DOCSLIB.ORG

CB(1)2367/09-10(01) for Discussion on 2 July 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CB(1)2367/09-10(01) for Discussion on 2 July 2010 CB(1)2367/09-10(01) For discussion on 2 July 2010 Legislative Council Panel on Development Subcommittee on Harbourfront Planning Harbourfront Enhancement – Concluding Past Experience and Charting the Way Forward PURPOSE This paper presents Members with an overview of - (a) the Harbour-front Enhancement Committee (HEC)’s achievements and final recommendations on harbourfront management; (b) Harbour Unit of Development Bureau (DEVB)’s latest work on harbourfront enhancement; and (c) overseas experience in waterfront developments collated from visits made by the HEC and the Secretary for Development. HARBOUR-FRONT ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE’S ACHIEVEMENTS 2. The HEC concluded its six years of service on 28 February 2010. It was set up in May 2004 to advise the Government on planning, land uses and developments along the existing and new harbourfront of the Victoria Harbour. The Committee comprised broad-based representatives from various professional institutes, harbour planning and development concern groups, the business sector and independent personalities in a bid to foster balanced discussions and build consensus on issues pertaining to the harbourfront. 3. Ever since its establishment, the HEC had served as an effective platform for the Government, stakeholders and other members of the public to discuss matters related to enhancing and beautifying the harbourfront, and reducing the adverse impacts of public and private infrastructure projects on it. It successfully drew up the Harbour Planning Principles and Guidelines1, which 1 Please refer to http://www.harbourfront.org.hk/eng/content_page/doc/HEC_guidelines_e.pdf for details of the Harbour Planning Principles and Guidelines. provide guidance to both the Government and private developers in considering development and redevelopment proposals on the harbourfront. The HEC also made significant contributions to the formulation of land use recommendations for the Kai Tak Development and Wan Chai Development Phase II (WDII). More recently, its submissions to the Government on the Urban Design Study for the New Central Harbourfront (UDS), as well as harbourfront enhancement proposals on both sides of Victoria Harbour under 22 action areas2 were highlighted in the Chief Executive’s (CE) 2009-10 Policy Address. 4. In addition, the HEC initiated and oversaw the implementation of a number of quick-win harbourfront enhancement projects, in collaboration with the relevant District Councils, such as the West Kowloon Waterfront Promenade, the former Wan Chai Waterfront Promenade (commonly know as “Wan Chai Pet Garden”), the Kwun Tong Promenade Stage 1 at Kwun Tong Public Cargo Works Area, and the Sheung Wan Stormwater Pumping Station cum waterfront park at former Sheung Wan Gala Point. 5. The HEC also explored a framework for the sustainable management of the harbourfront in line with the Harbour Planning Principles and Guidelines. It set up a Task Group on Management Model for the Harbourfront (TGMMH) in December 2007 to devise a practicable proposal on institutional arrangement and management model for the Government’s consideration. The Task Group reviewed a wide variety of local and overseas examples through extensive research, discussions and local and overseas visits. Its work was crystallised into a recommendation report (Annex A), which was considered and endorsed by the HEC at its final meeting in February 2010. The report’s main recommendations are set out in paragraphs 7 to 20 below. 6. In wrapping up its work, the HEC produced a concluding publication (Annex B) which captures its major work and achievements over the past six years. The publication consists of articles written by both non-official and official Members, which recapitulate the work of the HEC and its sub-committees and working groups. The book has been published and will be distributed to former HEC Members as well as the wider community, including the Legislative Council, District Councils, relevant non-governmental organisations (NGOs), professional institutions, universities, secondary and primary schools as well as public libraries. HARBOUR-FRONT ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE’S FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON HARBOURFRONT MANAGEMENT 2 The 22 action areas and our harbourfront enhancement efforts therein are set out in Annex D. Please refer to paragraphs 21 to 27 of this paper for an overview. 2 I. Establishment of the Harbourfront Commission 7. The report of TGMMH carried two main recommendations. Firstly, it recommended the establishment of a non-statutory, advisory Harbourfront Commission to take its place with the following major roles and functions – (a) to play an advocacy, oversight and advisory role in the envisioning, planning, urban design, marketing and branding, development, management and operation of the harbourfront areas and facilities on a continuous and ongoing basis; (b) to exercise overall coordination and monitoring role for harbourfront planning, urban design, development and management to ensure effective integration of these major aspects; and (c) to foster and encourage the development, management and maintenance of the harbourfront through a wide range of contractual entrustment/partnership arrangements with the private sector (including the community, social enterprises and NGOs). 8. In the course of its deliberations, TGMMH recognised that a major challenge in our harbourfront enhancement work at present lied in the effective resolution of conflicts among various government objectives and mandates. Another challenge was the incompatible land uses of harbourfront sites inherited from the past, including some in private ownership. These two main considerations led to TGMMH’s recommendation to work on the basis of the existing institutional, policy and resource framework, under the championship of a non-executive Harbourfront Commission, backed up by high-level steer and resolve within the Government, to bring about holistic, integrated and responsive changes to the management of the harbourfront. The HEC was appointed by the Secretary for Development. To reflect the Administration’s priority attached to harbourfront work, TGMMH recommended that the new Harbourfront Commission appointments should be made by the Financial Secretary and the Secretary for Development should serve as Vice-Chairman to the Commission. 9. As with the HEC, TGMMH has recommended that the Commission should comprise non-official members as well as senior government officials and should continue HEC’s tradition of having both individual and organisation non-official members, which has been hailed as a 3 defining characteristic of the stakeholder-based approach of HEC. The organisation members are major stakeholder groups including professional institutes, harbour concern groups, green groups and business bodies. 10. As recommended in the TGMMH report, it is envisaged that the Commission may advocate, initiate and formulate initiatives, programmes and projects to enhance the planning, design, development, management and operation of harbourfront areas under the 22 action areas on both sides of the Victoria Harbour. These initiatives can be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis, with the support and input of the Government. 11. In addition, the Commission will be apprised, on a regular basis, of all Government initiated or coordinated harbourfront developments/projects (including infrastructure/utility projects). Government departments will invite non-government project proponents to consult the Harbourfront Commission on relevant projects and proposals. This process is essential to the Commission’s effective coordination and monitoring of harbourfront planning, design, development, management and operation. To ensure that the Commission’s views are adequately reflected, project proponents should seek the advice of the Commission at the early stages of the implementation of the projects. 12. TGMMH has advocated that the Commission should maintain a high degree of transparency in its work. The Commission’s meetings will be open to the public. The agendas, papers and records of meetings will also be made public, except in situations where matters of commercial sensitivity and confidentiality are involved. Secretariat support to the Commission will be provided by the Harbour Unit, a dedicated team that has been handling harbourfront-related planning and land issues in DEVB since its establishment in April 2009. 13. The Government took on board these recommendations and will shortly establish the Harbourfront Commission to succeed the HEC. II. Wider Application of Public-Private Partnership in Harbourfront Development and Management 14. The second recommendation in the TGMMH’s report was the wider application of public-private partnership (PPP) in Hong Kong in the context of harbourfront development and management. This recommendation was made in view of the successful examples of management in both Hong Kong and overseas. 4 15. To come up with a practicable proposal for Government’s consideration, TGMMH had gathered relevant information and researched into various management models. Some of the local management models of areas and facilities that it had studied include - (a) conventional Government design-build-operate models, such as West Kowloon Waterfront Promenade and Wan Chai Waterfront Promenade; (b) private sector involvement through donation, entrustment or other forms of PPP, such as Tsing Yi Waterfront Promenade, Avenue of Stars, Jockey Club Creative Arts Centre at Shek Kip Mei Factory Estate and Chi Lin Nunnery Nan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rainbow Foundation Limited Guidance Notes for Service Event Application
    Updated on 19 Jan, 2015 Rainbow Foundation Limited Guidance Notes for Service Event Application 1. Beneficiary Eligibility Criteria Applicant organization is eligible to apply if it is: a member of the Hong Kong Council of Social Service (HKCSS) a charitable institution being exempt from tax under Section 88 of Hong Kong’s Inland Revenue Ordinance a charitable institution or community centre serving following beneficiary types . Underprivileged children and youth (orphans, children from single parent/low income families or physically ill) . Individuals with disabilities (with valid "Registration Card for People with Disabilities") . Individuals with chronic illness . Individuals from rehabilitation center (former drug addicts/ former prisoners/ former mentally disabled) . Low income families . Low income and living alone elderly (aged 65 or above or with valid Senior Citizen Card) . Low income new arrivals . Ethnic minorities and refugees from South Asia Countries . Homeless The Preparatory Committee has the right to examine supporting documents of participants. 2. Application Procedure In 2015, Rainbow Foundation targets to serve 40,000 underprivileged. The Preparatory Committee will send an invitation letter with Guidance Notes for Service Event Application to selected organizations via email. Applicant organization should complete the Online Application Form together with a document of Hong Kong’s Inland Revenue Ordinance under Section 88 to us within the application period specified in the invitation letter. Website as below: https://application.rainbowfoundation.org.hk/service_event_apply_form.jsp Application received after the application period will not be considered. Application with missing or incorrect information will not be considered. Application will not be considered if the applicant fails to provide the supporting documents specified.
    [Show full text]
  • When Is the Best Time to Go to Hong Kong?
    Page 1 of 98 Chris’ Copyrights @ 2011 When Is The Best Time To Go To Hong Kong? Winter Season (December - March) is the most relaxing and comfortable time to go to Hong Kong but besides the weather, there's little else to do since the "Sale Season" occurs during Summer. There are some sales during Christmas & Chinese New Year but 90% of the clothes are for winter. Hong Kong can get very foggy during winter, as such, visit to the Peak is a hit-or-miss affair. A foggy bird's eye view of HK isn't really nice. Summer Season (May - October) is similar to Manila's weather, very hot but moving around in Hong Kong can get extra uncomfortable because of the high humidity which gives the "sticky" feeling. Hong Kong's rainy season also falls on their summer, July & August has the highest rainfall count and the typhoons also arrive in these months. The Sale / Shopping Festival is from the start of July to the start of September. If the sky is clear, the view from the Peak is great. Avoid going to Hong Kong when there are large-scale exhibitions or ongoing tournaments like the Hong Kong Sevens Rugby Tournament because hotel prices will be significantly higher. CUSTOMS & DUTY FREE ALLOWANCES & RESTRICTIONS • Currency - No restrictions • Tobacco - 19 cigarettes or 1 cigar or 25 grams of other manufactured tobacco • Liquor - 1 bottle of wine or spirits • Perfume - 60ml of perfume & 250 ml of eau de toilette • Cameras - No restrictions • Film - Reasonable for personal use • Gifts - Reasonable amount • Agricultural Items - Refer to consulate Note: • If arriving from Macau, duty-free imports for Macau residents are limited to half the above cigarette, cigar & tobacco allowance • Aircraft crew & passengers in direct transit via Hong Kong are limited to 20 cigarettes or 57 grams of pipe tobacco.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Impact Assessment Report of Fong Yuen Study Hall
    Heritage Impact Assessment for Revitalizing Historic Buildings through Partnership Scheme Conversion of Fong Yuen Study Hall into a Tourism & Chinese Cultural Centre cum Ma Wan Residents Museum Conversion of Fong Yuen Study Hall into a Tourism & Chinese Cultural Centre cum Ma Wan Residents Museum Social Services Department . The Yuen Yuen Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents.................................................................................................... 1 Conservation Management Plan ......................................................................... 1 0.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................1 1.0 Statement of Cultural Significance..................................................................................2 1.1 Description of the historic place .................................................................................2 1.2 Heritage Values ........................................................................................................2 1.3 Character defining elements ......................................................................................3 2.0 Opportunities and limitations .........................................................................................4 2.1 User’s requirement....................................................................................................4 2.2 Community and social context ...................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN PLANNING BOARD Minutes of 503 Meeting of the Rural and New
    TOWN PLANNING BOARD Minutes of 503rd Meeting of the Rural and New Town Planning Committee held at 2:45 p.m. on 17.1.2014 Present Director of Planning Chairman Mr K.K. Ling Mr Timothy K.W. Ma Vice-chairman Professor Edwin H.W. Chan Dr C.P. Lau Dr W.K. Yau Professor K.C. Chau Dr Wilton W.T. Fok Mr Ivan C.S. Fu Ms Janice W.M. Lai Ms Christina M. Lee Mr F.C. Chan - 2 - Chief Traffic Engineer/New Territories East, Transport Department Mr K.C. Siu Chief Engineer (Works), Home Affairs Department Mr Frankie W.P. Chou Principal Environmental Protection Officer (Strategic Assessment), Environmental Protection Department Mr H.M. Wong Assistant Director/New Territories, Lands Department Ms Anita K.F. Lam Deputy Director of Planning/District Secretary Miss Ophelia Y.S. Wong Absent with Apologies Mr Rock C.N. Chen Mr Lincoln L.H. Huang Mr H.F. Leung Ms Anita W.T. Ma In Attendance Assistant Director of Planning/Board Ms Brenda K.Y. Au Chief Town Planner/Town Planning Board Mr Louis K.H. Kau Assistant Town Planner/Town Planning Board Miss Floria Y.T. Tsang - 3 - Agenda Item 1 Confirmation of the Draft Minutes of the 502nd RNTPC Meeting held on 3.1.2014 [Open Meeting] 1. The draft minutes of the 502nd RNTPC meeting held on 3.1.2014 were confirmed without amendments. Agenda Item 2 Matters Arising [Open Meeting] 2. The Secretary reported that the Court of First Instance had granted the application for judicial review lodged by the Town Planning Board to quash the decision of the Town Planning Appeal Board for proposed golf course and residential development at Nam Sang Wai & Lut Chau, Yuen Long (Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • Report for Application of Wong Tai Sin Safe Community
    Report for Application of Wong Tai Sin Safe Community To become a Member of the International Safe Community Network for International Designation as a Safe Community by the WHO Collaborating Center on Community Safety Promotion Wong Tai Sin District Healthy and Safe City Hong Kong January 2011 1 Content 1. Introduction 1.1 History of Wong Tai Sin District (Page 3) 1.2 District Profile and Demographics Characteristics (Page 4-10) 1.3 Wong Tai Sin District Council and the District Hospitals 1.3.1 Wong Tai Sin District Council (WTSDC) (Page 11) 1.3.2 Buddhist Hospital (BH) (Page 12) 1.3.3 Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital (OLMH) (Page 13) 1.3.4 TWGHs Wong Tai Sin Hospital (TWGHs WTSH) (Page 14) 1.4 Background of the Designation of Wong Tai Sin Safe Community 1.4.1 The Strategic Directions (Page 15) 1.4.2 The Key Objectives (Page 15-16) 2. Safe Communities Indicators 2.1 Indicator 1: An infrastructure based on partnership and collaborations, governed by a cross-sectional group that is responsible for safety promotion in their community (Page 17-23) 2.2 Indicator 2: Long term, sustainable program covering both genders and all ages, environments and situations (Page 24-63) 2.3 Indicator 3: Programs that target high-risk groups and environments, and programs that promotes safety for vulnerable groups (Page 64-75) 2.4 Indicator 4: Programs that document the frequency and causes of injuries (Page 76-84) 2.5 Indicator 5: Evaluation measures to assess their programs, processes and effects of change (Page 85-88) 2.6 Indicator 6: Ongoing participations in national and international safe Communities networks (Page 89-94) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of 928 Meeting of the Town
    Minutes of 928 th Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 16.1.2009 Present Permanent Secretary for Development Chairman (Planning and Lands) Mr. Raymond Young Dr. Greg C.Y. Wong Vice-chairman Mr. Nelson W.Y. Chan Mr. Leslie H.C. Chen Professor David Dudgeon Mr. Tony C.N. Kan Dr. C.N. Ng Dr. Daniel B.M. To Mr. Stanley Y.F. Wong Ms. Sylvia S.F. Yau Mr. B.W. Chan Mr. Walter K.L. Chan Ms. Maggie M.K. Chan Mr. Raymond Y.M. Chan Mr. Y.K. Cheng - 2 - Mr. Felix W. Fong Ms. Anna S.Y. Kwong Dr. James C.W. Lau Mr. Rock C.N. Chen Mr. Timothy K.W. Ma Principal Assistant Secretary (Transport) Transport and Housing Bureau Mr. Tony Lam Deputy Director Environmental Protection Department Mr. Benny Wong Assistant Director (2), Home Affairs Department Mr. Andrew Tsang Director of Lands Miss Annie Tam Director of Planning Mrs. Ava S.Y. Ng Deputy Director of Planning/District Secretary Miss Ophelia Y.S. Wong Absent with Apologies Mr. David W.M. Chan Professor N.K. Leung Mr. Edmund K.H. Leung Professor Bernard V.W.F. Lim Mr. Alfred Donald Yap Professor Paul K.S. Lam Ms. Starry W.K. Lee Mr. K.Y. Leung Professor Edwin H.W. Chan - 3 - Dr. Ellen Y.Y. Lau Mr. Maurice W.M. Lee Dr. Winnie S.M. Tang In Attendance Assistant Director of Planning/Board (Atg.) Ms. Christine K.C. Tse Chief Town Planner/Town Planning Board (Atg.) Mr. Ivan M.K. Chung Senior Town Planner/Town Planning Board Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Bsc (Honours) Tourism Management
    Sheffield Business School BSc (Honours) Tourism Management Title: A study of visitors’ perception of Ma Wan Park’s Noah Ark Name: Cheung Ka Po Student No 91204617 Month Year April 2010 I Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield Business School Title: A study of visitors’ perception of Ma Wan Park’s Noah Ark FULL NAME: Cheung Ka Po STUDENT No : 91204617 Supervisor: Dr. Vincent Heung In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Tourism Management. Month Year April 2010 II Acknowledgment I would like to thank all of teachers, classmates, friends and Noah Ark’s staffs who have helped and supported me to finish the dissertation. First of all, I am really grateful to Dr. Vincent Heung for all that he had done. He gives me many professional guidance to my study. I am deeply appreciative of his help. Also, I would like to thank my high diploma teacher Mrs. Lam who gives me some valuable comments to my dissertation at the starting point. III Abstract The dissertation presents a study on visitors’ perception of Ma Wan Park’s Noah Ark. The objective of the dissertation is to identify the visitor’s expectation of Ma Wan Park and raise visitor’s awareness on the environment protection issue. It will forces on the push and pull factor and the satisfaction level from the visitors. Also, it will find out the target market and expectation of the visitors to sustain the park operation. The major use of literature is about perception, satisfaction and destination image to help the direction of this current research.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Application of Student Accommodations
    THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG STUDENT AFFAIRS OFFICE Point System for Hall Admission 2020/21 The review on Hall Point System for hall admission with inputs from stakeholders including current residents, student bodies, Wardens, Senior Tutors, Student Hall Tutors, Student Residents’ Associations and all student is held annually. A series of consultation sessions, focus group discussions and online consultation were conducted from October 2019 to January 2020 to collect views from various stakeholders on the Hall Point System. Based on stakeholders’ views collected, the hall point ratio and maximum points capped in various sections would remain unchanged for implementation in the Hall Admission for 2020/21. The Point System for Hall Admission for 2020/21 as approved by the Student Affairs Committee in March 2020 is as follows. Maximum Hall Point Section Allocation Criteria Hall Points Distribution A Daily Commuting Time based on Home Location 53 50% B Types of Living Quarters 7 (60) C Participation in Student Activities & Hall Activities 15 Current University Representation & Leadership Role in D 30 Student Organization 50% (60) E No Prior Hall Experience 10 F Students’ Achievements 5 Please read carefully before proceeding to the next step of application. *** GUIDING PRINCIPLES *** 1. The Point System applies to all eligible full-time students. 2. In Section C, only those activities organized by student organizations and/or departments/ centres/ offices of the University from 1 May 2019 to 30 April 2020 are considered. 3. In Section D, points will only be given to posts being taken up at the time of application so as to facilitate students’ active campus involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of 911 Meeting of the Town
    Minutes of 911st Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 16.5.2008 Present Permanent Secretary for Development (Planning and Lands) Chairman Mr. Raymond Young Dr. Greg C.Y. Wong Vice-Chairman Mr. Nelson W.Y. Chan Mr. David W.M. Chan Mr. Leslie H.C. Chen Professor David Dudgeon Mr. Tony C.N. Kan Mr. Edmund K.H. Leung Professor N.K. Leung Dr. C.N. Ng Dr. Daniel B.M. To Mr. Stanley Y.F. Wong Mr. Alfred Donald Yap Ms. Sylvia S.F. Yau Mr. B.W. Chan Mr. Walter K.L. Chan - 2 - Mr. Raymond Y.M. Chan Mr. Y.K. Cheng Mr. Felix W. Fong Ms. Anna S.Y. Kwong Mr. K.Y. Leung Mr. Rock C.N. Chen Dr. Winnie S.M. Tang Deputy Director of Environmental Protection Dr. Michael Chiu Director of Lands Miss Annie Tam Director of Planning Mrs. Ava S.Y. Ng Deputy Director of Planning/District Secretary Miss Ophelia Y.S. Wong Absent with Apologies Professor Bernard V.W.F. Lim Ms. Maggie M.K. Chan Professor Paul K.S. Lam Dr. James C.W. Lau Ms. Starry W.K. Lee Mr. Maurice W.M Lee Mr. Timothy K.W. Ma Professor Edwin H.K. Chan Dr. Ellen Y.Y. Lau Principal Assistant Secretary (Transport), Transport and Housing Bureau - 3 - Ms. Ava Chiu Assistant Director (2), Home Affairs Department Ms. Margaret Hsia In Attendance Assistant Director of Planning/Board Mr. Lau Sing Chief Town Planner/Town Planning Board Mr. C. T. Ling (a.m.) Ms. Christine Tse (p.m.) Senior Town Planner/Town Planning Board Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Noah's Academy Program
    Noah’s Academy SuperCamp 2018 ® SuperCamp 2018 Enrollment Form Eligibility Only students born between July 2003 and August 2008, aged 10 - 14 at the time of the camp may apply for this camp. Enrollment Enrollment is on a first come, first served basis. Register early to ensure a space! Complete the Enrollment Form. Please use one enrollment form per child. A confirmation e-mail or letter will be sent upon receipt of the enrollment form and payment confirmation. Terms of Payment 50% of the tuition (HK$8,500) is due as deposit with the Enrollment Form. The balance of tuition less any discounts is due by July 16, 2018. Payment Method： Apply through online enrollment form: Settle of deposit by VISA/MASTERCARD. Settle of balance of tuition less any discounts by cheque or ATM transfer to designated account at The Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank Corporation. Apply using this enrollment form: The deposit and the balance of tuition less any discounts are to be settled by cheque or ATM transfer to designated account at The Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank Corporation. Cancellation Policy Cancellations must be in writing. An administration fee will be deducted from the tuition amount paid. There is no refund on or after June 1, 2018 Cancellation notice received Administration fee Prior to May 31, 2018 HK$3,000 *Mandatory Student Information Noah’s Academy Membership Number: (If you are not yet a member, you will be automatically registered as a member upon the submission of this application form) Student Name Chinese Full Name: English Full Name*: Name student likes to be called: Gender*: Male Female Birth date (mm/yy)*: Age at camp: Name of School: Grade Level in Sept 2018: Has he/ she attended SuperCamp before?: Yes (which year?): No T-shirt size (adult size)*: XS S M L XL Noah’s Academy SuperCamp 2018 Language Skills Language used at home: #1st 2nd # If English is not your child’s first language, please tick proficiency level: Level 1: Students can comprehend simple statements and questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Malia Hirshmann and Family Emilie Lawrence and Family How to Use This Book
    fullest. The biggest obstacles between you and a great outing Foreword I hope will be eliminated by this book – namely how to identify and then locate a fun-filled outing – because while things in Hong Kong has changed so much since my husband and I Hong Kong for families have improved greatly, directions can arrived here as a newly married couple in 1996. When we had still be difficult and daunting. our first child in 1998, I struggled at first to find fun and exciting adventures that we could do as a family. It was not so much The venues selected for inclusion in this book are those our that these opportunities did not exist, but more that I did not family found worthy of a visit. Every site has been “Stephens know about them and had no idea how to get the information I Family tested” in the hopes of eliminating the possibility needed or the directions. When child number two was born in of hauling your children around Hong Kong only to be 2000, it became a passion of mine to explore this amazing city disappointed once you arrive (we have done this and it’s no with my family. After compiling the notes on those adventures, fun!) This book is not about rating venues or ranking activities the first edition of Hong Kong for Kids: A Parent’s Guide (2004) in Hong Kong – it is about identifying the best things that are was born. currently here to be explored. Little girl number three came along in 2005 and with her a When I first arrived in Hong Kong, I was fortunate enough to whole new set of challenges and two slightly older children who meet some lovely ladies who took it upon themselves to show wanted to explore more stuff! Now we have a nine-year-old and me around.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes of Meeting
    16th BLG (Theme Parks) Meeting Notes of the 16th Meeting of Business Liaison Group (Theme Parks) Date & time : 9:30 am on 17 December 2013 (Tuesday) Venue : Conference Room 3, G/F., Central Government Offices, Tamar Chairman : Mr CHAN Wah Chan, Head, Business Facilitation Division, Economic Analysis and Business Facilitation Unit Trade attendees: Hong Kong International Theme Parks Limited Ms Mabel FUNG Building Surveyor Mr John KWONG Integrated Facility Planning Manager Ocean Park Corporation Mr Joseph LEUNG Executive Director – Revenue Mr Arthur WONG Project Development Director Mr Kenneth LAU Operations Director Ms Gillian CHO Assistant Corporate Services Manager – Administration Observers: Future Leisure Aviation Limited Ms Katty IU Marketing Manager Hong Kong Sky Deck Limited Mr Anthony CHAN Senior Operation Officer Ngong Ping 360 Limited Mr William CHEUNG Head, Services Operations Mr Alan CHOW Electrical Engineer Ms Kathy TONG Assistant Manager, Safety & Quality Madame Tussauds Ms Kelly MAK General Manager Government representatives: Buildings Department (BD) Mr Prince WONG Building Surveyor Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) Mr Eric CHEUNG Superintendent Transport Department (TD) Miss Janice LAI Senior Transport Officer P.1 16th BLG (Theme Parks) Meeting Economic Analysis and Business Facilitation Unit (EABFU) Ms Christie LAM Chief Management Services Officer (Secretary) Mr Robert CHU Management Services Officer Action 1. The Chairman welcomed all to the meeting. Agenda 1 – Confirmation of notes of the last meeting 2. The notes of the last meeting posted at the Business Facilitation Initiatives website (http://www.gov.hk/en/theme/bf/pdf/TP_BLG_15_Notes.pdf) were confirmed without amendment. Agenda 2 – Briefings by Departments Waiving referees' signature requirement of liquor licence applications 3.
    [Show full text]