DOCSLIB.ORG

Radical Criminology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Radical Criminology [ features ] A RADICAL GROUNDING FOR SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY: A POLITICAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION OF THE CAUSES OF POVERTY, INEQUALITY AND CRIME IN URBAN AREAS MICHAEL LYNCH & LYNDSAY N. BOGGESS his article !a"in s s$ cific &'s r(ati&#s T a'&)t crim $r&*)c * '+ s&cial dis&rga- #izatio# th &r+ /SDT0 r lat * t& th r latio#- ship ' t1 # )r'a# $&( rt+, i# 2)alit+ a#* crim , 3r&" th $ rs$ ctiv &3 radical crimi- #&logical. As 1 #&t ' lo1, th * ( lo$" #t &3 radical crimi#&logical !$la#atio#s &3 crim #t r * a stat &3 *&r"a#c+ '+ th 5667s at th sa" tim that incr as * att #- tio# 1as ' in, $aid t& !$a#din, critical al- t r#ati( s t& th kinds &3 class-'as * a#* $&- litical c&#&"ic a$$r&ach s $r 3 rr * '+ ra*- ical crimin&logists i# &th r *isciplin s4 Sinc 5667, that t #* #c+ t& sh+ a1a+ 3r&" class a#* $&litical c&#&"ic a#al+sis has als& $r&- 11 12| RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN 1929-7904) *)c * a lac8 &3 critical in( stigatio# &3 &rth&- *&! th &ries &3 crim a#* th a(&ida#c &3 class-'as * critiq) s &3 th&s th &ries4 9hile this &'s r(atio# a$$lies t& all c&#t "$&rar+ &rth&*&! th &ries / 4,4, th r has ' # limit * &r #& radical critiq) &3 lif -c&)rs th &r+ :3&r a# !c $tio# s L+#ch 566;<, s lf-c&#tr&l th &r+, * ( lo$" #tal th &ries, , # ral th &- ries :3&r a# !c $ti&# s , L+#ch a#* Gr&( s, 566=<0, it is als& a$$lica'le t& th c&#tin) * * ( lo$" #t &3 a critiq) &3 s&cial dis&rga#i- zatio# th &ries &3 crim (L+#ch a#* Gr&( s 56>;? L+#ch a#d Michalo1ski @77;04 I# lin 1ith th a'&( &'s r(atio#s, th ar- ,)" #t ' lo1 !a"in s h&1 radical crimi#&- logical th &r+ ca# ' )s * t& critiq) a#* !- t #* th ass)"$tio#s &3 SDT in 1a+s that ar c&#sist #t 1ith a $&litical c&#&"ic a#al+sis &3 th r latio#ship ' t1 # crim , $&( rt+ a#* in 2)alit+4 O3 $artic)lar c&#c r# i# this a#al+sis is a# !$lorati&# &3 th ass&ciati&# ' t1 # $&( rt+, i# 2)alit+ a#* crim $&sit * '+ s&cial dis&rga#izatio# th &r+, 1hich "arks a )s 3)l startin, $&int 3&r a "&r radical a#al+sis &3 th s ass&ciatio#s4 Fr&" a radical $ rs$ cti( , SDT lacks a# a#al+sis &3 th &rigins a#* th *istrib)ti&# &3 $&( rt+ a#* i# 2)alit+ in )r'a# ar as4 That "issin, th &r tical * scriptio# ca# ' a*- dr ss * '+ th ass)"$tio#s inh r #t in $&liti- cal c&#&"ic a$$r&ach s )s * t& addr ss th $r&*)ctio# &3 crim 4 LYNCH & BOGGESS | RADICAL SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY |13 T& ' s)r , $&( rt+ a#* in 2)alit+ ar t1& &3 th "&r $ rsist #t c&rr lat s &3 crim in SDT r s arch, a#* th a'ilit+ &3 radical a$- $r&ach s t& !$lain th diff r #tial *istrib)- tio# &3 $&( rt+ a#* i# 2)alit+ in )r'a# la#*- sca$ sBa# iss) that SDT *& s #&t addr ss th &r ticall+, a#* rath r ' gins 1ith th !is- t #c &3 $&( rt+ a#* in 2)alit+B !t #ds &)r a'ilit+ t& c&#c $t)alize a#* )#* rsta#* h&1 ca$italis" $r&*)c s crim thr&)gh th int r- " diar+ a$$ ara#c &3 (isible s&cial a#* c&- #&"ic &)tc&" s s)ch as $&( rt+ a#* in 2)al- it+4 I# sh&rt, th 3&c)s &3 this 1&r8 is !$lain- in, th " r, #c a#* distrib)tio# &3 $&( rt+ a#* i# 2)alit+ in ca$italist s&cieties, th ir tra#s3 r #c t& )r'a# s$ac , a#* th ir c&## ctio# t& crim 4 Th ,&al is t& radicalize s&cial dis&r,a#izatio# th &r+ a#* ca$t)r its "a#+ i#sights in 1a+s that ar c&#sist #t 1ith a radical !$la#atio# &3 crim 4 I# *&ing s&, 1 ar a'le t& ide#tif+ th 1a+s in 1hich radical crimin&lo,+ a#* SDT c&"$le" #t &# a#- &th r4 Th $rimar+ 3&c)s &3 a radical !t #sio# &3 SDT 3&c)s s &# $r&(idin, a $&litical c&- #&"ic !$la#atio# &3 th &rigins &3 $&( rt+ a#* in 2)alit+4 SDT ' gins 1ith a# ass)"$- tio# that in a#+ s&ciet+, $&( rt+ a#* in 2)al- it+ !ists, a#* that th s s&cial 3act&rs ar *is- trib)t * )# 2)all+ 1ithi# )r'a# ar as4 9ith 3 1 !c $ti&#s /Sa"$s&# a#* 9ils&# 566=? Sa"$s&# @75@? 9ils&# 56>C), SDT *& s #&t &A r a# !$la#atio# &3 th , &gra$h+ &3 $&( rt+ a#* i# 2)alit+, a#* h #c ca##&t !- 14| RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN 1929-7904) $lain why crim is distrib)t * th 1a+ that it is !c $t 1ith r 3 r #c t& th ass)" * )#- 2)al distrib)ti&# &3 $&( rt+ a#* in 2)alit+4 Radical !$la#ati&#s ca# * $ # th ar,)- " #ts &3 SDT '+ illustratin, h&1 $&( rt+ a#* in 2)alit+ ar $r&*)c * a#* *istrib)t * 1ithin ca$italist s+st "s &3 $r&*)ctio# a#* 1ithin )r'a# ar as i# 1a+s that ar c&#sist #t 1ith a#* r $r&*)c th str)ct)ral t #* #cies &3 ca$italist s+st "s t& $r&"&t in 2)alit+ a#* $r&*)c $&&r, c&#&"icall+ "arginal $&$)latio#s4 T& !$lor this iss) 3)rth r, 1 ' gi# 1ith &)r 'ac8gr&)#* ass)"$ti&#s a#* $r&(ide a*- ditio#al s)$$&rt 3&r th t+$ &3 ar,)" #t &3- 3 r * h r 4 I# th s ctio#s that 3&llo1, 1 r - (ie1 th , # ral ass)"$ti&#s &3 SDT a#* its %#dings 1ith r s$ ct t& $&( rt+, i# 2)alit+ a#* crim 4 N !t, 1 ' gin &)r disc)ssio# &3 th radicalizati&# &3 SDT4 Finall+, 1 i#clu* a disc)ssio# &3 s&" &3 th limitatio#s &3 &)r ar,)" #t a#* s),, stio#s 3&r additio#al th - &r tical !$&sitio# &3 a radical $ rs$ ctiv &# s&cial dis&r,a#izatio#4 BACKGROUND Th radical traditio# in crimi#&lo,+, '+ 1hich 1 " a# th $r 3 r #c t& "$lo+ $&- litical c&#&"ic a#al+sis a#* str)ct)ral &rie#- tatio#s 3&r th a#al+sis &3 crim , la1 a#* D)s- tic , has ' # lar, l+ *&r"a#t i# th @5st c #- t)r+4 T& ' s)r , critical crimin&lo,+ 1hich inclu* s th &r tical a#al+sis &)tside &3 $&liti- LYNCH & BOGGESS | RADICAL SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY |15 cal c&#&"ic th &r+, has ra$idl+ !$a#* * i# r c #t * ca* s4 Ma#+ &3 th&s !$la#atio#s, h&1 ( r, &( rlo&8 th r le(a#c &3 $&litical c&#&"ic th &r+ 3&r !$lainin, crim , in- cluding, 3&r !a"$le, th * ca* lo#, * clin in crim (L+#ch @75E'), a#* inst a* ha( h lp * $r&"&t a c)lt)ral t)r# in crimin&l- &,+ (Farr ll, Ha+1ar* a#* Y&)#, @77>? F&# s @75E? s "&r , # rall+, Fa" s&# 566>04 EA&rts t& r " *+ th # glect &3 radical crimin&lo,+ a#* its $&litical c&#&"ic "- $hasis ha( ' # )#* rta8 # i# r c #t + ars4 I# additio# t& th c)rr #t D&)r#al, Radical Criminology, a r c #t iss) s &3 th Journal of Crime and Justice /@75E0 calls att #tio# t& $&lit- ical c&#&"ic !$la#atio#s a#* t& " rgin, !$la#ati&#s a#* &rie#tati&#s * sign * t& h lp r in(ig&rat radical crimin&lo,+ (Michalo1ski @75E? Gra" r @75E? L+#ch @75E'? Carls&# t al. @75E? Str t s8+ t al @75E? Barr tt @75E04 As #&t * i# articles i# th Journal of Crime and Justice (L+#ch @753a), th # gl ct as 1 ll as th critiq) &3 th radical crimin&logical a$$r&ach s a#* th $r 3 r #c 3&r class-'as * a#al+sis is ide&logicall+ sit)- at * in &rth&*&! crimin&logical ass)"$tio#s a'&)t th ca)s s &3 crim 4 Orth&*&! critics, 3&r !a"$le, ha( hist&ricall+ r D ct * th i#i- tial ass)"$ti&#s &3 radical !$la#ati&#s, c&"- $arin, th th &r tical ass)"$tio#s &3 radical !$la#ati&#s &3 crim a#* D)stic t& th *&c- trin &3 c&"")#ist stat s4 As a c&#s 2) #c , th&s critiq) s r D ct radical crimin&lo,+ '&th &)t &3 ha#* a#* ide&logicall+, a#* 3ail t& 16| RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN 1929-7904) a$$r ciat th c&#trib)tio#s radical th &r+ ca# "a8 t& !$la#ati&#s &3 crim a#* D)s- tic 4 I# *&in, s&, a 1ide (ariet+ &3 &rth&*&! th &ries r D ct radical !$la#ati&#s &3 crim a#* D)stic 1ith&)t a th&r&)gh-,&in, a#al+sis &3 its ass)"$tio#s &r th r lat * "$irical r - s arch /s L+#ch, Sch1 #din, r a#* Sch1 #din, r @77;, 3&r disc)ssio#04 Crimi- #&logists lar, l+ a(&id radical !$la#ati&#s, a#* ha( 3ra" * th critiq) s &3 that a$- $r&ach ar&)#* a s ries dat d, lar, l+ in(alid criticis"s (L+#ch @75E'04 Th&s criticis"s, 3&r !a"$le, * $ict radical !$la#atio#s as a'- stract, a#ti- "$irical, as )#2)a#tifia'le, a#* 2) sti&#a'le ' ca)s &3 th ir ass)" * $&liti- cal &rie#tatio#s /3&r r (ie1 s L+#ch a#* Michalo1ski @77;04 As #&t d, this t+$ &3 crit- icis" is dat * a#* has #&t 8 $t $ac 1ith th * ( lo$" #t &r a$$licatio# &3 radical crimi- #&lo,+, a#* s$ ciall+ its "$irical a$$lica- tio#s t& th st)*+ &3 crim (L+#ch, Sch1 #din, r a#d Sch1 #din, r @77;04 9hil th&s criticis"s ha( ' c&" irr le- (a#t t& th #at)r &3 "&r c&#t "$&rar+ ( r- sio#s &3 radical crimi#&lo,+, th r ar , t& ' s)r , limitatio#s i# th radical crimin&logical lit rat)r , a#* th&s li"itatio#s ha( 3acili- tat * th # glect &3 radical crimi#&lo,+4 Chi 3 a"&#, th&s li"itatio#s has ' # th 3ailur t& c&#tin) a radical critiq) &3 &rth&*&! th - &ries &3 crim that &#c st&&* c #t r sta, i# radical crimin&lo,+ / 4,4, Ta+lor, 9alt&# a#* Y&)#, 56CE? Cha"'liss 56C=? Gris' r, 56C=? Q)in# + 56>704 D)rin, th h +-da+ &3 radical LYNCH & BOGGESS | RADICAL SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY |17 crimin&lo,+ in th 56C7s a#* 56>7s &# c&)ld locat r 3 r #c s t& radical crimin&logical a$- $r&ach s in a #)"' r &3 &rth&*&! crimin&- logical st)dies4 That is t& sa+, * s$it th cri- tiq) &3 radical crimin&lo,+ that ha* ' # * ( lo$ * '+ &rth&*&! crimin&logists, &rth&- *&! crimin&logists still "a* r 3 r #c t& th im$&rta#t insights &3 radical crimin&lo,+ s- $ ciall+ in r latio# t& $&litical c&#&"ic a#al- +sis a#* disc)ssio#s &3 class 'ias 1ith r s$ ct t& crim , la1 a#* D)stic , a#* th r&le &3 insti- t)tio#alize* $&1 r as a# im$&rta#t iss) t& c&#sider 1h # !$lainin, crim , la1 a#* D)s- tic 4 This critiq) 1as s$ ciall+ r le(a#t t& class 'ias a#* th # glect &3 th crim s &3 th $&1 r3)l (L+#ch a#* Michalo1ski @77;04 R 3- r #c s t& radical crimin&logical lit rat)r , h&1 ( r, ha( lar, l+ disa$$ ar * 3r&" th &rth&*&! crimin&logical lit rat)r , a#* i# $art, that &)tc&" is a c&#s 2) #c &3 th # gl ct &3 th 3)rth r * ( lo$" #t &3 $&liti- cal c&#&"ic a#* class-'as * !$la#ati&#s a#* th * ( lo$" #t &3 ")ltiple alt r#ativ critical crimin&logical a$$r&ach s that # - glect class-'as * a#al+sis a#* critiq) (L+#ch @75E'04 T& 3acilitat 3)rth r * ( lo$" #t &3 radical !$la#ati&#s &3 crim a#* c&#trib)t t& r in- (ig&ratio# &3 that a$$r&ach, i# th $r s #t 1&r8 1 dra1 att #tio# t& $&litical c&#&"+ a#* its int rs ctio# 1ith &# &3 th "aD&r str)ct)ral a$$r&ach s "$lo+ * '+ &rth&*&! crimin&logistsBs&cial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Spectre Is Haunting Law and Society: Revisiting Radical Criminology at UC Berkeley
    72 DAVID STEIN A Spectre Is Haunting Law and Society: Revisiting Radical Criminology at UC Berkeley David Stein* The task has been to study the historical relationship between criminal law and economics, the history of class struggle, and to utilize these interrelationships to analyze the present prison system. – Georg Rusche, Labor Market and Penal Sanction Introduction N FALL 2012 JONATHAN SIMON, PROFESSOR AT UC BERKELEY, AND TONY PLATT, visiting professor at San Jose State University, initiated a remarkable experi- Iment in pedagogy and scholarly collaboration. Building off discussions and disagreements between them, they designed a course that would revisit the politi- cal context and scholarly analysis of the radical wing of UC Berkeley’s School of Criminology in the period prior to its closing in 1976 (Platt 2010; Simon 2010). Titled “From Community Control to Mass Incarceration: Legacies of 1970s Crimi- nology,” the course investigated the growth of mass incarceration from the vantage point of those who studied and criticized the nascent political architecture of such a system while it was developing into a force with stunning depth and magnitude. The course attracted students and auditors from other departments, together with scholars and professors from other institutions and long-time activists, political thinkers, and guest lecturers such as professors Ericka Huggins and Angela Y. Davis. A proxy class also developed amongst New York-based anti-imprisonment activists to read through the syllabus and think about the course themes. In sum, the course material spoke to the urgent issues of our contemporary moment and brought forth a corresponding response from excited participants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Retrospective View of Critical Legal Studies and Radical Criminology Albert P
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 84 Article 3 Issue 3 Fall Fall 1993 Radicalism in Law and Criminology: A Retrospective View of Critical Legal Studies and Radical Criminology Albert P. Cardarelli Stephen C. Hicks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Albert P. Cardarelli, Stephen C. Hicks, Radicalism in Law and Criminology: A Retrospective View of Critical Legal Studies and Radical Criminology, 84 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 502 (Fall 1993) This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 009 1-4169/93/8403-0502 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 84, No. 3 Copyright © 1993 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printedin U.S.A. CRIMINOLOGY RADICALISM IN LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY: A RETROSPECTIVE VIEW OF CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES AND RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY ALBERT P. CARDARELLI* & STEPHEN C. HICKS** I. INTRODUCTION: HISTORY AS A PRELUDE As the end of the century approaches, there is a growing senti- ment that we may be witnessing the end of the "Left" as a major ideological force in American society.' The reasons for the pur- ported demise, especially in American politics, are not always in agreement, even among leftist scholars themselves. 2 One explana- tion posits that the fall from power began with the ascendancy of the "Right" in national politics with the election of Ronald Reagan, and was accelerated by the collapse of communist governments through- * Senior Fellow, John W.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Delinquency 3 Theories of Causation
    03-Martin (juvenile).qxd 1/19/2005 2:48 PM Page 61 Juvenile Delinquency 3 Theories of Causation Many theories have been advanced to explain the cause of juvenile delinquency. Some are quite sophisticated, whereas others are predicated on rather basic “instinctive” conclusions that may or may not have a basis in fact. Many juvenile curfews are based on an instinctive conclusion that youths are likely to be victimized or get into trouble after certain hours. For example, in August 1994 the Town of Vernon, Connecticut, enacted its first juvenile curfew law.1 It forbade persons under 18 to be in any public place or busi- ness. The rationale was that town leaders had noticed groups of juveniles loitering in town, and prior to the law a teenager had been murdered. Surveys also indicated that youths were fearful about gangs, weapons, and victimization. According to leaders, the cur- few was passed for the protection of young people and to reduce the incidence of delinquency. From Sunday through Thursday, the prohibited hours were from 11:00 P.M. until 5:00 A.M., and on Friday and Saturday the prohib- ited hours were from 12:01 A.M. until 5:00 A.M. Unfortunately for the town leaders, the curfew law was held to be unconstitutional because it unfairly restricted the right of free movement, and hence the equal protection rights of juveniles. rom the time of the first civil communities, every society has declared F certain modes of behavior to be unacceptable or criminal in nature. Early customs and laws mandated compliance and punishment for the greater good of the group, city, or nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Criminology: a Sympathetic Criticism from the Viewpoints of Philosophical and Theological Anarchism
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 8-1-1979 Radical Criminology: A Sympathetic Criticism from the Viewpoints of Philosophical and Theological Anarchism J. Anthony Watkins University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Watkins, J. Anthony, "Radical Criminology: A Sympathetic Criticism from the Viewpoints of Philosophical and Theological Anarchism" (1979). Student Work. 2119. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/2119 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY: A SYMPATHETIC CRITICISM FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL ANARCHISM A Thesis Presented to the Department of Criminal Justice and the Faculty of the College of Graduate Studies University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by J. Anthony Watkins August 1979 UMI Number: EP73659 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissortaiion Publishing UMI EP73659 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Lyndsay Nicole Boggess University of South Florida March 2020 Department of Criminology Cell Phone: (727) 430-1223 4202 E. Fowler Ave, SOC 107 Office: (813) 974-9556 Tampa, FL 33620 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Criminology, Law & Society, 2009 University of California, Irvine M.A. Criminal Justice, 2003 The George Washington University B.A. Sociology, Psychology, 2000 Vanderbilt University PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT Associate Professor – Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, Fall 2015 – present Assistant Professor – Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, Fall 2009 – Spring 2015 PUBLICATIONS *Indicates current or former graduate student Peer-reviewed manuscripts Powers, Ráchael A., Richard Moule, Cassandra Dodge*, and Lyndsay N. Boggess. (forthcoming). Structuring the "Invisible War": A social-ecological model of military sexual assaults, American Journal of Preventative Medicine. Boggess, Lyndsay N. and Alyssa W. Chamberlain. (forthcoming). Neighborhood housing investment and domestic assault victimization, Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Krupa, Julie M.*, Lyndsay N. Boggess, Alyssa W. Chamberlain, and Tony Grubesic. (forthcoming). Noxious housing: The influence of single room occupancy (SRO) facilities on neighborhood crime, Crime & Delinquency. doi.org/10.1177/0011128719875701. Boggess, Lyndsay N., Ráchael A. Powers, and Alyssa W. Chamberlain. (2018). Sex, race, and place: Taking an intersectional approach to understanding neighborhood-level violent crime across race and sex. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55:493-537. Powers, Ráchael A., Alyssa W. Chamberlain, and Lyndsay N. Boggess. (2018). The impact of structural disadvantage on the gender-gap and sex-specific rates of nonlethal violent victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 64:201-226. doi: 10.1177/0011128717719049. Chamberlain, Alyssa and Lyndsay N.
    [Show full text]
  • RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY Meal (I.E
    [ insurgencies ] Repression, Resistance, and the Neocolonial Prison Nation K.KERSPLEBEDEB In California, the past several months have witnessed one of the most impressive prison struggles in recent memory. For 21 days in July and 17 in September/October of 2011, thousands of prisoners participated in a hungerstrike against torture. De­ spite not winning all of their demands, the prisoners won politi­ cally, transforming the terrain on which they, and we, must or­ ganize our next move. Prisoners in isolation at Pelican Bay State Prison’s Security Housing Unit (SHU) had put out the word that they would be going on hungerstrike on July 1, news that traveled the length of the California system in the months beforehand. While their demands were specific to their own situation, they remained broad enough to reflect the reality of other prisoners held in iso­ lation throughout California, and so individuals and then groups in other prisons began expressing that they too would be joining the hungerstrike. Men and women with different national and organizational affiliations promised to come together in unity behind these demands (listed in the sidebar). STRIKES, RETALIATION, RESOLUTION During the first week of the strike in July, over six thousand prisoners refused state meals. Some did eat food they had bought beforehand, some took only the liquid portion of their 117 118 RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY meal (i.e. juice or milk), while others refused any sustenance whatsoever. Regardless of the degree of participation, all were acting as part of a collective rising up, signaling their solidarity with those being held in long­term isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Radical Criminology issue five H fall 2015 ISSN: 1929-7904 ISBN: 978-0692512364 a publication of the Critical Criminology Working Group at Kwantlen Polytechnic University (12666 72 Avenue, Surrey, BC V3W 2M8) www.radicalcriminology.org punctum books ✶ brooklyn, ny www.punctumbooks.com ✶ Radical Criminology ✶ Issue 5 ✶ August 2015 ✶ ISSN 1929-7904 General Editor: Jeff Shantz Feature Guest Editors: Carrie B. Sanders Public Criminology & Lauren Eisler Production Editor: PJ Lilley Advisory Board: Olga Aksyutina, Institute for African Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow; Davina Bhandar (Trent U.); Jeff Ferrell (Texas Christian U.); Hollis Johnson (Kwantlen Polytechnic U.); Michael J. Lynch (U. of South Florida); Mike CK Ma (Kwantlen Polytechnic U.); Lisa Monchalin (Kwantlen Polytechnic U.); Heidi Rimke (U.Winnipeg); Jeffrey Ian Ross (U.Baltimore); Herman Schwendinger, independent scholar cover art: 16:9clue (flickr, CC-BY) see pg. 12 Unless otherwise stated, contributions express the opinions of their writers and are not (necessarily) those of the Editors or Advisory Board. Please visit our website for more information. ✶ Contact Us ✶ email: [email protected] website: http://journal.radicalcriminology.org Mailing Kwantlen Polytechnic University, address: ATTN: Jeff Shantz, Dept. of Criminology 12666 72 Avenue | Surrey, BC, Canada V3W 2M8 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License, enabling non- commercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the published article in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution to include the author or artist’s name, date of first publication, and our journal’s name, Radical Criminology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politicized Prisoner Phenomenon
    PRISONER ATTITUDES TOWARD CRIME, POLITICS, AND THE SOCIOECONOMIC SYSTEM: THE POLITICIZED PRISONER PHENOMENON By BARRY EDWARD CARTWRIGHT •A. (honours), Simon Fraser University, 1975 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIRE• MENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of British Columbia We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1983 fc^Barry Edward Cartwright, 1983 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Anthropology & Semiology The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1WS Date 14 October 1983 ABSTRACT This study was designed to measure the degree of prisoner politicization in federal prisons in British Columbia, and to measure the association between prisoner politicization and exposure to the criminal justice system. A random sample of sixty prisoners was obtained at three federal prisons in British Columbia. The interview results were codified, analyzed by an SPSS computer program, and then reviewed extensively by the writer and the thesis supervisor before making a final de• termination of the degree of prisoner politicization.
    [Show full text]
  • ABOLITION Which Are to Be Abolished (Bianchi and Van Swaaningen, 1986)
    A ABOLITION which are to be abolished (Bianchi and van Swaaningen, 1986). Abolitionists question the ethical calibre Definition of a state that intentionally and systemati- In criminology and criminal justice, the term cally inflicts pain upon other people. They ‘abolition’ currently refers to the attempt to point out that, because generally accepted do away with punitive responses to criminal- goals of general and special prevention can- ized problems. It is the first step in the aboli- not be supported with empirical data, the tionist strategy, followed by a plea for dispute credibility of the whole penal rationale is at settlement, redress and social justice. In more stake. Depenalization (pushing back the general terms it refers to the abolition of state punitive character of social reactions) and (supported) institutions which are no longer decriminalization (against the labelling of felt to be legitimate. Historically, the term has social problems as crimes) are the central been used in the fight against slavery, torture, strategies of abolition. Stan Cohen (1988) has prostitution, capital punishment and prison. identified five other ‘destructuring moves’ which are part of the politics of abolition: decarceration (away from prison), diversion Distinctive Features (away from the institution), decategorization Though the literal meaning of the verb ‘to (away from offender typologies), delegaliza- abolish’ suggests differently, penal abolition tion (away from the state) and deprofession- should not be interpreted in absolute terms. alization (away from the expert). In a next, Abolitionists do not argue that the police positive or reconstructive phase, a distinc- or courts should be abolished. The point is tion is made between abolitionism as a way that crime is not to be set apart from other, of thinking (an alternative way of under- non-criminalized, social problems and that standing the problem of crime and punish- the social exclusion of ‘culprits’ seldom solves ment) and as a way of acting (a radical problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Remixing in Criminology: Tracing Durkheim and Marx's Influence on Etiological Theories of Crime
    Conceptual Remixing in Criminology: Tracing Durkheim and Marx's Influence on Etiological Theories of Crime By: Cindy Brooks Dollar This is the accepted version of the following article: Dollar, C.B. (2014). Conceptual Remixing in Criminology: Tracing Durkheim and Marx’s Influence on Etiological Theories of Crime. Sociology Compass, 8(10), 1157-1166. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12205, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12205. ***© Wiley. Reprinted with permission. No further reproduction is authorized without written permission from Wiley. This version of the document is not the version of record. Figures and/or pictures may be missing from this format of the document. *** Abstract: Sociologists have previously argued that our current knowledge and inquiries stem from our standing on the shoulders of giants. Exactly how this occurs, however, may be less clear. This paper identifies how the works of two of the most valued classical social theorists – Durkheim and Marx – have influenced theories of crime causation. In doing so, I reveal that classical social theory continues to be relevant in the advancement of criminological thought. Identifying this lineage is crucial in developing more informed research and policy on crime and social control, which is especially important given the widespread interest in crime and delinquency among students (and citizens more generally). Keywords: Criminology | Social Theory | Crime Causation | Émile Durkheim | Karl Marx | Travis Hirschi Article: Scholars have aptly argued that our knowledge is cumulative yet progressive. Such an argument emphasizes the importance of situating current understandings and inquiries in a historical context. This paper details classical influences on etiological theories of crime in hopes of revealing the lineage of criminological thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminological Theory in Context
    Criminological Theory in Context 00_Chamberlain_Prelims.indd 1 12/1/2014 3:15:18 PM POSTMODERN CRITICAL 8 STANDPOINTS AND THE CRIMINAL LIFE COURSE CHAPTER CONTENTS Chapter overview 143 Introduction: Critical criminology revisited 144 Key summary points 149 Further reading 149 Positivism and realism, postmodernism and anti-realism 150 Narrative and life story research within criminology 152 Key summary points 153 Further reading 154 Life Course criminology 155 Moffitt’s Dual Taxonomy 155 Hirschi’s Social Control Theory 157 Sampson and Laub’s Age Graded Stability and Change Model 158 Targeted Life Course interventions 159 Key summary points 160 Further reading 161 Self-study task 161 CHAPTER OVERVIEW The chapter explores the development of the contemporary Critical criminologi- cal concern with the life course of offending behaviour. It begins by outlining how (Continued) 08_Chamberlain_Ch-08.indd 143 12/1/2014 10:16:23 AM (Continued) Critical criminological positions encompass a range of differing approaches, all of which have their own particular emphases and nuances, and furthermore, they have been categorised under various headings, including Marxist criminology, Radical criminology, Left Realism, Feminist criminology, Sociological criminology or the Sociology of Deviance, Peacemaking criminology and Cultural criminology, to name but a few. This chapter then discusses how influencing the develop- ment of Critical standpoints in criminology and the emphasis on the duality of structure has been the rejection of positivism and the emergence of postmodern sensibilities. This leads on to discuss how postmodernist anti-realist viewpoints accord equal validity to all perspectives and voices. This position is congruent with contemporary Critical criminology perspectives, such as Cultural criminology, as well as qualitative research methodologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The J Oumal of Prisoners on Prisons
    The Prisoner As Ethnographer: The Joumal of Prisoners on Prisons Robert Gaucher A number of years ago I was asked by a colleague active in prison volunteer work to wri te to a prisoner who was in the "hole" in a Canadian penitentiary. She thought I might help, at least by providing moral support for the duration of his "dosed" confinement. Mter the exchange of a number of letters I noted a confusion on the part of the prisoner. What exactly was a criminologist - forensic scientists, an investi- gator of the so-called "criminal-mind", or possibly a Sher- lock Holmes type who worked with the police? As one of Canada's first members of the new school of critical crimi- nologists I appreciated his confusion. He was touching on a question which permeates our work: what is the focus and subject matter of radical criminology? This confusion was compounded by our different perspectives. His was a personally reactive damning of the prison, while mine was a more distanced, theorized condemnation of the whole system of criminaljustice industry. In our correspondence over the next year we discussed these issues at length and we grew in our understanding of the phenomenon of imprisonment. Mter many years of working ",ithin crimi- nology, I had corne close to conduding that there was little left for me to learn. The self-discovery that this man, and prisoners generally, still had much they could teach me was intellectually and academically liberating. My response was to reconsider the development of radical criminology. In ''Whose Side Are We On?", How- 49 ard Becker (1967) made a strong argument for taking the part of the criminalized/prisoner, including taking what s/he had to say seriously and following through on it.
    [Show full text]