Scottish Islands Renewable Project Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scottish Islands Renewable Project Final Report Scottish Islands Renewable Project Final Report CLIENT: DECC/ Scottish Government DATE: 14/05/2013 Confidentiality and Limitation Statement This document: (a) is proprietary and confidential to Baringa Partners LLP (“Baringa”) and should not be disclosed without our consent; (b) is subject to contract and shall not form part of any contract nor constitute an offer capable of acceptance or an acceptance; (c) excludes all conditions and warranties whether express or implied by statute, law or otherwise; (d) places no responsibility on Baringa Partners for any inaccuracy or error herein as a result of following instructions and information provided by the requesting party; (e) places no responsibility for accuracy and completeness on Baringa Partners for any comments on, or opinions regarding the functional and technical capabilities of any products mentioned where based on information provided by the product vendors; and (f) may be withdrawn by Baringa Partners upon written notice. Where specific clients are mentioned by name, please do not contact them without our prior written approval. Scottish Islands Renewable Project –Final Report 2/106 Baringa Partners LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership registered in England and Wales with registration number OC303471 and with registered offices at 3rd Floor, Dominican Court, 17 Hatfields, London SE1 8DJ UK. Copyright © Baringa Partners LLP 2013. All rights reserved. This document is subject to contract and contains confidential and proprietary information. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. 5 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 9 2.1. Context ......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3. Approach .................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1. LCoE modelling methodology ..................................................................................... 11 2.3.2. Socio-economic methodology .................................................................................... 12 2.4. Structure of the report ............................................................................................................... 12 3. OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES ........................................................ 13 3.1. Scottish Islands renewable resource potential .......................................................................... 13 3.1.1. Scottish Island onshore wind resource potential ....................................................... 13 3.1.2. Scottish Island wave and tidal resource potential ...................................................... 14 3.2. Grid Access ................................................................................................................................. 17 3.3. Central deployment scenario ..................................................................................................... 23 3.4. Key challenges ............................................................................................................................ 25 4. KEY DRIVERS FOR COST AND REVENUE DIFFERENCES ....................... 27 4.1. Summary LCoE modelling results ............................................................................................... 27 4.2. LCoE modelling results by Island (onshore wind) ....................................................................... 31 4.3. Key drivers for revenue differences ........................................................................................... 33 4.3.1. Wind yields ................................................................................................................. 33 4.3.2. Wave and tidal yields .................................................................................................. 34 4.3.3. Support regimes ......................................................................................................... 34 4.4. Key drivers for cost differences .................................................................................................. 35 4.4.1. Development .............................................................................................................. 35 4.4.2. Construction ............................................................................................................... 36 4.4.3. Operation .................................................................................................................... 37 4.5. Key drivers for risk differences ................................................................................................... 39 4.5.1. Grid access risks .......................................................................................................... 39 4.5.2. Grid charging risks ...................................................................................................... 41 4.5.3. Grid availability risks ................................................................................................... 44 4.5.4. Dependency on wider grid works in Scotland ............................................................ 45 4.5.5. Security and liability requirements ............................................................................. 46 4.5.6. Loss of diversity benefits under the CfD policy framework ........................................ 50 4.5.7. Currency and commodity price risks .......................................................................... 53 4.5.8. Technology risk – wave/tidal ...................................................................................... 53 4.6. Impact of cost and risk differences ............................................................................................ 54 5. SOCIO-ECONOMIC BENEFITS .................................................................... 55 5.1.1. Local benefits .............................................................................................................. 55 5.1.2. Summary of socio-economic benefits ........................................................................ 70 6. WIDER BENEFITS ........................................................................................ 71 Scottish Islands Renewable Project –Final Report 3/106 Baringa Partners LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership registered in England and Wales with registration number OC303471 and with registered offices at 3rd Floor, Dominican Court, 17 Hatfields, London SE1 8DJ UK. Copyright © Baringa Partners LLP 2013. All rights reserved. This document is subject to contract and contains confidential and proprietary information. 6.1.1. Potential Wider Benefits to UK Marine Energy Industry ............................................ 71 6.1.2. Likely Cost Reductions from Marine Technologies ..................................................... 72 6.1.3. Fuel poverty ................................................................................................................ 75 6.1.4. Increasing security of supply ...................................................................................... 75 7. POLICY OPTIONS ........................................................................................ 78 7.1. Issues to be addressed ............................................................................................................... 78 7.2. Addressing fund gap for Scottish Islands wind ........................................................................... 78 7.2.1. Rationale ..................................................................................................................... 78 7.2.2. Options ....................................................................................................................... 79 7.2.3. Summary ..................................................................................................................... 81 7.3. Financial support for marine technologies ................................................................................. 82 7.3.1. Rationale ..................................................................................................................... 82 7.3.2. Options ....................................................................................................................... 82 7.3.3. Summary ..................................................................................................................... 83 7.4. Greater support for marine R&D ................................................................................................ 83 7.4.1. Rationale ..................................................................................................................... 83 7.4.2. Options ....................................................................................................................... 84 7.4.3. Summary ..................................................................................................................... 84 7.5. De-risking Scottish Island transmission ...................................................................................... 85 7.5.1. Rationale ....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Lewis Wave Power Limited
    Lewis Wave Power Limited 40MW Oyster Wave Array North West Coast, Isle of Lewis Environmental Statement Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary March 2012 40MW Lewis Wave Array Environmental Statement 1. NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction This document provides a Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the Environmental Statement (ES) produced in support of the consent application process for the North West Lewis Wave Array, hereafter known as the development. The ES is the formal report of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken by Lewis Wave Power Limited (hereafter known as Lewis Wave Power) into the potential impacts of the construction, operation and eventual decommissioning of the development. 1.2 Lewis Wave Power Limited Lewis Wave Power is a wholly owned subsidiary of Edinburgh based Aquamarine Power Limited, the technology developer of the Oyster wave power technology, which captures energy from near shore waves and converts it into clean sustainable electricity. Aquamarine Power installed the first full scale Oyster wave energy convertor (WEC) at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney, which began producing power to the National Grid for the first time in November 2009. That device has withstood two winters in the harsh Atlantic waters off the coast of Orkney in northern Scotland. Aquamarine Power recently installed the first of three next-generation devices also at EMEC which will form the first wave array of its type anywhere in the world. 1.3 Project details The wave array development will have the capacity to provide 40 Megawatts (MW), enough energy to power up to 38,000 homes and will contribute to meeting the Scottish Government’s targets of providing the equivalent of 100% of Scotland’s electricity generation from renewable sources by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Siadar Wave Energy Project Siadar 2 Scoping Report Voith Hydro Wavegen
    Siadar Wave Energy Project Siadar 2 Scoping Report Voith Hydro Wavegen Assignment Number: A30708-S00 Document Number: A-30708-S00-REPT-002 Xodus Group Ltd 8 Garson Place Stromness Orkney KW16 3EE UK T +44 (0)1856 851451 E [email protected] www.xodusgroup.com Environment Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 The Proposed Development 6 1.2 The Developer 8 1.3 Oscillating Water Column Wave Energy Technology 8 1.4 Objectives of the Scoping Report 8 2 POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 10 2.1 Introduction 10 2.2 Energy Policy 10 2.2.1 International Energy Context 10 2.2.2 National Policy 10 2.3 Marine Planning Framework 11 2.3.1 Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 and the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 11 2.3.2 Marine Policy Statement - UK 11 2.3.3 National and Regional Marine Plans 11 2.3.4 Marine Protected Areas 12 2.4 Terrestrial Planning Framework 12 2.5 Environmental Impact Assessment Legislation 12 2.5.1 Electricity Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2000 13 2.5.2 The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 13 2.5.3 The Environmental Impact Assessment (Scotland) Regulations 1999 13 2.5.4 Habitats Directive and Birds Directive 13 2.5.5 Habitats Regulations Appraisal and Appropriate Assessment 13 2.6 Consent Applications 14 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 15 3.1 Introduction 15 3.2 Rochdale Envelope 15 3.3 Project Aspects 15 3.3.1 Introduction 15 3.3.2 Shore Connection (Causeway and Jetty) 15 3.3.3 Breakwater Technology and Structure 16 3.3.4 Parallel Access Jetty 17 3.3.5 Site Access Road 17 3.3.6
    [Show full text]
  • 小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category
    小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category Airborne contamination sensor Title Depth Evaluation of Entrained Products (DEEP) Proposed by Create Technologies Ltd & Costain Group PLC 1.DEEP is a sensor analysis software for analysing contamination. DEEP can distinguish between surface contamination and internal / absorbed contamination. The software measures contamination depth by analysing distortions in the gamma spectrum. The method can be applied to data gathered using any spectrometer. Because DEEP provides a means of discriminating surface contamination from other radiation sources, DEEP can be used to provide an estimate of surface contamination without physical sampling. DEEP is a real-time method which enables the user to generate a large number of rapid contamination assessments- this data is complementary to physical samples, providing a sound basis for extrapolation from point samples. It also helps identify anomalies enabling targeted sampling startegies. DEEP is compatible with small airborne spectrometer/ processor combinations, such as that proposed by the ARM-U project – please refer to the ARM-U proposal for more details of the air vehicle. Figure 1: DEEP system core components are small, light, low power and can be integrated via USB, serial or Ethernet interfaces. 小型飛翔体/海外 Figure 2: DEEP prototype software 2.Past experience (plants in Japan, overseas plant, applications in other industries, etc) Create technologies is a specialist R&D firm with a focus on imaging and sensing in the nuclear industry. Createc has developed and delivered several novel nuclear technologies, including the N-Visage gamma camera system. Costainis a leading UK construction and civil engineering firm with almost 150 years of history.
    [Show full text]
  • (SEUPB) Mid Term Evaluation of the INTERREG IVA Programme Final
    Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB) Mid Term Evaluation of the INTERREG IVA Programme Final Report October 2013 SEUPB Mid Term Evaluation of INTERREG IVA Final Report October 2013 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE AND STUDY APPROACH ...................................................................... 2 1.3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. 5 2 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ............................................................................................ 12 2.1 INTRODUCTION/SCOPE OF THIS REPORT ................................................................................ 12 2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................................... 12 2.3 PROGRAMME BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... 13 2.4 CHANGES IN DELIVERY STRUCTURES/PROCESSES FROM THE LAST PROGRAMME ........ 24 2.5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY AND REPORT STRUCTURE ..................................................... 25 3 STRATEGIC CONTEXT ............................................................................................................... 30 3.1 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • An Offshore Renewables Capacity Study for Dorset Dorset C-SCOPE Project
    An Offshore Renewables Capacity Study for Dorset Dorset C-SCOPE Project Dorset Coast Forum 1 April 2010 Final Report 9V5867 Stratus House Emperor Way Exeter, Devon EX1 3QS United Kingdom +44 (0)1392 447999 Telephone Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title An Offshore Renewables Capacity Study for Dorset Dorset C-SCOPE Project Document short title Offshore Renewables Capacity Study Status Final Report Date 1 April 2010 Project name Offshore Renewables Capacity Study Project number 9V5867 Client Dorset Coast Forum Reference 9V5867/R/303424/Exet Drafted by J. Trendall, G. Chapman & P. Gaches Checked by Peter Gaches Date/initials check …………………. …………………. Approved by Steve Challinor Date/initials approval …………………. …………………. This report has been produced by Haskoning UK Ltd. solely for Dorset Coast Forum in accordance with the terms of appointment for Dorset Offshore Renewables Capacity Study dated 01.02.2010 and should not be relied upon by third parties for any use whatsoever without express permission in writing from Haskoning UK Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, including photocopying or, transmitted by electronic means, or stored in an electronic retrieval system without express permission in writing from Haskoning UK Ltd. CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Study Overview 2 2 CURRENT TECHNOLOGIES REVIEW 2 2.1 Offshore Wind Technology Overview 2 2.2 Offshore Tidal Stream Technology Overview 9 2.3 Offshore Wave Technology Overview 9 2.4 Wave
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution Plc
    Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors report and financial statements Year ended 31 March 2019 Registered No.: SC213460 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Contents Page No. Directors and Other Information 1 Strategic Report 2 Corporate Governance Statement 12 Directors' Report 15 Statement of Directors' responsibilities in respect of the Strategic Report, the Directors' Report and the Financial 16 statements Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc 17 Profit and Loss Account 21 Balance Sheet 22 Statement of Changes in Equity 23 Cash Flow Statement 24 Notes on the Financial statements 25 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Directors and Other Information Directors Gregor Alexander (Chairman) Steven Kennedy (Resigned 07/09/18) Stuart Hogarth David Gardner (Resigned 31/01/19) Colin Nicol Dale Cargill Alistair Borthwick (Appointed 07/09/18, Resigned 28/06/19) Robert McDonald (Appointed 31/01/19) Rachel McEwen Katherine Marshall David Rutherford (Non-Executive Director) Gary Steel (Non-Executive Director) Registered office Inveralmond House 200 Dunkeld Road Perth PH1 3AQ Secretary Mark McLaughlin Auditor KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants 319 St Vincent Street Glasgow G2 5AS Registered number SC213460 1 Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc Strategic Report The Strategic Report sets out the main trends and factors underlying the development and performance of Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc (the “Company”) during the year ended 31 March 2019, as well as those matters which are likely to affect its future development and performance. The business, its objectives and strategy The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of SSE plc (the “Group”).
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Particles at Dounreay
    SEPTEMBER 20, 2007 | No. 660 HOT PARTICLES AT DOUNREAY The Dounreay nuclear complex, situated on a remote part of the north coast of Scotland, was once home to a variety of experimental nuclear facilities including two prototype fast breeder reactors, a reprocessing plant and a materials test reactor. Nearly all of these are now closed, but the legacy of their waste, pollution and accidents HOT PARTICLES AT DOUNREAY 1 lives on. One of the main areas of concern is the radioactive particles ILLEGAL TRAFFICKING: INCREASE found near the complex. The latest radioactive fragment found on INCIDENTS INVOLVING THEFT OR LOSS 2 Sandside beach is one of the hottest yet detected. SLEBOS CASE REVEALS FAILURE OF DUTCH AND EU NUCLEAR NON- (660.5826) WISE Amsterdam - The They entered the drains, which should PROLIFERATION POLICIES 4 particle of cesium-137 picked up during have carried only low-active waste a sweep of the beach on September 7 waster, either from the reprocessing RECORD URANIUM PRICE - WHAT was the third recovered since monitoring plant or from a controversial waste shaft. IS BEHIND AND WHAT ARE THE resumed on August 5 after a lengthy The highly radioactive particles were CONSEQUENCES 5 gap. This brings the legacy of pollution known as 'swarf' -the outside cladding from the nearby Dounreay plant to 97 from spent fuel assemblies which are cut HEAVY SUBSIDIES IN HEAVY used reactor fuel particles and an off at the very start of the reprocessing WATER: ECONOMICS OF NUCLEAR unidentified radioactive object. procedure to expose the fuel rods. These POWER IN INDIA 6 are some of the most highly radioactive After being taken back to a lab at the wastes from spent fuel reprocessing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • SSE Annual Report 2006
    POWERFUL OPPORTUNITIES Scottish and Southern Energy plc Annual Report 2006 Scottish and Southern Energy Annual Report 2006 Contents Chairman’s Statement 1 Directors’ Report 28 Dividends 59 What We Do 2 Corporate Governance 29 Earnings Per Share 60 Where We Are 4 Organisation and Structure 29 Intangible Assets 61 Key Performance Indicators 6 Board Effectiveness 30 Property, Plant and Equipment 63 Chief Executive’s Statement 8 Board Commitees 30 Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures 64 Audit Committee 30 Subsidiary Undertakings 66 Directors’ Statement 9 Remuneration Committee 31 Acquisitions and Disposals 68 Financial Overview 9 Nomination Committee 31 Inventories 70 Energy Systems 9 Risk Committee 32 Trade and Other Receivables 70 Generation and Supply 13 Executive Committee 32 Cash and Cash Equivalents 70 Contracting, Connections and Metering 20 Health, Safety and Environmental Advisory Committee 32 Trade and Other Payables 71 Gas Storage 21 Internal Control and Risk Management Current Tax Liabilities 71 Telecoms 22 Committee 32 Construction Contracts 71 Exceptional Items 22 Going Concern 33 Loans and Other Borrowings 71 Capital Expenditure 22 Communication with Shareholders Deferred Taxation 74 Financial Management 23 and Major Business Stakeholders 33 Provisions 75 Tax 23 Share Capital 76 Balance Sheet 25 Directors’ Biographies and Responsibilities 34 Reserves 76 Purchase of own Shares 25 Remuneration Report 36 Minority Interests 77 Corporate Responsibility 25 Retirement Benefit Obligations 78 Strategy and Outlook 25 Independent
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Technology Yearbook
    Offshore Technology Yearbook 2 O19 Generation V: power for generations Since we released our fi rst offshore direct drive turbines, we have been driven to offer our customers the best possible offshore solutions while maintaining low risk. Our SG 10.0-193 DD offshore wind turbine does this by integrating the combined knowledge of almost 30 years of industry experience. With 94 m long blades and a 10 MW capacity, it generates ~30 % more energy per year compared to its predecessor. So that together, we can provide power for generations. www.siemensgamesa.com 2 O19 20 June 2019 03 elcome to reNEWS Offshore Technology are also becoming more capable and the scope of Yearbook 2019, the fourth edition of contracts more advanced as the industry seeks to Wour comprehensive reference for the drive down costs ever further. hardware and assets required to deliver an As the growth of the offshore wind industry offshore wind farm. continues apace, so does OTY. Building on previous The offshore wind industry is undergoing growth OTYs, this 100-page edition includes a section on in every aspect of the sector and that is reflected in crew transfer vessel operators, which play a vital this latest edition of OTY. Turbines and foundations role in servicing the industry. are getting physically larger and so are the vessels As these pages document, CTVs and their used to install and service them. operators are evolving to meet the changing needs The growing geographical spread of the sector of the offshore wind development community. So is leading to new players in the fabrication space too are suppliers of installation vessels, cable-lay springing up and players in other markets entering vessels, turbines and other components.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update Europe
    Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update - Europe Tim Steinweg, Albert ten Kate & Kristóf Rácz November 2010 Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update - Europe Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 update: Europe Tim Steinweg, Albert ten Kate & Kristóf Rácz (SOMO) Amsterdam, November 2010 1 Colophon Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update - Europe November 2010 Authors: Tim Steinweg, Albert ten Kate & Kristóf Rácz Cover design: Annelies Vlasblom ISBN: 978-90-71284-63-2 Funding This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of Greenpeace Nederland. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of SOMO and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of Greenpeace Nederland. Published by Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: + 31 (20) 6391291 Fax: + 31 (20) 6391321 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. 2 Sustainability in the Power Sector 2010 Update - Europe Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures................................................................................................................. 5 List of Tables .................................................................................................................. 5 Abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing a Carbon Neutral Island
    Establishing a Carbon Neutral Island A Report for Highlands and Islands Enterprise and Highlands and Islands Community Energy Company by Alex Walker & Associates Jonathan Dawson, Michael Shaw, Alex Walker Peter Bakkers and Barney Walker June 2007 Carbon Neutral Island Final Report Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary........................................................................................... 4 1.1 List of abbreviations ..................................................................................... 7 1.2 Acknowledgements....................................................................................... 7 2 Introduction....................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Background .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Terms of reference........................................................................................ 9 2.3 Overview of the report.................................................................................. 9 3 Methodology .....................................................................................................10 3.1 Nature of the island......................................................................................10 3.2 Definition of carbon neutral.........................................................................10 3.3 Footprinting.................................................................................................10 3.4 Timescale
    [Show full text]