Stakeholder Engagement Plan Hilcorp Alaska and Harvest Alaska Oil and Gas Actvities Cook Inlet, Alaska

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stakeholder Engagement Plan Hilcorp Alaska and Harvest Alaska Oil and Gas Actvities Cook Inlet, Alaska STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN HILCORP ALASKA AND HARVEST ALASKA OIL AND GAS ACTVITIES COOK INLET, ALASKA Prepared for Hilcorp Alaska, LLC and Harvest Alaska, LLC 3800 Centerpoint Drive, Suite 1400 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Prepared by Fairweather Science LLC 301 Calista Court Anchorage, Alaska 99518 April 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Project Description ............................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 Stakeholder Engagement ................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Alaska Stakeholders ........................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Communities Within the Project Area .......................................................................................... 7 Regional Organizations ......................................................................................................... 7 Chugach Alaska Corporation Tribes in Cook Inlet ............................................................. 11 Cook Inlet Region, Inc. Tribes in Cook Inlet ...................................................................... 13 Salamatof (Salamatowa/Ken Dech’ Etl’t) - “Scrub timber flat” ......................................... 13 Seldovia (Angidahtnu) - “Stream” ...................................................................................... 14 Tyonek (Tubughnen) - “Beach land” .................................................................................. 15 Kenai (Kahtnu) - “River-mouth-river” ................................................................................ 16 Other .................................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Agency Stakeholders ................................................................................................................... 17 5.0 Stakeholder Engagement Plan Implementation ............................................................................ 18 6.0 Schedule ............................................................................................................................................ 18 6.1 Project Contacts ........................................................................................................................... 19 7.0 References ......................................................................................................................................... 20 HILCORP COOK INLET PROJECTS: 2019-2024 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN: DRAFT i FIGURES Figure 1. Geographic region of Project Activities ........................................................................................ 5 Figure 2. Chugach Alaska Corporation (top) and Cook Inlet Region, Inc. Tribes (bottom) ........................ 9 TABLES Table 1. Summary of Planned Activities, 2019-2024. .................................................................................. 6 Table 2. Regional Organization Contacts in Cook Inlet, Alaska ................................................................ 10 Table 3. Contacts in Port Graham, Alaska .................................................................................................. 12 Table 4. Contacts in Nanwalek, Alaska ...................................................................................................... 13 Table 5. Contacts in Ninilchik, Alaska ....................................................................................................... 13 Table 6. Contacts in Salamatof, Alaska ...................................................................................................... 14 Table 7. Contacts in Seldovia, Alaska ........................................................................................................ 15 Table 8. Contacts in Tyonek, Alaska .......................................................................................................... 16 Table 9. Contacts in Kenai, Alaska ............................................................................................................. 16 Table 10. Agency Stakeholder Contacts ..................................................................................................... 17 Table 11. Hilcorp Project Contacts ............................................................................................................. 19 APPENDICES Appendix A - Meeting List HILCORP COOK INLET PROJECTS: 2019-2024 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN: DRAFT ii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AD Anno Domini ADF&G Alaska Department of Fish & Game ANSCA Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act CAC Chugach Alaska Corporation CFR Code of Federal Regulations CIRI Cook Inlet Region, Inc. DNR Department of Natural Resources ft feet IHA Incidental Harassment Authorization km kilometers LOA Letter of Authorization m meters MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act nm nautical miles NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration OCS Outer Continental Shelf POC Plan of Cooperation PSO Protected Species Observer SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan USCG United States Coast Guard USFWS United States Fish & Wildlife Service DEFINITIONS 1. Project: Hilcorp Alaska activities occurring in Cook Inlet from 2019-2024. 2. Stakeholder: An individual or group who has an interest in or may be affected by the project. 3. Stakeholder Engagement: Broadly defined, a systematic process designed to provide clear and consistent information to those people who have an interest in or who might be affected by the project, and to engage people and groups at appropriate, meaningful levels of the decision-making process. 4. Stakeholder Engagement Plan: The document that defines the stakeholders, their role(s) in the decision-making process, and tools used to educate and consult with the stakeholders about a project. 5. Traditional Knowledge: Knowledge gained through long standing tradition or experience of indigenous peoples. HILCORP COOK INLET PROJECTS: 2019-2024 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN: DRAFT 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION Hilcorp Alaska, LLC (Hilcorp Alaska) and Harvest Alaska, LLC (Harvest Alaska) hereinafter referred to jointly as the “Hilcorp” are petitioning the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to promulgate regulations pursuant to Section 101(a)(5) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) for the non-lethal unintentional taking of small numbers of marine mammals incidental to oil and gas exploration, development, and production activities in Cook Inlet, Alaska for the period of five years beginning April 1, 2019 extending through April 1, 2024. A Plan of Cooperation (POC) is a necessary requirement under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) for receipt of a Letter of Authorization (LOA) and Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to mitigate the potential for conflicts between the proposed activity and traditional subsistence activities (50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §18.124(c)(4) and 50 CFR §216.104(a)(12)). The POC must identify the measures that will be taken to minimize any adverse effects on the availability of marine mammals for subsistence uses. In addition, both the USFWS and NMFS require an applicant to communicate and consult with local subsistence communities concerning proposed activity, potential conflicts with subsistence activities, and means of resolving any such conflicts (50 CFR §18.128(d) and 50 CFR §216.104(a) (12) (i), (ii), (iv)). This Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) incorporates the specific requirements of the POC, but also summarizes the strategy for engagement with other stakeholders that may have an interest with Hilcorp’s 5-year exploration and development projects (project). 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The scope of this Petition includes exploration, development, production, and decommissioning activities within the Applicant’s area of operations in and adjacent to Cook Inlet within the Petition’s geographic area (Figure 1). Because Cook Inlet has had active oil and gas activities for over 60 years, this Petition includes all four stages in different areas. Table 1 summarizes the planned activities within the geographic scope of this Petition and the following text describes these activities in more detail. This section is organized into two primary areas within Cook Inlet: lower Cook Inlet (south of the Forelands to Homer) and middle Cook Inlet (north of the Forelands to Susitna/Point Possession). For a detailed project description, please reference the USFWS or NMFS ITR applications. HILCORP COOK INLET PROJECTS: 2019-2024 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN: DRAFT 4 Figure 1. Geographic region of Project Activities HILCORP COOK INLET PROJECTS: 2019-2024 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN: DRAFT 5 Table 1. Summary of Planned Activities, 2019-2024. Year(s) Anticipated Project Name Cook Inlet Region Seasonal Timing Anticipated Noise Sources Planned Duration Marine: 1 source vessel with airgun, 1 Anchor Point 2D seismic Lower Cook Inlet, Anchor node vessel 2021 or 2022 April-October 30 days survey Point to Kasilof Onshore/Intertidal: Shot holes, tracked
Recommended publications
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 5/20/2015
    Page 1 of 7 Average wind speeds are based on the hourly data from 1996-2006 from automated stations at reporting airports (ASOS) unless otherwise noted. Click on a State: Arizona , California , Colorado , Hawaii , Idaho , Montana , Nevada , New Mexico , Oregon , Utah , Washington , Wyoming ALASKA AVERAGE WIND SPEED - MPH STATION | ID | Years | Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec | Ann AMBLER AIRPORT AWOS |PAFM|1996-2006| 6.7 8.5 7.9 7.7 6.7 5.3 4.8 5.1 6.1 6.8 6.6 6.4 | 6.5 ANAKTUVUK PASS AWOS |PAKP|1996-2006| 8.9 9.0 9.1 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.1 8.5 7.6 8.2 9.3 9.1 | 8.6 ANCHORAGE INTL AP ASOS |PANC|1996-2006| 6.7 6.0 7.5 7.7 8.7 8.2 7.8 6.8 7.1 6.6 6.1 6.1 | 7.1 ANCHORAGE-ELMENDORF AFB |PAED|1996-2006| 7.3 6.9 8.1 7.6 7.8 7.2 6.8 6.4 6.5 6.7 6.5 7.2 | 7.1 ANCHORAGE-LAKE HOOD SEA |PALH|1996-2006| 4.9 4.2 5.8 5.7 6.6 6.3 5.8 4.8 5.3 5.2 4.7 4.4 | 5.3 ANCHORAGE-MERRILL FLD |PAMR|1996-2006| 3.2 3.1 4.4 4.7 5.5 5.2 4.8 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.1 2.9 | 4.0 ANIAK AIRPORT AWOS |PANI|1996-2006| 4.9 6.6 6.5 6.4 5.6 4.5 4.2 4.0 4.6 5.5 5.5 4.1 | 5.1 ANNETTE AIRPORT ASOS |PANT|1996-2006| 9.2 8.2 8.9 7.8 7.4 7.0 6.2 6.4 7.2 8.3 8.6 9.8 | 8.0 ANVIK AIRPORT AWOS |PANV|1996-2006| 7.6 7.3 6.9 5.9 5.0 3.9 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.9 6.3 | 5.5 ARCTIC VILLAGE AP AWOS |PARC|1996-2006| 2.8 2.8 4.2 4.9 5.8 7.0 6.9 6.7 5.2 4.0 2.7 3.3 | 4.6 ATKA AIRPORT AWOS |PAAK|2000-2006| 15.1 15.1 13.1 15.0 13.4 12.4 11.9 10.7 13.5 14.5 14.7 14.4 | 13.7 BARROW AIRPORT ASOS |PABR|1996-2006| 12.2 13.1 12.4 12.1 12.4 11.5 12.6 12.5 12.6 14.0 13.7 13.1 | 12.7 BARTER ISLAND AIRPORT |PABA|1996-2006|
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Pt Font Template for Standard Fonts
    Roads and Highways Advisory Board Meeting August 9, 2019 – 10:30 AM – 4:00PM Via Teleconference Anchorage: 4111 Aviation Road, Main Conference Room, Top Floor Call in Number: 1-800-315-6338 Access Code: 39051 Board Members: John Baker, Scott Eickholt, Donna Gardino, Daniel Hall, Anton Johansen, Howard Thies, Aves Thompson 1. Call to Order 2. Board Roll Call to Establish Quorum a. Welcome and Introduction of other participants 3. Phone Roll Call and Introduction of Those Present 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Approval of Minutes 6. Public Comments (3 minutes per speaker) 7. Chair’s Remarks 8. FHWA Presentation – Sandra Gracia-Aline 9. State of Alaska Owned Material Sites – DNR 10. Status of the Ad-Hoc Transportation Advisory Board 11. Capital Budget 12. Freight Program Funding Allocation Process (Sterling Highway) DOT&PF 13. Reinstate the Alaska Exemption – DOT&PF 14. Board Comments 15. Next Meeting – TBD (teleconference) 16. Adjourn ROADS AND HIGHWAYS ADVISORY BOARD MATERIAL SITES QUESTIONS DNR/DMLW RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS – AUGUST 9, 2019 BACKGROUND - ALASKA LAND ACT The Statehood Act authorizes the State of Alaska to select and accept conveyance of the new state’s land entitlement, pursuant to Pub. L. No.85-508. The Alaska Constitution acknowledges that the legislature may authorize different state agencies to manage certain state lands or perform certain duties pursuant to different statutes. The Alaska Land Act was drafted and passed by the first state legislature under Chapter 169, SLA 1959, titled “An Act Relating to Alaska Lands and Resources.” The Alaska Land Act created and established the Division of Land, as well as the Director of Lands, within the Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR).
    [Show full text]
  • KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze Zestawienie Zawiera 8372 Kody Lotnisk
    KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze zestawienie zawiera 8372 kody lotnisk. Zestawienie uszeregowano: Kod ICAO = Nazwa portu lotniczego = Lokalizacja portu lotniczego AGAF=Afutara Airport=Afutara AGAR=Ulawa Airport=Arona, Ulawa Island AGAT=Uru Harbour=Atoifi, Malaita AGBA=Barakoma Airport=Barakoma AGBT=Batuna Airport=Batuna AGEV=Geva Airport=Geva AGGA=Auki Airport=Auki AGGB=Bellona/Anua Airport=Bellona/Anua AGGC=Choiseul Bay Airport=Choiseul Bay, Taro Island AGGD=Mbambanakira Airport=Mbambanakira AGGE=Balalae Airport=Shortland Island AGGF=Fera/Maringe Airport=Fera Island, Santa Isabel Island AGGG=Honiara FIR=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGH=Honiara International Airport=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGI=Babanakira Airport=Babanakira AGGJ=Avu Avu Airport=Avu Avu AGGK=Kirakira Airport=Kirakira AGGL=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova Airport=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova, Santa Cruz Island AGGM=Munda Airport=Munda, New Georgia Island AGGN=Nusatupe Airport=Gizo Island AGGO=Mono Airport=Mono Island AGGP=Marau Sound Airport=Marau Sound AGGQ=Ontong Java Airport=Ontong Java AGGR=Rennell/Tingoa Airport=Rennell/Tingoa, Rennell Island AGGS=Seghe Airport=Seghe AGGT=Santa Anna Airport=Santa Anna AGGU=Marau Airport=Marau AGGV=Suavanao Airport=Suavanao AGGY=Yandina Airport=Yandina AGIN=Isuna Heliport=Isuna AGKG=Kaghau Airport=Kaghau AGKU=Kukudu Airport=Kukudu AGOK=Gatokae Aerodrome=Gatokae AGRC=Ringi Cove Airport=Ringi Cove AGRM=Ramata Airport=Ramata ANYN=Nauru International Airport=Yaren (ICAO code formerly ANAU) AYBK=Buka Airport=Buka AYCH=Chimbu Airport=Kundiawa AYDU=Daru Airport=Daru
    [Show full text]
  • 06-'12, Rural Airports AIP Spending Plan October 20, 2010 DOT/PF, Statewide Aviation
    Draft FFY '06-'12, Rural Airports AIP Spending Plan October 20, 2010 DOT/PF, Statewide Aviation APEB LOCID Project Score Ph FFY'06 FFY'07 FFY'08 FFY'09 FFY'10 FFY'11 FFY'12 After FFY'12 Rural Primary Airports Primary Airfield Projects ANI Aniak Airport Improvements 130 2,3,4 $ 4,700,000 BRW Barrow Apron Expansion 88 2,4 $ 7,000,000 BRW Barrow RWY-Apron Paving/ SA Expan-Stg 3 124 2,4$ 3,000,000 BRW Barrow RWY-Apron Paving/ SA Expan-Stg 4 124 2,4 $ 7,200,000 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 2 BET (GA Apron Expansion) 130 2,4$ 5,701,583 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 3 (Parallel Runway Gravel Surface and BET Lighting) 160 2,4$ 2,733,217 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 4 (Parallel Runway Gravel Surface and BET Lighting) 160 2,4$ 5,877,983 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 5 BET (Parallel Runway Paving) 160 2,4$ 3,277,634 Bethel Parallel RWY and Other Improv--Stg 6 BET (ROW) 130 2,4 $ 1,650,000 BET Bethel West Heavy Apron Expansion 101 2,4 $ 4,000,000 Bethel Airport RWY / TWY / Commerical BET Apron Pavement Rehabilitation (C) N/A 2,4 $ 13,000,000 Bethel Airport RWY / TWY / Commerical BET Apron Pavement Rehabilitation N/A 2,4 $ 13,000,000 BET Bethel South GA Apron Reconstruction (C) N/A 2,4 $ 4,700,000 BET Bethel South GAApron Reconstruction N/A 2,4 $ 4,700,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 1 113 2,4$ 4,499,980 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 2 113 2,4 $ 8,500,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 2 (C) 113 2,4 $ 8,500,000 CDV Cordova Apt Apron, TWY & GA Imp Stg 3 113 2,4 $ 6,700,000 CDV Cordova Apt RSA Expan - Stg 2 N/A 2,4$ 4,346,424 CDV Cordova Apt RSA Improvements (Paving) 65 2,4$ 650,000 Note: Spending Plan contains entitlement and discretionary funded projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Bridge Inventory Report State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Bridge Design Section
    2007 BRIDGE INVENTORY REPORT STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES, BRIDGE DESIGN SECTION Prepared by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES BRIDGE SECTION P.O. BOX 112500 3132 CHANNEL DRIVE JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-2500 ABOUT THE COVER LIBERTY FALLS CREEK EDGERTON HIGHWAY Liberty Falls Creek bridge is a steel arch structure built in 1963. The 90 foot long arch rises over 60 feet above the creek bed. Steel stringer approach spans precede each end of the arch. A scenic, 10-acre campground site, managed by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources, is located just upstream of the arch bridge. The cover artwork was drawn by Cathy Anderson, a drafting technician/artist who works in the Bridge Section. INTRODUCTION This bridge inventory report is a periodic publication by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Bridge Section. Summarized within are structural, dimensional, and location data of bridges and culverts that are biennially inspected by the Bridge Section. Other bridge structures are included for reference and informational purposes. An electronic copy is available online at http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwddes/desbridge/resources.shtml. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS About the Cover ....................................................................................................v Introduction .........................................................................................................vii Table of Contents .................................................................................................ix
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai Peninsula Borough Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2016
    Kenai Peninsula Borough Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2016 Kenai Peninsula Economic Development District Prepared by the University of Alaska Center for Economic Development Pictures are from Community Photo Library, Division of Community and Regional Affairs Executive Summary This Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for the Kenai Peninsula Borough is the result of a region-wide, public planning effort led by the Kenai Peninsula Economic Development District (KPEDD). It sets a vision for the economic growth of the region from 2016 to 2021, and serves as the action plan for KPEDD as the primary entity responsible for economic development initiatives for the Borough as a whole. The CEDS provides an overview of the economic, demographic, and employment trends of the region, places its unique geography in context, and reviews the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Using this background information collected from public datasets and extensive public outreach, the document then lays out the goals, objectives, and strategies for the five-year period, with an eye toward the resiliency of the region as it faces downturns in the oil and gas industry and declining state funds. The Kenai Peninsula Borough is in some respects a microcosm of Alaska as a whole. Its landmass hosts glacial rivers, mountain ranges, spruce forests, and coastal fjords—a sampling of the state’s varied geography. The region’s economy is likewise home to a large resource sector (fisheries, oil, and gas mostly) and a substantial visitor industry built around access to wilderness amenities. Peninsula communities range from rural and remote to urban and well-connected with highways and broadband internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Country IATA ICAO Airport Name Location Served 남극 남극 TNM SCRM Teniente R. Marsh Airport Villa Las Estrellas, Antarctica 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MDZ SAME Gov
    Continent Country IATA ICAO Airport name Location served 남극 남극 TNM SCRM Teniente R. Marsh Airport Villa Las Estrellas, Antarctica 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MDZ SAME Gov. Francisco Gabrielli International Airport (El Plumerillo) Mendoza, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 FMA SARF Formosa International Airport (El Pucú Airport) Formosa, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 RSA SAZR Santa Rosa Airport Santa Rosa, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 COC SAAC Concordia Airport (Comodoro Pierrestegui Airport) Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 GHU SAAG Gualeguaychú Airport Gualeguaychú, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 JNI SAAJ Junín Airport Junín, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MGI SAAK Martín García Island Airport Buenos Aires Province, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 PRA SAAP General Justo José de Urquiza Airport Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 ROS SAAR Rosario - Islas Malvinas International Airport Rosario, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 AEP SABE Jorge Newbery Airpark Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LCM SACC La Cumbre Airport La Cumbre, Córdoba, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 COR SACO Ingeniero Ambrosio L.V. Taravella International Airport (Pajas Blancas) Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 DOT SADD Don Torcuato International Airport (closed) Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 FDO SADF San Fernando Airport San Fernando, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LPG SADL La Plata City International Airport La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 EZE SAEZ Ministro Pistarini International Airport Ezeiza (near Buenos Aires), Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 HOS SAHC Chos Malal Airport (Oscar Reguera Airport) Chos Malal, Neuquén, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 GNR SAHR Dr. Arturo Umberto Illia Airport General Roca, Río Negro, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 APZ SAHZ Zapala Airport Zapala, Neuquén, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LGS SAMM Comodoro D.
    [Show full text]
  • MM Location Type Address Phone Number 0.0 Flow Station 1 POI 0.0
    MM Location Type Address Phone Number 0.0 Flow Station 1 POI 0.0 Deadhorse Airport POI 0.0 Prudhoe Bay Hotel Lodging 0.0 Deadhorse, Alaska POI 0.0 Double Eagle Restaurant Food 0.0 United States Postal Service POI 0.0 Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport POI 0.0 Iniakuk Lake Wilderness Lodge Lodging 0.1 Chevron Food 0.9 Eagle Lodge Lodging 0.9 The Aurora Hotel Lodging 1.6 Brooks Camp Lodging 1.7 US Post Office POI 1.7 Prudhoe Bay General Store Food 1.9 Mile Post 414 Waypoint 2.9 Deadhorse Camp Campground 5.9 Mile Post 410 Waypoint 15.9 Mile Post 400 Waypoint 25.9 Mile Post 390 Waypoint 29.9 Franklin Bluffs POI 35.9 Mile Post 380 Waypoint 45.9 Mile Post 370 Waypoint 55.9 Mile Post 360 Waypoint 56.6 Pump Station 2 POI 60.9 Outhouse POI 60.9 Last Chance Wayside POI 65.9 Mile Post 350 Waypoint 67.7 Sag River Overlook POI 75.9 Mile Post 340 Waypoint 80.9 Happy Valley Airstrip POI 81.2 Happy Valley Airstrip Campground 85.9 Mile Post 330 Waypoint 89.4 Pipeline Border POI 95.9 Mile Post 320 Waypoint 104.6 Pump Station 3 POI 106.4 Mile Post 310 Waypoint 114.4 Slope Mountain POI 116.4 Mile Post 300 Waypoint 121.7 Buried Pipeline for Animal Border POI 126.4 Mile Post 290 Waypoint 126.7 Pipeline Border POI 131.6 Toolik Lake POI 131.6 Toolik Field Station POI 136.4 Mile Post 280 Waypoint 140.0 Summit: 3,074 ft Summit 141.1 Galbraith Campground Turnoff POI 141.5 Galbraith Lake Airport POI 142.1 Galbraith Lake POI 142.7 Galbraith Lake Campground Campground 145.0 Galbraith Bridge POI 146.4 Mile Post 270 Waypoint 147.3 Pump Station 4 POI 154.3 Raised
    [Show full text]
  • Doris Rhodes Slides, B1993.020
    REFERENCE CODE: AkAMH REPOSITORY NAME: Anchorage Museum at Rasmuson Center Bob and Evangeline Atwood Alaska Resource Center 625 C Street Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: 907-929-9235 Fax: 907-929-9233 Email: [email protected] Guide prepared by: Sara Piasecki, Photo Archivist TITLE: Doris Rhodes Slides COLLECTION NUMBER: B1993.020 OVERVIEW OF THE COLLECTION Dates: 1943-1985 Extent: 4 boxes; 4 linear feet Language and Scripts: The collection is in English. Name of creator(s): Doris Nye Rhodes, Thurston M. Nye, Vida Nye, Griffin’s, Malcolm Lockwood, Vic Hessler, Arctic Circle Enterprises, Robinson Studios, Steve McCutcheon, Cecil Rhode, Robert A. Hall, B. Hulm, Jim Shives, Meston’s, Vacation Films Administrative/Biographical History: Vida Nye arrived in Anchorage in 1942 with her husband, Thurston Nye. The couple had been living in Toledo, Oregon, where Thurston worked at the sawmill. The two spent three months establishing residency in Alaska before being allowed to work; Thurston spent the three months working for alcohol supplier Milt Odom. Vida soon found work at Ft. Richardson in hangar D-47, where materiel for the war in the Aleutians was received and shipped out. Vida and Thurston stayed in Anchorage until 1946, when they drove out the Alaska Highway. The couple returned in 1955 and died in Anchorage, Vida in January 1978 and Thurston in August 1979. Doris Nye Rhodes and Glen Rhodes co-owned a sawmill on the Oregon coast for eight years, then shipped the mill to Anchorage in 1955. In Alaska, they opened Bird Creek Sawmill on Turnagain Arm with Thurston Nye. After selling the sawmill, Glen found employment with the Anchorage School District, where he worked for more than 20 years at the school bus garage, retiring as foreman.
    [Show full text]
  • And Type Chapter Number
    Mount Vernon Avenue Bridge Project Air Quality Study Report Prepared by the California Department of Transportation CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 08-SBd-0-Mount Vernon Avenue BRLS-6507(003) EA 965120 December 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ vii Chapter 1 Proposed Project ............................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.1 Project Purpose ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2.2 Project Need ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1-2 Chapter 2 Regulatory Setting ..........................................................................................2-1 2.1 Federal Clean Air Act ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Transportation Conformity ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 State
    [Show full text]