DOCSLIB.ORG

San Diego County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan San Diego County, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Diego County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan San Diego County, California FINAL DRAFT SAN DIEGO COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 2010 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Plan Description/Purpose of Plan ..........................................................................1-1 1.2 Plan Purpose and Authority...................................................................................1-2 1.3 Community Description.........................................................................................1-3 1.3.1 The County of San Diego..........................................................................1-3 1.3.2 Local Jurisdictions ....................................................................................1-6 Section 2 Multi-Jurisdictional Participation Information...............................................2-1 2.1 List of Participating and Non-Participating Jurisdictions......................................2-1 2.2 Description of Each Jurisdiction’s Participation in the Planning Process .............2-1 Section 3 Planning Process Documentation ..................................................................3-1 3.1 Description of Planning Committee Formation.....................................................3-1 3.2 Name of Planning Committee and its Members....................................................3-1 3.3 Hazard Mitigation Working Group Meetings........................................................3-2 3.4 Planning Process Milestones .................................................................................3-3 3.5 Public Involvement................................................................................................3-4 3.6 Existing Plans or Studies Reviewed ......................................................................3-4 Section 4 Risk Assessment..............................................................................................4-1 4.1 Overview of the Risk Assessment Process............................................................4-1 4.1.1 Identifying Hazards...................................................................................4-1 4.1.2 Profiling Hazards ......................................................................................4-1 4.1.3 Identifying Assets .....................................................................................4-2 4.1.4 Assessing Vulnerability ............................................................................4-2 4.1.5 Repetitive Loss..........................................................................................4-2 4.1.6 Analyzing Development Trends ...............................................................4-3 4.2 Hazard Identification and Screening......................................................................4-3 4.2.1 List of Hazards Prevalent in the Jurisdiction ............................................4-3 4.2.2 Hazard Identification Process ...................................................................4-3 4.2.3 Hazard Identification Sources...................................................................4-6 4.2.4 Non-Profiled Hazards ...............................................................................4-6 4.3 Hazard Profiles ......................................................................................................4-8 4.3.1 Coastal Storms, Erosion and Tsunami ......................................................4-8 4.3.2 Dam Failure ............................................................................................4-19 4.3.3 Earthquake ..............................................................................................4-23 4.3.4 Flood .......................................................................................................4-29 4.3.5 Rain-Induced Landslide ..........................................................................4-35 4.3.6 Liquefaction ............................................................................................4-39 4.3.7 Structure/Wildfire Fire............................................................................4-43 4.3.8 Manmade Hazards...................................................................................4-49 4.4 Vulnerability Assessment ....................................................................................4-54 4.4.1 Asset Inventory .......................................................................................4-54 4.4.2 Estimating Potential Exposure and Losses, and Future Development Trends .....................................................................................................4-55 4.5 Multi-Jurisdictional Assessment........................................................................4-101 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.5.1 Analysis of Land Use............................................................................4-101 4.5.2 Analysis of Development Trends..........................................................4-105 Section 5 Goals, Objectives and Actions........................................................................5-1 5.1 Overview ...............................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Regional Considerations........................................................................................5-2 5.3 City of Carlsbad.....................................................................................................5-3 5.3.1 Capabilities Assessment............................................................................5-4 5.3.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions..................................................................5-7 5.4 City of Chula Vista ..............................................................................................5-15 5.4.1 Capabilities Assessment..........................................................................5-17 5.4.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions................................................................5-23 5.5 City of Coronado .................................................................................................5-41 5.5.1 Capabilities Assessment..........................................................................5-42 5.5.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions................................................................5-45 5.6 City of Del Mar....................................................................................................5-53 5.6.1 Capabilities Assessment..........................................................................5-54 5.6.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions................................................................5-57 5.7 City of El Cajon...................................................................................................5-65 5.7.1 Capabilities Assessment..........................................................................5-66 5.7.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions................................................................5-69 5.8 City of Encinitas ..................................................................................................5-79 5.8.1 Capabilities Assessment..........................................................................5-81 5.8.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions................................................................5-84 5.9 City of Escondido ..............................................................................................5-101 5.9.1 Capability Assessment ..........................................................................5-102 5.9.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions..............................................................5-107 5.10 City of Imperial Beach.......................................................................................5-121 5.10.1 Capabilities Assessment........................................................................5-122 5.10.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions..............................................................5-126 5.11 City of La Mesa .................................................................................................5-139 5.11.1 Capabilities Assessment........................................................................5-140 5.11.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions..............................................................5-143 5.12 City of Lemon Grove.........................................................................................5-151 5.12.1 Capabilities Assessment........................................................................5-152 5.12.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions..............................................................5-155 5.13 City of National City .........................................................................................5-161 5.13.1 Capabilities Assessment........................................................................5-162 5.13.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions..............................................................5-165 5.14 City of Oceanside............................................................................................5-177 5.14.1 Capabilities Assessment ...................................................................5-178 5.14.2 Goals, Objectives and Actions .........................................................5-182 5.15 City of Poway ....................................................................................................5-189
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report
    Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report Newland Sierra Specific Plan December 2015 (Revised - July 2016) Prepared for Vallecitos Water District This page is intentionally left blank. Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report Newland Sierra Specific Plan Contents 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Findings ............................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 5 4 Vallecitos Water District .................................................................................................................... 11 5 Historical and Projected Water Demands ......................................................................................... 13 5.1 Demand Management ............................................................................................................. 14 5.1.1 BMP Categories ......................................................................................................... 14 5.1.2 Senate Bill X 7-7 ......................................................................................................... 16 6 Existing and Projected Supplies .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cert Petition
    No. 18-____ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ Of Certiorari to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Jeffrey N. Boozell Kathleen M. Sullivan QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART Counsel of Record & SULLIVAN, LLP Stephanie N. Solomon 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART Los Angeles, CA & SULLIVAN, LLP (213) 443-3200 51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 (212) 849-7000 kathleensullivan@ quinnemanuel.com April 30, 2019 Counsel for Petitioner i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether it is an uncompensated taking for public use in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amend- ments for a State to impose strict liaBility for inverse condemnation on a privately owned utility without ensuring that the cost of that liaBility is spread to the Benefitted ratepayers. ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING The following were parties to the proceeding Be- fore the California court of appeal: 1. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (“SDG&E”), Peti- tioner in this Court, was Petitioner Below. 2. The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Respondent in this Court, was Respond- ent Below. 3. Protect Our Communities Foundation was a Real Party in Interest Below. 4. The Utility Reform Network was a Real Party in Interest Below. 5. Utility Consumers Action Network was a Real Party in Interest Below. 6. Ruth Hendricks was a Real Party in Interest Below. 7. San Diego Consumers’ Action Network was a Real Party in Interest Below.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #15940 (Rev
    ALJ/SPT/SL5/ek4 PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #15940 (Rev. 1) Ratesetting 11/30/20172017, Item #40 Decision PROPOSED DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES’ TSEN AND GOLDBERG (Mailed 8/22/17) BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902E) for Authorization to Application 15-09-010 Recover Costs Related to the 2007 Southern California Wildfires Recorded in the Wildfire Expense Memorandum Account (WEMA). DECISION DENYING APPLICATION 198906427197851767 - 1 - RA.15-09-010 ALJ/SPT/SL5/ek4 PROPOSED DECISION (Rev. 1) Table of Contents Title Page DECISION DENYING APPLICATION 1 PROPOSED DECISION DENYING APPLICATION 2 Summary 2 1. Factual Background 2 2. Procedural Background 3 3. Burden of Proof 8Legal Standards Applied9 4. Reasonableness Review: Prudent Manager Standard 9 5. Discussion and Analysis 911 5.1.4.1. Witch Fire 911 5.1.1.4.1.1. Witch Fire Background 911 5.1.2.4.1.2.SDG&E’s Position on its Operation and Management of its Facilities 4.1.3 ORA’s Position on SDG&E’s Operation and Management of its Facilities Prior to the Witch Fire 1321 5.1.3.4.1.4.Intervenors’ Position on SDG&E’s Operation and Management of its 5.1.4.4.1.5.Reasonableness Review: SDG&E’s Operation and Management of its 5.2.4.2. Guejito Fire 2729 5.2.1.4.2.1. Guejito Fire Background 27 5.2.2. SDG&E’s Position on its Operation and Management of its Facilities Prior to the Guejito Fire 29 5.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Fires in San Diego County History
    Major fires in San Diego County history September 1913: Barona fire burned 65,470 acres. September 1928: Witch Creek fire near Santa Ysabel charred 33,240 acres. September 1928: Beauty Peak fire near the Riverside County border in the North County blackened 67,000 acres. October 1943: Hauser Creek fire in the Cleveland National Forest, at least 9 firefighters dead (including 7 marines), 72 injuries and 10,000 acres burned. August 1944: Laguna Junction fire burned 60,000 acres August 1950: Conejos Fire charred 64,000 acres. [Month unknown] 1952: Cuyamaca fire burned 64,000 acres November 1956: Inaja fire killed 11 firefighters and burned 43,904 acres near Julian. September 26-Oct. 3 1970: The Laguna fire, the county's largest fire in modern times, burned 175,425 acres, killed eight people and destroyed 382 homes. In 24 hours the fire burned from near Mount Laguna into the outskirts of El Cajon and Spring Valley. September 1978: PSA Crash in North Park June 1985: Normal Heights fire destroyed or damaged 116 houses, causing $8.6 million in damage. October 1993: Guejito fire east of Escondido charred 20,000 acres and destroyed 18 houses. Estimated $1.25 million damage. October 1996: Harmony Grove fire burned 8,600 acres, from Harmony Grove west of Escondido to La Costa, destroying nearly 110 homes and killing one man. August 1997: Lake Wohlford fire northeast of Escondido - an arson blaze - destroyed seven houses and burned 500 acres. October 1999: La Jolla Fire (La Jolla Indian Reservation) burned approximately 7,800 acres and 1 firefighter died.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of San Diego, California
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS WR-270 CLIMATE OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Revised by: Emmanuel M. Isla Steve Vanderburg Christopher Medjber Daniel Paschall September 2004 First Edition: Thomas E. Evans, III, Donald A. Halvorson-October 1998 UNITED STATES National Oceanic and National Weather Service DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Atmospheric Administration David L. Johnson, Assistant Donald Evans, Secretary Conrad C.. Lautenbacher Administrator for Weather Services Under Secretary and Administrator This publication has been reviewed and is approved for publication by Scientific Services Division, Western Region Delain A. Edman, Chief Scientific Services Division Salt Lake City, Utah iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. Introduction........ ............. ............................ ............. ............. .............. ............. ............. ......... 1 II. The City of San Diego...... ............................ ............. ............. .............. ............. ............. ......... 2 III. History.. ............. ............. ............................ ............. ............. .............. ............. ............. ......... 3 IV. Temperatures...... ............. ............................ ............. ............. .............. ............. ............. ......... 4 V. Precipitation ....... ............. ............................ ............. ............. .............. ............. ............. ......... 8 VI. Wind..... ............. ............. ............................ ............. ............. .............
    [Show full text]
  • Thunderstorms in San Diego and Associated Easterly Wave of 20 July 1998
    WESTERN REGION TECHNICAL ATTACHMENT NO. 00-02 FEBRUARY 15, 2000 THUNDERSTORMS IN SAN DIEGO AND ASSOCIATED EASTERLY WAVE OF 20 JULY 1998 Brandt Maxwell {Note: The figures and tables will not be printed in hard copy, but can be accessed in the Web version of theTA.] Introduction An easterly wave moved west across New Mexico, Arizona and southern California from 18-20 July 1998. During the afternoon of 20 July 1998, when the easterly wave was near San Diego, CA, thunderstorms occurred in the coastal sections of San Diego County, including the city of San Diego. This is somewhat unusual, as summer thunderstorms have occurred at the coast in San Diego on average only about once every two years (Evans and Halvorson, 1998). The thunderstorms on 20 July 1998 were short-lived, not lasting more than one hour at any one location. However, the thunderstorms were strong enough to give San Diego Lindbergh Field 0.21 inches of precipitation, which was ten times the average rainfall for the entire month of July. This was the third largest daily precipitation amount ever recorded in July at the official observation location in San Diego. It was the largest daily precipitation value in July since 31 July 1991 , when 0.23 inches of precipitation occurred during an easterly wave. Not all easterly waves that move through southern California produce precipitation in San Diego. An easterly wave (which occurred on 11 July 1999) did not produce precipitation in coastal San Diego County, despite producing flooding in the San Bernardino County mountains and deserts. An examination of these waves wi ll show that there were two major differences between the 20 July 1998 and 11 July 1999 systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Field State Park, Who Shared an Incredible Amount of Knowledge and Inspiration with Me
    Client: California State Parks Faculty Advisor: Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris A comprehensive project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Urban and Regional Planning Disclaimer: This report was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master in Urban and Regional Planning degree in the Department of Urban Planning at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). It was prepared at the direction of the Department and of California State Parks as a planning client. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department, the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, UCLA as a whole, or the client. 2 Acknowledgments UCLA’s Luskin Center for Innovation provided partial support for this project through a Graduate Research Grant. California State Parks, which provided partial support for the research completed in this project. Anne Marie Tipton, Education Coordinator at Border Field State Park, who shared an incredible amount of knowledge and inspiration with me. Jenny Rigby, of The Acorn Group, who introduced me to this project and worked with me every step of the way, providing advice and guidance, pointed me to important sources of information, and gave thorough and thoughtful edits to this document. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, my faculty advisor for this project, was also my faculty advisor throughout my master’s program. I am so grateful for her advice, guidance, and support over the past two years. My family and friends who encouraged me along the way, and understood when I wasn’t around. And especially to my husband, Charles Thomas, who has been by my side, supporting me every step of the way, and our daughters, Egeria and Emma, who lovingly and patiently were there to cheer me on.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego History Center Is a Museum, Education Center, and Research Library Founded As the San Diego Historical Society in 1928
    The Journal of San Diego Volume 61 Winter 2015 Numbers 1 • The Journal of San Diego History Diego San of Journal 1 • The Numbers 2015 Winter 61 Volume History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego History Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The San Diego History Center is a museum, education center, and research library founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fund raising events; membership dues; admissions; shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Front Cover: Clockwise: Casa de Balboa—headquarters of the San Diego History Center in Balboa Park. Photo by Richard Benton. Back Cover: San Diego & Its Vicinity, 1915 inside advertisement. Courtesy of SDHC Research Archives. Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Editorial Assistants: Travis Degheri Cynthia van Stralen Joey Seymour The Journal of San Diego History IRIS H. W. ENGSTRAND MOLLY McCLAIN Editors THEODORE STRATHMAN DAVID MILLER Review Editors Published since 1955 by the SAN DIEGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1649 El Prado, Balboa Park, San Diego, California 92101 ISSN 0022-4383 The Journal of San Diego History VOLUME 61 WINTER 2015 NUMBER 1 Editorial Consultants Published quarterly by the San Diego History Center at 1649 El Prado, Balboa MATTHEW BOKOVOY Park, San Diego, California 92101.
    [Show full text]
  • WEATHER and CLIMATE Fall 2014
    GEOGRAPHY 103: WEATHER AND CLIMATE Fall 2014. MWF 10 am to 10:50 am in COM 205. (Schedule #21574) Credit: NOAA Photo Library, NOAA Central Library; Credit: NOAA GOES-12 visible imagery of Hurricane OAR/ERL/National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) Katrina; 8-29-2008 COURSE DESCRIPTION Why do U.S. winds and storms typically come from the west, yet hurricanes often arrive from the east across the Atlantic Ocean? Why is it that in the summer, we have relatively few thunderstorms in southern California, while they are almost an everyday occurrence during along the coast of Florida, and for that matter in Denver too? Why do we breathe harder and get bad sunburns when we head up to the mountains to hike or ski? Why does air pollution make our blue skies gray, but make sunsets far more colorful and gorgeous? Weather and Climate introduces students to basic principles of the atmosphere such as air pressure, winds and moisture that are responsible for our blue skies, gorgeous sunsets, thunderstorms, gentle trade winds, and thin mountain air. We move on to discuss severe weather, including the phenomenon of lightning, and the unpredictable and potentially devastating hurricanes and tornadoes. We examine how our planet and its population are affected by these weather systems and how we might be influencing our global weather and climate. This class offers General Education credit under “Natural Sciences and Quantitative Reasoning: Physical Sciences.” See SDSU General Catalog for more information. INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION Dr. Molly Costello Office: Storm Hall 311B (3rd floor) Phone: 619-594-8560 Email: [email protected] Office Hrs: MW 1-2:30 pm by apt.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Rainfall and Reservoirs
    Local Rainfall and Reservoirs San Diego County Reservoirs ORANGE COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY RED MOUNTAIN SAN DIEGO COUNTY RESERVOIR Fallbrook 76 DIVERSIFICATION MORRO HILL RESERVOIR Local Storage: LAKE HENSHAW Enhancing Water 15 TURNER LAKE A Vital Water Supply Reliability Vista Resource Oceanside 78 DIXON LAKE MAERKLE RESERVOIR LAKE WOHLFORD San Marcos SUTHERLAND Carlsbad San Diego Escondido RESERVOIR County’s semiarid OLIVENHAIN RESERVOIR climate means that SAN DIEGUITO Encinitas RESERVOIR 5 truly wet years are LAKE HODGES LAKE RAMONA few and far between, Solana Beach LAKE POWAY CUYAMACA and dry years are very 15 RESERVOIR Del Mar 56 Poway SAN VICENTE RESERVOIR common. Since 1976, the EL CAPITAN MIRAMAR RESERVOIR amount of local surface RESERVOIR 805 Santee water used to help meet La Jolla 52 LAKE JENNINGS annual demand has been as 67 high as 140,300 acre-feet LAKE MURRAY El Cajon 163 LOVELAND 8 RESERVOIR and as low as 4,071 acre- La Mesa feet. Consequently, runoff from 5 San Diego 94 SWEETWATER RESERVOIR BARRETT LAKE Lemon local rainwater that flows into Coronado Grove reservoirs – commonly National City MORENA 54 RESERVOIR called surface water – Chula Vista AF = acre-foot LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR represents a vital One acre-foot is but small portion of 905 approximately San Diego County’s Maerkle, Red Mountain and Morro Hill store 325,900 gallons, MEXICO treated water and do not capture local runoff. enough to supply water supply needs. 2.5 single-family Over the past 10 years, an Enhancing Water Storage households of four average of about 7 percent of the Today, the Water Authority and its mem- for a year.
    [Show full text]
  • U-M-08-Front 2.Indd
    The Tdayicket tripper Avenida Revolución’s A piece by Hugo Lugo Hard Rock Café. at the Tijuana Cultural Center. Taming TIJUTranscendA the sinfulN repA of San Diego’s sister city by checking out the mucha cultura awaiting just across the border The Cultural Center’s IMAX theatre. Los Panchos—home of Tijuana’s best tacos. Shopping at the Plaza Santa Cecilia. Once across, travel by taxi. Average fares are buy a song from a wandering Mariachi or Norteño For a more visceral kick, tear up your PETA about US$7, though establishing the price before band in Plaza Santa Cecilia, then continue on to the membership and follow the trail of red and green you get in the cab is vital. Speaking Spanish will (3) Mercado el Popo (on 2nd between Ave. Niños balloons to the roar and dust of a summer bull- help, but don’t worry if your language skills are Héroes and Ave. Constitutión) for regional cheeses, $ ght, where laughing children toss rosebuds to the rusty—a friendly smile and the name of your des- candies and more exotic items like fried grass- swooping matadors every Sunday a# ernoon from tination will su! ce. hoppers or a Santería love spell from Botánica. May to September at La Plaza de Toros Monu- " e classic tourist experience begins at Avenida But don’t limit yourself to shopping. De$ nitely mental, the “Bullring by the Sea” in Las Playas de TIJUANA IS SYNONYMOUS with wanton indulgence and all-night partying, and for Revolución, the main drag that stretches from the visit the (4) Tijuana Cultural Center (52-664- Tijuana (52-656-613-1656).
    [Show full text]