Synthesis Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Synthesis Report ASSESSMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL AIDS PROGRAMME FOR YEARS 2009-2013 IN UKRAINE SYNTHESIS REPORT September 2013 The State Service for HIV/AIDS and Other Socially Dangerous Diseases. Assessment of the State Program to Ensure HIV Prevention, Treatment, Care, and Support to HIV-positive People and Patients with AIDS for Years 2009-2013 (the National AIDS Programme) in Ukraine: Synthesis Report (English original, September 2013). This report may be freely reproduced or distributed with appropriate acknowledgement. This report contains the collective views of the Assessment Team of the National AIDS Programme (NAP) in Ukraine and does not necessarily represent the decisions or stated policies of the organizations that have provided support to the Assessment. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of any organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. All reasonable precautions have been taken to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the Assessment Team or other organizations or individuals that have been involved in the development of this report be liable for damages arising from its use. Assessment was conducted with the assistance of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS in Ukraine (UNAIDS in Ukraine) www.unaids.org.ua TABLE OF Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................... .................... 15 1.1 GOVERNANCE AND SUPPORT MECHANISMS .....................................................................................16 1.1.1 Legislation, rules and regulations ...............................................................................................16 1.1.2 Policies, strategies and plans .........................................................................................................16 1.1.3 NAP Organisation .............................................................................................................................17 1.1.4 Human resources ...............................................................................................................................17 1.1.5 Monitoring and evaluation ............................................................................................................18 1.1.6 Procurement supply management ...............................................................................................18 1.2 SERVICE COVERAGE, INTEGRATION AND QUALITY ..........................................................................18 1.2.1 Coverage, Outreach and Community level interventions ......................................................18 1.2.2 Penitentiary health care services ..................................................................................................19 1.2.3 Service integration and client focus ............................................................................................19 1.2.4 Quality of Service ..............................................................................................................................19 1.3 PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY .........................................................................................................................20 1.4 POLITICAL WILL AND HUMAN RIGHTS ..................................................................................................20 2 BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE .................................................................. .....................22 3 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................... .....................22 4 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. .....................23 4.1 COORDINATION.................................................................................................................................................23 4.2 THEMatiC AREAS .............................................................................................................................................23 4.3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................23 5 STATUS OF THE EPIDEMIC ............................................................................. .....................24 5.1 POPULATION ......................................................................................................................................................24 5.2 INJECTING DRUGS USERS ............................................................................................................................24 5.3 FEMALE SEX WORKERS ..................................................................................................................................24 5.4 MEN HAVING SEX WITH MEN .....................................................................................................................25 5.5 PRISONERS ..........................................................................................................................................................25 5.6 PMTCT ...................................................................................................................................................................25 5.7 Youth ...................................................................................................................................................................25 6 STENGTHS AND ACHIEVEMENTS ................................................................. .....................26 6.1 PREVENTION .......................................................................................................................................................26 6.2 INJECTING DRUGS USERS ............................................................................................................................26 6.3 FEMALE SEX WORKERS ..................................................................................................................................26 6.4 MEN HAVING SEX WITH MEN .....................................................................................................................27 6.5 PMTCT ...................................................................................................................................................................27 6.6 PRISONERS ..........................................................................................................................................................27 6.7 Youth ...................................................................................................................................................................27 6.8 TESTING AND COUNSELLING .....................................................................................................................28 6.9 ART AND OST SERVICES ...............................................................................................................................28 6.10 PROGRAM ORGANISATION........................................................................................................................28 6.11 FUNDING ...........................................................................................................................................................28 6.12 POLITICAL ATTENTION ................................................................................................................................29 6.13 HUMAN RIGHTS ..............................................................................................................................................29 7 CRITICAL BARRIERS (bOTTLENECKS) .......................................................... .....................30 7.1 WEAK LEADERSHIP AND PROFOUND SOCIETAL STIGMA, DISCRIMINATION AND INEQUALITY ................................................................................................................30 7.1.1 No engaged leadership means no effective programme ......................................................30 7.1.2 High level of stigma, discrimination and inequality persists ...............................................30 7.2 WEAK GOVERNANCE & SUPPORT MECHANISMS ..............................................................................31 7.2.1 Legislation, rules and regulations hinder implementation ...................................................31 7.2.2 Insufficient Organisation and Management .............................................................................31 7.2.3 HR development capacity hampers implementation .............................................................32 7.2.4 M&E system not adequate, data use is moderate ...................................................................32 7.2.5 PSM is inadequate and causes disrupted supply that hinders service intensity, quality and coverage ..................................................................................................................................32 7.3 PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY
Recommended publications
  • About the International Renaissance Foundation
    2006 About the International Renaissance Foundation An open society is a society based on the recognition of the fact that no one has a monopoly on the truth, that diff erent people have diff erent views and interests, that good arguments should be heard by society and that there is a need for institutions open to striving toward perfection, defending the rights of all peo- ple and giving them a chance to live together in peace and accord. Th e term “open society” was introduced by the philosopher Karl Popper in his book “Th e Open Society and Its Enemies” published in 1945. Th e main traits of an open society include the rule of law, a democratically elected government, institutions of civil society and protection of minority rights. Th e International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) has been active since 1990. It is an integral part of the Open Society In- stitute foundation network established by George Soros and incorporates national and regional foundations in more than thirty countries around the world, primarily in Central and Eastern Europe and in the former Soviet Union. Th e Founda- tion sees its mission in the fi nancial and institutional promotion of the building of an open democratic society in Ukraine by supporting civil initiatives vital for its development. Th e funds operated by IRF are mainly granted by its founder George Soros. Th e Foundation also relies on international donors and various Ukrainian and foreign organizations and individuals. Both the transparency of the Foundation’s spon- sorship and charitable activities and an understanding of its importance contribute to funds granted by IRF for building an open, democratic society being distributed by the society’s members represented in IRF’s Executive Board and Program Boards themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Ecological and Social Challenges for Forests and Forest Management” Kyiv, October 22-24, 2018 Book of Abstracts
    Proceedings International scientific and practical conference “Addressing Ecological and Social Challenges for Forests and Forest Management” Kyiv, October 22-24, 2018 Book of Abstracts Book of Abstracts Book of Abstracts Proceedings of International scientific and practical conference “Addressing Ecological and Social Challenges for Forests and Forest Management” October 22-24, 2018, Kyiv, Ukraine Encouraged to publish by Scientific and Technical Council of Research Institute of Forestry and Landscape Gardening of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (protocol № 16 October 10, 2018) Editing: prof. Lakyda P.I. prof. Bilous A.M. prof. Vasylyshyn R.D. prof. Zibtsev S.V. UDC 630*6:502:316 © 2018 by NULES of Ukraine All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher, except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. 2 Book of Abstracts РЕЗОЛЮЦІЯ міжнародної науково-практичної конференції «Екологічні та соціальні виклики лісам і лісовому менеджменту та їх подолання» 23 жовтня 2018 року, м. Київ Міжнародна науково-практична конференція «Екологічні та соціальні виклики лісам і лісовому менеджменту та їх подолання», що відбулася у м. Києві, організована Національним університетом біоресурсів і природокористування України, Національним представництвом FSC в Україні, Державним агентством лісових ресурсів України, Національним лісотехнічним університетом України, Товариством лісівників України за підтримки Німецько-українського агрополітичного діалогу, була присвячена актуальним питанням функціонування та розвитку лісової галузі України. Конференція передбачала проведення 1 пленарного, 2 секційних та заключного засідання. Було представлено 26 усних доповідей, присвячених оцінці стану лісів і лісового господарства, інституційним та економічним механізмам трансформації лісового господарства до адаптаційного лісового менеджменту.
    [Show full text]
  • Neonazis & Euromaidan
    Stanislav Byshok Alexey Kochetkov NEONAZIS & EUROMAIDAN From democracy to dictatorship [Second edition] 2014 Stanislav Byshok, Alexey Kochetkov NEONAZIS & EUROMAIDAN. From democracy to dictator- ship. [Second edi on]. “Whoever is not jumping is a Moskal” is a chant that women and men of diff erent ages who took to Kiev Independence Square in win- ter 2013-2014 repeated trying to get warm. They kept jumping and laughing, for nobody in the ‘brave new world’ of the Ukrainian revo- lu on under Stepan Bandera’s banner fancied gaining the character of a staunch enemy of Ukrainian statehood. Mass demonstra ons of “angry ci zens” in Ukraine had objec ve reasons. This was a protest against ineff ec ve and corrupt govern- ment, against police and bureaucra c abuse of power, against unclear and dead-end policies of the President and the Government. All na onal libera on movements use the popular ideas and po- li cal sen ments that dominate the society as their posi ve mani- festo. Thus, exclusively le -wing ideologies were mainstream in the Russian Empire in 1917, radical Islamism was most popular in Arab countries during the Arab spring of 2012, whereas na onalism, also radical, turned mainstream in the Ukraine of 2013-2014. The book describes the development of Ukraine’s na onal- ist groups since 1991 un l present day. It focuses on the history of the parliamentary right-wing radical Svoboda party and the non- parliamentary Right Sector movement. The authors study the ideol- ogy, psychology and methods of poli cal struggle of these structures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2019
    INSIDE: l Reaction to PACE vote on Russia – page 7 l Travel to Ukraine: If you love Lviv… – page 11 l Ukraine wins 51 medals at European Games – page 13 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association, Inc., celebrating W its 125th anniversaryEEKLY Vol. LXXXVII No. 28 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JULY 14, 2019 $2.00 Ukraine’s president Zelenskyy makes North American debut calls on Putin to meet at Ukraine Reform Conference in Toronto face-to-face for talks by Christopher Guly Special to The Ukrainian Weekly RFE/RL’s Ukrainian Service OTTAWA – A global summit organized to KYIV – Ukrainian President Volody- support Ukraine’s reform process was the myr Zelenskyy has called on Russian logical venue for Ukraine’s new president President Vladimir Putin to talk. to make his first overseas trip and North In a July 8 video statement on American debut with Ukrainian First Lady Facebook, Mr. Zelenskyy said he was Olena Zelenska. ready to hold talks with Mr. Putin in the Attending the third annual Ukraine Belarusian capital, Minsk. Reform Conference in Toronto – a gather- “We need to talk? We do. Let us dis- ing of more than 800 representatives of 37 cuss who Crimea belongs to and who is countries and 10 international organiza- not there in Donbas,” the Ukrainian tions – along with receiving a red-carpet president said, adding that he wanted welcome, signing bilateral agreements and the leaders of the United States, obtaining further funding from the Germany, France and the United Canadian government made Volodymyr Kingdom present at the talks. Zelenskyy’s decision to interrupt his cam- Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian-Jewish
    INSIDE: • Analyses of Ukraine’s presidential election – pages 2, 3 and 4. • Canadian Bandurist Capella has ambitious season – page 13. • Community chronicle: Illinois, Minnesota, Pennsylvania – page 17. THEPublished U by theKRA Ukrainian NationalIN AssociationIAN Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No.5 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 31, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine Yushchenko honors Bandera As runoff nears, election battles erupt with Hero of Ukraine title between Tymoshenko,Yanukovych forces “What was hoped for for decades has finally happened,” Mr. Bandera said after accept- ing the award. “The Ukrainian state has recognized the heroic deeds of Stepan Bandera and the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian patriots who died for this country. This order is a brave act towards historical justice which affirms the truth and a new era of a Ukraine that we dream of.” As the end of his presiden- tial term approached, ethni- cally conscious Ukrainians pleaded with the president to bestow the honor upon Bandera, recognizing the Offi cial Website of Ukraine’s President nation won’t likely have a president in the next five to 10 President Viktor Yushchenko presents the Hero of Dmytro Korabliov/UNIAN Ukraine order to Stepan Bandera, grandson of the years with the political will to Police on January 25 confront national deputies from the Party of Regions who nationalist leader Stepan Bandera. take the controversial step. Deputies of the Ternopil were guarding the Ukrayina Polygraphic Plant, where election ballots are printed. City Council, as well as the Lviv and Ivano- by Zenon Zawada by Zenon Zawada key appellate court to search its comput- Frankivsk oblast councils, made such Kyiv Press Bureau ers the next day.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREIGN POLICY of UKRAINE 2009/2010 STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS, FORECASTS and PRIORITIES Annual Strategic Review
    Yearbook_2010_Engl.qxd 04.11.2011 14:23 Page 1 FOREIGN POLICY OF UKRAINE 2009/2010 STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS, FORECASTS AND PRIORITIES Annual Strategic Review Edited by Professor G. M. Perepelytsia Kyiv Stylos Publishing House 2011 Yearbook_2010_Engl.qxd 04.11.2011 14:23 Page 2 Assessments presented in this Annual Strategic Review are those of the authors and reflect exclusively authors’ opinion on the events of international life and foreign policy of Ukraine Foreign policy of Ukraine – 2009/2010: Strategic Assessments, Forecasts and Priorities / Edited by G. M. Perepelytsia. – Кyiv: Stylos Publishing House, 2009. – 320 p. ISBN 9789661930703 The Annual Strategic Review of the Foreign Policy Research Institute does not represent the official position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine (MFAU). The goal of this publication is to provide comprehensive analysis of Ukraine’s foreign policy, describe key trends inherent to Ukrainian foreign poli cy over the last year and forecast options for their further development, as well as spell out the priority areas for the implementation of the foreignpolicy course of Ukraine. This Annual Strategic Review is aimed at encouraging politicians and the scientific community of Ukraine to engage into discussion and seek the ways to resolve foreign policy problems and refine foreignpolicy course of Ukraine The Annual Strategic Review is intended for a wide range of Ukrainian and foreign experts, scientists, Ukrainian diplomats and Embassies, as well as foreign diplomatic missions and representative offices in Ukraine and readers interested in foreign policy issues and international relations. © Foreing Policy Research Institute, 2011 © Stylos Publishing House, 2011 ISBN 9789661930703 Yearbook_2010_Engl.qxd 04.11.2011 14:23 Page 3 Table of contents Preface....................................................................5 G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2010, No.20
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • Update on the case of John Demjanjuk – page 4. • Myroslav Marynovych speaks on religious freedom – page 9. • D.C. Flower Mart festival focuses on Ukraine – page 12. THEPublished U by theKRA Ukrainian NationalIN AssociationIAN Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No.20 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MAY 16, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine UNA introduces new logo Ukraine in danger: Authoritarianism seen as returning under Yanukovych by Zenon Zawada Kyiv Press Bureau Ukraine’s civil society has begun to report on authoritarian policies and human rights abuses by the administration of President Viktor Yanukovych and the government led by Prime Minister Mykola Azarov, which was formed on March 11 with the appoint- ment of the Cabinet of Ministers. This is the first part in a series of articles examining the abuses of power already being observed. The Ukrainian National Association’s new logo, which includes updated ele- ments of its previous logo. KYIV – The administration of President Viktor Yanukovych has begun to repress PARSIPPANY, N.J. – As the 37th feel. This revised logo will appear on all Ukraine’s opposition, mass media and civic Regular Convention of the Ukrainian future UNA communications, represent- institutions, threatening Ukraine’s fragile National Association (UNA) approaches, ing a company that is ready for whatever democracy and allowing for authoritarianism what better time to review past accom- the future may bring. to return to Ukrainian society, say members plishments and set a course for the In addition to a fresh look for the UNA of the opposition and the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2020
    INSIDE: l Ramifications of critical water shortage in Crimea – page 3 l Interview: Ambassador Valeriy Chaly – page 9 l Online exhibit: Internment of Ukrainians during WWI – page 15 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXXVIII No. 22 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MAY 31, 2020 $2.00 UCCA postpones XXIII Congress Ukraine enters second stage of Ukrainians in America to 2021 of quarantine easing UCCA The decision to schedule a UCCA con- vention outside of a U.S. presidential elec- NEW YORK – The Ukrainian Congress tion year was made due to the conditions Committee of America (UCCA), the repre- affecting the United States as result of the sentative organization of nearly 2 million global pandemic of COVID-19. As the health Americans of Ukrainian descent, on May 14 and well-being of the Ukrainian American convened an extraordinary session of community is, and should always be, a pri- UCCA’s National Council, UCCA’s highest ority for the leadership of that community, ruling body. The purpose of the meeting, and whereas individual states, including held over the Zoom video and audio confer- the state of New York (where the XXIII encing platform for the first time, was to Congress is to be convened), have closed discuss the planned XXIII Congress of most if not all businesses, schools and pub- Ukrainians in America, UCCA’s quadrennial lic facilities, the UCCA’s National Council convention. Scheduled to coincide with U.S. decided that the XXIII Congress will not presidential election years, the XXIII convene in 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Context of Hybrid War
    UDC 327:355.1(1-071)(477) JEL code Z 18 No part of the book may be copied or reproduced without citing the source In this multi-authored monograph the scholars of the National Institute for Strategic Studies of Ukraine present an unprecedented study of the phenomenon of the world hybrid war, which manifested itself in the Russian aggression against Ukraine. The nature of the hybrid war was analyzed in the context of the global security crisis and was studied as a new type of global confrontation. This monograph is a complex analysis of the causes and preconditions of the Russian aggression against Ukraine with respect to the strategic purposes and special aspects of conduct in various dimensions including military, political, economic, social, humanitarian, and informational. This monograph also presents research of the local success of our country in resisting the hostile plans of the Russian Federation in certain areas. The conclusion reached by this study is that Ukraine is capable of fighting against an aggressor for her sovereignty. The reformation of international security institutions and attainment of balance of power in the new hybrid reality are also addressed in the monograph. This book is meant for politicians, political analysts, senior government officials and scientists in the field of security studies. The research results would also be interesting for academia, representatives of civil society, as well as patriotic and responsible citizens. Ukrainian institute for the future is independent think tank founded in 2016 which works on reports, forecasts and analytics on key issues of Ukrainian development. UIF mission is designing of a successful future for Ukraine, through expert studies and discussions that will promote and contribute the adoption of high-quality political decisions both in Ukrainian and international politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Vnutro Ev6 2018.Indd
    ×æï®æ ǡ ǯ ǡ ǤǤ ǤǤ Ǥ ǤǤ Ǥǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǤǤǤ ǤǤǡ, Ǥ ǤǦ Ǥ ǦǣǤ̷Ǥ EURÓPSKA VEDA ƥ ×æï®æ ý« «Ǥ͙͔͜Ȁ͖͜ 941 48 Podhájska ǣΪ͖͕͔͙͙͔͚͙͛͘͘͝ ,ǣ͖͔͗͗͗͘͘͝ EUROPEAN SCIENCE ,ǣ͖͔͖͚͕͖͗͛͜͝ Ƥ , ǡǤǤ «ǤǤe͕͝ ͔͔͕͘͝± ǣ͔͖͖͕͔͔͙͛͘͜Ȁ͙͔͔͛ ǣ͙͔͔͔͔͔͔͔͔͔͖͖͕͔͔͙͗͛͛͘͘͜ ǣ ͙͔Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ 6/2018 Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ «À͖ Ǥ ͖ Ǩ ̹×æï®æǡ ǡ 2018 Podhájska 2018 ͖͙͙͜Ǧ͛͛͗͜ ǣ͙͚͕͝Ȁ͕͜ Journal of the National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine European Science ǣ ǯ ǡǤǤ ǤǤ Ǥ ǤǤǤǡ Ǥǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǤǡ Ǥǡǡ ǣ ǡǤǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǤǡǤǤ ǤǤǡ ǡǡ ǣ ǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǤ Ǥǡ ǤǤǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ƥ ǣ æǡǡǡ ǡ ǤǤǡ Ȃ ǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ ơǡ ǤǡǤ ǤǤ Ǥǡǡ ǡ ǤǡǤǡ ǡ ǤǤ Ǥǡ ǡ ǡ æ ǤǡǤ Ǥ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ ǡ ǤǡǤǡ ǡ Ǽ ǽ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ æ Ǥǡ ǤǡǤǤ Ǥ ǤǡǡǤǤ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡǡǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ ǤǡǤǡ ǡǡ Ǥǡǡǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡǡ ǤǡǤǡǤǤ Ǥǡǡǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡǡ Ǥǡ ǤǡǤ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡ ǤǡǤǤ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡǡ Ǥǡ ǡǡ Ǥ Ǥǡǡ ǤǤǡ Ȃ ǡ ǤǤǤǡ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǡǤǤǡǤ Ǥǡǡ ǡǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ƥ Ǥǡ Ǥǡǡǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡ ǤǡǤǤ ǤǡǤǤ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡǡ ǤǡǤǤǤ Ǥǡǡǡ ǤǤǡǤǡǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǡ ǤǤ Ǥǡǡ ǤǤǡ Ǥǡǡ Ƥ DOJI INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR JOURNALS IMPACT FACTOR (IAJIF) 4/1(57)’2018 Special issue of scientiƤ c and professional journal “Journal of the National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine” on the pages of scientiƤ c journal “European Science” Journal of the National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine EuropeanEuropean ScienceScience Ǥ Ǥ ǤǡǤǤ ǤǤ Ǥ ǡ Ƿ Dzǡ Ƥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡǡ Ƥ Ǥ Ƥ - ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ - ơ ǡ Ǥ ȋ Ȍ ǡ Ƥ Ǥ ȋ ǡ Ȍǡ ȋǡ Ƥ ǡƤ Ƥ - Ȍǡ Ƥ ǡ ǡ ǡ- ǡ ǡƤ ǡ Ǥ
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2010, No.5
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • Analyses of Ukraine’s presidential election – pages 2, 3 and 4. • Canadian Bandurist Capella has ambitious season – page 13. • Community chronicle: Illinois, Minnesota, Pennsylvania – page 17. THEPublished U by theKRA Ukrainian NationalIN AssociationIAN Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No.5 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 31, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine Yushchenko honors Bandera As runoff nears, election battles erupt with Hero of Ukraine title between Tymoshenko,Yanukovych forces “What was hoped for for decades has finally happened,” Mr. Bandera said after accept- ing the award. “The Ukrainian state has recognized the heroic deeds of Stepan Bandera and the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian patriots who died for this country. This order is a brave act towards historical justice which affirms the truth and a new era of a Ukraine that we dream of.” As the end of his presiden- tial term approached, ethni- cally conscious Ukrainians pleaded with the president to bestow the honor upon Bandera, recognizing the Offi cial Website of Ukraine’s President nation won’t likely have a president in the next five to 10 President Viktor Yushchenko presents the Hero of Dmytro Korabliov/UNIAN Ukraine order to Stepan Bandera, grandson of the years with the political will to Police on January 25 confront national deputies from the Party of Regions who nationalist leader Stepan Bandera. take the controversial step. Deputies of the Ternopil were guarding the Ukrayina Polygraphic Plant, where election ballots are printed. City Council, as well as the Lviv and Ivano- by Zenon Zawada by Zenon Zawada key appellate court to search its comput- Frankivsk oblast councils, made such Kyiv Press Bureau ers the next day.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Ukraine
    Inside Ukraine October 30, 2014 №35 Content The Government Policy . 1 Coalition: ongoing battle about coalition standards . 1 Challenges of separatists’ elections . 2 Economic Situation . 3 Further drop in foreign trade . 3 Ukrainian government: between the rock and the hard place . 5 Political competition . 6 The President’s party failed to implement a minimum program . 6 Arseniy Yatsenyuk’s jackpot . 7 “Samopomich” as an illustration of demand for new faces . 8 “Opposition bloc” keeps hold on the electorate of Party of the Regions . 9 Ups and downs of Oleh Lyashko’s Radical Party . 9 Party “rejuvenation” did not help “Batkivshchyna” . 10 Those who have not got into parliamentary “boat” . 10 Inside Ukraine 35 The Government Policy Parliamentary elections in Ukraine were held Under dramatic reversals in coalition formation, according to democratic standards. They have giv- the government should keep in mind the upcoming en a popular mandate to pro-European democratic elections in the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s parties, which pledged to implement much-needed Republic and Luhansk People’s Republic, which are reforms. The creation of coalition will also follow scheduled for November 2, 2014. These elections new rules which are to be agreed by leading coali- will allow separatists to create their own quasi-state tion members. This parliament will not be able to institutions and will help play out the “Transnistria scapegoat others for the absence of reforms. For scenario” in Donbas. Ukrainian government should this reason, a new parliament should assume full decide how it is going to counter such scenarios, es- responsibility for any, even unpopular, state deci- pecially in view of Petro Poroshenko’s “peace plan”, sions.
    [Show full text]