DOCSLIB.ORG

The Costs of Conflict: the Impact on China of a Future War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Costs of Conflict: the Impact on China of a Future War THE COSTS OF CONFLICT: THE IMPACT ON CHINA OF A FUTURE WAR Edited by Andrew Scobell October 2001 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications and Production Office by calling commercial (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or via the Internet at [email protected]. ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://carlisle-www.army. mil/usassi/welcome.htm. ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-072-9 ii CONTENTS Foreword Ambassador James R. Lilley ........... v 1. Introduction Andrew Scobell and Larry M. Wortzel ...... 1 2. Chinese Perceptions of the Costs of a Conflict David M. Finkelstein ............... 9 3. Conflicting Tendencies: Economic Integration Versus Political Impasse Ralph N. Clough ................. 29 4. Taiwan Dependence: The Strategic Dimension of Cross-Strait Trade and Investment John Tkacik ................... 35 5. The Costs of China’s Military Conflict: The Korean and Japanese Dimensions Taeho Kim .................... 63 6. The Impact of a Conflict on China’s Relations with Southeast Asia and Australia Carlyle A. Thayer ................ 79 7. Taiwan and the Chinese Military Ellis Joffe .................... 111 8. Homeland Defense with Taiwanese Characteristics: President Chen Shui-bian’s New Defense Concept Alexander Chieh-cheng Huang ......... 129 9. The Arms Control and Ballistic Missile Defense Costs of a Chinese Conflict Wendy Frieman ................ 163 10. “Eating Imperial Grain”?: The Ongoing Divestiture of the Chinese Military-Business Complex, 1998-2000 James Mulvenon ................ 187 About the Contributors ............... 217 iii FOREWORD There is a need for the United States to move the debate over the challenge China presents us beyond the dispositions of the attention grabbing advocates: the rationalizers who explain Chinese actions in benign terms with their own political or academic motives, or the denigrators, who are “The Chinese Are Coming” school—to wit: China is belligerent, a threat, in short, a monster. It is increasingly important for Americans to think carefully about the vast complexities of the U.S.-China relationship, and the calculations that go into forming courses of action. The Chinese have to consider some of the same realities we do when planning military actions and strategy. The key question is: will China’s so-called first priority of economic development and its resulting influence on domestic social stability curtail China’s continuing reliance on military force as a means of exerting its influence? In addition, will economic development enhance China’s comprehensive national power and thus contribute to some of China’s more unhealthy goals, such as dominating the South China Seas, seizing Taiwan by force, or grabbing the Senkaku Islands from Japan? Is the China-Taiwan economic dynamic strong enough to offset military adventurism? The rationalizers often say security and sovereignty will always trump economic determinism, others insist economic factors will change China—and thus decrease the chances of war, especially with China winning the 2008 Olympics. How this dilemma is managed by the United States, China, and Taiwan will affect the future of Asia, and perhaps the world. We have tried to present in this book factual and analytical essays which stress the need for squarely addressing these questions. So, this volume should make a valuable contribution by addressing the issue of what would be at stake for China if Beijing were to pursue military solutions. The chapters that follow were originally presented at a conference at the U.S. Army War College (USAWC) held in December 2000. It is v the tenth annual conference on the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) that I have organized under the auspices of the American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation. This is the third PLA conference volume to be published by the USAWC Strategic Studies Institute. I commend it to you. Ambassador James R. Lilley Senior Fellow American Enterprise Institute vi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Scobell Larry M. Wortzel A widely held belief is that China will not use force against Taiwan. Frequently, one of two major assumptions is made to justify this assertion: first, Chinese leaders realize that the economic cost of such an operation would be unacceptable; second, China’s leaders recognize that, for at least the next decade or so, any attempt to seize Taiwan would be doomed to failure. Both these assumptions are questionable and indeed downright dangerous. The basis for the former proposition is the assumption that China has too much to lose economically to risk a conflict over Taiwan. Certainly, China’s leaders have placed the highest priority on economic growth over the past 2 decades. China’s economy has gradually been growing out of the centrally planned model, and more and more production and pricing are being determined by the market. 1 And China has become increasingly intertwined with the global economic system through trade and investment. 2 Moreover, economic ties increasingly bind the People’s Republic of China (PRC) together with the larger Chinese diaspora, particularly with the territories of Hong Kong and Macao and with the island of Taiwan—what has become known as “Greater China” or the “China Circle.” 3 These burgeoning cross-strait economic links have continued to grow during the 1990s. This growing economic interdependence is examined in detail in the chapters by Ralph Clough and John Tkacik in this volume. The latter assumption, that China must wait a decade before it is able to act against Taiwan, has recently been made by several military analysts, especially those who have focused on amphibious invasion scenarios. After 1 studying the array of forces available on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, these researchers conclude such an operation would not succeed in the foreseeable future. 4 Unfortunately, by focusing on this extreme and, in our view, least likely scenario and remaining at the operational level, these analysts miss the strategic considerations that guide China’s actions vis-à-vis Taiwan. As many researchers recognize, China, like most countries, tends to play to its strengths. And in Beijing’s view, the chances of an amphibious assault succeeding are slight. Rather than concentrate on launching a seaborne invasion of Taiwan, it is far more likely to employ its extensive arsenal of ballistic missiles to bombard the island and/or its submarine fleet to enforce a blockade. 5 Moreover, Beijing does not just have conventional military options. In addition to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) alternatives, China also can employ other elements of national power: informational, political, and even economic. 6 The above discussion begs three questions. First, “Can China afford to attack Taiwan?” According to a Chinese economic analyst in Beijing, speaking to New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman in 1996, the clear answer is: “No—it would stop investment in China, stop growth, stop our last chance to catch up with the rest of the world.” 7 But inquiring minds will not be satisfied with a single round of question and answer. Indeed, the follow up question is: “Would China under certain circumstances use military force against Taiwan no matter what the economic consequences?” The answer, according to Friedman, is “absolutely.” 8 Many analysts, including the contributors to this volume, would concur with this judgment. The third key question, posed by David Finkelstein in his contribution to this volume, is: “What price is acceptable [to China]?” This is the hardest question to answer, although as Ellis Joffe concludes in his contribution it is likely that China’s leaders are prepared to pay a high price for a war that in their minds would have a good chance of success (i.e., capture Taiwan). Thus, it would be extremely unwise to 2 dismiss China’s insistence that unification with Taiwan is a key national security objective to be achieved by force, if necessary, as merely hot air. As Joffe observes, the depth of Chinese feeling toward the Taiwan issue should not be underestimated, particularly among military leaders. Taiwan is vital for the legitimacy of the regime in Beijing as well as an important strategic asset. There are important factors that mitigate against the use of force. There is considerable internal unrest in China due to economic conditions. This unrest would increase if foreign investment dropped; if unrest increases, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would be busy protecting the Communist Party; and China would have a difficult time reconstituting its combat capabilities. Nevertheless, in the face of even more daunting problems, such as in Korea in 1950, China has resorted to military force. Other possible locations for the use of force by China in East Asia are where Beijing has territorial disputes with other states. China claims the Senkaku or Diaoyutai Islands in the East China Sea that are currently controlled by Japan. Beijing also believes it has sovereignty over vast swaths of maritime territory surrounding numerous reefs and atolls in the South China Seas that are claimed by various other countries in the region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing the Training and Operational Proficiency of China's
    C O R P O R A T I O N Assessing the Training and Operational Proficiency of China’s Aerospace Forces Selections from the Inaugural Conference of the China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) Edmund J. Burke, Astrid Stuth Cevallos, Mark R. Cozad, Timothy R. Heath For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/CF340 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9549-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface On June 22, 2015, the China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI), in conjunction with Headquarters, Air Force, held a day-long conference in Arlington, Virginia, titled “Assessing Chinese Aerospace Training and Operational Competence.” The purpose of the conference was to share the results of nine months of research and analysis by RAND researchers and to expose their work to critical review by experts and operators knowledgeable about U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTEMPORARY CHINA: a BOOK LIST (Winter 1999 — FIRST ON-LINE EDITION, MS Word, L&R Margins 0.9") by Lynn White
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: Woodrow Wilson School, Politics Department, East Asian Studies Program CONTEMPORARY CHINA: A BOOK LIST (Winter 1999 — FIRST ON-LINE EDITION, MS Word, L&R margins 0.9") by Lynn White This list of items in English has several purposes: --to help advise students' course essays, junior papers, policy workshops, and senior theses about contemporary China; --to supplement the required reading lists of the seminars WWS 576a/Pol. 536 on "Chinese Development" and Pol. 535 on "Chinese Politics," as well as the undergraduate lecture course, Pol. 362; --to provide graduate students with a list that can help their study for comprehensive exams in Chinese politics; a few of the compiler's favorite books are starred on the list, but not too much should be made of this, because some such books may be too old for students' purposes or the subjects may not be central to present interests; --to supplement a bibliography of all Asian serials in the Princeton Libraries that was compiled long ago by Frances Chen and Maureen Donovan. Students with specific research topics should definitely meet Laird Klingler, who is WWS Librarian and the world's most constructive wizard. This list cannot cover articles, but computer databases can. Rosemary Little and Mary George at Firestone are also enormously helpful. Especially for materials in Chinese, so is Martin Heijdra in Gest Library (Palmer Hall; enter up the staircase near the "hyphen" with Jones Hall). Other local resources are at institutes run by Chen Yizi and Liu Binyan (for current numbers, ask at EAS, 8-4276). Professional bibliographers are the most neglected major academic resource at Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • 心血管 研究 研讨会 Stanford-China Cardiovascular Symposium
    心血管 研究 研讨会 Stanford-China Cardiovascular Symposium September 21-22, 2017 Li Ka Shing Center | Paul Berg Hall | Stanford, CA Sponsored in part by the Chi-Li Pao Foundation 1 SCHEDULE: Day 1 8:30 am Registration & Continental Breakfast 9:00 am Opening Remarks Joseph C. Wu, MD, PhD Director, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute Simon H. Stertzer Professor of Medicine and Radiology, Stanford 9:05 am Welcome from the School of Medicine Lloyd B. Minor, MD Carl and Elizabeth Naumann Professor Dean of Stanford University School of Medicine 9:10 am Welcome from Stanford Health Care David Entwistle, MHSA President and CEO of Stanford Health Care 9:15 am Welcome from Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Christopher G. Dawes, MBA President and CEO of Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital 9:20 am Keynote Introduction to Keynote Speaker by Simon H. Stertzer, MD Professor of Medicine, Emeritus, Stanford The Cardiovascular Disease Continuum: Nearly 30 Years Later Victor J. Dzau, MD President, National Academy of Medicine James B. Duke Professor of Medicine, Duke University CARDIAC SURGERY Moderator: Anson Lee, MD Assistant Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery Stanford University 9:50 am Convergence of Biologic and Surgical Reconstructive Therapies for Cardiovascular Diseases Y. Joseph Woo, MD Norman E. Shumway Professor Chair, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford 2 10:00 am Congenital Heart Disease: Pulmonary Artery Reconstruction Frank Hanley, MD Lawrence Crowley, MD, Endowed Professor in Child Health, Stanford 10:10 am Heart Failure and Heart Transplant
    [Show full text]
  • China-Taiwan Relations: the Shadow of SARS
    China-Taiwan Relations: The Shadow of SARS by David G. Brown Associate Director, Asian Studies The Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies Throughout this quarter, Beijing and Taipei struggled to contain the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). SARS dramatically reduced cross-Strait travel; its effects on cross-Strait economic ties appear less severe but remain to be fully assessed. SARS intensified the battle over Taiwan’s request for observer status at the World Health Organization (WHO). Although the World Health Assembly (WHA) again rejected Taiwan, the real problems of a global health emergency led to the first contacts between the WHO and Taiwan. Beijing’s handling of SARS embittered the atmosphere of cross- Strait relations and created a political issue in Taiwan that President Chen Shui-bian is moving to exploit in next year’s elections. SARS The SARS health emergency dominated cross-Strait developments during this quarter. With the dramatic removal of its health minister and the mayor of Beijing in mid-April, Beijing was forced to admit that it was confronting a health emergency with serious domestic and international implications. For about a month thereafter, Taiwan was proud of its success in controlling SARS. Then its first SARS death and SARS outbreaks in several hospitals led to first Taipei and then all Taiwan being added to the WHO travel advisory list. The PRC and Taiwan each in its own way mobilized resources and launched mass campaigns to control the spread of SARS. By late June, these efforts had achieved considerable success and the WHO travel advisories for both, as well as for Hong Kong, had been lifted.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Afternoon Keynote Address
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION CENTER FOR NORTHEAST ASIAN POLICY STUDIES and THE EPOCH FOUNDATION CROSS-STRAIT ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL RELATIONS AND THE NEXT AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION KEYNOTE ADDRESS H.E. VINCENT SIEW VICE PRESIDENT, REPUBLIC OF CHINA Wednesday, December 3, 2008 Far Eastern Plaza Hotel Taipei, Republic of China (Taiwan) Transcript prepared from an audio recording. ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 Welcome Remarks Paul S.P. Hsu President, Epoch Foundation and Chairman and CEO, PHYCOS International Co. Richard Bush Senior Fellow and Director, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies, Brookings Keynote Address: U.S. Foreign Policy in the New Administration Strobe Talbott President, The Brookings Institution Panel I: Asia Policy under the New U.S. Administration A view from the United States Michael Schiffer, Program Officer, Stanley Foundation A view from Hong Kong Frank Ching, Senior Columnist, South China Morning Post; CNAPS Advisory Council Member A view from Japan Tsuyoshi Sunohara, Senior Staff Diplomatic Writer, International News Department, Nikkei Newspaper A view from Korea Wonhyuk Lim, Director, Office for Development Cooperation, Korea Development Institute; CNAPS Visiting Fellow, 2005-2006 A view from Taiwan Erich Shih, News Anchor/Senior Producer, CTi Television, Inc.; Visiting Scholar, Peking University School of International Studies; CNAPS Visiting Fellow, 2003-2004 Afternoon Keynote Address Hon. Vincent Siew, Vice President of the Republic
    [Show full text]
  • 27 the China Factor in Taiwan
    Wu Jieh-min, 2016, “The China Factor in Taiwan: Impact and Response”, pp. 425-445 in Gunter Schubert ed., Handbook of T Modern Taiwan Politics and Society, Routledge. 27 THE CHINA FACTOR IN TAIWAN Impact and response Jieh-Min Wu* Since the turn of the century, the rise of China has inspired global a1nbitions and heightened international anxiety. Though Chinese influence is not a ne\V factor in the international geo­ political syste1n, the synergy between China's growing purchasing po\ver and its political \vill is dra\ving increasing attention on the world stage. With China's e111ergence as a global econontic powerhouse and the Chinese state's extraction of massive revenues and tremendous foreign reserves, Beijing has learned to flex these financial 1nuscles globally in order to achieve its polit­ ical goals. Essentially, the rise of China has enabled the PRC to speed up its n1ilitary moderniza­ tion and adroitly co1nbine econonllc measures and 'united front \Vork' in pursuit of its national interests. Hence Taiwan, whose sovereignty continues to be contested by the PRC, has been heavily i1npacted by China's new strategy. The Chinese ca1npaign kno\vn as 'using business to steer politics' has arguably been success­ ful in achieving inany of the effects desired by Beijing. For exan1ple, the Chinese government has repeatedly leveraged Taiwan's trade and econonllc dependence to intervene in Taiwan's elections. Such econonllc dependence n1ay constrain Taiwanese choices within a structure of Beijing's creation. In son1e historical 1no1nents, however, subjective identity and collect­ ive action could still en1erge as 'independent variables' that open up \Vindo\vs of opportun­ ity, expanding the range of available choices.
    [Show full text]
  • The PLA and the 16Th Party Congress Jiang Controls the Gun? James Mulvenon
    Hoover-CLM-5.qxd 6/5/2003 12:36 PM Page 20 The PLA and the 16th Party Congress Jiang Controls the Gun? James Mulvenon For Western observers of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the 16th Party Congress presented a curious mixture of the past, the present, and the future. Jiang Zemin’s long-rumored and ultimately successful bid to retain the chairmanship of the Central Military Commission (CMC) brought back memories of party-army relations in the late 1980s before Tiananmen. At the same time, the new crop of PLA leaders elevated to the CMC represents the present and future PLA, possessing high levels of experience, training, and education, and thus professionalism. This article explores the implications of Jiang’s gambit, analyzes the retirements of senior PLA leaders and the biographies of their replacements, and offers some pre- dictions about the choice of defense minister and the future course of Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-PLA relations. JIANG STICKS AROUND If imitation is the highest form of flattery, then Jiang Zemin has given Deng Xiaoping’s boots a real tongue-shine. Recall that at the 13th Party Congress in 1987, confident of his preeminence in the system, Deng retired from all formal positions save one, the chairmanship of the Central Military Commission. His logic at the time was clear.The PLA was still subordinate to party control, but the fresh memory of the breakdown of formal lines of authority during the events in Tiananmen Square told Deng that his continued personal control of the military was crucially important to Jiang Zemin’s successful transition to the leadership core.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2008 and the Future of Cross-Strait Relations
    Romberg, China Leadership Monitor, No. 21 Election 2008 and the Future of Cross-Strait Relations Alan D. Romberg With the nomination of Frank Hsieh Chang-ting as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate to oppose Kuomintang (KMT) candidate Ma Ying-jeou in Taiwan’s March 2008 presidential election, and with the PRC gearing up greater pressure on Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, this is an appropriate moment to think about how the election will affect cross-Strait relations. The policies adopted by the next Taipei administration will, of course, be decisive in determining the course of those relations over the next four or even eight years. However, the campaign itself will shape both the way the next administration approaches cross-Strait issues and the mindset of Mainland policymakers as they prepare to deal with the new Taiwan leadership. It will also condition U.S. attitudes toward the winner. Taiwan—Where the Candidates Stand on Cross-Strait Relations One of the striking things that emerges from conversations with senior leaders in the KMT and DPP is their common assertion that, for all of the barbed rhetoric and legislative battles that divide them, and for all of the attempts by the current Taipei administration to paint the KMT as a PRC collaborator, the mainstreams of their parties are not terribly far apart in crucial respects on cross-Strait issues. Both candidates advocate broader cross-Strait economic and cultural ties. Both seek to expand Taiwan’s “international space” in a capacity that does not subordinate it to the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHINESE ARMED FORCES in the 21St CENTURY Edited By
    THE CHINESE ARMED FORCES IN THE 21st CENTURY Edited by Larry M. Wortzel December 1999 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications and Production Office by calling commercial (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or via the Internet at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI's Homepage address is: http://carlisle-www.army. mil/usassi/welcome.htm ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-007-9 ii CONTENTS Introduction James R. Lilley..................... v 1. Geographic Ruminations Michael McDevitt ................... 1 2. The Chinese Military and the Peripheral States 1 in the 21st Century: A Security Tour d’Horizon Eric A.
    [Show full text]
  • HÀNWÉN and TAIWANESE SUBJECTIVITIES: a GENEALOGY of LANGUAGE POLICIES in TAIWAN, 1895-1945 by Hsuan-Yi Huang a DISSERTATION S
    HÀNWÉN AND TAIWANESE SUBJECTIVITIES: A GENEALOGY OF LANGUAGE POLICIES IN TAIWAN, 1895-1945 By Hsuan-Yi Huang A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Curriculum, Teaching, and Educational Policy—Doctor of Philosophy 2013 ABSTRACT HÀNWÉN AND TAIWANESE SUBJECTIVITIES: A GENEALOGY OF LANGUAGE POLICIES IN TAIWAN, 1895-1945 By Hsuan-Yi Huang This historical dissertation is a pedagogical project. In a critical and genealogical approach, inspired by Foucault’s genealogy and effective history and the new culture history of Sol Cohen and Hayden White, I hope pedagogically to raise awareness of the effect of history on shaping who we are and how we think about our self. I conceptualize such an historical approach as effective history as pedagogy, in which the purpose of history is to critically generate the pedagogical effects of history. This dissertation is a genealogical analysis of Taiwanese subjectivities under Japanese rule. Foucault’s theory of subjectivity, constituted by the four parts, substance of subjectivity, mode of subjectification, regimen of subjective practice, and telos of subjectification, served as a conceptual basis for my analysis of Taiwanese practices of the self-formation of a subject. Focusing on language policies in three historical events: the New Culture Movement in the 1920s, the Taiwanese Xiāngtǔ Literature Movement in the early 1930s, and the Japanization Movement during Wartime in 1937-1945, I analyzed discourses circulating within each event, particularly the possibilities/impossibilities created and shaped by discourses for Taiwanese subjectification practices. I illustrate discursive and subjectification practices that further shaped particular Taiwanese subjectivities in a particular event.
    [Show full text]
  • China High Level Dialogue
    U.S. – China High Level Dialogue March 29 – April 2, 2015 Beijing, China Major Power Relations & U.S. – China and the Middle East CAP-CUSEF High Level Dialogue TABLE OF CONTENTS Trip Background Information • Vitals and Trip Information • Itinerary (tentative) • Flight Information • Senior Official Meetings Biographies • PRC Structure • Chinese Participant Biographies (tentative) • U.S. Participant Biographies • Track II Dialogue Agenda Trip Documents – Major Power Relations: Key Issues for September 2015 White House Summit 1. Calendar of key U.S. – China Events 2. Memo on Regional Security in the Asia – Pacific, (Vikram Singh, Brian Harding, Rudy deLeon) 3. Memo on the New Silk Road, (Ariella Viehe) 4. Memo on Sustainable Development Goals (Molly Elgin-Cossart) 5. Memo on Development Banks (Molly Elgin-Cossart) 6. Memo on U.S. – China Forecast on Energy and Climate Issues, (Melanie Hart) 7. Memo on U.S. – China's Reform Program: Meetings and Background (Melanie Hart) 8. Memo on U.S. – China Climate Finance, (Pete Ogden) 9. Memo on Domestic U.S. Energy and Climate, (Greg Dotson) 10. Memo on U.S. and Iran Relations, (Hardin Lang, Peter Juul) 11. Memo on U.S. – China and the Middle East Cooperation, (Brian Katulis) 12. CAP Paper for discussion in Track II dialogue (draft) 13. SIIS paper for discussion in Track II dialogue (draft) 14. CAP-SIIS Recommendations on Track II Key Leadership Statements 1. Premier Li Keqiang, “Premier Li Keqiang Meets the Press – Third Session of the 12th NPC.” March 15, 2015 2. Foreign Minister Wang Yi, “Foreign Minister Wang Yi Meets the Press – Third Session of the 12th NPC.” March 8, 2015 3.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress
    U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Shirley A. Kan Specialist in Asian Security Affairs October 27, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32496 U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Summary This CRS Report, updated through the 113th Congress, discusses policy issues regarding military- to-military (mil-to-mil) contacts with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and records major contacts and crises since 1993. The United States suspended military contacts with China and imposed sanctions on arms sales in response to the Tiananmen Crackdown in 1989. In 1993, President Clinton reengaged with the top PRC leadership, including China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Renewed military exchanges with the PLA have not regained the closeness reached in the 1980s, when U.S.-PRC strategic alignment against the Soviet Union included U.S. arms sales to China. Improvements and deteriorations in overall bilateral engagement have affected military contacts, which were close in 1997-1998 and 2000, but marred by the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, mistaken NATO bombing of a PRC embassy in 1999, the EP-3 aircraft collision crisis in 2001, and the PLA’s aggressive maritime and air confrontations. Issues for Congress include whether the Administration complies with legislation overseeing dealings with the PLA and pursues contacts with the PLA that advance a prioritized set of U.S. security interests, especially the operational safety of U.S. military personnel. Oversight legislation includes the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for FY1990-FY1991 (P.L. 101-246) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2000 (P.L.
    [Show full text]