On the Composition and Function of the Gut Microbiome of Two Insect Species, the Generalist Spodoptera Littoralis and the Specialist Melolontha Hippocastani

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Composition and Function of the Gut Microbiome of Two Insect Species, the Generalist Spodoptera Littoralis and the Specialist Melolontha Hippocastani On the composition and function of the gut microbiome of two insect species, the generalist Spodoptera littoralis and the specialist Melolontha hippocastani Dissertation to Fulfill the Requirements for the Degree of “doctor rerum naturalium” (Dr.rer.nat) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Biology and Pharmacy of the Friedrich Schiller University By M.Sc. Pol Alonso Pernas, born on 12.12.1986 in Barcelona Dissertation, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, [2018] Reviewers: 1. Prof. Wilhelm Boland (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena) 2. Prof. Erika Kothe (Institute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena) 3. Prof. Dieter Spiteller (University of Konstanz, Konstanz) Date of the public defense: July 4th 2018 Table of contents Abbreviations and symbols 1. General introduction ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1. General structure and physiochemical conditions of insect guts ............................... 7 1.2. Types of symbionts and mechanisms of transmission .............................................. 10 1.3. Correlation between location and role of insect symbiotic bacteria ......................... 12 1.4. Melolontha hippocastani: life cycle, gut physiochemical conditions and known bacterial symbionts .......................................................................................................... 18 1.5. Spodoptera littoralis: life cycle, gut physiochemical conditions and known bacterial symbionts ......................................................................................................................... 20 1.6. Goals of the thesis ..................................................................................................... 21 2. Thesis outline: list of articles with author’s contribution .................................................. 23 3. Articles with author’s contribution ...................................................................................... 27 3.1. Article I ..................................................................................................................... 27 3.2. Article II ................................................................................................................... 48 3.3.Article III ................................................................................................................... 54 4. Unpublished results ............................................................................................................... 73 5. General discussion ............................................................................................................... 103 5.1. Summary of the findings ........................................................................................ 103 5.2. Function of the gut bacterial symbionts of a coleopteran (M. hippocastani).......... 104 5.3. Function of Enterococcus mundtii within the gut of a lepidopteran (S. littoralis) . 106 5.4. Dynamics of the bacterial community inhabiting the hindgut wall of larval Melolontha hippocastani ............................................................................................... 108 5.5. Bacterial community and possible biological role of the pockets .......................... 111 5.6. Comparison of the symbiotic communities of Spodoptera littoralis and Melolontha hippocastani .................................................................................................................. 113 6. Future perspectives .............................................................................................................. 116 7. Summary ............................................................................................................................... 118 7.1. English .................................................................................................................... 118 7.2. German .................................................................................................................... 120 8. References ............................................................................................................................. 124 9. Eigenständigkeiterklärung .................................................................................................. 136 10. Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................. 137 Abbreviations and symbols AMP antimicrobial peptide APSE Acyrthosiphon pisum secondary endosymbiont BLAST Basic Local Alignment Search Tool cDNA complementary DNA CoA coenzyme A CPM counts per million dd-H2O double-distilled water DE differentially expressed DEPC diethyl pyrocarbonate DUOX dual oxidase FACS fluorescence-activated cell sorting FDR false discovery rate FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization GC-MS gas chromatography – mass spectrometry GFP green fluorescent protein HDE highly and differentially expressed IRMS isotope ratio mass spectrometry KEGG Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes NCBI National Center for Biotechnology Information NSTI nearest sequenced taxon index OTU operational taxonomic unit PBS phosphate-buffered saline PHB polyhydroxybutyrate PICRUSt Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States PP pyrophosphate qPCR quantitative polymerase chain reaction rDNA ribosomal DNA RNAseq RNA sequencing ROS reactive oxygen species RPKM reads per kilobase per million mapped reads rRNA ribosomal RNA SIP stable isotope probing TCA tricarboxylic acid TEM transmission electron microscopy TMM trimmed mean of M-values 1. General introduction_________________________________________________________7 1. General introduction Insects are the largest class of animals on Earth. Of all the plants and animal species described till date, insects occupy approximately 60% of it. [1]. They can be found in water, on land, in almost any latitude, even southern of the Antarctic circle [2]. Such an extreme widespread distribution implies that insects must embrace a variety of habitats and life styles, which would not be possible without a corresponding physiological adaptation. Concretely, the gut is of particular interest, as this organ is responsible for the processing of the food as well as for excretion of digestive waste. The vast range of diets consumed by the class Insecta is reflected in the diversification of gut structures among different insect species [3]. Also, the digestive tract harbors symbiotic microorganisms, without which insects possibly would not have achieved their ecological success. These partners (microbiome) belong to a wide range of taxonomic affiliations spanning through several domains, encompassing fungi, bacteria, viruses and protozoa [4], [5], [6], [7]. Diet and host taxon are the two most significant factors that influence the composition of the symbiotic community [8], [9]. 1.1 General structure and physiochemical conditions of insect guts The insect gut is a continuous tube divided into three main sections: the foregut, the midgut, and the hindgut (Fig. 1A). The most proximal one, the foregut, is of ectodermal origin. Thus, its cells secrete a chitinous cuticle, known as intima, which is continuous with that covering the outside of the body [10]. The foregut is not involved either in secretion of digestive enzymes or absorption of nutrients. Its main functions are pushing the ingested material towards the midgut and its storage, principally in a subsection called crop [3]. The following section, the midgut, is of endodermal origin and its cells do not secrete cuticle but a more fragile membrane named the peritrophic matrix. Since it is in this region of the digestive tract where most digestive processes take place, the midgut cells actively secrete digestive enzymes into the lumen. Also, the epithelium is covered with microvilli which optimize absorption by increasing the area of contact of the cells with the ingested material up to two orders of magnitude [10]. Usually, the microvilli are covered by a layer of filamentous glycoproteins called glycocalyx, lining the so called ectoperitrophic space, delimited by the other side by the above mentioned peritrophic matrix. In some cases, this membrane packages the food bolus as it moves thought the digestive tract. Either way, the peritrophic matrix is composed of a number of laminae made of a network of 8_________________________________________________________1. General introduction chitin, proteins and glycoproteins. Its main purpose is the separation of the food material from the midgut epithelium, thus protecting the microvilli from abrasion and rendering possible the compartmentalization of enzymatic activity in the endo- and ectoperitrophic spaces [10]. To some extent, the peritrophic matrix also provides protection against harmful chemicals and pathogenic microorganisms, as the pores formed by the proteoglycans (less than 100 nm in diameter) are too small to permit the passage of bacteria [3], [10]. Thus, insects harboring symbiotic bacteria in the midgut confine them to the endoperitrophic space. After the midgut lies the pylorus, sometimes forming a valve between the midgut and the hindgut. Arising from it, the Malpighian tubules collect wastes of different nature from the hemolymph, such as uric acid or alkaloids, and release them to the anterior hindgut [10]. Figure 1. The insect gut. (A) Representation of the general design of the insect gut. (B) Representation of
Recommended publications
  • Ecomorph Convergence in Stick Insects (Phasmatodea) with Emphasis on the Lonchodinae of Papua New Guinea
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2018-07-01 Ecomorph Convergence in Stick Insects (Phasmatodea) with Emphasis on the Lonchodinae of Papua New Guinea Yelena Marlese Pacheco Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Life Sciences Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Pacheco, Yelena Marlese, "Ecomorph Convergence in Stick Insects (Phasmatodea) with Emphasis on the Lonchodinae of Papua New Guinea" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 7444. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Ecomorph Convergence in Stick Insects (Phasmatodea) with Emphasis on the Lonchodinae of Papua New Guinea Yelena Marlese Pacheco A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Michael F. Whiting, Chair Sven Bradler Seth M. Bybee Steven D. Leavitt Department of Biology Brigham Young University Copyright © 2018 Yelena Marlese Pacheco All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Ecomorph Convergence in Stick Insects (Phasmatodea) with Emphasis on the Lonchodinae of Papua New Guinea Yelena Marlese Pacheco Department of Biology, BYU Master of Science Phasmatodea exhibit a variety of cryptic ecomorphs associated with various microhabitats. Multiple ecomorphs are present in the stick insect fauna from Papua New Guinea, including the tree lobster, spiny, and long slender forms. While ecomorphs have long been recognized in phasmids, there has yet to be an attempt to objectively define and study the evolution of these ecomorphs.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pentatomidae) DISSERTATION Presented
    Genome Evolution During Development of Symbiosis in Extracellular Mutualists of Stink Bugs (Pentatomidae) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alejandro Otero-Bravo Graduate Program in Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University 2020 Dissertation Committee: Zakee L. Sabree, Advisor Rachelle Adams Norman Johnson Laura Kubatko Copyrighted by Alejandro Otero-Bravo 2020 Abstract Nutritional symbioses between bacteria and insects are prevalent, diverse, and have allowed insects to expand their feeding strategies and niches. It has been well characterized that long-term insect-bacterial mutualisms cause genome reduction resulting in extremely small genomes, some even approaching sizes more similar to organelles than bacteria. While several symbioses have been described, each provides a limited view of a single or few stages of the process of reduction and the minority of these are of extracellular symbionts. This dissertation aims to address the knowledge gap in the genome evolution of extracellular insect symbionts using the stink bug – Pantoea system. Specifically, how do these symbionts genomes evolve and differ from their free- living or intracellular counterparts? In the introduction, we review the literature on extracellular symbionts of stink bugs and explore the characteristics of this system that make it valuable for the study of symbiosis. We find that stink bug symbiont genomes are very valuable for the study of genome evolution due not only to their biphasic lifestyle, but also to the degree of coevolution with their hosts. i In Chapter 1 we investigate one of the traits associated with genome reduction, high mutation rates, for Candidatus ‘Pantoea carbekii’ the symbiont of the economically important pest insect Halyomorpha halys, the brown marmorated stink bug, and evaluate its potential for elucidating host distribution, an analysis which has been successfully used with other intracellular symbionts.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Report Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61 (4): 863–868, 2016
    Brief report Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61 (4): 863–868, 2016 A new pentatomoid bug from the Ypresian of Patagonia, Argentina JULIÁN F. PETRULEVIČIUS A new pentatomoid heteropteran, Chinchekoala qunita gen. (Wilf et al. 2003). It consists of a single specimen, holotype et sp. nov. is described from the lower Eocene of Laguna MPEF-PI 944a–b, with dorsal and ventral sides, collected from del Hunco, Patagonia, Argentina. The new genus is mainly pyroclastic debris of the plant locality LH-25, latitude 42°30’S, characterised by cephalic characters such as the mandibular longitude 70°W (Wilf 2012; Wilf et al. 2003, 2005). The locality plates surpassing the clypeus and touching each other in dor- was dated using 40Ar/39Ar by Wilf et al. (2005) and recalculated sal view; head wider than long; and remarkable characters by Wilf (2012), giving an age of 52.22 ± 0.22 (analytical 2 σ), related to the eyes, which are surrounded antero-laterally ± 0.29 (full 2 σ) Ma. The specimen was originally partly covered and posteriorly by the anteocular processes and the prono- by sediment and was prepared with a pneumatic hammer. It was tum, as well as they extend medially more than usual in the drawn with a camera lucida attached to a Wild M8 stereomicro- Pentatomoidea. This is the first pentatomoid from the Ypre- scope and photographed with a Nikon SMZ800 with a DS-Vi1 sian of Patagonia and the second from the Eocene in the re- camera. For female genitalia nomenclature I use valvifers VIII gion, being the unique two fossil pentatomoids in Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Field Biology of the Sorghum Chafer, Pachnoda Interrupta (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Ethiopia
    Vol. 5(5), pp. 64-69, August 2013 DOI: 10.5897/JEN2012.0059 ISSN 2006-9855 ©2013 Academic Journals Journal of Entomology and Nematology http://www.academicjournals.org/JEN Full Length Research Paper Ecology and field biology of the sorghum chafer, Pachnoda interrupta (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Ethiopia Asmare Dejen1* and Yeshitila Merene2 1Wollo University, College of Agriculture, P.O.Box 1145, Dessie, Ethiopia. 2Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute, P.O.Box 08 Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Accepted 4 June 2013 Studies on sorghum chafer (Pachnoda interrupta) were conducted under field conditions for two consecutive years (2005 to 2006) to determine the biology and ecology of the beetle. On average, oviposition rate by a single female was 1.28 eggs per day over a period of 11 days. In general, eggs hatched within 4 to 22 days with a mean of 15.7 days, after which larval and pupal stages lasted a mean of 59.8 and 18.3 days, respectively. The highest rate of oviposition was recorded during the first four days after mating and none after the eleventh day. A total of 156 and 236 sites or samples were investigated from nine habitats (under trees in a forest, under trees in a crop field, in crop fields, border of crop field, grazing land, riverside, manure heaps, termite mound and cattle dung in homesteads) to identify breeding and hibernating areas of the beetles. Fertile humus and moist light soil under the shade of various tree species in the forest and along the riverside were found to be the potential breeding and hibernating areas of the beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information for Microbial Electrochemical Systems Outperform Fixed-Bed Biofilters for Cleaning-Up Urban Wastewater
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 Supplementary information for Microbial Electrochemical Systems outperform fixed-bed biofilters for cleaning-up urban wastewater AUTHORS: Arantxa Aguirre-Sierraa, Tristano Bacchetti De Gregorisb, Antonio Berná, Juan José Salasc, Carlos Aragónc, Abraham Esteve-Núñezab* Fig.1S Total nitrogen (A), ammonia (B) and nitrate (C) influent and effluent average values of the coke and the gravel biofilters. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. Fig. 2S Influent and effluent COD (A) and BOD5 (B) average values of the hybrid biofilter and the hybrid polarized biofilter. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. Fig. 3S Redox potential measured in the coke and the gravel biofilters Fig. 4S Rarefaction curves calculated for each sample based on the OTU computations. Fig. 5S Correspondence analysis biplot of classes’ distribution from pyrosequencing analysis. Fig. 6S. Relative abundance of classes of the category ‘other’ at class level. Table 1S Influent pre-treated wastewater and effluents characteristics. Averages ± SD HRT (d) 4.0 3.4 1.7 0.8 0.5 Influent COD (mg L-1) 246 ± 114 330 ± 107 457 ± 92 318 ± 143 393 ± 101 -1 BOD5 (mg L ) 136 ± 86 235 ± 36 268 ± 81 176 ± 127 213 ± 112 TN (mg L-1) 45.0 ± 17.4 60.6 ± 7.5 57.7 ± 3.9 43.7 ± 16.5 54.8 ± 10.1 -1 NH4-N (mg L ) 32.7 ± 18.7 51.6 ± 6.5 49.0 ± 2.3 36.6 ± 15.9 47.0 ± 8.8 -1 NO3-N (mg L ) 2.3 ± 3.6 1.0 ± 1.6 0.8 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 2.0 0.9 ± 0.6 TP (mg
    [Show full text]
  • Work History Teacher's Assistant, Animal Behavior, Brown University
    BILLY A. KRIMMEL Academic Training Sc.B. Brown University, 2008 (Human Biology); Honors in Biology Current Position Ph.D. Candidate in Ecology at UC Davis (Jay Rosenheim’s laboratory), 2009-; dissertation title: Plant traits and plant-herbivore-omnivore interactions Work History Teacher’s Assistant, Animal Behavior, Brown University, 2006, 2007 Teacher’s Assistant, Behavioral Ecology, Brown University, 2008 Instructor, All Kids Are Scientists (AKA Science), Portland OR, 2008-2009 Teacher’s Assistant, Introduction to Ecology and Evolution, UC Davis, 2010, 2011 Guest Instructor, Freshman Entomology Seminar, UC Davis, 2011 Guest Lecturer, California Wildflowers, American River College, 2014 Honors and Awards Royce Society Fellow, Brown University, 2006-2008 Senior Prize in Biology, Brown University, 2008 NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (GRF), 2011- 2014 Jastro Shields Fellowship, UC Davis, 2011 Robert van den Bosch Scholarship, University of California, 2012, 2013, 2014 UC Directors' Scholarship, UC Davis, 2013, 2014 Mildred Mathias Scholarship, University of California, 2013 Finalist, Lots of Opportunity Competition, Louisville, KY, 2014 UC Davis Business Development Fellow, 2014-2015 Publications Krimmel BA & Wheeler AG (in review) Hostplant stickiness disrupts novel ant-mealybug association. Arthropod-Plant Interactions Wheeler AG & Krimmel BA (in press) Mirid (Heteroptera) specialists of sticky plants: Adaptations, Interactions, and Ecological Implications. Annual Review of Entomology. Publication date: January 2015 Krimmel BA & Pearse IS (2014) Generalist and sticky plant specialist predators effectively suppress herbivores on a sticky plant. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 8: 403-410 Krimmel BA (2014) Why plant trichomes might be better than we think for predatory insects. Pest Management Science 70(11): 1666-1667 Wheeler AG & Krimmel BA (2014) Kleidocerys obovatus Van Duzee (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae: Ischnorhynchinae): New Distribution Records and Habits of an Apparent Seed Specialist on Cypress, Hesperocyparis spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy JN869023
    Species that differentiate periods of high vs. low species richness in unattached communities Species Taxonomy JN869023 Bacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales; ACK-M1 JN674641 Bacteria; Bacteroidetes; [Saprospirae]; [Saprospirales]; Chitinophagaceae; Sediminibacterium JN869030 Bacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales; ACK-M1 U51104 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Comamonadaceae; Limnohabitans JN868812 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Comamonadaceae JN391888 Bacteria; Planctomycetes; Planctomycetia; Planctomycetales; Planctomycetaceae; Planctomyces HM856408 Bacteria; Planctomycetes; Phycisphaerae; Phycisphaerales GQ347385 Bacteria; Verrucomicrobia; [Methylacidiphilae]; Methylacidiphilales; LD19 GU305856 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Alphaproteobacteria; Rickettsiales; Pelagibacteraceae GQ340302 Bacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales JN869125 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Comamonadaceae New.ReferenceOTU470 Bacteria; Cyanobacteria; ML635J-21 JN679119 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Comamonadaceae HM141858 Bacteria; Acidobacteria; Holophagae; Holophagales; Holophagaceae; Geothrix FQ659340 Bacteria; Verrucomicrobia; [Pedosphaerae]; [Pedosphaerales]; auto67_4W AY133074 Bacteria; Elusimicrobia; Elusimicrobia; Elusimicrobiales FJ800541 Bacteria; Verrucomicrobia; [Pedosphaerae]; [Pedosphaerales]; R4-41B JQ346769 Bacteria; Acidobacteria; [Chloracidobacteria]; RB41; Ellin6075
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents I
    Comparison of the gut microbiome of a generalist insect, Spodoptera littoralis and a specialist, leaf and root feeder one, Melolontha hippocastani Dissertation To Fulfill the Requirements for the Degree of „doctor rerum naturalium“ (Dr. rer. nat.) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty Of Biology and Pharmacy of the Friedrich Schiller University By Master of Science of Horticulture Erika Arias Cordero Born on 01.11.1977 in San José, Costa Rica Gutachter: 1. ___________________________ 2. ___________________________ 3. ___________________________ Tag der öffentlichen verteidigung:……………………………………. Table of Contents i Table of Contents 1. General Introduction 1 1.1 Insect-bacteria associations ......................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Intracellular endosymbiotic associations ........................................................... 2 1.1.2 Exoskeleton-ectosymbiotic associations ........................................................... 4 1.1.3 Gut lining ectosymbiotic symbiosis ................................................................... 4 1.2 Description of the insect species ................................................................................ 12 1.2.1 Biology of Spodoptera littoralis ............................................................................ 12 1.2.2 Biology of Melolontha hippocastani, the forest cockchafer ................................... 14 1.3 Goals of this study ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rapid Radiations of Insects: Challenges for Phylogenetic Analysis
    ANRV330-EN53-23 ARI 2 November 2007 18:40 Ancient Rapid Radiations of Insects: Challenges for Phylogenetic Analysis James B. Whitfield1 and Karl M. Kjer2 1Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61821; email: jwhitfi[email protected] 2Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008. 53:449–72 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on diversification, molecular evolution, Palaeoptera, Orthopteroidea, September 17, 2007 fossils The Annual Review of Entomology is online at ento.annualreviews.org Abstract by UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS on 12/18/07. For personal use only. This article’s doi: Phylogenies of major groups of insects based on both morphological 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093304 and molecular data have sometimes been contentious, often lacking Copyright c 2008 by Annual Reviews. the data to distinguish between alternative views of relationships. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008.53:449-472. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org All rights reserved This paucity of data is often due to real biological and historical 0066-4170/08/0107-0449$20.00 causes, such as shortness of time spans between divergences for evo- lution to occur and long time spans after divergences for subsequent evolutionary changes to obscure the earlier ones. Another reason for difficulty in resolving some of the relationships using molecu- lar data is the limited spectrum of genes so far developed for phy- logeny estimation. For this latter issue, there is cause for current optimism owing to rapid increases in our knowledge of comparative genomics.
    [Show full text]
  • Methane Production in Terrestrial Arthropods (Methanogens/Symbiouis/Anaerobic Protsts/Evolution/Atmospheric Methane) JOHANNES H
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 5441-5445, June 1994 Microbiology Methane production in terrestrial arthropods (methanogens/symbiouis/anaerobic protsts/evolution/atmospheric methane) JOHANNES H. P. HACKSTEIN AND CLAUDIUS K. STUMM Department of Microbiology and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Science, Catholic University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld, NL-6525 ED Nimegen, The Netherlands Communicated by Lynn Margulis, February 1, 1994 (receivedfor review June 22, 1993) ABSTRACT We have screened more than 110 represen- stoppers. For 2-12 hr the arthropods (0.5-50 g fresh weight, tatives of the different taxa of terrsrial arthropods for depending on size and availability of specimens) were incu- methane production in order to obtain additional information bated at room temperature (210C). The detection limit for about the origins of biogenic methane. Methanogenic bacteria methane was in the nmol range, guaranteeing that any occur in the hindguts of nearly all tropical representatives significant methane emission could be detected by gas chro- of millipedes (Diplopoda), cockroaches (Blattaria), termites matography ofgas samples taken at the end ofthe incubation (Isoptera), and scarab beetles (Scarabaeidae), while such meth- period. Under these conditions, all methane-emitting species anogens are absent from 66 other arthropod species investi- produced >100 nmol of methane during the incubation pe- gated. Three types of symbiosis were found: in the first type, riod. All nonproducers failed to produce methane concen- the arthropod's hindgut is colonized by free methanogenic trations higher than the background level (maximum, 10-20 bacteria; in the second type, methanogens are closely associated nmol), even if the incubation time was prolonged and higher with chitinous structures formed by the host's hindgut; the numbers of arthropods were incubated.
    [Show full text]