Rapid Needs Assessment II
Summary of Findings - November 2014
Displaced Populations of North Waziristan Agency in District Bannu
Union Councils: Koti Sadat, Fatma Khel, Bazar Ahmad Khan, Ghoriwala, Amandi, Kausar Fateh Khel, Bharat, Nar Jaffer & Khaujari
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 0 | 14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected]
DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Acronyms
CoRe Community Restoration cluster DRC Danish Refugee Council FATA Federally Administered Tribal Areas FDMA FATA Disaster Management Authority GoP Government of Pakistan IVAP IDP Vulnerability Assessment & Profiling KII Key Informant Interviews KP Khyber Pakhtunkhwa MIRA Multi-sector Initial Rapid Assessment NADRA National Database & Registration Authority NWA North Waziristan Agency PDMA Provincial Disaster Management Authority PKR Pakistan Rupee RRS Return and Rehabilitation Strategy TDPs Temporarily Dislocated Persons UC Union Council UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund UNOCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 1|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Introduction
The present report provides a snapshot of some of the most pressing needs as of the 24th of November 2014 among the Temporarily Dislocated Persons1 (TDPs) from North Waziristan Agency (NWA) in nine union councils (UCs) of District Bannu: Koti Sadat, Fatma Khel, Bazar Ahmad Khan, Ghoriwala, Amandi, Kausar Fateh Khel, Bharat, Nar Jaffar & Khaujari. This report is based on the second2 Bannu rapid needs assessment conducted by Danish Refugee Council (DRC) in late November 2014, which focused specifically on needs within winterization, shelter and livelihoods – both in place of displacement and origin.
Methodology & Scope
From the 20th to 23rd of November 2014, DRC sent out a team to District Bannu to gather primary data from the TDPs and host community elders in nine designated Union Councils. The following qualitative and quantitative data collection tools were designed and utilized: key informant interviews (KIIs), individual interviews/questionnaires and group discussions. Where applicable, broadly recognized standards (e.g. Sphere and IVAP) were incorporated in the design of tools. The data was collected from 37 villages spread across the aforementioned nine UCs in District Bannu, targeting the most TDP populous villages in each UC. 143 individual questionnaires were obtained from TDPs (72 males and 71 females). In addition, 22 KIIs were conducted with host community and TDP elders and 12 group discussions were carried out (7 male and 5 female). Reliable secondary sources such as from FATA Disaster Management Authority (FDMA), Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA), National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA), United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) provided additional data to this report. The secondary data has been combined with updates from primary sources to corroborate findings and provide further details. The findings presented in the needs assessment below are primarily based on data collected from the 143 individual questionnaires. However, all data provided in this report has been corroborated with information from the KIIs, group discussions, enumerators’ own observations, and available secondary sources, which has ensured a strong degree of triangulation. This report is intended to inform the planning of DRC’s emergency response in Bannu. In addition, DRC has chosen to make this data freely available so that they can be used for triangulation and/or programming purposes by other humanitarian actors in Bannu. The information contained in this report may hence be used by other organisations and actors as long as DRC Pakistan is appropriately referenced as the source and the content not used in a misguiding manner.
1 The Government of Pakistan has officially termed the displaced population of North Waziristan as “Temporarily Dislocated Persons”. The abbreviation “TDPs” will be used in this report in accordance with this terminology. 2 The findings from DRC’s first rapid needs assessment in Bannu were similarly summarized in a report: “Bannu Rapid Needs Assessment – summary of findings”, September 2014.
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 2|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Key Limitations of Assessment . Due to the emergency context and short time available for the assessment, data was collected through purposive sampling.
. Assessment fatigue was detected. A number of TDPs declined to participate in the data collection and/or expressed frustration that many assessments were being carried out but not followed up by humanitarian assistance.
. TDPs were closely intermingled with host communities, which occasionally made it difficult to single out TDPs when collecting data.
Coordination
Coordination was carried out in relevant clusters (e.g. for community restoration) and through bilateral meetings with interested parties (e.g. with IVAP, UNHCR and PDMA). This has refined the scope and focus of the rapid needs assessment and highlighted a number of important aspects to be taken into account, such as an ongoing comprehensive distribution of winterization kits facilitated by the UN as well as ongoing efforts to develop a Return and Rehabilitation Strategy (RRS) for the NWA TDPs.
Situation Update Displaced Population from NWA The Pakistani military offensive in North Waziristan Agency that started on 15th of June 2014 has so far resulted in more than one million TDPs3. As of 19th of November 2014, FDMA reported that 102,047 registered families have fled to other parts of the country. Most of the TDPs have found shelter in Bannu, Dera Ismail Khan, Peshawar, Lakki Marwat and other districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
TDPs in Bannu District Bannu has received an estimated 829,000 TDPs according to PDMA-MIS. With an average household size of 10.43, the total number of displaced families is thus estimated at 79,482 (Annex I.a). This means that 77% of the total registered TDPs are residing in District Bannu, which is slightly less than the 81% previously reported by DRC. These updated figures reflect a new influx of TDPs from NWA. NADRA has now verified 79% of the registered TDPs (previously 56%). For various reasons an unknown number of TDPs remain unregistered with NADRA. The figures used in this report all relate to TDPs registered by Government of Pakistan (GoP)4. According to local government sources, 35 out of 48 UCs are hosting more than 1,000 TDP families and the most TDP populous UC is Benzi/Bizan Khel, which hosts 4,822 families. Annex I.b shows from highest to lowest the concentration of TDPs in the 48 UCs of District Bannu.
3 http://fdma.gov.pk/index.php/component/content/article/4-news-a-events/151-tdps-statistics 4 The Government of Pakistan, United Nations and the humanitarian community have agreed to use figures, which are based upon the total registered number of families at Saidgai-Baka Khel check post.
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 3|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Host Communities in District Bannu
According to district government sources, the estimated host population of District Bannu is 971,932 persons comprised of 502,197 males and 469,735 females. The area of Bannu is 1,227 km2 and the population density used to be 792 per km2 but the influx of TDPs has almost doubled the total population of District Bannu. A comparison between the host and TDP populations at UC level is given in Annex II. Target Population of Danish Refugee Council
DRC Pakistan has been allowed to conduct needs assessments and provide humanitarian assistance5 to TDPs in nine UCs6. 18% of all the TDPs in Bannu are residing in these nine UCs, which corresponds to a population size of 147,783 persons (14,169 families) consisting of 66,502 children, 42,857 women and 38,428 men. Breakdown of TDP population in the nine UCs targeted by DRC is illustrated in the graph below:
16 18 16 12 14 10 12 9 9 10 Thousands 85% 15% 8 7 6 8 6 5 6 5 5 6 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 2 0 Bazar Nar Koti Barat Fatima Khojari Amandi Ghori Fateh Ahmad Jafar Sadat Khel Wala Khel Khan Qusar Men … Women … Children … Rest of TDPs Targeted TDPs in 9 UCs
5 Contingent upon funding and continued access to the UCs in District Bannu. 6 Amandi, Bazar Ahmad Khan, Bharat, Fatma Khel, Ghoriwala, Kausar, Kanjuri, Fateh Khel, Koti Sadat and Nar Jaffar.
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 4|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Winterization Situation Managing with the Uncatered . When asked about preparations for the upcoming Winterization Needs
winter, 70% of the TDPs responded that they had not 80% 63% made any preparations, 14% were relying on
winterization assistance from the government, UN 40% and/or NGOs, 8% purchased items from the junk 17% 6% 6% 6% 2%
market while the remaining 8% were seeking 0%
assistance from the host community and/or relatives.
. In terms of coping strategies, 63% intended to go Rely on Loans Loans on Rely
through the winter with their current means, 17% were Market
hoping for winterization assistance from the Relatives
and NGO assistance NGO and
without any Solution any without Waiting for Government Government for Waiting
government, UN and/or NGOs, 12% intended to seek the Junk from Purchases
Bearing the Harsh Weather the Harsh Bearing Host Community Assistance Community Host assistance from the host community and/or relatives, the from Assistance Seeking 6% would purchase on a need basis from the junk market and 2% expected to rely on savings or loans. Winter Assistance Been Provided
. Only 18% had received some kind of winterization 100% 82% assistance at the time of assessment (mainly from 80%
UNHCR), while 82% had not received any 60% assistance whatsoever to cope with the upcoming 40% winter. 18% 20%
Needs 0% Yes No . Of the respondents who reported to have received some kind of winterization assistance (18%), all of them (100%) highlighted that the winterization Most Needed Winterization Items assistance received was insufficient to cater for the needs of their whole family for the upcoming winter. 30% 27% 24% 20% 20% . The most needed winterization items were blankets 16% (27%), suitable/warm clothing and shoes (24%), 13% beds (20%), fuel (16%) and heaters (13%). 10%
. 87% considered the state of their current dwelling as 0% Sufficient Blankets Sufficient Fuel Heater inadequate for the coming winter, whereas 13% Beds clothing/shoes thought it was adequate.
UNHCR plans to distribute Winterization Kits for 70,000 TDP families from NWA. Each kit contains two blankets and three quilts.The distribution of the winterized kits started from 13th November and is still ongoing (as of 7th of December 2014).
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 5|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Shelter Situation in place of displacement
. The majority of the TDPs interviewed were living in Shelter Type in Place of Displacement rented houses (63%). The second most common 80% type of dwelling was accommodation provided free 63% 60% of charge by village committees or maliks (27%), while the remaining TDPs were staying with friends 40% 27% and relatives (4%), in school buildings (3%) or in 20% tents (3%). In the previous rapid needs assessment 4% 3% 3% 7
carried out by DRC , the number of TDPs staying in 0%
schools was significantly higher (11%). However,
Tent
House School
schools have opened in the meantime making this Rented
atives Friends/rel option less feasible for most TDPs. house Free
. In 74% of the cases 1-3 families were living together, while 22% reported 4-6 families and the rest (4%) were living with 7 or more families.
. 34% reported to be living together with 1-10 individuals under one roof, 35% with 11-20 individuals, 20% with 21-30 individuals and 11% stated that they were currently living together with more than 31 individuals.
. In terms of spaciousness, the vast majority (71%) was living in accommodations with 1-2 rooms followed by a considerable number of TDPs (22%) staying in places with 3-4 rooms. 4% were living in accommodations with 5-6 rooms while the rest (3%) reported 7 rooms or more. The graph below shows how many TDPs were living in the different sized dwellings in terms of number of rooms:
. Overcrowding (56%), harsh weather (22%), high cost of rent (8%), lack of privacy (6%) and latrines (6%) were highlighted as the key main concerns of the displaced population, while the remaining 2% mentioned either security, WASH or inappropriate infrastructure.
Comparison of Number Of Individuals Living In Different Size Dwelling 30% 30% 27%
.20% On a rating scale, only 5% reported their current dwelling conditions as “good”, while 20% categorized it as 13% “average” and the vast majority (71%) reported “poor” or “very poor”. 4% did not answer the question. 6% 10% 4% 6% 6% 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% . 0%90 out of the 143 interviewed TDPs (63%) were paying rent for their accommodation. 45 of the rent-paying TDPs (50%)1-2 rooms were paying a 3monthly-4 rooms rent below 54-,6000 rooms PKR, 38 TDPs7-8 (42%) rooms were payingMore than between 9 rooms 4 ,100 and 8,000 PKR and1=1 -710 (8%) individuals were paying2=11 more-20 individuals than 8 ,000 3=21PKR-30 a individualsmonth in rent4=More. than 31
. Only 13% reported to have received shelter assistance (mainly provided by UNHCR) while 87% of TDPs declared that no shelter assistance had been received.
7 DRC Pakistan: “Bannu Rapid Needs Assessment – Summary of Findings”, September 2014.
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 6|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Situation in place of origin . 98% of the respondents reported that they had been living in houses they owned in place of origin, while 2% had been Shelter Type in Place of Origin (In Sense of Ownership) living in either rented housing or free accommodation.
. In terms of construction material used in place of origin, 35% 120% 98% reported that they had been living in mud houses, 31% in 100% fully cemented/concrete-made buildings, 28% in brick houses 80% and 6% had been living in mixed mud-and-cement houses. 60%
Needs 40% . More space (56%), more winter compatible shelter (22%), 20% lower cost of rent (8%), improved privacy (6%), more 1% 1% household latrines (6%) and various other issues (2%) were 0% Rented House Own House Free House highlighted as the most important shelter-related needs of the displaced population.
. 78% did not know the present condition of their shelter in place of origin, while 22% reported to know the current state. Of this latter group, 72% reported that their shelter in place of origin had been destroyed, 6% said it was intact or only partially damaged while the rest (22%) did not elaborate further.
. Adequate and culturally sensitive temporary shelter arrangements such as emergency shelters are among the key concerns of the TDPs.
According to an update from the Community Restoration (CoRe) cluster (upon request from partners), shelter / housing will not be part of the Return and Rehabiliation Strategy (RRS) for FATA because the Government of Pakistan already has plans regarding rehabilitation within this sector.
The Government of Pakistan under Phase-II of Esaar-e-Pakhtunkhwa program launched on 24th Nov 2014 is providing amounts of Rs.6000/- to each verified TDP. As of 4th of December 2014, 24,629 transactions had been completed in Bannu totalling an amount of Rs. 155,370,500/-
The Multi-sector Initial Rapid Assessment (MIRA), July 2014: Main shelter concerns identified were overcrowding (35%), security (12%) and lack of privacy (12%). The critical issue for immediate response was that 32% had occupied government installations, mainly schools (24%), 3% were living in tents, 2% had made makeshift shelter, 2% had no shelters, and the rest were using other options. The majority were living without rental charges amongst host communities (55%).
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 7|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Livelihoods Situation in place of displacement . Among the interviewed TDPs, the average monthly Monthly Expenditure & Income family income in place of displacement was 18,792 PKR, in place of Displacement vs. Origin while the average monthly expenditures amounted to 60,000 54,243 27,291 PKR. 50,000 40,174 40,000 . Main sources of income in place of displacement were 27,291 from savings (17%), loans (15%), remittances (15%), 30,000 18,792 services (12%), government support (10%), unskilled 20,000
wage labor (10%), support received from 10,000 friends/relatives (5%), skilled wage labor (3%), 0 agriculture/livestock (2%), small businesses (2%) and In Place of Origin In Place of Displacement
other sources of income (2%). 7% reported that they did Average Expenditure Average Income not have any source of income.
. 79% stated that their present income was insufficient to cover even the most basic needs in place of displacement. Comparison of Main Sources of Income in Place of Displacement and Origin
In place of displacemet In place of origin
35% 31% 30%
25%
20% 16% 18% 19% 16% 16% 15% 15% 12% 11% 10% 11% 10% 7% 5% 5% 5% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
. When asked how income gaps were covered, 69% answered through loans, 19% by drawing on savings, 3% with help from charity combined with loans, 3% from financial support by the government, 3% by selling belongings, 2% through a combination of loans and savings and 1% with host community help.
. 55% reported that someone in their household possessed specialized skills: Of the males with skills, 33% had skills in driving, 20% in tailoring, 15% as electricians, 7% as auto mechanics, 7% as painters, 4% in masonry, 4% as health technicians/workers, and 2% in each of the following trades: livestock, watch-making, welding, IT, and plumbing. Of the females with specialized skills, 99% reported tailoring and 1% hand embroidery.
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 8|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
. 85% of the interviewed TDPs with skills reported that they were not currently utilizing their skills, 10% said that they to some extent were utilizing their skills while only 5% were fully utilizing their skills in place of displacement.
. 71% of the persons with skills highlighted that they in place of displacement did not have the required equipment and/or tools to make use of their skills.
. The main obstacles preventing TDPs from obtaining or improving their livelihood in place of displacement were lack of finance (41%), lack of required equipments/tools (26%), lack of skills (14%), poor market linkages (13%) and other reasons (2%).
. Only 11% had received some kind of livelihood assistance (in all instances provided by the government), while 89% had not received any kind of livelihood assistance. Of the 11% who had received some kind of assistance, 88% stated that it was not sufficient.
Situation in place of origin
. Among the interviewed TDPs, the average monthly family income in place of origin was 54,243 PKR, while the average monthly expenditures amounted to 40,174 PKR.
. Main sources of income in place of origin were from own businesses (31%), agriculture/livestock (18%), remittances (16%), services (15%), skilled wage labor (11%), unskilled wage labor (5%) and other sources of income (4%).
. 92% stated that their level of income prior to displacement was sufficient to cover the most basic needs, while only 8% stated that their income was insufficient to cover their most basic needs in place of origin.
. When asked about plans for ensuring an income after return to place of origin, 70% responded that they expected to continue with their previous source of income, 24% did not know and 6% intended to look for other sources.
. The main expected obstacles that might prevent TDPs from obtaining or improving their livelihood after return to place of origin are lack of finance (57%), lack of required equipments/tools (29%), lack of skills (7%), volatile security situation (3%), poor market linkages (2%) and other reasons (1%).
Needs
. According to the interviewed TDPs, the most important needs in terms of improving their livelihood conditions were financial support (34%), provision of required equipment/tools (25%), skill development trainings (17%), facilitation of job opportunities/placements (12%), small business assistance (3%), access to markets (2%) and various other reasons (7%).
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 9|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
According to an update from the Community Restoration (CoRe) cluster (upon request from partners), the Return & Rehabilitation Strategy (RSS) is likely to include a number of livelihood components, which will focus on rehabilitation of services, health, education, roads, irrigation and more. The RRS might also include livelihood opportunities in the shape of Cash-for-Work type of activities.
The Multi-sector Initial Rapid Assessment (MIRA, July 2014): As a result of the disruption of livelihoods, lack of income earning opportunities, and unavailability of required inputs, the displaced families were compelled to sell their livestock despite being a highly valuable productive asset. The findings indicated 18% of the livestock was sold after the displacement at lower than average market prices; on average, 46% reduction in prices was reported by the key informants.
Most Pressing Needs/Concerns
As a final question in each of the 143 individual interviews/questionnaires, the interviewed TDPs were asked in an open-ended manner about their most pressing needs or concerns in their current displacement situation. 35% stressed overcrowding and lack of privacy in current accommodation, 24% mentioned the harsh weather conditions, 13% highlighted lack of water and sanitation, 7% lack of money, 7% substandard shelter quality, 7% lack of income generating opportunities, 3% lack of access to services, 1% high costs of goods/services/rent and 3% mentioned various other needs and concerns.
Most Pressing Needs/Concerns of TDPs in District Bannu
40% 35% 35%
30%
25% 24%
20%
15% 13%
10% 7% 7% 7% 5% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0%
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 10|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Annexes Annex I.a TDPs breakdown in District Bannu (Union Councils) Men Women Children # Union Council Individuals Families (26%) (29%) (45%) 1 Slam Sikandar Khel 4243 407 1103 1230 1909 2 Sani1 4642 445 1207 1346 2089 3 Anzal 5803 556 1509 1683 2611 4 Hawad Landi Dak 6082 583 1581 1764 2737 5 Mandan 6314 605 1642 1831 2842 6 Fateh Khel Qusar 6805 652 1769 1974 3062 7 Hassani 7047 676 1832 2043 3171 8 Mama Khel 8280 794 2153 2401 3726 9 Sikander Khel Bala 8373 803 2177 2428 3768 10 Ghori Wala 8742 838 2273 2535 3934 11 Nizam Darma Khel 9119 874 2371 2645 4104 12 Kaki – 2 9144 877 2377 2652 4115 13 Amandi 10197 978 2651 2957 4589 14 Khawjamad 10727 1029 2789 3111 4827 15 Mandare 11012 1056 2863 3194 4956 16 Ismail Khel 11040 1058 2870 3202 4968 17 Jani Khel Mustaraka 11433 1096 2973 3315 5145 18 Khojari 11523 1105 2996 3342 5185 19 Norar 11575 1110 3010 3357 5209 20 Mamand Khel Wazir 12316 1181 3202 3572 5542 21 Fatima Khel 12684 1216 3298 3678 5708 22 Sparka Wazir 12826 1230 3335 3720 5772 23 Barat 14010 1343 3643 4063 6305 24 Khandar Khan Khel 14764 1415 3839 4281 6644 25 Jandi Khel 14856 1424 3862 4308 6685 26 Ziraki Pirba Khel 15023 1440 3906 4357 6760 27 Miti Khel 15834 1518 4117 4592 7125 28 Shabaz Azmat Khel 16774 1608 4361 4864 7548 29 Aral 2 17658 1693 4591 5121 7946 30 Arat 1 18203 1745 4733 5279 8191 31 Kot Kalandar 18663 1789 4852 5412 8398 32 Kala Khel Masti Khan 18828 1805 4895 5460 8473 33 Lalo Zai 19399 1860 5044 5626 8729 34 Kaki – 1 19813 1900 5151 5746 8916 35 Mira Khel 20408 1957 5306 5918 9184 36 Koti Sadat 20476 1963 5324 5938 9214 37 Takhti Khel 24953 2392 6488 7236 11229 38 Nar Jafar 27616 2648 7180 8009 12427 39 Havid Landidak 28547 2737 7422 8279 12846 40 Baka Khel 29001 2781 7540 8410 13050 41 Hindi Khel 29572 2835 7689 8576 13307 42 Mambati Barakzai 29992 2876 7798 8698 13497 43 Dawood Shah 30090 2885 7823 8726 13541 44 Shamshi Khel 31088 2981 8083 9015 13989 45 Mamash Khel 33243 3187 8643 9640 14959 46 Sokari Zabta Khan 34238 3283 8902 9929 15407 47 Bazar Ahmad Khan 35730 3426 9290 10362 16078 48 Bizan Khel 50294 4822 13076 14585 22632 Total 829,000 79,482 215,540 240,410 373,050
Source: UC Statistics in %age provided by District Disaster Management Authority Office, Bannu.
Total TDPs in Bannu: 829,000 (PDMA – MIS)
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 11|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected] DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Annex I.b TDPs breakdown in District Bannu (Union Councils) 56000 52000 48000
44000
40000 36000 32000
28000
24000
20000
16000
12000
8000
4000
Ghori Wala Ghori
Mamand Khel Wazir KhelMamand
Amandi
Sparka Wazir Sparka
Mira KhelMira Aral2 Khel AzmatShabaz Khel Jandi Dak LandiHawad Khel Slam Sikandar
BizanKhel Khel Mamash MamaKhel Hassani
Sokari Zabta Khan Zabta Sokari Sadat Koti Barat FatimaKhel Khel Ismail khawjamad Sani1
NarJafar Takhti Khel Kaki ZaiLalo Khan Masti Kala Khel Arat 1 MitiKhel Norar Khojari Kaki Khel NizamDarma
Bazar Ahmad Khan Ahmad Bazar Khel Shamshi HindiKhel Baka Khel HavidLandidak Khel Pirba Ziraki Khel Khan Khandar Bala Khel Sikander Anzal
Dawood ShahDawood
Mambati BarakzaiMambati Mandan Kot Kot Kalandar
Fateh Khel QusarFatehKhel 0 Mandare
MustarakaJaniKhel
- -
1 2
Men Women Children (26%) (29%) (45%)
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 12| 14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected]
DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL Annex II - Comparison of TDPs & host population in District Bannu
Host # Union Council TDPs Population
1 Slam Sikandar Khel 4243 15203 Slam Sikandar Khel 2 Sani I 4642 - Sani I 3 Anzal 5803 - Anzal 4 Mandan 6314 18427 Mandan 5 Fateh Khel Qusar 6805 15339 Fateh Khel Qusar 6 Hassani 7047 16822 Hassani 7 Mama Khel 8280 17054 Mama Khel 8 Sikander Khel Bala 8373 15692 Sikander Khel Bala 9 Ghori Wala 8742 20596 Ghori Wala 10 Nizam Darma Khel 9119 16743 11 Kaki - 2 9144 14169 Nizam Darma Khel 12 Amandi 10197 18164 Kaki - 2
13 khawjamad 10727 14462 Amandi Thousands 14 Mandare 11012 14522 khawjamad 15 Ismail Khel 11040 15021 Mandare 16 Jani Khel Mustaraka 11433 17827 Ismail Khel 17 Khojari 11523 15238 Jani Khel Mustaraka 18 Norar 11575 17176 Khojari 19 Mamand Khel Wazir 12316 19268 Norar 20 Fatima Khel 12684 26198 Mamand Khel Wazir 21 Sparka Wazir 12826 - Fatima Khel 22 Barat 14010 25422 Sparka Wazir 23 Khandar Khan Khel 14764 26143 Barat 24 Jandi Khel 14856 15936 Khandar Khan Khel 25 Ziraki Pirba Khel 15023 22564 26 Miti Khel 15834 20148 Jandi Khel 27 Shabaz Azmat Khel 16774 15430 Ziraki Pirba Khel 28 Aral 2 17658 - Miti Khel 29 Arat 1 18203 23910 Shabaz Azmat Khel 30 Kot Kalandar 18663 21517 Aral 2 31 Kala Khel Masti Khan 18828 23761 Arat 1 32 Lalo Zai 19399 23257 Kot Kalandar 33 Kaki - 1 19813 24631 Kala Khel Masti Khan 34 Mira Khel 20408 18500 Lalo Zai 35 Koti Sadat 20476 16580 Kaki - 1 36 Takhti Khel 24953 22801 Mira Khel 37 Nar Jafar 27616 22817 Koti Sadat 38 Baka Khel 29001 18274 Takhti Khel 39 Hindi Khel 29572 19951 Nar Jafar 40 Mambati Barakzai 29992 17986 41 Dawood Shah 30090 19434 Baka Khel 42 Shamshi Khel 31088 23506 Hindi Khel 43 Mamash Khel 33243 22134 Mambati Barakzai 44 Sokari Zabta Khan 34238 - Dawood Shah 45 Havid Landidak 34628 25969 Shamshi Khel 46 Bazar Ahmad Khan 35730 18382 Mamash Khel 47 Bizan Khel 50294 27903 Sokari Zabta Khan Havid Landidak Bazar Ahmad Khan Bizan Khel 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56
TDPs Host Population
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 13| 14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected]
DRC| DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL
Annex III Breakdown of TDPs in Nine Union Councils Accessible to DRC Fateh Khel Qusar, Ghori Wala, Amandi, Khojari, Fatma Khel, Barat, Koti Sadat, Nar Jaffar & Bazar Ahmad Khan Source: PDMA and District Government, Bannu
Families Men Women Children Union Council Individuals @10.43 (26%) (29%) (45%) Fateh Khel Qusar 6805 652 1769 1974 3062 Ghori Wala 8742 838 2273 2535 3934 Amandi 10197 978 2651 2957 4589 Khojari 11523 1105 2996 3342 5185 Fatima Khel 12684 1216 3298 3678 5708 Barat 14010 1343 3643 4063 6305 Koti Sadat 20476 1963 5324 5938 9214 Nar Jafar 27616 2648 7180 8009 12427 Bazar Ahmad Khan 35730 3426 9290 10362 16078 Total 147,783 14,169 38,424 42,857 66,502
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
Fateh Khel Qusar
Ghori Wala
Amandi
Khojari Fatima Khel
Barat
Koti Sadat
Nar Jafar
Bazar Ahmad Khan
Men Women Children (26%) (29%) (45%)
Source: PDMA Statistics
Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Danish Refugee Council, Pakistan 14|14 For further details please contact: [email protected] ; [email protected]
Danish Refugee Council
Railway Road 10-CII, University Town, Peshawar Tel: +92 (0) 91 570 1896 / [email protected]