Rapid Need Assessment Report A rapid need assessment of temporarily dislocated persons (TDPs) of North Waziristan Agency living in District and Tehsil Bannu,Union Council Havid.
May 2016
Prepared by: MOJAZ Foundation
MOJAZ FOUNDATION 8-A, Street 32, F-8/1, Islamabad
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
Page | 2
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
Contents
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS ...... 4
INTRODUCTION ...... 5
KEY LIMITATIONS OF ASSESSMENT ...... 5
BACKGROUND (CONFLICT PROFILE) ...... 5
HOST COMMUNITIES IN DISTRICT BANNU ...... 6
OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY ...... 7
ABOUT THE STUDY ...... 7
METHODOLOGY AND ASSESSMENT TOOLS ...... 8
SAMPLES ...... 9
TIMELINE ...... 10
TARGET AREA SELECTION ...... 10
TARGET AREA (UC HAVID) PROFILE ...... 10
TDPS FAMILY COMPOSITION ...... 11
ON-GOING ASSISTANCE (GOVERNMENT, UN AND I/NGO’S) ...... 11
SECTOR WISE SYNOPSIS ...... 12
SHELTER AND SETTLEMENTS ...... 12 WASH ...... 13 HEALTH ...... 14 FOOD SECURITY AND LIVELIHOODS ...... 15
FINDINGS OF KII ...... 16
RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 17
2.
Page | 3
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
List of Abbreviations & Acronyms
MF MOJAZ Foundation HHs Households UCs Union Councils TDPs Temporarily Dislocated Persons FGDs Focal Group Discussions KII Key Informant Information NFI Non Food Items NWA North Waziristan Agency PDMA Provincial disaster Management Authority NDMA National disaster Management Authority WFP World Food Program FR Frontier Region FATA Federally Administered Tribal Areas ADF Alfalah Development Foundation CDP Pak Community Development Programme CSO Community Support Organization OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs BHU Basic Health Unit NADRA National Database Registration Authority
Page | 4
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
Introduction This report provides a snapshot of the most pressing needs of TDPs settled in 7 villages of Union Council Havid, conducted in the beginning of April 2016 and was revalidated in May 2016 after Rapid Fund’ s recent call for proposals. The initial need assessment was carried out by filling up household survey forms, FDG, KIIs and transect walk. The findings were analyzed and the report was prepared. After RF announced call for proposals in April, MF again conducted meetings with AC office Bannu, PDMA, Shelter Cluster Bannu and carried out focus group discussions in three villages. The community confirmed that the repatriation in the proposed UC has not yet started and they are still in need of shelter as top priority. The villages identified are having large number of affected families.
Key Limitations of Assessment
Due to the emergency context and short time available for the assessment, data was collected through meetings and focus group discussions. A number of TDPs declined to participate in the data collection and/or expressed frustration that many assessments were being carried out but not followed up by humanitarian assistance. TDPs were closely intermingled with host communities, which occasionally made it difficult to single out TDPs when collecting data.
Background (Conflict profile) The Pakistani military offensive in North Waziristan Agency that started on 15th of June 2014 has so far resulted in more than 0.5 million TDPs. As of 19th of November 2014, FDMA and UNHCR jointly reported that More than 0.5 million people had 161,081 registered families have fled to other parts of the been displaced, 74 % of them were country. Most of the TDPs have found shelter in Bannu, Dera children and women. Ismail Khan, Peshawar, Lakki Marwat and other districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
The armed conflict across FATA has widely affected the living conditions of its inhabitants. The terrorist attacks and aircraft bombings in North Waziristan have destroyed the houses in the area leaving the residents with no other choice than to migrate. As a result, in February 2014, a large number of people displaced in the nearby districts of Bannu, DI Khan, Tank, Lakki Marwat and Kohat. On 15 June 2014, the Pakistan government announced a full-fledged operation. On 18 June, 2014 people were allowed to leave North Waziristan (NWA) and as of 26 June, more than 0.5 million people had been displaced, 74 % of them Page | 5
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
were children and women. (Reference: NWA Rapid protection assessment by protection cluster, June 2014).In total 74% TDPs are registered families.
Official Return started from April 2015 on slow pace. The Return included 131,245 registered return gradually picked more pace as Govt. is declaring areas families and 20% returning families safe for their return with complete clean sweep from the are women headed households and insurgents. Currently returns are ongoing to all five agencies at-least 28% of return families have of FATA. Six embarkation points have been established to at-least one pregnant women in their facilitate return process. Assistance hubs are active within household FATA for the distribution of Humanitarian assistance. Over -UN OCHA 131,245 TDPs have returned. However, 29,836 families are still dislocated/displaced. Govt. is providing return package which includes PKR. 400,000 for fully demolished houses, PKR. 160,000 for partially damaged houses, PKR. 10,000 for transportation cost and 25,000 return grant. As per the OCHA weekly return reports, still there is huge gap in anticipated return against actual return. In other report of OCHA regarding priority needs in displacement and returns; Food and shelter are among top rated needs. While WFP/VAM also assessed needs of the returning families and they have ranked WASH, livelihood, infrastructure and education are among top rated needs after their return to their homelands.
(Reference: GOP and UNHCRTDP fact sheet (30-Apr-16)
Host Communities in District Bannu
The district Bannu is approximately 192 kilometers to the south of Peshawar and lies in a Sedimentary basin. Geographically, the modern day Bannu is located in the heart of the southern region with its boundaries touching the districts of Karak, Lakki Marwat and the North, South Waziristan Agencies. Total population of the district is estimated 677350 (1998 Census) with annual growth rate of 2.81 %. According to district government sources, the current estimated host population of District Bannu is 971,932 persons comprised of 502,197 males and 469,735 females. The area of Bannu is 1,227 km2 and the population density used to be 792 per km2 but the influx of TDPs has almost doubled the total population of District Bannu.
The District of Bannu in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has experienced a large influx of TDPs from the North Wazirstan Agency since the conflict escalated there in 2014. According to UNOCHA the District of Bannu hosts over 500,000 TDPs living with host communities, with 249,042 males, 281,829 female, 445,134 children (Source: Federal Disaster Management Authority) half of these being children. Page | 6
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
A comparison between the host and TDP populations at UC level is given as Annex-1.
Source: AC office, Bannu
Objective, Scope and Limitations of the Study The objective of this study was to assess the current status of still displaced families from North Waziristan Agency (NWA) living with the host community in different pockets of Bannu District. Noticing the situation, MOJAZ Foundation initiated the assessment in Bannu District, where majority (i.e. 56,974 which makes 35% of all) of the displaced families are residing. MOJAZ Foundation has recently completed (i.e. February 2016) Transitional Shelter project in UC Takhti Khel and MOJAZ have the sufficient information regarding TDPs as mentioned in the previous need assessments and proposal. To identify the current situation of UC Havid, MOJAZ Foundation conducted this study which aims to identify the main needs, locations, and gaps in the current situation. Based on these findings, recommendations for further action, with a gender disaggregated analysis of specific needs aimed to inform assistance for the displaced families. The data was collected through household surveys, Key Informant interviews and focus group discussions in 7 villages of UC Havid having large number of affected families. Timeline was definitely strict to conduct the assessment process which will cover all aspects of lives of TDPs living in UC Havid. Men respondents were easily accessible to conduct interviews and they were cooperative to answer all questions. However it was difficult to approach women due to strict cultural barriers (Pardah). Therefore a female enumerator was engaged to approach women respondents. Since there has been no exact data on location of TDPs therefore random sampling technique was adopted.
About the Study In order to have a first-hand knowledge about the problems being faced by the TDPs communities, a comprehensive semi-structured questionnaire1 developed by Concern RF specifically for the proposed region was used. The questionnaire covered following information:
1. Identification data of the respondent like name, address, gender, etc. (optional). 2. Household profile i.e. the total members and their gender and age. 3. Status of Respondent.
1 Questionnaire attached Page | 7
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
4. Assistance received 5. Shelter and Settlement assessment. 6. Assessment of WASH conditions and practices. 7. Assessment of primary health situation. 8. Food Security and livelihoods assessment. 9. Prioritization of needs along with the level of importance.
Methodology and Assessment Tools Methodology used for the assessment included both qualitative and quantitative tools. Moreover, focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted using FGD checklist2. In order to further refine the data collection and to ensure the authenticity of assessment, triangulation was done by conducting transect walk (for direct Observations) in villages followed by short key informant Interviews with social activists, BHU staff and local CSOs members. The information received was correlated with each other to derive meaningful conclusions.
In total, 7 FGDs in 7 villages of UC Havid were conducted. These FGDs were executed subsequent to filling the household interviews of 95 TDP households. Since there has been no exact data on location of TDPs therefore random sampling technique was adopted. Those villages were selected with TDPs heavy presence indication of local activists and Govt. officials. Survey was completed including household formats, FGDs and KIIs on the indication of local community members regarding TDPs current point of stay. FGDs were found extremely useful as peer group of TDPs verifying and validating information at the same time of FDG. This makes information more reliable and quality in short time to complete exercise.
In addition to the 7 KIIs and 7 FGDs, additional data was drawn from reports of UNHCR, OCHA & DRC, the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), and the government offices, visits to the offices of local organizations working in Bannu (Prepared, IRP, Pak CDP & lead of Wash cluster), interviews with BHU staff, Vaccinators and the notables from the community.
Activity Number of Number of Location Date Participants Interviews
FGDs 56 07 UC Havid April 08-10, 2016 KII 07 07
2 Check list attached Page | 8
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
Individual HH 95 95 questionnaires
Please note that the revalidation of the data was carried out by MOJAZ from 3rd May to 5th May as the need assessment was carried out almost a month ago. For this purpose, meetings were conducted with PDMA, AC Office, Shelter Cluster and KIIs with the community in three villages of the proposed UC. The findings were consistant of the finding of the need assessment carried out in April, 2016.
For proper data collection, teams were mobilized to do the rapid need assessment for 1 UC of Bannu. In total 2 teams (1 team had a female enumerator) were formed having local staff from the recently completed project. Each team was allocated 4 and 3 villages respectively of UC Havid for the assessment purposes using above mentioned tools.
Samples Standard confidence level of 95 percent, co-efficient of variance as 40 percent, and margin for error is 5 percent was used to calculate the following sample size. MOJAZ team of enumerators visited 07 sites/villages in selected UC in District Bannu having large number of affected families. The list is mentioned in following table:
No. of FGD No. of FDG HH Survey Displaced Sr. Village survey Participants Participants families
1 Faqir Abad LandiDak 1 FGD 8 14 68 8 2 HavaidKhas 1 FGD 14 70 8 3 KaskeyLandiDak 1 FGD 04 64 8 4 Khan SubaLandiDak 1 FGD 13 85 8 5 MultaniLandiDak 1 FGD 14 75 8 6 SardiKhelLandiDak 1 FGD 15 80 8 7 SheikhanLandiDak 1 FGD 11 63
Page | 9
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
95 Total 7 FGDs 56 Participants 505 Participants
Timeline The assessment was carried out in April and is revalidated in May 2016 and finalized in light of latest situation prevailing on ground on May 3rd to 5th, 2016.
Sr. No. Activity Timeline 1 Target Area selection April 05, 2016 2 Team selection April 06, 2016 3 Team orientation April 07, 2016 4 Pre-testing of tools by sample data collection and filling April 7, 2016 5 Data collection through field visits April 8-10, 2016 6 Report compilation April 11, 2016 7 Revalidation Visit May 3- 5, 2016 8 Finalization of Initial need Assessment Report May 6, 2016
Target Area Selection Area selection was done in close coordination with PDMA office in Bannu, clusters and previously conducted Need Assessment for our shelter project. Furthermore, meetings were organized with different stakeholders as per need during the need assessment exercise by MOJAZ. MOJAZ selected UC Havid based on the following parameters:
Having most number of TDPs as compared to other UCs Having very low response by organizations No ongoing assistance by any partner Shelter cluster endorsement (email attached)
Target Area (UC Havid) Profile Selected UC is the part of Bannu Tehsil and is a settled area notified by FDMA and Govt. Havid is a town and union council of Bannu District in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. UC Havid is located on border with district lakki and its neighboring UCs is Nurar, Mama Khel & Mandev.
Sr# Information Detail
Page | 10
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
1 UC Name Havid 2 UC TDP Population 34,628 3 UC Host Population 25,969 4 Number of villages 12 villages 5 Average Population per village 2500-3000 6 Govt. Infrastructure includes: Roads, Government buildings, canals 7 Number of Girls and Boys schools Girls 8 Boys 13 8 Number of health facilities (like BHU, RHC etc.) Civil Dispensaries 4, BHU 1 9 Number of TDPs (individuals and HH) 34,628 individuals 3,320 HH 10 Number/Percentage of Registered TDPs 90% 11 Number/Percentage of Non-Registered TDPs 10% 12 Average Family Size of TDPs 10.43 13 Number of Minorities TDPs Nil 14 Number of Disable TDPs 135 persons 15 Number/Percentage of Women, Men and Children Women 29%, Men 26%, Children 45% Does IDP bring some assets from their Homes? Livestock (somehow), Clothes, Cash & 16 (Livestock, household utensils or clothes etc.) Jewelry 17 % of TDPs living with relatives/Tribes mate/friends 29.4% 18 % of TDPs living in Tents 5% 19 % of TDPs living in Govt. Camps/ Any other sources 0.3% 20 % of TDPs living in Rented houses in target area 51.8% 21 % of TDPs living in open compounds 13.5%
TDPs Family Composition The average household size was found to be 10.43; importantly, children and women constitute 74% of the household size, and 90% of households are registered. No religious minority families found in UC Havid during the assessment process. In total, there are 11% elderly population and 0.52% Disables. Based on the previous assessments conducted, it is estimated that 90% of the TDPs residing in this UC are registered.
On-going Assistance (Government, UN and I/NGO’s) In UC Havid, only one humanitarian organization i.e. Islamic Help responded to the needs of TDPs. UNHCR, WFP, FDMA and NADRA also conducted TDPs verification and registration. Other assistance by WFP included Food and Govt. standard assistance i.e. cash allowances is available to this conflict affected TDPs. With respect to other cluster activities no response was launched by any organization. Govt. cash allowance is usually disbursed on Govt. discretion when they have ample funds or else distribution takes
Page | 11
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
place on events like EID etc. But the amount is clearly insufficient to cater needs of rent, travel, food, Health etc. The revalidation also revealed that no other agency is working in the area. The shelter Cluster also confirmed that no agency is currently working in the area and sector too.
Sector Wise Synopsis
Shelter and Settlements TDPs shared shelter types currently used with percentages depicted underneath during the assessment: 29.4% TDPs living with relatives/Tribes mate/friends 5% TDPs living in Tents 0.3% of TDPs living in Govt. Camps/ Any other sources 51.8% of TDPs living in Rented houses in target area 13.5% of TDPs living in open compounds
Earlier displacements in 2014 patterns indicated that up to 10% of the displaced population opted to live in camps and 90% with host communities. There is evidence that many TDPs (in particular vulnerable categories such as female headed households have been excluded from the Government’s registration and thus the cash grants due to technicalities such as the lack of a Computerized National Identity Card (CNIC). Thus no rental support throughout the displacement period and event not after return. UNHCR provided tents for emergency shelter assistance after the rapid displacement in 2014 but couldn’t manage complete coverage. And those tents were damaged within a period of 12 months. Again putting TDP families in difficult position with needs especially of women and children who need more protection from weather harshness, privacy and security are unmet. Since 4-5 families are sharing 1 shelter which does not meet the needs at all but provided the situation on ground, both hosts and TDPs are surviving with available limited space options. This situation along with sharing of one shelter by 4 to 5 families extremely worsens the living conditions for the host families particularly of women.
A prolonged stay of TDPs without access to accommodation options, basic services and NFIs tend to create tensions between the TDPs and host communities. Women’s cultural need for purdah, or privacy, has also limited their movement as TDPs more generally. Displaced women reported feeling unsafe while on sharing shelter with other families and in crowded places, and when using toilet and washing facilities that in many cases are shared with men.
Page | 12
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
There was no privacy in the settlements – 100% of displaced people accessed during assessment shared this concern requesting if nothing could have been managed partition may have made their lives better off as compared to prevailing worse situation. The study conducted by IDMC (internal displacement monitoring center) revealed that 15% of the displaced women interviewed reported they had been subjected to verbal abuse from their husbands after displacement, a behavior they said they had not witnessed before they were forced to leave their homes Those who are sharing or living in shared houses are not fully available houses; they have hired/using only a room to shelter their families with hosts. During assessment, TDP respondents shared that those who are living with relatives 4-5 families are sharing same room spaces due to non-availability of other space or money to pay rent. Average family size was found 10.43 persons per family. All women and children sleep inside rooms and men and boys stay in Hujras due to Pardah3 practice and women’s privacy needs. 99% of the respondents mentioned that current residential facilities do not meet their minimum needs. Majority of women shared that they spend whole day in the compounds under open sun and 95% boys and men tend to stay out of house due to space and Pardah. Since most of the schools are not functional, children spend most of their time at home. It was also mentioned that due extra exposure to open sun and children often catch fever and diseases due to less resting times and sleep.
WASH Prime sources of water are Govt. supply pipes, tube wells and water channels running in agriculture fields. 19% respondent shared they are taking household consumption and drinking water from the tube wells near their areas, 75% respondent are getting water from the distance of 500-1000 meters from tube wells, masjid tapes, 20% respondents are getting water from less than 500 meters and 5% respondents getting water from the distance of 1KM – 2KM . 68% shared that they have enough water for daily cooking and drinking while 32% shared insufficient drinking water. Upon examination of water appeared to be clean (transparent) but the change in taste and odor at few villages can be observed easily by tasting it after a while. However TDPs had no other option but to use the available resource. TDPs are facing more problems regarding water collection as they have to rely on available resource after host usage and TDPs have to move out in quest of water for household’s chores. Due to limited resources currently no water treatment or cleaning method was observed. On average almost 70% are using water from unprotected sources such as water channels, tube wells and bore holes etc.
3 A religious and social practice of female seclusion prevalent among Muslim communities in general and strongly practices among Pakhtoon tribes. Page | 13
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
Hygiene practices were observed to be very poor as no TDP approached have ever received hygiene session and not practice hand washing at all critical times. Soap availability is reported by only 15% of the TDPs and among host the ratio is bit high at 40%. Respondents mentioned no resources as a reason for not washing their hands and bathing. Washing hands at-least 3 out of 5 critical times is not followed by majority as many as 60% due to lack of water readily available and hygiene material like Soap etc. Hand Washing Practices Yes No At-least 3 to 5 critical times a day 40% 60% Availability of Soap in TDPs 15% 85% Availability of Soap in Host 40% 60% Access to Water from protected and clean 70% (unprotected) 30% (Protected) sources
Moreover, in targeted areas, as per the assessment results, 5% of families have access to separate toilets for themselves inside the premises while 95% are practicing open defecation. In specific, in each house, there are only self-made pit single latrine is available which is used both for bathing as well as for defecation. In general, 35 to 40people sharing/depending one toilet. This situation directly raising the hygiene issues especially for women and children. Due to increase in number of persons per latrine, pits are filled resultantly and increase smell and flies. During the need assessment, temporary latrines visited, were damaged and pits are full which is leading them again to defecate openly. During assessment, respondents shared that cleaning is difficult as more families are forced to use available limited resource and no one takes ownership. If 2-3 relatives can be provided latrine, than they can clean and maintain it with increased sense of ownership.
Following table show the overall WASH situation among the assessed communities: please change it with the use of latrine or availability of latrine.
Open defecation Yes (95%) No (5%) Individual latrine for one family 5% 95% Persons per existing latrine 35-40
Health There is only one functional BHU in the targeted UC and is available to all residents after covering an average distance of 5-8 KM. This facility is providing OPD services to the inhabitants (hosts and TDPs). 25% move towards district hospitals in the town, 36% use the BHU for first aid. Due to distance almost 39% respondents shared that they have not used the facilities when needed due to distance and no resources to reach there. Most common diseases shared by the respondents are diarrhea; skin diseases, cough and
Page | 14
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
malaria are common. Besides this, 6% women were reported to be pregnant at the time of assessment and falls in different quarters of pregnancy. It was mentioned the deliveries were managed at their residence by traditional birth attendants available in adjacent areas. 3 elders mentioned that they heard of a medical mobile camp by PRCS in last year but it was a confined for a specific time.
67% of the respondents shared that they have the facility of private clinics but due to distance and resources to reach there, 19% expressed that they have the facility of BHU but they are providing only medical facilities, 6% of the respondents mentioned that they heard the facility of Civil dispensary and DHQ but couldn’t availed the service due to long distance. Almost half of that number, mostly children and women, face serious health hazards due to poor hygienic conditions, in addition to severe weather which has increased ARI (Acute Respiratory Infection), gastro infections, skin and other water borne diseases. Living in highly unhygienic conditions has multiplied their problems and the infection ratio is very high due to poor sanitation. Most people are suffering from diseases as they are living in highly congested environment with at least 20 to 25 people living in one room. Furthermore, he said the drinking water and toilet facilities at the host families houses and schools were really poor and could not cater to their needs.
Food Security and Livelihoods As per the response recorded during interviews of the TDPs, following the breakdown of major occupations:
Agriculture Daily Comm Govt. Foreign Others/FDMA Audience Livestock /Livestock Labor erce Job Remittances assistance
TDPs prior to 40%, 20%, 18%, 7% 2% 13% 0% displacement TDPs after displacement 2% 2% 3% 0% 0% 3.5% 86.5%
Other source of income suggests the relief package provided by FDMA through ATM cards which is temporary. At present, there are no such or very meager economic opportunities for TDPs. In pursuit of work in order to meet their minimum living expenses they are compelled to go out for daily wages, which is on irregular basis. Because of exigent monetary circumstances, older people and non-adults are strained to work as labor for track daily wage laboring, garbage collection and work in shops so that they can contribute to minimize their dependents suffering.
Page | 15
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
To overcome the food timidity, majority of TDPs families are forced to sell their remaining possessions and assets. In addition, due to the less livelihood opportunities and consumption of food stocks, affected people are selling the livestock at low prices. The recent displacement, less livelihood opportunities and income directly affect the diet pattern of the displaced population prompted less intakes than usual especially for women and children.
After displacement there is a huge disparity existing due to volatile situation. TDP’s income has dropped to zero and they are now resource less (no financial or social). Before displacement average monthly income was around 11-15k which dropped to 0k. Only those (i.e. 35-40 TDP families out of total) have foreign remittances to manage their expenses and trying to assist other relative families as maximum as possible. This is leading them to manage in whatever they have and compromising basic needs like no proper medical care, poor hygienic condition and lack of necessary household utensils and other NFIs.
On inquiring the pattern of need based expenses following responses were recorded with percentages:
Food 25% House rent 1% Shelter 8% Transportation 19% Medicines 5% Education 0% Clothing 4% 0% (currently not in a position to repay but once they are back to Loan repayment their home or have income resource they will start repaying) Others include nonfood items 18%
Findings of KII MOJAZ Foundation triangulated the information provided by the TDPs and Host communities during the initial need assessment exercise as also summarized above in order to be sure that community mentioned correct information. In total 7 KIIs were conducted with BHU staff, community elders, cluster, PDMA and other local NGOs.The information collected through the primary sources was verified and found supporting the analyses with respect to the damages and the assistance providers mentioned above in each thematic areas. Community elders focused on the prime need of shelters and wash in order to live properly during the displacement period.
Page | 16
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
Prioritization was done by MOJAZ team observations and by asking all the respondents reached through survey. And they have ranked their needs which are tabulated which clearly confirm that shelter is their top need with WASH on second place:
% 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Remarks Respondents Priority Priority Priority Priority Priority
100% Shelter Wash Livelihood Health Non Food 100% respondents Items shared that Shelter & WASH are their urgent need.
Recommendations Our recommendations are based upon the analysis of data collected from 95 respondents out of the total population and interventions proposed are based upon this data. The data may have some variations when a post-approval assessment would be carried out and further facts may reveal which may require few adjustments in the said activities. However, based on the findings of the initial survey, following recommendations are being made for an efficient implementation of Shelter & Settlement intervention
Summarizing the assessment and its findings, MOJAZ carefully chosen Transitional Shelter as a response based on the strong justifications and genuine needs of TDPs who are living in misery. And it’s expected to reduce burden on existing resources, their protection & privacy issues will also reduce, will reunite TDP families and lessen the burden on the hosts. And top of all that transitional shelter will be carried back to TDPs areas of origin for giving shelter while rehabilitation of their lives from rubble.
Ser. Conclusions Recommendations MOJAZ related experience
1 There is a huge demand Adequate and culturally sensitive MOJAZ has technical of shelters and Wash temporary shelter arrangements such expertise in shelter sector. intervention as emergency shelters are among the Experience gained by key concerns of the TDPs. implementing 3 emergency and 4
Page | 17
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
transitional shelter projects in Sindh/KPK.
Anex-1: List of Bannu UCs with population and TDPs figures from AC office.
Host
# Union Council TDPs
Population
1 Slam Sikandar Khel 4243 15203
2 Sani I 4642 -
3 Anzal 5803 -
4 Mandan 6314 18427
5 FatehKhelQusar 6805 15339
6 Hassani 7047 16822
7 Mama Khel 8280 17054
8 SikanderKhelBala 8373 15692
9 Ghori Wala 8742 20596
10 NizamDarmaKhel 9119 16743
11 Kaki - 2 9144 14169
12 Amandi 10197 18164
13 khawjamad 10727 14462
Page | 18
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
14 Mandare 11012 14522
15 Ismail Khel 11040 15021
16 JaniKhelMustaraka 11433 17827
17 Khojari 11523 15238
18 Norar 11575 17176
19 MamandKhelWazir 12316 19268
20 Fatima Khel 12684 26198
21 SparkaWazir 12826 -
22 Barat 14010 25422
23 Khandar Khan Khel 14764 26143
24 JandiKhel 14856 15936
25 ZirakiPirbaKhel 15023 22564
26 MitiKhel 15834 20148
27 ShabazAzmatKhel 16774 15430
28 Aral 2 17658 -
29 Arat 1 18203 23910
30 KotKalandar 18663 21517
Page | 19
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
31 Kala KhelMasti Khan 18828 23761
32 LaloZai 19399 23257
33 Kaki - 1 19813 24631
34 Mira Khel 20408 18500
35 Koti Sadat 20476 16580
36 TakhtiKhel 24953 22801
37 Nar Jafar 27616 22817
38 BakaKhel 29001 18274
39 Hindi Khel 29572 19951
40 MambatiBarakzai 29992 17986
41 Dawood Shah 30090 19434
42 ShamshiKhel 31088 23506
43 MamashKhel 33243 22134
44 SokariZabta Khan 34238 -
45 HavidLandidak 34628 25969
46 Bazar Ahmad Khan 35730 18382
47 BizanKhel 50294 27903
Page | 20
Rapid Need Assessment Report – UC Havid of District Bannu
Page | 21