansas upland birds from April to Figure 1. A diverse stand of native grasses and forbs provides cover and food for wildlife. October (Figure 2). Forbs and legumes also provide forage for deer and other wildlife. Seeds from forbs and legumes are eaten by wildlife throughout the fall and winter months when high energy carbohydrates are needed. Unlike non-native grasses, most native plants remain standing throughout the winter months, creating better protection from snow and harsh winter winds (Figure 2). Stands of native grasses and forbs offer numerous benefits besides wildlife habitat. Native grasses and forbs are a good alternative for sites not suitable for traditional row crop agriculture, such as areas susceptible to continuous erosion, field corners, areas with poor drainage, and rocky or poor soils. When planted along waterways or creeks and streams, stands of native grasses and forbs can help enhance water quality by filtering excessive nutrients and toxins out of the water that would otherwise runoff the field and directly into the water supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Native Forb Seed Supplies for the Great Basin
    Increasing Native Forb Seed Supplies for the Great Basin Nancy L. Shaw Scott M. Lambert Ann M. DeBolt Mike Pellant Nancy L. Shaw is Research Botanist, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Boise, ID 83702; telephone: 208.373.4360; e-mail: [email protected]. Scott M. Lambert is Regional Seed Coordinator, USDI Bureau of Land Management, Boise, ID 83709; e-mail: Scott_Lambert@ blm.gov. Ann M. DeBolt is Botanist, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Boise, ID 83702; e-mail: [email protected]. Mike Pellant is Great Basin Restoration Initiative Coordinator, USDI Bureau of Land Management, Boise, ID 83709; e-mail: [email protected] In: Dumroese, R. K.; Riley, L. E.; Landis, T. D., tech. coords. 2005. National proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—2004; 2004 July 12–15; Charleston, NC; and 2004 July 26–29; Medford, OR. Proc. RMRS-P-35. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Abstract: Over the last 150 years, excessive grazing, annual weed invasions, increased wildfire frequency, and other human disturbances have negatively impacted native plant communities of the Great Basin. Native plant materials and appropriate planting strategies are needed to re- create diverse communities in areas requiring active restoration. Although native forbs are critical components of most plant communities, available seed supplies remain low. A cooperative research project being conducted by the USDI Bureau of Land Management Great Basin Restoration Initiative, the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, and collabo- rators includes efforts to develop 20 native forbs as revegetation species.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing Gloria in the Lemhi Mountains, Idaho, for Long-Term Monitoring of Alpine Vegetation
    ESTABLISHING GLORIA IN THE LEMHI MOUNTAINS, IDAHO, FOR LONG-TERM MONITORING OF ALPINE VEGETATION By Michael Mancuso, Mancuso Botanical Services, Boise, ID and Rose Lehman, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, Idaho Falls, ID 2019 Report prepared for the Caribou-Targhee National Forest, Idaho Falls, ID and Salmon-Challis National Forest, Salmon, ID ABSTRACT The alpine zone represents an ecosystem at a climate extreme; one that is very temperature dependent and predicted to be a sensitive indicator to climatic changes. GLORIA (Global Observation Research Initiative in Alpine Environments) is a program to establish and maintain a worldwide, long-term monitoring network for comparative study of climate change impacts on mountain vegetation and its biodiversity. The GLORIA monitoring program aims to document vegetation changes over time in alpine environments using plots established on a set of summits that represent a low to high alpine elevational gradient within a target region. In 2018, we established the first GLORIA target region in Idaho, in the Lemhi Mountains. Plot establishment and baseline sampling was completed on three summits – Bruce Canyon Peak, Spring Mountain, and Sheep Mountain, all located south of the historic mining town of Gilmore. GLORIA summits ranged from 3066 m (10050 ft) for Bruce Canyon Peak, to 3312 m (10865 ft) elevation at Sheep Mountain, a gradient extending from a short distance upslope of the treeline ecotone to the regional upper alpine. Sampling recorded a total of 82 vascular plant species at the 3 GLORIA summits, including 1 tree, 2 shrub, 13 graminoid, and 66 forb species. Spring Mountain had the most floristic diversity with 66 species, followed by Bruce Canyon Peak with 44 species, and Sheep Mountain with 35 species.
    [Show full text]