ODONTOGENIC TUMORS: WHERE ARE WE in 2017? Odontojen Tümörler

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ODONTOGENIC TUMORS: WHERE ARE WE in 2017? Odontojen Tümörler S10 J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S10-S30. http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.52886 INVITED REVIEW ODONTOGENIC TUMORS: WHERE ARE WE IN 2017? Odontojen Tümörler: 2017 Yılında Neredeyiz? John M WRIGHT 1, Merva SOLUK-TEKKEŞIN 2 Received: 05/07/2017 Accepted:04/08/2017 ABSTRACT ÖZ Odontogenic tumors are a heterogeneous group of Odontojen tümörler, klinik davranışlarına ve lesions of diverse clinical behavior and histopathologic histopatolojik özelliklerine göre hamartomdan maligniteye types, ranging from hamartomatous lesions to malignancy. kadar değişen heterojen bir grup lezyondur. Bu tümörler, Because odontogenic tumors arise from the tissues which dişleri oluşturan dokulardan köken aldığı için çenelere make our teeth, they are unique to the jaws, and by extension özgüdür ve genellikle diş hekimliğini ilgilendirir. Odontojen almost unique to dentistry. Odontogenic tumors, as in normal tümörler normal odontogenezis sürecinde olduğu gibi odontogenesis, are capable of inductive interactions between odontojen ektomezenkim ve epitel arasındaki karşılıklı odontogenic ectomesenchyme and epithelium, and the indüksiyon mekanizmasıyla ortaya çıkar ve bu tümörlerin classification of odontogenic tumors is essentially based sınıflamasında bu indüksiyon mekanizması baz alınır. on this interaction. The last update of these tumors was Odontojen tümörlerle ilgili en son güncelleme 2017 published in early 2017. According to this classification, yılının başında yapılmıştır. Bu sınıflamaya göre; iyi huylu benign odontogenic tumors are classified as follows: tümörler köken aldıkları diş germi yapısına bağlı olarak Epithelial, mesenchymal (ectomesenchymal), or mixed epitelyal, mezenkimal (ektomezenkimal) veya mikst olarak depending on which component of the tooth germ gives sınıflanmıştır. Kötü huylu tümörler ise oldukça enderdir rise to the neoplasm. Malignant odontogenic tumors are ve iyi huylu tümör sınıflamasına benzer şekilde epitelyal, quite rare and named similarly according to whether the mezenkimal veya her iki komponentinde malign olmasına epithelial or mesenchymal or both components is malignant. göre adlandırılırlar. Bu derlemenin amacı odontojen The goal of this review is to discuss the updated changes to tümörleri son güncellemeler eşliğinde tartışmak ve en sık odontogenic tumors and to review the more common types görülen tipleri klinik ve radyolojik resimleri ile gözden with clinical and radiological illustrations. geçirmektir. Keywords: Odontogenic tumors; odontogenesis; Anahtar kelimeler: Odontojen tümörler; odontogenezis; update; ameloblastoma; odontomas güncelleme; ameloblastom; odontom 1 Department of Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dentistry, Texas A&M University, Dallas, TX, USA 2 Department of Tumor Pathology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey How to cite: Wright JM, Soluk Tekkesin M. Odontogenic tumors. Where are we in 2017?. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51(3 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Suppl 1):S10-S30. S11 Wright JM & Soluk Tekkeşin M Introduction benign odontogenic tumors seem to arise de novo, whereas the malignant odontogenic tumors may Odontogenic tumors (OT) are a heterogeneous arise de novo but more often arise from their benign group of lesions of diverse clinical behavior and precursor. The classification of odontogenic tumors is histopathologic types, ranging from hamartomatous essentially based on interactions between odontogenic lesions to malignancy. OT are derived from ectomesenchyme and epithelium. This dynamic ectomesenchymal and/or epithelial tissues that classification is constantly renewed with the addition constitute the tooth-forming apparatus. Like normal of new entities, and the removal of some older entities. odontogenesis, the odontogenic tumors represent The last update of these tumors was published in early inductive interactions between odontogenic 2017 (3). Table 1 and 2 summarize the changes of ectomesenchyme and epithelium (1, 2). Therefore odontogenic tumors from the first WHO classification OT are found within the jaw bones (central types) to date (3-5). In this review, we discuss odontogenic or in the mucosal tissue overlying tooth-bearing tumors relative to the latest updates and focus on the areas (peripheral types). OT are basically divided more common tumors with clinical and radiological into two primary categories; malignant and benign illustrations. but the etiology is unknown. The majority of Table 1. Historically WHO benign odontogenic tumor classification from 1971 to 2017. Please note that origin based sub-classification (epithelial, mixed and mesenchymal), which is still in use in 2017, was first defined in 1992. 1971 WHO classification 1992 WHO classification 2005 WHO classification 2017 WHO classification Ameloblastoma Epithelial origin Epithelial origin Epithelial origin Calcifying epithelial odontogenic Ameloblastoma Ameloblastoma, solid / multicystic Ameloblastoma tumor type Ameloblastic fibroma Squamous odontogenic tumor Ameloblastoma, extraosseous / Ameloblastoma, unicystic peripheral type type Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor Calcifying epithelial odontogenic Ameloblastoma, desmoplastic type Ameloblastoma, extraosseous/ (adeno-ameloblastoma) tumor (Pindborg tumor) peripheral type Calcifying odontogenic cyst Clear cell odontogenic tumor Ameloblastoma, unicystic type Metastasizing (malignant) ameloblastoma Dentinoma Squamous odontogenic tumor Squamous odontogenic tumor Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma Calcifying epithelial odontogenic Calcifying epithelial tumor odontogenic tumor Odonto-ameloblastoma Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor Complex odontoma Keratocystic odontogenic tumor Compound odontoma Mixed origin Mixed origin Mixed origin Fibroma (odontogenic fibroma) Ameloblastic fibroma Ameloblastic fibroma Ameloblastic fibroma Myxoma (myxofibroma) Ameloblastic fibrodentinoma (dentinoma) Ameloblastic fibrodentinoma Primordial odontogenic and ameloblastic fibro-odontoma tumor Cementomas Odontoameloblastoma Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma Odontoma, Complex type a. Benign cementoblastoma (true Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor Odontoma, Complex type Odontoma, Compound type cementoma) b.Cementifying fibroma Calcifying odontogenic cyst Odontoma, Compound type Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor c. Periapical cemental ysplasia Complex odontoma Odontoameloblastoma (periapical fibrous dysplasia) d. Giganti form cementoma (familial Compound odontoma Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor multiple cementomas) Melanotic neuro-ectodermal tumor of infancy Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor Mesenchymal origin Mesenchymal origin Mesenchymal origin Odontogenic fibroma Odontogenic fibroma Odontogenic fibroma Myxoma (odontogenic myxoma, Odontogenic myxoma / Odontogenic myxoma/ myxofibroma) myxofibroma myxofibroma Benign cementoblastoma Cementoblastoma Cementoblastoma Cemento-ossifying fibroma S12 Clinicopathologic review of OT Table 2. Historically WHO malign odontogenic tumor classification from 1971 to 2017. 1971 WHO 1992 WHO 2017 WHO 2005 WHO classification classification classification classification Odontogenic Odontogenic Odontogenic Odontogenic carcinomas carcinomas carcinomas carcinomas Malignant Malignant Metastasizing (malignant) Ameloblastic ameloblastoma ameloblastoma ameloblastoma carcinoma Primary intra-osseous Primary intraosseous Ameloblastic carcinoma – Primary intraosseous carcinoma carcinoma primary type carcinoma, NOS Other carcinomas arising from odontogenic Malignant variants Ameloblastic carcinoma– Sclerosing epithelium, including of other odontogenic secondary type, odontogenic those arising from epithelial tumors intraosseous carcinoma odontogenic cysts Malignant changes in Ameloblastic carcinoma– Clear cell odontogenic Odontogenic sarcomas odontogenic cysts secondary type, peripheral carcinoma Ameloblastic Primary intraosseous Odontogenic Ghost cell odontogenic fibrosarcoma squamous cell carcinoma sarcomas carcinoma (ameloblastic sarcoma) – solid type Ameloblastic Primary intraosseous Ameloblastic fibrosarcoma squamous cell carcinoma Odontogenic odontosarcoma (ameloblastic derived from keratocystic carcinosarcoma sarcoma) odontogenic tumor Primary intraosseous Ameloblastic squamous cell carcinoma Odontogenic fibrodentino–and derived from odontogenic sarcomas fibro-odontosarcoma cysts Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma Odontogenic sarcomas Ameloblastic fibrosarcoma Ameloblastic fibrodentino–and fibro- odontosarcoma Odontogenic benign tumors, epithelial common mutation (6). WHO 2017 classification divided ameloblastoma into four categories; Ameloblastoma conventional, extraosseous / peripheral, unicystic, and metastasizing ameloblastoma. Ameloblastoma is a benign but locally aggressive epithelial neoplasm that is one of the most common Clinical features odontogenic tumors. Current genetic studies show mutations in genes that belong to MAPK pathway Conventional ameloblastoma usually shows slow, in many ameloblastomas. BRAFV600E is the most painless expansion (Figure 1). The posterior area of S13 Wright JM & Soluk Tekkeşin M mandible is the most common location. They tend different clinical features, including a radiolucent- to grow in a buccolingual direction, resulting in radiopaque appearance, and predilection for the significant expansion. The signs and symptoms are anterior jaws, especially maxilla (8). variable; including malocclusion, facial deformity, Unicystic ameloblastoma is a subtype of soft tissue invasion
Recommended publications
  • Glossary for Narrative Writing
    Periodontal Assessment and Treatment Planning Gingival description Color: o pink o erythematous o cyanotic o racial pigmentation o metallic pigmentation o uniformity Contour: o recession o clefts o enlarged papillae o cratered papillae o blunted papillae o highly rolled o bulbous o knife-edged o scalloped o stippled Consistency: o firm o edematous o hyperplastic o fibrotic Band of gingiva: o amount o quality o location o treatability Bleeding tendency: o sulcus base, lining o gingival margins Suppuration Sinus tract formation Pocket depths Pseudopockets Frena Pain Other pathology Dental Description Defective restorations: o overhangs o open contacts o poor contours Fractured cusps 1 ww.links2success.biz [email protected] 914-303-6464 Caries Deposits: o Type . plaque . calculus . stain . matera alba o Location . supragingival . subgingival o Severity . mild . moderate . severe Wear facets Percussion sensitivity Tooth vitality Attrition, erosion, abrasion Occlusal plane level Occlusion findings Furcations Mobility Fremitus Radiographic findings Film dates Crown:root ratio Amount of bone loss o horizontal; vertical o localized; generalized Root length and shape Overhangs Bulbous crowns Fenestrations Dehiscences Tooth resorption Retained root tips Impacted teeth Root proximities Tilted teeth Radiolucencies/opacities Etiologic factors Local: o plaque o calculus o overhangs 2 ww.links2success.biz [email protected] 914-303-6464 o orthodontic apparatus o open margins o open contacts o improper
    [Show full text]
  • An Extrafollicular Adenomatoid Odontogenic Tumor Mimicking a Periapical Cyst
    Hindawi Case Reports in Radiology Volume 2018, Article ID 6987050, 5 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6987050 Case Report An Extrafollicular Adenomatoid Odontogenic Tumor Mimicking a Periapical Cyst Farzaneh Mosavat ,1 Roxana Rashtchian,1 Negar Zeini ,1 Daryoush Goodarzi Pour,1 Shabnam Mohammed Charlie,1 and Nazanin Mahdavi2 1 Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Correspondence should be addressed to Negar Zeini; [email protected] Received 4 April 2017; Accepted 13 July 2017; Published 1 January 2018 Academic Editor: Soon Tye Lim Copyright © 2018 Farzaneh Mosavat et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT) is a rare noninvasive odontogenic tumor that occurs mostly in the second decade of life. Based on its tooth association, AOT can be classifed into three categories of follicular, extrafollicular, and peripheral types; the follicular classifcation is considered as the most common type of AOT. Tis study reported a large extrafollicular case of AOT in a 40-year-old female. She was asymptomatic and tumor was detected accidentally by her dental practitioner. Since the panoramic radiograph showed a well-defned unilocular radiolucent lesion, we observed radiopaque spots within the lesion by using cone beam computed tomography. Te extrafollicular type can mimic a periapical radiolucent lesion. 1. Introduction attached to the gingival structures [9].
    [Show full text]
  • Denture Technology Curriculum Objectives
    Health Licensing Agency 700 Summer St. NE, Suite 320 Salem, Oregon 97301-1287 Telephone (503) 378-8667 FAX (503) 585-9114 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.Oregon.gov/OHLA As of July 1, 2013 the Board of Denture Technology in collaboration with Oregon Students Assistance Commission and Department of Education has determined that 103 quarter hours or the equivalent semester or trimester hours is equivalent to an Associate’s Degree. A minimum number of credits must be obtained in the following course of study or educational areas: • Orofacial Anatomy a minimum of 2 credits; • Dental Histology and Embryology a minimum of 2 credits; • Pharmacology a minimum of 3 credits; • Emergency Care or Medical Emergencies a minimum of 1 credit; • Oral Pathology a minimum of 3 credits; • Pathology emphasizing in Periodontology a minimum of 2 credits; • Dental Materials a minimum of 5 credits; • Professional Ethics and Jurisprudence a minimum of 1 credit; • Geriatrics a minimum of 2 credits; • Microbiology and Infection Control a minimum of 4 credits; • Clinical Denture Technology a minimum of 16 credits which may be counted towards 1,000 hours supervised clinical practice in denture technology defined under OAR 331-405-0020(9); • Laboratory Denture Technology a minimum of 37 credits which may be counted towards 1,000 hours supervised clinical practice in denture technology defined under OAR 331-405-0020(9); • Nutrition a minimum of 4 credits; • General Anatomy and Physiology minimum of 8 credits; and • General education and electives a minimum of 13 credits. Curriculum objectives which correspond with the required course of study are listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathology of Tumours of the Oral Tissues Tion and Illustrations of the Lesion Appear a Limited Amount of New Material
    J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.25.7.611-a on 1 July 1972. Downloaded from Book reviews 611 This is indeed one of the major prob- In comparisonwith the previous edition, Book reviews lems, and coupled with this is the prob- the text has now been set in a much more lem of variations in terminology. For attractive typeface. About a dozen of the example, the author uses the term illustrations have been changed, either to 'odonto-ameloblastoma' but the descrip- give a better picture, or to make way for Pathology of Tumours of the Oral Tissues tion and illustrations of the lesion appear a limited amount of new material. 2nd ed. By R. B. Lucas. (Pp. x 386; 123 significantly different from those given Almost all of the clinical photographs figures. £7-00.) London: Churchill Living- in the recent WHO publication on the are very good. There is some variation in stone. 1972. histological classification of odontogenic technical quality, but the cases shown are tumours. typical. The photomicrographs are not all I must start this review by 'declaring an Any discussion of odontogenic tumours as sharp as they should be, and some of interest' as I had the pleasure of reading is likely to run into difficulties when the the sections look very thick, but the mag- both editions in manuscript; however, 'cementoma' group is reached, because nifications are particularly well chosen to as the author says in the preface, the there is such a variety of these lesions display the essential features of the lesions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Drugs That May Prove Useful for Treatment of Mucositis in Patients
    Mock Academic Fellowship Examination American Academy of Oral Medicine THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORAL MEDICINE INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF NEW YORK STATE (Founded 1945) 1. Drugs that may prove useful for treatment of mucositis in patients undergoing head and neck radiation therapy are: A) Chlorhexidine B) Amifostine C) Pilocarpine hydrochloride D) B and C E) None of the above 2. Post radiation osteonecrosis of the jaws can be characterized as tissues which are: A) Hypervascular B) Hypocellular C) Hyponatremic C) Hyperosmotic 3. Topical agents that may be useful in patients who develop oral mucositis secondary to head and neck radiation are: A) Topical doxepin B) Topical Morphine C) Topical benzydamine D) All of the above 4. The most common benign tumor of salivary glands is: A) Oncocytoma B) Basal cell adenoma C) Monomorphic adenoma D) Pleomorphic adenoma 5. The most common sustained cardiac dysrhymia is: A) Premature ventricular contraction B) Wolff-Parkinson White Syndrome C) Supraventricular tachycardia D) Atrial fibrillation 1 Mock Academic Fellowship Examination 6. The ideal time to provide elective dental treatment for patients who are receiving renal dialysis is: A) Immediately following dialysis B) The day of dialysis C) On a non-dialysis day as early as possible from the next dialysis treatment D) Just before dialysis E) Anytime after awakening 7. A patient presents for extraction of 3 carious teeth. Past medical history includes chronic renal failure, hemodialysis, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and total knee replacement. Appropriate dental care would include: A) Recording vital signs prior to treatment B) Use of adjunctive hemostatic agents at the time of surgery C) Pre-operative antibiotic consideration D) All of the above 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Benign Cementoblastoma Associated with an Impacted Third Molar Inside Maxillary Sinus
    Hindawi Case Reports in Surgery Volume 2018, Article ID 7148479, 5 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7148479 Case Report Benign Cementoblastoma Associated with an Impacted Third Molar inside Maxillary Sinus 1 2 1 Rafael Correia Cavalcante, Maria Fernanda Pivetta Petinati, Edimar Rafael de Oliveira, 1 3 3 Isabela Polesi Bergamaschi, Nelson Luis Barbosa Rebelatto , Leandro Klüppel, 3,4 3 Rafaela Scariot , and Delson João da Costa 1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Resident at Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil 2Dental Clinic Mastering Degree Student at Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil 3Professor of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department at Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil 4Professor of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department at Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil Correspondence should be addressed to Rafaela Scariot; [email protected] Received 7 October 2018; Accepted 30 October 2018; Published 19 November 2018 Academic Editor: Fabio Roccia Copyright © 2018 Rafael Correia Cavalcante et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Introduction. Cementoblastoma is a rare and benign odontogenic mesenchymal tumor, often characterized by the formation of cementum-like tissue produced by neoplastic cementoblasts attached to or around the roots of a tooth. Case Report. 22-year-old male patient was referred to the Federal University of Paraná after occasional finding on a routine panoramic radiograph. Clinical examination suggested no alterations. Medical and family history presented no alterations as well. Computed tomographic (CT) showed the presence of a radiopaque area associated with the roots of the impacted third molar measuring 15 mm × 10 mm inside the left maxillary sinus.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Insights in Oral Pathology
    PRACTICAL INSIGHTS IN ORAL PATHOLOGY Kirk Y. Hirata, MD January 13, 2017 ROAD TO THE PODIUM? • 1985-90: LLUSM • 1990-94: Anatomic and Clinical Pathology Residency, UH John A. Burns School of Medicine • 1994-95: Hematopathology Fellowship, Scripps Clinic, San Diego • July 1995: HPL - new business, niche? ORAL PATHOLOGY • outpatient biopsies, some were from dentists • s/o inflammation, “benign odontogenic cyst”, etc • no service to general dentists or oral surgeons • wife was a dentist, residency at QMC 1990-91 • idea? ORAL PATHOLOGY • telephone calls • lunches (marketing) • textbooks • courses, including microscopy • began to acquire cases • QMC dental resident teaching once a month AFTER 21 YEARS • established myself in the community as an “oral pathologist” • QMC Dental Residency Program has been recognized • 7TH edition of Jordan (1999) • UCSF consultation service I feel fortunate to have joined this group of outstanding dermato- pathologists. I believe that my training, experience and expertise in oral and maxillofacial pathology expands the scope and breadth of services that we are able to offer the medical and dental community for their diagnostic pathology needs. I initially trained as a dentist at the University of Toronto that was followed by an internship at the Toronto Western Hospital (now the University Health Network). Following training in anatomic pathology I completed a residency in oral and maxillofacial pathology under the direction of Dr. Jim Main. I also completed a fellowship in oral medicine and then a Master of Science degree in oral pathology. I was fortunate to be able to train with Professor Paul Speight at the University of London were I was awarded a PhD degree in Experimental Pathology.
    [Show full text]
  • Ossifying Fibroma–Cementoma of Jaw. Differences in Histopathological
    otolaryngologia polska 66 (2012) 359–362 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/otpol Case report/Kazuistyka Ossifying fibroma–cementoma of jaw. Differences in histopathological nomenclature Wło´kniak kostnieja˛cy – cementoma szcze˛ki. Ro´z˙nice w nomenklaturze histopatologicznej Wiesław Konopka 1,2,*,Małgorzata S´ miechura 1,Małgorzata Struz˙ycka 1, Marcin Kozakiewicz 3, Monika Dzieniecka 4 1 Department of Otolaryngology Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Lodz, Poland 2 Department of Audiology, Phoniatry and Paediatric Otolaryngology Medical University of Lodz, Poland Head: Wiesław Konopka 3 Department of Maxillar and Facial Surgery Medical University of Lodz, Poland Head: Marcin Kozakiewicz 4 Department of Patomorphology Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Lodz, Poland Head: Andrzej Kulig article info abstract Article history: Ossifying fibroma (cementoma) is a tumor of mesenchymal origin which represents about Received: 25.05.2012 1% of odontogenic tumors. It is commonly found in patients under 25, more often so in Accepted: 26.06.2012 women. As its growth is slow and painless, it is usually accidentally detected by dental Published on line: 04.07.2012 radiological examination. The aim of our study was to present the histopathological dilemma concerning the naming of a rare odontogenic tumor of the jaw. The authors Keywords: present a rare jaw tumor, a benign ossifying fibroma, in the maxilla of a 12-year-old girl Cementoma treated surgically, and they discuss the difficulty in making a definitive histopathological Histopathological nomenclature diagnosis. The clinical and histological criteria for identifying this type of tumor are still Jaw tumor uncertain, as the most common sites, that is the tooth-bearing areas of the mandible, are very rare in the maxilla.
    [Show full text]
  • Benign Cementoblastoma: a Case Report
    C LINICAL P RACTICE Benign Cementoblastoma: A Case Report • Bruce R. Pynn, M.Sc., DDS, FRCD(C) • • Tim D. Sands, DDS, Dip. OMFS • • Grace Bradley, DDS, M.Sc., FRCD(C) • Abstract The case of a 23-year-old with a benign cementoblastoma is presented. The clinicopathologic features, treatment and prognosis are discussed and a brief review of the literature is presented. Although this neoplasm is rare, the dental practitioner should be aware of the clinical features that will lead to its early diagnosis and treatment. MeSH Key Words: case report; mandibular neoplasms/diagnosis; odontogenic tumours/diagnosis © J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67:260-2 This article has been peer reviewed. enign cementoblastoma is a rare odontogenic attached in toto. The periphery of the bony cavity was curet- neoplasm of mesenchymal origin. The World ted and the wound was closed primarily. B Health Organization has classified benign cemento- The specimen was submitted for histologic evaluation. blastoma and cementifying fibroma as the only true cemen- Gross examination showed a noncarious mandibular tal neoplasms.1 The benign cementoblastoma should be premolar with the root apex embedded in a spherical mass distinguished from non-neoplastic processes that may also of hard tissue (Figs. 2a and 2b). A radiograph of the speci- produce a radiopaque lesion around the root apex, such as men revealed resorption of the apical third of the root and periapical cemental dysplasia or condensing osteitis.2 fusion of the resorbed root to a radiopaque mass with a radiating pattern at the periphery. Case Report Histologically, the lesion consisted of broad trabeculae of A 23-year-old Native Canadian woman presented with sparsely cellular cementum.
    [Show full text]
  • Florid Cemento-Osseous Dysplasia: a Contraindication to Orthodontic Treatment in Compromised Areas
    orthodontic insight Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: a contraindication to orthodontic treatment in compromised areas Alberto Consolaro1,2, Sergio Rafael Baggio Paschoal3, Jose Burgos Ponce4, Dario A. Oliveira Miranda5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.3.026-034.oin Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia is a sclerosing disease that affects the mandible, especially the alveolar process, and that is, in most cases, bilateral; however, in some cases it affects up to three or even four quadrants. During the disease, normal bone is replaced with a thinly formed, irregularly distributed tissue peppered with radiolucent areas of soft tissue. Newly formed bone does not seem to invade periodontal space, but, in several images, it is confused with the roots, without, however, compromising pulp vitality or tooth position in the dental arch. There is no replacement resorption, not even when the images suggest dentoalveolar ankylosis. Orthodontists should make an accurate diagnosis when planning treatments, as this disease, when fully established, is one of the extremely rare situations in which orthodontic treatment is contraindicated. This contraindication is due to: (a) procedures such as the installment of mini-implants and mini-plaques, surgical maneuvers to apply traction to unerupted teeth and extractions should be avoided to prevent contamination of the affected bone with bacteria from the oral microbiota; and (b) tooth movement in the areas affected is practically impossible because of bone disorganization in the alveolar process, characterized by high bone density and the resulting cotton-wool appearance. Densely mineralized and disorganized bone is unable to remodel or develop in an organized way in the periodontal ligaments and the alveolar process.
    [Show full text]
  • DENTINO JURNAL KEDOKTERAN GIGI Vol IV
    64 DENTINO JURNAL KEDOKTERAN GIGI Vol IV. No 1. Maret 2019 THE VARIANCE OF RADIOPAQUE IMAGES COMMONLY FOUND IN PERIAPICAL LESION USING PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUE (Review article) Indra G1, Ria F2, Lusi E, Azhari2 1Residence at Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Specialist Programme, Faculty of Dentistry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Padjadjaran University Bandung, Indonesia ABSTRACT Background: Two pathological views are presented in radiographic imaging: radiolucency and radiopacity. In radiographic examination, radiopaque lesions are reported as the most common manifestation to be found. Opaque lesions are displayed into various depictions thus more specific examination is required to distinguish respective lesions. Objectives: Investigate radiopacity aspect of periapical lesions using literature review to aid dental practitioners obtain final diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and identification of each periapical opaque lesion. Discussion: Assessing respective matter about lucent and opaque lesion images in periapical tissue, this review resulted in the identification of elusive characterization in each opaque lesion. Conclucion: Radiographically, each diagnosis possesses particular characteristic which differ each periapical opaque lesion from another. Keyword: Opaque lesion characteristic, periapical opaque lesion, periapical radiograph Correspondence: Indra Gunawan, c/o: Residence of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Specialist Programme, Faculty
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Periodontal Terms.Pdf
    THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PERIODONTOLOGY Glossary of Periodontal Te rms 4th Edition Copyright 200 I by The American Academy of Periodontology Suite 800 737 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60611-2690 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise without the express written permission of the publisher. ISBN 0-9264699-3-9 The first two editions of this publication were published under the title Glossary of Periodontic Terms as supplements to the Journal of Periodontology. First edition, January 1977 (Volume 48); second edition, November 1986 (Volume 57). The third edition was published under the title Glossary vf Periodontal Terms in 1992. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The fourth edition of the Glossary of Periodontal Terms represents four years of intensive work by many members of the Academy who generously contributed their time and knowledge to its development. This edition incorporates revised definitions of periodontal terms that were introduced at the 1996 World Workshop in Periodontics, as well as at the 1999 International Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions. A review of the classification system from the 1999 Workshop has been included as an Appendix to the Glossary. Particular recognition is given to the members of the Subcommittee to Revise the Glossary of Periodontic Terms (Drs. Robert E. Cohen, Chair; Angelo Mariotti; Michael Rethman; and S. Jerome Zackin) who developed the revised material. Under the direction of Dr. Robert E. Cohen, the Committee on Research, Science and Therapy (Drs. David L.
    [Show full text]